24.07.2014 Views

Memo to State sector chief executives re re-employment after ...

Memo to State sector chief executives re re-employment after ...

Memo to State sector chief executives re re-employment after ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In these situations, a single inflexible approach will not necessarily meet the justice of every<br />

situation and employers will need <strong>to</strong> exercise sound judgement. Employees who <strong>re</strong>ceive<br />

<strong>re</strong>dundancy compensation in good faith and who have not obtained an offer of <strong>employment</strong><br />

have no certainty (even if they have begun <strong>to</strong> apply for other positions during the notice period)<br />

that they have another position <strong>to</strong> go <strong>to</strong>, and suffer a loss of continuity in <strong>employment</strong>. Such<br />

employees will have properly <strong>re</strong>ceived <strong>re</strong>dundancy compensation and will often use the<br />

compensation <strong>to</strong> protect their position.<br />

Whe<strong>re</strong>, however, an employee <strong>re</strong>ceives a job shortly <strong>after</strong> <strong>re</strong>ceiving <strong>re</strong>dundancy compensation<br />

the following may help <strong>to</strong> shape your thinking and <strong>to</strong> ensu<strong>re</strong> that the decision <strong>to</strong> make or not<br />

make an appointment in these circumstances is robust and defendable.<br />

SSC guidance on <strong>re</strong>-<strong>employment</strong> post <strong>re</strong>dundancy:<br />

<br />

<br />

The SSC expects Chief Executives <strong>to</strong> ensu<strong>re</strong> that good candidates a<strong>re</strong> not bar<strong>re</strong>d from <strong>re</strong><strong>employment</strong><br />

because they have <strong>re</strong>ceived compensation for a <strong>re</strong>cent loss of <strong>employment</strong>,<br />

but the decision <strong>to</strong> proceed with an <strong>employment</strong> offer must be balanced against the<br />

questions of fairness <strong>to</strong> the taxpayer and <strong>re</strong>sponsible use of <strong>re</strong>sources.<br />

If you a<strong>re</strong> considering offering <strong>employment</strong> <strong>to</strong> someone <strong>re</strong>cently made <strong>re</strong>dundant, on<br />

similar or better terms and conditions than they p<strong>re</strong>viously enjoyed in the <strong>State</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r, we<br />

would advise you <strong>to</strong> consider all <strong>re</strong>levant fac<strong>to</strong>rs and <strong>to</strong> look for possible options that<br />

avoid “double dipping”. While the<strong>re</strong> is a legal obligation <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>cruit the person best suited<br />

<strong>to</strong> the position, if the time elapsed since the employee left their p<strong>re</strong>vious role is short you<br />

might consider ag<strong>re</strong>eing some arrangement with the employee like deferring the<br />

appointment if this is feasible or for the applicant <strong>to</strong> <strong>re</strong>pay part of the compensation <strong>to</strong> the<br />

former <strong>State</strong> sec<strong>to</strong>r employer. The mo<strong>re</strong> senior the position the mo<strong>re</strong> appropriate such an<br />

arrangement may be.<br />

We a<strong>re</strong> NOT advocating that anyone made <strong>re</strong>dundant should not be <strong>re</strong>-employed, but rather<br />

that the taxpayer should not pay twice for the same period of time.<br />

Best practice in both the private and public sec<strong>to</strong>rs is for <strong>re</strong>dundancy compensation <strong>to</strong> be a<br />

capped entitlement, sometimes based on cur<strong>re</strong>nt service, but becoming less so. We note that<br />

some entitlements cur<strong>re</strong>ntly provide for <strong>re</strong>dundancy payments based in part on an employee’s<br />

family status - that may be discrimina<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

However, in considering any approach <strong>to</strong> this matter you must always pay due <strong>re</strong>gard <strong>to</strong> the<br />

applicable <strong>employment</strong> ag<strong>re</strong>ement and any other specific legal <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>ments.<br />

The SSC <strong>employment</strong> <strong>re</strong>lations advisors a<strong>re</strong> available <strong>to</strong> provide advice and support <strong>to</strong><br />

agencies in this a<strong>re</strong>a if <strong>re</strong>qui<strong>re</strong>d.<br />

<strong>Memo</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>State</strong> Sec<strong>to</strong>r CEs <strong>re</strong> Re-<strong>employment</strong> <strong>after</strong> Redundancy 11-02-11 (2).DOC 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!