The Supreme Court of Ohio annual report - Supreme Court - State of ...
The Supreme Court of Ohio annual report - Supreme Court - State of ...
The Supreme Court of Ohio annual report - Supreme Court - State of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
William H. Harsha, J., <strong>of</strong> the 4 th<br />
Appellate District, was assigned to sit for<br />
Resnick, J., whose term ended on Jan. 1,<br />
2007.<br />
Am. Interstate Ins. Co. v. G & H Serv. Ctr.*<br />
Case no. 2006-0051<br />
Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-608.<br />
Subrogation claims arising from workers’<br />
compensation payments are governed by the<br />
laws <strong>of</strong> the state in which compensation was<br />
paid. (Restatement <strong>of</strong> the Law 2d, Conflict<br />
<strong>of</strong> Laws [1971], Section 185, applied.)<br />
Shelby App. No. 17-05-08, 165 <strong>Ohio</strong> App.3d<br />
104, 2005-<strong>Ohio</strong>-5753. Judgment affirmed.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Grendell, Pfeifer, Lundberg<br />
Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and<br />
Lanzinger, JJ., concur.<br />
Diane V. Grendell, J., <strong>of</strong> the 11 th<br />
Appellate District, was assigned to sit for<br />
Resnick, J., whose term ended on Jan.1,<br />
2007.<br />
MARCH<br />
<strong>State</strong> v. Evans *<br />
Case no. 2005-1692<br />
Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-861<br />
(1). An appellate court may not vacate and<br />
remand an entire sentence imposed upon<br />
a defendant when the error in sentencing<br />
pertains only to a sanction imposed for<br />
one specification. (2). App.R. 12(A)(1)(c)<br />
requires an appellate court to decide each<br />
assignment <strong>of</strong> error and give written reasons<br />
for its decision unless the assignment <strong>of</strong><br />
error is made moot by a ruling on another<br />
assignment <strong>of</strong> error.<br />
Cuyahoga App. No. 85396, 2005-<strong>Ohio</strong>-3847.<br />
Cause remanded to the court <strong>of</strong> appeals for<br />
further consideration.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton,<br />
O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.<br />
Donovan and Lanzinger, JJ., concur<br />
separately.<br />
Pfeifer, J., dissents.<br />
Mary E. Donovan, J., <strong>of</strong> the 2 nd Appellate<br />
District, was assigned to sit for Resnick,<br />
J., whose term ended on Jan. 1, 2007.<br />
<strong>State</strong> ex rel. Beane v. Dayton<br />
Case no. 2006-1929<br />
Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-811<br />
Dismissed a mandamus action by a Dayton<br />
police <strong>of</strong>ficer who sought to compel the city<br />
<strong>of</strong> Dayton to comply with a recently enacted<br />
state law.<br />
In Mandamus. Cause dismissed. Opinion<br />
issued per curiam.<br />
Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton,<br />
O’Connor, O’Donnell and Cupp, JJ.,<br />
concur.<br />
Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., concur in<br />
judgment only.<br />
Girl Scouts-Great Trail Council v. Levin*<br />
Case no. 2006-0266.<br />
Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-972<br />
Affirms a Board <strong>of</strong> Tax Appeals holding that<br />
the Girl Scouts-Great Trail Council used<br />
its Stark County property for charitable<br />
purposes and, therefore, was entitled<br />
to exemption from real estate tax in<br />
accordance with R.C. 5709.12(B). Board<br />
<strong>of</strong> Tax Appeals, No. 2004-R-166. Decision<br />
affirmed.<br />
Grendell, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton,<br />
O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ.,<br />
concur.<br />
Moyer, C.J., dissents.<br />
Diane V. Grendell, J., <strong>of</strong> the 11 th<br />
Appellate District, was assigned to sit for<br />
Resnick, J., whose term ended on Jan. 1,<br />
2007.<br />
Fehrenbach v. O’Malley*<br />
Case nos. 2005-2283 and 2005-2301<br />
Web cite 2007-<strong>Ohio</strong>-971<br />
Because a parent’s claim for loss <strong>of</strong><br />
consortium against a third party for injuries<br />
to the parent’s minor child is an interest that<br />
is “joint and inseparable” from the child’s<br />
own claim, the parent’s claim may be tolled<br />
90