22.10.2014 Views

compilation of national accounts statistics in india: a ... - Mimts.org

compilation of national accounts statistics in india: a ... - Mimts.org

compilation of national accounts statistics in india: a ... - Mimts.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Journal <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come and wealth, Vol. 29, No. 1, January-June 2007<br />

COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS<br />

IN INDIA: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE<br />

Ramesh Kolli<br />

National Accounts Division, Central Statistical Organisation<br />

JELClassification: E01<br />

National Income estimation has a long history <strong>in</strong> India. Several <strong>national</strong> and<br />

<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>national</strong> experts have made contributions <strong>in</strong> enrich<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> India. The paper provides a historical record <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development and the current status <strong>of</strong> the National Accounts Statistics <strong>in</strong> India.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

I. Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Income before Independence<br />

The <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimation has a long history <strong>in</strong> India and several attempts were made <strong>in</strong><br />

the past by <strong>in</strong>dividual economists and researchers to estimate the <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> the country. The<br />

<strong>in</strong>itial focus <strong>of</strong> these researchers was on comput<strong>in</strong>g nation’s <strong>in</strong>come. Though the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come are available on regular basis s<strong>in</strong>ce 1948-49 (first published <strong>in</strong><br />

1956), as many as 44 po<strong>in</strong>t estimates <strong>of</strong> either the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come or <strong>in</strong>come relat<strong>in</strong>g to a part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the country (for example, a state) are available <strong>in</strong> the literature cover<strong>in</strong>g the period rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from the second half <strong>of</strong> the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century to 1948-49. The statement present<strong>in</strong>g certa<strong>in</strong><br />

broad details about these estimates, reproduced from Mukherjee (1969), is at Annex-1. All these<br />

efforts were based essentially on macro level data and <strong>in</strong>volved a number <strong>of</strong> assumptions for<br />

want <strong>of</strong> requisite data and adequate resources, and, therefore, these estimates were not<br />

comparable. However, these studies provided a base for post Independence work on the subject<br />

and for the preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come on a scientific and regular basis.<br />

II. National Income Committee<br />

After Independence, attention was paid to the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>come and related aggregates. Recognis<strong>in</strong>g the need for provid<strong>in</strong>g estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>come on a regular basis, the Government <strong>of</strong> India set up a High Powered Expert Committee<br />

<strong>in</strong> 1949 known as “National Income Committee” under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. P.C.<br />

Mahalanobis, with Pr<strong>of</strong>. D.R. Gadgil and Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.K.R.V. Rao as members, to make<br />

recommendations regard<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates, the improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

the statistical data base on which the estimates were to be based and to suggest measures to<br />

promote research <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come.<br />

For assist<strong>in</strong>g the Committee, a ‘National Income Unit (NIU)’ was set up <strong>in</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>ance. This Committee provided the estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come for the entire Indian<br />

Union, for the first time. The estimates and details <strong>of</strong> methodology adopted were published <strong>in</strong><br />

the First and F<strong>in</strong>al reports <strong>of</strong> the National Income Committee brought out by the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> 1951 and 1954, respectively. The Committee recommended preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>come estimates on a regular (annual) basis.


94 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

Accept<strong>in</strong>g this recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Committee, the Government <strong>of</strong> India transferred<br />

the entire establishment <strong>of</strong> NIU, then work<strong>in</strong>g for the National Income Committee, to the<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance to take charge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come work, on a regular basis. The NIU<br />

was subsequently transferred to the Central Statistical Organisation (CSO) <strong>in</strong> 1954 and later a<br />

full-fledged National Income Division (NID) was created <strong>in</strong> the CSO. The NID is now<br />

designated as the National Accounts Division (NAD) <strong>in</strong> conformity with the expansion <strong>of</strong> its<br />

activity, beyond mere <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come.<br />

While execut<strong>in</strong>g its responsibilities, the National Income Committee received the advisory<br />

help <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>national</strong> experts namely, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Simon Kuznets, National Bureau <strong>of</strong> Economic<br />

Research, USA; Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.R.N. Stone, Department <strong>of</strong> Applied Economics, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Cambridge and Dr. J.B.D. Derksen, National Income Unit, United Nations Statistical Office.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Simon Kuznets reviewed comprehensively the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates and related<br />

aggregates <strong>of</strong> India and presented his report <strong>in</strong> January, 1957 where<strong>in</strong> he <strong>of</strong>fered several<br />

suggestions ma<strong>in</strong>ly relat<strong>in</strong>g to (a) status <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come as it emerged <strong>in</strong> the report <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Income Committee and annual publications, National Accounts Statistics (b) other<br />

aspects and distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come which need to be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> this publication on<br />

regular basis, (c) tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates and character <strong>of</strong> their presentation and<br />

(d) <strong>in</strong>stitutional arrangements. He reiterated the suggestions <strong>of</strong> National Income Committee for<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g up <strong>of</strong> an Advisory Committee compris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> established authorities, to guide the future<br />

course <strong>of</strong> action and allied matters relat<strong>in</strong>g to the estimation <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come and related<br />

aggregates. He emphasized that Advisory Committee members should be given the opportunity<br />

to shape the course <strong>of</strong> work <strong>in</strong> this field which is <strong>of</strong> utmost importance to the development <strong>of</strong><br />

economic <strong>in</strong>telligence <strong>in</strong> the country. Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.R.N. Stone who visited India <strong>in</strong> 1950-51 as an<br />

Adviser to the then National Income Committee did considerable work on factor breakdowns<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come, some results <strong>of</strong> which were <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the work<strong>in</strong>g papers <strong>of</strong><br />

the NIU entitled “Memorandum on the Forms <strong>of</strong> Accounts” January, 1951 (mimeo).<br />

The National Income Committee <strong>in</strong> its First Report submitted <strong>in</strong> April, 1951 presented<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> net output <strong>of</strong> Indian Union for 1948-49 along with a framework <strong>of</strong> social<br />

<strong>accounts</strong> which was drawn up by Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.R.N. Stone. In its F<strong>in</strong>al Report, submitted <strong>in</strong><br />

February 1954, the Committee gave the detailed methodology for <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> sectoral<br />

estimates and the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates for the years 1948-49 (improved), 1949-50 and<br />

1950-51.<br />

III.Conventional Series <strong>of</strong> NAS (with base 1948-49)<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g the work <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. J.R.N. Stone, research on <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>in</strong> India was<br />

undertaken by many scholars. Two <strong>of</strong> the earliest papers on the subject were by Dandekar<br />

(1951) and Ghosh (1951), the former discuss<strong>in</strong>g conceptual questions and the latter<br />

present<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>national</strong> account<strong>in</strong>g framework. The First Report <strong>of</strong> the NIC (1951) presented a<br />

simple system <strong>in</strong> which some entries were left blank. Mukherjee (1954 a) attempted to fill <strong>in</strong><br />

some <strong>of</strong> the gaps with almost notional entries and suggested separate urban and rural <strong>accounts</strong><br />

with a connect<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>k. Mukherjee (1954 b) also developed a framework <strong>of</strong> a complete<br />

<strong>in</strong>terflow matrix <strong>of</strong> the type used by Ragnar Frisch. Barpujari (1960) first presented complete<br />

<strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> for India for the years 1951-52 to 1955-56 <strong>in</strong> which the framework given by


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 95<br />

NIC was used. Economic <strong>accounts</strong> for develop<strong>in</strong>g countries were discussed by Mukherjee,<br />

Uma Datta Roy Choudhury and Prasada Rao (1975).<br />

As per the methodology and the pattern <strong>of</strong> presentation recommended by the National<br />

Income Committee, the first <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come were prepared by the CSO<br />

with base year 1948-49 for the estimates at constant prices. These estimates at constant<br />

(1948-49) prices along with the correspond<strong>in</strong>g estimates at current prices and the <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

the Public Authorities were published <strong>in</strong> the publication, “Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Income” <strong>in</strong><br />

1956. This series, commonly known as the “conventional series” cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be published till<br />

1966 under the same title.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

IV. First Revision <strong>of</strong> NAS Series (Base year 1960-61)<br />

With the gradual improvement <strong>in</strong> the availability <strong>of</strong> basic data over the years, a review <strong>of</strong><br />

methodology for <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimation and its extension to other fields <strong>of</strong> macro<br />

economic aggregates was undertaken, with a view to update the database and shift<strong>in</strong>g the base<br />

year from 1948-49 to a more recent year. Special efforts <strong>in</strong> this regard were made for a<br />

comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> all available data, both published and unpublished. The first results <strong>of</strong><br />

these efforts were presented <strong>in</strong> the “National Income Statistics-Proposals for a Revised Series<br />

for <strong>national</strong> Income Estimates, 1955-56 – 1959-60 (CSO, 1961)”. These proposals were<br />

discussed at a specially <strong>org</strong>anized sem<strong>in</strong>ar under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the Indian Association for<br />

Research <strong>in</strong> National Income and Wealth (IARNIW). In the light <strong>of</strong> the views expressed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Sem<strong>in</strong>ar, several follow up studies were undertaken. The proposals, as improved/amended on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> the studies, alongwith estimates as per the revised series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come with<br />

1960-61 as new base for estimates at constant prices were published <strong>in</strong> the “Brochure on the<br />

Revised Series <strong>of</strong> National Product, 1960-61 to 1964-65 (CSO, 1967)” replac<strong>in</strong>g the earlier<br />

series with base 1948-49.<br />

Simultaneously, work on the estimation <strong>of</strong> related aggregates like “capital formation” and<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>g for the years 1960-61 to 1965-66 was also undertaken. These estimates were published<br />

with correspond<strong>in</strong>g methodology <strong>in</strong> two special brochures, (i) “National Income Statistics –<br />

Estimates <strong>of</strong> Capital Formation <strong>in</strong> India, 1960-61 (hereafter referred to as 1960-61 series), the<br />

title <strong>of</strong> the annual publication was changed to “Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Product”.<br />

The coverage <strong>of</strong> the publication was extended gradually from time to time to <strong>in</strong>corporate<br />

the estimates <strong>of</strong> private consumption expenditure, sav<strong>in</strong>g, capital formation, factor <strong>in</strong>comes,<br />

consolidated <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong> the nation and detailed <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong> public sector. The title <strong>of</strong> the<br />

publication was, therefore, aga<strong>in</strong> changed to the present title “ National Accounts Statistics”<br />

(NAS) with effect from January 1975 to depict the expanded scope <strong>of</strong> the publication.<br />

Further, to meet the demand <strong>of</strong> the users a special supplement, “National Accounts<br />

Statistics, 1960-61 to 1972-73 – Disaggregated Tables (CSO, 1975)” was brought out. This<br />

publication <strong>in</strong>cluded disaggregated tables on output, <strong>in</strong>put, value added, private consumption<br />

expenditure, sav<strong>in</strong>g and capital formation. While the publication presented the estimates at<br />

current prices for the years 1960-61 to 1972-73, those at constant (1960-61) prices were<br />

presented for the entire period <strong>of</strong> 1950-51 to 1972-73. From the subsequent issue, the NAS,<br />

1976, all those tables presented <strong>in</strong> the special supplement became regular features <strong>of</strong> the<br />

publication, NAS.


96 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

V . Second Revision <strong>of</strong> NAS Series (Base year 1970-71)<br />

The base year <strong>of</strong> the revised series was subsequently changed from 1960-61 to 1970-71<br />

(here<strong>in</strong>after referred to as 1970-71 series) and the estimates accord<strong>in</strong>g to 1970-71 series were<br />

published <strong>in</strong> NAS, January 1978. These estimates were based on the more current available<br />

data from various sources, like population census, livestock census, various sample surveys<br />

and ad-hoc studies. The scope, coverage and methodology <strong>of</strong> the estimates were same as for<br />

the earlier series <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> NAS October, 1976. Both 1960-61 series and 1970-71 series are<br />

known as “revised series”.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

The detailed methodology <strong>of</strong> estimation and data sources used <strong>in</strong> the revised series was<br />

brought out <strong>in</strong> the special publication entitled “National Accounts Statistics: Sources &<br />

Methods. April 1980 “(CSO, 1980). The subsequent revisions/changes <strong>in</strong> the methodology/<br />

data base were given <strong>in</strong> ‘the Notes on Methodology’ <strong>in</strong> various issues <strong>of</strong> NAS as also <strong>in</strong> a<br />

special article published <strong>in</strong> the Monthly Abstract <strong>of</strong> Statistics, October, 1985. In order to have<br />

comparable series <strong>of</strong> macro economic aggregates result<strong>in</strong>g from the change <strong>of</strong> base year to<br />

1970-71, the estimates for the previous years upto 1950-51 at 1970-71 prices were prepared<br />

and published <strong>in</strong> 1979 and 1980 issues <strong>of</strong> NAS.<br />

VI. Third Revision <strong>of</strong> NAS Series (Base year 1980-81)<br />

The CSO released a new series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> aggregates with 1980-81 as base year<br />

(here<strong>in</strong>after referred to as 1980-81 series) <strong>in</strong> February, 1988. This series was <strong>in</strong>troduced after<br />

a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> the data base as well as methodology employed <strong>in</strong> the estimation <strong>of</strong><br />

various aggregates. It also <strong>in</strong>volved a number <strong>of</strong> revisions aris<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> the conceptual and<br />

methodological improvements as well as latest available data. The revisions brought about for<br />

the 1980-81 series were the results <strong>of</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong> studies undertaken by Reserve Bank<br />

<strong>of</strong> India (RBI), and Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics & Statistics (DESs) <strong>of</strong> the State Governments<br />

and the estimation <strong>of</strong> Consumption <strong>of</strong> Fixed Capital (CFC) based on the estimates <strong>of</strong> fixed<br />

capital stock us<strong>in</strong>g Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) carried out by the NAD. The coverage<br />

<strong>of</strong> the series was enlarged to <strong>in</strong>clude the new State <strong>of</strong> Sikkim. The improvements proposed for<br />

the 1980-81 series were also considered <strong>in</strong> depth at the Pune Sem<strong>in</strong>ar and Conference <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Indian Association for Research <strong>in</strong> National Income & Wealth (IARNIW) held <strong>in</strong> December,<br />

