26.10.2014 Views

Paper - Academic Registry and Council Secretariat - Queen Mary ...

Paper - Academic Registry and Council Secretariat - Queen Mary ...

Paper - Academic Registry and Council Secretariat - Queen Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board<br />

Minutes of the meeting of the Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board held on<br />

Wednesday 23 February 2011 at 13.00<br />

UNCONFIRMED<br />

Present:<br />

Prof. Susan Dilly (Chair)<br />

Peter Rosenberg Dr. Mark Carroll Dr. Henri Huijberts<br />

Prof. Olwyn Westwood Vraj Domalip Prof. Warren Boutcher<br />

Dr. Andy Robinson Prof. Omar Garcia-Obregon Prof. Peter McOwan<br />

Prof. Ray Croucher<br />

Prof. Elizabeth Davenport<br />

In attendance:<br />

Ken Chow (Secretary) Jane Pallant Dr. Roger Nix<br />

Prof. Joy Hinson (on behalf of Dr. Ali Zarbakhsh<br />

Prof. F Breedon<br />

Prof. Anthony Warrens)<br />

Raluca Vasiliu-McIver Prof. Peter Heathcote Dr. Chris Reid<br />

Dr. Alastair Owens Prof. Ray Kiely Eugene Doyen<br />

Maria Espas<strong>and</strong>in Dr. Michael Seed Dr. Leon Vinokur<br />

Simon Pate<br />

Apologies:<br />

Prof. Anthony Warrens Dr. Julia Shelton Angie Raymond<br />

Dr. Sam Brenton Prof. Andrew Le Sueur Dr.Theo Kreouzis<br />

Dr. Stuart Perrin<br />

Part 1 – Preliminary Items<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

2. Minutes of the previous meeting PMAB2010-048<br />

2010:042 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> confirmed the minutes of the<br />

previous meeting held on Wednesday 24 th November 2010.<br />

3. Matters Arising from the previous meeting PMAB2010-049<br />

2010:043 The Board received a paper on the matters arising from the minutes of the previous<br />

meetings of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board. The Board noted that there<br />

were a number of outst<strong>and</strong>ing actions still to be addressed both from the October<br />

<strong>and</strong> November PMAB meetings.<br />

Action: CCLS / EECS<br />

Part 2 – For Information<br />

<strong>Paper</strong>


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

4. External LLM 2011 Regulations (Chair’s Action) n/a<br />

2010:044 The Board noted that a number of minor amendments to the External LLM<br />

Regulations had been approved by Chair’s Action outside of the meeting.<br />

5. Brief report on the Articulation Agreement Sub-Board<br />

meeting held on 13 October 2010<br />

PMAB2010-050<br />

2010:045 The Board noted a report from the Articulation Agreement Sub-Board.<br />

6. MSc Finance (Part 1) Chair’s Action n/a<br />

2010:046 The Board received confirmation that a Part 1 Programme Proposal for the MSc<br />

Finance had been approved by Chair’s Action <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The MSc Finance proposal had been considered outside of the normal<br />

timescale: the School had been keen to offer the MSc in Finance for some<br />

time <strong>and</strong> was now in a position to do so. The consideration of the Part 1 in<br />

advance of the meeting allowed for proper scrutiny without unduly delaying<br />

the advertising of this new programme.’<br />

ii. The Part 1 Proposal had been circulated to Board members for comments<br />

<strong>and</strong> these had been addressed in the version presented to the Board.<br />

Part 3 – Programme Proposals (H&SS)<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

Faculty of Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences<br />

7. School of Business Management<br />

MSc International Business <strong>and</strong> Politics (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 3 associated<br />

module proposals:<br />

PMAB2010-052<br />

The Politics of International Business<br />

Political Economy: Theory <strong>and</strong> History<br />

MSc International Business <strong>and</strong> Politics Dissertation<br />

2010:047 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated module<br />

proposals for the MSc International Business <strong>and</strong> Politics <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The proposed programme used expertise within the School of Politics <strong>and</strong><br />

International Relations <strong>and</strong> School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />

ii. There was a clear student dem<strong>and</strong> for the programme, particularly<br />

internationally.<br />

iii. The School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management supported the proposal.<br />

iv. The module ‘The Americas in Comparative Perspective 1: Historical Roots’<br />

would now not be offered as an elective module on the programme. This<br />

change would necessitate a revision to the Part 2 Form <strong>and</strong> Programme<br />

Specification so that the module was removed.


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

v. Given that two Schools would be involved in the delivery of the programme,<br />

the Board questioned how the programme would be managed <strong>and</strong> sought<br />

further details regarding the specified 'co-convenorship model’ to be used.<br />

vi. As the leading school, the School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management would take<br />

ultimately responsibility for the management <strong>and</strong> quality assurance of the<br />

programme.<br />

vii. Both schools were in the process of agreeing a formal administration model<br />

for the programme, which would detail the responsibilities of each school.<br />

The Board commended this as an exemplar of good practice.<br />

viii. The Board suggested that the final agreed administration model could be<br />

disseminated to other colleagues who were involved in jointly delivered<br />

programmes.<br />

ix. The funding for the dissertation module was discussed, as there were some<br />

concerns with regards to how funding would be administered. Following<br />

clarification, it was confirmed that funding would be split equally between the<br />

two schools.<br />

x. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />

module proposals subject to the clarification of the points detailed above <strong>and</strong><br />

the submission of a revised Part 2 Programme Proposal form. The revised<br />

documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />

Action: SBM / Chair<br />

8. School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

MSc Finance (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module proposal<br />

(Investments)<br />

PMAB2010-053<br />

2010:048 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> an associated module<br />

proposal for the MSc Finance <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The MSc Finance would only be offered on a full-time basis.<br />

ii. There was dem<strong>and</strong> from students who wanted to study a pure finance MSc.<br />

iii. The comments provided by the external advisor were not sufficiently detailed<br />

<strong>and</strong> required revision. A detailed appraisal of the proposal by an external<br />

advisor should be carried out using information obtained in the External<br />

Advisor Guidelines.<br />

iv. The programme’s learning outcomes needed to be revisited, as some did<br />

not correspond with the suggested headings of knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing, intellectual skills, transferable skills, <strong>and</strong> practical skills.<br />

v. According to the programme structure five modules were listed as core<br />

modules but following discussion it was suggested that they should be listed<br />

as compulsory with the dissertation listed as a core module. The designation<br />

of module status would comply with the practice adopted elsewhere within<br />

the School.<br />

vi. The learning outcomes for the Investments module required further work<br />

<strong>and</strong> more detail in order to fully reflect that the module was at level 7.<br />

Specifically, a number of outcomes, such as ‘to work in teams’ <strong>and</strong> ‘to work


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

to deadlines’ were deemed not sufficiently detailed by Board members.<br />

vii. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />

module proposal subject to the clarification of the points detailed above <strong>and</strong><br />

the submission of a revised Part 2 Programme Proposal form <strong>and</strong> revised<br />

Module Proposal form. The revised documentation would be considered<br />

outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />

Action: SEF<br />

9. School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />

MA English Studies (Part 1)<br />

PMAB2010-054<br />

2010:049 The Board considered a Part 1 programme proposal for the MA English Studies<br />

<strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The proposed programme would restructure the existing MA provision in<br />

English, <strong>and</strong> create opportunities to develop teaching in areas that were<br />

currently under represented in the postgraduate taught curriculum.<br />

ii. The aim of the MA English Studies was to enhance student learning by<br />

increasing module choice <strong>and</strong> to improve the student experience by making<br />

the academic management of the MA more effective.<br />

iii. The MA English Studies would function as an umbrella programme with a<br />

single point of entry but with several distinct pathways.<br />

iv. Further information would be needed with regard to the precise programme<br />

<strong>and</strong> pathway structures. It was agreed that this issue would be discussed<br />

outside of the meeting.<br />

Action: CR / AR<br />

v. The programme had the full endorsement of the Dean for Taught<br />

Programmes (Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences) <strong>and</strong> had successfully been<br />

approved through the Planning <strong>and</strong> Accountability Review process.<br />

vi. The Board approved the Part 1 programme proposal.<br />

10. School of Geography<br />

MSci Environmental Science (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 2 associated module<br />

proposals:<br />

PMAB2010-055<br />

Advanced Research <strong>and</strong> Practice in Environmental Science<br />

Independent Research Project<br />

2010:050 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated module<br />

proposals for the MSci Environmental Science <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. There was evidence of dem<strong>and</strong> from overseas students for the proposed<br />

programme.<br />

ii. Student performance would dictate progression onto the MSci.<br />

iii. Students who did not want to pursue the MSci award would potentially have<br />

the option to achieve a classified degree so long as they met the credit


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

requirements for the st<strong>and</strong>ard BSc degree.<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

iv. Undergraduate versions of the specified postgraduate modules had been<br />

created for the programme <strong>and</strong> would be utilised due to the differing pass<br />

marks for undergraduate (40%) <strong>and</strong> postgraduate modules (50%).<br />

v. The proposal was in line with current practice <strong>and</strong> other MSci programmes<br />

that operated within <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>.<br />

vi. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />

module proposals.<br />

11. School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

i. MA Documentary Practice (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module<br />

proposal (Documentary Production Project)<br />

PMAB2010-056<br />

2010:051 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module<br />

proposal for the MA Documentary Practice <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The necessary resources <strong>and</strong> facilities were available to support the<br />

programme.<br />

ii. The programme would share the core course component with the MA Film<br />

Studies, as well as make use of some specialist modules.<br />

iii. The Board commended the st<strong>and</strong>ard of documentation received <strong>and</strong><br />

reported that the MA Documentary Practice was a well-developed proposal.<br />

iv. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />

module proposal.<br />

ii. BA History <strong>and</strong> German (Part 2)<br />

PMAB2010-057<br />

2010:052 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal for the BA History <strong>and</strong><br />

German <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The programme would be offered full-time over 3 academic years, <strong>and</strong> over<br />

4 academic years where students opted to incorporate a year’s study<br />

abroad.<br />

ii. All of the modules detailed in the documentation were approved modules,<br />

although some were missing module codes.<br />

iii. Further information would be needed with regard to the precise programme<br />

structure. It was agreed that this matter would be discussed outside of the<br />

meeting.<br />

Action: SLLF / AR<br />

iv. The final award title required clarification, as there was some discussion<br />

over whether the title was ‘History <strong>and</strong> German’ or ‘German <strong>and</strong> History’.<br />

Action: SLLF<br />

v. The programme would be managed in the same way other internal<br />

collaborations between the two schools are managed. The responsibilities of<br />

each respective school were also detailed in a written agreement.


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

vi. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal.<br />

School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

12. Blizard Institute of Cell <strong>and</strong> Molecular Science<br />

PgCert Applied Practical Research for Nurses <strong>and</strong> Allied Health<br />

Professionals (Part 1)<br />

PMAB2010-058<br />

2010:053 The Board considered a Part 1 programme proposal for the PgCert Applied<br />

Practical Research for Nurses <strong>and</strong> Allied Health Professionals <strong>and</strong> noted the<br />

following:<br />

i. The proposed fee for overseas students required further clarification <strong>and</strong><br />

discussion within the School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry. Costing <strong>and</strong> Pricing<br />

Group would also have to be consulted <strong>and</strong> approve the proposed fee.<br />

Action: ME<br />

ii. The programme had principally been devised because there were currently<br />

no formal <strong>and</strong> accredited courses which research nurses <strong>and</strong> other allied<br />

health professionals could undertake to enhance their career pathway. This<br />

was also the case for clinical industry research associates.<br />

iii. There was a clear academic rationale for the development of the<br />

programme, which the Board commended.<br />

iv. The 4 modules for the PgCert were confirmed as compulsory <strong>and</strong> not<br />

elective modules as originally specified. This required addressing in the Part<br />

1 form.<br />

v. Given the nature of the programme, the Board questioned whether there<br />

was scope for applying for professional accreditation. It was expressed that<br />

preliminary discussions with relevant professional bodies had taken place<br />

<strong>and</strong> that, where possible, professional accreditation would be sought.<br />

vi. The Board approved the Part 1 programme proposal subject to the<br />

clarification of the proposed fees for overseas students. The fee must also<br />

be formally approved before the programme can be advertised.<br />

Action: ME<br />

13. William Harvey Research Institute<br />

MSc, PgDip <strong>and</strong> PgCert Musculoskeletal Sciences (Part 1)<br />

PMAB2010-059<br />

2010:054 The Board considered a Part 1 programme proposal for the MSc, PgDip <strong>and</strong><br />

PgCert Musculoskeletal Sciences <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The MSc in Musculoskeletal Clinical Science would provide a one year<br />

programme leading to a higher degree with options for clinicians, scientists<br />

<strong>and</strong> allied health professional who wished to specialize in musculoskeletal<br />

medicine, rheumatology, <strong>and</strong> sciences. The programme would also enable<br />

students to do a clinical rotation <strong>and</strong> this was quite a unique development<br />

within the UK.<br />

ii. The specified non-st<strong>and</strong>ard fees had been approved by the Costing <strong>and</strong>


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

Pricing Group <strong>and</strong> a detailed business case had been submitted to support<br />

the proposal.<br />

iii. The proposed structure was similar to that of the existing MSc Sports <strong>and</strong><br />

Exercise Medicine.<br />

iv. The part-time mode of study would be offered over 2 years.<br />

v. The programme was structured around two distinct pathways; a Clinical<br />

Pathway <strong>and</strong> a Scientific Pathway. However, students would receive the<br />

same award title regardless of which pathway they elected to take.<br />

vi. The rationale for not differentiating between the two streams by titles was<br />

debated by the Board <strong>and</strong> it was suggested that the option for dedicated<br />

titles should be revisited. Any change in titles would be addressed in a<br />

revised Part 1 from.<br />

Action: MS<br />

vii. Given that the programme aimed to recruit overseas students, the need for<br />

student clinicians to be registered with the General Medical <strong>Council</strong> (GMC)<br />

was raised. It was understood that overseas students would not be<br />

disadvantaged compared with home students due to this restriction. This<br />

practice also operated on the existing MSc Sports <strong>and</strong> Exercise Medicine,<br />

which attracted a number of overseas students.<br />

viii. The use of variable mode of study <strong>and</strong> option to complete the programme in<br />

4 years was discussed since this was the practice adopted for the MSc<br />

Sports <strong>and</strong> Exercise Medicine. This issue would be discussed <strong>and</strong> confirmed<br />

outside of the meeting.<br />

Action: MS / AR<br />

ix. The Board approved the Part 1 programme proposal subject to the<br />

clarification of the points detailed above <strong>and</strong>, if necessary, the submission of<br />

revised Part 1 from.<br />

Part 4 – Programme Amendments<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

Faculty of Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences<br />

14. School of Business Management<br />

i. MSc International Human Resource Management <strong>and</strong><br />

Employment Relations (N1S3)<br />

PMAB2010-060<br />

2010:055 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

MSc International Human Resource Management <strong>and</strong> Employment Relations.<br />

ii. MSc Global Business (N1Q3)<br />

PMAB2010-061<br />

2010:056 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

MSc Global Business.<br />

15. School of Geography


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

i. MSc Integrated Management of Freshwater Environments (F7S1,<br />

F7S2)<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

PMAB2010-062<br />

2010:057 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the MSc Integrated<br />

Management of Freshwater Environments <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The programme amendment related to a change in programme title to ‘MSc<br />

Environmental Science: Integrated Management of Freshwater<br />

Environments’.<br />

ii. The Board approved the programme amendment to the MSc Integrated<br />

Management of Freshwater Environments.<br />

ii. BSc (Econ) Geography with Business Management (F8N1)<br />

PMAB2010-063<br />

2010:058 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BSc (Econ)<br />

Geography with Business Management <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The programme amendment related to a change in award qualification from<br />

BSc (Econ) to BSc, which was proposed to apply from September 2012.<br />

ii. The current BSc (Econ) qualification was an anomaly among the combined<br />

'with Business Management' programmes offered by <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>. These<br />

programmes resulted in the award of a BA or BSc.<br />

iii. The amendment also detailed a proposal to create a dedicated pathway for<br />

students interested in studying physical geography.<br />

iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc (Econ)<br />

Geography with Business Management.<br />

16. School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

BA Year Abroad/placement programmes<br />

PMAB2010-064<br />

2010:059 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BA Year<br />

Abroad/placement programmes <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The increase in the value of the Year Abroad Assessment modules would<br />

not affect a students' degree classification, as the mean for the Year Abroad<br />

Assessment module would be unchanged (the School currently uses the L3<br />

mean of 1:2:2:4 for 4-year degree programmes).<br />

ii. The Board questioned whether this proposal effectively condoned failure for<br />

a year but it was confirmed that this was not the case.<br />

iii. A change to the award rules for BA Year Abroad/placement programmes<br />

would be necessary.<br />

iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BA Year<br />

Abroad/placement programmes.<br />

17. Centre for Commercial Law Studies<br />

MSc Law <strong>and</strong> Finance (M3S7, M3S8)<br />

PMAB2010-065


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

2010:060 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the MSc Law <strong>and</strong><br />

Finance <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The amendment related to a slight change in programme structure <strong>and</strong> the<br />

modules offered to students.<br />

ii. Within the specialisations, the status of modules should be listed as<br />

compulsory <strong>and</strong> not core. This required a change to the Programme<br />

Amendment Form <strong>and</strong> Programme Specification that were submitted.<br />

iii. The module proposal for ‘Financial Derivatives in a Legal Context’ was<br />

missing from the paperwork <strong>and</strong> could therefore not be approved. It was<br />

expressed that this module would be submitted at the next meeting of<br />

PMAB.<br />

iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the MSc Law <strong>and</strong><br />

