24.09.2014 Views

Effects of planting - hole size, composting animal manure and sack on survival and growth of Eucaliptus camaldulensis , Ziziphus spina - chr isti and Pistasia atlantica planted in Mehran Plain, Iran

This study tested three methods thought to maintain soil moisture availability and thereby improve the performance of three species ( Eucaliptus camaldulensis , Ziziphu s spina - christi and Pistasia atlantica ) when planted in permanent landscape of Mehran plain: increased planting - hole size, composting animal manure and sack addition. Seedlings of the three species were grown in two planting - hole sizes (30*30*30 cm and 100 *100*100 cm), with and without composting animal manure, and with and without sack. The experiment was conducted in site (Mehran plain) in Ilam Province, Iran. Seedling growth and survival were monitored over 30 months. Seedling survival was >90% for all t hree species and did not differ significantly among any of the treatments. High rainfall in winter and autumn throughout and irrigation during the dry season the first year of the experiment may have enhanced seedling survival. Deeper planting - hole had the strongest effect on seedling growth for species, composting animal manure addition and sack had a positive effect on growth for all three species especially Eucaliptus camaldulensis . Seedlings growing in one - meter holes with composting animal manure and s ack had most height and diameter. The development and total number of roots were much better at this depth as compared to surface planting. Deep planting provides resistance to cyclones and induces earlier flowering and higher yields

This study tested three methods thought to maintain soil moisture availability and thereby improve the
performance of three species (
Eucaliptus camaldulensis
,
Ziziphu
s spina
-
christi
and
Pistasia atlantica
) when
planted in permanent landscape of Mehran plain: increased planting
-
hole size, composting animal manure and
sack addition. Seedlings of the three species were grown in two planting
-
hole sizes (30*30*30 cm and
100
*100*100 cm), with and without composting animal manure, and with and without sack. The experiment was
conducted in site (Mehran plain) in Ilam Province, Iran. Seedling growth and survival were monitored over 30
months. Seedling survival was >90% for all t
hree species and did not differ significantly among any of the
treatments. High rainfall in winter and autumn throughout and irrigation during the dry season the first year of
the experiment may have enhanced seedling survival. Deeper planting
-
hole had the
strongest effect on seedling
growth for species, composting animal manure addition and sack had a positive effect on growth for all three
species especially
Eucaliptus
camaldulensis
. Seedlings growing in one
-
meter holes with composting animal
manure and s
ack had most height and diameter. The development and total number of roots were much better at
this depth as compared to surface planting. Deep planting provides resistance to cyclones and induces earlier
flowering and higher yields

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J. Bio. & Env. Sci. 2014<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

The dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for faster-grow<strong>in</strong>g, bigger <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> better<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>gs has been ever-grow<strong>in</strong>g. As a result, forest<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g producti<strong>on</strong> is a c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>ually evolv<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

technology <strong>in</strong> afforestati<strong>on</strong>. Evaluat<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

quality is crucial for underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

development <strong>in</strong> the nursery, as well as subsequent<br />

field <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>survival</strong> (Ffoliot et al, 1995; Iqbal,<br />

1986; Kaul, 1970).<br />

The success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> afforestati<strong>on</strong> depends <strong>on</strong> a wide range<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g site c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s, species<br />

character<strong>isti</strong>cs, the specific <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> techniques <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

treatments applied, as well as social <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

factors (Evans, 1996). While there has been extensive<br />

silvicultural study for plantati<strong>on</strong> establishment <strong>in</strong> the<br />

dry l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s generally (Evans, 1996), the <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong><br />

available for <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> native <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-native tree<br />

species <strong>in</strong> <strong>Iran</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>s limited (Ahmadi et al, 2013;<br />

Jazireiee, 1998). Seedl<strong>in</strong>g establishment is c<strong>on</strong>sidered<br />

a crucial stage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tree regenerati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> it has been<br />

fairly widely reported that the success <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

establishment depends <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods<br />

(Alex<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>er <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Stuart, 2003; Davies, 1988). A<br />

detailed underst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the factors c<strong>on</strong>troll<strong>in</strong>g<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>survival</strong> is required for<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrichment <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

showed negative impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> (Rose et al.,<br />

1997; Amid<strong>on</strong> et al., 1982; Ba<strong>in</strong>bridge, 1994; L<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>is<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Dumroese, 2006). The <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> may be filled<br />

with topsoil from the surround<strong>in</strong>g area, mixed with<br />

the recommended quantity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertilizer or <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Animal <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> is very beneficial to the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs, due<br />

to its great water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the micr<strong>on</strong>utrients<br />

that will become available with its<br />

decompositi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

In this study, we c<strong>on</strong>ducted a field experiment to test<br />

three methods thought to enhance below-ground<br />

humidity availability, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thereby improve the<br />

performance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs when <strong>planted</strong> to enrich<br />

degraded dry l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. The three methods were: <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>sack</str<strong>on</strong>g> additi<strong>on</strong> to floor <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>,<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>creased <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Compost<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>animal</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>manure</str<strong>on</strong>g> availability may str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

limit seedl<strong>in</strong>g performance. Sack is thought to help <strong>in</strong><br />

soil moisture retenti<strong>on</strong> (Evans, 1996; Suhaili et al.,<br />

1998). The <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>to which seedl<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />

<strong>planted</strong> may also significantly affect seedl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>survival</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>growth</strong> through changes <strong>in</strong> soil aerati<strong>on</strong>, root<strong>in</strong>g<br />

density, or rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>filtrati<strong>on</strong>. The <strong>survival</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>growth</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Eucaliptus</strong> <strong>camaldulensis</strong>,<br />

<strong>Ziziphus</strong> <strong>sp<strong>in</strong>a</strong>- <strong>chr</strong><strong>isti</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Pistasia</strong> <strong>atlantica</strong> under<br />

these three different <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods were<br />

m<strong>on</strong>itored <strong>in</strong> barren l<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> western<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Iran</strong>.<br />

Plant<strong>in</strong>g method is <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> factors that affect most<br />

seedl<strong>in</strong>g performance <strong>in</strong> the field. Whether big<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> is a favorable practice to tree <strong>growth</strong> or<br />

not, rema<strong>in</strong>s as a c<strong>on</strong>troversial issue. There are lots <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

reports <strong>in</strong> both side <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the op<strong>in</strong>i<strong>on</strong>. Some authors<br />

agree about the advantages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> bigger <str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

(Shipman, 1960; Stroempl, 1990; Paters<strong>on</strong>, 1997).<br />

Specifically for Eucalyptus, Goes (1977) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ahmadi<br />

(2013) recommended seedl<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong> deeper<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>size</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Also FAO (1981) recommended seedl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g> the root collar a little below the surface <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />

soil. The deeper <str<strong>on</strong>g>plant<strong>in</strong>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>hole</str<strong>on</strong>g> supposed advantages<br />

for proximity to get more underground water<br />

reserves. In disagree with previous reports, other<br />

Material <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> methods<br />

Study sites<br />

The experiment was c<strong>on</strong>ducted <strong>in</strong> <strong>Mehran</strong> pla<strong>in</strong>,<br />

which is located <strong>in</strong> the Southern Ilam prov<strong>in</strong>ce <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>Iran</strong>. <strong>Mehran</strong> county <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g arid regi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>Iran</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> the vegetati<strong>on</strong> is not appropriate <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

turned <strong>in</strong>to desert. This site are <strong>in</strong> the lowl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!