18.07.2014 Views

Crosslink - Space-Library

Crosslink - Space-Library

Crosslink - Space-Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Engineering and Integrating<br />

the Ballistic Missile Defense System<br />

Since the early 1980s, The Aerospace Corporation has helped<br />

develop different elements of what is now being integrated as the<br />

nation’s Ballistic Missile Defense System. More recently, Aerospace<br />

has been leading a research team supporting systems engineering<br />

for this complex system.<br />

David S. Eccles<br />

Today, for the first time, the United<br />

States has in its arsenal a system capable<br />

of defending against a limited ballistic<br />

missile attack. The system is complex, and<br />

consists of many components or elements, as<br />

well as an extensive infrastructure that ties the<br />

far-flung pieces together. Some have compared<br />

the effort to build this system with earlier U.S.<br />

efforts to construct the first atomic weapon or<br />

land a man on the moon. While such comparisons<br />

are perhaps overdrawn, it is true that no<br />

such system existed before President George<br />

W. Bush directed the partial deployment of a<br />

Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) by<br />

2004.<br />

At the time, the United States possessed a<br />

set of autonomous weapon and sensor systems,<br />

each with its own set of requirements and<br />

funding, and each being acquired independently<br />

by different branches of the armed services.<br />

But there was no integrating framework<br />

to bring the various elements together. Still, an<br />

extensive legacy of research and development<br />

to explore the feasibility of building such a<br />

defense system had begun during the Reagan<br />

administration, so this new effort was not<br />

starting from scratch. In 1983, the Strategic<br />

Defense Initiative Office (SDIO) was formed,<br />

and had begun to assemble existing capabilities<br />

and to develop ways of flight testing many<br />

of these elements.<br />

In 2002, the various missile defense efforts<br />

were assembled under the newly formed Missile<br />

Defense Agency (MDA). This included<br />

the Army’s ground-based missile defense<br />

and Theater High-Altitude Area Defense<br />

programs, the Navy’s Aegis ballistic missile<br />

defense program, and the Air Force’s <strong>Space</strong><br />

Tracking and Surveillance System and Airborne<br />

Laser program. The Army’s Patriot<br />

program was also brought under the MDA for<br />

program management and integration.<br />

The Systems Engineering<br />

Challenge<br />

The MDA was directed to deploy an initial<br />

capability to defend against ballistic missile<br />

threats to the homeland, deployed forces, allies,<br />

and friends. Aerospace personnel had been<br />

assigned to assist the agency as it faced the<br />

formidable task of integrating and delivering<br />

a system capable of responding to real threats,<br />

and perhaps even more importantly, of adapting<br />

to evolving threats.<br />

The basic premise of integration for the<br />

BMDS is the idea of a layered defense, one in<br />

which the various components of the system<br />

whittle away at an incoming raid. Ballistic<br />

missiles have a boost, midcourse, and terminal<br />

phase, so defensive capabilities that address<br />

these phases can be combined to produce a<br />

much more effective total system than one in<br />

which the various components stand alone.<br />

The system would come to be defined by an<br />

approach of capabilities-based acquisition,<br />

spiral development, two-year delivery blocks,<br />

knowledge points, and an MDA dedicated<br />

testing infrastructure. Aerospace led a team of<br />

laboratory experts that assisted in defining this<br />

approach for integrating the BMDS.<br />

Competition among organizations for<br />

funding, talent, roles, and responsibilities developed<br />

as the various program offices and elements<br />

were integrated into the newly formed<br />

MDA. Each of these offices and elements<br />

faced their own technical and programmatic<br />

challenges. Each had a unique culture and<br />

view of how its mission should be executed,<br />

and each faced political, technical, and programmatic<br />

constraints. Each program office<br />

had stakeholders with equities to be defended,<br />

and each was used to working autonomously,<br />

pursuing a clearly defined mission.<br />

BMDO (Ballistic Missile Defense Organization)<br />

had largely been a research and<br />

<strong>Crosslink</strong> Spring 2008 • 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!