Finance, subject to the revision <strong>and</strong> resubmission of the Programme<br />

Amendment Form <strong>and</strong> Programme Specification. The revised<br />

documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />

Action: CCLS / Chair<br />

Faculty of Science <strong>and</strong> Engineering<br />

18. School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />

i. BSc Biology with Psychology (C1C8) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module<br />

proposal (Advanced Aquatic Biology)<br />

PMAB2010-066<br />

2010:061 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BSc Biology with<br />

Psychology <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module proposal <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme,<br />

including changes to the modules offered <strong>and</strong> the status of modules.<br />

ii. The module proposal for Advanced Aquatic Biology would be resubmitted to<br />

the next meeting of PMAB for consideration <strong>and</strong> approval. This was because<br />

the content of the module required further refinement in order to incorporate<br />

additional core content from the two modules it would replace.<br />

iii. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc Biology with<br />

Psychology.<br />

iv. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />

Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />

Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />

be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />

presented where necessary.<br />

Action: SBCS<br />

v. Given the need to develop the Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal<br />

<strong>and</strong> incorporate additional content, the proposal was not approved. A<br />

revised proposal would be submitted to the next meeting of PMAB.<br />

Action: SBCS<br />

ii. BSc Zoology with Aquatic Biology (C3C1) <strong>and</strong> 3 associated<br />

module proposals:<br />

PMAB2010-067


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

Advanced Aquatic Biology<br />

Aquatic Biology Research Project<br />

Aquatic biology Investigative Project<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

2010:062 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BSc Zoology with<br />

Aquatic Biology <strong>and</strong> 3 associated module proposals <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme,<br />

including changes to the modules offered <strong>and</strong> the status of modules. It<br />

would apply from September 2011, not September 2010 as stated in the<br />

form. This issue would be clarified in a revised form.<br />

ii. Students had raised concern with the proposed programme amendments<br />

<strong>and</strong> the withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic<br />

Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be<br />

replaced by Advanced Aquatic Biology.<br />

iii. Current students <strong>and</strong> the external examiner had not been consulted over the<br />

withdrawal of SBC316 <strong>and</strong> SBC314, <strong>and</strong> introduction of Advanced Aquatic<br />

Biology.<br />

iv. Existing publicity material made reference to the two proposed withdrawn<br />

modules <strong>and</strong> their content. However, this was because marketing materials<br />

were usually produced a year in advance. A clear statement was also<br />

detailed in promotional materials to indicate that the precise module offering<br />

<strong>and</strong> subjects taught may be subject to change.<br />

v. A number of papers were tabled at the meeting that related to the above<br />

issue raised by students including; a summary of the reported issue; a<br />

published course synopsis <strong>and</strong> flyer for the BSc Zoology with Aquatic<br />

Biology; published module summaries for Marine Biology, Freshwater<br />

Biology <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy <strong>and</strong> Management; <strong>and</strong> a<br />

petition signed by students.<br />

vi. Following discussion it was articulated that a number of students who had<br />

signed the petition were not students enrolled on the programme. As such, a<br />

number of these students would not be directly affected by the proposed<br />

amendments / withdrawals.<br />

vii. In response to the issues raised by students, the School of Biological <strong>and</strong><br />

Chemical Sciences agreed that the module proposal for Advanced Aquatic<br />

Biology would be resubmitted to the next meeting of PMAB for consideration<br />

<strong>and</strong> approval. The content of the module would be refined in order to<br />

incorporate additional core content from the two modules it would replace.<br />

Appropriate consultation with the external examiner <strong>and</strong> students would also<br />

take place.<br />

viii. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc Zoology with<br />

Aquatic Biology.<br />

ix. The Board approved the module proposals for Aquatic Biology Research<br />

Project <strong>and</strong> Aquatic biology Investigative Project, subject to clarifying a<br />

number of issues that were discussed outside of the meeting <strong>and</strong> the<br />

submission of revised module proposal forms. The revised documentation<br />

would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />

Action: SBCS


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

x. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />

Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />

Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />

be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />

presented where necessary.<br />

xi. Given the need to develop the Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal<br />

<strong>and</strong> incorporate additional content in response to the issues identified<br />

above, the proposal was not approved. A revised proposal would be<br />

submitted to the next meeting of PMAB.<br />

Action: SBCS<br />

iii. BSc Biology (C100) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module (Advanced<br />

Aquatic Biology)<br />

PMAB2010-068<br />

2010:063 The Board considered a programme amendment <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module to<br />

apply to the BSc Biology <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme,<br />

specifically changes to the modules offered. It would apply from September<br />

2011, not September 2010 as stated in the form. This would be clarified in a<br />

revised form.<br />

ii. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />

Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />

Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />

be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />

presented where necessary.<br />

iii. The Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal was not approved (see<br />

above for further details). A revised proposal would be submitted to the next<br />

meeting of PMAB.<br />

iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc Biology.<br />

iv. BSc Zoology (C300) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module (Advanced<br />

Aquatic Biology)<br />

PMAB2010-069<br />

2010:064 The Board considered a programme amendment <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module to<br />

apply to the BSc Zoology <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme.<br />

ii. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />

Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />

Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />

be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />

presented where necessary.<br />

iii. The Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal was not approved (see<br />

above for further details). A revised proposal would be submitted to the next<br />

meeting of PMAB.<br />

iv. The Board did not approve the programme amendment to the BSc Zoology.


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

v. BSc Biochemistry (C700) PMAB2010-070<br />

2010:065 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

BSc Biochemistry.<br />

vi. BSc Psychology (C800) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module<br />

(Consciousness <strong>and</strong> Causality)<br />

PMAB2010-071<br />

2010:066 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> a programme amendment <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new<br />

module to apply to the BSc Psychology <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. Two computer science modules would be removed from the programme.<br />

ii. A new optional module, Consciousness <strong>and</strong> Causality, would be offered to<br />

students taking the programme.<br />

iii. Part of the teaching of the programme was delivered by colleagues from the<br />

Institute of Health Sciences Education (IHSE).<br />

iv. The Dean for Taught Programmes (Science <strong>and</strong> Engineering), students <strong>and</strong><br />

the external examiner had been consulted <strong>and</strong> supported the amendment.<br />

v. The Board approved the programme amendment.<br />

vi. The Board approved the module proposal for Consciousness <strong>and</strong> Causality,<br />

subject to the clarification of a number of issues that were discussed outside<br />

of the meeting <strong>and</strong> the submission of revised module proposal forms. The<br />

revised documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s<br />

Action.<br />

Action: SBCS<br />

vii. BSc Medical Genetics (C431)<br />

PMAB2010-072<br />

2010:067 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

BSc Medical Genetics.<br />

viii. BSc Chemistry with Biochemistry (F1C7)<br />

PMAB2010-073<br />

2010:068 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

BSc Chemistry with Biochemistry.<br />

ix. BSc Chemistry with Forensic Science (F1F4)<br />

PMAB2010-074<br />

2010:069 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

BSc Chemistry with Forensic Science.<br />

x. BSc Chemistry with Business Management (F1N2) PMAB2010-075<br />

2010:070 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

BSc Chemistry with Business Management.<br />

xi. BSc Chemistry (F100)<br />

PMAB2010-076<br />

2010:071 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

BSc Chemistry.


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

xii. BSc Pharmaceutical Chemistry (F151)<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

PMAB2010-077<br />

2010:072 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

BSc Pharmaceutical Chemistry.<br />

xiii. MSci Pharmaceutical Chemistry (F152)<br />

PMAB2010-078<br />

2010:073 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

MSci Pharmaceutical Chemistry.<br />

19. School of Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />

BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng Programmes with Industrial Experience <strong>and</strong> 4<br />

associated module proposals:<br />

PMAB2010-079<br />

Engineering Industrial Experience<br />

Engineering Industrial Experience<br />

Materials Industrial Experience<br />

Materials Industrial Experience<br />

2010:074 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng<br />

Programmes with Industrial Experience <strong>and</strong> 4 associated module proposals <strong>and</strong><br />

noted the following:<br />

i. The proposed amendment would give students the opportunity to undertake<br />

a one year industrial placement.<br />

ii. The proposed modules comprised 120 credits <strong>and</strong> did not contain any<br />

formal assessment that would feed into a student’s final classification.<br />

iii. It was expressed that the School of Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />

(SEMS) would charge half-fees for those students wishing to opt to take an<br />

industrial placement. This decision would also provide funds to recruit a<br />

placement officer to help facilitate students getting placements.<br />

iv. Board members stated that there was a clear need to ascertain that<br />

placement providers have had the appropriate quality assurance checks,<br />

<strong>and</strong> that students were actually benefiting from time spent with placement<br />

providers.<br />

v. The Industrial Experience model put forward by SEMS differed from the<br />

existing, well-established, model that was in operation within the School of<br />

Electrical Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science (SEECS) <strong>and</strong> the School of<br />

Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film (SLLF). As such, the Board suggested it<br />

would be useful to explore the contrasting model put forward by SEMS<br />

further, <strong>and</strong> consult SEECS <strong>and</strong> SLLF to capture good practice.<br />

vi. The Board deferred this amendment <strong>and</strong> the associated module proposals<br />

to the next meeting of PMAB, pending further discussion outside of the<br />

meeting.<br />

Action: SEMS / PMc<br />

Language <strong>and</strong> Learning Unit<br />

20i. International Foundation Programme in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong><br />

Humanities<br />

PMAB2010-080


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

2010:075 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

International Foundation Programme in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong> Humanities.<br />

20ii. Pre-Masters Diploma in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong> Humanities PMAB2010-081<br />

2010:076 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />

Pre-Masters Diploma in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong> Humanities.<br />

Part 5 – Programme Withdrawals<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

21. Summary of Programme Withdrawals:<br />

n/a<br />

i. BSc Mathematics <strong>and</strong> Physics (FG31)<br />

ii. MSc Primary Care (Multiple Codes)<br />

o MSc Primary Care (with City University)<br />

o MSc Primary Care (District Nursing )(with City<br />

University)<br />

o MSc Primary Care (Long Term Conditions)(with City<br />

University)<br />

o MSc Primary Care (Nurse Practitioner)(with City<br />

University)<br />

o PG Dip Primary Care(with City University)<br />

o PG Dip(District Nursing)(with City University)<br />

o PG Dip Primary Care (Long Term Conditions)(with City<br />

University)<br />

o PG Dip (Nurse Practitioner) (with City University)<br />

iii. Postgraduate Diploma in Aesthetic Surgery (A3D1)<br />

iv. MSc Public Health (Multiple Codes)<br />

o MSc Public Health (with City University)<br />

o MSc Public Health <strong>and</strong> Health Economics (with City<br />

University)<br />

o MSc Public Health <strong>and</strong> Urban Renewal (with City<br />

University)<br />

o MSc Public Health with Food Policy (with City<br />

University)<br />

o MSc Specialist Community Public Health Nursing<br />

(Health Visiting) (with City University)<br />

o MSc Specialist Community Public Health Nursing<br />

(School Nursing) (with City University)


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

v. BA German <strong>and</strong> Geography (LR72)<br />

vi. BA Russian <strong>and</strong> Geography (LR77)<br />

vii. BA German <strong>and</strong> Geography (LRFZ)<br />

viii. BA Russian <strong>and</strong> Geography (LRHZ)<br />

ix. BSc Natural Sciences (CFGO)<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

2010:077 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved the programme withdrawals detailed above.<br />

These withdrawals had been approved by ATRPG.<br />

Part 6 – Module Proposals<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

Faculty of Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences<br />

22. School of Business Management<br />

i. Advanced Accounting for Business PMAB2010-082<br />

2010:078 The Board considered a module proposal for Advanced Accounting for Business<br />

<strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The module comprised a one hour lecture per week over 11 weeks (totalling<br />

11 hours) <strong>and</strong> a one hour seminar per week (totalling 10 hours). As such,<br />

the Board questioned why there would be one less seminar. This issue<br />

would require clarification by the School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />

ii. The Board approved the module proposal subject to the clarification of the<br />

points detailed above.<br />

Action: SBM<br />

ii. Management Skills <strong>and</strong> Development<br />

PMAB2010-083<br />

2010:079 The Board considered a module proposal for Management Skills <strong>and</strong> Development<br />

<strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The module comprised a one hour lecture per week over 11 weeks (totalling<br />

11 hours) <strong>and</strong> a one hour seminar per week (totalling 10 hours). As such,<br />

the Board questioned why there would be one less seminar. This would<br />

require clarification by the School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />

ii. The JACS code was missing from the module proposal form <strong>and</strong> required<br />

clarification.<br />

iii. The Board approved the module proposal subject to the clarification of the<br />

points detailed above.<br />

Action: SBM<br />

23. School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Econometrics C<br />

PMAB2010-084<br />

2010:080 The Board deferred this item to the next meeting of PMAB.


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

24. School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Germany Today<br />

Catalan Cinema<br />

Venice - Explorations of an urban artscape<br />

Modern/Postmodern Cinema<br />

La Nouvelle Vague<br />

Corpus Linguistics<br />

Digital Literacy <strong>and</strong> Intercultural Communication<br />

The Return of the Renaissance in 19th century Europe <strong>and</strong> its<br />

narrative <strong>and</strong> intellectual contexts<br />

Film Archaeology<br />

Women's Writing in Early Modern France<br />

German Sociolinguistics<br />

Spanish Translation: Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice<br />

Russian Documentary Film 2 (level 5)<br />

Russian Documentary Film 2 (level 6)<br />

Introduction to the Structure <strong>and</strong> Varieties of Modern German<br />

The German Aphorism: a form of thought<br />

Approaches to African Cinema<br />

PMAB2010-085<br />

PMAB2010-086<br />

PMAB2010-087<br />

PMAB2010-088<br />

PMAB2010-089<br />

PMAB2010-090<br />

PMAB2010-091<br />

PMAB2010-092<br />

PMAB2010-093<br />

PMAB2010-094<br />

PMAB2010-095<br />

PMAB2010-096<br />

PMAB2010-097<br />

PMAB2010-098<br />

PMAB2010-099<br />

PMAB2010-100<br />

PMAB2010-101<br />

2010:081 The Board considered a number of module proposals from the School of<br />

Languages Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film (detailed above) <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

25. School of Law<br />

i. The Board commended the exemplary st<strong>and</strong>ard of module proposals<br />

presented to PMAB.<br />

ii. Modules for The Return of the Renaissance in 19 th Century Europe <strong>and</strong> The<br />

German Aphorism: a form of thought indicated September 2010 as the<br />

module start date. This information was understood to be incorrect <strong>and</strong><br />

would be amended accordingly to September 2011.<br />

Action: SLLF<br />

i. Modern Legal History PMAB2010-102<br />

2010:082 The Board considered a module proposal for Modern Legal History <strong>and</strong> noted the<br />

following:<br />

i. The module would also be made available to associate students in<br />

Semester A <strong>and</strong> Semester B. Consequently, the module proposal form<br />

would need to be amended to reflect this.<br />

ii. The Board approved the module proposal subject the submission of revised<br />

module proposal form to address the above issues. The revised<br />

documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />

Action: Law / Chair<br />

ii. Remedies in Private Law<br />

PMAB2010-103<br />

2010:083 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a module proposal for Remedies in Private<br />

Law.<br />

iii. Further Contract Law<br />

PMAB2010-104


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

2010:084 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a module proposal for Further Contract Law.<br />

Faculty of Science <strong>and</strong> Engineering<br />

26. School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />

Molecules <strong>and</strong> Ions at Interfaces by Distance Learning<br />

PMAB2010-105<br />

2010:085 The Board considered a module proposal for Molecules <strong>and</strong> Ions at Interfaces by<br />

Distance Learning <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The module was first submitted at the Extraordinary Programmes<br />

Committee meeting in April 2010 <strong>and</strong> was not approved. A number of issues<br />

were raised, particularly regarding the use of distance learning as well as the<br />

need to enhance the learning outcomes to reflect the number 6 academic<br />

level.<br />

ii. The resubmitted module proposal had addressed these points; Distance<br />

Learning materials were going to be designed in conjunction with colleagues<br />

in the QM E-Learning Unit. The learning outcomes had also been improved.<br />

iii. Since the proposal was a resubmission the Board confirmed that all points<br />

had been addressed.<br />

iv. The Board approved the module proposal.<br />

Part 7 – Module Updates<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

Summary of Approved Module Updates<br />

27. School of Physics:<br />

Mathematical Techniques I (PHY121)<br />

Statistical Physics (PHY403)<br />

n/a<br />

2010:086 The Board noted the approved module updates detailed above from the School of<br />

Physics.<br />

28. School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management:<br />

Marketing (BUS011)<br />

Financial Accounting (BUS021)<br />

Managerial Accounting (BUS022)<br />

Organisation <strong>and</strong> Identity (BUS302)<br />

n/a<br />

2010:087 The Board noted the approved module updates detailed above from the School of<br />

Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />

Part 8 – Module Withdrawals<br />

<strong>Paper</strong>


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

Summary of Module Withdrawals to Approve<br />

29. Institute of Health Sciences Education:<br />

Injection (IHSM925)<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

n/a<br />

2010:088 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved the withdrawal of the Injection module.<br />

30. School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences:<br />

Freshwater Biology (SBC316)<br />

Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management<br />

(SBC314)<br />

Introduction to Forensic Chemistry (SBC371)<br />

Forensic Science & the Legal Process (SBS645)<br />

Ecosystem Ecology (SBC303 <strong>and</strong> SBS303)<br />

Techniques for Biochemists (SBS930)<br />

n/a<br />

2010:089 The Board considered module withdrawals for the modules detailed above <strong>and</strong><br />

noted the following:<br />

i. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />

Science, Policy & Management (SBC314) would be deferred to the next<br />

meeting.<br />

Action: SBCS<br />

ii. The Board approved module withdrawals for SBC371, SBS645, SBC303<br />

<strong>and</strong> SBS303, <strong>and</strong> SBS930.<br />

Part 9 - Regulations<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

31. Special Regulations for the Learning Institute Accredited<br />

Programmes<br />

PMAB2010-106<br />

2010:090 The Board considered a proposal to implement special assessment regulations for<br />

the Learning Institute Accredited Programmes <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. The examination board for programmes from the Learning Institute did not<br />

match st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> practice. The programmes did also not report<br />

to a Degree Examination Board.<br />

ii. Under the current <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> structure the Learning Institute was not an<br />

academic department. Further clarification was required outside of the<br />

meeting regarding the organisation of the Learning Institute within <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>. Specifically, this related to the delivery of academic credit bearing<br />

courses in non-academic departments.<br />

iii. As an interim measure for this academic year only, the Learning Institute<br />

would seek permission to be included in the SMD Degree Exam Board. The<br />

rationale for this was because the award was previously housed within SMD.<br />

The Dean for Taught Programmes (SMD) would also need to support the<br />

proposed temporary relocation of the Learning Institute.


PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />

iv. The Board did not approve the special regulations <strong>and</strong> voiced concerns<br />

regarding the delivery of academic credit bearing courses in non-academic<br />

departments. Instead, an interim measure would operate for the 2010-11<br />

academic year only (see above).<br />

Part 10 – Other business<br />

<strong>Paper</strong><br />

32. Any other business n/a<br />

The Operation of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board<br />

2010:091 The Board briefly discussed the operation of the current programme <strong>and</strong> module<br />

approval process <strong>and</strong> PMAB <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />

i. Given the volume of revisions <strong>and</strong> new additions to programmes <strong>and</strong><br />

modules received via PMAB, colleagues questioned whether such changes<br />

would ultimately affect the structure <strong>and</strong> currency of programmes <strong>and</strong><br />

modules.<br />

ii. It was apparent that the communication between schools <strong>and</strong> students was<br />

somewhat variable <strong>and</strong> raised some concerns.<br />

iii. The Board agreed to allocate one of the next two meetings of PMAB as a<br />

discussion meeting in order to take stock of various issues related to<br />

programme <strong>and</strong> module approvals, <strong>and</strong> to determine how the role of the<br />

Board is progressing.<br />

33. Dates of next meeting<br />

2010:092 The meeting date of the Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board<br />

is Thursday 31st March 2011 (12-2pm) in GO Jones 602.<br />

The deadline for papers for this meeting is Thursday 10th March.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

Matters Arising Action Sheet<br />

PMAB 20 th October 2010<br />

PMAB 24 th November 2010<br />

PMAB 23 rd February 2011<br />

Key<br />

= Completed<br />

= Outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

Programme Proposals<br />

Minute Programme Details Action Progress / Comments Responsibility Programme<br />

Organiser<br />

2010:005 LLM/PgDip/PgCert<br />

Intellectual Property<br />

Law (Part 1)<br />

[October<br />

PMAB]<br />

The aims <strong>and</strong> learning outcomes required<br />

further work, particularly in order to fully<br />

reflect that the programme was a level 7<br />

programme.<br />

The JACS code for the programme was<br />

missing <strong>and</strong> was required for completeness.<br />

The Part 2 form would need to clearly identify<br />

which modules were already approved <strong>and</strong><br />

would form part of the programme (along with<br />

their associated module codes), as well as<br />

detail any new modules <strong>and</strong> incorporate new<br />

module proposal forms.<br />

Revised Part 1 Programme<br />

Proposal form outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

CCLS<br />

Noam<br />

Shemtov<br />

2010:006<br />

[October<br />

PMAB]<br />

MSc Digital Music<br />

Technology <strong>and</strong> MSc<br />

Digital Signal<br />

Processing (Part 1)<br />

Student administration would be h<strong>and</strong>led by<br />

UoL. This was not clear within the proposals<br />

<strong>and</strong> required further clarification. It was<br />

understood that UoL would award the degree<br />

but that <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> would function as the<br />

lead College.<br />

Revised Part 1 Programme<br />

Proposal forms outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

SEECS<br />

Jane Reid


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

The learning outcomes for both programmes<br />

required significant attention, as they did not<br />

accurately reflect level 7 learning outcomes.<br />

Learning outcomes should be more detailed<br />

in order to articulate the level of the<br />

programmes. The number of learning<br />

outcomes could also benefit from attention to<br />

ensure that the expectations of student<br />

learning on the programmes were better<br />

reflected.<br />

It was expressed that both MSc programmes<br />

would need to comply with UoL <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> regulations but this would be clarified by<br />

SEECS. The MSc programmes would comply<br />

with the normal SEECS regulations for award<br />

of Distinction <strong>and</strong> Merit <strong>and</strong> for progression.<br />

Representatives from UoL would attend the<br />

Board when the Part 2 Programme Proposals<br />

were submitted in order to discuss issues<br />

further <strong>and</strong> confer approval from a UoL<br />

perspective.<br />

2010:007<br />

[October<br />

PMAB]<br />

BSc Multimedia <strong>and</strong><br />

Arts Technology (Part<br />

1)<br />

The modules Production Skills (FLM016) <strong>and</strong><br />

Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique would not be offered<br />

on the programme, as further clarification with<br />

the School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

regarding any possible module contributions<br />

was required. Given that these modules<br />

would be removed, it was understood that<br />

they would be replaced by two newly created<br />

SEECS modules.<br />

Revised Part 1 Programme<br />

Proposal form outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

SEECS<br />

Jane Reid<br />

The module Emergent Multimedia<br />

Applications <strong>and</strong> Technologies (ELEM040)<br />

was a level 7 module <strong>and</strong> as such could not<br />

be offered on a level 6 programme.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

2010:008<br />

[October<br />

PMAB]<br />

BSc Multimedia <strong>and</strong><br />

Arts Technology with<br />

Industrial Experience<br />

(Part 1)<br />

Some of the learning outcomes, such as<br />

those relating to for transferable / personal<br />

skills, required further expansion, as they did<br />

not accurately reflect level 6 learning<br />

outcomes. Learning outcomes should be<br />

more detailed in order to articulate the level of<br />

the programme.<br />

The module Production Skills (FLM016) <strong>and</strong><br />

Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique would not be<br />

offered on the programme, as further<br />

clarification with the School of Languages,<br />

Linguistics & Film regarding any possible<br />

module contributions was required. Given that<br />

these modules would be removed, it was<br />

understood that they would be replaced by<br />

two newly created SEECS modules.<br />

The module Emergent Multimedia<br />

Applications <strong>and</strong> Technologies (ELEM040)<br />

was a level 7 module <strong>and</strong> as such should not<br />

be offered on a level 6 programme.<br />

Revised Part 1 Programme<br />

Proposal form outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

SEECS<br />

Jane Reid<br />

Some of the learning outcomes, such as<br />

those relating to transferable / personal skills,<br />

required further expansion, as these did not<br />

accurately reflect level 6 learning outcomes.<br />

Learning outcomes should be more detailed<br />

in order to articulate the level of the<br />

programmes.<br />

The correct programme duration was 4 years,<br />

not 3 years as specified on the original form.<br />

2010:026<br />

[November<br />

MA Linguistics (Part<br />

2 <strong>and</strong> associated<br />

module proposals<br />

The learning outcomes for a number of<br />

modules could benefit from further work <strong>and</strong><br />

refinement, particularly in order to fully reflect<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

is fine.<br />

SLLF<br />

Prof. D<br />

Adger


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

PMAB]<br />

x19*)<br />

*see PMAB papers<br />

for full details of<br />

modules.<br />

that modules are level 7 modules.<br />

The learning outcomes for the modules<br />

detailed below, in particular, would benefit<br />

from further attention:<br />

Revised Module Proposal<br />

forms required in order to<br />

address comments<br />

regarding learning<br />

outcomes.<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Qualitative Research Methods<br />

Dissertation Proseminar<br />

MA Dissertation Linguistics<br />

From Morpheme to Meaning, Formal<br />

Methods <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />

Youth Language<br />

Language Style <strong>and</strong> Stylization<br />

Research Practicum<br />

Topics in the Grammar of a Language<br />

Family or Group<br />

Understudied Languages <strong>and</strong> Linguistic<br />

Theory<br />

Bilingualism<br />

The module aims for the MA Dissertation<br />

Linguistics module required enhancement<br />

<strong>and</strong> further detail.<br />

The reading list for Applied Sociophonetics<br />

<strong>and</strong> Phonology module did not contain the<br />

publication dates of materials. These details<br />

were required in order that that the Board<br />

could gauge how current the reading<br />

materials were.<br />

2010:029<br />

[November<br />

PMAB]<br />

MSc/PgDip Trauma<br />

Science <strong>and</strong><br />

MSc/PgDip Trauma<br />

Science (Military &<br />

Austere) (Part 1)<br />

Through discussion it was understood that the<br />

postgraduate diploma element of the<br />

programme would be delivered full-time over<br />

1 year, whereas the MSc would be delivered<br />

part-time over 2 years. This issue required<br />

clarification on the Part 1 proposal form.<br />

Revised Part 1 Programme<br />

Proposal form submitted.<br />

The PgDip will not be<br />

offered as a st<strong>and</strong> alone<br />

programme <strong>and</strong> this had<br />

been addressed within the<br />

BICMS<br />

Dr. S.<br />

Eaglestone


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

The entry requirements required clarification<br />

for students with a non-medical degree.<br />

Given that the programme could attract<br />

international applicants the Board agreed that<br />

the level of a student’s English language<br />

proficiency for the programme needed to be<br />

clear <strong>and</strong> should be addressed. This included<br />

details of any required IELTS / TOEFL score.<br />

The precise fee proposed for the MSc <strong>and</strong><br />

postgraduate diploma element was a nonst<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

fee <strong>and</strong> required further clarification<br />

<strong>and</strong> approval from the Fees Office <strong>and</strong><br />

Costing <strong>and</strong> Pricing Group outside of the<br />

Board.<br />

revised Part 1 form.<br />

IELTS / TOEFL score<br />

clarified.<br />

Fees still require CPG<br />

approval.<br />

2010:048<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

MSc Finance (Part 2)<br />

The comments provided by the external<br />

advisor were not sufficiently detailed <strong>and</strong><br />

required revision. A detailed appraisal of the<br />

proposal by an external advisor should be<br />

carried out using information obtained in the<br />

External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

The programme’s learning outcomes needed<br />

to be revisited, as some did not correspond<br />

with the suggested headings of knowledge<br />

<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing, intellectual skills,<br />

transferable skills, <strong>and</strong> practical skills.<br />

According to the programme structure five<br />

modules were listed as core modules but<br />

following discussion it was suggested that<br />

they should be listed as compulsory with the<br />

dissertation listed as a core module. The<br />

designation of module status would comply<br />

with the practice adopted elsewhere within<br />

the School.<br />

Revised Part 2 Programme<br />

Proposal <strong>and</strong> revised<br />

Module Proposal form<br />

submitted <strong>and</strong> all issues<br />

raised have been<br />

addressed.<br />

SEF<br />

Prof. Francis<br />

Breedon


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

The learning outcomes for the Investments<br />

module required further work <strong>and</strong> more detail<br />

in order to fully reflect that the module was at<br />

level 7. Specifically, a number of outcomes,<br />

such as ‘to work in teams’ <strong>and</strong> ‘to work to<br />

deadlines’ were deemed not sufficiently<br />

detailed by Board members<br />

2010:054<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

MSc, PgDip <strong>and</strong><br />

PgCert<br />

Musculoskeletal<br />

Sciences (Part 1)<br />

The rationale for not differentiating between<br />

the two streams by titles was debated by the<br />

Board <strong>and</strong> it was suggested that the option for<br />

dedicated titles should be revisited. Any<br />

change in titles would be addressed in a<br />

revised Part 1 from.<br />

Revised Part 1 Programme<br />

Proposal <strong>and</strong> revised<br />

Module Proposal form<br />

required in order to address<br />

PMAB comments.<br />

Clinical track will be called’<br />

MSc Musculoskeletal<br />

Clinical Sciences’, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Science track<br />

‘Musculoskeletal Science’.<br />

WHRI<br />

Dr Michael<br />

Seed<br />

The OSCE element will be<br />

changed to Observation<br />

Structured Assessment<br />

(OSA) which will have no<br />

clinical skills component.<br />

Programme Amendments<br />

Minute Programme Details Action Progress /<br />

Comments<br />

2010:060 MSc Law <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

(M3S7, M3S8)<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

Within the specialisations, the status of modules<br />

should be listed as compulsory <strong>and</strong> not core. This<br />

required a change to the Programme Amendment<br />

Form <strong>and</strong> Programme Specification that were<br />

submitted.<br />

Revised<br />

Programme<br />

Amendment<br />

Form <strong>and</strong><br />

Programme<br />

Specification<br />

submitted.<br />

Responsibility<br />

CCLS<br />

Programme<br />

Organiser<br />

Dr. Leon<br />

Vinokur


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

2010:062<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

BSc Zoology with<br />

Aquatic Biology (C3C1)<br />

The module proposals for Aquatic Biology<br />

Research Project <strong>and</strong> Aquatic biology<br />

Investigative Project required a number of issues<br />

that were discussed outside of the meeting to be<br />

clarified <strong>and</strong> the submission of revised module<br />

proposal forms.<br />

Revised Module<br />

Proposals<br />

required.<br />

SBCS<br />

Dr Jonathan<br />

Grey<br />

Module Proposals<br />

Minute Module Details Action Progress / Comments Responsibility<br />

Module<br />

Organiser<br />

2010:035<br />

[November<br />

PMAB]<br />

Broadcasting<br />

Regulation<br />

The Programme Specification(s) for the<br />

programmes where Broadcasting Regulation<br />

would be offered should be updated to<br />

include it as a viable option module <strong>and</strong><br />

submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong>.<br />

Revised Programme<br />

Specifications required.<br />

SPIR<br />

Dr Julia<br />

Hörnle<br />

2010:078<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

Advanced<br />

Accounting for<br />

Business<br />

The module comprised a one hour lecture<br />

per week over 11 weeks (totalling 11 hours)<br />

<strong>and</strong> a one hour seminar per week (totalling<br />

10 hours). As such, the Board questioned<br />

why there would be one less seminar. This<br />

issue would require clarification by the<br />

School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management<br />

To be clarified.<br />

SBM<br />

Sean<br />

McCartney<br />

2010:079<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

Management<br />

Skills <strong>and</strong><br />

Development<br />

The module comprised a one hour lecture per<br />

week over 11 weeks (totalling 11 hours) <strong>and</strong><br />

a one hour seminar per week (totalling 10<br />

hours). As such, the Board questioned why<br />

there would be one less seminar. This would<br />

require clarification by the School of Business<br />

<strong>and</strong> Management.<br />

To be clarified.<br />

SBM<br />

Roger<br />

Johnston<br />

The JACS code was missing from the module<br />

proposal form <strong>and</strong> required clarification.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />

<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />

2010:081<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

The Return of the<br />

Renaissance in<br />

19 th Century<br />

Europe <strong>and</strong> The<br />

German<br />

Aphorism: a form<br />

of thought<br />

Modules for The Return of the Renaissance<br />

in 19 th Century Europe <strong>and</strong> The German<br />

Aphorism: a form of thought indicated<br />

September 2010 as the module start date.<br />

This information was understood to be<br />

incorrect <strong>and</strong> would be amended accordingly<br />

to September 2011.<br />

This has been corrected. SLLF Various<br />

2010:082<br />

[February<br />

PMAB]<br />

Modern Legal<br />

History<br />

The module would also be made available to<br />

associate students in Semester A <strong>and</strong><br />

Semester B. Consequently, the module<br />

proposal form would need to be amended to<br />

reflect this.<br />

Revised Module Proposal<br />

Form required.<br />

Law<br />

Andrew Le<br />

Sueur<br />

Module Withdrawals<br />

Minute Details Progress / Comments Responsibility<br />

Module<br />

Organiser


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Programme Proposals<br />

School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />

BSc Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology/ with Industrial<br />

Experience (Part 2 ) <strong>and</strong> the following 6 associated module<br />

proposals:<br />

Arts Application Programming<br />

Bridging Arts & Technology<br />

Creating Interactive Objects<br />

Creative Group Project<br />

Introduction to Digital Audio<br />

Sound Design<br />

BEng Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computing with Industrial<br />

Experience (Part 2)<br />

BEng Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Telecommunications with<br />

Industrial Experience (Part 2)<br />

BSc(Eng) Computing <strong>and</strong> ICT with Industrial Experience (Part<br />

2)<br />

BSc(Eng) Computing & ICT with Business Management with<br />

Industrial Experience (Part 2)<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

BSc (Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology with <strong>and</strong> without<br />

industrial experience<br />

The SEB is not indicated for two modules (Introduction to<br />

Digital Audio <strong>and</strong> Sound Design). This should be clarified.<br />

All the Programme Proposals require the signature of the<br />

Head of School.<br />

No other significant issues have been identified.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />

session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology<br />

Programme Code I150<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Proposed Start Date September 2012<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

School of Geography<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

N/A<br />

Programme Organiser Prof Andrea Cavallaro<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

