06.08.2014 Views

Wheeler, Mechanics

Wheeler, Mechanics

Wheeler, Mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4 Functional integration<br />

It is also possible to integrate functionals. Since a functional has an entire function as its argument, the<br />

functional integral is a sum over all functions in some well-defined function space. Such a sum is horribly<br />

uncountable, but it is still possible to perform some functional integrals exactly by taking the infinite limit<br />

of the product of finitely many normal integrals. For more difficult functional integrals, there are many<br />

approximation methods. Since functional integrals have not apppeared widely in classical mechanics, we do<br />

not treat them further here. However, they do provide one approach to quantum mechanics, and play an<br />

important role in quantum field theory.<br />

3 Physical theories<br />

Within any theory of matter and motion we may distinguish two conceptually different features: dynamical<br />

laws and measurement theory. We discuss each in turn.<br />

By dynamical laws, we mean the description of various motions of objects, both singly and in combination.<br />

The central feature of our description is generally some set of dynamical equations. In classical mechanics,<br />

the dynamical equation is Newton’s second law,<br />

F = m dv<br />

dt<br />

or its relativistic generalization, while in classical electrodynamics two of the Maxwell equations serve the<br />

same function:<br />

1 dE<br />

c dt − ∇ × B = 0<br />

1 dB<br />

c dt + ∇ × E = 4π c J<br />

The remaining two Maxwell equations may be regarded as constraints on the initial field configuration. In<br />

general relativity the Einstein equation gives the time evolution of the metric. Finally, in quantum mechanics<br />

the dynamical law is the Schrödinger equation<br />

Ĥψ = i ∂ψ<br />

∂t<br />

which governs the time evolution of the wave function, ψ.<br />

Several important features are implicit in these descriptions. Of course there are different objects –<br />

particles, fields or probability amplitudes – that must be specified. But perhaps the most important feature<br />

is the existence of some arena within which the motion occurs. In Newtonian mechanics the arena is Euclidean<br />

3-space, and the motion is assumed to be parameterized by universal time. Relativity modified this to a<br />

4 -dimensional spacetime, which in general relativity becomes a curved Riemannian manifold. In quantum<br />

mechanics the arena is phase space, comprised of both position and momentum variables, and again having<br />

a universal time. Given this diverse collection of spaces for dynamical laws, you may well ask if there is any<br />

principle that determines a preferred space. As we shall see, the answer is a qualified yes. It turns out that<br />

symmetry gives us an important guide to choosing the dynamical arena.<br />

A measurement theory is what establishes the correspondence between calculations and measurable numbers.<br />

For example, in Newtonian mechanics the primary dynamical variable for a particle is the position<br />

vector, x. While the dynamical law predicts this vector as a function of time, we never measure a vector<br />

directly. In order to extract measurable magnitudes we use the Euclidean inner product,<br />

〈u, v〉 = u · v<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!