04.09.2014 Views

Petitioners' Brief on the Merits - Supreme Court of Texas

Petitioners' Brief on the Merits - Supreme Court of Texas

Petitioners' Brief on the Merits - Supreme Court of Texas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE<br />

Nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case:<br />

Trial <strong>Court</strong>:<br />

Trial <strong>Court</strong>’s Dispositi<strong>on</strong>:<br />

This is a pers<strong>on</strong>al injury lawsuit against<br />

Building Materials Corporati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> America.<br />

The H<strong>on</strong>orable Karen Gren Johns<strong>on</strong>, 95 th<br />

Judicial District <strong>Court</strong>, Dallas County<br />

Summary judgment granted based <strong>on</strong> judicial<br />

estoppel.<br />

Parties in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals: Jas<strong>on</strong> and Bobbie Fergus<strong>on</strong>, Appellants;<br />

Building Materials Corporati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> America,<br />

CPC Logistics, Inc. and Robert James Maddox,<br />

Appellees.<br />

<strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals:<br />

<strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals’ Dispositi<strong>on</strong>:<br />

Eighth <strong>Court</strong> <strong>of</strong> Appeals; Justice McClure,<br />

joined by Justice Carr, Chief Justice Chew<br />

dissenting. Fergus<strong>on</strong> v. Building Materials<br />

Corp. <strong>of</strong> Am., No. 08-07-00051-CV, 2008 WL<br />

2390328 (Tex. App.—El Paso, June 12, 2008,<br />

pet. filed) (Opini<strong>on</strong> attached, Appendix, Tab 2).<br />

Affirmed<br />

STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION<br />

The <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> has jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> over this case under Government Code<br />

secti<strong>on</strong> 22.001(a)(1) because <strong>the</strong> justices in <strong>the</strong> court <strong>of</strong> appeals disagree <strong>on</strong> a<br />

questi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> law material to <strong>the</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>. The <strong>Supreme</strong> <strong>Court</strong> also has jurisdicti<strong>on</strong><br />

over this case under Government Code secti<strong>on</strong> 22.001(a)(6) because <strong>the</strong> court <strong>of</strong><br />

appeals committed an error <strong>of</strong> law <strong>of</strong> such importance to <strong>the</strong> State’s jurisprudence<br />

that it should be corrected.<br />

PETITIONERS’ BRIEF ON THE MERITS 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!