This programme is intended to respond to a growing dem<strong>and</strong> in the industry for graduates with a high level of training in<br />

creative multimedia production, multimedia social networks, computer-driven animation, multimedia scripting, interactive<br />

multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. The<br />

programme aims to access a new population of better quality <strong>and</strong> better motivated undergraduate students by exploiting the<br />

unique competencies within EECS that shall be complemented by relevant courses from the Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Studies<br />

faculty. The programme is designed to respond to the dem<strong>and</strong> from the creative sector that requests for people who can<br />

combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills, as demonstrated from our experience with the industries linked with the MAT Doctoral


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Training Centre - http://www.mat.qmul.ac.uk/<br />

The Creative Industries form some 7% of the UK economy, similar in size to the financial services industry, with export of services<br />

of nearly £15bn in 2005 (DCMS, Creative Industries Economic Estimates Statistical Bulletin, October 2007). During 1997-2005 they<br />

grew by 6%, double the overall UK economic growth, making them important not just to the UK Digital Economy, but to the UK<br />

economy as a whole. Yet the Creative Industries are unlike almost every other industry, with a small number of large players<br />

complemented by a very large number of small businesses, micro-businesses, <strong>and</strong> individuals. Training students with the skills to<br />

maintain the UK’s position as a world leader in the Creative Industries will be a particularly important challenge - which the<br />

Doctoral Training Centre in Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology has already started addressing at graduate level. We want now to<br />

naturally complete our training provision with this undergraduate programme.<br />

Students will have access to QMUL's state-of-the art research <strong>and</strong> performance facilities including the Augmented Human<br />

Interaction Laboratory as well as extensive resources offered by industrial <strong>and</strong> public sector partners. In addition, students will<br />

also make use of the Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Studios including the Listening Room, Control Room <strong>and</strong> performance Laboratory as well as<br />

the full range of computing resources offered by the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science, including several<br />

clusters.<br />

2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

This programme covers fundamental aspects of the digital economy, creative multimedia production, computer-driven<br />

animation, multimedia scripting, interactive multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong><br />

management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. Graduates from this programme will effectively combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills.<br />

The programme aims to emphasise computer systems, digital installations <strong>and</strong> software with a special focus on new media<br />

creation; to provide a core knowledge of media production, multimedia system design; to focus on the increasingly important<br />

area of 3D graphics <strong>and</strong> computer-driven animation; to emphasise scripting <strong>and</strong> production aspects of media creation; to equip<br />

the students with the practical skills needed to modify <strong>and</strong> test a piece of software <strong>and</strong> hardware; to enable the students to<br />

develop the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, both in written <strong>and</strong> multimedia form,<br />

effectively.<br />

The career opportunities for the graduates from this programme are in the (interactive) media production, music <strong>and</strong> game<br />

industry, internet, communications <strong>and</strong> consumer industries. The blending of technical courses with business <strong>and</strong> arts courses<br />

will equip the graduates with the skills that are necessary to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> to contribute to the modern arts <strong>and</strong> media sectors<br />

of the digital economy. Opinions of relevant external key players are reported below:<br />

Steff Ungerer, Burst Tv <strong>and</strong> Newoperahero -- http://www.burst-tv.net/ -- http://www.newoperahero.com/ - “We wholeheartedly<br />

support any moves by <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University to create courses that are designed to teach students to work in new media<br />

industries. Seeing the graduates who approach our company straight out of university we realised that there is a need for a<br />

better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the professional application of their knowledge <strong>and</strong> an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how different disciplines can<br />

be connected to achieve better results. We are hopeful that these new courses at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> university will enable students to<br />

come closer to the requirements of their future workplace. We are happy to support any efforts in the direction.”<br />

Evelyn Wilson, Senior Manager LCACE (London Centre for Arts <strong>and</strong> Cultural Exchange) www.lcace.org.uk “Given the success of<br />

the recently established DTC, this proposal seems like a valuable <strong>and</strong> logical addition to QMUL's current offer. In this time of<br />

recession when public support is likely to significantly shrink in the coming years, a course such as this, that recognises the need<br />

for a plural approach to learning <strong>and</strong> that furthermore identifies that the 'creative industries' is not an entity fixed in scale, scope<br />

or nature seems like a very good addition to the department's offer. The proposed framework of encouraging students to work<br />

across the sciences, the arts, humanities AND social sciences will also surely chime positively in the near future where more<br />

joined up approaches to teaching <strong>and</strong> research resources may be not just encouraged but essential”<br />

Martyn Ware, Illustrious - http://www.illustriouscompany.co.uk/ - “I absolutely support the need for such a course, I think it's not<br />

only an excellent <strong>and</strong> logical next step but will create a virtuous circle <strong>and</strong> potential c<strong>and</strong>idates for the doctorate course. Of<br />

course the PHD students can pass on their knowledge also.”<br />

Richard Jacobs, BT - http://www.btplc.com/innovation/index.cfm - “Happy to support the proposal from a personal perspective. It<br />

looks comprehensive <strong>and</strong> relevant to the growing media industries.”


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Tim Jones, Executive Director, MOTIROTI - http://www.motiroti.com/ - “We would fully support this move to create what we're<br />

confident would be a popular course, <strong>and</strong> a positive step to respond to the huge potential of a growth area that is currently<br />

lacking sufficient programmes reflecting industry needs <strong>and</strong> innovation potential. As a natural addition to the existing phd<br />

programme, it will enhance both areas by further diversifying the options available.”<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

Audio/Video data capture <strong>and</strong> processing, <strong>and</strong> an appreciation of how these systems can be used creatively for audiovisual<br />

<strong>and</strong> computer-based content production<br />

Principles of operation, limitations, <strong>and</strong> potential <strong>and</strong> effective use of electronic media <strong>and</strong> their associated tools <strong>and</strong><br />

technologies<br />

Design, project <strong>and</strong> people management principles <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Analyse information <strong>and</strong> experiences, formulate independent judgements, <strong>and</strong> articulate reasoned arguments through<br />

reflection, review <strong>and</strong> evaluation<br />

Source, navigate, select, retrieve, evaluate, manipulate <strong>and</strong> manage information from a variety of sources<br />

Formulate reasoned responses to the critical judgements of others<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Design, plan, manage, implement, evaluate <strong>and</strong> report a significant individual project in electronic media design <strong>and</strong><br />

technology<br />

Make effective use of enabling computer technologies for post production <strong>and</strong> compositing<br />

Apply technical knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills in new situations<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

Work independently on a practical or research-based project under supervision


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Work effectively as part of a team, identifying tasks <strong>and</strong> roles, <strong>and</strong> managing time, resources <strong>and</strong> progress appropriately<br />

Analyse complex, novel <strong>and</strong> diverse situations, <strong>and</strong> identify appropriate methods of working <strong>and</strong> communicating<br />

4) Programme Structure<br />

The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />

pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />

modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />

The BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will be a single programme with three pathways as electives: creative production<br />

pathway, society <strong>and</strong> geopolitics pathway <strong>and</strong> advanced programming pathway. The programme includes a number of modules<br />

that bridge the gap between creative arts <strong>and</strong> technology to cater to the current industrial dem<strong>and</strong>. The BSc(Eng) Multimedia<br />

<strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will contain compulsory <strong>and</strong> elective modules as specified below.<br />

Six new modules are proposed:<br />

Arts Application Programming (level 4)<br />

Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (level 4)<br />

Introduction to Digital Audio (level 4)<br />

Creating Interactive Objects (level 5)<br />

Sound Design (level 5)<br />

Creative Group Project (level 5)<br />

The programme structure is as follows, all modules being worth 15 credits except where otherwise indicated:<br />

YEAR 1, SEMESTER 1: EECSx Arts Application Programming (new); EECSy Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (new); ELE105<br />

Introduction to Multimedia; DCS111 Computer Architecture<br />

YEAR 1, SEMESTER 2: ELE104 Professional Applications; ELE207 Website Design <strong>and</strong> Authoring Tools; DCS150 Fundamentals of<br />

Web Technology; EECSa Introduction to Digital Audio (new)<br />

YEAR 2, SEMESTER 1: EECSz Creating Interactive Objects (new); EECSw Creative Group Project (new); EECSb Sound Design (new);<br />

plus one of ELE161 Programming Fundamentals; FLM104 Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong><br />

Space (30 credits)<br />

YEAR 2, SEMESTER 2: DCS224 Graphical User Interfaces; ELE403 Internet Protocols; DCS237 Business Information Systems; plus<br />

one of DCS104 Object-Oriented Programming; FLM016 Production Skills; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong> Space contd (30 credits)<br />

YEAR 3, SEMESTER 1: ELE540 Emergent Multimedia Applications <strong>and</strong> Technology; ELE402 Enterprise Management; ELE521 BSc<br />

Project (30 credits); plus one of DCS339 C++ for Image Processing; FLM204 Directing Drama; FLM305 Creative Production (30<br />

credits); GEG6113 Urbanism, Culture <strong>and</strong> Modernity<br />

YEAR 3, SEMESTER 2: ELE606 Product Development; DCS318 Interaction Design; ELE521 BSc Project contd (30 credits); plus one of<br />

ELE405 3D Graphics Programming Tools; FLM205 Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> Original Script; FLM305 Creative Production<br />

contd (30 credits); GEG6116 The Geopolitics of Life<br />

Module Title<br />

Arts application programming<br />

Bridging arts <strong>and</strong> technology<br />

Introduction to Multimedia<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of Study<br />

Semester<br />

EECSx 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

EECSy 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

ELE105 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Computer architecture<br />

Professional applications<br />

Fundamentals of web technology<br />

Business information systems<br />

Introduction to digital audio<br />

Creating interactive objects<br />

Sound design<br />

Website design <strong>and</strong> authoring tools<br />

Graphical user interfaces<br />

Internet protocols<br />

Creative group project<br />

Emergent multimedia applications<br />

<strong>and</strong> technology<br />

Enterprise management<br />

Product development<br />

Interaction design<br />

BSc project<br />

DCS111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

DCS150 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

DCS237 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

EECSa 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

EECSz 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

EECSb 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

ELE207 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

DCS224 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

EECSw 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

ELE540 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 1<br />

ELE402 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 1<br />

ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 2<br />

DCS318 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 2<br />

ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> technique FLM104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />

Production skills<br />

Creative production<br />

Directing drama<br />

Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> original<br />

script<br />

FLM016 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />

FLM305 30 6 Elective 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

FLM204 15 5 Elective 3 Semester 1<br />

FLM205 15 5 Elective 3 Semester 2


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Society, culture <strong>and</strong> space<br />

Urbanism, culture <strong>and</strong> modernity<br />

The geopolitics of life<br />

Programming fundamentals<br />

Object-oriented programming<br />

C++ for image processing<br />

3D graphics programming tools<br />

GEG5110 30 5 Elective 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

GEG6113 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 1<br />

GEG6116 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />

ELE161 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />

DCS104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />

DCS339 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 1<br />

ELE405 15 5 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />

Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />

5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />

Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />

achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />

the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />

sources, including The Learning Institute<br />

The teaching, learning <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies will be tailored to the learning outcomes of the different modules. These will<br />

include lectures, practical <strong>and</strong> library-based research, presentations, group work <strong>and</strong> knowledge transfer activities. Lectures are<br />

used to introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Practical <strong>and</strong> library-based<br />

research allows students to develop skills in review, investigative methods <strong>and</strong> critical analysis. Presentations <strong>and</strong> group work<br />

enhance students' team-working <strong>and</strong> communication skills. Knowledge transfer activities increase students' awareness of the<br />

broader context of their discipline <strong>and</strong> supports them in translating their knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills to that broader<br />

context.<br />

Taught modules will be assessed through a combination of examinations (EXM), coursework (CWK), portfolio <strong>and</strong> performance<br />

(PRA), as appropriate for the content <strong>and</strong> focus of each individual module. Project modules (DIS) will be examined on the basis of<br />

a final written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the software / hardware / installation developed by the<br />

student.<br />

6) Programme Management<br />

Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />

Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />

Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />

College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />

in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />

4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />

falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Undergraduate Subject Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong><br />

approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for progression.<br />

Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />

established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />

informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />

discussing student feedback.<br />

No


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />

In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />

information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />

This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />

The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />

will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />

regular weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary between<br />

the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their (individual <strong>and</strong><br />

group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong> the students are<br />

acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all times) to students,<br />

where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong> also those available<br />

at the University level.<br />

9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />

Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />

To be advised on a case-by-case basis in conjunction with the Disability & Dyslexia Service.<br />

10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />

List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />

The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules (from EECS, Film <strong>and</strong> Geography) will be teaching in the<br />

programme. The rationalisation of the current EECS programmes following the curriculum review will free-up time of lecturers<br />

who, together with the academics who will fill the new approved EECS positions, will teach the new modules. Visiting Lecturers<br />

will be invited to complement the teaching provision for Creating Interactive Objects <strong>and</strong> to teach in Bridging Art <strong>and</strong><br />

Technology.<br />

11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />

If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />

Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />

should also be described in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />

Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />

that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

13) External Advisor Comments<br />

Comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external specialist<br />

opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in another<br />

institution. The external adviser should be able to comment on the appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the<br />

proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection criteria for <strong>and</strong> role of External<br />

Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

In addition to the opinions of relevant external key players from the industry reported above in box 2 we are providing as<br />

attachment to this document a letter by Prof. Atau Tanaka, Director of the Culture Lab at Newcastle University<br />

http://www.ncl.ac.uk/culturelab/people/profile/atau.tanaka<br />

Name & Title of External Advisor<br />

Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />

Address for Correspondence<br />

Atau Tanaka<br />

Professor <strong>and</strong> Director of the Culture Lab<br />

Culture Lab, Newcastle University, Gr<strong>and</strong> Assembly Rooms, King's Walk,<br />

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU<br />

Telephone Number 0191 246 4640 Email Address atau.tanaka@ncl.ac.uk<br />

The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />

Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? Yes<br />

> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />

regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />

session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology with Industrial Experience<br />

Programme Code I151<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Proposed Start Date September 2012<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

School of Geography<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

N/A<br />

Programme Organiser Prof Andrea Cavallaro<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

This programme is intended to respond to a growing dem<strong>and</strong> in the industry for graduates with a high level of training in<br />

creative multimedia production, multimedia social networks, computer-driven animation, multimedia scripting, interactive<br />

multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. The<br />

programme aims to access a new population of better quality <strong>and</strong> better motivated undergraduate students by exploiting the<br />

unique competencies within EECS that shall be complemented by relevant courses from the Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Studies<br />

faculty. The programme is designed to respond to the dem<strong>and</strong> from the creative sector that requests for people who can<br />

combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills, as demonstrated from our experience with the industries linked with the MAT Doctoral


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Training Centre - http://www.mat.qmul.ac.uk/<br />

The Creative Industries form some 7% of the UK economy, similar in size to the financial services industry, with export of services<br />

of nearly £15bn in 2005 (DCMS, Creative Industries Economic Estimates Statistical Bulletin, October 2007). During 1997-2005 they<br />

grew by 6%, double the overall UK economic growth, making them important not just to the UK Digital Economy, but to the UK<br />

economy as a whole. Yet the Creative Industries are unlike almost every other industry, with a small number of large players<br />

complemented by a very large number of small businesses, micro-businesses, <strong>and</strong> individuals. Training students with the skills to<br />

maintain the UK’s position as a world leader in the Creative Industries will be a particularly important challenge - which the<br />

Doctoral Training Centre in Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology has already started addressing at graduate level. We want now to<br />

naturally complete our training provision with this undergraduate programme.<br />

Students will have access to QMUL's state-of-the art research <strong>and</strong> performance facilities including the Augmented Human<br />

Interaction Laboratory as well as extensive resources offered by industrial <strong>and</strong> public sector partners. In addition, students will<br />

also make use of the Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Studios including the Listening Room, Control Room <strong>and</strong> performance Laboratory as well as<br />

the full range of computing resources offered by the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science, including several<br />

clusters.<br />

The Industrial Placement Year will give students the opportunity to utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong><br />

theoretical knowledge already acquired through the programme of study. This will will have a direct positive impact on student<br />

employability <strong>and</strong> career development.<br />

2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

This programme covers fundamental aspects of the digital economy, creative multimedia production, computer-driven<br />

animation, multimedia scripting, interactive multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong><br />

management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. Graduates from this programme will effectively combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills.<br />

The programme aims to emphasise computer systems, digital installations <strong>and</strong> software with a special focus on new media<br />

creation; to provide a core knowledge of media production, multimedia system design; to focus on the increasingly important<br />

area of 3D graphics <strong>and</strong> computer-driven animation; to emphasise scripting <strong>and</strong> production aspects of media creation; to equip<br />

the students with the practical skills needed to modify <strong>and</strong> test a piece of software <strong>and</strong> hardware; to enable the students to<br />

develop the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, both in written <strong>and</strong> multimedia form,<br />

effectively.<br />

The career opportunities for the graduates from this programme are in the (interactive) media production, music <strong>and</strong> game<br />

industry, internet, communications <strong>and</strong> consumer industries. The blending of technical courses with business <strong>and</strong> arts courses<br />

will equip the graduates with the skills that are necessary to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> to contribute to the modern arts <strong>and</strong> media sectors<br />

of the digital economy. Opinions of relevant external key players are reported below:<br />

Steff Ungerer, Burst Tv <strong>and</strong> Newoperahero -- http://www.burst-tv.net/ -- http://www.newoperahero.com/ - “We wholeheartedly<br />

support any moves by <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University to create courses that are designed to teach students to work in new media<br />

industries. Seeing the graduates who approach our company straight out of university we realised that there is a need for a<br />

better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the professional application of their knowledge <strong>and</strong> an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how different disciplines can<br />

be connected to achieve better results. We are hopeful that these new courses at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> university will enable students to<br />

come closer to the requirements of their future workplace. We are happy to support any efforts in the direction.”<br />