1984 and November, 1985 respectively. These proposals and the consequential changes were<br />

discussed <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> the Advisory Committee on National Accounts at two meet<strong>in</strong>gs specially<br />

convened for this purpose <strong>in</strong> April 1986 and June 1987. The CSO also benefited from the<br />

suggestions received from many other experts <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong>.<br />

Efforts were also made to use as much current data as possible to replace the proportions<br />

based on the old bench-mark surveys. Further, the results <strong>of</strong> the latest Population Census,<br />

Livestock Census, All India Debt & Investment Survey (AIDIS), follow up surveys <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Economic Census (EC), Cost <strong>of</strong> Cultivation Studies (CCS) etc. were made use <strong>of</strong>. Special<br />

mention may be made here <strong>of</strong> the data collected under the programme <strong>of</strong> follow-up surveys <strong>of</strong><br />

EC. The EC and its follow up surveys were particularly designed to fill the data gap perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

to un<strong>org</strong>anized segments <strong>of</strong> the non-agricultural sectors <strong>of</strong> the economy.<br />

The Brochure “New Series on National Accounts Statistics (with 1980-81 as the base<br />

year)” giv<strong>in</strong>g the estimates from1980-81 to 1985-86 as also a brief description <strong>of</strong> the


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 97<br />

important changes/improvements effected <strong>in</strong> the new series vis-à-vis the 1970-71 series was<br />

issued <strong>in</strong> February, 1988.<br />

The various methodological improvements carried out <strong>in</strong> 1980-81 series related to the<br />

revised procedure <strong>of</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> paddy, value added for textile group <strong>in</strong> case <strong>of</strong> unregistered<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, domestic product from Public Adm<strong>in</strong>istration and Defence at constant prices,<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> fixed capital (CFC), consumption <strong>of</strong> textiles and other items <strong>of</strong> private f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

consumption expenditure, change <strong>in</strong> stocks, losses <strong>of</strong> the departmental enterprises <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government etc. Details <strong>of</strong> the changes effected alongwith the results <strong>of</strong> the latest census/<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> data used <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the macro economic aggregates and also <strong>of</strong> the<br />

transactions <strong>of</strong> the public sector are available <strong>in</strong> the publication entitled ‘National Accounts<br />

Statistics-Sources and Methods’ published <strong>in</strong> 1989.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

VII. Fourth Revision <strong>of</strong> NAS Series (Base year 1993-94)<br />

The CSO revised the 1980-81 series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> account aggregates with 1993-94 as base year<br />

(hereafter referred to as 1993-94 series) <strong>in</strong> February, 1999. In the past, National Accounts<br />

Statistics were mostly revised decennially chang<strong>in</strong>g the base to a Year synchroniz<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

year <strong>of</strong> decennial Population Census. It was primarily because the <strong>in</strong>formation on workforce<br />

from the Population Census played an important role and workforce estimates <strong>in</strong> the base year,<br />

which is conducted decennially <strong>in</strong> the years end<strong>in</strong>g with 1. As a sequel to this, this series <strong>of</strong><br />

National Accounts Statistics should have been with the base year 1990-91. However, it was<br />

observed that the data on worker participation rate (WPR) captured by the National Sample<br />

Survey Organisation (NSSO) was better than the one estimated through the Population<br />

Census. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the CSO used the workforce estimates based on National Sample<br />

Survey (NSS) workforce participation rates from the NSS 1993-94 (50 th Round) survey<br />

results, and changed the base year <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> to 1993-94.<br />

Of the various changes/methodological improvements effected <strong>in</strong> the new series, mention<br />

may be made <strong>of</strong> the estimation <strong>of</strong> work force by economic activities us<strong>in</strong>g the workerpopulation<br />

ratio and the workforce participation rates based on the qu<strong>in</strong>quennial survey on<br />

employment and unemployment conducted by the NSSO and the total population as obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from the 1991 Population Census, us<strong>in</strong>g the database on horticultural <strong>statistics</strong> released by the<br />

National Horticulture Board (NHB) <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, coverage <strong>of</strong> the agricultural<br />

production <strong>in</strong> the fore/backyard, floriculture, deep sea fish<strong>in</strong>g, valuation <strong>of</strong> the output <strong>of</strong><br />

prawns and shrimps separately, data on which was available from the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> the contribution <strong>of</strong> tailor<strong>in</strong>g services, public services <strong>in</strong> the quasi-government<br />

bodies and the contribution <strong>of</strong> Employees Provident Fund Organisation <strong>in</strong> the GDP. In the<br />

1980-81 series imputed bank<strong>in</strong>g charges (f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation services <strong>in</strong>directly measured<br />

– FISIM) were be<strong>in</strong>g allocated to only few <strong>org</strong>anised segments <strong>of</strong> the user <strong>in</strong>dustries and f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

consumers. In the 1993-94 series, however, FISIM was allocated to all user <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

with the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the 1993 SNA (which came <strong>in</strong>to existence dur<strong>in</strong>g this period and<br />

prepared under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the Inter Secretariat Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on National Accounts<br />

compris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the European Communities (EUROSTAT), Inter<strong>national</strong> Monetary Fund (IMF),<br />

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), United Nations and World<br />

Bank). Further, methodology for estimat<strong>in</strong>g the output <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>surance services was revised <strong>in</strong><br />

this series, as per the recommendations <strong>of</strong> 1993 SNA.


98 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

The 1993-94 series <strong>in</strong>volved a number <strong>of</strong> revisions aris<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> conceptual and<br />

methodological improvements as well as use <strong>of</strong> latest available data. The comprehensive<br />

revisions <strong>in</strong> this series were based on a few studies <strong>in</strong>itiated by the CSO. Particular mention<br />

may be made <strong>of</strong> the three groups (separately for agriculture, <strong>in</strong>dustry and services)<br />

compris<strong>in</strong>g representatives <strong>of</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istries and external specialists to exam<strong>in</strong>e the issue<br />

relat<strong>in</strong>g the under estimation <strong>of</strong> the GDP. The suggestions <strong>of</strong> these groups were helpful <strong>in</strong> the<br />

base revision exercise particularly <strong>in</strong> locat<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>of</strong> underestimation and <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

alternative sources <strong>of</strong> data for the purpose. Some <strong>of</strong> the proposals lead<strong>in</strong>g to the changes<br />

employed <strong>in</strong> the new series were discussed <strong>in</strong> the Golden Jubilee Sem<strong>in</strong>ar <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />

Association for Research <strong>in</strong> National Income and Wealth (IARNIW) held at the Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Growth, University <strong>of</strong> Delhi dur<strong>in</strong>g 24-26 July 1998 and also at the jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Inter<strong>national</strong> Conference <strong>of</strong> the IARNIW and Inter<strong>national</strong> Association for Research <strong>in</strong><br />

Income and Wealth held at New Delhi dur<strong>in</strong>g 16-20 November 1998. The changes effected <strong>in</strong><br />

the new series <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> methodology, use <strong>of</strong> alternative data sources and the consequential<br />

changes <strong>in</strong> the estimates were also deliberated upon <strong>in</strong> detail by the Advisory Committee on<br />

National Accounts under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Dr. Rakesh Mohan, <strong>in</strong> its meet<strong>in</strong>gs held on 19th<br />

August 1998, 6th November 1998, 19th January 1999 and 27 th January 1999.<br />

VIII. Current Series <strong>of</strong> NAS (Base year 1999-2000)<br />

The CSO revised the 1993-94 series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> account aggregates with 1999-2000 as base<br />

year (hereafter referred to as new series) <strong>in</strong> February, 2006. The three major components<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g the present revision exercise <strong>in</strong>clude (i) revision <strong>of</strong> base year to a more recent year<br />

(for mean<strong>in</strong>gful analysis <strong>of</strong> the structural changes <strong>in</strong> the economy), (ii) complete review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g data base and methodology employed <strong>in</strong> the estimation <strong>of</strong> various macro-economic<br />

aggregates <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g choice <strong>of</strong> the alternative databases on <strong>in</strong>dividual subjects and (iii) to the<br />

extent feasible, implement<strong>in</strong>g the recommendations <strong>of</strong> 1993 SNA.<br />

At the time <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g the previous series with base year 1993-94, the CSO had<br />

announced that the future base year NAS series revisions would take place co<strong>in</strong>cid<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

NSS qu<strong>in</strong>quennial surveys on employment and unemployment. In cont<strong>in</strong>uation with the<br />

practice <strong>of</strong> adopt<strong>in</strong>g NSS employment and unemployment survey data, the new series <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> released on 31 st January, 2006 adopted 1999-2000 as the base year, as it has<br />

used the data on WPR from the NSS 55 th Round survey on Employment and Unemployment,<br />

conducted <strong>in</strong> 1999-2000. In the new series, the WPR data has been used <strong>in</strong> conjunction with<br />

population data <strong>of</strong> the Population Census, 2001.<br />

In addition to us<strong>in</strong>g the results <strong>of</strong> above surveys and censuses, the CSO entrusted a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> studies to the State Governments, the Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Cooperation, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture (DESAg) and the Socio-<br />

Economic Research Centre (SERC), a Delhi based NGO, for updat<strong>in</strong>g the rates and ratios used<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong>. The CSO also conducted a study on yield rates <strong>of</strong><br />

meat, meat products and meat by-products through its own personnel to update the old rates<br />

and ratios for these items. The results <strong>of</strong> the type studies considered for <strong>in</strong>corporation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

new series relate to those conducted by (i) SERC on rates and ratios <strong>in</strong> agriculture sector,<br />

(ii) CSO on yield rates for meat, meat products and meat by-products, (iii) CSO on yield rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> camel hair and pig bristles, (iv) DESAg on market charges paid by the farmers,


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 99<br />

(v) Directorate <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics, Government <strong>of</strong> Haryana, on <strong>in</strong>put rates for <strong>in</strong>land<br />

fish<strong>in</strong>g, and (vi) Indian Council for Forest Research Education (ICFRE) on output <strong>of</strong> forest<br />

products.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Improvements <strong>in</strong> Coverage<br />

The improvements <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> coverage <strong>in</strong> the new series <strong>in</strong> the GDP estimates have ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

been <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> production <strong>of</strong> (i) salt through seawater evaporation, (ii) betel leaves (for<br />

States <strong>of</strong> Assam & West Bengal), (iii) toddy, (iv) goat milk (<strong>in</strong> 16 States/UTs), buffalo milk (<strong>in</strong><br />

5 States/UTs) and camel milk hav<strong>in</strong>g economic value and not presently covered <strong>in</strong> the<br />

production data, (v) duck eggs (<strong>in</strong> 15 States/UTs), and (vi) meat production from unregistered<br />

slaughter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the States where the same is presently not covered <strong>in</strong> the production estimates.<br />

Further, capital expenditures <strong>in</strong>curred on (i) seven new tree crops dur<strong>in</strong>g the gestation period,<br />

and (ii) <strong>in</strong>stallation <strong>of</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d energy systems, are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the estimates <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong><br />

construction sector, as well as <strong>in</strong> the capital formation. A new category <strong>of</strong> ‘valuables’,<br />

cover<strong>in</strong>g the expenditures made on acquisition <strong>of</strong> valuables namely gold, jewellery, etc. has<br />

been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the gross capital formation, but as a separate category outside the Gross<br />

Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF) and Change <strong>in</strong> Stocks, <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the recommendations <strong>of</strong><br />

1993 SNA.<br />

In addition to the above, economic activities like (i) other private communication,<br />

(ii) rent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> mach<strong>in</strong>ery and other equipment without operator, (iii) computer related activities<br />

<strong>in</strong> un<strong>org</strong>anized segment, (iv) coach<strong>in</strong>g centers, (v) social work with accommodation, and<br />

(vi) recreation and cultural and support<strong>in</strong>g activities, have been taken <strong>in</strong>to account as per the<br />

latest available data from the NSS 55 th and NSS 57 th Rounds. These activities were not<br />

adequately captured <strong>in</strong> the earlier series, but were explicitly def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the National Industrial<br />

Classification, 1998, accord<strong>in</strong>g to which the NSSO collected the data <strong>in</strong> these Rounds.<br />

Improvements <strong>in</strong> the Procedures <strong>of</strong> Compilation<br />

The important procedural changes made <strong>in</strong> the new series are (i) use <strong>of</strong> the production data<br />

provided by the National Horticulture Board (NHB) for all horticultural crops (with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> those covered under pr<strong>in</strong>cipal crops) and the price data provided by the State<br />

Directorates <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics (State DESs) for all crops; (ii) <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> a new<br />

basic material, ‘fixtures and fitt<strong>in</strong>gs’ <strong>in</strong> the construction sector <strong>in</strong> addition to the exist<strong>in</strong>g 4<br />

basic materials for estimat<strong>in</strong>g the value <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong> construction sector; (iii) nett<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

reta<strong>in</strong>ed reserves and dividends paid from the property <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> mutual funds for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g the output <strong>of</strong> bank<strong>in</strong>g sector; (iv) align<strong>in</strong>g the estimates <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

formation by <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>of</strong> use with those <strong>of</strong> assets/<strong>in</strong>stitutions; (v) adjust<strong>in</strong>g for re<strong>in</strong>vested<br />

earn<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> India <strong>of</strong> foreign companies <strong>in</strong> the estimates <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> private corporate sector<br />

and the consequential changes <strong>in</strong> the external transactions account; (vi) <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the private<br />

corporate sector’s GFCF, the domestic consumption <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware (net <strong>of</strong> public sector<br />

purchases) and the expenditures <strong>in</strong>curred on construction <strong>of</strong> assets by the newly set up<br />

companies before they commence production; and (vii) treat<strong>in</strong>g the operat<strong>in</strong>g losses <strong>of</strong><br />

departmental commercial undertak<strong>in</strong>gs as imputed subsidies, <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the practice currently<br />

followed for irrigation departments.


