11.07.2014 Views

Dr. S. Velmurugan, CRRI - IRF India chapter

Dr. S. Velmurugan, CRRI - IRF India chapter

Dr. S. Velmurugan, CRRI - IRF India chapter

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Design of Forgiving Roads on Inter-Urban<br />

Highways of <strong>India</strong> - Sharing of Experiences<br />

from Typical Road Safety Audit Studies on<br />

<strong>India</strong>n Highways<br />

by<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>. S.<strong>Velmurugan</strong><br />

Principal Scientist<br />

Traffic Engineering and Safety Division<br />

CSIR - Central Road Research Institute<br />

Technical Session III: Road Safety Engineering Measures for<br />

Urban & Rural Roads


PRESENTATION OUTLINE<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Background on International / National Road Crash Scene<br />

Road Safety Audit Process and Stages<br />

Sharing of Some Experiences drawn from Typical<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Detailed Design Stage RSAs<br />

Construction Stage Audits<br />

Pre-Opening Stage Audits<br />

<br />

Summary and Inferences<br />

2


Background on Road Crashes: An epidemic<br />

1.4 million people are killed and 50 million are injured<br />

worldwide per annum due to road crashes<br />

Developing countries account for 90% of the casualties<br />

It’s the leading cause of death of young people worldwide<br />

If unabated, the number of deaths will increase to 1.9<br />

million per annum (worldwide) by 2020<br />

The economic cost to developing countries amounts to<br />

around $100 billion a year<br />

3


Background: Road Crashes in <strong>India</strong> (Contd…)<br />

<strong>India</strong> has some unfortunate distinctions:<br />

‣Country with highest number of road crashes;<br />

Statistics of road crashes in 2011 is a whopping<br />

4,97,686<br />

Road crash-related fatalities; 1,42,485, in 2011 i.e.<br />

an average of one fatality per 3.5 road crashes<br />

The road crash-related cost amounts to 3% of our<br />

Gross Domestic Product (GDP)<br />

4


Background (Contd...)<br />

Total Number of Road Crashes, Fatalities<br />

and Person Injured during 2002 - 2011<br />

Source : Road Accidents in <strong>India</strong> (2011). New Delhi, Transport Research Wing, Ministry of<br />

Road Transport and Highways, Government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

5


Number of Road Crashes per Lakh<br />

Population (1970-2011)<br />

Background (Contd...)<br />

Source : Road Accidents in <strong>India</strong> (2011). New Delhi, Transport Research Wing, Ministry of<br />

Road Transport and Highways, Government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

6


Number of Road Crashes per Ten<br />

Thousand Vehicles (1970-2011)<br />

Background (Contd...)<br />

Source : Road Accidents in <strong>India</strong> (2011). New Delhi, Transport Research Wing, Ministry of<br />

Road Transport and Highways, Government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

7


Background (Contd...)<br />

Number of Road Crashes per Ten Thousand<br />

Kms. of Road Length (1970-2011)<br />

Source : Road Accidents in <strong>India</strong> (2011). New Delhi, Transport Research Wing, Ministry of<br />

Road Transport and Highways, Government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

8


Background (Contd...)<br />

Number of Road Crashes, Number of Persons Killed and<br />

Injured as per Type of Road (2002-2011)<br />

As per 2011 figures, the share of total road crashes on NHs and SHs is<br />

Source : Road<br />

30.1<br />

Accidents<br />

% and<br />

in<br />

24.6<br />

<strong>India</strong><br />

%<br />

(2011).<br />

respectively.<br />

New Delhi,<br />

Similarly,<br />

Transport Research<br />

the share<br />

Wing,<br />

of<br />

Ministry<br />

road<br />

of<br />

Road Transport<br />

fatalities<br />

and<br />

on<br />

Highways,<br />

NHs is<br />

Government<br />

37.1 % whereas<br />

of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

SHs account for 27.4 %<br />

9


Background (Contd...)<br />

Road Crash Scenario on National / State Highways<br />

National Highways (NHs) and State Highways (SHs)<br />

constitute merely 5.4 % of the total <strong>India</strong>n road network.<br />

Though the capacity of NHs being augmented by National<br />

Highway Development Program (NHDP); But sometimes,<br />

safety aspect is grossly overlooked in design and<br />

implementation.<br />

Source : Road Accidents in <strong>India</strong> (2011). New Delhi, Transport Research Wing,<br />

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

10


Number of Person Killed per Lakh<br />

Population (1970-2011)<br />

Background (Contd...)<br />

Persons killed per lakh of<br />

population jumped four-fold from<br />

2.7 in 1970 to 11.8 in 2011<br />

Source : Road Accidents in <strong>India</strong> (2011). New Delhi, Transport Research Wing, Ministry of<br />