Evelyn Wilson, Senior Manager LCACE (London Centre for Arts <strong>and</strong> Cultural Exchange) www.lcace.org.uk “Given the success of<br />

the recently established DTC, this proposal seems like a valuable <strong>and</strong> logical addition to QMUL's current offer. In this time of<br />

recession when public support is likely to significantly shrink in the coming years, a course such as this, that recognises the need<br />

for a plural approach to learning <strong>and</strong> that furthermore identifies that the 'creative industries' is not an entity fixed in scale, scope<br />

or nature seems like a very good addition to the department's offer. The proposed framework of encouraging students to work<br />

across the sciences, the arts, humanities AND social sciences will also surely chime positively in the near future where more<br />

joined up approaches to teaching <strong>and</strong> research resources may be not just encouraged but essential”<br />

Martyn Ware, Illustrious - http://www.illustriouscompany.co.uk/ - “I absolutely support the need for such a course, I think it's not<br />

only an excellent <strong>and</strong> logical next step but will create a virtuous circle <strong>and</strong> potential c<strong>and</strong>idates for the doctorate course. Of


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

course the PHD students can pass on their knowledge also.”<br />

Richard Jacobs, BT - http://www.btplc.com/innovation/index.cfm - “Happy to support the proposal from a personal perspective. It<br />

looks comprehensive <strong>and</strong> relevant to the growing media industries.”<br />

Tim Jones, Executive Director, MOTIROTI - http://www.motiroti.com/ - “We would fully support this move to create what we're<br />

confident would be a popular course, <strong>and</strong> a positive step to respond to the huge potential of a growth area that is currently<br />

lacking sufficient programmes reflecting industry needs <strong>and</strong> innovation potential. As a natural addition to the existing phd<br />

programme, it will enhance both areas by further diversifying the options available.”<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

A4<br />

Audio/Video data capture <strong>and</strong> processing, <strong>and</strong> an appreciation of how these systems can be used creatively for audiovisual<br />

<strong>and</strong> computer-based content production<br />

Principles of operation, limitations, <strong>and</strong> potential <strong>and</strong> effective use of electronic media <strong>and</strong> their associated tools <strong>and</strong><br />

technologies<br />

Design, project <strong>and</strong> people management principles <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />

The student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

Analyse information <strong>and</strong> experiences, formulate independent judgements, <strong>and</strong> articulate reasoned arguments through<br />

reflection, review <strong>and</strong> evaluation<br />

Source, navigate, select, retrieve, evaluate, manipulate <strong>and</strong> manage information from a variety of sources<br />

Formulate reasoned responses to the critical judgements of others<br />

Reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Design, plan, manage, implement, evaluate <strong>and</strong> report a significant individual project in electronic media design <strong>and</strong><br />

technology<br />

Make effective use of enabling computer technologies for post production <strong>and</strong> compositing


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

Apply technical knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills in new situations<br />

Make a clear connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

Work independently on a practical or research-based project under supervision<br />

Work effectively as part of a team, identifying tasks <strong>and</strong> roles, <strong>and</strong> managing time, resources <strong>and</strong> progress appropriately<br />

Analyse complex, novel <strong>and</strong> diverse situations, <strong>and</strong> identify appropriate methods of working <strong>and</strong> communicating<br />

Identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)<br />

4) Programme Structure<br />

The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />

pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />

modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />

The BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will be a single programme with three pathways as electives: creative production<br />

pathway, society <strong>and</strong> geopolitics pathway <strong>and</strong> advanced programming pathway. The programme includes a number of modules<br />

that bridge the gap between creative arts <strong>and</strong> technology to cater to the current industrial dem<strong>and</strong>. The BSc(Eng) Multimedia<br />

<strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will contain compulsory <strong>and</strong> elective modules as specified below.<br />

Six new modules are proposed:<br />

Arts Application Programming (level 4)<br />

Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (level 4)<br />

Introduction to Digital Audio (level 4)<br />

Creating Interactive Objects (level 5)<br />

Sound Design (level 5)<br />

Creative Group Project (level 5)<br />

The programme structure is as follows, all modules being worth 15 credits except where otherwise indicated:<br />

YEAR 1, SEMESTER 1: EECSx Arts Application Programming (new); EECSy Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (new); ELE105<br />

Introduction to Multimedia; DCS111 Computer Architecture<br />

YEAR 1, SEMESTER 2: ELE104 Professional Applications; ELE207 Website Design <strong>and</strong> Authoring Tools; DCS150 Fundamentals of<br />

Web Technology; EECSa Introduction to Digital Audio (new)<br />

YEAR 2, SEMESTER 1: EECSz Creating Interactive Objects (new); EECSw Creative Group Project (new); EECSb Sound Design (new);<br />

plus one of ELE161 Programming Fundamentals; FLM104 Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong><br />

Space (30 credits)<br />

YEAR 2, SEMESTER 2: DCS224 Graphical User Interfaces; ELE403 Internet Protocols; DCS237 Business Information Systems; plus<br />

one of DCS104 Object-Oriented Programming; FLM016 Production Skills; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong> Space contd (30 credits)<br />

YEAR 3 - DCS250 Industrial Placement Project<br />

YEAR 4, SEMESTER 1: ELE540 Emergent Multimedia Applications <strong>and</strong> Technology; ELE402 Enterprise Management; ELE521 BSc<br />

Project (30 credits); plus one of DCS339 C++ for Image Processing; FLM204 Directing Drama; FLM305 Creative Production (30<br />

credits); GEG6113 Urbanism, Culture <strong>and</strong> Modernity<br />

YEAR 4, SEMESTER 2: ELE606 Product Development; DCS318 Interaction Design; ELE521 BSc Project contd (30 credits); plus one of<br />

ELE405 3D Graphics Programming Tools; FLM205 Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> Original Script; FLM305 Creative Production<br />

contd (30 credits); GEG6116 The Geopolitics of Life


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />

Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />

equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />

Module Title<br />

Arts application programming<br />

Bridging arts <strong>and</strong> technology<br />

Introduction to Multimedia<br />

Computer architecture<br />

Professional applications<br />

Fundamentals of web technology<br />

Business information systems<br />

Introduction to digital audio<br />

Creating interactive objects<br />

Sound design<br />

Website design <strong>and</strong> authoring tools<br />

Graphical user interfaces<br />

Internet protocols<br />

Creative group project<br />

Industrial Placement Year<br />

Emergent multimedia applications<br />

<strong>and</strong> technology<br />

Enterprise management<br />

Product development<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of Study<br />

Semester<br />

EECSx 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

EECSy 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

ELE105 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

DCS111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

DCS150 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

DCS237 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

EECSa 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

EECSz 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

EECSb 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

ELE207 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

DCS224 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

EECSw 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />

ELE540 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

ELE402 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Interaction design<br />

BSc project<br />

DCS318 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> technique FLM104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />

Production skills<br />

Creative production<br />

Directing drama<br />

Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> original<br />

script<br />

Society, culture <strong>and</strong> space<br />

Urbanism, culture <strong>and</strong> modernity<br />

The geopolitics of life<br />

Programming fundamentals<br />

Object-oriented programming<br />

C++ for image processing<br />

3D graphics programming tools<br />

FLM016 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />

FLM305 30 6 Elective 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

FLM204 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 1<br />

FLM205 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 2<br />

GEG5110 30 5 Elective 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

GEG6113 15 6 Elective 4 Semester 1<br />

GEG6116 15 6 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />

ELE161 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />

DCS104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />

DCS339 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 1<br />

ELE405 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 2<br />

Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />

5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />

Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />

achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />

the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />

sources, including The Learning Institute<br />

The teaching, learning <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies will be tailored to the learning outcomes of the different modules. These will<br />

include lectures, practical <strong>and</strong> library-based research, presentations, group work <strong>and</strong> knowledge transfer activities. Lectures are<br />

used to introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Practical <strong>and</strong> library-based<br />

research allows students to develop skills in review, investigative methods <strong>and</strong> critical analysis. Presentations <strong>and</strong> group work<br />

enhance students' team-working <strong>and</strong> communication skills. Knowledge transfer activities increase students' awareness of the<br />

broader context of their discipline <strong>and</strong> supports them in translating their knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills to that broader<br />

context.<br />

Taught modules will be assessed through a combination of examinations (EXM), coursework (CWK), portfolio <strong>and</strong> performance<br />

(PRA), as appropriate for the content <strong>and</strong> focus of each individual module. Project modules (DIS) will be examined on the basis of<br />

a final written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the software / hardware / installation developed by the<br />

No


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

student. The Industrial Placement Year module is assessed through a combination of written report (60%), viva (5%), learning<br />

journal (5%) <strong>and</strong> employer evaluations (2 x 15%).<br />

6) Programme Management<br />

Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />

Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />

Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />

College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />

in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />

4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />

falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Undergraduate Subject Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong><br />

approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for progression.<br />

Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />

established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />

informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />

discussing student feedback.<br />

7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />

In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />

information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />

This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />

The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />

will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />

regular weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary between<br />

the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their (individual <strong>and</strong><br />

group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong> the students are<br />

acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all times) to students,<br />

where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong> also those available<br />

at the University level. The Industrial Placements Manager provides dedicated support, documentation, etc for students out on<br />

Industrial Placement during their third year.<br />

9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />

Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />

To be advised on a case-by-case basis in conjunction with the Disability & Dyslexia Service.<br />

10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />

List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />

The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules (from EECS, Film <strong>and</strong> Geography) will be teaching in the<br />

programme. The rationalisation of the current EECS programmes following the curriculum review will free-up time of lecturers<br />

who, together with the academics who will fill the new approved EECS positions, will teach the new modules. Visiting Lecturers<br />

will be invited to complement the teaching provision for Creating Interactive Objects <strong>and</strong> to teach in Bridging Art <strong>and</strong><br />

Technology.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />

If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />

Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />

should also be described in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />

Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />

that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

13) External Advisor Comments<br />

Comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external specialist<br />

opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in another<br />

institution. The external adviser should be able to comment on the appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the<br />

proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection criteria for <strong>and</strong> role of External<br />

Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

In addition to the opinions of relevant external key players from the industry reported above in box 2 we are providing as<br />

attachment to this document a letter by Prof. Atau Tanaka, Director of the Culture Lab at Newcastle University<br />

http://www.ncl.ac.uk/culturelab/people/profile/atau.tanaka<br />

Name & Title of External Advisor<br />

Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />

Address for Correspondence<br />

Atau Tanaka<br />

Professor <strong>and</strong> Director of the Culture Lab<br />

Culture Lab, Newcastle University, Gr<strong>and</strong> Assembly Rooms, King's Walk,<br />

Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU<br />

Telephone Number 0191 246 4640 Email Address atau.tanaka@ncl.ac.uk<br />

The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />

Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? Yes


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? Yes<br />

> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />

regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Professor Andrea Cavallaro<br />

School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />

<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of London<br />

Professor Atau Tanaka, DMA<br />

Chair of Digital Media<br />

Director, Culture Lab<br />

Newcastle University<br />

Newcastle upon Tyne<br />

NE1 7RU United Kingdom<br />

http://www.ncl.ac.uk/culturelab/<br />

atau.tanaka@ncl.ac.uk<br />

+44-7896-306-994<br />

31 January 2011<br />

Culture Lab is an interdisciplinary research facility at Newcastle University at the<br />

intersection of art <strong>and</strong> science. Since it’s opening in 2006, Culture Lab has hosted<br />

cutting edge research in areas of interactive media, pervasive computing, funded by<br />

UK <strong>and</strong> EC research councils. We promote socially <strong>and</strong> economically compelling<br />

synergies with artists, creative industries, <strong>and</strong> cultural <strong>and</strong> scientific institutions. As<br />

Director, I bring an intellectual vision to the facility, <strong>and</strong> work directly with University<br />

senior management to develop Culture Lab as a leading vehicle for research,<br />

teaching, <strong>and</strong> engagement. As Chair of Digital Media, I occupy the first senior<br />

academic post at Newcastle University created to respond to the growing dem<strong>and</strong> to<br />

create post-graduate curricula bridging art <strong>and</strong> technology in a practice-based<br />

research context. In my own research, I am a researcher <strong>and</strong> practitioner in the area<br />

of new media <strong>and</strong> interactive music. I have helped to nurture the area of interactive<br />

media art <strong>and</strong> performance, helping to establish international conferences in the field<br />

such as the ACM Digital Library archived New Interfaces for Musical Expression<br />

(NIME).<br />

The new programme being proposed, BSc in Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology,<br />

responds, at an undergraduate level, to the same needs as we at Newcastle<br />

addressed in 2008 in creating a Master of Research in Digital Media. An area<br />

pioneered by the MIT Media Lab, <strong>and</strong> the New York University (NYU) Interactive<br />

Telecommunications Programme (ITP), <strong>and</strong> in the UK by the RCA’s Design<br />

Interactions programme, this hi-lights the development of the creative <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />

industries in the UK <strong>and</strong> indeed worldwide. The arrival of a digital society <strong>and</strong> the<br />

assimilation of interactive technologies in activities of everyday life have created the<br />

need for robust training, now at the undergraduate level, of students in technical<br />

disciplines as applied to culture <strong>and</strong> creativity.<br />

With the massive take up in all aspects of society of digital media, in culture, in<br />

entertainment, in information distribution, in communication, digital technologies have<br />

had a rapid <strong>and</strong> profound impact on human activity <strong>and</strong> social interaction. Whether it


e for the BBC delivering on their full digital switchover, the music industry entering a<br />

post-CD era, the take up of human-centric design in engineering industries, or the<br />

applications of social media <strong>and</strong> Web 2.0 to facilitate work <strong>and</strong> leisure activities, there<br />

is a clear dem<strong>and</strong> for qualified students to enter the work place. Students entering<br />

university today are digital natives who have grown up with the World Wide Web, do<br />

not see traditional disciplinary boundaries in the same way that traditional institutional<br />

silos are currently still organised, <strong>and</strong> will choose universities that will offer for them<br />

what is second nature.<br />

The proposed programme’s rationale <strong>and</strong> aims respond to this new l<strong>and</strong>scape in a<br />

robust <strong>and</strong> academically rigorous way. In responding to needs arising from the<br />

commercial sector, it is nonetheless crucial not to conceive of a purely vocational<br />

course of study. The inclusion of modules from humanities disciplines (from areas<br />

such as Drama where <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>’s excellence is recognised) demonstrates an<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the need to transmit to students a deeper view of the meaning of<br />

technological development in society. By drawing on the MAT Digital Economy<br />

Doctoral Training Centre, <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> builds on academic excellence <strong>and</strong> the<br />

success of integrating creative disciplines in a school of engineering.<br />

The new modules designed for the curriculum fit the format of similar offerings we<br />

have conceived at Newcastle <strong>and</strong> that are offered at a post-graduate level at<br />

Goldsmiths. The challenge of teaching computer programming in an applied, creative<br />

way is today a clear trend, <strong>and</strong> facilitated by the high level multimedia languages like<br />

Processing available today. To connect the algorithmic world to the real world through<br />

interactive objects is the area of Physical Computing pioneered at NYU <strong>and</strong> that is<br />

today broadly practiced on the Arduino platform. The group project module hi-lights<br />

the practice-based nature of all this work, <strong>and</strong> teach students not just real world<br />

applications, but the need to conceive <strong>and</strong> design realisable, feasible projects, <strong>and</strong><br />

teach project management skills. Finally, the Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology module<br />

addresses the fundamental theoretical debate at the heart of this area of study, <strong>and</strong><br />

of this thrust in contemporary societal change, the increasing integration of the<br />

technological <strong>and</strong> the cultural.<br />

The appropriateness of the new programme is therefore clear. The reputation <strong>and</strong><br />

track record of EECS <strong>and</strong> their stature in this area, with the Centre for Digital Music<br />

<strong>and</strong> the MAT DTC attest to the viability <strong>and</strong> intellectual rigour of the new programme.<br />

Faithfully,


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Arts Application Programming<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2012<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

G620 Programming<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2012/13 10 6 20<br />

2013/14 15 6 25<br />

2014/15 20 6 30


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The rationale is to provide a programming module that focuses on the applications that can be created, rather than on gradually<br />

building up a detailed knowledge of programming. Students will be encouraged to build <strong>and</strong> decompose applications using<br />

processing (visual applications) <strong>and</strong> Java (music API). The rationale is that the structures <strong>and</strong> notation can be explained in the<br />

context of each application, thus getting students to focus on how programming can be used to generate creative applications.<br />

It is a compulsory module on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology [needed prior to the 2nd year 'creative group project'<br />

module].<br />

This module could also be offered to students from non-technical departments who want to underst<strong>and</strong> how to create artsbased<br />

applications. No prior programming experience needed. Prerequisite modules: none.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Open source software <strong>and</strong> development environments<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Arts Application Programming<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Karen Shoop<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module will introduce programming to students through designing <strong>and</strong> building arts applications. Students will learn to<br />

build graphics-based applications using Processing <strong>and</strong> audio applications using Java. By focussing on the range of applications<br />

that can be built, students will learn programming skills. The focus on this module is as much on the creativity of ideas as on how<br />

to write code to realise these ideas.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aim of this module is to focus on what computer programmes can do - i.e. the applications that can be developed - <strong>and</strong> use<br />

this to extract key structures <strong>and</strong> features of the chosen programming language (Java). This will encourage an exploratory<br />

approach as students see how modifying arts applications results in different outputs. Programmes will be built using a topdown<br />

approach, with a focus on what the application needs or should do, rather than by gradually developing programming<br />

skills. The aim is by stressing creativity of development students will become aware of what underpins the applications. Students<br />

will be encouraged to develop their own ideas for projects, being judged on an imaginative approach as much as on their correct<br />

coding.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

Core computer programming (Java)<br />

Complexity of program design<br />

A range of Application Programming Interfaces that aid creative development<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Apply programming skills to address a given problem<br />

