28.08.2014 Views

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PLAN - Marymount University

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PLAN - Marymount University

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT PLAN - Marymount University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Academic Year : 2008/2009 Program: Interior Design Undergraduate<br />

Learning outcome 4: There are currently no set up for assessment for this outcome in place. The academic year 2009/2010<br />

evaluation tools are being put into to place to assess this outcome.<br />

Learning outcome 5: Internship Employer Evaluations. Interior design students complete internships for a total of 6 credit hours.<br />

Employer evaluations meet the needs of interior standards for interior design minimum proficiency as defined by both NCIDQ<br />

(National Council for Interior Design Qualification) and CIDA (Council for Interior Design Accreditation) practice analysis assessment<br />

and have been created as an assessment tool for student’s application of knowledge and skills in workplace environment. MU interior<br />

design student’s internships are conducted at commercial firms, architectural firms, residential firms, retail firms and showrooms.<br />

(See Attachment : ID 400 Employer Evaluation)<br />

The employer evaluations only give a small “snap shot” of what the students are learning in the area of contract administration and<br />

business practice. A more thorough assessment of this learning outcome would to be to concentrate on the course ID 436: Business<br />

Practice and define some assessment tools to evaluate further these learning outcomes. Fall 2010, the mid-term and final exam will<br />

also be used as assessment tool for this learning outcome and additional learning outcomes identified in program review for CIDA<br />

accreditation..<br />

Learning Outcome 1: Students will capably use quantitative and qualitative skills to evaluate and assess project goals and<br />

objectives.<br />

Programmatic inquiry is the heart of design problem – thus, the programs main “inquiry outcome”. Programming is two pronged –<br />

discovery of information both qualitative and quantitative that is tested in the following stages: qualitative in the schematic stage and<br />

quantitative in the design development stage.<br />

This “inquiry outcome” in the future assessment 2011/2012 will be assessed in the following courses:<br />

ID 201: Studio I. Students are first introduced to the foundations of the design phases to evaluating design environments,<br />

human factors, end user needs and beginning ADA, universal and building, life safety codes.<br />

ID 303: Studio 4. Students deal with a larger, more complex project in this studio classroom. Incorporated are more variables<br />

of end users within the space and components of human factors where ADA , universal, and building, life safety codes.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!