31.07.2014 Views

illicit-trade-wco-2013

illicit-trade-wco-2013

illicit-trade-wco-2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 9. Survey response results<br />

North of Africa, West and East and South America, Europe Far East, South<br />

Near and Central Southern North America, and South East Asia<br />

Middle East Africa Africa Central America Australasia and<br />

and the Caribbean<br />

the Pacific Islands<br />

Total number 17 23 24 31 51 33<br />

of countries<br />

Number of 2 4 9 12 41 12<br />

responses<br />

The survey results evidenced a general interest from<br />

Members in ratifying the Protocol. In the run up to the<br />

ratification, respondents indicated that the most<br />

prominent leading authority was the Ministry of Health.<br />

Nevertheless, Customs would potentially be more<br />

involved in the process of implementing the Protocol<br />

after it enters into force.<br />

The majority of Members declared that they had<br />

access to statistics regarding the domestic production<br />

and consumption of tobacco and that they were able<br />

to track and trace the supply chain of tobacco<br />

products, mostly by using their Customs declaration<br />

systems.<br />

On the one hand, a high number of Customs<br />

administrations indicated that they had a possibility to<br />

maintain records of imports and exports of tobacco<br />

products and tobacco manufacturing equipment. On<br />

the other hand, the majority of respondents pointed out<br />

that they did not have information concerning the<br />

domestic production of tobacco manufacturing<br />

equipment. With regards to retail sales of tobacco<br />

products via the Internet, the survey showed that they<br />

were allowed in a large number of jurisdictions.<br />

administrative laws in a great number of countries,<br />

but only half of the respondents indicated to have<br />

the authority/procedure in place to conduct “controlled<br />

deliveries”.<br />

The vast majority of Customs administrations replied<br />

that they had the legal authority to share information<br />

related to the supply chain of tobacco products with<br />

other administrations.<br />

Most countries responded that they considered the<br />

counterfeiting and smuggling of cigarettes as a high<br />

priority. As to the capability to evaluate the size and<br />

the scale of the revenue losses associated with this<br />

criminal phenomenon, only half of the participants<br />

replied positively.<br />

Concerning the questions related to control provisions<br />

on the manufacturing and transactions of tobacco<br />

products in free zones, 33 countries indicated the<br />

existence of a system of control, while 22 countries<br />

confirmed that that a system was in place, but was not<br />

necessarily effective.<br />

Seizure of 3,000,000 cigarettes declared with a false HS code<br />

Photo courtesy of Uganda Customs<br />

The majority of administrations replied positively to the<br />

question concerning the existence of a control system<br />

for recording duty free sales of tobacco products and<br />

for the supply of tobacco products in ship stores.<br />

Results also evidenced that the <strong>illicit</strong> trafficking of<br />

tobacco products is subject to both criminal and<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!