26.08.2014 Views

Section 6: Selected Applications & Techniques

UT testing self study notes

UT testing self study notes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Section</strong> 6: <strong>Selected</strong> <strong>Applications</strong><br />

& <strong>Techniques</strong>


Content: <strong>Section</strong> 6: <strong>Selected</strong> <strong>Applications</strong> & <strong>Techniques</strong><br />

6.1: Defects & Discontinuities<br />

6.2: Rail Inspection<br />

6.3: Weldments (Welded Joints)<br />

6.4: Pipe & Tube<br />

6.5: Echo Dynamic<br />

6.6: Technique Sheets<br />

6.7: Material Properties-Elastic Modulus Measurements<br />

6.8: High Temperature Ultrasonic Testing<br />

6.9: Thickness Gauging<br />

6.10: In-Service Inspection<br />

Continues next page….


6.11: Casting<br />

6.12: Inspection of bonded Joints<br />

6.13: Corrosion Monitoring<br />

6.14: Crack Monitoring<br />

6.15: Residual Stress Measurements<br />

6.16: Bond Testing<br />

Appendix: (Non-exam)<br />

6.App-1: TOFD Introduction


6.1: Defects & Discontinuities


6.1.1 Casting Defects & Discontinuities


Casting Defects & Discontinuities


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- A Cold Shut is caused when a molten<br />

metal is poured over solidified metal without fusing.


Casting Defects & Discontinuities – Hot tear or shrinkage crack forms<br />

when the molten section of unequal thickness solidified and the shrinkage<br />

stress tear the partially molten apart.


Casting Defects & Discontinuities


Micro-shrinkage is usually many small subsurface holes that appear at the<br />

gate of casting / can also occur when molten metal must flow from a thin<br />

section into thicker section of casting.<br />

Blow hole are small hole at the surface of the casting caused by gas which<br />

comes from the mold itself. (wet sand mould forming steam resulting in blowhole)<br />

Porosity is caused by entrapped gas. It is usually subsurface or surface<br />

depending on the mold design.


Casting Defects & Discontinuities


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Hot Tear


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Blister


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Porosity


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Porosity


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Porosity


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Porosity


Casting Defects & Discontinuities - Mismatch


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Cold Shut


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Missrun


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Misrun


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Blow Hole


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Gas Porosity


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Porosity


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Cold Shut


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Shrinkage Cavity


Casting Defects & Discontinuities- Assorted


6.1.2 Processing Defects & Discontinuities


Processing Defects & Discontinuities


Salute to the Steel Workers!


Processing Defects & Discontinuities- Lamination formed when the<br />

casting defects are flatten during rolling, forging, extrusion or other<br />

mechanical working processes.


Processing Defects & Discontinuities- Stringers formed when the billet is<br />

rolled into shape the casting non metallic inclusions are squeezed into long<br />

and thinner inclusions.


Processing Defects & Discontinuities- Forging lap is caused by folding of<br />

metal on the surface, usually when some of the metal is squuaed ot between<br />

the two dies.


Processing Defects & Discontinuities- Forging burst is a rupture causes<br />

by forging at improper temperature. The burst may be internal or external.


Processing Defects & Discontinuities


Q9: The preferred method of ultrasonically inspecting a complex-shape<br />

forging:<br />

A. Is an automated immersion test of the finished forging using instrument<br />

containing a calibrated attenuator in conjunction with a C-scan recorder<br />

B. Combined thorough inspection of the billet prior to forging with a<br />

careful inspection of the finished part in all areas where shape permit<br />

C. Is a manual contact test of the finished part<br />

D. Is an automated immersion test of the billet prior to forging


6.1.3 Welding Defects & Discontinuities


Welding Defects & Discontinuities


Welding Defects & Discontinuities


Welding Defects & Discontinuities


Welding Defects & Discontinuities


Welding Defects & Discontinuities


Welding Defects & Discontinuities


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Incomplete Penetration


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Slag Inclusion


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Cluster Porosity


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Lack of Sidewall Fusion (with Slag<br />

entrapped)


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Wagon Track<br />

(slag inclusion at hot pass)


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Burn Thru


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Offset with LOP


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Excessive Penetration


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Internal (Root) Under Cut


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Transverse Crack


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Tungsten Inclusion


Welding Defects & Discontinuities- Root Pass Porosity


6.1.4 Service Induced Defects & Discontinuities


Service Induced Defects & Discontinuities<br />

http://failure-analysis.info/2010/05/analyzing-material-fatigue/


Service Induced Defects & Discontinuities- Fatigue Cracks


Figure 4-24 – In a carbon steel sample, metallographic section through a<br />

thermal fatigue crack indicates origin at the toe of an attachment weld. Mag.<br />

50X, etched.


Figure 4-26 – Metallographic cross-section of a superheated steam outlet that<br />

failed from thermal fatigue. Unetched.


Figure 4-36 – Weld detail used to join a carbon steel elbow (bottom) to a weld<br />

overlaid pipe section (top) in high pressure wet H2S service. Sulfide stress<br />

cracking (SSC) occurred along the toe of the weld (arrow), in a narrow zone<br />

of high hardness.


Figure 4-37 – High magnification photomicrograph of SSC in pipe section<br />

shown in Figure 4-36.


Figure 4-38 – Failure of DMW joining 1.25Cr-0.5Mo to Alloy 800H in a Hydrodealkylation<br />

(HAD) Reactor Effluent Exchanger. Crack propagation due to<br />

stresses driven at high temperature of 875°F (468°C) and a hydrogen<br />

partial pressure of 280 psig (1.93 MPa).


Figure 4-57 – Vibration induced fatigue of a 1-inch socket weld flange in a<br />

thermal relief system shortly after startup.


Figure 4-58 – Cross-sectional view of the crack in the socket weld in Figure 4-<br />

57.


Figure 5-1 – Localized amine corrosion at the weld found in piping from<br />

reboiler to regenerator tower in an MEA unit. Many other similar cases found,<br />

some going as deep as half thickness. They were originally found and<br />

mistaken as cracks with shear wave UT inspection.


Figure 5-2 – Hot Lean Amine Corrosion of Carbon Steel:


Figure 5-3 – Preferential weld corrosion in lean amine (Reference 5)


Figure 5-46 – Overhead interstage knockout drum vapor outlet nozzle.


Figure 5-47 – Carbonate cracking adjacent to a weld (Reference 6).


Figure 5-48 – Metallographic sample showing intergranular carbonate<br />

cracking developed after 6 months service (Reference 6).lean amine<br />

(Reference 5)


Figure 5-49 – Most cracks originate in base metal but this weldment<br />

contained a crack that originated at the root and propagated through the weld<br />

metal. Other cracks appear to have initiated in the HAZ (Reference 7).


6.2: Rail Inspection


Rail Inspection<br />

One of the major problems that railroads have faced since the earliest days is<br />

the prevention of service failures in track. As is the case with all modes of<br />

high-speed travel, failures of an essential component can have serious<br />

consequences. The North American railroads have been inspecting their<br />

most costly infrastructure asset, the rail, since the late 1920's. With increased<br />

traffic at higher speed, and with heavier axle loads in the 1990's, rail<br />

inspection is more important today than it has ever been. Although the focus<br />

of the inspection seems like a fairly well-defined piece of steel, the testing<br />

variables present are significant and make the inspection process challenging.<br />

Rail inspections were initially performed solely by visual means. Of course,<br />

visual inspections will only detect external defects and sometimes the subtle<br />

signs of large internal problems.


The need for a better inspection method became a high priority because of a<br />

derailment at Manchester, NY in 1911, in which 29 people were killed and 60<br />

were seriously injured. In the U.S. Bureau of Safety's (now the National<br />

Transportation Safety Board) investigation of the accident, a broken rail was<br />

determined to be the cause of the derailment. The bureau established that the<br />

rail failure was caused by a defect that was entirely internal and probably<br />

could not have been detected by visual means. The defect was called a<br />

transverse fissure (example shown on the bottom). The railroads began<br />

investigating the prevalence of this defect and found transverse fissures were<br />

widespread.


Transverse Fissure


Transverse Fissure


Transverse Fissure


One of the methods used to inspect rail is ultrasonic inspection. Both<br />

normal- and angle-beam techniques are used, as are both pulse-echo and<br />

pitch-catch techniques. The different transducer arrangements offer different<br />

inspection capabilities. Manual contact testing is done to evaluate small<br />

sections of rail but the ultrasonic inspection has been automated to allow<br />

inspection of large amounts of rail.<br />

Fluid filled wheels or sleds are often used to couple the transducers to the<br />

rail. Sperry Rail Services, which is one of the companies that perform rail<br />

inspection, uses Roller Search Units (RSU's) comprising a combination of<br />

different transducer angles to achieve the best inspection possible. A<br />

schematic of an RSU is shown below.


