31.07.2014 Views

AMSOIL P.i. - A Study in Performance (G2543) - Synthetic Motor Oil

AMSOIL P.i. - A Study in Performance (G2543) - Synthetic Motor Oil

AMSOIL P.i. - A Study in Performance (G2543) - Synthetic Motor Oil

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Heat must escape from the eng<strong>in</strong>e dur<strong>in</strong>g combustion and postcombustion,<br />

and a great deal of it enters the <strong>in</strong>take valve. Once there,<br />

it has three ways of gett<strong>in</strong>g out of the eng<strong>in</strong>e. It can go up the stem, <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the guide and out to the coolant passages; it can go through the valve<br />

seat itself, <strong>in</strong>to the head and <strong>in</strong>to the coolant passages or it can escape<br />

the <strong>in</strong>take valve through the surface on the back side. Any fuel on the<br />

back side of that surface evaporates and contributes to the combustion<br />

process. Because deposits act as an <strong>in</strong>sulator, they block a lot of this<br />

heat transfer and force the heat to go out through the valve seat or valve<br />

stem rather than com<strong>in</strong>g back to the <strong>in</strong>take track to help evaporate the<br />

gasol<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

BMW Valve Deposit <strong>Study</strong><br />

BMW developed a specific <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> valve deposits <strong>in</strong> the late 1980s due to drivability problems with its vehicles,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g stumbl<strong>in</strong>g, stall<strong>in</strong>g, rough idle and hesitation. A study on valve deposits showed dirty valves were the source<br />

of the problems (Graph B <strong>in</strong>dicates that as valve deposits <strong>in</strong>creased, drivability problems <strong>in</strong>creased), and the company<br />

<strong>in</strong>vested a great deal of time and effort search<strong>in</strong>g for solutions, try<strong>in</strong>g everyth<strong>in</strong>g from polish<strong>in</strong>g the valve surfaces to<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g ceramic-coated valves. The solution that worked<br />

Graph B<br />

was add<strong>in</strong>g a clean<strong>in</strong>g additive to the gasol<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Graph C<br />

Intake Valve Deposits (mg/valve)<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

0<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200<br />

Test Method: <strong>Motor</strong>ed Dyno D5500 Type Road Simulation Cycle<br />

79%<br />

Cleanup<br />

58<br />

12<br />

1997 Honda<br />

2.2L Accord<br />

53%<br />

Cleanup<br />

414<br />

193<br />

1997 Jeep 4.0L<br />

Grand Cherokee<br />

36%<br />

Cleanup<br />

212<br />

135<br />

1998 Ford 4.0L<br />

Explorer<br />

98%<br />

Cleanup<br />

49<br />

1<br />

1999 Toyota<br />

1.8L Corolla<br />

91%<br />

Cleanup<br />

61<br />

5<br />

1999 Toyota<br />

2.2L Camry<br />

76%<br />

Cleanup<br />

249<br />

59<br />

1999 Oldsmobile<br />

3.1L Cutlass<br />

70%<br />

Cleanup<br />

Pre Cleanup<br />

Post Cleanup<br />

115<br />

34<br />

2002 Cadillac<br />

4.6L Deville<br />

<strong>AMSOIL</strong> P.i. averaged 72% <strong>in</strong>take valve deposit cleanup across a<br />

wide range of eng<strong>in</strong>e types and sizes, with two cars clean<strong>in</strong>g up<br />

greater than 90%.<br />

Intake Valve Deposit Clean-Up Test<br />

A small fleet test performed on P.i. effectively demonstrates<br />

its superior deposit-clean<strong>in</strong>g abilities. The test focused<br />

on randomly selected model year 1997 to 2002 used<br />

vehicles with between 44,000 and 94,000 miles on<br />

the odometers, and all vehicles had been operated<br />

under normal service conditions us<strong>in</strong>g regular gasol<strong>in</strong>e<br />

available on the market.<br />

Vehicle Model<br />

Mileage<br />

1997 Honda 2.2L Accord 85,000<br />

1997 Jeep 4.0L Grand Cherokee 94,000<br />

1998 Ford 4.0L Explorer 57,000<br />

1999 Toyota 1.8L Corolla 44,000<br />

1999 Toyota 2.2L Camry 53,000<br />

1999 GM 3.1L Oldsmobile Cutlass 52,000<br />

2002 GM 4.6L Cadillac DeVille 55,000<br />

Before P.i.treatment, each vehicle was disassembled,<br />

and <strong>in</strong>take valve deposit levels were measured <strong>in</strong> a<br />

laboratory sett<strong>in</strong>g. Upon completion, the vehicles were<br />

put back together and filled with one tank of P.i.-treated<br />

gasol<strong>in</strong>e. After runn<strong>in</strong>g through that tank of fuel, the<br />

vehicles were brought back <strong>in</strong>to the laboratory, where all<br />

the measurements were taken aga<strong>in</strong>.<br />

The red bars on Graph C represent the pre-treatment<br />

<strong>in</strong>take valve deposit levels of the vehicles, rang<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

49 mg to 414 mg. The blue bars represent the deposit<br />

levels after P.i. treatment, show<strong>in</strong>g an average 72<br />

percent clean-up after only one tank of gasol<strong>in</strong>e. Even<br />

the vehicles with m<strong>in</strong>imal pre-treatment deposit levels cleaned up very well, show<strong>in</strong>g an average 89 percent clean-up,<br />

with the Toyota Corolla show<strong>in</strong>g 98 percent deposit clean-up.<br />

<strong>AMSOIL</strong> P.i.: A <strong>Study</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!