28.08.2014 Views

Nuss, Roger C. Infrared Laser Bone Ablation. 1988.

Nuss, Roger C. Infrared Laser Bone Ablation. 1988.

Nuss, Roger C. Infrared Laser Bone Ablation. 1988.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Laser</strong>s in Surgery and Medicine 8:381-391 (1988)<br />

<strong>Infrared</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong><br />

<strong>Roger</strong> C. <strong>Nuss</strong>, BS, Richard L. Fabian, MD, Rajabrata Sarkar, BS, and<br />

Carmen A. Puliafito, MD<br />

Department of Otolaryngology and the <strong>Laser</strong> Research Laboratory, Department of<br />

Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston<br />

The bone ablation characteristics of five infrared lasers, including<br />

three pulsed lasers (Nd:YAG, X = 1,064 pm; Hol:YSGG, X = 2.10 pm;<br />

and Erb:YAG, X = 2.94 pm) and two continuous-wave lasers (NdYAG,<br />

X = 1.064 pm; and C02, X = 10.6 pm), were studied. All laser ablations<br />

were performed in vitro, using moist, freshly dissected calvarium of<br />

guinea pig skulls. Quantitative etch rates of the three pulsed lasers<br />

were calculated. Light microscopy of histologic sections of ablated<br />

bone revealed a zone of tissue damage of 10 to 15 pm adjacent to the<br />

lesion edge in the case of the pulsed Nd:YAG and the Erb:YAG lasers,<br />

from 20 to 90 pm zone of tissue damage for bone ablated by the<br />

Ho1:YSGG laser, and 60 to 135 pm zone of tissue damage in the case of<br />

the two continuous-wave lasers. Possible mechanisms of bone ablation<br />

and tissue damage are discussed.<br />

Key words: COz, Erb:YAG, Hol:YSGG, Nd:YAG<br />

I NTRO D U CTl ON<br />

Previously published studies of lasers and<br />

bone-cutting have largely centered upon the COZ<br />

laser in both the continuous-wave and rapid superpulsed<br />

modes to perform laser osteotomies [l-61.<br />

These investigations have compared C02 laser osteotomies<br />

performed in animals with similar lesions<br />

produced by a rotating bur drill or a handheld<br />

saw by radiographic, histologic, and mechanical<br />

torsion testing methods. Healing studies have<br />

been performed, demonstrating a delay in healing<br />

of the C02 laser osteotomy as opposed to mechan-<br />

ically-produced lesions [3,4,6,7]. The COZ laser has<br />

been associated with a thermal mechanism of bone<br />

ablation, with resulting coagulation, carbonization,<br />

and vaporization of living tissues. The carbon<br />

char produced may cause a foreign body-type reaction.<br />

More recently, several investigators have<br />

studied both the argon laser and the C02 laser as<br />

a means of producing a small hole in the footplate<br />

beneath the stapes of the middle ear (stapedotomy)<br />

in the surgical treatment of otosclerosis [8-131.<br />

With the recent development of several solidstate<br />

crystal lasers operating in the infrared wavelengths,<br />

it has become interesting to examine their<br />

efficacy in ablating biologic materials. Already<br />

the Ho1:YSGG and the Erb:YAG lasers have been<br />

used to ablate cornea, sclera, and other ocular<br />

structures [14]. Margolis TI, Farnath DA, Destro<br />

0 1988 Alan R. Liss, Inc.<br />

M, Puliafito CA: Erbium-YAG laser surgery on<br />

experimental vitreous membranes in rabbits<br />

(submitted for publication, 1987); Margolis TI,<br />

Farnath DA, Puliafho CA: Mid-infrared laser sclerostomy<br />

(submitted for publication, 1987) However,<br />

there has been very little work done to<br />

examine their bone cutting characteristics.<br />

This study was performed to compare the in<br />

uitro bone ablation characteristics of several infrared<br />

lasers, including three pulsed lasers<br />

(Nd:YAG, X = 1.064 pm; Hol:YSGG, X = 2.10 pm;<br />

and Erb:YAG, X = 2.94 pm) and two continuouswave<br />

lasers (Nd:YAG, X = 1.064 pm; and C02, X =<br />

10.6 pm). The histologic appearance of bone ablations<br />

from each of the lasers was compared, and<br />

the quantitative cutting efficiency (etch rate) of<br />

the three pulsed lasers was determined.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

<strong>Laser</strong>s<br />

Five lasers with infrared light output were<br />

studied. These included three pulsed lasers<br />

(Nd:YAG, X = 1.064 pm; Hol:YSGG, A = 2.10 pm;<br />

Accepted for publication April 29, <strong>1988.</strong><br />

Address reprint requests to Richard L. Fabian, M.D., Department<br />

of Otolaryngology, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA<br />

02114.


