19.10.2014 Views

an analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders

an analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders

an analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8 HUEBNER F.DOC 11/1/2006 8:49:12 AM<br />

PAROLE DECISION MAKING 989<br />

APPENDIX B. ELEMENTS OF THE PAROLE<br />

READINESS SCORE<br />

ACTIVE SENTENCE SCORE<br />

Aggravating conditions include: (1) weapon or threat <strong>of</strong> weapon, (2)<br />

serious force or injury, (3) property loss or damage > $5,000, (4) excessive<br />

violence or cruelty, (5) <strong>sex</strong>ual <strong>of</strong>fense; (6) victim tr<strong>an</strong>sported or held<br />

captive, (7) multiple victims, (8) victim unusually vulnerable, (9) <strong>of</strong>fender<br />

was leader, (10) designated career criminal, (11) designated drug<br />

trafficker, <strong>an</strong>d (12) designated org<strong>an</strong>ized crime.<br />

Mitigating factors include: (1) situational crime; (2) <strong>of</strong>fender played<br />

minor role in the crime.<br />

PRIOR CRIMINAL RECORD SCORE<br />

The elements that make up a criminal record include: (1) number <strong>of</strong><br />

adult assaultive misdeme<strong>an</strong>ors, (2) number <strong>of</strong> jail sentences, (3) number <strong>of</strong><br />

felony convictions, (4) number <strong>of</strong> assaultive felony convictions, (5)<br />

number <strong>of</strong> prison terms, (6) number <strong>of</strong> probation or <strong>parole</strong> failures, (7) on<br />

probation or <strong>parole</strong> at the time <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fense, (8) number <strong>of</strong> juvenile<br />

incarcerations, <strong>an</strong>d (9) number <strong>of</strong> terms on juvenile probation.<br />

CONDUCT SCORE<br />

The conduct score is based on (1) the number <strong>of</strong> misconduct reports in<br />

the last 5 years; (2) the number <strong>of</strong> misconduct reports in the last year; (3)<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> assault, <strong>sex</strong>ual misconduct, homicide, or riot misconducts in<br />

the last 5 years; (4) the number <strong>of</strong> security reclassification increases in the<br />

last 5 years; <strong>an</strong>d (5) the number <strong>of</strong> security reclassification increases in the<br />

last year.<br />

STATISTICAL RISK SCORE<br />

Risk is designated by the department <strong>of</strong> corrections based on a security<br />

classification screening instrument that includes measures <strong>of</strong>: (1) number<br />

<strong>of</strong> past assaultive felony convictions, (2) juvenile or adult escape attempts,<br />

(3) dishonorable discharge from the military, (4) major pending felony<br />

charges or detainer, (5) identification as a homo<strong>sex</strong>ual predator, <strong>an</strong>d (6)<br />

classified to administrative segregation in past 3 years.<br />

AGE SCORE<br />

Inmates are r<strong>an</strong>k ordered based on the following age categories: < 22,<br />

23 <strong>an</strong>d 24, 25–27, 28–30, 31–35, 36–40, 41–50, 50+.<br />

PROGRAM PERFORMANCE SCORE<br />

Participation in work, school, <strong>an</strong>d therapy are assessed <strong>using</strong> five<br />

criteria: (1) no inadequacies, (2) more adequate th<strong>an</strong> inadequate, (3)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!