Critically evaluate <strong>and</strong> test: analyse the extent to which a computer programme meets the criteria defined for its current use<br />

(<strong>and</strong> future development)<br />

Engage in computational thinking including its relevance to creative practice<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Specify, design <strong>and</strong> construct computer programmes (in Java)<br />

Translate a creative idea into a set of patterns<br />

Apply st<strong>and</strong>ard techniques to solve problems (debugging)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Translate creative ideas into precise ordered development steps<br />

Develop project proposals <strong>and</strong> specifications<br />

Work autonomously on a given problem or scenario<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

- Head First Java (2nd edition), Kathy Sierra <strong>and</strong> Bert Bates, O'Reilly, ISBN 0-596-00920-8<br />

- Processing: A Programming H<strong>and</strong>book for Visual Designers <strong>and</strong> Artists - Casey Reas, Ben Fry, <strong>and</strong> John Maeda, MIT Press<br />

- Processing: Creative Coding <strong>and</strong> Computational Art - Ira Greenberg<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

lectures: 22 hours<br />

tutorials: 8 hours<br />

programming labs: 20 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

100 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Coding Project Coursework 5 weeks 30 No 30%<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

Examination Examination 2.5 hours 70 Yes 30%<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 2.5 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2012<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />

G490 Computing Science not elsewhere classified<br />

W990 Creative Arts <strong>and</strong> Design not elsewhere classified<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2012/13 10 6 20<br />

2013/14 15 6 25<br />

2014/15 20 6 30


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module has three key aims: to encourage students to think creatively <strong>and</strong> use this to explore ideas of systems; to contrast<br />

how narrative <strong>and</strong> artworks discuss <strong>and</strong> use communication technologies <strong>and</strong> what these technologies actually do; to develop<br />

student writing skills. This module focuses on an engagement with artistic methods that can be used to inform <strong>and</strong> develop<br />

computing technologies. Students will be encouraged to use drawing, construction <strong>and</strong> performance to explore technologies<br />

<strong>and</strong> to express their ideas for potential communication applications. Students will also explore various narratives of technology<br />

as an introduction to what culture promises about technology. This will be compared <strong>and</strong> contrasted to what technology actually<br />

does <strong>and</strong> how it works with an introduction to algorithms, data structures <strong>and</strong> communication protocols. These discussions will<br />

be developed in student writings, both to explore creative narratives <strong>and</strong> to develop critical writing skills.<br />

This module will be compulsory on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology (MAT) programme <strong>and</strong> can be offered to<br />

students from non-technical departments. No prior programming experience needed. Prerequisite modules: none.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Interactive screens (<strong>and</strong> related software), ideally interactive tables. Ideally this<br />

module would have all these in a 'fabrication lab' that would also allow students<br />

to explore that ideas through basic construction<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Karen Shoop<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module investigates the relevance of creativity to computers <strong>and</strong> their applications. Students will develop ideas through a<br />

range of artistic practices to see how creativity informs technological development. Student writing will be developed through<br />

exploring narratives of technology, such as science fiction, using this as a springboard to underst<strong>and</strong> the protocols <strong>and</strong><br />

algorithms that underpin the technologies used in the digital world.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aim of this module is to remove the perceived barrier between technology <strong>and</strong> creativity. Students will be encouraged to<br />

explore how visual (e.g. drawing), performance <strong>and</strong> narrative skills can inform <strong>and</strong> enhance the creation of technologies.<br />

Students will use a range of art practice to break down assumptions of what technology should do <strong>and</strong> look like. Core writing<br />

skills (creative <strong>and</strong> essay skills) will also be developed through investigating narratives of technology, e.g. science fiction, <strong>and</strong><br />

contrasting this with factors, such as protocols <strong>and</strong> algorithms, that underpin the technologies we use. The aim is to enable<br />

students to be as confident drawing their ideas as discussing flows of information in protocols, or the appropriate data structures<br />

to store their data.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

Art practice as systems<br />

Computer protocols<br />

Importance of algorithms <strong>and</strong> data structures<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Apply given tools/methods accurately <strong>and</strong> carefully to a well defined problem <strong>and</strong> appreciate the complexity of the related<br />

issues.<br />

Reflect <strong>and</strong> communicate: present succinctly (orally, electronically or in writing) rational <strong>and</strong> reasoned arguments that<br />

address a given information h<strong>and</strong>ling problem or opportunity, including assessment of the impact of new technologies.<br />

Computational thinking including its relevance to everyday life.<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Use creative skills to structure applications <strong>and</strong> communicate intention<br />

Evaluate systems in terms of general quality attributes <strong>and</strong> possible trade-offs presented within the given problem.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

C 3<br />

Deploy effectively a range of tools used for the construction <strong>and</strong> documentation of computer applications<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Explore a more reflective attitude towards methods of learning<br />

Manage one's own learning <strong>and</strong> development including time management <strong>and</strong> organisational skills<br />

Numeracy <strong>and</strong> literacy in both underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> presenting cases involving a quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative dimension<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

- "Science Fiction", Roger Luckhurst<br />

- "Information is Beautiful", David McC<strong>and</strong>less<br />

- "Protocol: how control exists after decentralization", Alex<strong>and</strong>er R. Galloway<br />

- Leonardo (Journal of the International Society for the Arts, Sciences <strong>and</strong> Technology, ISAST)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

22 hours lectures<br />

8 hours tutorials<br />

10 hours practical sessions<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

110 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

creative assignment Practical 5 weeks 50% No 30% on C/W<br />

algorithms/protocols (probably<br />

class test)<br />

technology writing project<br />

(development of writing skills)<br />

Coursework 2 hours 20% No 30% on C/W<br />

Coursework 5 weeks 30% Yes 30%<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 2.5 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Creating Interactive Objects<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2013<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />

H600 Electronic <strong>and</strong> Electrical Engineering<br />

G400 Computer Science<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2013/14 10 6 20<br />

2014/15 15 6 25<br />

2015/16 20 6 30


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The module provides students with skills to design <strong>and</strong> develop interactive objects which form a core part of the Multimedia <strong>and</strong><br />

Arts Technology skillset. It will be a compulsory module on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology programme.<br />

This module could also be offered to students from non-technical departments of QMUL, subject to completion of the<br />

appropriate prerequisite module (‘Arts Application Programming’).<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Teaching room with computers for students <strong>and</strong> data projector <strong>and</strong> whiteboard<br />

facilities for lecturer. Two Arduino development kits per student, with a selection<br />

of small electronic items such as resistors, motors, sensors, LEDs, prototyping<br />

breadboards, <strong>and</strong> so on, as would be found in an undergraduate Electronics<br />

laboratory. Access to suitable equipment such as soldering irons, solder, wire,<br />

<strong>and</strong> prototyping materials such as wood, plastic, screws, glue, nails, hammers,<br />

etc. <strong>and</strong> suitable safety equipment such as goggles <strong>and</strong> gloves.<br />

Also required are a selection of more advanced components for Arduino<br />

including external LCD <strong>and</strong> LED displays, stepper motors, microphones,<br />

speakers, InfraRed LEDs, Ethernet cards, Bluetooth cards, Wifi cards.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Creating Interactive Objects<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr. N. Bryan-Kinns<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

Arts Application Programming<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

Interactive objects are physical devices controlled by microcontrollers using simple sensors <strong>and</strong> actuators. The module provides<br />

students with skills, knowledge, <strong>and</strong> experience of designing <strong>and</strong> prototyping interactive physical objects using contemporary<br />

microcontrollers. The module covers basic electronics, control circuits, sensors (analogue <strong>and</strong> digital), output (analogue <strong>and</strong><br />

digital), microcontrollers, simple networking, <strong>and</strong> microcontroller programming using the popular Arduino open-source<br />

platform. It additionally touches on topics of interaction design <strong>and</strong> evaluation to provide a framework in which students can


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

prototype <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> interactive objects.<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

Interactive objects are increasingly appearing in computing <strong>and</strong> interactive art domains including tangible computing <strong>and</strong><br />

embedded objects. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the underlying principles <strong>and</strong> design of the interactive artefacts will st<strong>and</strong> students in good<br />

stead for producing innovative <strong>and</strong> engaging pieces of interactive physical objects. After successfully completing the module<br />

students will be able to create interactive physical objects that use sensors <strong>and</strong> actuators to interact with the real world<br />

autonomously or networked with other devices <strong>and</strong> controllers.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

Basic electronics including dc, resistors, diodes, parallel <strong>and</strong> serial circuit configurations.<br />

Programming micro-controllers, specifically using the Arduino platform.<br />

Using sensors in Interactive Objects<br />

Design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of Interactive Objects in terms of enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement frameworks<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Apply models of enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement to the design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of Interactive Objects.<br />

Design <strong>and</strong> build simple interactive microcontroller software using a variety of input <strong>and</strong> output.<br />

Translate technologies into applicable creative media


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Physically prototype Interactive Objects. This may include building small objects from wood, plastic, etc. using glue,<br />

screws, etc. <strong>and</strong> may include transferable skills such as soldering.<br />

Solve problems analytically <strong>and</strong> creatively<br />

Report <strong>and</strong> present results in an intuitive <strong>and</strong> concise form<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Critique <strong>and</strong> reflect upon design decisions using frameworks for underst<strong>and</strong>ing enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement<br />

Prepare for <strong>and</strong> deliver oral <strong>and</strong> visual presentations<br />

Assess individual stress management <strong>and</strong> time management<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

- Massimo Banzi, Getting Started with Arduino, O'Reilly Media / Make<br />

- Tom Igoe, Making Things Talk: Practical Methods for Connecting Physical Objects, O'Reilly Media / Make, 2007


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

The module is delivered as a combination of lectures <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s-on<br />

lab session. Lab work is essential.<br />

Lectures: 2 hours per week<br />

Lab: 4 hours per week<br />

= 72 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

6.5 hours per week<br />

= 78 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Interactive Object Design <strong>and</strong><br />

Evaluation<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Coursework 2 weeks 10 30%<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

Interactive Object Build Coursework 6 weeks 50 30%<br />

Theories of design <strong>and</strong> evaluation Examination St<strong>and</strong>ard exam 40 Yes 30%<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Creative group project<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type DPM Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2013<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />

G920 Others in Computing Sciences<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

n/a<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

n/a<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2014/15 10 6 20<br />

2015/16 15 6 25<br />

2016/17 20 6 30


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module intends to provide students with h<strong>and</strong>s-on knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience to work as successful modern digital<br />

multimedia engineers. Students will apply knowledge gained in prior modules to produce a system that can be used creatively<br />

for audio-visual <strong>and</strong> computer-based content production or interactive installations, objects or tools.<br />

The module will help prepare students with knowledge of audio <strong>and</strong> video factors for the multimedia industries, ranging from<br />

interactive web design <strong>and</strong> gaming to audio <strong>and</strong> video production. The achievements in the project will form an important part<br />

in the portfolio of the students. In addition students will gain experience in team working, time management <strong>and</strong> project<br />

development. The module will give students the chance to demonstrate what they have learned in the taught part of<br />

programme in order to produce original work.<br />

The module will be compulsory on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia Arts Technology (MAT) undergraduate degree <strong>and</strong> can be offered to<br />

students from non-technical departments, subject to completion of the appropriate prerequisite module (‘Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong><br />

Technology’).<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Students will make use of existing research <strong>and</strong> performance facilities within<br />

EECS. This includes the listening room <strong>and</strong> the augmented human interaction<br />

laboratory . Hardware prototyping platforms (such as for example Arduino) <strong>and</strong><br />

the electronics laboratory will be used in projects involving creation of<br />

interactive objects.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Creative group project<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Prof Andrea Cavallaro<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

The module will be practice-based where students work in a team to produce a creative system for audio-visual content<br />

production or interactivity. Students will work in a team to identify the elements in a product development cycle; develop an<br />

audio, video, multimedia product with particular attention to its aesthetics, usability <strong>and</strong> marketability; analyse <strong>and</strong> present<br />

results in qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative measures; report <strong>and</strong> present findings in a clear <strong>and</strong> coherent manner.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The principal aims of the module are<br />

- To apply creativity in product development<br />

- To equip students with a detailed underst<strong>and</strong>ing of a product development cycle<br />

- To provide students with the experience of critically <strong>and</strong> artistically creating <strong>and</strong> examining multimedia content<br />

- To equip students with the necessary practical skills for conducting a major project<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

Creative design for audiovisual content development<br />

Tools available for content production<br />

Translating multimedia technologies into applicable creative media<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Critically assess a wide range of media<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> apply the principles underlying team working <strong>and</strong> group problem solving tasks<br />

Design, analyse <strong>and</strong> evaluate alternative solutions to novel problems<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

Prepare for <strong>and</strong> deliver oral <strong>and</strong> visual presentations


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Assess individual stress management <strong>and</strong> time management skills<br />

Report <strong>and</strong> present results in an intuitive <strong>and</strong> concise form<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Solve problems analytically <strong>and</strong> creatively<br />

Manage conflict <strong>and</strong> negotiation within a team<br />

Make oral <strong>and</strong> written presentations<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

- P. Trott, Innovation Management <strong>and</strong> New Product Development, 2008, Prentice Hall<br />

- S. Rogerson, Project Skills H<strong>and</strong>book, 1998, Chartwell-Bratt<br />

- T De Marco The Deadline: A Novel About Project Management, 1997, Dorset House


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

The module will be largely practical involving team work with<br />

regular meetings with the assigned supervisor<br />

Meeting with supervisor: 2 hours per week<br />

= 24 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Group meetings (involving planning, discussion<br />

<strong>and</strong> integration): 3 hours per week<br />

Working individually or with the team: 7.5 hours per week<br />

= 126 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Mid-project review Coursework 3,000 words 30 No 30%<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

Final project assessment Dissertation 10,000 words 70 Yes 30%<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Final project assessment Dissertation 10,000 words<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Introduction to Digital Audio<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />

H341 Acoustics<br />

H610 Electronic Engineering<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

None<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 5 20<br />

2012/13 15 5 25<br />

2013/14 20 8 35


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The module provides students with the theoretical knowledge to underst<strong>and</strong> the principles <strong>and</strong> concepts of digital audio, <strong>and</strong><br />

the practical skills to analyse <strong>and</strong> create digital audio themselves. It will exp<strong>and</strong> the existing suite of multimedia modules within<br />

the School, providing greater choice for the students, <strong>and</strong> offer tailored <strong>and</strong> better preparation for existing audio-related<br />

modules at levels 6 <strong>and</strong> 7.<br />

The module will be compulsory in the BEng Audio Systems Engineering <strong>and</strong> MEng Digital Audio <strong>and</strong> Music Systems Engineering,<br />

<strong>and</strong> an optional module in the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Teaching room with data projector, whiteboard facilities <strong>and</strong> stereo audio<br />

playback. Laboratory facilities with computers <strong>and</strong> headphones. Portable audio<br />

recorders. Access to C4DM's studio facilities.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Introduction to Digital Audio<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr. Josh Reiss<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This course covers the entire field of digital audio, including some depth in the subfields <strong>and</strong> related subjects. It is concerned with<br />

the creation, representation, modification <strong>and</strong> evaluation of digital audio. It introduces the basics of sound, <strong>and</strong> the key concepts<br />

of acoustics that are required to underst<strong>and</strong> how sound is created, represented, transmitted <strong>and</strong> perceived. The important<br />

characteristics of sound are described, such as the intensity, frequency, pitch <strong>and</strong> timbre. It gives students the knowledge to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> how sound may be accurately represented digitally. Different representations, such as wav, midi <strong>and</strong> mp3 are<br />

introduced. The students are also taught critical listening skills, including the ability to properly create, record <strong>and</strong> discern<br />

sounds, identify subtle problems, identify frequencies, <strong>and</strong> hear hidden distortions.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

An underst<strong>and</strong>ing of digital audio is essential for anyone pursuing music technology or audio engineering, <strong>and</strong> is a highly useful<br />

skill for anyone studying multimedia.<br />

This module aims to provide students with;<br />

- knowledge of the fundamentals of acoustics <strong>and</strong> sound<br />

- underst<strong>and</strong>ing of digital audio <strong>and</strong> its representations<br />

- the ability to create <strong>and</strong> edit audio<br />

- critical listening skills<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

Digital representations of sound<br />

Critical listening skills<br />

Audio formats <strong>and</strong> their usage<br />

Software <strong>and</strong> hardware tools for creating <strong>and</strong> manipulating audio<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Listen critically to audio <strong>and</strong> identify possible problem issues<br />

Evaluate the quality of multimedia resources<br />

Transfer <strong>and</strong> apply knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing gained in other media to an audio context<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Critique <strong>and</strong> reflect upon alternative design choices<br />

Translate creative ideas into precise ordered development steps


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

C 3<br />

Demonstrate numeracy <strong>and</strong> literacy skills in underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> presenting quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative data <strong>and</strong><br />

explanations appropriately<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Make principled design decisions using frameworks for underst<strong>and</strong>ing enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement<br />

Record, edit <strong>and</strong> playback audio using st<strong>and</strong>ard hardware <strong>and</strong> software tools<br />

Create <strong>and</strong> manipulate multimedia objects<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Howard <strong>and</strong> Angus, Acoustics <strong>and</strong> Psychoacoustics<br />