382 Nus et al<br />

and Erb:YAG, h = 2.94 pm) and two continuouswave<br />

lasers (Nd:YAG, h = 1.064 pm; and C02, X<br />

= 10.6 pm). The laser type and model, operating<br />

characteristics, and experimental parameters are<br />

detailed in Table 1. For each laser, the beam was<br />

focused to a circular spot with a spherical lens<br />

(bench-mounted in all cases except for the C02<br />

laser, which was a clinical unit). The size of the<br />

focal spot was dependent on the focal distance of<br />

the lens and the laser wavelength, and varied<br />

with the energy or power level.<br />

U<br />

Measurements<br />

Delivered pulse energy (pulsed lasers) or delivered<br />

power (continuous-wave lasers) was measured<br />

with a Scientech Model 362 Power and<br />

Energy Meter (Scientech, Boulder, CO). At each<br />

energy or power setting, beam spot size was determined<br />

by placing a piece of developed photographic<br />

film into the focal point of the beam and<br />

measuring the etched spot under a calibrated ocular.<br />

With these two measurements, radiant exposure<br />

(J/cm2) or irradiance (W/cm2) was calculated.<br />

<strong>Bone</strong> Tissue<br />

All infrared laser bone ablation studies were<br />

performed on guinea pig skull calvaria. Guinea<br />

pigs (Hartley strain, 800-1,000 gm, female) were<br />

sacrificed with a lethal injection of T-61 Euthanasia<br />

solution (embutramide 200 mg/ml, mebezonium<br />

iodide 50 mg/ml, tetracaine hydrochloride 5<br />

mg/ml; Taylor Pharmacal Co., Decatur, IL). The<br />

calvarium of the skull was immediately dissected,<br />

wrapped in gauze moistened with normal saline,<br />

and refrigerated until use within the next 12<br />

hours. Care was taken to ensure that the bone was<br />

kept moist during experimentation, except for one<br />

series of ablations with the Erb:YAG laser in<br />

which the bone was purposely dried in an oven at<br />

55°C for 12 hr. This was done in order to study<br />

laser ablation of bone in which unbound water had<br />

been removed.<br />

Etch Rate Calculation<br />

For each of the three pulsed lasers, a series<br />

of ablations were performed at several different<br />

radiant exposures. The endpoint for laser ablation<br />

was chosen to be perforation of the calvarium, as<br />

detected by visualizing the laser beam etch a piece<br />

of developed photographic film held directly behind<br />

the bone specimen. At the pulse repetition<br />

rates of 1 or 2 pulses per second used in this study,<br />

the endpoint was quite distinct and was precise to<br />

f 1 pulse. Following laser ablation of the bone


specimen, the thickness of the calvarium at the<br />

point of ablation was measured with a micrometer<br />

with a point-like contact surface (Starrett Model<br />

210A-P micrometer, L.S. Starrett Co., Athol, MA).<br />

With this information, the etch rate (micron bone<br />

ablated per pulse) was calculated at each radiant<br />

exposure.<br />

Histology<br />

Specimens were processed for histology in the<br />

following manner. The ablation site and 1 to 1.5<br />

mm of surrounding bone were cut from the calvarium<br />

with a hand-held jigsaw. Individual ablation<br />

specimens were fixed in modified Karnofsky 's fixer<br />

(2% paraformaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde, 0.1<br />

M sodium cacodylate buffer) for a minimum of 3<br />

days. <strong>Bone</strong> specimens were then rinsed in phosphate<br />

buffersd saline for 2 hours, and decalcified<br />

in a commercially prepared solution (Decalcifier 11<br />

Solution, Surgipath Medical Industries, Inc.,<br />

Graystake, IL) for a period of 7 days, including at<br />

least ten changes of decalcifying solution. Specimens<br />

were then dehydrated through an extended<br />

graded ethanol series, and embedded in JB-4<br />

methacrylate embedding compound (Polysciences,<br />

Inc., Warrington, PA). Sections of the bone ablations<br />

were cut parallel to the axis of the beam<br />

path at a thickness of 2 pm. Prepared slides were<br />

stained with Stevenol's blue histologic stain and<br />

examined under light microscopy.<br />

<strong>Infrared</strong> Spectrophotometry<br />

A Perkin-Elmer Lambda 9 WNISINIR spectrophotometer<br />

was used to measure the infrared<br />

absorption of nondecalcified bone in the region of<br />

1.0 to 3.2 pm wavelengths. The bone sample studied<br />

was a piece of dehydrated nondecalcified compact<br />

bone that had been ground to a thickness of<br />

20 pm and mounted on a glass slide. A similar<br />

glass slide and mounting glue preparation was<br />

used as a reference standard in the spectrophotometer.<br />

<strong>Infrared</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong><br />

