05.07.2014 Views

Report - School of Physics

Report - School of Physics

Report - School of Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C<br />

ESO 1997 Working Group on Extra-Solar Planets<br />

The ESO 1997 Working Group on the Detection <strong>of</strong> Extra-Solar Planets consisted<br />

<strong>of</strong> 16 members, and met on four occasions during 1996 and 1997. The assignment<br />

was to ‘advise ESO [...] on how to help designing a competitive strategy in this field<br />

that is predicted to expand dramatically in the next years, and to become one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

leading fields <strong>of</strong> astronomy in the next century.’ The 1997 Working Group and its<br />

task were somewhat comparable to the current effort, with the notable difference<br />

that this time the Working Group was asked to provide recommendations to both<br />

ESA and ESO, thereby encompassing both space- and ground-based astronomy.<br />

This appendix looks briefly at the findings and recommendations <strong>of</strong> their final report,<br />

published on 10 September 1997. This may provide some understanding <strong>of</strong> why some<br />

recommendations were successfully implemented while others were not, and what<br />

lessons can be learned from the past.<br />

In the introduction <strong>of</strong> their report the 1997 Working Group states: ‘Only by allocating<br />

a major fraction <strong>of</strong> time on some <strong>of</strong> its telescopes and developing new technology<br />

— and doing it now – will ESO fully exploit its potential in this field and be truly competitive.’<br />

They then laid out their plan to achieve this goal. They identified six areas<br />

in which ESO could play a critical role, namely: radial velocity searches, narrowangle<br />

astrometry, microlensing, direct detection, transits and timing <strong>of</strong> eclipses. The<br />

recommendations, planned timeframe, and status and achievements <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these<br />

is summarised in Table 10.<br />

Radial Velocity Searches: The main recommendation was to devote a major<br />

fraction <strong>of</strong> the observing time at the CAT and the 3.6 m to monitor the radial velocities<br />

<strong>of</strong> about 1000 stars over the next 5–10 years. They called for the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> a dedicated spectrograph providing an accuray <strong>of</strong> about 1 m/s. Such a survey was<br />

considered indispensable to provide targets for VLTI which was assumed to become<br />

operational by 2002. They also advocated high-fidelity calibration <strong>of</strong> the iodine cell<br />

for UVES and the timely development <strong>of</strong> CRIRES to provide a survey using twilight<br />

observations in order to obtain complimentary information in the IR.<br />

Narrow-Angle Astrometry: The Working Group considered astrometry a very<br />

attractive method for the study <strong>of</strong> planets because it allows for determination <strong>of</strong><br />

orbits and planet masses directly. It was considered complimentary to other search<br />

methods exploring different regions <strong>of</strong> parameter space. Achieving an accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

about 10 micro-arcsec was considered feasible. Realisation <strong>of</strong> the technique was<br />

regarded as technically very challenging, requiring knowledge <strong>of</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the<br />

baseline to within 50 µm and the knowledge <strong>of</strong> the delay between the two stars with<br />

5 nm precision over a 100 m baseline.<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!