02.10.2014 Views

Brown bear Ursus arctos - Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde

Brown bear Ursus arctos - Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde

Brown bear Ursus arctos - Dabas aizsardzības pārvalde

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

Despite its rarity in modern Latvia, brown <strong>bear</strong> <strong>Ursus</strong> <strong>arctos</strong> is a typical mammal species of the East<br />

Baltic that came to the territory of Latvia after the last Ice Age, i.e., about 9,000-11,000 years ago<br />

(Tauriņš 1982; Timm et al. 1998). In the end of the 19th – beginning of the 20th century, the Latvian<br />

brown <strong>bear</strong> population was totally destroyed and there is no evidence of breeding in the territory of Latvia<br />

for more than 100 years. Looking at this fact superficially, it is unclear why there are so few <strong>bear</strong>s in the<br />

country that on the whole still has got very rich biodiversity while in neighbouring Estonia <strong>bear</strong><br />

population is so big that it should be regulated by hunting. At the same time, it is possible that the<br />

absence of <strong>bear</strong>s in the habitat has a smaller impact on other species compared to other large carnivores –<br />

wolves, lynx and wolverines (that are extinct in Latvia). Bear’s ecological niche is not so unique and<br />

overlaps with other, more numerous species, such as badger, pine marten and wild boar. Besides, these<br />

food competitors of the brown <strong>bear</strong> breed much quicker and adapt to the human presence much easier.<br />

As the largest European predator with a relatively long life expectancy and seasonally divided life cycle,<br />

<strong>bear</strong> has a lot of specific requirements in relation to its environment. These requirements are related to the<br />

rest of the natural environment, human activities and also such environmental factors as climate. Due to<br />

the scarcity of <strong>bear</strong>s in Latvia, the inventory of these requirements in Latvia is still not finished, therefore,<br />

we are unable to provide any specific recommendations for habitat conservation and improvement,<br />

including establishment of new protected areas which is usually the most essential measure in rare species<br />

conservation. It is much more important at the moment to carefully monitor population development and<br />

to ensure cooperation between the relevant institutions as well as to inform and raise awareness amongst<br />

the general public.<br />

The most important task at the moment is to assess as fully as possible human – <strong>bear</strong> coexistence. This<br />

assessment should be based both on the local and international experience. At the same time one has to<br />

realise that if the <strong>bear</strong> conservation is successful and its protection regime is increased, it is likely that<br />

these animals will come into contact with humans more and more often and that will be the determining<br />

factor for the brown <strong>bear</strong>’s future in our country.<br />

The goal of the updated <strong>bear</strong> action plan is to provide the existing species conservation system with<br />

the newest scientific information and experience obtained since 2003. The most significant difference<br />

in the updated plan is a broader, more regional approach and a stronger emphasis on species<br />

conservation measures in Latvia in close connection with the status on the Baltic population level.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!