100,<br />

m.<br />

A<br />

-: 80.<br />

=<br />

. 70.<br />

-<br />

.-<br />

5 60.<br />

<<br />

5<br />

E, 40.<br />

-<br />

5 30.<br />

o!<br />

c<br />

" 20.<br />

iz<br />

10<br />

0<br />

300.<br />

" n<br />

-<br />

< 250.<br />

2<br />

a<br />

200.<br />

" 5<br />

m<br />

E,<br />

Y<br />

150.<br />

"<br />

a<br />

= 100.<br />

L<br />

.-<br />

"<br />

Y<br />

so.<br />

Ho1:YSGG <strong>Laser</strong><br />

383<br />

0 t<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

Radiant Expoaurr (J/crn*)<br />

Fig. 1. Pulsed NdYAG (A = 1.064 pm) bone ablation: mean<br />

etch rate ( pm bone ablatedpulse) versus radiant exposure (J/<br />

cm'). Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Linear<br />

regression was performed on all individual data points in the<br />

radiant exposure range of 8.0 to 22.5 J/cm2.<br />

. . _ . _ . . ~ _ . . . _<br />

Fig. 2. Ho1:YSGG (A = 2.10 pm) bone ablation: etch rate<br />

(pm bone ablatedpulse) versus radiant exposure (J/cm2). All<br />

data points are indicated.<br />

.<br />

D<br />

RESULTS<br />

Etch Rates<br />

Plots of etch rate (micron of bone ablated per<br />

pulse) versus radiant exposure (J/cm2) for the three<br />

pulsed lasers are presented in Figures 1-3. In addition,<br />

Figure 4 displays the etch rate versus radiant<br />

exposure plot of Erb:YAG laser ablation of<br />

dry guinea pig calvaria. The average number of<br />

pulses delivered until perforation at each radiant<br />

exposure and the range of thicknesses of calvaria<br />

used with the three pulsed lasers is summarized<br />

01 *. , . .. . , . , . , .<br />

0 20 40 60 80 I00<br />

Radiant Exporurc (JtcmZ)<br />

Fig. 3. Erb:YAG (A = 2.94 pm) bone ablation: etch rate ( pm<br />

bone ablatedpulse) versus radiant exposure (J/cm2X All data<br />

points are indicated.<br />

in Table 2. The slope of the linear regression curve<br />

(reported as micron of bone ablated per pulse per<br />

J/cm2), the range of radiant exposures over which<br />

the linear regression was performed, the coeffi-<br />

0


384 Nus et al<br />

f<br />

120, t<br />

I<br />

I<br />

1<br />

80-<br />

i 20/<br />

Erb:VAG <strong>Laser</strong>; Dry bone specimen<br />

i<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 SO<br />

Radiant Cxposurc (J/crn*)<br />

Fig. 4. Erb:YAG (A = 2.94 pm) bone ablation of desicated<br />

bone: etch rate (pm bone ablatedlpulse) versus radiant exposure<br />

(J/cm2). All data points are indicated.<br />

cient of determination (r2), and the correlation<br />

coefficient (r) for the four sets of data points are<br />

summarized in Table 3. Tests of statistical significance<br />

demonstrated a highly statistically significant<br />

difference (P < 0.001) in the slope of the<br />

linear regression curve for each of the lasers except<br />

when comparing the Nd:YAG and the<br />

Ho1:YSGG lasers. However, it was not possible to<br />

test these two lasers over the same range of radiant<br />

exposures, and such a statistical test would<br />

not be valid. It was not possible to accurately determine<br />

an etch rate for the two continuous-wave<br />

lasers.<br />

Optic Fiber Delivery<br />

It was possible to pass the Ho1:YSGG laser<br />

output (A = 2.10 pm) down a silica optic fiber (300<br />

pm core diameter, 60 cm length) with sufficient<br />

delivered pulse energy (800 mJ) to easily ablate<br />

bone. However, the Erb:YAG laser (A = 2.94 pm)<br />

was extremely attenuated, such that only 45 mJ<br />

could be transmitted through a 18 cm length of<br />

silica optic fiber. This was insufficient to ablate<br />

bone.<br />

Histology<br />

Histologic sections of ablated bone were examined<br />

with light microscopy. <strong>Bone</strong> specimens<br />

ablated by a range of radiant exposures for the<br />

three pulsed lasers and by a range of irradiances<br />

for the two continuous-wave lasers were studied.<br />

Zones of tissue damage were identified by an alteration<br />

in the tissue staining characteristics. This<br />

generally was an increased basophilic staining<br />

character in the tissue region adjacent to the ablation<br />

edge. Lesions produced by the pulsed Nd:YAG<br />

and the Erb:YAG lasers had smooth edges and a<br />

10 to 15 pm zone of tissue damage over the whole<br />

range of radiant exposures studied (Figs. 5, 7).<br />

There was no increase in the zone of tissue damage<br />

as the radiant exposure was increased for the<br />

Nd:YAG and the Erb:YAG lasers. Lesions produced<br />

by the Ho1:YSGG laser had a histologic<br />

TABLE 2. Summary of the Range of Thickness of Calvaria and the Average Number of<br />

Pulses Required to Perforate the Calvaria at the Various Radiant Exposures Used With<br />

the Three Pulsed <strong>Laser</strong>s<br />

<strong>Laser</strong><br />

Range of calvaria<br />

thicknesses (um)<br />

Nd:YAG 380-710<br />

Ho1:YSGG 410-1,070<br />

Erb:YAG 810-1,320<br />

(wet bone)<br />

Erb:YAG 330-640<br />

(dry bone)<br />

Radiant<br />

exposure (J/cm2)<br />

8<br />

11<br />

17<br />

23<br />

27<br />

18<br />

27<br />

33<br />

44<br />

78<br />

135<br />

8<br />

15<br />

23<br />

46<br />

102<br />

9<br />

10<br />

16<br />

20<br />

22<br />

31<br />

42<br />

Average no. of pulses<br />

required for perforation<br />

145<br />

93<br />

64<br />

29<br />

53<br />

57<br />

34<br />

36<br />

25<br />

11<br />

11<br />

161<br />

24<br />

14<br />

8<br />

3<br />

18<br />

10<br />

7.6<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

A


TABLE 3. Pulsed <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> Data<br />

<strong>Infrared</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> 385<br />