100 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> Rrecommendations <strong>of</strong> 1993 SNA<br />

While undertak<strong>in</strong>g the exercise for the new base year, efforts were also made to implement the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the 1993 System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts (1993 SNA) to the extent data are<br />

available. Some <strong>of</strong> the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the 1993 SNA which presently form part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

new series are:<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> non-market agricultural crops on the basis <strong>of</strong> prices <strong>of</strong> similar products<br />

made by market producers and their <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> the production boundary;<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> own-account production <strong>of</strong> hous<strong>in</strong>g services by owner-occupiers and <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic and personal services produced by employ<strong>in</strong>g paid domestic staff;<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> premium supplements <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> life and non-life <strong>in</strong>surance output<br />

estimates;<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> re<strong>in</strong>vested earn<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> foreign direct <strong>in</strong>vestors <strong>in</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the world<br />

account. This treatment affects gross <strong>national</strong> product, sav<strong>in</strong>g and capital formation;<br />

imputed value <strong>of</strong> own-account labour treated as mixed <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> self-employed;<br />

expenditures on m<strong>in</strong>eral exploration treated as capital expenditure;<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>termediation services <strong>in</strong>directly measured (FISIM) to the<br />

users <strong>of</strong> these services, as <strong>in</strong>termediate consumption to <strong>in</strong>dustries and as f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

consumption to f<strong>in</strong>al users;<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> expenditures on valuables, which are held as stores <strong>of</strong> value, and are<br />

treated as Gross Capital Formation;<br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> expenditures on s<strong>of</strong>tware as Gross capital formation;<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> natural growth <strong>of</strong> livestock as Gross capital formation<br />

<strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>of</strong> expenditures made on few tree crops dur<strong>in</strong>g the gestation period as Gross<br />

capital formation;<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> capital expenditure <strong>in</strong>curred on <strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g the w<strong>in</strong>d energy systems <strong>in</strong> the<br />

Gross Fixed Capital Formation;<br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> fixed capital <strong>of</strong> all fixed assets <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g government<br />

build<strong>in</strong>gs, roads, dams etc. by Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM); and<br />

adopt<strong>in</strong>g the practice <strong>of</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g base year every 5 years.<br />

Consultation with Expert Bodies<br />

The new series <strong>in</strong>volves a number <strong>of</strong> revisions aris<strong>in</strong>g out <strong>of</strong> conceptual and methodological<br />

improvements as well as use <strong>of</strong> latest available data. The comprehensive revisions <strong>in</strong> the new<br />

series are also the results <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> studies <strong>in</strong>itiated by the CSO <strong>in</strong> the recent past and also<br />

the outcomes <strong>of</strong> the two Sub-Committees <strong>of</strong> the Advisory Committee on National Accounts<br />

Statistics, namely, the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Workforce Estimation under the Chairpersonship <strong>of</strong><br />

Smt. Grace Mazumdar, and the Sub-Committee to suggest suitable sources <strong>of</strong> data for area,<br />

production and prices for estimat<strong>in</strong>g value <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong> horticulture crops for the new series<br />

under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Shri Pratap Nara<strong>in</strong>.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the proposals lead<strong>in</strong>g to the changes employed <strong>in</strong> the new series were discussed<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Conference and Sem<strong>in</strong>ar <strong>of</strong> the Indian Association for Research <strong>in</strong> National Income and<br />

Wealth (IARNIW) held at Ooty, Tamil Nadu <strong>in</strong> November, 2004 and at Goa, <strong>in</strong> December,


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 101<br />

2005, respectively. The changes effected <strong>in</strong> the new series <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> methodology, use <strong>of</strong><br />

alternative data sources and the consequential changes <strong>in</strong> the estimates were also deliberated<br />

upon <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> four meet<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the Advisory Committee on National Accounts Chaired by<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.D. Tendulkar and with em<strong>in</strong>ent economists/statisticians and representatives <strong>of</strong><br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, F<strong>in</strong>ance, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India, State<br />

Governments as members, held on May, 2004, December, 2004, August, 2005 and January,<br />

2006.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

IX. Advance Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Income and Expenditure<br />

Keep<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> view the requirements <strong>of</strong> the government, particularly for the annual budget<br />

preparation <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> India, CSO <strong>in</strong>troduced the advance estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> 1993, beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g with the estimates for the year 1992-93. Subsequently on May<br />

2007, CSO also <strong>in</strong>troduced the Advance estimates <strong>of</strong> GDP expenditures, thus reduc<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

time-lag considerably. These estimates are now released on 7 th February or the next work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

day, <strong>of</strong> each year, based on <strong>in</strong>formation available for about 8 months <strong>of</strong> the year on key<br />

economic <strong>in</strong>dicators. The Advance Estimates are revised on 31 st May <strong>of</strong> every year and are<br />

termed as the Revised Estimates. The approach for compil<strong>in</strong>g the advance estimates is broadly<br />

based on the benchmark-<strong>in</strong>dicator method. In this method, for each <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dustry-groups,<br />

namely, agriculture, forestry, fish<strong>in</strong>g, m<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, electricity, gas and water<br />

supply, trade, hotels and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, bank<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

<strong>in</strong>surance, real estate, ownership <strong>of</strong> dwell<strong>in</strong>gs and bus<strong>in</strong>ess services, public adm<strong>in</strong>istration, a<br />

key <strong>in</strong>dicator or a set <strong>of</strong> key <strong>in</strong>dicators for which data <strong>in</strong> volume or quantity terms is available<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the year, are used to extrapolate the value <strong>of</strong> output/value added estimates <strong>of</strong> the<br />

previous year. For example, <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> agriculture sector, the set <strong>of</strong> key <strong>in</strong>dicators are the<br />

advance estimates <strong>of</strong> agriculture production (at <strong>in</strong>dividual crop level) and <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong><br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g sector, the key <strong>in</strong>dicators are the <strong>in</strong>dex <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial production (at 2-digit<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry group level). The benchmark estimates are the previous year’s Annual Estimates. For<br />

the GDP Expenditure aggregates, the <strong>in</strong>dicators used are (i) same sources as used for<br />

production GDP estimates for f<strong>in</strong>al consumption expenditure, (ii) IIP use based classification<br />

for capital goods and imports <strong>of</strong> capital goods, and (iii) the balance <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>statistics</strong> and<br />

foreign trade <strong>statistics</strong>, for net exports.<br />

X. Quarterly Estimates <strong>of</strong> GDP and Expenditures<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g India’s subscription to the Special Data Dissem<strong>in</strong>ation Standards (SDDS) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Inter<strong>national</strong> Monetary Fund (IMF), the CSO <strong>in</strong>troduced the quarterly estimates <strong>of</strong> GDP<br />

start<strong>in</strong>g with the Quarter Jan-Mar 1999, both at constant (1993-94) and current prices. The<br />

quarterly GDP estimates are based on a methodology, which takes <strong>in</strong>to account the quarterly<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> various <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>of</strong> the Indian economy. With reference to agriculture, the<br />

methodology is based on apportion<strong>in</strong>g the season-wise crop production <strong>in</strong>to various quarters<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> “harvest stage approach”, utilis<strong>in</strong>g the Indian Crop Calendar, 1998. For other<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries, the estimates are based on the performance <strong>of</strong> lead<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> each <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>of</strong><br />

the economy, like the production <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>in</strong>land fish, production <strong>of</strong> coal and crude<br />

petroleum, Index <strong>of</strong> Industrial Production, production <strong>of</strong> cement and steel, performance <strong>of</strong><br />

railways, production <strong>of</strong> commercial vehicles, performance <strong>of</strong> civil aviation and cargo handled


102 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

at major ports, postal and telecommunication revenue, aggregate bank deposits, bank credits,<br />

life and non-life <strong>in</strong>surance and government expenditure.<br />

The CSO has also <strong>in</strong>troduced from May 2007 the quarterly estimates <strong>of</strong> Expenditure<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the GDP <strong>in</strong> current and constant (1999-2000) prices, namely the private f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

consumption expenditure, government f<strong>in</strong>al consumption expenditure, gross fixed capital<br />

formation, change <strong>in</strong> stocks, valuables, and net exports.<br />

The quarterly GDP estimates are released on the last work<strong>in</strong>g day, two months after the<br />

reference quarter.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

XI. Flow <strong>of</strong> Fund Accounts<br />

For monitor<strong>in</strong>g the economic development and flows <strong>of</strong> resources across the <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

sectors, Flow <strong>of</strong> Fund Accounts are necessary. The M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance felt the need for such<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation as early as <strong>in</strong> the late fifties and work was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> 1957, jo<strong>in</strong>tly by the CSO and<br />

the Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India (RBI). Attempts were made to construct <strong>accounts</strong> for the<br />

government by the CSO and for the bank<strong>in</strong>g and corporate sectors by the RBI. In 1959, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

H.W. Arndt <strong>of</strong> the Australian National University visited India to exam<strong>in</strong>e the feasibility <strong>of</strong><br />

construction <strong>of</strong> such comprehensive <strong>accounts</strong> for the country. After detailed discussions, he<br />

prepared a memorandum on the subject entitled “F<strong>in</strong>ancial Flows <strong>of</strong> Indian Economy, 1951-52<br />

to 1957-58”. He divided the economy <strong>in</strong>to four broad sectors namely, Government, Banks,<br />

Rest <strong>of</strong> the World and the Residual. The ma<strong>in</strong> field <strong>of</strong> his <strong>in</strong>vestigation was to show how and<br />

<strong>in</strong> what form the domestic sav<strong>in</strong>gs become available to government for f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g its<br />

expenditure and hence he concentrated on f<strong>in</strong>ancial flows conf<strong>in</strong>ed to lend<strong>in</strong>g and borrow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Subsequently, a Work<strong>in</strong>g Group was set up by the CSO <strong>in</strong> 1959 to prepare a Report on the<br />

Flow <strong>of</strong> Fund Accounts. The CSO together with the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance and the RBI prepared<br />

the estimates for the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group. The Report <strong>of</strong> the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group was released <strong>in</strong> 1963<br />

and it furnished a flow <strong>of</strong> fund account for the country <strong>in</strong> 1957-58 that embraced both<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial and non-f<strong>in</strong>ancial flows <strong>in</strong> a consolidated as well as by major <strong>in</strong>stitutional sectors<br />

namely, households, banks, government and rest <strong>of</strong> the world. The government sector was<br />

further sub-divided <strong>in</strong>to general government and government enterprises. The RBI has been<br />

br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g out its studies on f<strong>in</strong>ancial flow <strong>of</strong> funds, the last one be<strong>in</strong>g for the period 1951-52 to<br />

1995-96 brought out <strong>in</strong> August, 2000.<br />

XII. Sav<strong>in</strong>g and Investment<br />

In India, the estimates <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g were attempted <strong>in</strong> the past by different <strong>in</strong>stitutions. The most<br />

important among them were, the Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India (RBI), Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, National<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Applied Economic Research (NEACR) and Central Statistical Organisation. But the<br />

widely accepted estimates <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g are those prepared by the RBI and the CSO. The different<br />

sets <strong>of</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>vestment for a common year prepared by the RBI and CSO<br />

had <strong>of</strong>ten caused confusion <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> the planners and the public. In view <strong>of</strong> this, the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics appo<strong>in</strong>ted a Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Sav<strong>in</strong>g under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. N. Raj <strong>in</strong> May 1981 to (i) undertake a critical review <strong>of</strong> the available estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

sav<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> the economy (ii) their <strong>in</strong>terpretational significance and<br />

(iii) recommend improvements <strong>in</strong> the methods and procedures <strong>of</strong> estimation. The Work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Group submitted its Report <strong>in</strong> February 1982.


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 103<br />

In pursuance <strong>of</strong> the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group, a series <strong>of</strong> meet<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />

held between the <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the RBI and the CSO to reconcile the differences <strong>in</strong> the estimates.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally both <strong>org</strong>anizations agreed on a uniform methodology and database. It was also decided<br />

that each agency would be responsible for the <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> specified sectors<br />

and supply the data to the other agency. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the CSO, now prepares the estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

public sector (both sav<strong>in</strong>g and capital formation) and household sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

assets, life funds, provident and pension funds, while the responsibility <strong>of</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>of</strong> the private corporate sector and that <strong>of</strong> the household sector’s<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> other <strong>in</strong>struments <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial sav<strong>in</strong>g is entrusted to the RBI. This arrangement has<br />

gone a long way <strong>in</strong> clear<strong>in</strong>g the doubts, which earlier used to be created <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> the<br />

users due to two different sets <strong>of</strong> estimates. Now the estimates <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g released by the CSO<br />

and RBI are the same.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Subsequently, the Department <strong>of</strong> Statistics set up an Expert Group on Sav<strong>in</strong>g and Capital<br />

formation under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essor V.M. Dandekar on April 1995 to review the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g methodology and recommend improvements <strong>in</strong> the methods and procedures <strong>of</strong><br />

estimation <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g and capital formation. After the demise <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Dandekar, the Expert<br />

Group was reconstituted on September1995 with the same set <strong>of</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> reference and with<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Raja J. Chelliah as Chairman. The Committee submitted its Report on December<br />

1996.<br />

Although the Committee did not recommend any major changes <strong>in</strong> the <strong>compilation</strong><br />

procedures, its recommendations were more directed towards improv<strong>in</strong>g the quality <strong>of</strong><br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g estimates. These recommendations, <strong>in</strong>cluded, <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> flow <strong>of</strong> funds <strong>accounts</strong>,<br />

updations <strong>of</strong> rates and ratios, regular review <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> fixed assets, improv<strong>in</strong>g the estimates <strong>of</strong><br />

local bodies, cover<strong>in</strong>g top 1500 companies on census basis, for the purpose <strong>of</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capital formation <strong>in</strong> the private corporate sector, exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the feasibility <strong>of</strong> conduct<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>come expenditure surveys on a periodic basis, and launch<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> regular enterprise surveys<br />

by the NSSO for collect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>vestment data for the household sector.<br />

