13.09.2014 Views

Fatigue Management Program for Canadian Marine Pilots

Fatigue Management Program for Canadian Marine Pilots

Fatigue Management Program for Canadian Marine Pilots

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DEVELOPMENT OF A FATIGUE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FOR CANADIAN MARINE PILOTS<br />

The guidelines consist of:<br />

• How to set-up a two-year implementation plan;<br />

• Guidelines <strong>for</strong> determining when to hold training sessions and workshops; and<br />

• Hints on communicating FMP in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

4.3.4 FMP Evaluation Process<br />

The evaluation process <strong>for</strong> an FMP is described in this section. The FMP must be assessed <strong>for</strong> its<br />

efficacy and practicality. Assessments using questionnaires, interviews, reviews of counselling<br />

documentation, feedback during refresher sessions, in<strong>for</strong>mal comments provided by pilots and<br />

management, and reviews of documentation regarding pilotage per<strong>for</strong>mance, system safety<br />

and incidents, must be conducted on a scheduled basis.<br />

4.3.4.1 Questionnaires and Interviews<br />

<strong>Management</strong> and their pilots will be polled after 12 months to determine how well the FMP has<br />

been functioning, what changes were made along the way, and what improvements might<br />

make the FMP more valid, practical and effective.<br />

4.3.4.2 Counselling In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

The FMP co-ordinator may learn about elements in the FMP process that have problems. This<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation can be used to highlight those areas that require further study (input <strong>for</strong><br />

questionnaire or interview development) or that should be changed.<br />

4.3.4.3 Reporting <strong>Fatigue</strong>-Related Errors and Incidents<br />

Transport Canada can use its existing databases on human error, and can enhance existing<br />

data capture techniques used to identify fatigue as a cause. Errors could be reported to a third<br />

party reporting centre (e.g., a private agency that maintains a completely confidential<br />

database, funded by Transport Canada or the Transportation Safety Board). A standard <strong>for</strong>m<br />

could be developed that allows pilots to enter only in<strong>for</strong>mation pertinent to the nature of the<br />

incident and errors that occurred. The <strong>for</strong>m would not require an individual’s name, or names of<br />

places or other in<strong>for</strong>mation that would allow the identification of the pilot. The reliance on<br />

reasonable identification of circumstances and conditions would suffice. Details about the<br />

relationship of the error to fatigue would be requested, as would any in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding<br />

other potential causes. The FMP co-ordinator would have access to summary data on error rates<br />

<strong>for</strong> different types of errors and associated in<strong>for</strong>mation. Comparisons of the fatigue-related error<br />

rates (per ship movements) <strong>for</strong> pre- and post-FMP implementation would help to show whether<br />

the FMP has helped, and by how much.<br />

If it is not feasible to set up an error reporting system, comparisons of fatigue-related incidents,<br />

adjusted <strong>for</strong> ship movements, may still help to determine the FMP’s efficacy. However, this<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation will be less in<strong>for</strong>mative.<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!