Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Order issued January 19,2012 III The Ql:uurt nf Appealu llI'iftl! IDiutrid nf We:mu lit IDallnu No.05-1I-01J03-CV ROBERT L. AND JULIA T. MCCULLOUGH, Appellants V. SCARBROUGH, MEDLIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL., Appellees ORDER llefore the <strong>Court</strong> is appellants' January 4,2012 emergency motion f
Order issued Febrwu'y 7 , 2012 lJiiftl~ In The ([ourt llf Appealz IDirdrid oJ Wcxas nt IDnllns -- -.------------------ No.05-11-0J303-CV ROBERT L. AND JULIA T. MCCULLOUGH, Appellants V. SCARBROUGH, MEDLIN AND ASSOCIATI~S, INC., ET AL., Appellees ORDER Berorc the <strong>Court</strong> is appellants' February 6,2012 second emergency moiton to stay order on supersedeas bond and final judgment. We DENY the motion.
Page 1 and 2: NO. 12-0454 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
Page 3 and 4: SMA contested the McCullough’s cl
Page 5 and 6: III. ARGUMENT & AUTHORITIES The McC
Page 7 and 8: and, as a result, the judgment is n
Page 9 and 10: On June 6, 2012, the McCulloughs fi
Page 11 and 12: including the testimony of Robert M
Page 13 and 14: effectively supersede the judgment
Page 15 and 16: NO. 12-0454 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF
Page 17: SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me o
Page 21 and 22: Thompson, Dishict Clerk of Collin C
Page 23 and 24: 2. On August 25, 2011, Plaintiffs f
Page 25 and 26: the circumstances existing at the t
Page 27 and 28: "'all" McCulIoughs have additional
Page 29 and 30: $90,000.00 of their assets to third
Page 31 and 32: No. 05-11-01303-CV IN THE COURT OF
Page 33 and 34: amounts for future income taxes, $3
Page 35 and 36: S.W.2d 629, 635 (Tex. 1986) (citing
Page 37 and 38: (i) Anderton compels exclusion of t
Page 39 and 40: has not done so. 19 And, the McCull
Page 41 and 42: have been counted as a liability fo
Page 43 and 44: liability is “reasonably possible
Page 45 and 46: While Melton’s testimony provides
Page 47 and 48: unknown. 61 Shilling did not tell S
Page 49 and 50: Other than some additional depositi
Page 51 and 52: McCulloughs are appealing the entir
Page 53 and 54: the misappropriated funds. 80 Stewa
Page 55 and 56: Once the contest is resolved and th
Page 57 and 58: overwhelming weight of the evidence
Page 59 and 60: testimony. 97 The trial court also
Page 61 and 62: Second, the McCulloughs argue that
Page 63 and 64: judgment debtor. It is only substan
Page 65 and 66: asset to pay litigation costs, they
Page 67 and 68: personal effects and jewelry, more
Page 69 and 70:
McCulloughs to post an additional $
Page 71 and 72:
CAUSE NO. 416-02008-2009 SCARBROUGH
Page 73 and 74:
---_.......----..............- __ _
Page 75 and 76:
However, Stewart and Robert McCullo
Page 77 and 78:
6/10/11 -7/8/11 7/9/11-8/10/11 8/11
Page 79 and 80:
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defend
Page 81 and 82:
326 S.W.3d 725, *; 2010 Tex. App. L
Page 83 and 84:
MR. AND MRS. ROBERT MCCULLOUGH FINA
Page 85 and 86:
ACCOUNTANTS' COMPILATION REPORT Mr.
Page 87 and 88:
NOTE A - BASIS OF ACCOUNTING MR.AND
Page 89 and 90:
Docket Sheet for: 05-11-01303-CV of
Page 91 and 92:
Docket Sheet for: 05-11-01303-CV of
Page 93 and 94:
Search http://apps.collincountytx.g
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
show all

Filed - Supreme Court of Texas

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?