XIII. State Domestic Product<br />

The work on <strong>in</strong>come estimation for the different States <strong>in</strong> India began as early as <strong>in</strong> 1948-49 <strong>in</strong><br />

the erstwhile State <strong>of</strong> Bombay and <strong>in</strong> the States <strong>of</strong> Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. The<br />

first set <strong>of</strong> detailed estimates <strong>of</strong> State Income were first published <strong>in</strong> January 1950 by the<br />

erstwhile state <strong>of</strong> Bombay for the year 1948-49 and subsequently <strong>in</strong> 1951 and 1952 for the<br />

years 1949-50 and 1950-51. Uttar Pradesh on the other hand, was the first State to prepare<br />

estimates with rural-urban distribution <strong>in</strong> 1953 for the year 1947-48 to 1950-51. Later other<br />

States like Madhya Pradesh, Orissa and West Bengal also <strong>in</strong>itiated work on the subject. The<br />

position was reviewed by the Fifth Jo<strong>in</strong>t Conference <strong>of</strong> Central and State Statisticians <strong>in</strong> 1956<br />

and it was recommended that the States should prepare estimates <strong>of</strong> State Income broadly on<br />

the l<strong>in</strong>es followed by the National Income Committee. Simultaneously, with a view to<br />

streaml<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the work and ensur<strong>in</strong>g adoption <strong>of</strong> uniform concepts and def<strong>in</strong>itions to the extent<br />

possible as well as methodologies by the States <strong>in</strong> the preparation <strong>of</strong> estimates <strong>of</strong> State<br />

Domestic Product from the various sectors, the Central Statistical Organisation, on the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary Conference on Research <strong>in</strong> <strong>national</strong> Income held <strong>in</strong><br />

January, 1957, constituted a Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on State Income consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> experts engaged <strong>in</strong>


104 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

State Income estimation from some <strong>of</strong> the major States, CSO and other <strong>org</strong>anizations. The<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> task assigned to them was to review the work done by the State Directorates <strong>of</strong><br />

Economics and Statistics (DESs) with a view to formulat<strong>in</strong>g standard concepts and def<strong>in</strong>itions<br />

and recommend standard methodologies. The Group was also asked to specify the major data<br />

gaps and necessary ways and means to bridge them.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

All the States and Union Territories (except Dadra and Nagar Havel, Daman and Diu and<br />

Lakshadweep) now compile State Income estimates at current and constant prices. All the<br />

states compil<strong>in</strong>g SDP estimates follow by and large the concepts, procedures and databases as<br />

well as base years for constant prices, same as those adopted at the <strong>national</strong> level. However,<br />

due to differences <strong>in</strong> the imputations done at all India level and at state level (for example, the<br />

value added per worker), and multiplicity <strong>of</strong> data supply<strong>in</strong>g agencies <strong>in</strong> the state (for example<br />

agriculture data), the SDP estimates do not add up to the GDP estimates. However, the<br />

difference between the two is about 5 per cent. The CSO undertakes <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

comparable estimates <strong>of</strong> State Domestic Product each year for the use <strong>of</strong> the Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Commission and the F<strong>in</strong>ance Commissions.<br />

One area, where the availability <strong>of</strong> data for preparation <strong>of</strong> National Accounts aggregates all<br />

along been highly unsatisfactory is the <strong>statistics</strong> <strong>of</strong> local bodies and non-departmental<br />

undertak<strong>in</strong>gs (NDCUs) <strong>of</strong> the state governments. In pursuance to the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fourth Conference <strong>of</strong> Central and State Statistical Organisations, a Work<strong>in</strong>g Group was set up<br />

<strong>in</strong> March 1980 with representation from RBI, Department <strong>of</strong> Company Affairs, Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Commission, DES’s, Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Co-operation and CSO to (i) exam<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

data requirements <strong>of</strong> all concerned departments and draw up formats for collection <strong>of</strong> relevant<br />

<strong>statistics</strong> from local bodies and non-departmental undertak<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> state governments and<br />

(ii) formulate the approach to be adopted and recommend an action plan <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g changes, if<br />

any, required <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>frastructure. The group <strong>in</strong> its report submitted <strong>in</strong> November 1981<br />

recommended that (i) <strong>in</strong> all the states, where arrangement for consolidation <strong>of</strong> <strong>statistics</strong> from<br />

the annual statements <strong>of</strong> receipt and expenditure exist, the scope <strong>of</strong> the work should be<br />

extended so as to cover all items <strong>of</strong> the statements <strong>in</strong> the aggregation (ii) where the<br />

consolidation work is not be<strong>in</strong>g done presently, it should be taken up on a priority basis<br />

(iii) DESs should be responsible for the work <strong>of</strong> collection and consolidation <strong>of</strong> the <strong>statistics</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the urban and rural local bodies established under state statutes and (iv) DESs<br />

should also collect and process the f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>statistics</strong> perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to the non-departmental<br />

undertak<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> state governments preferably follow<strong>in</strong>g the methodology adopted by the RBI<br />

for its studies on corporate f<strong>in</strong>ances. The position with regard to the <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong> local bodies<br />

and NDCUs is that NDCU <strong>accounts</strong> are compiled separately and <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the NAS, while<br />

estimates <strong>of</strong> local bodies are <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the overall <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative departments.<br />

XIV. Regional Accounts<br />

A Committee on Regional Accounts, under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee, was<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>in</strong> 1972 which worked dur<strong>in</strong>g 1972-76. Besides recommend<strong>in</strong>g standard<br />

methodologies, it also recommended a set <strong>of</strong> eighteen standard tables to be prepared by all<br />

states. The tables covered, besides domestic product, all the important macro-economic<br />

aggregates like fixed capital formation, current consumption expenditure, transactions <strong>of</strong><br />

public sector and <strong>in</strong>dicators <strong>of</strong> regional development. In its F<strong>in</strong>al Report the committee also


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 105<br />

recommended the appropriate frame-work <strong>of</strong> regional <strong>accounts</strong>. The State DESs follow the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the Committee <strong>in</strong> their endeavor to improve the regional <strong>accounts</strong><br />

<strong>statistics</strong>.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

XV. Indian Participation <strong>in</strong> Inter<strong>national</strong> Comparison<br />

Inter-country comparison <strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong> economic growth is generally done <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> per capita<br />

<strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong> US dollar us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>ficial exchange rates. This, however, is not a satisfactory method<br />

as the exchange rate is not always a valid <strong>in</strong>dicator for measur<strong>in</strong>g the purchas<strong>in</strong>g power <strong>of</strong><br />

currencies. The UN Statistical Office, <strong>in</strong> collaboration with the University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania,<br />

USA undertook a project “Inter<strong>national</strong> Comparison Project (now Programme)-ICP” with the<br />

primary objective <strong>of</strong> evolv<strong>in</strong>g a suitable methodology for establish<strong>in</strong>g a system <strong>of</strong> comparisons<br />

<strong>of</strong> real product and Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Power Parities (PPP) <strong>of</strong> different countries.<br />

In Phase I <strong>of</strong> ICP six countries participated <strong>in</strong> 1967 and 10 countries <strong>in</strong> 1970. In Phase II<br />

<strong>of</strong> the project 10 countries participated <strong>in</strong> 1970 and 16 <strong>in</strong> 1973. In Phase I and II both b<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

and multilateral comparisons were carried out. In Phase III the comparison on similar l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

were made for the year 1975 <strong>in</strong> which 34 countries participated. The countries were classified<br />

<strong>in</strong>to regional groups and comparison was also made with a base country with<strong>in</strong> the region.<br />

India was chosen as base country for ESCAP comparison. From Phase IV, <strong>in</strong> which 60<br />

countries participated for the reference year 1980, regional comparisons were carried out. For<br />

Phase V where<strong>in</strong> 64 countries participated, core country concept was <strong>in</strong>troduced for l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the results <strong>of</strong> regional comparisons to obta<strong>in</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> world comparison. India was one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the core countries <strong>in</strong> Phase V <strong>in</strong> the ESCAP region. The results <strong>of</strong> all the five phases have<br />

been published. Currently Phase VI <strong>of</strong> the ICP is on <strong>in</strong> which core commodity approach has<br />

been proposed <strong>in</strong> place <strong>of</strong> core country approach <strong>of</strong> Phase V, for l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g the regional results.<br />

This project is <strong>of</strong> particular <strong>in</strong>terest to the develop<strong>in</strong>g countries where<strong>in</strong> a large number <strong>of</strong><br />

transactions take place <strong>in</strong> non-monetary terms which are not always evaluated and taken<br />

account <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimation as contrasted to similar transactions <strong>in</strong> the developed<br />

countries. India did not participate <strong>in</strong> Phase VI. In VIIth Phase, 155 countries are participat<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Power Parity Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary Report <strong>of</strong> the 2005 Inter<strong>national</strong> Comparison<br />

Programme <strong>in</strong> Asia and the Pacific has just been (July 2007) brought out by the Asian<br />

Development Bank.<br />

XVI. Input-Output Transactions Tables<br />

An <strong>in</strong>put-output transactions table (IOTT) which describes the productive process <strong>of</strong> the<br />

complete economic system <strong>in</strong> a unified way, is an important analytical tool for analys<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> production <strong>in</strong> the economy. IOTT is part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>tegrated system <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong><br />

account<strong>in</strong>g. The Statistical Office, Department <strong>of</strong> Economics and Social Affairs, United<br />

Nations, has brought out a Technical Manual (Series F No.40, Rev.I) <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g details about<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> IOTT and the various problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>put-output analysis.<br />

The construction <strong>of</strong> IOTT was <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> India <strong>in</strong> the early fifties. The first <strong>in</strong>ter-<strong>in</strong>dustry<br />

table for India was prepared by M. Mukherjee for 1949-50 <strong>in</strong> 1953 which was subsequently<br />

published <strong>in</strong> Sankhya <strong>in</strong> 1954. This table had only 4 sectors and was arrived at by allocat<strong>in</strong>g by<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries the costs <strong>of</strong> various <strong>in</strong>dustrial sectors us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the “First


106 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Report <strong>of</strong> the National Income Committee” and then consolidat<strong>in</strong>g by the four broad sectors.<br />

Uma Datta (1954) prepared a 15 X 15 table for 1949-50. The 15 sector classification used <strong>in</strong><br />

this table was the same as used <strong>in</strong> the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimation. This table helped <strong>in</strong> locat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

some <strong>in</strong>consistencies <strong>in</strong> the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates lead<strong>in</strong>g to their rectification at that time.<br />

A. K. Biswa (1954) prepared a mimeographed paper “Input-output relation among selected<br />

Indian <strong>in</strong>dustries” for the MIT Centre <strong>of</strong> Inter<strong>national</strong> Studies, India Project. The Indian<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Op<strong>in</strong>ion also brought out an IOTT with 19 sectors <strong>in</strong> 1954 for the year<br />

1952-53. Wilfred Malenbaum (1955) <strong>in</strong>cluded a small IOTT <strong>in</strong> his paper “Indian domestic<br />

product, 1951-52 – 1953-54”. R. M. Goodw<strong>in</strong> and T. P. Chowdhury were associated with 12<br />

X 12 table for 1950-51 released by ISI <strong>in</strong> the form <strong>of</strong> a mimeographed paper <strong>in</strong> 1955. A. K.<br />

Chakravarti prepared 36 sector classification IOTT for the year 1953-54 and 1955-56. These<br />

tables alongwith detailed write up was later published by the Statistical Publish<strong>in</strong>g Society <strong>in</strong><br />

the form <strong>of</strong> a book <strong>in</strong> 1968. By this time the work on <strong>in</strong>ter-<strong>in</strong>dustry studies was put on a<br />

systematic basis <strong>in</strong> the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Division <strong>of</strong> the Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) under the<br />

guidance <strong>of</strong> T. P. Chowdhury and R. M. Goodw<strong>in</strong> and a standard 36 sector classification was<br />

adopted. A 36 X 36 IOTT was first prepared <strong>in</strong> mimeographed form which was later published<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Papers on National Income and Allied Topics (PNIAT), Vl.I, 1960. Next, a table for<br />

1953-54 with the same classification was prepared which was published <strong>in</strong> an ECAFE paper,<br />

“Formulat<strong>in</strong>g Industrial Development Programme, Development Techniques Series No.27 <strong>in</strong><br />

1961”. The next 36 X 36 table prepared <strong>in</strong> ISI <strong>in</strong> 1961 related to year 1955-56 follow<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

uniform pattern <strong>of</strong> classification with the earlier tables. This table was enlarged to a 50 X50<br />

table subsequently. All these tables prepared by ISI were at producer’s price. D. V. Ramana<br />

prepared tables for the year 1948-49 to 1958-59 with 50 sector classification us<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly the<br />

ISI tables and <strong>in</strong>cluded them <strong>in</strong> his mimeographed study entitled “National Accounts and<br />

Input-Output Accounts <strong>of</strong> India” at Department <strong>of</strong> Applied Economics, University <strong>of</strong><br />

Cambridge.<br />

The work <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-<strong>in</strong>dustry analysis was shifted from ISI Calcutta to ISI Plann<strong>in</strong>g Unit,<br />

Delhi. The first IOTT at Delhi Unit was prepared by Ashok Rudra and A. S. Manne for the year<br />

1960-61. This table was specifically constructed for the purpose <strong>of</strong> analys<strong>in</strong>g the structure <strong>of</strong><br />

Indian economy <strong>in</strong> 1970-71. Besides the tables prepared by ISI, a 29 X 29 table was prepared<br />

by the Economic Division <strong>of</strong> the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission which was published <strong>in</strong> “Economic<br />

Analysis <strong>in</strong> Input-Output Framework Vol.-I” <strong>in</strong> 1967. At ISI and IOTT with 77 sectors for the<br />

year 1964-65 was prepared by M. R. Saluja <strong>in</strong> which <strong>in</strong>put flows were valuated at factor cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1960-61. Similar to the table <strong>of</strong> Rudra and Manne, this table also covered only a part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

entire economy. At Gokhale Institute <strong>of</strong> Economics & Politics an IOTT with 32 sectors for the<br />

year 1963 was prepared by P. N. Mathur, et al. This table was at purchaser’s price. The<br />

