Corporate responsibility report 2004 - Tata Steel

Environment
Managing Case studycorporate responsibility
ULCOS – Ultra low CO 2
steelmaking
ULCOS is a €44m (£29m), part EC
funded, multi-partner research &
development initiative to investigate
new steel production processes
that would drastically reduce
CO 2 and other greenhouse gas
emissions compared to current
production methods.
The ULCOS consortium comprises
48 European companies and
organisations led by a core group
of steel producers including Corus.
The consortium is further composed
of suppliers to the steel industry,
research institutes, small/medium
sized businesses and universities.
Breakthrough concepts for making
steel that have the potential of
reducing specific CO 2 emissions by
30 to 70% will be investigated. These
include technology based on recycling
blast furnace gas after removal of CO 2
(including CO 2 capture and storage
technologies), electrolysis, use of
hydrogen, and utilisation of biomass.
The initiative will start with a five year
exploratory phase, followed by a five
year pilot phase and then, depending
on the outcome of the development
work and technical/economic viability,
commercial implementation.
Case study
Internet-based supplier
assessment
In order to assess the environmental
credentials of our suppliers and
contractors and to help ‘green’ our
supply chain, we have developed an
internet-based supplier assessment
system. This paperless electronic
system automatically scores the
answers given to a series of questions
on items such as policy, management
systems, performance, training,
awareness, accountability and
auditing. Scores are then weighted to
ensure that issues such as persistent
non-compliance are recognised and
are given due consideration.
The completed questionnaire with its
automatic score is then assessed in
more detail. At this stage, further
information may be requested, before
either accepting or rejecting the
supplier/contractor, who is informed
of the outcome of the assessment.
Based on scores falling within
given ranges, various improvement
actions are recommended. A low
score can result in a physical audit
if appropriate. Although some
suppliers/contractors are rejected,
most are encouraged and helped
to improve in line with ISO 14001.
22 Corporate responsibility report