05.07.2014 Views

Report - School of Physics

Report - School of Physics

Report - School of Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2 Follow-Up Observations<br />

With reference to Figure 7, over the next 5–10 years ongoing or approved survey<br />

experiments are expected to generate:<br />

(a) high-mass (∼ M J ) candidates: some hundreds from COROT, Kepler and Eddington;<br />

thousands with Gaia astrometry and thousands <strong>of</strong> transiting systems with<br />

Gaia photometry; some hundreds from ongoing and future ground-based radial velocity<br />

surveys; and hundreds (possibly thousands) <strong>of</strong> hot Jupiters from ground-based<br />

transit surveys;<br />

(b) low-mass (∼ 1−3 M ⊕ ) candidates: a small number <strong>of</strong> hot terrestrial planets from<br />

COROT around 2008; with tens to hundreds from Kepler expected to be available<br />

to the community after about 2010.<br />

In principle, the information required for further characterisation <strong>of</strong> a detected planetary<br />

system is independent <strong>of</strong> the star or planet mass: as discussed elsewhere in<br />

this report: (a) radial velocity measurements <strong>of</strong> transit detections to eliminate false<br />

alarms due to grazing eclipsing binaries, triple stars, star spots, and false positives;<br />

(b) transit spectroscopy from ground or space for the determination <strong>of</strong> atmospheric<br />

properties; (c) the combination <strong>of</strong> transit or astrometry data with radial velocity<br />

information allowing the determination <strong>of</strong> the true mass <strong>of</strong> the planet; (d) photometric<br />

or spectroscopic information needed to characterise the parent star; (e) followup<br />

imaging <strong>of</strong> transiting candidates with high spatial resolution adaptive optics to<br />

minimise the possibility that the object is actually multiple, or that a foreground or<br />

background binary system is causing the dimming <strong>of</strong> the light; (f) all the above will<br />

provide candidates for ground-based imaging by VLT, VLTI, OWL, etc.<br />

For microlensing candidates, no follow-up observations are generally possible. Nevertheless,<br />

due to the relative proper motion, the lens star will increase its angular<br />

separation to the source star and become visible after some time. One case is known:<br />

MACHO LMC–5, in which the lens star was imaged after about 8 years or so (Alcock<br />

et al., 2001). So in principle, there exists a possibility to study the host star<br />

<strong>of</strong> a microlensing planet, depending on the mass/apparent brightness <strong>of</strong> the lensing<br />

(i.e., host) star, and on the relative transverse velocity.<br />

In practice, the problem is distinct for high-mass or low-mass planets.<br />

4.2.1 High-Mass Planets<br />

For high-mass objects (<strong>of</strong> order 1 M J ), ground-based follow-up transit measurements<br />

will generally be technically feasible with the current generation <strong>of</strong> instruments.<br />

COROT, Kepler, Eddington, Gaia, OGLE, possibly HST, and the ground-based<br />

transit networks will supply thousands <strong>of</strong> targets which can be followed from the<br />

ground. Small telescopes, preferably robotic, and substantial amounts <strong>of</strong> observing<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!