STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PLAN - Marymount University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Academic Year : 2008/2009 Program: Interior Design Undergraduate Interpretation of Results Extent this Learning Outcome has been achieved by students (Use both direct and indirect measure results): On average, 90% of the student have a rating of three(3) or better. Breaking down the outcome: Floor plan development students ratings were up from 2008/2009 assessment with ratings meeting the 75 threshold; elevations and details student ratings 4 or better crossed below the threshold at 75%, also up from 2008/2009; Finish/Furnish Selections students ratings 4 or better crossed threshold at 82%; RCP development students rating 4 or better crossed below the threshold at 72%; Presentations students ratings 4 or better crossed threshold at 75%;and, Overall project student ratings 4 or better crossed the threshold at 82%. The students in this period of the assessment have met the learning outcome. Program strengths and opportunities for improvement relative to assessment of outcome: Program Strengths are in the area of Verbal and graphic presentation skills in overall presentation of final project and in appropriate selections in furniture and finish selections. Program weaknesses: juror grading and comments in the area ceiling and lighting component application are the areas of weakness. However this assessment skill is up by 4% from the 2008/2009 assessment. This still remains to be skill student tend to leave as the last component to tackle and fail to fully develop – therefore, whether this is a weakness in the program learning outcomes or failure to in student organization skills in 406 is something that needs to be identified. Discuss planned curricular or program improvements for this year based on assessment of outcome: It has been decided by the ID faculty to assess additional studio courses (earlier) to help identify program strengths and weaknesses. The hope is to identify whether these are programmatic issues or anomalies in students going through the program at the time. The courses identified for assessment are sophomore studio course ID 201 and junior studio course ID 304. ID 304 will assess construction documents and RCP’s will be a component of this to identify their understanding of ceiling and lighting components. Means of assessing these earlier skills will be set in motion for the next assessment period -- along with looking at outcomes for the program review being implemented for CIDA Accreditation in spring 2011. 10
Academic Year : 2008/2009 Program: Interior Design Undergraduate Learning Outcome 4. Students will exhibit the ability to read, interpret, and create contract documents Is this outcome being reexamined? Yes No If yes, give a brief summary of previous results (including trends) and any changes made to the program. Assessment Activity Outcome Measures Explain how student learning will be measured and indicate whether it is direct or indirect. NOT ASSESSED AT THIS TIME Performance Standard Define and explain acceptable level of student performance. Data Collection Discuss the data collected and student population Analysis 1) Describe the analysis process. 2) Present the findings of the analysis including the numbers participating and deemed acceptable. Outcome and Past Assessment 11
Page 1 and 2: Academic Year : 2008/2009 Program:
Page 9: Academic Year : 2008/2009 Program:
Page 13: Academic Year : 2008/2009 Program:

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PLAN - Marymount University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?