Slope of linear Range of radiant Coefficient of Correlation<br />

regression curve' exposures (J/cm2) determination (r2) coefficient (r)<br />

Nd:YAG 0.74 8-22.5 0.43 0.66<br />

Ho1:YSGG 0.67 18-135 0.92 0.96.<br />

Erb:YAG (moist bone) 2.70 8-102 0.90 0.95<br />

Erb:YAG (dry bone) 1.77 9-42 0.82 0.90<br />

'Micron of bone ablated per pulse per J/cm2.<br />

appearance that varied with the radiant exposure:<br />

at a radiant exposure of 18 Jlcm2, the ablated<br />

lesion had smooth edges and a 20 pm zone of tissue<br />

damage, while at a radiant exposure of 135 J/cm2,<br />

the lesion edge had a more fibrillar appearance<br />

and a wider 90 pm zone of tissue damage. Radiant<br />

exposures between these two extremes resulted in<br />

an intermediate amount of tissue damage (Fig. 6).<br />

There was a moderate degree of correlation between<br />

radiant exposure and the extent of tissue<br />

damage for this laser (r = 0.70).<br />

Lesions produced by the two continuous-wave<br />

lasers had jagged edges with a fibrillar appearance<br />

and had a 60 to 135 pm zone of tissue damage<br />

(Figs. 8, 9). In the case of the continuous-wave<br />

lasers, there was also a narrow zone (5 to 10 pm)<br />

of decreased stain uptake immediately adjacent to<br />

the lesion edge. There was no significant correlation<br />

between irradiance and the size of the area of<br />

tissue damage for the continuous-wave lasers.<br />

There also was no significant correlation between<br />

total delivered energy and the area of tissue<br />

damage.<br />

<strong>Infrared</strong> Spectrophotometry<br />

The absorbance characteristics of a dehydrated<br />

nondecalcified 20 pm-thick piece of compact<br />

bone in the infrared wavelengths from X =<br />

1.0 through 3.2 pm are presented in Figure 10.<br />

Absorbance is defined as follows: A = loglo IoA,<br />

where 10 is the intensity of incident laser light<br />

and 10 is the intensity of transmitted light. Of<br />

special note is the greater than 4 log-scale increase<br />

in infrared absorbance as the wavelength<br />

increases from 2.7 to 2.8 pm.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

It is useful to consider the composition and<br />

structure of bone prior to discussing possible<br />

mechanisms of bone ablation. <strong>Bone</strong> is a biologic<br />

material with an inherent nonhomogeneity and<br />

Fig. 5. Photomicrograph of pulsed Nd:YAG (A = 1.064 pm) lesion edge and narrow (10 to 15 pm) zone of altered staining<br />

bone ablation. Radiant exposure = 16.5 J/cm2, 10 nsec pulse characteristics. Original magnification x4.<br />

width, 130 pulses delivered at 1 pulse per sec. Note smooth


386 <strong>Nuss</strong> et al<br />

Fig. 6. Photomicrograph of HoI:YSGG (A = 2.10 pm) bone ance of lesion edge and wide (60 to 90 pm) zone of altered<br />

ablation. Radiant exposure = 44 J/crn2, 250 psec pulse width, staining characteristics. Original magnification x4.<br />

25 pulses delivered at 2 pulses per sec. Note rough appear-<br />

Fig. 7. Photomicrograph of Erb:YAG (A = 2.94 pm) bone ablation.<br />

Radiant exposure = 46 J/cm2, 250 psec pulse width, 8<br />

pulses delivered at 2 pulses per sec. Note smooth lesion edge<br />

and narrow (10 to 15 pm) zone of altered staining characteristics.<br />

Original magnification X4.


<strong>Infrared</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> 387<br />

Fig. 8. Photomicrograph of CW-Nd:YAG (A = 1.064 pm) bone<br />

ablation. Irradiance = 2,700 Wkm2,lOO msec pulse duration,<br />

5 pulses delivered at 1 pulse per sec. Note jagged, fibrillar<br />

appearance of lesion edge and wide (60 to 135 pm) zone of<br />

altered staining characteristcs. Original magnification x2.<br />

Fig. 9. Photomicrograph of CW-COP (A = 10.6 pm) bone abla- appearance of lesion edge and wide (60 to 135 pm) zone of<br />

tion. Irradiance = 880 Wkm2, 50 msec pulse duration, 5 altered staining characteristics. Original magnification X2.<br />

pulses delivered at 1 pulse per sec. Note jagged, fibrillar<br />

consists of compact (substantia compacta) and them is a layer of substantia spongiosa of varying<br />

spongy (substantia spongiosa) forms. In the flat thickness that is occupied by bone marrow.<br />

bones of the skull, the substantia compacta forms The interstitial substance of bone is comthick<br />

layers on each surface, which are referred to posed of two major components, an organic matrix<br />

as the inner and outer tables of the skull. Between and inorganic salts, each comprising about 50% of


