o_19160673rcq1190b12mm8mi1nd9a.pdf

"We have to accept the fact that man has become disgruntled at being constantly repressed,
but we must do everything we can to at least temper the sinful desires of man, lest they run
rampant in this new age," say the religionists of the right-hand path to the questioning
Satanist. "Why continue to think of these desires as shameful and something to be repressed,
if you now admit they are natural?" returns the Satanist. Could it be that the white-light
religionists are a bit "sour-grapes" about the fact that they didn't think of a religion, before the
Satanists, which would be enjoyable to follow; and if the truth were known, would they too
not like to have a bit more pleasure out of life, but for fear of losing face, cannot admit it?
Could it also be that they are afraid people will, after hearing about Satanism, tell themselves
"This is for me - why should I continue with a religion which condemns me for everything I
do, even though there is nothing actually wrong with it?" The Satanist thinks this is more than
likely true.
There is certainly much evidence that past religions are, every day, lifting more and more of
their ridiculous restrictions. Even so, when an entire religion is based on abstinence instead of
indulgence (as it should be) there is little left when it has been revised to meet the current
needs of man. So, why waste time "buying oats for a dead horse"?
The watchword of Satanism is INDULGENCE instead of "abstinence" . . . BUT - it is not
“compulsion“.