<strong>Techniques</strong>: Wheel Probe


<strong>Techniques</strong>: Examples of axles with outside bearings of the Deutsche<br />

Bundesbahn. (a) Of goods truck; (b) axle with roller bearing, bearing ring not<br />

removed; c same with additional brake disc


<strong>Techniques</strong>: (c) same with additional brake disc


6.3: Weldments (Welded Joints)


6.3.1: UT of Weldments (Welded Joints)<br />

The most commonly occurring defects in welded joints are porosity, slag<br />

inclusions, lack of side-wall fusion, lack of inter-run fusion, lack of root<br />

penetration, undercutting, and longitudinal or transverse cracks.<br />

With the exception of single gas pores all the defects listed are usually well<br />

detectable by ultrasonics. Most applications are on low-alloy construction<br />

quality steels, however, welds in aluminum can also be tested. Ultrasonic flaw<br />

detection has long been the preferred method for nondestructive testing in<br />

welding applications. This safe, accurate, and simple technique has pushed<br />

ultrasonics to the forefront of inspection technology.<br />

Ultrasonic weld inspections are typically performed using a straight beam<br />

transducer in conjunction with an angle beam transducer and wedge. A<br />

straight beam transducer, producing a longitudinal wave at normal incidence<br />

into the test piece, is first used to locate any laminations in or near the heataffected<br />

zone. This is important because an angle beam transducer may not<br />

be able to provide a return signal from a laminar flaw.


UT of Weldments (Welded Joints)<br />

F<br />

s<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

x<br />

a = s sinß<br />

a' = a - x<br />

d' = s cosß<br />

d = 2T - t'<br />

a<br />

a'<br />

ß = probe angle<br />

s = sound path<br />

a = surface distance<br />

a‘ = reduced surface distance<br />

d‘ = virtual depth<br />

d = actual depth<br />

T = material thickness<br />

ß<br />

Work piece with welding<br />

s<br />

Lack of fusion<br />

d


UT Calculator


Flaw Detection- Depth Determination


The second step in the inspection involves using an angle beam transducer<br />

to inspect the actual weld. Angle beam transducers use the principles of<br />

refraction and mode conversion to produce refracted shear or longitudinal<br />

waves in the test material. [Note: Many AWS inspections are performed using<br />

refracted shear waves. However, material having a large grain structure, such<br />

as stainless steel may require refracted longitudinal waves for successful<br />

inspections.] This inspection may include the root, sidewall, crown, and heataffected<br />

zones of a weld. The process involves scanning the surface of the<br />

material around the weldment with the transducer. This refracted sound wave<br />

will bounce off a reflector (discontinuity) in the path of the sound beam. With<br />

proper angle beam techniques, echoes returned from the weld zone may<br />

allow the operator to determine the location and type of discontinuity.


T = Plate Thickness<br />

ϴ = Shear wave angle<br />

LEG = T/Cos ϴ, V path= 2 x LEG.<br />

Skip = 2.T Tan ϴ


https://www.mandinasndt.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=32%253A<br />

ut-angle-beam-calculator&catid=12%253Atools&Itemid=18<br />

https://www.nde-ed.org/GeneralResources/Formula/AngleBeamFormula/AngleBeamTrig.htm


Flaw Detection- Triangulations of reflector<br />

ϴ = Refracted angle T= Thickness LEG1=LEG2= T/Cos ϴ<br />

V PATH= 2x LEG= 2T/Cos ϴ<br />

SKIP= 2.T Tan ϴ<br />

ϴ


Flaw Detection- Triangulations of reflector<br />

ϴ = Refracted angle T= Thickness Surface Distance= S.Sin ϴ<br />

Depth= S.Cos ϴ<br />

ϴ


To determine the proper scanning area for the weld, the inspector must first<br />

calculate the location of the sound beam in the test material. Using the<br />

refracted angle, beam index point and material thickness, the V-path and skip<br />

distance of the sound beam is found. Once they have been calculated, the<br />

inspector can identify the transducer locations on the surface of the material<br />

corresponding to the crown, sidewall, and root of the weld.


6.3.2 Weld Scanning


Expert at works


Typical Scanning Patterns:<br />

Typically the weld should be inspected in the 1 st or 2 nd leg (1 st Skip).


Typically scanning patterns


Weld Scanning


Weld Scanning


Weld Scanning


Weld Scanning


Echo Dynamic- Position of Defects<br />

Sometimes it will be possible to differentiate between these 2 defects simply<br />

by plotting their position within the weld zone:


Echo Dynamic- Position of Defects


Plate Weld Scanning


Plate Weld Scanning


Plate Weld Scanning


Plate Weld Scanning


Plate Weld Scanning


Practice Makes Perfect<br />

52. One of the most apparent characteristics of a discontinuity echo, as<br />

opposed to a non-relevant indication is:<br />

(a) Lack of repeatability<br />

(b) Sharp, distinct signal<br />

(c) Stable position with fixed transducer position<br />

(d) High noise level<br />

58. What useful purpose may be served by maintaining grass on the baseline?<br />

(a) To estimate casting grain size<br />

(b) To provide a reference for estimating signal to noise ratio<br />

(c) To verify adequate coupling to the test piece<br />

(d) All of the above


Practice Makes Perfect<br />

62. Which of the following conditions would be most likely to cause strong,<br />

interfering surface waves?<br />

(a) High frequency transducers<br />

(b) Testing on a small diameter surface<br />

(c) Testing on a flat surface<br />

(d) Testing on a curved surface with a contoured wedge and transducer


6.4: Pipe & Tube


Pipe & Tube


Pipe & Tube


Experts at work


Pipe Scanning


Pipe Scanning


Pipe Scanning<br />

48.59 o max<br />

30 o max


Pipe Scanning


Pipe Scanning


Pipe Scanning- thickness/OD ratio


Pipe Scanning- thickness/OD ratio<br />

When the t/OD ratio = .2 , t=.2OD, ID=OD-2t= OD-.4OD= .6OD<br />

ϴ max = Sin -1 (ID/OD), ϴ max = Sin -1 (0.6), ϴ max = 37° Max.<br />

For the sound path to scans the inner face the maximum shear angle shall be<br />

37° Max. Therefore 45° /60° /70° probe can not scan the pipe inner face.


Pipe Scanning- Contact Methods


Pipe Scanning- Contact Methods


Pipe Scanning- Contact Methods


Q: Calculate the maximum shear wave angle and the range for 360°<br />

revolution scanning when the shear wave angle is 45°.<br />

Given that the OD=6” Thickness=3/4”<br />

Answer:<br />

(a)<br />

The maximum shear wave angle ϴ = Sin -1 (ID/OD) = Sin -1 (2.25/3)<br />

ϴ = 48.6° Max.<br />

(b) ?


Answer part B<br />

c<br />

a<br />

b<br />

a/Sin A = b/Sin B<br />

2.25/ Sin 45 = b / Sin B, 3.182= b/ Sin B,<br />

c = a.Sin B, Sin B= c/a<br />

3.182= b/c x 2.25, b/c= 1.414


Q35: During immersion testing of pipe or tubing the incident longitudinal wave<br />

angle must be limited to a narrow range. The reason for the upper limit is:<br />

(a) To avoid complete reflection of ultrasound from the test piece<br />

(b) To prevent formation of Rayleigh waves<br />

(c) To prevent formation of shear waves<br />

(d) To avoid saturating the test piece with ultrasound


Q35: Which of the following may result in a narrow rod if the beam<br />

divergence results in a reflection from a side of the test piece before the<br />

sound wave reaches the back surface:<br />

A. Multiple indications before the first back reflection<br />

B. Indications from multiple surface reflections<br />

C. Conversion from longitudinal mode to shear mode<br />

D. Loss of front surface indications


6.5: Echo Dynamic


Expert at works


6.5.1 Basic echodynamic pattern of reflectors<br />

Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Non-destructive testing of welds -<br />

Ultrasonic testing - Characterization of indications in welds; German version<br />

EN 1713:1998 + A1:2002


Basic echodynamic pattern of reflectors<br />

C.1 Pattern 1<br />

Point-like reflector response, figure C.1. At any probe position the A-scan<br />

show a single sharp echo. As the probe is moved this rises in amplitude<br />

smoothly to a single maximum before falling smoothly to noise level.<br />

4<br />

5<br />

2<br />

3<br />

6<br />

1<br />

7


C.1 Pattern 1 Point-like reflector


C.1 Pattern 1 Point-like reflector


C.2 Pattern 2<br />

Extended (elongated) smooth reflector respond, figure C.2. At any probe<br />

position the A-scan shows a single sharp echo. When the ultrasound beam is<br />

moved over the reflector the echo rises smoothly to a plateau and is<br />

maintained with minor variation in magnitude up to 4 dB, until the beam<br />

moves off the reflector, when the echo fall smoothly to noise level.


C.2 Pattern 2<br />

Extended (elongated) smooth reflector


C.2 Pattern 2<br />

Extended (elongated) smooth reflector


C.2 Pattern 2<br />

Extended (elongated) smooth reflector<br />

(figure modified to depict obliquely oriented planar face)<br />

Extended (elongated)<br />

smooth reflector-planar<br />

face obliquely oriented


C.3 Pattern 3<br />

Extended (elongated) rough reflector response. There are two variants of this<br />

pattern, depending upon the angle of incident of the probe beam on the<br />

reflector.


C.3 Pattern 3a<br />

Extended (elongated) rough reflector response. Near normal incidence, figure<br />

C.3a At any probe position the A-scan shows a single but rugged echo. As<br />

the probe moved this may undergo large (>+/- 6dB) random fluctuation in<br />

amplitude. The fluctuation are caused by reflection from the different facets of<br />

the reflector and by interference of waves scattered from the groups of facets.


C.3 Pattern 3a<br />

Extended (elongated) rough reflector response.


C.3 Pattern 3a<br />

Extended (elongated) rough reflector response.


