04.09.2014 Views

The Supreme Court of Ohio annual report - Supreme Court - State of ...

The Supreme Court of Ohio annual report - Supreme Court - State of ...

The Supreme Court of Ohio annual report - Supreme Court - State of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

William H. Harsha, J., <strong>of</strong> the 4 th<br />

Appellate District, was assigned to sit for<br />

Resnick, J., whose term ended on Jan. 1,<br />

2007.<br />

Am. Interstate Ins. Co. v. G & H Serv. Ctr.*<br />

Case no. 2006-0051<br />

Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-608.<br />

Subrogation claims arising from workers’<br />

compensation payments are governed by the<br />

laws <strong>of</strong> the state in which compensation was<br />

paid. (Restatement <strong>of</strong> the Law 2d, Conflict<br />

<strong>of</strong> Laws [1971], Section 185, applied.)<br />

Shelby App. No. 17-05-08, 165 <strong>Ohio</strong> App.3d<br />

104, 2005-<strong>Ohio</strong>-5753. Judgment affirmed.<br />

Moyer, C.J., Grendell, Pfeifer, Lundberg<br />

Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and<br />

Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />

Diane V. Grendell, J., <strong>of</strong> the 11 th<br />

Appellate District, was assigned to sit for<br />

Resnick, J., whose term ended on Jan.1,<br />

2007.<br />

MARCH<br />

<strong>State</strong> v. Evans *<br />

Case no. 2005-1692<br />

Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-861<br />

(1). An appellate court may not vacate and<br />

remand an entire sentence imposed upon<br />

a defendant when the error in sentencing<br />

pertains only to a sanction imposed for<br />

one specification. (2). App.R. 12(A)(1)(c)<br />

requires an appellate court to decide each<br />

assignment <strong>of</strong> error and give written reasons<br />

for its decision unless the assignment <strong>of</strong><br />

error is made moot by a ruling on another<br />

assignment <strong>of</strong> error.<br />

Cuyahoga App. No. 85396, 2005-<strong>Ohio</strong>-3847.<br />

Cause remanded to the court <strong>of</strong> appeals for<br />

further consideration.<br />

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton,<br />

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.<br />

Donovan and Lanzinger, JJ., concur<br />

separately.<br />

Pfeifer, J., dissents.<br />

Mary E. Donovan, J., <strong>of</strong> the 2 nd Appellate<br />

District, was assigned to sit for Resnick,<br />

J., whose term ended on Jan. 1, 2007.<br />

<strong>State</strong> ex rel. Beane v. Dayton<br />

Case no. 2006-1929<br />

Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-811<br />

Dismissed a mandamus action by a Dayton<br />

police <strong>of</strong>ficer who sought to compel the city<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dayton to comply with a recently enacted<br />

state law.<br />

In Mandamus. Cause dismissed. Opinion<br />

issued per curiam.<br />

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton,<br />

O’Connor, O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ.,<br />

concur.<br />

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., concur in<br />

judgment only.<br />

Girl Scouts-Great Trail Council v. Levin*<br />

Case no. 2006-0266.<br />

Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-972<br />

Affirms a Board <strong>of</strong> Tax Appeals holding that<br />

the Girl Scouts-Great Trail Council used<br />

its Stark County property for charitable<br />

purposes and, therefore, was entitled<br />

to exemption from real estate tax in<br />

accordance with R.C. 5709.12(B). Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> Tax Appeals, No. 2004-R-166. Decision<br />

affirmed.<br />

Grendell, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton,<br />

O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ.,<br />

concur.<br />

Moyer, C.J., dissents.<br />

Diane V. Grendell, J., <strong>of</strong> the 11 th<br />

Appellate District, was assigned to sit for<br />

Resnick, J., whose term ended on Jan. 1,<br />

2007.<br />

Fehrenbach v. O’Malley*<br />

Case nos. 2005-2283 and 2005-2301<br />

Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-971<br />

Because a parent’s claim for loss <strong>of</strong><br />

consortium against a third party for injuries<br />

to the parent’s minor child is an interest that<br />

is “joint and inseparable” from the child’s<br />

own claim, the parent’s claim may be tolled<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!