388 Nus et al<br />

its dry weight [El. The organic matrix of bone in<br />

adult mammals consists of about 95% collagen<br />

(predominantly type I), which lies in a highly ordered<br />

arrangement. The collagenous fibers are<br />

embedded in a ground substance consisting of glycosaminoglycans<br />

(chondroitin sulfate, keratin sulfate,<br />

and hyaluronic acid) [15]. The inorganic<br />

portion of bone consists of submicroscopic deposits<br />

of a form of calcium phosphate that is very similar<br />

to the mineral hydroxyapatite (Calo[P04]6[OH],).<br />

Also present are significant amounts of the citrate<br />

ion C6H507-3 and the carbonate ion C03-3 [15].<br />

Water molecules are closely associated with the<br />

organic matrix and the inorganic salts of bone.<br />

Each of these components has its characteristic<br />

absorption qualities in the infrared region of<br />

the electromagnetic spectrum. H20 has its strongest<br />

absorption peak at A = 2.7 to 3.2 pm (absorption<br />

coefficient a = 7700cm-l) [16]. The<br />

absorption coefficient (a) is equal to 2.3/L, where<br />

L is the extinction length of the material being<br />

analyzed. For the wavelengths of interest in this<br />

study, the absorption coefficient of H20 at A =<br />

1.064 pm, 2.10 pm, 2.94 pm, and 10.6 pm is a =<br />

0.4 cm-l, 40 cm-',7700 cm-', and 600 cm-', respectively<br />

[ 161.<br />

Vertebrate collagen has four major absorption<br />

bands in the infrared spectrum. These occur<br />

at wavelengths of 3.03 pm, 6.06 pm, 6.54 pm, and<br />

8.06 pm [ 17,181. The mineral, hydroxyapatite, absorbs<br />

most strongly in the infrared spectrum at<br />

wavelengths of 2.94 pm and 9.26 pm [19]. In addition,<br />

calcium phosphate has strong infrared absorption<br />

bands at wavelengths of 3.1 pm, 3.3 pm,<br />

9.2 pm, and 9.7 pm[20].<br />

In general, there are three possible mechanisms<br />

of infrared laser bone ablation and tissue<br />

damage. These include 1) absorption of infrared<br />

laser energy by H20 molecules associated with the<br />

organic and inorganic components of the bone (implying<br />

a thermal bone ablation mechanism), 2)<br />

absorption of the laser energy by the organic collagen<br />

matrix and/or the inorganic calcium salts of<br />

the bone (also a thermal mechanism), and 3) an<br />

optical breakdown and plasma cutting phenomenon<br />

producing bone ablation at sufficiently high<br />

laser irradiance. The absorption characteristics of<br />

the laser wavelengths by the components of the<br />

bone, the pulse duration, and the radiant exposure<br />

or irradiance are relevant considerations in proposing<br />

a mechanism of laser bone ablation.<br />

At wavelengths where bone has a large absorption<br />

coefficient (a) and shallow penetration<br />

Abiorbance<br />

A = 109 lo<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

I<br />

. . . . . . . . . . . .<br />

10 12 11 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32<br />

Wavelenpth, urn<br />

Fig. 10. Spectrophotometry of nondecalcified 20 pm-thick<br />

piece of ground compact bone. Absorbance plotted in nearinfrared<br />

range from X = 1.0 through 3.2 pm. Note the greater<br />

than 4 log-scale increase in absorbance as the wavelength<br />

increases from X = 2.7 to 2.8 pm.<br />

expected that the laser energy will be absorbed in<br />

a relatively small volume and would ablate bone<br />

more efficiently than a laser wavelength that is<br />

scattered and absorbed over a larger volume. The<br />

absorbance characteristics of a dehydrated nondecalcified<br />

bone (Fig. 10) demonstrates relatively<br />

moderate absorption of 1.064 pm and 2.10 pm<br />

wavelengths. However, bone becomes essentially<br />

impervious to the transmission of infrared light<br />

for wavelengths greater than 2.7 pm. Apart from<br />

the H2O molecules normally associated with the<br />

bone constituents, the organic matrix and the inorganic<br />

calcium salts themselves are strong absorbers<br />

of infrared irradiation from 2.9 pm to 3.3<br />

pm [17-201. Based on this information, it is expected<br />

that a laser operating at a 2.94 pm wavelength<br />

would be more highly absorbed by bone<br />

than one operating at a 2.10 pm wavelength, which<br />

in turn would be absorbed more highly than a<br />

1.064 pm wavelength laser.<br />

When laser energy is sufficiently condensed<br />

in time and space to achieve an extremely high<br />

irradiance, a nonlinear phenomenon known as optical<br />

breakdown will occur. This has been described<br />

extensively with reference to the pulsed<br />

Nd:YAG laser [21,22]. Optical breakdown is accompanied<br />

by a spark and an audible snap. It<br />

depth (inverse of absorption Coefficient, l/d, it is involves the creation of a plasma, which is an