C.3 Pattern 3b<br />

Oblique incidence, travelling echo pattern, figure C.3 b At any probe position,<br />

the A-scan shows an extended train of signals (subsidiary peaks) within a<br />

bell-shaped pulse envelope. As the probe is moved each subsidiary peak<br />

travels through the pulse envelop, rising to its own maximum toward the<br />

center envelop and then falling. The overall signal may shown large (>+/-6dB)<br />

random fluctuation in amplitude.


C.3 Pattern 3b<br />

Oblique incidence, travelling echo pattern


C.3 Pattern 3b<br />

Oblique incidence, travelling echo pattern


C.4 Pattern 4<br />

Multiple reflector respond, figure C.4. At any probe position the A-scan shows<br />

a cluster of signal which may or may not be well resolved in range. As the<br />

probe is moved the signals rise and fall at random but the signal from each<br />

separate reflector element ,if resolved, shows pattern 1 respond.


C.4 Pattern 4<br />

Multiple reflector respond


C.4 Pattern 4<br />

Multiple reflector respond


Echodynamic- Change of echo height and echo shape when the direction of<br />

irradiation is changed. (a) On flat or linear flaw; (b) on rounded flaw


Echodynamic- Differences between the indications of inclusions and cracks,<br />

drawn schematically and exaggerated for greater clarity. a Inclusions; b flake<br />

cracks. The echoes of the more distantflaws, because of divergence and<br />

attenuation of the sound beam, are rather weak


Break Time


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Flaw detection


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Flaw Detection


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Flaw detections


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Improper flaw orientation


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Improper flaw orientation


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Reflection angle


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Angles of reflection


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Improper flaw orientation


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Perfect flaw orientation


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Improper flaw orientation


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Vertical near surface flaw


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Tandem <strong>Techniques</strong>


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Tandem <strong>Techniques</strong>


Echo Dynamic of Discontinuity- Tandem <strong>Techniques</strong>


Echo Dynamic


Echo Dynamic- Root Concavity


Echo Dynamic


Echo Dynamic


Echo Dynamic


Echo Dynamic


Echo Dynamic<br />

Crack


Echo Dynamic- Broad indication with low amplitude


Echo Dynamic- Shaper indication and higher amplitude than porosity


Echo Dynamic


Echo Dynamic<br />

Threadlike defects, point defects and flat planar defects orientated nearnormal<br />

to the beam axis all produce an echo response which has a single<br />

peak


Echo Dynamic<br />

The echo response from a large slag inclusion or a rough crack is likely to<br />

have multiple peaks:


Echo Dynamic<br />

In case “a” it will be difficult to determine whether the defect is slag or a crack.<br />

“Rotational- Swivel” or “orbital” probe movements may help:


Echo Dynamic<br />

Typical Echo Dynamic Patterns


Echo Dynamic<br />

Typical Echo Dynamic Patterns


Echo Dynamic<br />

Typical Echo Dynamic Patterns


Q. A smooth flat discontinuity whose major plane is not perpendicular to the<br />

direction of sound propagation may be indicated by:<br />

A. An echo amplitude comparable in magnitude to the back surface reflection<br />

B. A complete loss of back surface reflection<br />

C. An echo amplitude larger in magnitude than the back surface reflection<br />

D. All of the above


Q183. In immersion testing, irrelevant or false indications caused by<br />

contoured surfaces are likely to result in a:<br />

A. Broad base indication<br />

B. Peaked indication<br />

C. Hashy signal<br />

D. Narrow based indication


Q24. During inspection of a parallel sided machined forging using straight<br />

beam immersion techniques, a diminishing back reflection in a localized<br />

area in the absence of a defect indication would least likely represent:<br />

A. A course grain structures<br />

B. A small non-metallic stringer<br />

C. A defect oriented at a severe angle to the entry surface<br />

D. A large inclusion.


Q46. Which best describes a typical display of a crack whose major surface is<br />

perpendicular to the ultrasound beam?<br />

A. A broad indication<br />

B. A sharp indication<br />

C. A indication will not show due to improper orientation<br />

D. A broad indication with high amplitude


Q46. A smooth flat discontinuities whose major plane is not perpendicular to<br />

the direction of sound propagation may be indicated by:<br />

A. An echo amplitude comparable in magnitude to the back surface reflection<br />

B. A complete loss of back surface reflection<br />

C. An echo amplitude larger in magnitude than the back surface reflection<br />

D. All of the above


6.6: Technique Sheets


Expert at works


Hanger Pin Testing using Shear Wave<br />

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04042/index.cfm#toc


Physical Dimension


Physical Dimension


Physical Dimension


Physical Dimension


Reporting: Basic Pin Information


Reporting: Scanning Report – Top of Pin


Reporting: Scanning Report – Bottom of Pin


Mock-Up


Mock-Up


Mock-Up


Mock-Up


Mock-Up


Reporting: Basic Pin Information


Hanger Pin Testing using Shear Wave


Pitch and Catch Methods- Echo Dynamic


Pitch and Catch Methods- Set-up


Pitch and Catch Methods- Echo Dynamic


6.7: Material Properties-<br />

Elastic Modulus Measurements


6.7.1 Determination of Microstructural Differences<br />

Ultrasonic methods can be used to determine microstructural differences in<br />

metals. For this, contact testing with the pulse-echo technique is used. The<br />

testing can be either the measurement of (1) ultrasonic attenuation or the (2)<br />

measurement of bulk sound velocity.


6.7.2 The attenuation method<br />

The attenuation method is based on the decay of multiple echoes from test<br />

piece surfaces. Once a standard is established, other test pieces can be<br />

compared to it by comparing the decay of these echoes to an exponential<br />

curve. This test is especially suited for the microstructural control of<br />

production parts, in which all that is necessary is to determine whether or not<br />

the parts conform to a standard. An example of the use of ultrasonic<br />

attenuation in the determination of differences in microstructure is the control<br />

of graphite-flake size in gray iron castings, which in turn controls tensile<br />

strength. In one application, a water-column search unit that produced a<br />

pulsed beam with a frequency of 2.25 MHz was used to test each casting<br />

across an area of the casting wall having uniform thickness and parallel front<br />

and back surfaces.


A test program had been first carried out to determine the maximum size of<br />

graphite flakes that could be permitted in the casting and still maintain a<br />

minimum tensile strength of 200 MPa (30 ksi). Then, ultrasonic tests were<br />

made on sample castings to determine to what intensity level the second<br />

back reflection was lowered by the attenuation effects of graphite flakes larger<br />

than permitted. Next, a gate was set on the ultrasonic instrument in the region<br />

of the second back reflection, and an alarm was set to signal whenever the<br />

intensity of this reflection was below the allowable level. The testing<br />

equipment was then integrated into an automatic loading conveyor, where the<br />

castings were 100% inspected and passed or rejected before any machining<br />

operation.


6.7.3 Velocity Measurements<br />

Velocity Measurements When considering the compressional and shear<br />

wave velocities given in Table 1, there may be small deviations for crystalline<br />

materials because of elastic anisotropy. This is important and particularly<br />

evident in copper, brass, and austenitic steels. The following example<br />

illustrates the variation of sound velocity with changes in the microstructure of<br />

leaded free-cutting brass.


6.7.4 Elastic Modulus Measurement<br />

Application:<br />

Measurement on Young's Modulus and Shear Modulus of Elasticity, and<br />

Poisson's ratio, in non-dispersive isotropic engineering materials.<br />

Background:<br />

1. Young's Modulus of Elasticity is defined as the ratio of stress (force per<br />

unit area) to corresponding strain (deformation) in a material under tension<br />

or compression.<br />

2. Shear Modulus of Elasticity is similar to the ratio of stress to strain in a<br />

material subjected to shear stress.<br />

3. Poisson's Ratio is the ratio of transverse strain to corresponding axial<br />

strain on a material stressed along one axis.<br />

http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/applications/elastic-modulus-measurement/<br />

http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/applications/?347[search][sCategoryId][1166017122]=1166017163&347[search][submit]=Search


Elastic Modulus Measurement – Young’s Modulus & Shear Modulus<br />

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shear_modulus


Elastic Modulus Measurement- Poisson Ratio


These basic material properties, which are of interest in many manufacturing<br />

and research applications, can be determined through computations based<br />

on measured sound velocities and material density.<br />

Sound velocity can be easily measured using ultrasonic pulse-echo<br />

techniques with appropriate equipment. The general procedure outlined<br />

below is valid for any (1) homogeneous, (2) isotropic, (3) non-dispersive<br />

material (velocity does not change with frequency).<br />

This includes most common metals, industrial ceramics, and glasses as long<br />

as cross sectional dimensions are not close to the test frequency wavelength.<br />

Rigid plastics such as polystyrene and acrylic can also be measured,<br />

although they are more challenging due to higher sound attenuation.<br />

Keyword:<br />

non-dispersive material (velocity does not change with frequency).