Road Transport and Highways, Government of <strong>India</strong>.<br />

11


Background (Contd...)<br />

World Health Organization (WHO) has declared<br />

2011-2020 to be the Decade of Action for Road<br />

Safety with the following goal:<br />

Prevent five million road traffic deaths<br />

globally by 2020; <strong>India</strong> has rightly joined<br />

this endeavour<br />

12


Road Safety Audit Process and Stages:<br />

Two Basic Concepts of RSA<br />

Prevention Is Better Than Cure<br />

Safety audit seeks to minimize the risk of<br />

accidents occurring as a result of changes to the<br />

highway<br />

<strong>Dr</strong>ive, Ride, Walk in Safety<br />

Highlight the needs of Vulnerable Road Users (like<br />

Pedestrians, Cyclists and Two Wheelers)


Key RSA steps ….<br />

Select Audit Team<br />

Gather Information<br />

Commencement Meeting<br />

Closely Review <strong>Dr</strong>awings / Site Inspection<br />

Write Report<br />

Closure Meeting<br />

Respond to Report


Stages of Road Safety Audit<br />

Feasibility Stage<br />

Preliminary Design<br />

Stage<br />

Detailed Design Stage<br />

Construction Stage<br />

Pre - Opening Stage<br />

Existing Road


Presentation Agenda<br />

Sharing of Some Experiences drawn<br />

from Typical Detailed Design Stage<br />

RSAs conducted on National<br />

Highways<br />

16


Design / Development Stage Audit Consider<br />

Geometrics,<br />

Alignments<br />

Intersection layouts<br />

Clear zone issues<br />

Signs / line marking<br />

Crash protection<br />

Traffic control<br />

Lighting …. and more


Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Since additional land is available<br />

for Junction Improvement,<br />

consider providing 20 m radius<br />

coupled with extending the Foot<br />

Path on either side up to urban<br />

development<br />

Depressed Median Provision<br />

proposed at the Intersection a Cause<br />

of Concern considering the Quantum<br />

of Pedestrian Crossing Manoeuvre<br />

Major Intersection leading to Suryapet Town<br />

at Km 133/450 on NH-9


Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Provision of Varying Median<br />

Width not advisable at the<br />

Intersection<br />

Major Intersection leading to Janagam Town<br />

at Km 133/950 on NH-9


Access from Service Road provided too close to the<br />

Intersection on NH-21<br />

• It conflicts with<br />

the Intersection<br />

influence area.<br />

Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Recommendations<br />

•Provide access away from Intersections influence area .


Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Narrow span of the vehicular underpass on NH-21<br />

• Narrow vehicular<br />

underpass of 15.16m<br />

width for existing six<br />

lane divided<br />

carriageway road<br />

(30m ROW) is<br />

meeting the project<br />

road.<br />

Recommendations<br />

• Span of the underpass shall be at least 28m so as to provide six<br />

lane divided carriageway or with 2.5m side walk and 2.0m median<br />

to take care of future traffic.


Pedestrian Crossing Facilities at Intersections<br />

on NH-21<br />

• Stop line and Pedestrian<br />

Zebra crossing not<br />

provided properly<br />

• Pedestrian desire line of<br />

crossing across the<br />

approach roads is not<br />

followed appropriately and<br />

is not integrated with stop<br />

line and zebra crossing<br />

markings etc. leading to a<br />

situation where pedestrians<br />

will try to cross at<br />

unauthorized places and<br />

put themselves to risk.<br />

Recommendations<br />

Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

• Straight movement along the slip roads can be integrated with that along<br />

the main road and extra conflicts may be avoided. Proper pedestrian<br />

management / circulation plan integrating with signal phasing be provided.


Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Too many conflicts at Intersections on NH-21<br />

• Too many<br />

conflicts created<br />

by joining of<br />

service lane at<br />

the junctions.<br />

Recommendations<br />

• Merge service road with main road away from intersection influence area<br />

and allow only left turn of service road traffic at intersections.


Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

• Pedestrian safety: Access<br />

to the Truck Lay Bye is<br />

provided at the intersection<br />

which can increase conflicts<br />

for the pedestrian traffic due<br />

to diverging traffic to Truck<br />

Lay Bye.<br />

• Truck Lay Bye shall be<br />

shifted by at least 100 m<br />

towards Vijayawada side.<br />

Minor Intersection leading to Cheekati Gudem Village at Km 123/240 on NH-9


Recommendations: The junction requires re-design. The signage system should be<br />

corrected . Pedestrian needs may be properly addressed by providing adequate signs,<br />

marking and clear walking space through the channelizing islands along with railing<br />

barrier to guide the pedestrians.<br />

Rotary Junction at Ch.6+082 at the start of<br />

NH-15 at Pathankot End<br />

Safety Issues:<br />

• Traffic volume and<br />

turning movement<br />

data it is not<br />

provided to<br />

appreciate the<br />

design.<br />

• Inappropriate<br />

weaving lengths<br />

and sight distances<br />

• The straight traffic<br />

movement too<br />

tangential


Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Recommended Deceleration Lane<br />

Recommended<br />

Acceleration Lane<br />

Recommended Island to control<br />

the unwanted movements from<br />

Minor Road<br />

Recommended Conceptual Design<br />

for a Typical Minor Junction (T-Type)


Typical Detailed Design Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Recommended Conceptual Design for a<br />

Typical Four arm Intersection with Median<br />

Recommended<br />

Deceleration Lane<br />

Recommended<br />

Acceleration Lane<br />

Recommended<br />

Acceleration lane<br />

Recommended<br />

Deceleration Lane<br />

Recommended pocket lanes with<br />

50 m tamper and 30 m storage<br />

length for right turning traffic


Presentation Agenda<br />

Sharing of Some Experiences drawn<br />

from Typical Construction Stage RSAs<br />

conducted on National Highways<br />

28


Audits During Construction Stage Consider<br />

Crash Protection<br />

Delineations<br />

Traffic Control<br />

Traffic Management


Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

After Compliance<br />

Issues Raised during RSA<br />

On NH-9, Road Width is<br />

reducing due RUB, at Km 81/500;<br />

To provide Retro Reflective<br />

Strips on Steel Structure coupled<br />

with Sign Boards + Hazard<br />

Marker Sign + Restriction End<br />

Sign at the terminal point<br />

Photo 2.36: Completed


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

At Ch. 76.100, the embankment<br />

height seems to be more than<br />

3m; it needs to be checked and<br />

safety treatment to be provided<br />

accordingly using W-Beam<br />

MCBs or Concrete Guard Post<br />

as the case may be<br />

After Compliance: By<br />

providing Concrete Guard<br />

Rails after ascertaining<br />

Embankment height < 3 m<br />

31


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Kamineni<br />

Hospital<br />

Intersection (near Km 89/0)<br />

on NH-9 is being improved<br />

as per the proposed<br />

Improvement Plan<br />

After Compliance<br />

32


Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Km 100/500 Junction on NH-9<br />

leading to Nalgonda to be<br />

developed as per the Suggestion of<br />

CSIR-<strong>CRRI</strong><br />

After Compliance<br />

33


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

At Km 102/00, the Km Stone<br />

placement is away from the<br />

direction of travel on NH-9<br />

After Compliance<br />

34


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Due to the creation of such type<br />

of Rumble Strips, Right turning<br />

traffic resorting to the use of<br />

Wrong Lane on NH-9 -<br />

Suggested to create a<br />

Physical Island instead of<br />

Ghost Island to prevent such<br />

lawless movement<br />

After Compliance<br />

35


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Service Road Access near<br />

Km 215/00 on the RHS on<br />

NH-9 being provided with<br />

Guard Rail as per 3 rd report<br />

of Construction Stage Audit -<br />

To be fortified by posting 40<br />

Kmph as well<br />

After Compliance<br />

36


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Vedadri Temple Km 212/40-<br />

Lot of Pedestrian Movement<br />

is witnessed; Need for<br />

Posting of 40 Kmph Speed<br />

Limit on highway on NH-9<br />

After Compliance<br />

37


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Need for the Erection of<br />

Speed Breaker on the Cross<br />

Road at Km 212/400 and<br />

Development Parking Area<br />

for Autos at Vedadri<br />

Crossing on NH-9<br />

After Compliance<br />

38


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

After Compliance<br />

Improper Integration of<br />

MCB with CCB by leaving<br />

a Huge Gap at Km<br />

110/300 on NH-9


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

After Compliance<br />

W-Beam Metal Crash Barriers<br />

(MCBs) recommended for<br />

erection at the median opening<br />

near habitation area on fast<br />

traffic side of the carriageway at<br />

Km 212/400 on NH-9<br />

40


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

After Compliance<br />

W-Beam on the outer edge of<br />

curve where the slope of<br />

embankment is steeper than<br />

2H:1V, @ Km 135 (Near Sri<br />

Venkeshwara Engineering College)<br />

on NH-9<br />

41


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

After Compliance<br />

Need for the parapet walls of<br />

the Concrete Crash Barriers<br />

(CCBs) to be in flush at Km<br />

115/000 to Km 114/000 on<br />

NH-9<br />

42


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

At Kattangur minor<br />

junction improvement as<br />

per Independent Engineer /<br />

Safety Consultant and<br />

Observations on NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Improvement of Eenadu<br />

