11.09.2014 Views

Dr. Gordon Christensen The Dangers of - Glidewell Dental Labs

Dr. Gordon Christensen The Dangers of - Glidewell Dental Labs

Dr. Gordon Christensen The Dangers of - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monolithic Versus<br />

Bilayered Restorations:<br />

A Closer<br />

– ARTICLE and CLINICAL PHOTOS by<br />

Gregg Helvey, DDS, MAGD<br />

Abstract<br />

<strong>The</strong> all-ceramic crown was developed in the early 20th century when Charles H. Land patented the allporcelain<br />

“jacket” crown to improve esthetics. This procedure consisted <strong>of</strong> rebuilding the missing tooth<br />

with a porcelain covering, or “jacket” as Land called it. To solve the product’s strength problems, Abraham<br />

Weinstein in the late 1950s introduced a metal core to which porcelain was fused, thus creating the<br />

ceramo-metal crown. Throughout the years, the metal has been substituted with different materials to<br />

achieve a more esthetic result. Problems have been reported with the fusion between the ceramic and the<br />

core, which have resulted in debonding <strong>of</strong> the veneered ceramic. Further investigations in dental material<br />

science have produced tremendous advances in unveiling aspects that have been taken for granted, such<br />

as the bond strength between different materials that comprise the crown restoration. Recently, a lithium<br />

disilicate material that was once used solely as a core material was introduced as an all-ceramic alternative.<br />

This article discusses the strength factors that comprise a monolithic and bilayered ceramic restoration.<br />

Monolithic Versus Bilayered Restorations21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!