Rubber cannot be characterized ultrasonically because of its high dispersion<br />

and nonlinear elastic properties. Soft plastics similarly exhibit very high<br />

attenuation in shear mode and as a practical matter usually cannot be tested.<br />

In the case of anisotropic materials, elastic properties vary with direction, and<br />

so do longitudinal and/or shear wave sound velocity. Generation of a full<br />

matrix of elastic moduli in anisotropic specimens typically requires six<br />

different sets of ultrasonic measurements.<br />

Porosity or coarse granularity in a material can affect the accuracy of<br />

ultrasonic modulus measurement since these conditions can cause variations<br />

in sound velocity based on grain size and orientation or porosity size and<br />

distribution, independent of material elasticity.<br />

Keyword:<br />

anisotropic materials, elastic properties vary with direction


Equipment:<br />

The velocity measurements for modulus calculation are most commonly<br />

made with precision thickness gages such as models 38DL PLUS and 45MG<br />

with Single Element software, or a flaw detector with velocity measurement<br />

capability such as the EPOCH series instruments. Pulser/receivers such as<br />

the Model 5072PR or 5077PR can also be used with an oscilloscope or<br />

waveform digitizer for transit time measurements.<br />

This test also requires two transducers appropriate to the material being<br />

tested, for pulse-echo sound velocity measurement in longitudinal and shear<br />

modes. Commonly used transducers include an M112 or V112 broadband<br />

longitudinal wave transducer (10 MHz) and a V156 normal incidence shear<br />

wave transducer (5 MHz). These work well for many common metal and fired<br />

ceramic samples. Different transducers will be required for very thick, very<br />

thin, or highly attenuating samples. Some cases may also require use of<br />

through transmission techniques, with pairs of transducers positioned on<br />

opposite sides of the part. It is recommended that in all cases the user consult<br />

Olympus for specific transducer recommendations and assistance with<br />

instrument setup.


The test sample may be of any geometry that permits clean pulse/echo<br />

measurement of sound transit time through a section on thickness. Ideally<br />

this would be a sample at least 0.5 in. (12.5 mm) thick, with smooth<br />

parallel surfaces and a width or diameter greater than the diameter of the<br />

transducer being used. Caution must be used when testing narrow<br />

specimens due to possible edge effects that can affect measured pulse<br />

transit time. Resolution will be limited when very thin samples are used<br />

due to the small changes in pulse transit time across short sound paths.<br />

For that reason we recommend that samples should be at least 0.2 in. (5<br />

mm) thick, preferably thicker. In all cases the thickness of the test sample<br />

must be precisely known.<br />

Keywords:<br />

1. Caution must be used when testing narrow specimens due to possible<br />

edge effects that can affect measured pulse transit time.<br />

2. Resolution will be limited when very thin samples are used due to the<br />

small changes in pulse transit time across short sound paths.


Testing Procedure: Equipment Used.<br />

Measure the (1) longitudinal and (2) shear wave sound velocity of the test<br />

piece using the appropriate transducers and instrument setup.<br />

The shear wave measurement will require use of a specialized high viscosity<br />

couplant such as our SWC. A Model 38DL PLUS a 45MG thickness gage<br />

can provide a direct readout of material velocity based on an entered sample<br />

thickness, and an EPOCH series flaw detector can measure velocity through<br />

a velocity calibration procedure. In either case, follow the recommended<br />

procedure for velocity measurement as described in the instrument's<br />

operating manual. If using a pulser/receiver, simply record the round-trip<br />

transit time through an area of known thickness with both longitudinal and<br />

shear wave transducers, and compute:<br />

Question: For measurement of shear wave velocity is normal incident<br />

transverse wave used? (hint by the used of highly viscous couplant<br />

requirement)


Testing Procedure: Velocity Measurements & Calculations<br />

Velocity= Distance / ( ½ Round trip traverse time)<br />

Convert units as necessary to obtain velocities expressed as inches per<br />

second or centimeters per second. (Time will usually have been measured in<br />

microseconds, so multiply in/uS or cm/uS by 10 6 to obtain in/S or cm/S.) The<br />

velocities thus obtained may be inserted into the following equations.<br />

Poisson Ratio (v) =<br />

Young’s Modulus =<br />

Shear Modulus =


Velocity & Equations<br />

Poisson Ratio (v) =<br />

Young’s Modulus (E) =<br />

Shear Modulus (G) = ,<br />

V L , V S<br />

v<br />

p<br />

= Longitudinal and Shear Velocity<br />

= Poisson ratio<br />

= Material density


Note on units: If sound velocity is expressed in cm/S and density in g/cm 3 ,<br />

then Young's modulus will be expressed in units of dynes/cm 2 . If English units<br />

of in/S and lbs/in 3 are used to compute modulus in pounds per square inch<br />

(PSI), remember the distinction between "pound" as a unit of force versus a<br />

unit of mass. Since modulus is expressed as a force per unit area, when<br />

calculating in English units it is necessary to multiply the solution of the above<br />

equation by a mass/force conversion constant of (1 / Acceleration of Gravity)<br />

to obtain modulus in PSI. Alternately, if the initial calculation is done in metric<br />

units, use the conversion factor 1 psi = 6.89 x 104 dynes/cm 2 . Another<br />

alternative is to enter velocity in in/S, density in g/cm 3, and divide by a<br />

conversion constant of 1.07 x 104 to obtain modulus in PSI.


6.8: High Temperature Ultrasonic Testing


Experts at work


1.0 Background:<br />

Although most ultrasonic flaw detection and thickness gauging is performed<br />

at normal environmental temperatures, there are many situations where it is<br />

necessary to test a material that is hot. This most commonly happens in<br />

process industries, where hot metal pipes or tanks must be tested without<br />

shutting them down for cooling, but also includes manufacturing situations<br />

involving hot materials, such as extruded plastic pipe or thermally molded<br />

plastic immediately after fabrication, or testing of metal ingots or castings<br />

before they have fully cooled. Conventional ultrasonic transducers will<br />

tolerate temperatures up to approximately 50° C or 125° F. At higher<br />

temperatures, they will eventually suffer permanent damage due to internal<br />

disbonding caused by thermal expansion. If the material being tested is hotter<br />

than approximately 50° C or 125° F, then high temperature transducers and<br />

special test techniques should be employed.<br />

http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/applications/high-temperature-ultrasonic-testing/


This application note contains quick reference information regarding selection<br />

of high temperature transducers and couplants, and important factors<br />

regarding their use. It covers conventional ultrasonic testing of materials at<br />

temperatures up to approximately 500°C or 1000°F. In research applications<br />

involving temperatures higher than that, highly specialized waveguide<br />

techniques are used. They fall outside the scope of this note.<br />

Testing Methods used:<br />

Methods used to increase the useful range for high temperature application<br />

are:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

Delay Line<br />

High temperature Couplants<br />

Testing <strong>Techniques</strong> & Equipment Requirements


Temperature Limitation:<br />

Conventional ultrasonic<br />

transducers 50°C


Temperature Limitation:<br />

Conventional ultrasonic<br />

transducers 50°C


Temperature Limitation:<br />

Conventional ultrasonic<br />

transducers 50°C<br />

http://amazingunseentravel.blogspot.com/2011_08_28_archive.html


Temperature Limitation:<br />

Conventional ultrasonic<br />

transducers 50°C


Temperature Limitation:<br />

Conventional ultrasonic<br />

transducers 50°C<br />

http://www.wisdompetals.com/index.php/photos/138-wonder-of-the-world-crescent-lake-in-gopi-deser


Temperature Limitation:<br />

Conventional ultrasonic<br />

transducers 50°C<br />

http://www.wisdompetals.com/index.php/photos/138-wonder-of-the-world-crescent-lake-in-gopi-deser


敦 煌 大 漠 美 食 -50 度 火 锅 双 塔 鱼<br />

http://www.cc6uu.com/science/article/raiders/2407


High Temperature Conventional UT-<br />

Good Till & No-More.


2.0 Methods used for H.Temperature Scanning<br />

2.1 Transducers- H.Temperature Delay Line Material<br />

Panametrics-NDT high temperature transducers fall into two categories,<br />

■<br />

■<br />

dual element transducers and<br />

delay line transducers.<br />

In both cases, the delay line material (which is internal in the case of duals)<br />

serves as thermal insulation between the active transducer element and the<br />

hot test surface.<br />

For design reasons, there are no high temperature contact or immersion<br />

transducers in the standard product line. High temperature duals and delay<br />

line transducers are available for both thickness gaging and flaw detection<br />

applications. As with all ultrasonic tests, the best transducer for a given<br />

application will be determined by specific test requirements, including the<br />

material, the thickness range, the temperature, and in the case of flaw<br />

detection, the type and size of the relevant flaws.


(1a) Thickness gaging<br />

The most common application for high temperature thickness gaging is<br />

corrosion survey work, the measurement of remaining metal thickness of hot<br />

pipes and tanks with corrosion gages such as Models 38DL PLUS and 45MG.<br />

Most of the transducers that are designed for use with Olympus corrosion<br />

gages are suitable for high temperature use. The commonly used D790<br />

series transducers can be used on surfaces as hot as 500° C or 930° F. For a<br />

complete list of available corrosion gauging duals that includes temperature<br />

specifications, see this link: Corrosion Gage Duals.


For precision thickness gauging applications using the Models 38DL PLUS or<br />

Model 45MG with Single Element software ,such as hot plastics, any of the<br />

standard Micro-scan delay line transducers in the M200 series (including<br />

gage default transducers M202, M206, M207, and M208) can be equipped<br />

with high temperature delay lines. DLHT-1, -2, and -3 delay lines may be<br />

used on surfaces up to 260° C or 500° F. DLHT-101, -201, and -301 delay<br />

lines may be used on surfaces up to 175° C or 350° F. These delay lines are<br />

listed in the Delay Line Option Chart.