Perspective Plann<strong>in</strong>g Division <strong>of</strong> Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission prepared an IOTT with 66 sectors at<br />

producer’s price for the year 1965. This table was not published but later updated to 1973-74<br />

at 1971-72 producer’s prices and was utilized for prepar<strong>in</strong>g the Approach Paper for the Fifth<br />

Five Year Plan (1974-79).<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the tables mentioned above were not comparable either because they did not<br />

cover the whole economy and were <strong>in</strong>consistent with the <strong>national</strong> Accounts Statistics or they<br />

varied <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> sector classification adopted and system <strong>of</strong> valuation adopted were<br />

different. The CSO jo<strong>in</strong>tly with the Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission undertook the task <strong>of</strong> prepar<strong>in</strong>g an


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 107<br />

IOTT <strong>of</strong> the Indian economy consistent with the NAS <strong>in</strong> 1972. An IOTT at factor cost for the<br />

year 1968-69 was prepared with 225 sector classification follow<strong>in</strong>g the conceptual<br />

framework prescribed <strong>in</strong> the United Nations Revised System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts. An<br />

aggregated version <strong>of</strong> this table with 60 sector classification was published <strong>in</strong> NAS, 1978.<br />

Thereafter, CSO undertook the preparation <strong>of</strong> IOTT for the year 1973-74 on its own. The<br />

detailed 1973-74 IOTT had 115 sectors and it was aggregated <strong>in</strong> to 60 sector table to enable an<br />

overall summary review <strong>of</strong> the transactions. This table was published <strong>in</strong>1981.<br />

The CSO decided to prepare IOTT’s for the Indian Economy every 5 years follow<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

same approach so that <strong>in</strong>formation system may be developed for study <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>put structures, f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

demand pattern etc. <strong>in</strong> due course <strong>of</strong> time. As per this programme further IOTT’s have been<br />

prepared by CSO for the years 1978-79, 1983-84, 1989-90, 1993-94, 1998-99 and 2003- 04.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

At the regional/state level the first available IOTT relates to West Bengal as a whole and<br />

also for Calcutta Metropolitan area for the year 1958 prepared by Dhar (1965). This table was<br />

at producer’s price and had 18 sectors. Rangnekar (1965) constructed an IOTT for Punjab<br />

for the year 1957 which had the entries at producer’s price and consisted <strong>of</strong> 17 sectors. In the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g two decades a large number <strong>of</strong> IOTT’s have been constructed by the different<br />

scholars for different states, namely, for Gujarat relat<strong>in</strong>g to the year 1964-65 at producer’s<br />

price hav<strong>in</strong>g 24 sectors by Alagh and Kashyap (1971), Maharashtra for the year 1963 at<br />

purchaser’s prices hav<strong>in</strong>g 32 sectors by Koti and Santanam (1970), Haryana for the year<br />

1969-70 at producer’s prices with 32 sectors by Bhalla (1974), Bihar for the year 1969-70<br />

have 38 sectors at producer’s prices by Ghosh (1974), Punjab for the year 1969-70 at<br />

producer’s prices hav<strong>in</strong>g 36 sectors by Bhalla (1975), Rajasthan for the year 1970-71 at<br />

producer’s prices hav<strong>in</strong>g 49 sectors by Mehta (1977), Madhya Pradesh for the year 1965 at<br />

producer’s prices hav<strong>in</strong>g 93 sectors by Prakash and Patanker (1978), Assam for the year 1969<br />

at producer’s prices hav<strong>in</strong>g 22 sectors by Barua (1977), Karnataka for the year 1977-78 at<br />

producer’s prices hav<strong>in</strong>g 66 sectors by Panchmukhi (1980) and U. P. for the year 1970-71 at<br />

producer’s prices hav<strong>in</strong>g 93 sectors by State Plann<strong>in</strong>g Institute U. P. Venkatramaiah et al<br />

(1979) constructed 21 regional IOTTs one each for 15 States and 6 Union Territories.<br />

XVII. Role <strong>of</strong> Research Association/Societies <strong>in</strong> the Development <strong>of</strong> NAS<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional research associations/societies have also significantly contributed towards the<br />

quest <strong>of</strong> CSO for improvement and enlargement <strong>of</strong> NAS, which is a cont<strong>in</strong>uous process.<br />

Special mention may be made <strong>of</strong> the Indian Association for Research <strong>in</strong> National Income and<br />

Wealth (IARNIW) and the Indian Econometric Society. IARNIW which is a registered nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitution was formed ma<strong>in</strong>ly with a view to (a) encourage, stimulate and undertake<br />

research <strong>in</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come, wealth and allied fields, (b) hold sem<strong>in</strong>ars, conferences etc. on the<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come, wealth and allied topics, (c) to undertake publication <strong>of</strong> research<br />

studies conducted by the Association as also <strong>of</strong> the papers presented at its Conferences,<br />

Sem<strong>in</strong>ars etc. It has provided forum on several occasions, for discussion on the estimates<br />

prepared by NAD and methods at a penultimate research stage.<br />

Several gaps, deficiencies <strong>in</strong> the data and delay <strong>in</strong> the publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial <strong>statistics</strong><br />

generally places serious limitation on optimal plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the country. The Indian Econometric<br />

Society, <strong>in</strong> a bid to improve upon the exist<strong>in</strong>g data base, <strong>org</strong>anized a sem<strong>in</strong>ar <strong>in</strong> 1972 under the


108 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

leadership <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.R. Rao, which gave constructive suggestions for the improv<strong>in</strong>g the data<br />

base <strong>of</strong> Indian economy. Two sessions <strong>in</strong> this sem<strong>in</strong>ar were exclusively devoted to <strong>national</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>come <strong>statistics</strong> and related aggregates <strong>in</strong> which background papers on “National Income<br />

Statistics” by Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee and “Sav<strong>in</strong>gs, Investment and Consumption” by Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Ashok Rudra were discussed. Biennial Conferences <strong>of</strong> the Central and State Statistical<br />

Organisations have also played useful role <strong>in</strong> provid<strong>in</strong>g forums for discussion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

methodology etc. relat<strong>in</strong>g to the improvement <strong>of</strong> the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

XVIII. Inter<strong>national</strong> Standards on System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts<br />

Official <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> the comparability <strong>of</strong> economic <strong>statistics</strong> dates back at least to 1928. In that<br />

year the League <strong>of</strong> Nations held an Inter<strong>national</strong> Conference Relat<strong>in</strong>g to Economic Statistics to<br />

encourage the <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> such <strong>statistics</strong> and the adoption <strong>of</strong> uniform presentation<br />

methods. The F<strong>in</strong>al Act <strong>of</strong> the Conference stated that <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>national</strong> comparability should be a<br />

goal, especially among countries with sophisticated statistical systems. It urged countries to<br />

consider extend<strong>in</strong>g the scope <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial <strong>statistics</strong> to facilitate <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come<br />

estimates at regular <strong>in</strong>tervals.<br />

In 1939, the League <strong>of</strong> Nations first published <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates, for all or part <strong>of</strong><br />

the period 1929 to 1938 for 26 countries, with half <strong>of</strong> them be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>ficial estimates and others<br />

from academic or private studies. After the Second World War, a need was felt for comparable<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come as a basis for apportion<strong>in</strong>g the expenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>national</strong><br />

<strong>org</strong>anizations. To help address this need, the Sub-committee on National Income Statistics <strong>of</strong><br />

the League <strong>of</strong> Nations Committee <strong>of</strong> Statistical Experts was formed. The Sub-Committee met<br />

<strong>in</strong> December 1945, work<strong>in</strong>g from a memorandum prepared by Richard Stone. The orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

SNA trace back to the Sub-committee’s report published <strong>in</strong> 1947, which recommended a set<br />

<strong>of</strong> n<strong>in</strong>e tables to present <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>statistics</strong>.<br />

By 1950, the United Nations Statistics Office was able to assemble estimates from<br />

country sources, for National Income Statistics, 1938-1948, from 41 countries. An Expert<br />

Group appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the UN met <strong>in</strong> 1952 to formulate a standard system. The result was the<br />

1953 report “A System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts and Support<strong>in</strong>g Tables”. This report presented a<br />

set <strong>of</strong> 6 standard <strong>accounts</strong>. Compared to the 1947 report, the 1953 <strong>accounts</strong> were further<br />

elaborated with respect to capital transactions. It also took the needs <strong>of</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

<strong>in</strong>to consideration.<br />

The System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts recommended by the United Nations <strong>in</strong> 1953 for general<br />

use, popularly known as UNSNA, 1953 has <strong>in</strong>fluenced the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come<br />

<strong>statistics</strong> all over the world. After 2 other editions <strong>of</strong> 1953 SNA <strong>in</strong> 1960 and 1964, the UN<br />

convened an Expert Group meet<strong>in</strong>g, which met for two weeks <strong>in</strong> 1964 bas<strong>in</strong>g its discussion<br />

on a draft paper prepared by Richard Stone. The outcome was the 1968 SNA. This<br />

recommended a set <strong>of</strong> 20 <strong>accounts</strong>, broken <strong>in</strong>to three classes, consolidated <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

nation, production, consumption expenditure and capital f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>accounts</strong> and <strong>in</strong>come and<br />

outlay account and capital f<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>accounts</strong>. Now the UNSNA has aga<strong>in</strong> been revised <strong>in</strong> 1993<br />

to make it more elaborate, comprehensive and harmonized with other systems such as Balance<br />

<strong>of</strong> Payments Statistics, Government F<strong>in</strong>ance Statistics etc. Accounts have also been<br />

partitioned <strong>in</strong>to more detailed sub-<strong>accounts</strong>.


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 109<br />

The heads <strong>of</strong> NAD, CSO, worked as members <strong>of</strong> the Expert Groups <strong>of</strong> the UN to<br />

prepare the UN guidel<strong>in</strong>es s<strong>in</strong>ce the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g. Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee was a member <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Expert Group which prepared the UNSNA and support<strong>in</strong>g tables <strong>in</strong> 1953. Dr. S.G. Tiwari<br />

Scope <strong>of</strong> the <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1993 SNA tables and <strong>accounts</strong><br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Numbers <strong>of</strong> related<br />

tables <strong>of</strong> UN<br />

questionnaire on<br />

SNA<br />

SNA segments Annual Quarterly<br />

<strong>accounts</strong> <strong>accounts</strong><br />

Name <strong>of</strong> SNA segment<br />

Value added, GDP and Employment<br />

2.1 Value added and GDP <strong>in</strong> current prices by <strong>in</strong>dustry M<strong>in</strong> req’t Recomm<br />

2.2 Value added and GDP <strong>in</strong> constant prices by <strong>in</strong>dustry M<strong>in</strong> req’t Recomm<br />

1.1 Expenditures <strong>of</strong> the GDP <strong>in</strong> current prices M<strong>in</strong> req’t Recomm<br />

1.2 Expenditures <strong>of</strong> the GDP <strong>in</strong> constant prices M<strong>in</strong> req’t Recomm<br />

2.3 Value added components by <strong>in</strong>dustry, current prices M<strong>in</strong> req’t Desirable<br />

Employment by <strong>in</strong>dustry M<strong>in</strong> req’t Recomm<br />

Integrated <strong>accounts</strong> and tables, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegrated satellite <strong>accounts</strong><br />

1.3/4.1 Accounts for the total economy M<strong>in</strong> req’t Recomm<br />

Supply and use table Recomm Desirable<br />

5.1 Cross-classification <strong>of</strong> output/value added by<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustries and sectors Recomm<br />

Integrated economic <strong>accounts</strong> *<br />

Tourism <strong>accounts</strong> *<br />

Environmental <strong>accounts</strong> *<br />

Social Account<strong>in</strong>g Matrices<br />

Other socioeconomic <strong>accounts</strong> *<br />

Purpose classification <strong>of</strong> expenditures<br />

3.1 General government f<strong>in</strong>al consumption (and other)<br />

expenditure by purpose <strong>in</strong> current prices Recomm<br />

General government f<strong>in</strong>al consumption expenditure<br />

by purpose at constant prices *<br />

3.2 Individual consumption (and other) expenditures by<br />

purpose <strong>in</strong> current prices Recomm<br />

Individual consumption expenditures by purpose at<br />

constant prices *<br />

Purpose classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate and f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

consumption across all sectors *<br />

Sector <strong>accounts</strong> (until net lend<strong>in</strong>g)<br />

4.2 Rest <strong>of</strong> the world <strong>accounts</strong> (until net lend<strong>in</strong>g) M<strong>in</strong> req’t Recomm<br />

4.3 Non-f<strong>in</strong>ancial corporations sector <strong>accounts</strong><br />

(until net lend<strong>in</strong>g) *<br />

4.4 F<strong>in</strong>ancial corporations <strong>accounts</strong> (until net lend<strong>in</strong>g) Recomm<br />

4.5 General government sector <strong>accounts</strong> (until net lend<strong>in</strong>g) Recomm<br />

4.6 Household sector <strong>accounts</strong> (until net lend<strong>in</strong>g) *<br />

4.7 Non-pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>in</strong>stitutions serv<strong>in</strong>g households sector<br />

<strong>accounts</strong> (until net lend<strong>in</strong>g) *<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ancial and capital stock <strong>accounts</strong> and tables<br />

4.1-4.7 F<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>accounts</strong> for all sectors *<br />

Balance sheets, revaluation and volume changes <strong>in</strong><br />

asset <strong>accounts</strong> *<br />

Asset <strong>accounts</strong> for f<strong>in</strong>ancial assets *<br />

Asset <strong>accounts</strong> for produced assets *<br />

Asset <strong>accounts</strong> for non-produced assets *


110 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

was a member <strong>of</strong> the team which prepared 1968 SNA, Mrs. Uma Datta Roy Choudhury and<br />

