Dr. rer. nat. - Leibniz Universität Hannover
Dr. rer. nat. - Leibniz Universität Hannover
Dr. rer. nat. - Leibniz Universität Hannover
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Doctorate Regulations of the Faculty of Natural Sciences, the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, and the<br />
Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science<br />
Sec. 11<br />
Assessment of Oral Exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or Thesis Defence<br />
and Overall Assessment of Graduation Performances<br />
(1) Directly after the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or the thesis defence, the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion board will ascertain in a<br />
non-public session if and with which result the doctoral candidate has passed the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or<br />
the thesis defence, which grade will be allocated to the doctoral thesis, and the overall assessment awarded to<br />
the graduation performances. In case according to Sec. 8 Para. 8 a grade for the doctoral thesis is already<br />
available, such grade has to be adopted. Prior to that, the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion board may turn for advice to the<br />
professors having attended the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or the thesis defence.<br />
Each assessment awarded by one of the examiners involved is of equal weight. For decision making, in case<br />
of an oral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion the impression received from the short presentation will also have to be taken into<br />
account. For the thesis defence assessment, the presentation quality and the topical reference of questions<br />
asked have to be taken into consideration as well. Each assessment has to be expressed in grades as per<br />
Sec. 8 Para. 2, or the respective exami<strong>nat</strong>ion has to be assessed failed. In fixing the grade of the doctoral<br />
thesis, each assessment awarded by one of the supervisors involved is of equal weight.<br />
When determining the overall assessment awarded to the graduation performances, the assessment of the<br />
doctoral thesis is of a weight of 2/3. Depending on the overall impression gained from the respective<br />
exami<strong>nat</strong>ion performances, the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion board may, as additional assessment decision, round up or down<br />
the result of each calculation of average between two full grades to the nearest full grades as per Sec. 8 Para.<br />
2. The overall assessment of excellent may only be allocated when the doctoral thesis and the oral<br />
exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or thesis defence, respectively, have each been assessed as excellent.<br />
(2) If a doctoral candidate fails to appear at the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or discontinues the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion, the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion<br />
is deemed failed, unless adequate grounds are provided. In case adequate grounds have been delivered, the<br />
dean will fix a new exami<strong>nat</strong>ion date, taking into consideration Sec. 9 Para. 1 or Sec. 10 Para. 1, respectively.<br />
(3) Short minutes have to be taken of the oral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or the thesis defence, as the case may be. Besides<br />
indications as to place, date, time of beginning and termi<strong>nat</strong>ion of the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion, the minutes will contain the<br />
names of the doctoral candidate, the examiners, and, in case of the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion, names of<br />
further attendees<br />
the title of the doctoral thesis<br />
the ascertainment that the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion has been passed<br />
the grade of the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or the thesis defence,<br />
the grade of the doctoral thesis,<br />
the overall grade of the graduation performances.<br />
The minutes have to be signed by the chairperson of the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion board.<br />
(4) The chairperson of the exami<strong>nat</strong>ion board will inform the doctoral candidate without delay of the results<br />
specified in Sec. 11 Para. 3 and will make out to her or him a preliminary certification of the graduation result.<br />
(5) In case the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or thesis defence is deemed failed, the doctoral candidate may<br />
repeat the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or thesis defence once after three months at the earliest and after twelve<br />
months at the latest.<br />
(6) The doctoral procedure is termi<strong>nat</strong>ed when the doctoral candidate has not applied for a repetition within<br />
one year after having failed the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or thesis defence or when the doctoral procedure<br />
has definitively been failed. The dean of the responsible faculty will inform the doctoral candidate in writing of<br />
the termi<strong>nat</strong>ion of the procedure, including grounds and an advice on legal remedies.<br />
(7) The exami<strong>nat</strong>ion board may impose conditions on the doctoral candidate as to the final version of the<br />
doctoral thesis to be published. The determi<strong>nat</strong>ion of such conditions has to be specified in the minutes of the<br />
exami<strong>nat</strong>ion. Fulfilment of the conditions will be checked and certified by the board chairperson according to<br />
Sec. 7 Para. 5.<br />
Sec. 12<br />
Duplication of Doctoral Thesis<br />
(1) Within six months of passing the oral doctoral exami<strong>nat</strong>ion or thesis defence, the doctoral candidate has to<br />
publish the approved final version of the doctoral thesis. The regulations for publication and delivery of the<br />
doctoral thesis as well as the number of copies to be delivered will be determined by the responsible faculty in<br />
compliance with the general guidelines decided upon by the Se<strong>nat</strong>e of <strong>Leibniz</strong> Universität <strong>Hannover</strong>.