ionized state in which electrons have freely dissociated<br />

from their atoms. Optical breakdown will<br />

occur when an irradiance on the order of lo9 to<br />

10l2 W/cm2 is achieved [21,22]. Only the<br />

Q-switched Nd:YAG laser used in this study produced<br />

sufficiently high irradiance to achieve optical<br />

breakdown. It is important to note the<br />

phenomenon of plasma shielding which occurs<br />

with optical breakdown. Once formed, plasma absorbs<br />

and scatters incident light. This has the effect<br />

of shielding underlying targets in the beam<br />

path [21-231. This may actually result in a decrease<br />

in energy transmission to the target as the<br />

laser irradiance is increased and a corresponding<br />

decrease in target ablation. Just as the creation of<br />

plasma during optical breakdown is a nonlinear<br />

process, the ablation of biologic tissues with a<br />

(f plasma ‘plasma-cutting”) also behaves nonlin-<br />

early [23,24].<br />

Based on the above discussion, a mechanism<br />

of bohe ablation for each of these lasers will be<br />

proposed. The Q-switched Nd:YAG laser had a<br />

threshold radiant exposure for bone ablation of 8.1<br />

J/cm2. The laser and delivery system was limited<br />

to a maximum radiant exposure of 27 J/cm2. This,<br />

however, correlates with an irradiance of 2.7 x<br />

lo9 W/cm2. Each pulse of delivered energy produced<br />

a spark and clear snap, correlating with the<br />

expected optical breakdown. Because there is very<br />

little absorption of this wavelength by bone tissue,<br />

a plasma-cutting process is the most likely mechanism<br />

of ablation. The very narrow zone of thermal<br />

tissue injury around the ablation site (Fig. 5)<br />

makes any thermal component to bone ablation<br />

very unlikely. As seen in Figure 1, there was a<br />

linear increase in etch rate as the radiant exposure<br />

increased from 8.1 to 22.5 J/cm2, which is<br />

then followed by a drop in etch rate at higher<br />

radiant exposures. A plasma shielding effect is the<br />

likely explanation for this observation.<br />

The Ho1:YSGG and Erb:YAG lasers are similar<br />

in all aspects except for their wavelength. They<br />

both are capable of an irradiance on the order of<br />

lo5 W/cm2 and so are clearly not in the range of<br />

optical breakdown and plasma formation. These<br />

lasers are more likely associated with a thermal<br />

mechanism causing vaporization of bone tissue.<br />

The absorption of laser irradiation and conversion<br />

into thermal energy results in a local deposition<br />

of heat. As energy is added and the water in the<br />

tissue is raised to its boiling point, an explosive<br />

vaporization of the tissue will occur [25,26]. It is<br />

interesting to note that both the Ho1:YSGG and<br />

the Erb:YAG lasers produced an audible crack and<br />

<strong>Infrared</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> 389<br />