Mr. Jagdish Kumar were Expert Group members <strong>of</strong> 1993 SNA. The 1993 SNA was brought<br />

out jo<strong>in</strong>tly by the 5 <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>national</strong> <strong>org</strong>anizations, United Nations, World Bank, Inter<strong>national</strong><br />

Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the<br />

European Union. The 1993 SNA is be<strong>in</strong>g updated and a revised version <strong>of</strong> this is expected to<br />

be released <strong>in</strong> 2008.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

XIX. Current NAS <strong>compilation</strong>s and Advance Release Calendar<br />

As at present, the <strong>compilation</strong>s on <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude the follow<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

◆ GDP and NDP at factor cost by economic activity (annual and quarterly)<br />

◆ GDP by expenditure aggregates (annual and quarterly)<br />

● Private f<strong>in</strong>al consumption expenditure (PFCE)<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Government f<strong>in</strong>al consumption expenditure (GFCE)<br />

Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF)<br />

Change <strong>in</strong> stocks<br />

Net exports (Exports m<strong>in</strong>us imports)<br />

◆ GDP by <strong>in</strong>come method (only at current prices)<br />

● Compensation <strong>of</strong> employees<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Operat<strong>in</strong>g surplus (<strong>org</strong>anized sector)<br />

Mixed <strong>in</strong>come (un<strong>org</strong>anized sector)<br />

Consumption <strong>of</strong> fixed capital<br />

◆ Sav<strong>in</strong>g and capital formation by <strong>in</strong>stitutions<br />

● Household<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Private corporate sector<br />

Household sector<br />

◆ Capital formation by assets<br />

● Construction<br />

●<br />

●<br />

●<br />

Mach<strong>in</strong>ery and equipment<br />

S<strong>of</strong>tware<br />

Valuables<br />

◆ Capital formation by <strong>in</strong>dustries<br />

◆ Public sector transactions<br />

◆ Sources and Methods<br />

◆ State-wise and item-wise value <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong> agricultural crops and livestock products<br />

◆ State-wise and item-wise value <strong>of</strong> output <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>erals<br />

◆ Input-output transactions table<br />

◆ Back series estimates <strong>of</strong> NAS


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 111<br />

The CSO ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s an Advance Release Calendar for the releases on <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong>.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Title <strong>of</strong> Release<br />

Date <strong>of</strong> release<br />

QUARTERLY ESTIMATES OF GDP<br />

1. First quarter (Q1) GDP estimates Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> August (2 months time lag)<br />

2. Second quarter (Q2) GDP estimates Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> November (2 months time lag)<br />

3. Second quarter (Q3) GDP estimates Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> February (2 months time lag)<br />

4. Second quarter (Q4) GDP estimates Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> May (2 months time lag)<br />

ANNUAL NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS<br />

5. Advance Estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come and 7 th or first work<strong>in</strong>g day after 7 th <strong>of</strong> February<br />

expenditure (2 months before the close <strong>of</strong> the year)<br />

6. Revised Advance Estimates <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> May (2 months time lag)<br />

and expenditure<br />

7. Quick Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Income, Consumption Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> January (10 months time lag)<br />

Expenditure, Sav<strong>in</strong>g and Capital Formation<br />

PUBLICATIONS<br />

1. National Accounts Statistics (annual) Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> June<br />

2. Input-Output Transactions Table (5-yearly) Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> September<br />

(time lag 3-1/2 years)<br />

3. Brochure on New Series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> February<br />

<strong>statistics</strong> (after revision <strong>of</strong> base year)<br />

(one month after base year revision)<br />

4. Sources and Methods (after revision <strong>of</strong> base year) Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> March<br />

(fourteen months after base year revision)<br />

5. Back series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>statistics</strong> Last work<strong>in</strong>g day <strong>of</strong> June<br />

(after revision <strong>of</strong> base year)<br />

(Seventeen months after base year revision)<br />

The metadata pages on <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> are available at the IMF’s Dissem<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

Standards Bullet<strong>in</strong> Board (DSBB), which is the website for SDDS, http://dsbb.imf.<strong>org</strong>/<br />

Applications/web/sddscountrycategorylist/?strcode=IND. The CSO’s <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> were<br />

also assessed by the IMF under its programme, “Report on Observance <strong>of</strong> Standards and<br />

Codes (ROSC) <strong>in</strong> 2002. The Report was prepared after exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the <strong>compilation</strong> practices <strong>of</strong><br />

NAS aga<strong>in</strong>st a Data Quality Assessment Framework (DQAF).<br />

XX. Satellite Accounts<br />

In order to analyze a specific field <strong>in</strong> depth us<strong>in</strong>g the SNA framework, the SNA<br />

recommends <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> satellite <strong>accounts</strong>. These <strong>accounts</strong> concentrate on one field to<br />

give a full picture <strong>of</strong> it, <strong>in</strong> a systematic way. These satellite <strong>accounts</strong> allow flexibility with<br />

reference to adoption <strong>of</strong> concepts, procedures and classifications, without disturb<strong>in</strong>g the core<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong>. For example, the tourism satellite <strong>accounts</strong> adopt an <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

classification which cuts across all the <strong>in</strong>dustrial sectors as per UN’s Inter<strong>national</strong> Standards<br />

Industrial Classification (ISIC). Similarly, for household satellite <strong>accounts</strong>, the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

production boundary can be extended to capture some non-market voluntary services.<br />

The responsibility for compil<strong>in</strong>g the satellite <strong>accounts</strong> lies with the respective agencies that<br />

are responsible for collect<strong>in</strong>g and dissem<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>statistics</strong> on the related subjects. The National<br />

Accounts Division provides any technical expertise that is required by the nodal agencies for<br />

compil<strong>in</strong>g the satellite <strong>accounts</strong>.<br />

Presently, the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Tourism compiled Tourism Satellite Accounts (TSA), with the<br />

help <strong>of</strong> NCAER for the year 2002-03. The M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health and Family Welfare compiled the


112 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

National Health Accounts, India for 2001-02. Both these <strong>in</strong>stitutions received considerable<br />

technical help from the NAD <strong>of</strong> the CSO. Also, the Institute <strong>of</strong> Social and Economic Change<br />

(ISEC) have recently compiled National Transfer Accounts us<strong>in</strong>g the data available from the<br />

<strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong>.<br />

The NAD is also presently work<strong>in</strong>g on compil<strong>in</strong>g the satellite <strong>accounts</strong> for non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> India (NPI) <strong>in</strong> the framework recommended by the United Nations, Handbook<br />

on Non-Pr<strong>of</strong>it Institutions <strong>in</strong> the System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts. The Social Statistics Division<br />

<strong>of</strong> the CSO is compil<strong>in</strong>g the Environmental Accounts.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

XXI. Advisory Committees on Indian National Accounts<br />

As noted <strong>in</strong> Section 2, a key recommendation <strong>of</strong> the National Income Committee and also<br />

that <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Simon Kuznets who reviewed comprehensively the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come estimates<br />

and related aggregates <strong>of</strong> India and presented his report <strong>in</strong> January, 1957 was to set up <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Advisory Committee compris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> established authorities for guid<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come<br />

<strong>compilation</strong>. Subsequently the <strong>compilation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>statistics</strong> <strong>in</strong> India is<br />

overseen by an Advisory Committee consist<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> acknowledged experts.<br />

First Advisory Committee 1958<br />

The first Advisory Committee on National Income was set up <strong>in</strong> February, 1958. The<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> this Committee was; Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. C. Mahalanobis, Chairman, and five members,<br />

namely, Pr<strong>of</strong>. V. K. R. V. Rao, Pr<strong>of</strong>. D. R. Gadgil, Dr. I.G. Patel, Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee and Jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

Director Incharge <strong>of</strong> National Income Unit <strong>in</strong> the CSO as Member Secretary. The functions <strong>of</strong><br />

this Advisory Committee were: (a) to advise on preparation <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come and related<br />

estimates; (b) to suggest measures for improvement <strong>of</strong> the quality <strong>of</strong> data and for the<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> further essential <strong>statistics</strong>; and (c) to recommend ways and means for promotion<br />

and coord<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> research <strong>in</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come.<br />

Advisory Committee 1959<br />

This Committee was reconstituted <strong>in</strong> March, 1959 <strong>in</strong> which Shri Anjaaria <strong>of</strong> Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Affairs replaced Dr. I. G. Patel.<br />

Advisory Committee 1961<br />

In 1961, the Advisory Committee was aga<strong>in</strong> reconstituted with the addition <strong>of</strong> an item “to<br />

<strong>in</strong>itiate programme <strong>of</strong> advanced studies and research <strong>in</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come” to the terms <strong>of</strong><br />

reference <strong>of</strong> the earlier Committee.<br />

Advisory Committee 1967<br />

The Committee was reconstituted <strong>in</strong> 1967, form<strong>in</strong>g two <strong>in</strong>dependent Advisory Committees,<br />

the first to advise the Government on statistical aspects <strong>of</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> data for <strong>national</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>come under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. R. Rao, and the second for giv<strong>in</strong>g advice on the<br />

<strong>compilation</strong> and presentation <strong>of</strong> data for the purpose <strong>of</strong> economic analysis and policy<br />

decisions and on the promotion <strong>of</strong> research and advanced studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come and


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 113<br />

allied subjects under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Dr. S.R. Sen. The Committee on Collection <strong>of</strong><br />

Data for National Income was reconstituted <strong>in</strong> 1970 under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.M.<br />

Dandekar with the members compris<strong>in</strong>g Director (CSO), representatives from Indian<br />

Statistical Institute(ISI), Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, RBI, NSSO, Directors <strong>of</strong> the Directorates<br />

<strong>of</strong> Economics & Statistics, Maharashtra and West Bengal. The other Advisory Committee<br />

on <strong>compilation</strong> and Analysis <strong>of</strong> National Accounts was reconstituted under the<br />

chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee and <strong>in</strong>cluded Director (CSO), representatives <strong>of</strong><br />

RBI, ISI, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission and M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Industrial Development and M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

F<strong>in</strong>ance as members.<br />

Two more committees/work<strong>in</strong>g groups were set up for deal<strong>in</strong>g with Inter<strong>national</strong><br />

Comparison Project and Improvement <strong>of</strong> Data Base for State <strong>in</strong>come and related aggregates.<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Advisory Committee 1986<br />

On the recommendation <strong>of</strong> National Advisory Board on Statistics (NABS), it was decided <strong>in</strong><br />

1986 that the above mentioned committees might be merged <strong>in</strong>to a s<strong>in</strong>gle Advisory Committee<br />

on National Accounts. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, the Advisory Committee was reconstituted under the<br />

chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. V.M. Dandekar with Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee, Dr. A.K. Ghosh, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.D.<br />

Tendulkar and representatives <strong>of</strong> RBI, ISI, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance,<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, CEO (NSSO) and 3 State Directors <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics with<br />

a provision <strong>of</strong> rotation every 3 years as members.<br />

Advisory Committee 1992<br />

The Advisory Committee on National Accounts Statistics was reconstituted <strong>in</strong> May, 1992<br />

under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.H. Hanumantha Rao with Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee, Shri V.V.<br />

Divatia, Dr. S.G. Tiwari, Mrs. Uma Datta Roy Choudhury, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Anita Banerjee and<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> RBI, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission,<br />

Chief Executive Officer <strong>of</strong> NSSO and four state Directors <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics as<br />

members. The terms <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>of</strong> the reconstituted Committee were (i) to advise the<br />

Government for improv<strong>in</strong>g the coverage <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>statistics</strong> to <strong>in</strong>clude sectors like<br />

large scale, small scale and cottage <strong>in</strong>dustries <strong>in</strong> private and public sectors, (ii) to address the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> estimation <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>in</strong>come by rural and urban sectors on regular basis, (iii) to<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>e the issues <strong>in</strong> the estimation <strong>of</strong> factor shares by <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> rural and urban sectors,<br />

(iv) to provide guidel<strong>in</strong>es on the estimation <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> fixed capital at the State level,<br />

(v) to provide guidel<strong>in</strong>es on technical matters relat<strong>in</strong>g to phase VI <strong>of</strong> the Inter<strong>national</strong><br />

Comparison Project (ICP) for evolv<strong>in</strong>g a suitable methodology for establish<strong>in</strong>g a system <strong>of</strong><br />

comparisons <strong>of</strong> real product and Purchas<strong>in</strong>g Power Parities (PPP) <strong>of</strong> currencies and suggest<br />

possible improvements on the methods adopted by United Nations Statistical Office (UNSO);<br />

and (vi) to advise on any other mater referred to the Committee by the Department <strong>in</strong> respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> National Accounts.<br />

Advisory Committee 1996<br />

The Advisory Committee was reconstituted <strong>in</strong> January, 1996 under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Y.K. Alagh and the members <strong>of</strong> the committee <strong>in</strong>cluded Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Mukherjee, Dr. S.G. Tiwari,


114 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

Mrs. Uma Datta Roy Choudhury, Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.D. Tendulkar, Shri R.P. Katyal, and <strong>of</strong>ficials from<br />

RBI, central and state governments. The Committee was aga<strong>in</strong> reconstituted <strong>in</strong> October 1996<br />

under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Dr. Rakesh Mohan with more or less same composition.<br />

Advisory Committee 2001<br />

In April 2001, the Advisory Committee on National Accounts was reconstituted under the<br />

chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. S.D. Tendulkar. Other members <strong>of</strong> the Committee were Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B.<br />

Battacharya, Dr. V.S. Chitre, Dr. Amitabh Kundu, Mrs. Uma Datta Roy Choudhruy, Shri R.P.<br />

Katyal, Mrs. Grace Majumdar, DG (CSO), DG&CEO (NSSO), Adviser (PPD), Plann<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Commission, Economic Adviser, Department <strong>of</strong> Economic Affairs, ESA, DES-M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture, Dr. R.B. Burman, (ED-RBI), Officer-<strong>in</strong>-charge (DEAP, RBI), Director (SPl.<br />

Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Cell, Govt. <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh), Director (DES, Maharashtra), Director<br />

