07.09.2014 Views

Bentrup, Gary - Soil and Water Conservation Society

Bentrup, Gary - Soil and Water Conservation Society

Bentrup, Gary - Soil and Water Conservation Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Missing the Bull’s Eye With<br />

Targeting?<br />

Source: Flexibledogma.com


Purpose of Targeting<br />

• Effective use of limited resources<br />

to focus preservation, conservation<br />

<strong>and</strong> other management alternatives<br />

to improve environmental quality<br />

Biophysical Foundation


Moving Data into Action<br />

ACCEPTANCE<br />

ADOPTION<br />

CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY


Challenges


Challenges<br />

Urban/suburban l<strong>and</strong>s contribute<br />

more nitrogen (30 lb/ac/yr) than<br />

agricultural l<strong>and</strong>s (17 lb/ac/yr).<br />

Chesapeake Bay Foundation


Principles for Targeting Tools<br />

1. What, Where, How<br />

2. Biophysical, Economic, <strong>and</strong> Social<br />

3. User Participation<br />

4. Multiple Scales <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> Uses<br />

5. Loosely Coupled


1.What, Where, How<br />

Targeting Tools<br />

versus<br />

Research Tools


Research Tools<br />

Why?<br />

Source: www.icsu-scope.org/


Targeting Tools<br />

What, Where, <strong>and</strong> How?


2. Biophysical, Economic, Social


2. Biophysical, Economic, Social


2. Biophysical, Economic, Social


2. Biophysical, Economic, Social


3. User Participation


Tool Adoption Factors<br />

• Based on familiar data, procedures<br />

equations, etc.<br />

• Readily available data<br />

• Avoid the “black box”<br />

• Decision-support not decision-making


4. Multiple Scales-L<strong>and</strong> Uses<br />

Economic stability<br />

Stable banks<br />

<strong>Water</strong> quality<br />

Site<br />

Community<br />

<strong>Water</strong>shed<br />

Wildlife population<br />

Region


Surface Runoff Sediment<br />

Trapping Efficiency<br />

Percent Trapping Efficiency<br />

0-25.00<br />

0 125 250 500<br />

Kilometers<br />

25.01-50.00<br />

50.01-75.00<br />

75.01-100


Surface Runoff Sediment<br />

Trapping Efficiency<br />

Percent Trapping Efficiency<br />

75.01-100<br />

50.01-75.00<br />

25.01 - 50.00<br />

0-25.00<br />

<strong>Water</strong> Bodies<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s Not Meeting Criteria<br />

0 50 100 200 Kilomet ers


Surface Runoff Sediment<br />

Trapping Efficiency<br />

Percent Trapping Efficiency<br />

75.01 - 100.00<br />

50.01 - 75.00<br />

25.01 - 50.00<br />

0 - 25.00<br />

<strong>Soil</strong>s not meeting criteria<br />

<strong>Water</strong> Bodies<br />

0 0. 5 1 2<br />

Kilometers


4. Multiple Scales-L<strong>and</strong> Uses<br />

Over 70% of the l<strong>and</strong> area<br />

is in agricultural production


5. Loosely Coupled<br />

Planning as a linear process<br />

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.


5. Loosely Coupled<br />

Planning as an iterative process<br />

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.


<strong>Conservation</strong> Buffer<br />

Planning Project


Soldier Creek<br />

<strong>Water</strong>shed<br />

Grassl<strong>and</strong>s/Herbaceous<br />

Pasture/Hay<br />

Row Crops<br />

Small Grain<br />

Fal low<br />

Low Intensity Residential<br />

High Intensity Residential<br />

Commercial/Industrial/Tran<br />

Deciduous Forest<br />

TOPEKA


Sediment Trapping<br />

Efficiency<br />

Percent Trapping Efficiency<br />

0 - 2 5 H<br />

2 5 -5 0 M H<br />

5 0 -7 5 M L<br />

7 5 -1 00 L<br />

N o t F a rm a b le<br />

W a te r<br />

5 0<br />

10<br />

miles


Decorative Willow Market Values<br />

Net Value - 1,000’<br />

Scarlet Curls Willow $3580<br />

Streamco Willow $1580<br />

French Pussy Willow $ 450<br />

Curly Willow $ 430<br />

(4-5’ foot plant spacing)


Decorative Willows<br />

Decorative Willow Suitability<br />

Highly Favor able<br />

Favorable<br />

5 0<br />

10<br />

miles


Wildlife Habitat & Movement<br />

Riparian Connectivity


Riparian Connectivity<br />

Rodger Barbour<br />

Mont St-Hilaire Nature Center<br />

#@%&*$@!!<br />

0.18 km<br />

Greg Sievert<br />

• 0.1 ha patches<br />

• Disperses 0.16 km<br />

<strong>Bentrup</strong> <strong>and</strong> Kellerman 2004


Riparian<br />

Connectivity<br />

Riparian Connectivity<br />

Ri parian Are as<br />

Co nn ectivity Zones<br />

Cr itical Gaps<br />

5 0<br />

10<br />

miles


Multiple<br />

Objectives<br />

Locations where plantings can:<br />

1. Protect <strong>and</strong> improve water quality<br />

2. Provide an alternative ag. product<br />

3. Restore riparian corridors for wildlife<br />

5 0<br />

10<br />

miles


Planning <strong>and</strong> Design Principles


<strong>Water</strong> Quality


Species & Habitat


Economic Opportunities


Visual Simulations


Benefits of 2-D Simulations<br />

• Promote better underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

• Increase involvement in planning<br />

• Create shared vision<br />

• Increase ownership<br />

• Increase adoption


Visual Simulation Starter Kit


Suite of Tools


Object Libraries


Visual Simulations


Assembling the Pieces<br />

Biological<br />

Considerations<br />

Social<br />

Considerations<br />

Questions?<br />

Economic<br />

Considerations<br />

Physical<br />

Considerations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!