a yellow-orange flame 1 to 2 cm in length at the<br />

target site for the higher radiant exposures. The<br />

dissipation of pulse energy in a thermal ablation<br />

process occurs not only as the grossly observed fire<br />

and thermalacoustic waves but also in a process<br />

known as spallation. Energy is dissipated in spallation<br />

through the ejection of chunks of target<br />

tissue as part of the explosive vaporization process<br />

~71.<br />

The Ho1:YSGG and the Erb:YAG lasers had<br />

threshold radiant exposures for bone ablation of<br />

18 and 8.0 Jlcm2, respectively. The higher bone<br />

ablation rate observed with the 2.94 pm laser<br />

wavelength correlates with the higher absorbance<br />

of this wavelength by collagen, inorganic salts,<br />

and H2O. Even in a dried bone in which all unbound<br />

water (which may increase infrared laser<br />

energy absorption) has been removed, the<br />

Erb:YAG laser ablates bone more efficiently than<br />

the Ho1:YSGG laser. Because the Erb:YAG laser<br />

is more highly absorbed over a smaller volume of<br />

bone tissue, it is expected that there would be both<br />

more efficient bone ablation as well as less associated<br />

thermal damage than that produced by the<br />

Ho1:YSGG laser (Figs. 6, 7).<br />

These predictions have been supported by<br />

computer modeling [25]. A comparative thermal<br />

modeling of Erb:YAG and Ho1:YAG laser pulses<br />

for tissue vaporization (of a “typical” biologic tissue)<br />

predicts that the Erb:YAG laser will produce<br />

more efficient vaporization with a smaller rim of<br />

thermal damage (12 pm), while the Ho1:YAG laser<br />

will produce a greater margin of thermal damage<br />

(500 pm) because of deeper penetration into the<br />

tissue and because a higher energy is needed to<br />

reach vaporization threshold [25]. In addition, previous<br />

work done with the Erb:YAG laser reported<br />

that the tissue thermal damage zone was confined<br />

to a region of 3 to 5 pm from the edge of the<br />

ablated zone, and that the ablation threshold in<br />

bone was 1.8 J/cm2 [26]. These values are comparable<br />

to those determined in the present study,<br />

though the lower radiant exposure threshold for<br />

bone ablation is likely due to a difference in methodology<br />

for determining ablation threshold.<br />

The two continuous-wave lasers both clearly<br />

ablated bone in a thermal mechanism. Impact of<br />

the laser beam with the bone tissue produced a<br />

whitish glow of the target and subsequent gross<br />

charring surrounding the laser ablation. Histologic<br />

examination confirmed a large lateral spread<br />

of thermal injury (Figs. 8, 9). There was no consistent<br />

threshold irradiance for bone ablation by the<br />

two continuous-wave lasers. There is strong ab-


390 Nus et al<br />

sorption of 10.6 pm laser energy by H2O. The COz<br />

laser was observed to initially vaporize the target<br />

bone tissue, but would frequently cease bone ablation<br />

as the tissue became desicated and a char was<br />

produced. This “stall-out” phenomenon with char<br />

formation has been observed by others [3,8]. It has<br />

been suggested that cooling of the ablation site<br />

with a jet of nitrogen gas may reduce the heat of<br />

lasing and decrease the amount of carbon char<br />

formed [3]. Unlike the C02 laser, there is no component<br />

of bone that is a strong absorber of the<br />

1.064 pm CW-Nd:YAG laser. There was much variability<br />

in this laser’s ability to initiate an ablation<br />

site in the bone, as if a target chromophore<br />

had to be hit before ablation could proceed.<br />

The results of this study suggest several bonecutting<br />

applications for these lasers. Both the<br />

Ho1:YSGG and the Erb:YAG lasers efficiently<br />

ablated bone in a precise and controlled fashion.<br />

Moreover, the Erb:YAG laser produced very minimal<br />

thermal damage to adjacent tissue, while the<br />

Ho1:YSGG laser produced a noticeably greater<br />

amount. However, the 2.10 pm wavelength of the<br />

Ho1:YSGG laser can be efficiently transmitted<br />

through a silica optic fiber with little attenuation<br />

of laser energy, such that it was possible to ablate<br />

bone with this laser using a fiber optic delivery<br />

system. At this time there is no optic fiber that<br />

offers sufficient transmissibility and flexibility to<br />

be useful with the Erb:YAG laser for the purpose<br />

of bone ablation. The development of such a fiber<br />

to carry the 2.94 pm laser wavelength will certainly<br />

increase the versatility and usefulness of<br />

this laser.<br />

Clinical applications for the Ho1:YSGG laser<br />

with a fiber optic delivery system include those<br />

circumstances where precise control of localization<br />

and depth of cut is required. In the field of<br />

otolaryngology, procedures such as endoscopic nasal<br />

sinus surgery and optic canal decompression<br />

may be facilitated by such an instrument. As previously<br />

described, both the Ho1:YSGG and the<br />

Erb:YAG lasers were noted to produce both a flame<br />

and audible crack at higher radiant exposures.<br />

This thermoacoustic shock wave may produce undesirable<br />

effects when ablating bone near delicate<br />

structures.<br />

The continuous-wave lasers will ablate bone,<br />

especially if used in a continuous mode at a high<br />

irradiance, and may be useful in situations where<br />

the gross removal of large amounts of bone is<br />

desired and where there is no concern of thermal<br />

injury and charring to adjacent tissue. Of note is<br />

that the CW-Nd:YAG laser may be delivered by a<br />

fiber optic delivery system. Both the CW-Nd:YAG<br />

and the CW-CO2 lasers are much less precise than<br />

the pulsed lasers and would not be useful when<br />

control of bone ablation depth is of importance.<br />

Future investigation of infrared laser bone<br />

ablation will involve a transmission electron microscopic<br />

examination of the lesions created by<br />

these five lasers. In uivo studies with both the<br />

Ho1:YSGG and the Erb:YAG laser will be useful<br />

to assess other factors such as blood flow through<br />

marrow spaces, which may affect their bone ablation<br />

characteristics. In addition, healing studies<br />

with these two lasers will be important to evaluate<br />

the tissue response to laser ablation.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The bone ablation characteristics of five infrared<br />

lasers, including three pulsed lasers<br />

(Nd:YAG, X = 1.064 pm; Hol:YSGG, X = 2.10 pm;<br />

and Erb:YAG, X = 2.94 pm) and two continuouswave<br />

lasers (Nd:YAG, X = 1.064 pm; and C02, X<br />

= 10.6 pm), were studied. Quantitative etch rates<br />

could be determined for the three pulsed lasers.<br />

The Erb:YAG laser was the most effective bone<br />

ablater, followed by the Ho1:YSGG laser. Histologic<br />

evidence of thermal tissue damage adjacent<br />

to the lesion edge extended 10 to 15 pm for ablations<br />

created by the pulsed Nd:YAG and Erb:YAG<br />

lasers, from 20 to 90 pm for Ho1:YSGG laser ablations,<br />

and from 60 to 135 pm for lesions created by<br />

the two continuous-wave lasers.<br />

The components of bone, including type I collagen<br />

and inorganic calcium salts resembling hydroxyapatite,<br />

have broad spectrophotometric absorption<br />

bands in the range of 2.9 to 3.3 pm. This<br />

correlates well with the observed increase in infrared<br />

absorbance at 2.7 pm of a piece of dehydrated<br />

nondecalcified bone analyzed by spectrophotometry.<br />

In addition, H2O has its strongest<br />

absorption peak in this range.<br />

Observed and theoretical considerations lead<br />

to the following proposed bone ablation mechanisms<br />

for the five infrared lasers. The Q-switched<br />

Nd:YAG laser is operating at sufficiently high irradiance<br />

to ablate bone in a plasma-cutting manner,<br />

with little or no thermal component. The other<br />

four lasers, however, ablate bone by a thermal<br />

mechanism. The Erb:YAG laser delivers a wavelength<br />

that is highly absorbed by bone, and is the<br />

most effective ablater. The Ho1:YSGG laser is not<br />

absorbed by bone as well, and it cuts bone less<br />

effectively and with greater thermal damage. Both<br />

of the continuous-wave lasers create large


amounts of thermal damage to adjacent bone tissue<br />

and cut in a nonlinear and nonpredictable<br />

manner.<br />

The ability of the Ho1:YSGG laser to be<br />

transmitted through a silica optical fiber with sufficient<br />

radiant exposure to ablate bone suggests<br />

applications for this laser in such procedures as<br />

endoscopic nasal sinus surgery and optic canal<br />

decompression procedures. The development of an<br />

optic fiber that is able to efficiently transmit the<br />

Erb:YAG wavelength will increase this laser’s<br />

usefulness. Future investigations will include<br />

transmission electron microscopic studies of the<br />

lesions created by these lasers, as well as in uiuo<br />

and healing studies for the Ho1:YSGG and<br />

Erb:YAG lasers.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

The authors wish to thank Jeff Mani of<br />

Schwartz Electro-Optics, Inc. for his help with bone<br />

ablation experiments.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Clauser C: Comparison of depth and profile of osteotomies<br />