(BAE&S, West Bengal), ESA(Govt. <strong>of</strong> Haryana), Director (DES, Govt. <strong>of</strong> Meghalaya) and<br />

DDG (NAD).<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Advisory Committee 2007<br />

On the recommendations <strong>of</strong> the The National Statistical Commission (NSC) <strong>in</strong> its n<strong>in</strong>th<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>g held on 26.03.2007, the Government <strong>of</strong> India reconstituted the Advisory<br />

Committee on National Accounts Statistics <strong>in</strong> May 2007 under the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong> K<br />

Sundaram, Delhi School <strong>of</strong> Economics with Pr<strong>of</strong>. B.B. Bhattacharya, S.L. Shetty, Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Ashima Goyal, Pr<strong>of</strong>. Sanghamitra Das, Shri R.P. Katyal, Shri Pratap Nara<strong>in</strong>, Shri Naresh<br />

Kumar, Director General, Central Statistical Organisation, Director General (NSSO),<br />

Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Advisor, Perspective Plann<strong>in</strong>g Division., Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, Economic<br />

Advisor, Department <strong>of</strong> Economic Affairs, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance, Pr<strong>in</strong>cipal Economic and<br />

Statistical Adviser, Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture & Cooperation, Executive Director,<br />

Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India, Mumbai, Officer-<strong>in</strong>-Charge, Department <strong>of</strong> Economic Analysis<br />

and Policy, RBI, Officer-<strong>in</strong>-Charge, Department <strong>of</strong> Statistical Analysis and Computer<br />

Services, RBI, Director <strong>of</strong> DES, Andhra Pradesh, Director <strong>of</strong> DES, Maharashtra ,<br />

Director <strong>of</strong> DES, Assam as members and Additional Director General (National Accounts<br />

Division) as Member secretary.<br />

The terms <strong>of</strong> reference <strong>of</strong> this Committee were: To review the data base and advise<br />

on data collection through sample surveys, type studies etc. for implement<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

recommendations <strong>of</strong> the 1993 System <strong>of</strong> National Accounts (SNA), to advise on the<br />

methodology for <strong>compilation</strong> and presentation <strong>of</strong> National Accounts Statistics for purposes <strong>of</strong><br />

economic analysis and policy and on promotion <strong>of</strong> research <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> National Accounts<br />

Statistics, to advise on undertak<strong>in</strong>g studies for improvement <strong>of</strong> National Accounts Statistics <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> coverage, adoption <strong>of</strong> new classifications recommended by the UN Statistics<br />

Division to capture impact <strong>of</strong> recent policies/efforts <strong>of</strong> the government and development <strong>of</strong><br />

sequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> for various <strong>in</strong>stitutional sectors;, to provide guidel<strong>in</strong>es on the<br />

presentation <strong>of</strong> methodology document on National Accounts Statistics; sources and methods<br />

as per new series, to provide guidel<strong>in</strong>es for the development <strong>of</strong> regional <strong>accounts</strong>; and to<br />

advise on any other matter referred to the Committee by the National Statistical Commission <strong>in</strong><br />

respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong>.


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 115<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

References<br />

Alagh, Y.K. and Kashyap, S.P. (1971): Structure <strong>of</strong> Gujrat’s Economy – Inter-<strong>in</strong>dustry Flows at Producer’s<br />

Prices, 1964-65. Paper presented at a Sem<strong>in</strong>ar on Quantitative Economics. Sardar Patel Institute <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic and Social Research, Ahmedabad.<br />

Arndt, H.W. (1959): F<strong>in</strong>ancial Flows <strong>of</strong> the Indian Economy 1951-52 – 1958-59, ISI Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper, 1959<br />

(mimeo).<br />

Barpujari, B.K. (1960): The <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong> India, 1951-52 to 1955-56, Papers on National Income and<br />

Allied Topics (PNIAT), Vol. I, pp 91-106.<br />

Barua, S. (1977): Inter Industry Input Coefficient Table for Assam – An Approximation 1969, North<br />

Eastern Economic Review1, 1.<br />

Bhalla, G.S. (1974): Structure <strong>of</strong> Haryana Economy: Inter Industry Flows and Patterns <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>al Demand,<br />

1969-70, Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Social Science Research sponsored project, Chandigarh (mimeo).<br />

Bhalla, G.S. (1975): Structure <strong>of</strong> the Punjab Economy : Inter Industry Flows and Patterns <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>al Demand,<br />

1969-70. Indian Council <strong>of</strong> Social Science Research sponsored project, Chandigarh (mimeo).<br />

Biswas, A.K. (1954): Input-output relationship among selected Indian <strong>in</strong>dustries. MIT, Centre <strong>of</strong><br />

Inter<strong>national</strong> Studies, India Project (mimeo).<br />

Chakravarti, A.K. (1968): Structure <strong>of</strong> Indian Economy, Statistical Publish<strong>in</strong>g Society, Calcutta.<br />

CSO (1956): Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Income.<br />

CSO (1961): National Income Statistics – Proposal for a Revised Series <strong>of</strong> National Income Estimates for<br />

1955-56 to 1959-60.<br />

CSO (1963): Report <strong>of</strong> the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Flow <strong>of</strong> Funds.<br />

CSO (1967): Brochue on Revised series <strong>of</strong> National Product for 1960-61 to 1964-65.<br />

CSO (1969): National Income Statistics: Estimates <strong>of</strong> Capital Formation <strong>in</strong> India, 1960-61 to 1965-66.<br />

CSO (1969): National Income Statistics: Estimates <strong>of</strong> Sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> India, 1960-61 to 1965-66.<br />

CSO (1972): Report <strong>of</strong> the Committee on Regional Accounts – First and F<strong>in</strong>al Report (1974 and 1976)<br />

CSO (1975): National Accounts Statistics, 1960-61 to 1972-73 – Disaggregated Tables.<br />

CSO (1978): Inter-<strong>in</strong>dustry transactions 1968-69, National Accounts Statistics 1970-71 – 1975-76.<br />

CSO (1980):National Accounts Statistics: Sources and Methods.<br />

CSO (1982): Report <strong>of</strong> the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Sav<strong>in</strong>g (K.N. Raj Committee)<br />

CSO (1984): Report <strong>of</strong> the Sub-Group on State Domestic Product and Expenditure Account<br />

CSO (1988): New series on National Accounts Statistics with 1980-81 as base year, 1980-81 to 1985-86.<br />

CSO (1988): Estimates <strong>of</strong> Capital Stock <strong>of</strong> Indian Economy, as on 31 March, 1981.<br />

CSO (1988): Report <strong>of</strong> the Technical Group for Recommend<strong>in</strong>g Methodology for Estimation <strong>of</strong> Income at<br />

District and Rural/Urban Levels.<br />

CSO (1989): National Accounts Statistics (New Series) 1950-51 to 1979-80.<br />

CSO (1989): National Accounts Statistics: Sources and Methods.<br />

CSO (1989): Input-output Transactions Tables 1978-79.<br />

CSO (1990): Input-output Transactions Tables 1983-84.<br />

CSO (1994): National Accounts Statistics: Factor Incomes, 1980-81 to 1989-90<br />

CSO (1996): Report <strong>of</strong> the Expert Group on Sav<strong>in</strong>g and Capital formation. (raja J. Chelliah Committee)<br />

CSO (1996): Methodology for Preparation <strong>of</strong> Estimates <strong>of</strong> District Domestic Product Prepared Jo<strong>in</strong>tly by<br />

Directorates <strong>of</strong> Economics and Statistics Karnataka and Uttar Pradesh<br />

CSO (1997): Input-output Transactions Tables 1989-90<br />

CSO (1999): National Accounts – Brochure on new series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong><br />

CSO (2000): Input-output Transactions Tables 1993-94..<br />

CSO (2005): Input-output Transactions Tables 1998-99.


116 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

CSO (2004): Report <strong>of</strong> the Work<strong>in</strong>g Group on Workforce Estimation for Compilation <strong>of</strong> National Accounts<br />

Statistics with Base Year 1999-2000<br />

CSO (2006): National Accounts Statistics– Brochure on new series <strong>of</strong> <strong>national</strong> <strong>accounts</strong><br />

CSO (2007): National Accounts Statistics: Sources and Methods<br />

CSO: National Accounts Statistics (annual).<br />

Dandekar, V.M. (1951): Non-market productive activity and its measurement, Bull, Inter<strong>national</strong> Stat. Inst.,<br />

33(3), pp. 69-86.<br />

Deptt. <strong>of</strong> Economic Afffairs, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance, India, Govt. <strong>of</strong> (1951): First report <strong>of</strong> the the National<br />

Income Committee.<br />

Deptt. <strong>of</strong> Economic Affairs, M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance, India, Govt <strong>of</strong> (1954): F<strong>in</strong>al report <strong>of</strong> the National<br />

Income Committee.<br />

Dhar, R. (1965): An Input-Output Table for West Bengal and Calcutta Metropolitan District. First and<br />

Second Interim Reports. Calcutta Research Studies, Occasional Reports, Institute <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istration, New York, November, 1962 (mimeo).<br />

Datta, Uma (1954): A prelim<strong>in</strong>ary study <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ter-<strong>in</strong>dustry relations <strong>in</strong> India, SPND, ISI, No.7 (mimeo).<br />

Goodw<strong>in</strong>, R.M. and Chowdhury, T.P. (1955): transactions matrices for the Indian Union, 1950-51. SPND,<br />

No. 17, (Mimeo).<br />

Ghosh, P.P. (1974): Inter-sectoral transactions <strong>in</strong> Producer’s prices <strong>in</strong> the Bihar economy, 1969-70. A.N.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ha Institute <strong>of</strong> Social Science Studies, Patna.<br />

Ghosh, A. (1951): A Note on Social Account<strong>in</strong>g Procedure for Under-developed Economies. Bull.<br />

Inter<strong>national</strong> Stat. Inst., 33 (3), pp 171-184.<br />

Gulab S<strong>in</strong>gh and A.C. Kulshreshtha (1996): National Accounts Statistics <strong>in</strong> India, The Journal <strong>of</strong> Income<br />

and Wealth, Vol. 18, No. I, January, 1996<br />

Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Op<strong>in</strong>ion (1954): The Structure <strong>of</strong> Indian Economy, Quarterly Economic Report <strong>of</strong><br />

the Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Public Op<strong>in</strong>ion, Vol.I, No.3, pp 23-32.<br />

Inter<strong>national</strong> Monetary Fund (2001): Quarterly National Accounts Manual—Concepts, Data Sources, and<br />

Compilation<br />

Inter<strong>national</strong> Monetary Fund (2004): Report on the Observance <strong>of</strong> Standards and Codes on India: http://<br />

www.imf.<strong>org</strong>/external/pubs/ft/scr/2004/cr0496.pdf<br />

Inter<strong>national</strong> Monetary Fund (April, 2004): Reports on the Observance <strong>of</strong> Standards and Codes: Data<br />

Modules http://dsbb.imf.<strong>org</strong>/Applications/web/dqrs/dqrsroscs/<br />

ISI Inter-<strong>in</strong>dustry Unit (1960): Inter-<strong>in</strong>dustry Relations <strong>in</strong> the Indian Union, 1951-52, Papers on National<br />

Income and Allied Topics, Vol.I, pp 259-27.<br />

ISI Inter-<strong>in</strong>dustry Unit (1961): Inter-<strong>in</strong>dustry Relation <strong>in</strong> Indian Union, 1955-56 (at market prices) SPND,<br />

217 (mimeo).<br />

Kolli, Ramesh (2006): Impact <strong>of</strong> SNA 1993 on India’s National Account<strong>in</strong>g System and Potential<br />

Implications <strong>of</strong> the Revised SNA, Conference <strong>of</strong> Inter<strong>national</strong> Association for Research <strong>in</strong> Income and<br />

Wealth, F<strong>in</strong>land<br />

Koti, R.K. and Santanam, K.V. (1970): An Input-Output Table for Maharashtra at Purchaser’s Prices, 1963,<br />

City and Industrial Development Corporation, Bombay.<br />

Malenbaum, W. (1955): Indian Domestic Product 1951-52 – 1953-54. Indian Economic Journal, Vol.II, No.3<br />

pp 247-253.<br />

Manne, A.S. and Rudra, A. (1965) : A Consistency Model <strong>of</strong> Indian Fourth Five Year Plan, Sankhya, Series<br />

B, Parts 1 &2, pp 51-114.<br />

Mathur, P.N. et al (1969): Input-output Flow Table (32X32) 1963 Economic Analysis <strong>in</strong> Input-output<br />

Framework Vol.II. Input-output Research Association, Poona.<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Health and Family Welfare, Government <strong>of</strong> India (2005): National Health Accounts, India<br />

M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Tourism (2006) and National Council for Applied Economic Resear: Tourism Satellite Account<br />

for India.