In challenging applications requiring low frequency transducers for increased<br />

penetration, the Videoscan Replaceable Face Transducers and appropriate<br />

high temperature delay lines can also be used with 38DL PLUS and 45MG<br />

thickness gages incorporating the HP (high penetration) software option.<br />

Custom transducer setups will be required. Standard delay lines for this<br />

family of transducers can be used in contact with surfaces as hot as 480° C<br />

or 900° F. For a full list of transducers and delay lines, see this link:<br />

Replaceable Face Transducers.


(1b) Flaw detection<br />

As in high temperature thickness gaging applications, high temperature flaw<br />

detection most commonly uses dual element or delay line transducers. All<br />

standard Panametrics-NDT flaw detection duals offer high temperature<br />

capability. Fingertip, Flush Case, and Extended Range duals whose<br />

frequency is 5 MHz or below may be used up to approximately 425° C or<br />

800° F, and higher frequency duals (7.5 and 10 MHz) may be used up to<br />

approximately 175° C or 350° F. For a full list of transducers in this category,<br />

see this link: Flaw Detection Duals.<br />

All of the Videoscan Replaceable Face Transducers can be used with<br />

appropriate high temperature delay lines in flaw detection applications. The<br />

available delay lines for this family of transducers can be used in contact with<br />

surfaces as hot as 480° C or 900° F. For a full list of transducers and delay<br />

lines suitable for various maximum temperatures, see this link: Replaceable<br />

Face Transducers.


<strong>Applications</strong> involving thin materials are often best handled by the delay line<br />

transducers in the V200 series (most commonly the V202, V206, V207, and<br />

V208), any of which can be equipped with high temperature delay lines.<br />

DLHT-1, -2, and -3 delay lines may be used on surfaces up to 260° C or 500°<br />

F. DLHT-101, -201, and -301 delay lines may be used on surfaces up to 175°<br />

C or 350° F. These transducers and delay lines are listed on the Delay Line<br />

Transducer List.<br />

We also offers special high temperature wedges for use with angle beam<br />

transducers, the ABWHT series for use up to 260° C or 500° F and the<br />

ABWVHT series for use up to 480° C or 900° F. Detailed information on<br />

available sizes is available from the Sales Department.


2.2 High Temperature Couplants<br />

Most common ultrasonic couplants such as propylene glycol, glycerin, and<br />

ultrasonic gels will quickly vaporize if used on surfaces hotter than<br />

approximately 100° C or 200° F. Thus, ultrasonic testing at high temperatures<br />

requires specially formulated couplants that will remain in a stable liquid or<br />

paste form without boiling off, burning, or releasing toxic fumes. It is important<br />

to be aware of the specified temperature range for their use, and use them<br />

only within that range. Poor acoustic performance and/or safety hazards may<br />

result from using high temperature couplants beyond their intended range.<br />

At very high temperatures, even specialized high temperature couplants must<br />

be used quickly since they will tend to dry out or solidify and no longer<br />

transmit ultrasonic energy. Dried couplant residue should be removed from<br />

the test surface and the transducer before the next measurement.


Note that normal incidence shear wave coupling is generally not possible at<br />

elevated temperatures because commercial shear wave couplants will liquify<br />

and lose the very high viscosity that is necessary for transmission of shear<br />

waves.<br />

We offer two types of high temperature couplant:<br />

■ Couplant E - Ultratherm Recommended for use between 500° and<br />

970° F (260° to 520° C)<br />

■ Couplant G - Medium Temperature Couplant Recommended for use at<br />

temperatures up to 600° F (315° C).<br />

For a complete list of couplants available from Olympus, along with further<br />

notes on each, please refer to the application note on Ultrasonic Couplants.


Keyword:<br />

Note that normal incidence shear wave coupling is generally not possible at<br />

elevated temperatures because commercial shear wave couplants will liquify<br />

and lose the very high viscosity that is necessary for transmission of shear<br />

waves.<br />

http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/applications/normal-incidence-shear-wave-transducers/<br />

http://static5.olympus-ims.com/data/Flash/shear_wave.swf?rev=3970<br />

http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/ultrasonic-transducers/shear-wave/


2.3 Test <strong>Techniques</strong><br />

The following factors should always be taken into consideration in<br />

establishing a test procedure for any high temperature application:<br />

Transducer Time of Contacts<br />

All standard high temperature transducers are designed with a duty cycle in<br />

mind. Although the delay line insulates the interior of the transducer, lengthy<br />

contact with very hot surfaces will cause significant heat buildup, and<br />

eventually permanent damage to the transducer if the interior temperature<br />

becomes hot enough. For most dual element and delay line transducers, the<br />

recommended duty cycle for surface temperatures between approximately<br />

90° C and 425° C (200° F to 800° F) is no more than ten seconds of contact<br />

with the hot surface (five seconds is recomended), followed by a minimum of<br />

one minute of air cooling. Note that this is guideline only; the ratio of contact<br />

time to cooling time becomes more critical at the upper end of a given<br />

transducer's specified temperature range.


As a general rule, if the outer case of the transducer becomes too hot to<br />

comfortably hold with bare fingers, then the interior temperature of the<br />

transducer is reaching a potentially damaging temperature and the transducer<br />

must be allowed to cool down before testing continues.<br />

Some users have employed water cooling to accelerate the cooling process,<br />

however Olympus publishes no official guidelines for water cooling and its<br />

appropriateness must be determined by the individual user<br />

Keyword:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

10 second contact follows by 60 second air cooling<br />

Water cooling is not guarantee by Olympus NDT


Coupling Technique: The combination of transducer duty cycle<br />

requirements and the tendency of couplants to solidify or boil off at the upper<br />

end of their usable thickness range requires quick work on the part of the<br />

operator. Many users have found the best technique to be to apply a drop of<br />

couplant to the face of the transducer and then press the transducer firmly to<br />

the test surface, without twisting or grinding it (which can cause transducer<br />

wear). Any dried couplant residue should be removed from the transducer tip<br />

between measurements.


2.4 Equipment Functions<br />

Freeze Function<br />

Olympus Epoch series flaw detectors and all thickness gages have freeze<br />

functions that can be used to freeze the displayed waveform and reading. The<br />

freeze function is very useful in high temperature measurements because it<br />

allows the operator to capture a reading and quickly remove the transducer<br />

from the hot surface. With gages, the fast screen update mode should be<br />

used to help minimize contact time.<br />

High Gain Boost<br />

Gain Boost: The 38DL PLUS and 45MG gages have user adjustable gain<br />

boost functions, as do all Epoch series flaw detectors. Because of the higher<br />

attenuation levels associated with high temperature measurements, it is often<br />

useful to increase gain before making measurements.


3.0 High Temperature Testing and Variability<br />

3.1 Velocity Variation:<br />

Sound velocity in all materials changes with temperature, slowing down as<br />

the material heats up. Accurate thickness gaging of hot materials always<br />

requires velocity recalibration. In steel, this velocity change is approximately<br />

1% per 55°C or 100°F change in temperature. (The exact value varies<br />

depending on the alloy.) In plastics and other polymers, this change is much<br />

greater, and can approach 50% per 55°C or 100°F change in temperature up<br />

to the melting point. If a temperature/velocity plot for the material is not<br />

available, then a velocity calibration should be performed on a sample of the<br />

test material at the actual test temperature. The temperature compensation<br />

software function in the 38DL PLUS gage can be used to automatically adjust<br />

velocity for known elevated temperatures based on a programmed<br />

temperature/velocity constant.<br />

Keyword:<br />

■ Velocity change of -1% (minus) per 55°C or 100°F change in temperature<br />

■ Temperature versus velocity plot


Keyword:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

Velocity change of -1% (minus) per 55°C or 100°F change in temperature<br />

Temperature versus velocity plot


3.2 Zero Recalibration:<br />

When performing thickness gaging with dual element transducers, remember<br />

that the zero offset value for a given transducer will change as it heats up due<br />

to changes in transit time through the delay line. Thus, periodic re-zeroing is<br />

necessary to maintain measurement accuracy. With Olympus corrosion<br />

gages this can be quickly and easily done through the gage's auto-zero<br />

function; simply press the 2nd Function > DO ZERO keys.


3.3 Increased Attenuation:<br />

Sound attenuation in all materials increases with temperature, and the effect<br />

is much more pronounced in plastics than in metals or ceramics. In typical<br />

fine grain carbon steel alloys, attenuation at 5 MHz at room temperature is<br />

approximately 2 dB per 100 mm one-way sound path (equivalent to a round<br />

trip path of 50 mm each way). At 500°C or 930°C, attenuation increases to<br />

approximately 15 dB per 100 mm of sound path. This effect can require use<br />

of significantly increased instrument gain when testing over long sound paths<br />

at high temperature, and can also require adjustment to distance/amplitude<br />

correction (DAC) curves or TVG (Time Varied Gain) programs that were<br />

established at room temperature.<br />

Temperature/attenuation effects in polymers are highly material dependent,<br />

but will be typically be several times greater than the above numbers for steel.<br />

In particular, long high temperature delay lines that have heated up may<br />

represent a significant source of total attenuation in a test.


Keyword:<br />

• In typical fine grain carbon steel alloys, attenuation at 5 MHz at room<br />

temperature is approximately 2 dB per 100 mm one-way sound path<br />

(equivalent to a round trip path of 50 mm each way).<br />

• At 500°C or 930°C, attenuation increases to approximately 15 dB per 100<br />

mm of sound path.