Junction recommended by<br />

CSIR-<strong>CRRI</strong> and Independent<br />

Consultants on NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

After Compliance<br />

Need for the proper access<br />

development from the Service<br />

Road to the<br />

Project Road at Janagaon<br />

Intersection on NH-9


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Series of Chevron Sign<br />

and W-Beam MCB<br />

missing at 158.000 on<br />

NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Presentation Agenda<br />

Sharing of Some Experiences drawn<br />

from Typical Pre-Opening Stage RSAs<br />

conducted on National Highways<br />

47


Pre Opening Audits Consider ..<br />

Previous audit issues<br />

Roadside crash protection<br />

Correctness of signs/markings<br />

The users view ….. and more


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Construction Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Absence of OHM near Km<br />

56/00 on the LHS on NH-9<br />

After Compliance<br />

49


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre-Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Restriction End Sign only after<br />

RUB; 80 Kmph Speed Limit Sign<br />

shall be in place after a distance<br />

of 100m on NH-9<br />

After Compliance<br />

50


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre-Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Religious Structure Sign to<br />

be placed up front at about<br />

100 m from the 'Side Road' i.e.<br />

Kashimpet on NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Road Marking at the<br />

Junction not completed as<br />

per the approved drawing<br />

on NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Need for the Erection of<br />

series of Concrete Posts on<br />

the Service Road as located<br />

on Embankment on NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Clustering of Signs at<br />

Km 221/500 makes it not<br />

Comprehensible and<br />

also Absence of Mixing<br />

Zone Road Markings at<br />

the end of the project<br />

highway becoming two<br />

lane bi-directional<br />

carriageway on NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Typical Pre Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Need for the relocation of<br />

‘STOP Sign’ at the<br />

Nawabpeta Bypass End Point<br />

on the RHS from the centre<br />

of the Island to Edge of the<br />

Island + Directional Road<br />

Marking + Speed Hump on<br />

NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

SDBC required to be done<br />

on Service Road at<br />

Chillakallu as the same need<br />

to be used for Through<br />

Traffic movement; till ROB<br />

completion;<br />

Speedy Closure of Open<br />

Storm Water <strong>Dr</strong>ains near<br />

ROB under Development at<br />

Chillakullu on RHS on NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Sign Board not as per<br />

IRc-67 (2012) near<br />

Chillakullu VUP<br />

Crossing on the RHS on<br />

NH-9<br />

After Compliance


Issues Raised during RSA<br />

Typical Pre Opening Stage RSAs (Contd…)<br />

Road Crash due to Over<br />

Speeding of Vehicle in spite<br />

of FORTIFYING the<br />

Horizontal Curve with<br />

Series of Chevron Signs on<br />

the RHS on NH-9<br />

Road Crash due to<br />

Over Speeding<br />

during day time<br />

and Dozing Off by<br />

the driver on the<br />

Straight Corridor -<br />

Tyre Skid Marks<br />

reflect the same


To summarize - Action Plan for <strong>India</strong>n Roads<br />

• RSA should be carried out at all stages including<br />

planning, design, construction and operation,<br />

for all highways and the recommendations<br />

should be duly implemented.<br />

• However, there appears to be little concrete action<br />

on the ground except for audit of selected<br />

Expressways / NHs / SHs projects<br />

• Even where the RSA has been done, the<br />

recommendations of the audit do not appear<br />

to have been implemented except a few.


To summarize - Action Plan for <strong>India</strong>n Roads (Contd…)<br />

• Unfortunately, the road maintenance is limited to fixing<br />

pot-holes and clearing of drainage facilities and plantation<br />

without replacing the missing / dilapidated traffic signs,<br />

guard rails, road markings and other safety features<br />

essential to create a safe road network.<br />

• In addition, safety measures incorporated in the road<br />

design of highways based on the RSA carried out at<br />

different Stages of Audit (esp. Design Stage) are frequently<br />

deleted with a view to reducing the overall cost of<br />

projects.<br />

• This defeats the basic aim of design of road to tackle<br />

road safety issues from the beginning and obviate future<br />

problems.


To conclude,<br />

Making roads easier to use, self-enforcing and<br />

more forgiving is highly cost-effective. To<br />

achieve that we need to factor the following:<br />

• Safety-conscious design standards<br />

• Conduct of RSA and their implementation for<br />

new projects / expansion projects /existing roads.<br />

• Treatment of crash ‘black spots / hotspots’ (Lack<br />

of authentic road crash data with proper reference<br />

to the chainage sometimes makes it harder to<br />

identify those spots)


Thank You.<br />

Any Queries Please!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!