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 117<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

Mukherjee, M. (1954 a): the Technique <strong>of</strong> Social Account<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a Pre-<strong>in</strong>dustrial Economy, Sankhya, Vol.14,<br />

Parts 1 & 2.<br />

Mukherjee, M., (1954 b): A Scheme for Collect<strong>in</strong>g and Utilis<strong>in</strong>g Data on the Indian Accounts. Memorandum<br />

<strong>of</strong> the University Social Economic Institute, Oslo, Norway.<br />

Mukherjee, M., Uma Datta Roy Choudhury and Prasada Rao, D.S. (1975): Economic Accounts <strong>of</strong><br />

Develop<strong>in</strong>g Countries. Review <strong>of</strong> Income and Wealth, Series 21, Vol.4.<br />

Mukherjee, M. (1969): National Income <strong>of</strong> India: Trends and structure. Statistical Publish<strong>in</strong>g Society,<br />

Calcutta.<br />

Mukherjee, M. and Uma Datta Roy Choudhury (1984): National Accounts Information System, Macmillan<br />

India Ltd., New Delhi.<br />

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2001): Quarterly National Accounts: Sources<br />

And Methods Used By OECD Member Countries<br />

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (2006): Understand<strong>in</strong>g National Accounts<br />

Panchamukhi, V.R. (1980): Input-Output Study <strong>of</strong> Karnataka State, 1977-78, Plann<strong>in</strong>g Department, Govt.<br />

<strong>of</strong> Karnataka, Bangalore.<br />

Plann<strong>in</strong>g Commission, India, Govt. <strong>of</strong> Economic Division (1967): An <strong>in</strong>put-output table <strong>of</strong> the Indian<br />

Economy for 1959. Economic Analysis <strong>in</strong> Input-Output Framework, Vol. I, Input-Output Research<br />

Association, Poona.<br />

Perspective Plann<strong>in</strong>g Division, Uttar Pradesh (1975): Structure <strong>of</strong> the Economy <strong>of</strong> Uttar Pradesh, 1970-71.<br />

State Plann<strong>in</strong>g Institute, Lucknow.<br />

Prakash, S. and Patanker, P.K. (1978): Inter-Industry Structure <strong>of</strong> the Economy <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, 1965.<br />

Paper presented at the Sixth Input-Output Conference, Bombay.<br />

Ramana, D.V. (1961): National Accounts and <strong>in</strong>put-output <strong>accounts</strong> <strong>of</strong> India, Deptt. Of Applied economics,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge, U. K. (mimeo).<br />

RBI (2000): Flow <strong>of</strong> Funds Accounts <strong>of</strong> the Indian Economy: 1951-52 to 1995-96<br />

Rao, C.R. (1972): Data Base <strong>of</strong> Indian Economy, Review and Reappraisal. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> a Sem<strong>in</strong>ar<br />

Organised by Indian Econometric Society, May 19-21, 1972. Edited by Pr<strong>of</strong>. C.R. Rao, Vol. I.<br />

Stone, J.R.N. (1951): Memorandum on the forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>accounts</strong>. NIU work<strong>in</strong>g paper No. 60 (mimeo).<br />

United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (1961): Formulat<strong>in</strong>g Development<br />

Programmes, Development Techniques, Series No.2.<br />

United Nations (1968): A system <strong>of</strong> National Accounts – Studies <strong>in</strong> methods, series F, No. 2, Rev. 3.<br />

United Nations, Commission <strong>of</strong> the European Communities, IMF, OECD, and World Bank (1993): System<br />

<strong>of</strong> National Accounts 1993.<br />

Venkataramaiah, P., Kulkarni, A.R. and Argade, L. (1970): Regional Input Output Matrices, India, 1965,<br />

Arth Vijnana, 21, No. 3-4 pp. 273-670.


118 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

Annex-I<br />

Statement: Po<strong>in</strong>t Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Income For The Second Half <strong>of</strong><br />

The 19 th Century and First Half <strong>of</strong> The 20 th Century<br />

S.No Author Title or Source Area Year <strong>of</strong> NationalPer Capita Income<br />

covered reference Income<br />

(Rs.Crores) (<strong>in</strong> Rs.)<br />

Current 1948-49<br />

prices prices<br />

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

1. Dadabhai Poverty and un-British British India 1867-68 340 20 112<br />

Naoroji Rule <strong>in</strong> 1871<br />

2. Atk<strong>in</strong>son. A Statistical Review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

F.J Income and Wealth <strong>of</strong> British British India 1875 574 30.5 175<br />

India. JRSS, June 1902<br />

3. Major Bar<strong>in</strong>g Budget Speech 1882 British India 1881 525 27 153<br />

4. Richard.T. A paper read before the Institute<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bankers, London, July 1881 British India 1881 22310 (not verified)<br />

5. Horne .E.A An estimate <strong>of</strong> India’s National<br />

Income, Bengal Eco. Journal<br />

January, 1918 British India 1891 - 28 146<br />

6. Atk<strong>in</strong>son.F.J A Statistical Review <strong>of</strong> the British India 1895 877 39.5 191<br />

Income and Wealth <strong>of</strong> British<br />

India, JRSS, June 1902<br />

7. Digby, W. ‘Prosperous’ British India British India 1898-99 428 18.9 90<br />

8. Lord Curzon Budget Speech, 1901 British India 1901 675 30 147<br />

9. Giffen.R. Economic Enquiries and India 1903 900 30 139<br />

Studies, Vol.II. 1903<br />

10. Horne. E.A An Estimate <strong>of</strong> India’s National British India 1911 980 42 178<br />

Income, Bengal Economic<br />

Journal, Jan.1918<br />

11. Shirras. G.F. Report on the Enquiry <strong>in</strong>to British India 1911 1920 80 339<br />

Work<strong>in</strong>g Class Budget <strong>in</strong><br />

Bombay.1923<br />

12. Balakrishna.R. Industrial Decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> India, 1917 India 1911-12 539 21 89<br />

13. Vakil C.N & Currency and F<strong>in</strong>ance <strong>in</strong> India 1911-14 1774 58.5 231<br />

Muranjan.S.K India, 1926<br />

14. Wadia P.A & The Wealth <strong>of</strong> India, 1925 British India 1913-14 1087 44.5 171<br />

Joshi. G.N<br />

15. Lupton. A Happy India, 1922 British India 1919-20 2854.9 114 217<br />

16. Slater. G. The Madras Year Book, 1923 Madras 1919-20 _ 112 213<br />

17. Sarma B.N. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the Council British India 1921 _ Over 100 208<br />

<strong>of</strong> State, 1921<br />

18. Shah, K.T. & Wealth and Taxable Capacity India 1921-22 2364 74 154<br />

Khambata, K.J <strong>in</strong> India, 1924<br />

19. Shirras, G.F Poverty and K<strong>in</strong>dred Economic British India 1921-22 2866 116 242<br />

Problems <strong>in</strong> India, 1935<br />

20. Shah, K.T Trade Tariffs and Transport British India 1921-22 1470 46 96<br />

<strong>in</strong> India, 1924<br />

21. Tiwari S.G. Economic Prosperity <strong>of</strong> U.P 1921-22 – 107 223<br />

United Prov<strong>in</strong>ces, 1951<br />

22. Roa, VKRV An Essay on India’s British India 1925-29 2068 80 202<br />

National Income, 1940<br />

23. Shirras, G.F Poverty and K<strong>in</strong>dred Eco. British India 1926-27 2824 115 290<br />

Problems <strong>in</strong> India, 1935<br />

24. Govt. <strong>of</strong> India Central Bank<strong>in</strong>g Enquiry Agricultural 1928 – 42 108<br />

Committee Report 1931 Population only<br />

25. Govt. <strong>of</strong> India Simon Commission Report, India 1929 – 116 307<br />

1929


COMPILATION OF NATIONAL ACCOUNTS STATISTICS IN INDIA 119<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

26. Shirras, G.F Quoted by Davis: Population <strong>of</strong> British India 1931 – 63 245<br />

India and Pakistan, 1951<br />

27. Roa, VKRV The National Income <strong>of</strong> the British India 1931-32 1689 62 241<br />

British India, 1940<br />

28. Desai R.C. The Standard <strong>of</strong> Liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> India India 1931-32 2809 72 280<br />

and Pakistan, 1953<br />

29. Tiwari S.G. Economic Prosperity <strong>of</strong> U.P 1931-32 – 50.5 196<br />

United Prov<strong>in</strong>ces, 1951<br />

30. Grigg. J. Quoted by Davis: Population British India 1937-38 – 56.1 205<br />

<strong>of</strong> India and Pakistan, 1951<br />

31. Natarajan B. An Essay on National Income Union Prov. 1938-39 1482 68.5 269<br />

and Expenditure <strong>in</strong> India, 1949<br />

32. Tiwari S.G. Economic Prosperity <strong>of</strong> U.P 1938-39 – 56.1 220<br />

United Prov<strong>in</strong>ces, 1951<br />

33. ‘Student’ Commerce, December, 1943 British India 1938-39 1865 65 255<br />

34. The Eastern Economist Union Prov. 1939-40 1924 67 231<br />

Vol. IX. No. 21, 1948<br />

35. Roa, VKRV Commerce, February, 1944 British India 1942-43 3423 114 263<br />

36. ‘Student’ Commerce, December, 1943 British India 1942-43 4265 142 327<br />

37. Adarkar B.P & M imeographed : India 1944-45 5060 171 260<br />

Tandon, H.K M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance, undated<br />

38. M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Commerce, 1949 Union Prov. 1945-46 4931 204 307<br />

39. Saxena D.N Ph.D Thesis, University <strong>of</strong> British India 1945-46 5430 224 337<br />

London,1950<br />

40. M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Commerce, 1950 Union Prov. 1946-47 5580 228 314<br />

41. Commerce, Annual Review Indian Union 1947-48 4974 213 263<br />

No. 1948<br />

42. M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Commerce Indian Union 1948-49 8950 277 277<br />

43. Govt. <strong>of</strong> India First Report <strong>of</strong> the National Indian Union 1948-49 8710 255 255<br />

Income Committee, 1951<br />

44. Govt. <strong>of</strong> India F<strong>in</strong>al Report <strong>of</strong> the National Indian Union 1948-49 8650 250 250<br />

Income Committee, 1954<br />

Annex-II<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Statistical Series <strong>of</strong> Estimates <strong>of</strong> National Income and Related Aggregates Available <strong>in</strong><br />

National Accounts Statistics (Nas) <strong>in</strong> The New Series With Base 1980-81<br />

S.No. Series Period Issue NAS Reference<br />

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)<br />

1 National Income 1950-51 to 1979-80 Disaggregated Statement 4&5<br />

i) Gross and Net Domestic Product by Economic Statement<br />

Activity at Factor cost at current prices and 1992 1991-95<br />

1980-81 prices 1980-81 to 1991-92 Statements 10& 12<br />

ii) Value <strong>of</strong> Output, <strong>in</strong>put and value added by 1950-51 to 1959-60 Disaggregated Part II<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry disaggregated statement<br />

Statement<br />

a) at 1980-81 prices 1960-61 to 1979-80 Disaggregated Part III<br />

Statement 1992<br />

– do –<br />

b) at current prices and 1980-81 prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Part V<br />

iii) Domestic Product by Economic Activity<br />

<strong>in</strong> Public Sector<br />

a) Gross: at current prices 1960-61 to 1979-80 1989 (Back Series) Statements 14& 15<br />

and 1980-81 prices 1950-51 to 1979-80<br />

b) Net : at current prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statement 27<br />

and1980-81 prices 1960-61 to 1979-80 1989(Back Series) Statements 16& 17<br />

1950-51 to 1979-80 1989(back Series) Statement 28<br />

1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995


120 THE JOURNAL OF INCOME AND WEALTH<br />

www.IndianJournals.com<br />

Members Copy, Not for Commercial Sale<br />

Downloaded From IP - 115.248.73.67 on dated 29-Nov-2010<br />

1.2 Net Domestic Product by Economic Activity 1970-71 and 1995 Statement S-3<br />

<strong>in</strong> Rural and Urban Areas at current prices 1980-81<br />

1.3 Factor Incomes at current prices 1980-81 to 1989-90 1994 & 1995 Statements 1 to 12<br />

1988-89 to 1992-93 Statement 76<br />

1.4 National Disposable <strong>in</strong>come and Personal<br />

Disposable Income at current prices. 1950-51 to 1979-80 Disaggregated Statement 3<br />

1980-81 to 1992-93 Statements Statement 4<br />

19921991 to 1995<br />

2. F<strong>in</strong>al Consumption Expenditure<br />

a) Private F<strong>in</strong>al Consumption 1960-61 to 1979-80 1989(Back Series) Statements 7 & 8<br />

Expenditure <strong>in</strong> Domestic Market at 1950-51 to 1979-80 1989(Back Series)<br />

Current prices and 1980-81 prices 1991 to 1995 Statement 14<br />

b) F<strong>in</strong>al Consumption Expenditure <strong>of</strong> 1980-81 to 1992-93 1989(Back Series) Statements 22 & 23<br />

Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Department by 1960-61 to 1979-80 1989(Back Series)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> Authority at current 1950-51 to 1979-80 1991to 1995 Statement 29<br />

and 1980-81 prices 1980-81 to 1992-93<br />

3. Domestic Sav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a) Domestic Sav<strong>in</strong>g by Type <strong>of</strong> 1950-51 to 1979-80 1989(Back Series) Statement 9<br />

Institution at current prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statement 18<br />

b) Domestic Sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Public Sector 1950-51 to 1979-80 1989(Back Series) Statement 9<br />

at current prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statement 30<br />

4. Domestic Capital Formation<br />

4.1 By Type <strong>of</strong> Assets and by Type <strong>of</strong> Institution<br />

a) at current prices 1950-51 to 1979-80 1989 (Back Series) Statement 10<br />

1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statement 19<br />

b) at 1980-81 prices 1950-51 to 1979-80 1989 (Back Series) Statement 11<br />

(by type <strong>of</strong> asset only) 1991 to 1995 Statement 19<br />

1980-81 to 1992-93<br />

4.2 By Industry <strong>of</strong> use at current prices 1950-51 to 1979-80 1989 (Back Series) Statements 12 & 13<br />

and 1980-81 prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statement 20<br />

4.3 Gross and Net Domestic Capital Formation<br />

<strong>in</strong> Public Sector<br />

a) By <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>of</strong> use at current prices 1960-61 to 1979-80 1989 (Back Series) Statements 8 to 12<br />

and 1980-81 prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statements 31 & 32<br />

b) By type <strong>of</strong> assets at current prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statement 33<br />

5. Net fixed Capital Stock by Industry <strong>of</strong> Use<br />

a) at current prices 1981 to 1993 1991 to 1995 Statement 22<br />

b) at 1980-81 prices 1951 to 1980 1990 Statement S-2<br />

1981 to 1993 1991 to 1995<br />

1981 to 1993 1991 to 1995 Statement 22<br />

6. Depreciation as provided <strong>in</strong> the books <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>accounts</strong> at current prices 1980-81 to 1992-93 1991 to 1995 Statement S-2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!