3.4 Angular Variation in Wedges:<br />

With any high temperature wedge, sound velocity in the wedge material will<br />

decrease as it heats up, and thus the refracted angle in metals will increase<br />

as the wedge heats up. If this is of concern in a given test, refracted angle<br />

should be verified at actual operating temperature. As a practical matter,<br />

thermal variations during testing will often make precise determination of the<br />

actual refracted angle difficult.<br />

Keyword:<br />

As a practical matter, thermal variations during testing will often make precise<br />

determination of the actual refracted angle difficult.


Discussion: An offshore installation of Topside to Jacket Legs, hot<br />

conventional Ultrasonic Testing at elevated temperature below 500 C was<br />

proposed. What are the critical information to be reviewed?<br />

Hints:<br />

High temperature testing methods used & limitations<br />

Variability due to high temperature & concerns


6.9: Dimension-Measurement <strong>Applications</strong>


6.9.1 Dimension-Measurement <strong>Applications</strong><br />

Ultrasonic inspection methods can be used for measurement of metal<br />

thickness. These same methods can also be used to monitor the deterioration<br />

of a surface and subsequent thinning of a part due to wear or corrosion and to<br />

determine the position of a solid object or liquid material in a closed metallic<br />

cavity.


6.9.2 Thickness measurements<br />

are made using pulse-echo techniques. Resonance techniques were also<br />

used in the past, but have become obsolete. The results can be read on an<br />

oscilloscope screen or on a meter, or they can be printed out. Also, the same<br />

data signals can be fed through gates to operate sorting or marking devices<br />

or to sound alarms. Resonance thickness testing was most often applied to<br />

process control inspection where opposite sides of the test pieces are smooth<br />

and parallel, such as in the inspection of hollow extrusions, drawn tubes, tube<br />

bends, flat sheet and plate, or electroplated parts.<br />

The maximum frequency that can be used for the test determines the<br />

minimum thickness that can be measured. The maximum thickness that can<br />

be measured depends on such test conditions as couplant characteristics,<br />

test frequency, and instrument design and on material type, metallurgical<br />

condition, and surface roughness.


Pulse-echo thickness gages with a digital readout are widely used for<br />

thickness measurement. Pulse-echo testing can measure such great<br />

thickness that it can determine the length of a steel reinforcing rod in a<br />

concrete structure, provided one end of the rod is accessible for contact by<br />

the search unit. Although pulse-echo testing is capable of measuring<br />

considerable thicknesses, near-field effects make the use of pulse-echo<br />

testing ineffective on very thin materials.


6.9.3 Position measurements<br />

Position measurements of solid parts or liquid materials in closed metallic<br />

cavities are usually made with pulse echo type equipment. One technique is<br />

to look for changes in back reflection intensity as the position of the search<br />

unit is changed. In one variation of this technique, the oil level in differential<br />

housings was checked to see if the automated equipment used to put the oil<br />

in the housing on an-assembly line had malfunctioned. The test developed for<br />

this application utilized a dual-gated pulse-echo system that employed a 1.6-<br />

MHz immersion-type search unit with a thin, oil filled rubber gland over its<br />

face. The search unit was automatically placed against the outside surface of<br />

the housing just below the proper oil level, as shown in Fig. 60(a).


With oil at the correct level, sufficient beam energy was transmitted across<br />

the boundary between the housing wall and the oil to attenuate the reflected<br />

beam so that multiple back reflections were all contained in the first gate (Fig.<br />

60b). The lack of oil at the correct level allowed the multiple back reflections<br />

to spill over into the second gate (Fig. 60c). Thus, the test was a fail-safe test<br />

that signaled "no test" (no signal in the first gate), "go" (signals in the first gate<br />

only), and "no go" (signals in both gates).


Fig. 60 Method of determining correct oil level in on automobile differential<br />

housing by use of an ultrasonic pulse-echo system. See text.


In another position measurement system, a set of two contact-type 4-MHz<br />

search units was utilized in a through transmission pitch-catch arrangement to<br />

determine the movement of a piston in a hydraulic oil accumulator as both<br />

precharge nitrogen-gas pressure and standby oil pressure varied (Fig. 61).<br />

The two search units were placed 180° apart on the outside surface of the<br />

accumulator wall at a position on the oil side of the piston, as shown in Fig.<br />

61.<br />

When a high energy pulse was sent from the transmitting unit, the beam was<br />

able to travel straight through the oil, and a strong signal was picked up by<br />

the receiving unit. However, as the search units were moved toward the<br />

piston (see locations drawn in phantom in Fig. 61), the sloping sides of the<br />

recess in the piston bottom deflected the beam so that very little signal was<br />

detected by the receiving unit.


Fig. 61 Setup for determining the position of a piston in a hydraulic oil<br />

accumulator by use of two contact search units utilizing a through<br />

transmission arrangement


Q144. A thin sheet may be inspected with the ultrasonic wavw direction<br />

normal to the surface by observing:<br />

A. The amplitude of the front surface reflection<br />

B. The multiple reflection pattern<br />

C. All front surface reflection<br />

D. None of the above


6.10: In-Service Inspection


In-Service Inspection<br />

The methods described above are applied in the course of and immediately<br />

after the production process and are therefore called production tests. To<br />

survey highly stressed parts, especially in power plants, repeated tests or inservice<br />

inspections are becoming more and more important. In these<br />

inspections any defects identified earlier but not being a cause for rejection<br />

can be observed for any changes caused by the service conditions. In<br />

addition service-produced defects must be detected, these being mainly<br />

cracks caused by thermal shock, fatigue or creep, or by corrosion attack.


In-Service Inspection- Testing for fatigue cracks on crankshafts and<br />

crankpins. a Without bore; b with bore


In-Service Inspection- Oblique or skewed fatigue cracks on crankpins


In-Service Inspection- (a) Crack test on press columns, pump rods, etc.<br />

(b) Crack test on thread in the shadow of a sound beam; schematic screen<br />

picture above


In-Service Inspection- (a) Probe for detecting fatigue cracks in turbine discs<br />

(design Krautkriimer-Branson) (b) Detection of cracks in riveted turbine<br />

blades


In-Service Inspection- (a) Testing methods for conical defects in a bolt<br />

(b) Testing for fatigue cracks in bolts


In-Service Inspection- (a) Cross-section through a leaf spring for railway<br />

cars with quenching crack showing testing with small angle probe or normal<br />

probe. The use of surface waves is unfavorable due to roughness<br />

(b)Testing a helical spring for quenching cracks, using surface waves


6.11: Casting


Casting<br />

In castings flaw detection is almost exclusively concerned with manufacturing<br />

defects and only rarely as in-service inspection. Suitable testing techniques<br />

and the subsequent evaluation of indications in castings is very different from<br />

the testing of forged and worked material so that the differences must not be<br />

forgotten or difficulties can occur. In-service inspection, as in the case of<br />

forgings, depends on the local stresses and the piece geometry so it is not<br />

necessary to treat it specially in this section.


Casting- Typical casting defects and their detection methods


Casting


Casting- Detection of shrinkage cavities with normal and angle probes


6.12: Bonded Joint


Inspection of Bonded Joints<br />

If the shape of a joint is favorable, ultrasonic inspection can be used to<br />

determine the soundness of joints bonded either adhesively or by any of the<br />

various metallurgical methods, including brazing and soldering. Both pulseecho<br />

and resonance techniques have been used to evaluate bond quality in<br />

brazed joints.<br />

A babbitted sleeve bearing is a typical part having a metallurgical bond that is<br />

ultrasonically inspected for flaws. The bond between babbitt and backing<br />

shell is inspected with a straight-beam pulse-echo technique, using a contacttype<br />

search unit applied to the outside of the steel shell. A small-diameter<br />

search unit is used to ensure adequate contact with the shell through the<br />

couplant. Before inspection, the outside of the steel shell and the inside of the<br />

cast babbitt liner are machined to a maximum surface roughness of 3.20 μm<br />

(125 μ in.) (but the liner is not machined to final thickness).


During inspection, the oscilloscope screen normally shows three indications:<br />

the initial pulse, a small echo from the bond line (due to differences in<br />

acoustical impedance of steel and babbitt), and the back reflection from the<br />

inside surface of the liner. Regions where the bond line indication is minimum<br />

are assumed to have an acceptable bond. Where the bond line signal<br />

increases, the bond is questionable. Where there is no back reflection at all<br />

from the inside surface of the liner (babbitt), there is no bond.<br />

Inspection of other types of bonded joints is often done in a manner similar to<br />

that described above for babbitted bearings. An extensive discussion of the<br />

ultrasonic inspection of various types of adhesive-bonded joints (including<br />

two-component lap joints, three component sandwich structures, and<br />

multiple-component laminated structures) is available in the article "Adhesive-<br />

Bonded Joints" in this Volume.


6.13: Corrosion Monitoring


Corrosion Monitoring<br />

Ultrasonic inspection can be used for the in situ monitoring of corrosion by<br />

measuring the thickness of vessel walls with ultrasonic thickness gages. The<br />

advantage of this method is that internal corrosion of a vessel can be<br />

monitored without penetration.<br />

There are, however, some disadvantages. Serious problems may exist in<br />

equipment that has a metallurgically bonded internal lining, because it is not<br />

obvious from which surface the returning signal will originate. A poor surface<br />

finish, paint, or a vessel at high or low temperature may also complicate the<br />

use of contact piezoelectric transducers (although this difficulty might be<br />

addressed by noncontact in situ inspection with an EMA transducer).


