Analytic continuation of Spacetime Metrics
Analytic continuation of Spacetime Metrics
Analytic continuation of Spacetime Metrics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Where are we?<br />
-if singularities can be observed from the rest <strong>of</strong> spacetime causality may break down -><br />
physics loses its predictive power. The existence <strong>of</strong> BH = conundrum<br />
-facts: matter reaches the speed <strong>of</strong> light, hits the singularity, feeds the BH with information<br />
that can be used to create conditions <strong>of</strong> predictability <strong>of</strong> the infinite past.<br />
It may be possible to “feed” the initial conditions <strong>of</strong> the spacetime metric to be primarily<br />
created.<br />
We may possess the current conditions to “predict” the past initial conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spacetime topology.<br />
Which comes first? (circular cause and consequence): singularity as a necessary condition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the metric or matter reaching the singularity causes the spacetime fabric to break.<br />
Our hypothesis could answer the question and close the circle.<br />
– infinite forces are acting<br />
– laws <strong>of</strong> physics break down<br />
– “The stability <strong>of</strong> EH require exotic matter violating the<br />
average null energy condition”<br />
- quantum gravity/string theory may help ?<br />
-no problem as long as a singularity is shielded from the<br />
outside world by an EH. Accept CCC?<br />
-unpredictability created by the presence <strong>of</strong> singularities<br />
-censorship proposal doesn’t eliminate the possibility <strong>of</strong> as thunderbolts (Hawking 1993,<br />
Penrose 1978). -‘wave <strong>of</strong> singularity’<br />
-what forms first, singularity or apparent horizon (trapped surface)?