performed by rapid superpulsed and continuouswave<br />

C02 laser beams at high power output. J Oral<br />

Maxillofac Surg 1986; 44:425-430.<br />

2. Biyikli S, Modest MF: Energy requirements for osteotomy<br />

of femora and tibiae with a moving CW COO laser.<br />

<strong>Laser</strong>s Surg Med 1987; 7:512-519.<br />

3. Small IA, Osborn TP, Fuller T, Hussain M, Kobernick S:<br />

Observations of carbon dioxide laser and bone bur in the<br />

osteotomy of the rabbit tibia. J Oral Surg 1979; 37:159-<br />

166.<br />

4. Clayman L, Fuller T, Beckman H: Healing of continuouswave<br />

and rapid superpulsed, carbon dioxide, laser-induced<br />

bone defects. J Oral Surg 1978; 36:932-937.<br />

5. Clauser C, Panzoni E: Comparison between rapid superpulsed<br />

and continuous-wave C02 laser for osteotomies.<br />

In: Atsumi K, Nimsakul K, eds. <strong>Laser</strong> Tokyo ’81. Tokyo:<br />

Japan Inter Group Corp, 1981:4-19.<br />

6. Gertzbein SD, deDemeter D, Cruickshank B, Kapasouri<br />

A: The effect of laser osteotomy on bone healing. <strong>Laser</strong>s<br />

Surg Med 1981; 1:361-373.<br />

7. Horch HH, McCord RC, Keiditsch E: Histological and<br />

long-term results following laser osteotomy. In: Proceedings<br />

of the Second International Surgical <strong>Laser</strong> Symposium,<br />

1977.<br />

8. Coker NJ, Ator GA, Jenkins HA, Neblett CR Carbon<br />

dioxide laser stapedotomy: A histopathologic study. Am<br />

J Otolaryngol 1986; 7:253-257.<br />

<strong>Infrared</strong> <strong>Laser</strong> <strong>Bone</strong> <strong>Ablation</strong> 391<br />

9. Thoma J, cowinski D, Kastenbauer ER Experimental Tissue 1988; 908:l-9.<br />

investigations on the suitability of the carbon dioxide<br />

laser for stapedotomy. Ann Otol Rhino1 Laryngol 1986;<br />

95: 126-131.<br />

10. Gardner G, Robertson JH, Tomoda K, Clark WC: C02<br />

laser stapedotomy: Is it practical? Am J Otolaryngol 1984;<br />

5:108-117.<br />

11. McGee TM: The argon laser in surgery for chronic ear<br />

disease and otosclerosis. Laryngoscope 1983; 93:l 177-<br />

1182.<br />

12. DiBartolomeo JR, Ellis M: The argon laser in otology.<br />

Laryngoscope 1980; 90:1786-1796.<br />

13. Perkins RC: <strong>Laser</strong> stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Laryngoscope<br />

1980; 90:228-241.<br />

14. Wolbarsht ML, Foulks GN, Esterowitz L, %an DC, Levin<br />

K, Storm M: Corneal surgery with an Er:YAG laser at<br />

2.94 pm. In: ARVO Abstracts. Supplement to Invest<br />

Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott, 1986;<br />

93.<br />

15. Fawcett DW: A extbook of Histology. Philadelphia: W.B.<br />

Saunders, 1986:199-208.<br />

16. Bayly JG, Kartha VB, Stevens WH: The absorption spectra<br />

of liquid phase H20, HDO and D20 from 0.7 pm to 10<br />

pm. <strong>Infrared</strong> Physics 1963; 3:211-223.<br />

17. Yannas IV: Collagen and gelatin in the solid state. J<br />

Macromol Sci Rev Macromol Chem 1972; 1:49-104.<br />

18. Doyle BB, Bendit EG, Blout ER <strong>Infrared</strong> spectroscopy of<br />

collagen and collagen-like polypeptides. Biopolymers<br />

1975; 14:937-957.<br />

19. Beaton JD, Charlton TL, Speer R Identification of soilfertilizer<br />

reaction products in a calcareous Saskatchewan<br />

soil by infra-red absorption analysis. Nature 1963;<br />

19~1329-1330.<br />

20. Miller FA, Wilkins CH: <strong>Infrared</strong> spectra and characteristic<br />

frequencies of inorganic ions. Anal Chem 1952;<br />

24:1253-1254.<br />

21. Steinert RF, Puliafito CA: “The Nd-YAG <strong>Laser</strong> in Ophthalmology.”<br />

Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1985:22-35.<br />

22. Mainster MA, Sliney DH, Belcher CD, Buzney SM: <strong>Laser</strong><br />

photodisruptors: Damage mechanisms, instrument design<br />

and safety. Ophthalmology 1983; 90:973-991.<br />

23. Docchio F, Dossi L, Sacchi CA Q-switched Nd:YAG laser<br />

irradiation of the eye and related phenomena: An experimental<br />

study. 11. Shielding properties of laser-induced<br />

plasmas in liquids and membranes. <strong>Laser</strong>s Life Sci 1986;<br />

1: 105-116.<br />

24. Tobin JM: <strong>Laser</strong>-induced plasma ablation of biologic tissue.<br />

Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985 (doctoral<br />

thesis).<br />

25. Sinofsky E: Comparative thermal modeling of Er:YAG,<br />

Ho:YAG and COP laser pulses for tissue vaporization.<br />

SPIE <strong>Laser</strong>s in Medicine 1986; 712:188-192.<br />

26. Bonner RJ?, Smith PD, Leon M, Esterowitz L, Storm M,<br />

Levin K, Tran D: Quantification of tissue effects due to a<br />

pulsed Er:YAG laser at 2.9 pm with beam delivery in a<br />

wet field via zirconium fluoride fibers. SPIE Optical Fibers<br />

in Medicine 1986; 713:2-5.<br />

27. Sartori MP, et al. Chemical laser interactions with human<br />

cardiovascular tissues. SPIE <strong>Laser</strong> Interaction with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!