Despite these drawbacks, ultrasonic thickness measurements are widely<br />

used to determine corrosion rates. To obtain a corrosion rate, a series of<br />

thickness measurements is made over an interval of time, and the metal loss<br />

per unit time is determined from the measurement samples. Hand-held<br />

ultrasonic thickness gages are suitable for these measurements and are<br />

relatively easy to use.<br />

However, depending on the type of transducer used, the ultrasonic thickness<br />

method can overestimate metal thicknesses when the remaining thickness is<br />

under approximately 1.3 mm (0.05 in.). Another corrosion inspection method<br />

consists of monitoring back-surface roughness with ultrasonic techniques.<br />

The following example describes an application of this method in the<br />

monitoring of nuclear waste containers.


6.14: Crack Monitoring


Crack Monitoring<br />

Laboratory and in-service monitoring of the initiation and propagation of<br />

cracks that are relatively slow growing (such as fatigue cracks, stress-rupture<br />

cracks, and stress-corrosion cracks) has been accomplished with ultrasonic<br />

techniques. An example of the ultrasonic detection of stress-rupture cracks<br />

resulting from creep in reformer-furnace headers is given in the article<br />

"Boilers and Pressure Vessels" in this Volume. A relatively new and improved<br />

approach for monitoring the growth of cracks is done with ultrasonic imaging<br />

techniques.


Monitoring of fatigue cracks in parts during laboratory tests and while in<br />

service in the field has been extensively done using ultrasonic techniques.<br />

Reference 13 describes the use of surface waves to detect the initiation of<br />

cracks in cylindrical compression-fatigue test pieces having a circumferential<br />

notch. The surface waves, which were produced by four angle-beam search<br />

units on the circumference of each test piece, were able to follow the contour<br />

of the notch and detect the cracks at the notch root.<br />

Monitoring the crack-growth rate was accomplished by periodically removing<br />

the cracked test piece from the stressing rig and measuring the crack size by<br />

straight-beam, pulse-echo immersion inspection. It was found necessary to<br />

break open some of the cracked test pieces (using impact at low temperature)<br />

and visually measure the crack to establish an accurate calibration curve of<br />

indication height versus crack size.


The use of pulse-echo techniques for monitoring fatigue cracks in pressure<br />

vessels in laboratory tests is described in Ref 14. These techniques use<br />

several overlapping angle-beam (shear wave) search units, which are glued<br />

in place to ensure reproducible results as fatigue testing proceeded. The inservice<br />

monitoring of fatigue cracking of machine components is often<br />

accomplished without removing the component from its assembly.


For example, 150 mm (6 in.) diam, 8100 mm (320 in.) long shafts used in<br />

pressure rolls in papermaking machinery developed fatigue cracks in their<br />

500 mm (20 in.) long threaded end sections after long and severe service.<br />

These cracks were detected and measured at 3-month intervals, using a<br />

contact-type straight-beam search unit placed on the end of each shaft,<br />

without removing the shaft from the machine.<br />

When the cracks were found to cover over 25% of the cross section of a shaft,<br />

the shaft was removed and replaced. In another case, fatigue cracking in a<br />

weld joining components of the shell of a ball mill 4.3 m (14 ft) in diameter by<br />

9.1 m (30 ft) long was monitored using contact type angle-beam search units.<br />

The testing was done at 3-month intervals until a crack was detected; then it<br />

was monitored more frequently. When a crack reached a length of 150 mm (6<br />

in.), milling was halted and the crack repaired.


6.15: Stress Measurements


Stress Measurements<br />

With ultrasonic techniques, the velocity of ultrasonic waves in materials can<br />

be measured and related to stress (Ref 16). These techniques rely on the<br />

small velocity changes caused by the presence of stress, which is known as<br />

an acousto-elastic effect. The technique is difficult to apply because of the<br />

very small changes in velocity with changes in stress and because of the<br />

difficulty in distinguishing stress effects from material variations (such as<br />

texture; see Ref 17). However, with the increased ability to time the arrival of<br />

ultrasonic pulses accurately (±1 ns), the technique has become feasible for a<br />

few practical applications, such as the measurement of axial loads in steel<br />

bolts and the measurement of residual stress (Ref 5).<br />

.


The real limitation of this technique is that in many materials the ultrasonic<br />

pulse becomes distorted, which can reduce the accuracy of the measurement.<br />

One way to avoid this problem is to measure the phase difference between<br />

two-tone bursts by changing the frequency to keep the phase difference<br />

constant (Ref 5). Small specimens are used in a water bath, and the pulses<br />

received from the front and back surfaces overlap. The presence of stress<br />

also rotates the plane of polarization of polarized shear waves, and there is<br />

some correlation between the angle of rotation and the magnitude of the<br />

stress. Measurement of this rotation can be used to measure the internal<br />

stress averaged over the volume of material traversed by the ultrasonic beam.


6.16: Bond Testing


The real limitation of


The real limitation of


The real limitation of


The real limitation of


The real limitation of


The real limitation of


6.App-1: TOFD Introduction<br />

NOTE: Not in the exam syllabus or BOK


6.App-1.1 TOFD Basic Theory<br />

TOFD is usually performed using longitudinal waves as the primary detection<br />

method. Ultrasonic sensors are placed on each side of the weld. One sensor<br />

sends the ultrasonic beam into the material and the other sensor receives<br />

reflected and diffracted ultrasound from anomalies and geometric reflectors.


TOFD provides a wide area of coverage with a single beam by exploiting<br />

ultrasonic beam spread theory inside the wedge and the inspected material.<br />

When the beam comes in contact with the tip of a flaw, or crack, diffracted<br />

energy is cast in all directions. Measuring the time of flight of the diffracted<br />

beams enables accurate and reliable flaw detection and sizing, even if the<br />

crack is off-oriented to the initial beam direction.<br />

During typical TOFD inspections, A-scans are collected and used to create B-<br />

scan (side view) images of the weld. Analysis is done on the acquisition unit<br />

or in post-analysis software, positioning cursors to measure the length and<br />

through-wall height of flaws.<br />

Keywords:<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

Tip Diffraction<br />

Off-oriented to the initial beam direction<br />

Time of Flight<br />

A-scan / B-scan<br />

Post analysis software


6.App-1.2<br />

Main Benefits of TOFD for Weld Inspection<br />

• Based on diffraction, so relatively indifferent to weld bevel angles and flaw<br />

orientation<br />

• Uses time of arrival of signals received from crack tips for accurate defect<br />

positioning and sizing<br />

• Precise sizing capability makes it an ideal flaw monitoring method<br />

• Quick to set up and perform an inspection, as a single beam offers a large<br />

area of coverage<br />

• Rapid scanning with imaging and full data recording<br />

• Can also be used for corrosion inspections<br />

• Required equipment is more economical than phased array, due to<br />

conventional nature (single pulser and receiver) and use of conventional<br />

probes<br />

• Highly sensitive to all weld flaw types


TOFD offers rapid weld inspection with excellent flaw detection and sizing<br />

capacities. The diffraction technique provides critical sizing capability with<br />

relative indifference to bevel angle or flaw orientation. TOFD can be utilized<br />

on its own or in conjunction with other NDT techniques.


6.App-1.3<br />

6.App-1.3.1 The Theory<br />

More Reading on Time of Flight Diffraction (TOFD)<br />

Time of flight diffraction (TOFD) detects flaws using the signals diffracted from<br />

the flaw’s extremities. Two angled compression wave probes are used in<br />

transmit-receive mode, one each side of the weld. The beam divergence is<br />

such that the majority of the thickness is inspected, although, for thicker<br />

components, more than one probe separation may be required. When the<br />

sound strikes the tip of a crack, this acts as a secondary emitter which<br />

scatters sound out in all directions, some in the direction of the receiving<br />

probe. A ‘lateral wave’ travelling at the same velocity as the compression<br />

waves, travels directly from the transmitter to the receiver. The time difference<br />

between the lateral wave and the diffracted signal from the flaw<br />

provides a measure of its distance from the scanned surface.<br />

If the flaw is large enough in the through wall dimension, it may<br />

be possible to resolve the tip diffracted signals from its top and<br />

bottom, thereby allowing the through wall height of the flaw to be<br />

measured.<br />

http://www.iteglobal.com/services/advanced-ndt/time-of-flight-diffraction-tofd/


Due to the low amplitude of the diffracted signals, TOFD is usually carried out<br />

using a preamplifier and hardware designed to improve signal-to-noise<br />

performance. As the probes are scanned along the weld, the RF A-Scan<br />

signals are digitised and displayed in the form of a grey-scale image showing<br />

flaws as alternating white and black fringes.<br />

Depending on which direction the probes are moved over the component<br />

surface, it is possible to construct ‘end-view’; (B-scan TOFD) or ‘side-view’<br />

(D-scan TOFD) cross-sectional slices. TOFD can also utilise Synthetic<br />

Aperture focusing or beam modelling software to minimise the effects of<br />

beam divergence, thereby providing more accurate location and sizing<br />

information.


TOFD is generally recognised as the most accurate ultrasonic technique for<br />

measuring the through-wall height of planar flaws that lie perpendicular to the<br />

surface and as a method for detecting and quantifying crevice corrosion at the<br />

weld root. At present, national standards for the application of TOFD exist,<br />

however, no acceptance criteria have been agreed upon.<br />

The TOFD technique is suited for the detection and sizing of all types of<br />

embedded flaws, especially those planar in nature. However, the detection of<br />

small near the scan surface flaws can be more difficult due to the presence of<br />

the lateral wave response which often occupies several millimeters of the<br />

depth axis on images.


Tips Diffractions


TOFD<br />

Transmitter<br />

Receiver<br />

Crack<br />

Back-wall echo<br />

Diffracted wave from upper end of crack<br />

Diffracted wave from lower end of crack<br />

Crack height can be calculate by measuring propagation<br />

delayed time of diffraction wave<br />

Diffracted<br />

wave from<br />

upper end of<br />

crack<br />

Lateral wave<br />

Diffracted wave from lower end of crack


TOFD


6.App-1.2 Application Examples<br />

■<br />

TOFD for Weld Root Corrosion and Erosion<br />

For piping and other flow systems, certain conditions exist that lead to<br />

corrosion and erosion in the weld root and the heat-affected zone (HAZ) of<br />

the weld. The contributing factors are often metallurgical, chemical, or flow<br />

related, and the resulting metal loss can lead to failure of the weld/base metal.<br />

The shape of the corroded or eroded weld or base metal can make ultrasonic<br />

inspection extremely difficult to apply, thus impeding accurate detection and<br />

measurement of anomalies.<br />

The time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) technique proves to be a valid option for<br />

evaluating weld root corrosion and erosion, as well as similar conditions such<br />

as FAC (flow-accelerated corrosion). The goal of any of these inspections is<br />

to accurately measure the wall thickness, the weld, and the HAZ. The<br />

unpredictable shape of the remaining material often makes pulse-echo<br />

ultrasonic inspection ineffective.<br />

http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/applications/tofd-for-weld-root-corrosion-and-erosion/


TOFD has been used for some time for general weld inspections. It has<br />

proven to be a rapid and easily deployable method with an excellent capacity<br />

for sizing. One of the inherent strengths of TOFD for detection and sizing<br />

purposes is its relative indifference to the orientation of defects because of its<br />

primary use of diffracted versus reflected energy.<br />

The TOFD technique utilizes two transducers: a transmitter transducer floods<br />

the inspected region with sound in the forward direction; on the opposite side<br />

of the weld, a receiver transducer is positioned to receive diffracted and<br />

reflected energy from the back wall or from anomalies present in the region.<br />

Common pulse-echo techniques can be misdirected by the shape of the<br />

region, resulting in imprecise measurement and assessment.


Figure 5-3 – Preferential weld corrosion in lean amine (Reference 5)


Figure 5-2 – Hot Lean Amine Corrosion of Carbon Steel:


Weld Root Corrosion and Erosion<br />

Pulse-echo shear wave beam being reflected at an off angle.<br />

Illustration of diffracted energy reflecting off weld root/HAZ in all directions.


For these types of weld inspections, TOFD is typically performed from three<br />

positions for each weld: (1) centered on the weld, (2) offset to the left, and (3)<br />

offset to the right.<br />

Scanning from these particular positions helps to achieve the best results.<br />

This method ensures detection of the highest point of material loss,<br />

determines from which side of the weld the erosion/corrosion indications are<br />

originating, and eliminates any masking caused by the back wall signal.<br />

Depending on the instrument, these scans can be run concurrently or in<br />

separate acquisitions.


TOFD is deployed by scanning the weld with a semiautomatic or fully<br />

automatic scanner. Scan settings are set to determine scan resolution. The<br />

resulting data file can be saved indefinitely for review and comparison to<br />

future scans. After data is acquired, it is analyzed to identify any areas of<br />

concern, either directly on the instrument or in post-analysis software. Shifts<br />

in data (time/depth) are measured in order to assess the severity of metal<br />

loss. The cursors can then be positioned to define areas for depth or<br />

thickness measurement readings. Weld defects such as porosity, lack of<br />

fusion, and cracking can also be detected when scanning for corrosion and<br />

erosion.


Scan of weld with cursor positioned on an uncorroded area; A-scan shows<br />

good lateral wave and back wall signal with no indications in between.


Scan of weld with cursor positioned on a corroded area; A-scan shows shift in<br />

time of back wall signal from material loss.


Measurement of good area shows thickness as 7.39 mm; TOFD (m-r) reading<br />

shows the distance between the positioned cursors.


Measurement of corroded area shows thickness as 5.28 mm; cursors are<br />

positioned at top of plate (0) and highest point of material loss. In this<br />

example, there is 2.11 mm of material loss due to corrosion.


6.11.3.3TOFD for Corrosion Measurement Equipment (Typical)<br />

• OmniScan SX or MX2 (PA or UT models, depending on the number of<br />

channels desired and if phased array capability is needed).<br />

• TOFD circumferential scanner (HST-Lite or similar, depending on the<br />

desired number of probe holders and other application specifics; for<br />

example, pipe versus plate).<br />

• TOFD probe and wedges (various frequencies, angles, and materials).<br />

• Couplant delivery system, WTR-SPRAYER-8L or similar.<br />

• TomoView Analysis or OmniPC post-analysis software (optional).


6.App-1.3.4<br />

TOFD Benefits for Corrosion/Erosion Measurement<br />

• Rapid scanning.<br />

• Cost effective.<br />

• Auditable and retrievable permanent data sets.<br />

• Accurate sizing capability.<br />

• Excellent detection, even on irregularly shaped areas of metal loss.<br />

• Fast post-acquisition analysis results.<br />

• Portable and user-friendly TOFD scanning packages.


TOFD for Weld- TOFD Parallel Scanning


6.App-1.3.5<br />

Overview on Scanning Direction<br />

Most typical TOFD inspections are performed with the send and receive<br />

transducers on opposite sides of the weld and scanning movement parallel to<br />

the weld axis. The main purpose of this “perpendicular” (defined by beam to<br />

weld relationship) scanning is to quickly perform weld inspection with the weld<br />

cap or re-enforcement in place. This technique can give location in the scan<br />

axis, the indication length, height of indication and flaw characterization<br />

information. One of the weaknesses of this technique is the lack of index<br />

positioning (or where between the probes) the indication is located. This<br />

information is usually obtained with complimentary pulse echo ultrasonics<br />

when the weld is left in place.


■<br />

Perpendicular Scanning<br />

Scanning direction “parallel” to the weld axis. Beam direction “perpendicular”<br />

to the weld axis.<br />

? Carriage movement<br />

direction<br />

One of the weaknesses of this technique is the lack of index positioning (or<br />

where between the probes) the indication is located.


■<br />

Parallel TOFD scanning:<br />

Where the scan direction and beam direction are the same is less used, for<br />

obvious reasons of not being able to cover the entire length of weld rapidly,<br />

more complex movement pattern required of scanner mechanisms, and<br />

complexity of the data output of an entire weld inspected. This technique does<br />

have advantages when it is possible to be performed.


Typical “Perpendicular” Weld Scanning Setup and Data Collected. Data is<br />

side view of weld from scan start to scan finish down the weld. Position of<br />

encoder and scanning direction are highlighted.


Typical “Parallel” Weld Scanning Setup and Data Collected. Data is side view<br />

of weld from scan start to scan finish across the weld. Position of encoder and<br />

scanning direction are highlighted.


■<br />

Benefit of TOFD Parallel Scanning<br />

Although perpendicular TOFD scanning down the weld can give highly<br />

accurate depth measurement, generally speaking a parallel scan will give<br />

more accurate depth information as well as flaw information, and location in<br />

the index position in the weld. With perpendicular scanning, no index position<br />

is possible without multiple offset scans being performed or complimentary<br />

NDT techniques to position the flaw. In parallel scanning Index position is<br />

ascertained by locating the minimum time peak, which corresponds to when<br />

the indication is centered between the two probes. For these reasons this<br />

technique is often used in critical crack sizing inspections, as well as change<br />

monitoring, in other words, monitoring a crack or other defect for growth until<br />

it reaches a critical level at which time it is repaired or replaced. For these<br />

reasons the technique is often performed on critical components that are<br />

costly to shut down for repair, often in the Power Generation industry. More<br />

information is often gathered from the flaw as diffraction occurs across the<br />

flaw instead of just down the flaw.


6.App-1.3.6 Further Reading- Introduction to Phased Array<br />

• http://www.olympus-ims.com/en/ndt-tutorials/intro/ut/


The Experts at work.


Break Time<br />

mms://a588.l3944020587.c39440.g.lm.akamaistream.net/D/588/39440/v0001/reflector:20587?BBC-<br />

UID=e5203c9d59fef1a79c12d8c601e839f58db16f7d5d6448f55674c540f1856834<strong>&amp</strong>;SSO2-UID


Break Time<br />

mms://a588.l3944020587.c39440.g.lm.akamaistream.net/D/588/39440/v0001/reflector:20587?BBC-<br />

UID=e5203c9d59fef1a79c12d8c601e839f58db16f7d5d6448f55674c540f1856834<strong>&amp</strong>;SSO2-UID


Break Time<br />

mms://a588.l3944020587.c39440.g.lm.akamaistream.net/D/588/39440/v0001/reflector:20587?BBC-<br />

UID=e5203c9d59fef1a79c12d8c601e839f58db16f7d5d6448f55674c540f1856834<strong>&amp</strong>;SSO2-UID


Break Time


Sail Off

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!