Everest, Critical Listening Skills for Audio Professionals<br />

Ken C Pohlmann, Principles of Digital Audio


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

The module is delivered as a combination of lectures <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s-on<br />

lab session. Lab work is essenial.<br />

Lectures: 3 hours per week<br />

Lab: 3 hours per week<br />

= 72 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

6.5 hours per week<br />

= 78 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

MCQ Coursework 2 hours 15 No 30% on C/W<br />

Lab assignments/field work Practical 6 weeks 25 No 30% on C/W<br />

Final exam Examination 2.5 hours 60 Yes 30%<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Sound Design<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />

H341 Acoustics<br />

H610 Electronic Engineering<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

None<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 5 20<br />

2012/13 15 5 25<br />

2013/14 20 8 35


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Synthesis, DSP <strong>and</strong> software development are increasingly required in the discipline of Sound Design, a part of film, radio,<br />

television, theatre <strong>and</strong> computer game development. St<strong>and</strong> alone, embedded or mobile audio applications are increasingly<br />

popular. Within film production the role of "technical sound designer" <strong>and</strong> within games development the role of "Audio<br />

programmer/implementor" has been identified. Dem<strong>and</strong> continues to grow. The art <strong>and</strong> science of "sound design" intersects, to<br />

some degree, with subjects in the JACS codes listed below.<br />

G440 Human-computer Interaction<br />

G150 Mathematical Modelling<br />

G330 Stochastic Processes<br />

G610 Software Design<br />

H674 Virtual Reality Engineering<br />

W613 Film & Sound Recording<br />

W614 Visual <strong>and</strong> Audio Effects<br />

W280 Interactive <strong>and</strong> Electronic Design<br />

W212 Multimedia Design<br />

W430 Producing for Theatre<br />

F380 Acoustics (in architectural context) K120 Interior Architecture<br />

H341 Acoustics (in engineering context)<br />

H342 Vibration<br />

F321 Solid state Physics<br />

C850 Cognitive Psychology<br />

G710 Speech <strong>and</strong> Natural Language Processing<br />

H713 Production Processes<br />

N562 Corporate Image (br<strong>and</strong>ing)<br />

P132 Archive studies<br />

P300 Media studies<br />

Q131 Phonetics<br />

Q130 Phonetics <strong>and</strong> Phonology<br />

B110 Anatomy<br />

W810 Scriptwriting<br />

This module is aimed at those who wish to gain a basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of sound synthesis, signal processing as it relates to sound<br />

design. Those seeking supporting knowledge for software design of DAW, plugins, sequencers, <strong>and</strong> sound analysis applications<br />

would also be served.<br />

It will be compulsory on the BEng Audio Systems Engineering <strong>and</strong> the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology. It could also be<br />

an optional <strong>and</strong> widely available interdisciplinary module for others outside the school.<br />

Resource Requirements


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

A quiet teaching room with data projector, whiteboard facilities <strong>and</strong> good<br />

quality stereo audio playback with small mixer at teachers desk. Adequate<br />

internet access with unencumbered internal networking at an adequate<br />

b<strong>and</strong>width for network audio work. A webspace with CGI run permissions for<br />

instructors to put coursework, examples <strong>and</strong> interactive materials.<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Students to maintain laptops with:<br />

Pure Data<br />

Csound<br />

CCRMA-SND or Spear analysis programs<br />

gcc/g++ compiler <strong>and</strong> audio libraries<br />

Audacity sound editor<br />

Lecture room to have adequate power outlets for student laptops while<br />

meeting safety requirements (eg not all in one place with trailing cables).<br />

Laboratory facilities with computers, audio editing <strong>and</strong> sequencing<br />

software, <strong>and</strong> headphones. Portable audio recorders. Access to C4DM's studio<br />

facilities.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Sound Design<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr. Josh Reiss<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None (there will be recommended<br />

modules including Basic Physics,<br />

Maths to pre calculus, at least 1 year<br />

programming experience, but none<br />

required)<br />

None<br />

None, although this would be<br />

excellent to study alongside<br />

Computer Game development,<br />

Audio production for film, radio or<br />

TV<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module covers fundamental technical <strong>and</strong> creative aspects of sound production, for both st<strong>and</strong>alone audio projects <strong>and</strong><br />

audio for film, games or music. It introduces topics such as skills in sound design; fundamental technical <strong>and</strong> creative aspects of<br />

sound production; fundamentals of computer audio; aesthetic <strong>and</strong> interpretive subjects; <strong>and</strong> the natural basis of sound.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

To learn basic sound design for film, theatre, games <strong>and</strong> music.<br />

To underst<strong>and</strong> the main tools <strong>and</strong> technologies in sound design <strong>and</strong> production.<br />

To introduce the basic principles of sound synthesis.<br />

To develop concepts in sound design.<br />

To introduce the potential for sound design through software programming environments.<br />

On completion of the module, students should be able to:<br />

1. Demonstrate an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of sound <strong>and</strong> music composition <strong>and</strong> editing, including a practical <strong>and</strong> theoretical<br />

approach.<br />

2. Apply underst<strong>and</strong>ing of simple sound synthesis.<br />

3. Underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> use sequencers, mixers, digital audio workstations, mixing consoles <strong>and</strong> other forms of audio editors.<br />

4. Use programming methods to build sound objects <strong>and</strong> sound scenes in a digital audio workstation environment.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

Basic Sound Design<br />

Electronic music<br />

Synthesisers <strong>and</strong> samplers<br />

Software <strong>and</strong> hardware tools for sound design<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Critique <strong>and</strong> analyse composed sound<br />

Evaluate alternative design decisions using formal frameworks<br />

Analyse, compare <strong>and</strong> contrast the nature <strong>and</strong> quality of diverse multimedia resources<br />

Transferable skills - able to:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Use fundamental knowledge to investigate new <strong>and</strong> emerging technologies<br />

Translate creative ideas into precise ordered development steps<br />

Demonstrate numeracy <strong>and</strong> literacy skills in underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> presenting quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative data <strong>and</strong><br />

explanations appropriately<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Create <strong>and</strong> manipulate multimedia objects<br />

Create original sound content<br />

Manipulate multichannel audio<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Designing Sound, Andy Farnell, MIT Press<br />

Sound for Picture: An Inside Look at Audio Producction for Film <strong>and</strong> Television. eds. Jeff Forlenza <strong>and</strong> Terri Stone. Hal Leonard<br />

Publishing Corporation, 1993.<br />

Sound Theory, Sound Practice: Ed. Rick Altman, AFI FIlm Readers/ Routledge, NY. 1992<br />

Sound Design: The Expressive Power of Music, Voice <strong>and</strong> Sound Effects in Cinema. David Sonnenschein., Michael Weise<br />

Productions, 2001


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

The module is delivered as a combination of lectures <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s-on<br />

lab session. Lab work is essential.<br />

Lectures: 3 hours per week<br />

Lab: 3 hours per week<br />

= 72 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

6.5 hours per week<br />

= 78 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

Fieldwork (submitted project) Practical 2 weeks 25 No 30% on C/W<br />

Lab assignments Coursework 6 weeks 25 No 30% on C/W<br />

Examination Examination 2.5 hours 50 Yes 30%<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />

session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title Electronic Engineering & Computing with Industrial<br />

Experience<br />

Programme Code IH16<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Engineering (BEng) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

The proposed programme develops the existing programme BEng Electronic Engineering & Computing by adding an Industrial<br />

Experience year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give students the opportunity to<br />

utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired through the programme of<br />

study. This will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

The Electronic Engineering accredited degrees form a group of programmes with the same broad aims <strong>and</strong> objectives; the<br />

difference being that they address different technical flavours of the broad spectrum of the subject area.<br />

Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives are, therefore, common across the family, but the instantiation of these objectives may make use<br />

of different technical aspects within the family.<br />

Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives describe the differences between the programmes <strong>and</strong> Level-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />

between the BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng degrees.<br />

Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />

At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following abilities:<br />

• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations;<br />

• the ability to apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation;<br />

• the ability to use Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering;<br />

• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software);<br />

• the ability to recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong><br />

software ‘tools’ relevant to that particular issue;<br />

• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />

• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />

• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are made in industry;<br />

• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in society;<br />

<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />

• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong><br />

high-level languages;<br />

• the practical skills needed to implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment;<br />

• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a hardware or software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to<br />

identify faults;<br />

• the design skills needed to synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the<br />

best option from a range of<br />

alternatives), to implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original specification;<br />

• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in particular written information, effectively;<br />

• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic.<br />

Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />

• To emphasise computer systems <strong>and</strong> software;<br />

• To focus in particular on the increasingly important area of artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing.<br />

An industrial placement during the programme supports student learning about the application of Electronic Engineering &<br />

Computing in an organisational context. The aims of the placement year are to:<br />

• Ground the taught components of the programme in practical experience at a scale not possible within the College<br />

• Improve career preparation, giving students a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of future career options, improving their career prospects.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />

practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />

artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing<br />

the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />

the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />

relevant to that particular issue<br />

reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />

synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />

range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />

reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />

apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />

apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />

make a clearer connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages<br />

communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />

identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

4) Programme Structure<br />

The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />

pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />

modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />

Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />

Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />

The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />

Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />

equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />

X<br />

Module Title<br />

Telecommunications & Internet<br />

Fundamentals<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Semester<br />

ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Introduction to Electronic Systems ELE102 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Engineering Mathematics MAE111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Fundamentals of Web Technology ELE205 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Digital Circuit Design ELE202 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Software Engineering ELE304 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Digital Systems Design ELE335 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Signals & Systems Theory ELE374 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Internet Applications ELE404 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

X Microprocessor Systems Design ELE465 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />

X BEng Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X Digital Signal Processing ELE502 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Software Tools for Engineers ELE595 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Enterprise Management ELE402 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Artificial Intelligence ELE611 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X Product Development ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X Multimedia Systems ELE006 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />

5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />

Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />

achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />

the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />

sources, including The Learning Institute<br />

Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />

introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />

develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />

<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />

students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />

The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />

project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />

hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />

skills.<br />

The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />

evaluation forms (30%).<br />

No


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

6) Programme Management<br />

Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />

Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />

Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />

College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />

in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />

4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />

falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />

progression.<br />

Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />

established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />

informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />

discussing student feedback.<br />

7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />

In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />

information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />

None<br />

8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />

This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />

The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />

will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />

regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />

between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />

(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />

the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />

times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />

also those available at the University level.<br />

During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />

monitors the placement.<br />

9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />

Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />

None<br />

10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />

List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />

The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />

If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />

Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />

should also be described in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />

Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />

that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

13) External Advisor Comments<br />

Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />

specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />

another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />

appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />

criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />

Name & Title of External Advisor<br />

Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />

Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />

The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />

Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />

> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A<br />

> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />

regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />

session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title BEng Electronic Engineering & Telecommunications with<br />

Industrial Experience<br />

Programme Code H692<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Engineering (BEng) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

The proposed programme develops the existing programme BEng Electronic Engineering & Telecommunications by adding an<br />

Industrial Experience year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give students the<br />

opportunity to utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired through the<br />

programme of study. This will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

The Electronic Engineering accredited degrees form a group of programmes with the same broad aims <strong>and</strong> objectives; the<br />

difference being that they address different technical flavours of the broad spectrum of the subject area.<br />

Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives are, therefore, common across the family, but the instantiation of these objectives may make use<br />

of different technical aspects within the family.<br />

Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives describe the differences between the programmes <strong>and</strong> Level-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />

between the BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng degrees.<br />

Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />

At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following abilities:<br />

• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations;<br />

• the ability to apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation;<br />

• the ability to use Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering;<br />

• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software);<br />

• the ability to recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong><br />

software ‘tools’ relevant to that particular issue;<br />

• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />

• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />

• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are made in industry;<br />

• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in society;<br />

<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />

• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong><br />

high-level languages;<br />

• the practical skills needed to implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment;<br />

• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a hardware or software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to<br />

identify faults;<br />

• the design skills needed to synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the<br />

best option from a range of<br />

alternatives), to implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original specification;<br />

• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in particular written information, effectively;<br />

• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic.<br />

Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />

• To emphasise computer systems <strong>and</strong> software;<br />

• To focus in particular on the increasingly important area of artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing.<br />

An industrial placement during the programme supports student learning about the application of Electronic Engineering &<br />

Telecommunications in an organisational context. The aims of the placement year are to:<br />

• Ground the taught components of the programme in practical experience at a scale not possible within the College<br />

• Improve career preparation, giving students a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of future career options, improving their career prospects.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />

practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />

artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing<br />

the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />

the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />

relevant to that particular issue<br />

reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />

synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />

range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />

reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />

apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />

apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />

make a clearer connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages<br />

communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />

identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

4) Programme Structure<br />

The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />

pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />

modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />

Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />

Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />

The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />

Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />

equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />

X<br />

Module Title<br />

Telecommunications & Internet<br />

Fundamentals<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Semester<br />

ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Introduction to Electronic Systems ELE102 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Engineering Mathematics MAE111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Electric & Magnetic Fields ELE210 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Digital Circuit Design ELE202 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Telecoms Systems ELE302 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Digital Systems Design ELE335 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Signals & Systems Theory ELE374 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Electronic Devices & Applications ELE303 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

X Microwave & Optical Transmission ELE366 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />

X BEng Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X Digital Signal Processing ELE503 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Operational Financial Management MAT402 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Microwave Electronics ELE569 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Communication Systems Electronics ELE444 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X Product Development ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X Wireless Networks ELE025 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />

5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />

Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />

achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />

the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />

sources, including The Learning Institute<br />

Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />

introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />

develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />

<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />

students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />

The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />

project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />

hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />

skills.<br />

The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />

evaluation forms (30%).<br />

6) Programme Management<br />

Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />

Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />

Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />

in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />

4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />

falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />

progression.<br />

Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />

established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />

informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />

discussing student feedback.<br />

7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />

In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />

information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />

None<br />

8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />

This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />

The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />

will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />

regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />

between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />

(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />

the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />

times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />

also those available at the University level.<br />

During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />

monitors the placement.<br />

9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />

Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />

None<br />

10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />

List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />

The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.<br />

11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />

If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />

Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />

should also be described in detail.<br />

N/A


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />

Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />

that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

13) External Advisor Comments<br />

Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />

specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />

another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />

appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />

criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />

Name & Title of External Advisor<br />

Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />

Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />

The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />

Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A<br />

> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />

> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />

regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />

session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title Computing & ICT with Industrial Experience<br />

Programme Code II19<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

The proposed programme develops the existing programme BScs(Eng) Computing & ICT by adding an Industrial Experience<br />

year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give students the opportunity to utilise in a<br />

practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired through the programme of study. This<br />

will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

The course will enable students to study cutting edge technologies in the areas of Internet Computing, e-Commerce,<br />

Engineering <strong>and</strong> Communications. Students are given the opportunity to add options from other subject areas such as<br />

languages.<br />

Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />

At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following abilities:<br />

• the ability to appreciate the broad needs of a business<br />

• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations;<br />

• the ability to use Information Communications Technology as a key tool to design “solutions” which will meet business needs<br />

using best practice in terms of software <strong>and</strong> business principles;<br />

• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems;<br />

• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />

• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />

• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are made in industry;<br />

• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in society;<br />

<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />

• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages;<br />

• the practical skills needed to implement software;<br />

• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults;<br />

• the design skills needed to synthesise a design in software from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />

range of alternatives), to implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original specification;<br />

• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in particular written information, effectively;<br />

• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic;<br />

• the skill to manage systems to give corporate advantage to employers.<br />

Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />

• To combine technical aspects of ICT <strong>and</strong> real situations in business, commerce <strong>and</strong> industry, as well as providing a thorough<br />

grounding in key business areas.<br />

An industrial placement during the programme supports student learning about the application of Computing & ICT in an<br />

organisational context. The aims of the placement year are to:<br />

• Ground the taught components of the programme in practical experience at a scale not possible within the College<br />

• Improve career preparation, giving students a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of future career options, improving their career prospects.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />

practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />

the broad needs of a business


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />

the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />

relevant to that particular issue<br />

reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />

synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />

range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />

reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

C 5<br />

C 6<br />

recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />

apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />

apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />

work as part of a team<br />

make a clear connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />

manage time effectively<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />

verify the correct behaviour of a software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults<br />

communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />

identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

4) Programme Structure<br />

The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />

pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />

modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />

Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />

Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />

The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />

Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />

equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />

X<br />

Module Title<br />

Telecommunications & Internet<br />

Fundamentals<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Semester<br />

ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Fundamentals of Management BUS001 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Discrete Techniques for Computing MAE113 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Internet Programming ELE205 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Business Economics BUS017 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Telecoms Systems ELE302 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Software Engineering ELE304 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Accounting for Business BUS006 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Internet Applications ELE404 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Marketing BUS011 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />

X ICT Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X Information Systems Management ELE610 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Fundamentals of Strategy BUS004 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Internet Databases ELE012 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Multimedia Systems ELE006 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X Artificial Intelligence ELE611 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X Human Resource Management BUS014 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />

5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />

Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />

achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />

the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />

sources, including The Learning Institute<br />

Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />

introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />

develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />

<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />

students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />

The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />

project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />

hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />

skills.<br />

The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />

evaluation forms (30%).<br />

No


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

6) Programme Management<br />

Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />

Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />

Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />

College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />

in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />

4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />

falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />

progression.<br />

Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />

established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />

informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />

discussing student feedback.<br />

7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />

In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />

information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />

None<br />

8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />

This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />

The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />

will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />

regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />

between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />

(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />

the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />

times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />

also those available at the University level.<br />

During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />

monitors the placement.<br />

9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />

Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />

None<br />

10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />

List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />

The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />

If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />

Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />

should also be described in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />

Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />

that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

13) External Advisor Comments<br />

Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />

specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />

another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />

appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />

criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />

Name & Title of External Advisor<br />

Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />

Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />

The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />

Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />

> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A<br />

> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />

regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />

session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title Computing & ICT with Business Management with<br />

Industrial Experience<br />

Programme Code INC1<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

The proposed programme develops the existing programme BSc (Eng) Electronic Engineering & ICT with Business Management<br />

by adding an Industrial Experience year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give<br />

students the opportunity to utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired<br />

through the programme of study. This will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

The course will enable students to study cutting edge technologies in the areas of Internet Computing, eCommerce Engineering<br />

<strong>and</strong> Communications. Students are given the opportunity to add options from other subject areas such as languages.<br />

Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />

At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following<br />

abilities:<br />

• the ability to appreciate the broad needs of a business<br />

• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong><br />

unfamiliar situations;<br />

• the ability to use Information Communications Technology as a key tool to<br />

design “solutions” which will meet business needs using best practice in terms<br />

of software <strong>and</strong> business principles;<br />

• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems;<br />

• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />

• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />

• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are<br />

made in industry;<br />

• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in<br />

society;<br />

<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />

• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of<br />

flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages;<br />

• the practical skills needed to implement software;<br />

• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a software<br />

system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults;<br />

• the design skills needed to synthesise a design in software from a specification<br />

(including the choice of the best option from a range of alternatives), to<br />

implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original<br />

specification;<br />

• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in<br />

particular written information, effectively;<br />

• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic;<br />

• the skill to manage systems to give corporate advantage to employers.<br />

Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />

• To combine technical aspects of ICT <strong>and</strong> real situations in business, commerce<br />

<strong>and</strong> industry, as well as providing a thorough grounding in key business areas;<br />

• To provide enhanced business <strong>and</strong> financial skills.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />

practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />

the broad needs of a business<br />

the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />

the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />

relevant to that particular issue<br />

reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />

synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />

range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />

reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

C 5<br />

C 6<br />

recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />

apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />

apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />

ability to work as part of a team<br />

make a clearer connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />

manage time effectively<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />

verify the correct behaviour of a software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults<br />

communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />

identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

D 5<br />

manage systems to give corporate advantage to employers<br />

4) Programme Structure<br />

The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />

pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />

modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />

Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />

Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />

The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />

Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />

equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />

X<br />

Module Title<br />

Telecommunications & Internet<br />

Fundamentals<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Semester<br />

ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Fundamentals of Management BUS001 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Discrete Techniques for Computing MAE113 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />

X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Fundamentals of Web Technology DCS150 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Economics for Business BUS017 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />

X Telecoms Systems ELE302 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Software Engineering ELE304 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Financial Accounting BUS021 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />

X Internet Applications ELE404 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Marketing BUS011 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />

X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />

X Strategy BUS204 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Information Systems Management ELE610 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Coordination <strong>and</strong> Social Dynamics BUS206 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />

X Internet Databases ELE012 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X ICT Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X International Business BUS304 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

X Human Resource Management BUS324 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />

Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />

5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />

Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />

achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />

the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />

sources, including The Learning Institute<br />

Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />

introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />

develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />

<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />

students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />

The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />

project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />

hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />

skills.<br />

The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />

evaluation forms (30%).<br />

No


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

6) Programme Management<br />

Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />

Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />

Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />

College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />

in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />

4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />

falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />

progression.<br />

Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />

established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />

informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />

discussing student feedback.<br />

7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />

In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />

information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />

None<br />

8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />

This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />

The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />

will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />

regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />

between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />

(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />

the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />

times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />

also those available at the University level.<br />

During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />

monitors the placement.<br />

9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />

Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />

None<br />

10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />

List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />

The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />

If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />

Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />

should also be described in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />

Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />

that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />

Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />

13) External Advisor Comments<br />

Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />

specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />

another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />

appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />

criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />

Name & Title of External Advisor<br />

Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />

Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />

The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />

Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />

> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A<br />

> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />

regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Programme Proposal(s)<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

MSc Mathematical Finance (Part1)<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

The programme will be run jointly by the SMS <strong>and</strong> SEF. The<br />

potential pool of applications will be science <strong>and</strong> engineering<br />

graduates. This is different from the masters programmes in<br />

the SEF which are open to economics graduates, thus<br />

avoiding the direct competition between the two Programmes.<br />

SMS will have to recruit staff to deliver the advanced aspects<br />

of mathematical modelling as applied to finance. The<br />

corresponding recruitment plan was submitted by the School<br />

as part of its Autumn 2010 PAR submission.<br />

The proposal is significantly detailed <strong>and</strong> outlines a clear<br />

rationale for exp<strong>and</strong>ing student number in this area. Student<br />

surveys,marketing information <strong>and</strong> employer feedback<br />

areprovided.<br />

If the programme is going to be offered in FT <strong>and</strong> PT mode of<br />

study this should be indicated in the summary information<br />

section of the form.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

Part 1 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 1<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School's planning round submission for this academic<br />

session, a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title MSc in Mathematical Finance<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Master of Science (MSc) Full Time 1 Calendar Year<br />

Proposed Start Date Sept 2012 Is this a closed / restricted programme? No<br />

Anticipated Student Numbers 25-30 students in 2012-13, increasing to 60 in 2013-14; overseas up to 80% of intake<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

G150 Mathematical Modelling<br />

L111 Financial Economics<br />

N321 Investment<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible Cost Centre<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Will the programme be funded by another EC public source?<br />

Will the programme be funded by another source which is not an EC public source?<br />

Online application process required (for postgraduate programmes only)?<br />

No<br />

No<br />

Yes


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

Programme Organiser Prof. Boris Khoruzhenko<br />

UK/EU Tuitition Fee Non-st<strong>and</strong>ard Fee Proposed Non-st<strong>and</strong>ard UK/EU Fee (£) £9,000.00<br />

Overseas Tuition Fee Other (please specify) Proposed Overseas Fee (£) £15,000.00<br />

Non-st<strong>and</strong>ard fees must be approved by the Costing <strong>and</strong> Pricing Group <strong>and</strong> the Fees Office should be notified<br />

when any non-st<strong>and</strong>ard fee is agreed.<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

The School of Mathematical Sciences (SMS) currently offers two PGT programmes: MSc in Mathematics <strong>and</strong> MSc in Astrophysics,<br />

with an annual intake of about 25 students in total. These two programmes are traditional in that they aim at preparing students<br />

for independent study in the subject area. There is not much potential for expansion of these programmes. In contrast, the<br />

School's undergraduate (UG) programme underwent a period of unprecedented growth of intake <strong>and</strong> entry qualifications which<br />

was helped, amongst other factors, by the popularity of the School's UG programmes involving mathematics <strong>and</strong> finance. Last<br />

year, BSc in Mathematics with Finance <strong>and</strong> Accounting, one of ten UG programmes offered by the SMS, accounted for more than<br />

30% of applications. The popularity of the mathematical finance diet of the UG module provision in the SMS goes beyond<br />

specialised study programmes, with more than two-thirds of mathematics undergraduate taking at least one module from this<br />

diet.<br />

The School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance (SEF) operates a very successful <strong>and</strong> popular Masters programmes in finance with an<br />

annual intake of about 300 students in total. The SEF is one of the best Economics departments nationally with an excellent<br />

reputations <strong>and</strong> vast expertise in financial economics.<br />

The aim of this proposal is to capitalise on the popularity of mathematical finance locally <strong>and</strong> nationwide. The proposed<br />

programme will provide a thorough grounding in the core principles of mathematics as applied to finance along with the core<br />

principles of finance. This would open to students a host of career opportunities in the banking sector, public services, industry<br />

<strong>and</strong> commerce that require specialist knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills. It is expected that the proposed programme will be popular thus<br />

enabling the SMS to exp<strong>and</strong> the PGT numbers in accordance with the <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Strategic Plan. It is also expected that the<br />

programme will provide financial underpinning of the SMS growth in terms of its core research activities, as well as additional<br />

significant income for the College.<br />

The programme will be run jointly by the SMS <strong>and</strong> SEF making use of the SEF's reputation <strong>and</strong> expertise in provision of masters<br />

programmes in finance. The SMS will deliver mathematical modelling aspects of the programme (four or five new level 7<br />

modules will have to be developed) whilst the SEF will deliver core aspects of finance by making available their existing level 7<br />

finance modules. The potential pool of applications for the proposed Mathematical Finance programme will be science <strong>and</strong><br />

engineering graduates. This is different from the masters programmes in the SEF which are open to economics graduates, thus<br />

avoiding the direct competition between the two Programmes.<br />

Currently, the SMS does not have expertise to deliver the advanced aspects of mathematical modelling as applied to finance <strong>and</strong><br />

will have to recruit staff for that purpose. The corresponding recruitment plan was submitted by the School as part of its Autumn<br />

2010 PAR submission.<br />

2) Marketing Information<br />

Evidence of student dem<strong>and</strong> for the proposed programme (further guidance <strong>and</strong> information should be sought<br />

from Corporate Affairs). This could include relevant A level trends <strong>and</strong> UCAS or HESA data; relevant UK, EU<br />

<strong>and</strong> international economic data; relevant regional, national or sector-specific data. Consideration should also<br />

be given to whether the market is UK-wide, EU or international (consult International Office).<br />

There is a large dem<strong>and</strong>, UK/EU wide <strong>and</strong> internationally, for MSc courses in Mathematical Finance due to the excellent career<br />

prospects for students. London is one of the world biggest financial centres making it an attractive choice of location for<br />

postgraduate study in finances <strong>and</strong> the location of <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> close to the City makes it a natural place to offer postgraduate<br />

training in this subject area.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

As much as 230 students of our current undergraduate finalists took the first course in mathematical finance. 133 of these<br />

students were surveyed in October 2010. More than 85% of these were interested in working in the finance/banking sector <strong>and</strong><br />

more than 50% of the surveyed students expressed interest in an MSc programme in Mathematical Finance at QMUL should this<br />

be offered. A question on the fee level was also included in the survey. Students were asked where they think <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong><br />

should st<strong>and</strong>. The majority of students indicated a figure between £10K <strong>and</strong> £15K, with mean about £13K.<br />

Following the recent financial crisis, there is a bigger appreciation of the importance of underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the theories underlining<br />

various financial instruments to the point where leading banks offer their employees CPD courses in mathematical finance. This<br />

will filter into the recruitment cycle with a greater dem<strong>and</strong> for new recruits with specialists mathematics knowledge.<br />

3) Competitor Provision (where applicable)<br />

A brief summary including programme titles, length of time programmes have been offered, numbers of<br />

applicants <strong>and</strong> registered students should be included.<br />

MSc in Financial Mathematics/Mathematical Finance are offered by IC, LSE, KCL <strong>and</strong> City (Cass) in London <strong>and</strong> by Oxford,<br />

Warwick, Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, York, Edinburgh, Leicester <strong>and</strong> Exeter outside London. Official data on the number of<br />

applications <strong>and</strong> registered students is not available. There is strong competition but also strong dem<strong>and</strong>. The fee level varies<br />

from £7-10K Home <strong>and</strong> £12-15K Overseas (Exeter, Leeds, Leicester, Edinburgh, Birmingham, Manchester) to £20-24K Home <strong>and</strong><br />

Overseas (LSE, KCL, City, Oxford IC).<br />

4) Employer Feedback<br />

What is the dem<strong>and</strong> for graduates with this/these qualifications? Feedback from employers (named<br />

individuals); Feedback from Professional or Statutory Regulatory Bodies; Comments from leaders in the field<br />

etc. Consult the Careers Service for any relevant data.<br />

The dem<strong>and</strong> for quantitative analysts <strong>and</strong> the likes from the banking industry is very high <strong>and</strong> MSc graduates in Mathematical<br />

Finance have excellent career prospects. For example, a job search at http://www.quantfinancejobs.com/jobs/masters.asp on Jan<br />

7th, 2011, shows 96 jobs offers at masters level upwards. According the feedback from one of graduate recruiters in the finance<br />

sector received by our Careers "... we have a number of risk programmes that students from this course may be interested in<br />

applying for."<br />

5) Prospective, Current <strong>and</strong> Former Students' views<br />

Feedback from prospective, current <strong>and</strong> former students studying or who have studied in cognate areas - via<br />

questionnaire or focus groups.<br />

A questionnaire given to the current undergraduate students registered for 'Introduction to Mathematical Finance'<br />

showed that 21% of them are seriously interested in an MSc in Mathematical Finance should that be offered by QMUL in the<br />

future. The detailed statistics of the student responses are below:<br />

Introduction to Mathematical Finance survey (28 Oct 2010 by Dr Hugo Touchette)<br />

133 responses, the table below shows percentages of responses<br />

Strongly disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree<br />

Question 1 2 3 4 5<br />

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

a) I’m considering doing an MSc in the future 19 13 28 18 22<br />

b) Interested in Financial Maths 17 19 26 24 14<br />

c) Interested in MSc in Financial Maths at QMUL 26 20 33 13 8<br />

d) Interested in working in finance/banking sector 8 5 18 34 35<br />

e) IMF useful for employability 7 2 24 42 24<br />

f) IMF is an easy module 11 27 39 18 5<br />

g) I took IMF to work finance/banking sector 10 15 27 24 24<br />

h) I'll take Further Topics in Mathematical Finance 20 7 19 19 36


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

6) Entry Requirements<br />

Provide the entry requirements for the proposed programme, including the level of English Language<br />

proficiency (IELTS / TOEFL) required for International applicants.<br />

A good degree (at least 2.i or equivalent) in a subject with substantial mathematics component (e.g., Mathematics, Statistics,<br />

Physics, Economics, Computer Science, Engineering).<br />

IELTS/ TOEFL st<strong>and</strong>ard requirements.<br />

7) Programme Description<br />

Provide a programme description for the proposed programme (this will appear in marketing material).<br />

The MSc in Mathematical Finance is a specialist masters programme aiming at providing graduate students <strong>and</strong> professionals<br />

with a rigorous training <strong>and</strong> strong analytical <strong>and</strong> quantitative skills in finance . The intensive programme introduces students to<br />

the mathematics used by the practitioners in the field <strong>and</strong> covers wide range of analytical tools applied in quantitative asset<br />

pricing <strong>and</strong> financial derivatives.<br />

The programme is designed for high caliber science <strong>and</strong> engineering graduates who aim to pursue careers as quantitative<br />

analysts in the private sector, government or financial institutions. Students will learn about financial modelling, asset pricing<br />

theory, <strong>and</strong> financial risk management, as well as more theoretical subjects such as the theory of stochastic processes <strong>and</strong><br />

stochastic analysis. Scientific computing <strong>and</strong> programming is an important element of this programme.<br />

The programme is run jointly by the School of Mathematical Sciences <strong>and</strong> the School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> is offered full<br />

time (one year) <strong>and</strong> part-time (two years). Full time students will take four modules per semester, followed by a 10,000 word<br />

dissertation. There are also two pre-sessional modules in probability & statistics <strong>and</strong> financial markets <strong>and</strong> economics providing a<br />

good opportunity for students to enhance the necessary prerequisite knowledge.<br />

8) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

This programme is designed to prepare science <strong>and</strong> engineering graduates for a quantitative analyst career in the financial <strong>and</strong><br />

banking industry. It also aims to meet regional <strong>and</strong> national need for taught mathematical finance at the postgraduate level. The<br />

programme provides a thorough foundation of mathematical models <strong>and</strong> techniques as applied to finance <strong>and</strong> covers the main<br />

concepts <strong>and</strong> analytical tools of financial engineering including asset pricing <strong>and</strong> financial derivatives. It also provides a wide<br />

range of transferable skills in preparation for career paths in banking, industry, <strong>and</strong> commerce.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

9) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

financial markets <strong>and</strong> institutions<br />

asset valuation, measures of risk <strong>and</strong> portfolio analysis through analytic study<br />

theory <strong>and</strong> practice of pricing <strong>and</strong> hedging derivative securities<br />

mathematics underpinning financial modelling in the context of asset pricing <strong>and</strong> risk management<br />

techniques <strong>and</strong> tools of financial modelling<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

B 5<br />

conduct independent enquiry <strong>and</strong> explain <strong>and</strong> argue conclusions clearly <strong>and</strong> concisely<br />

connect mathematical techniques <strong>and</strong> economic theory <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> apply these to financial modelling <strong>and</strong> risk<br />

analysis<br />

learn <strong>and</strong> synthesise new knowledge relevant to financial modelling<br />

critically evaluate own progress <strong>and</strong> analyse work of others<br />

approach problem solving <strong>and</strong> decision making through analytic study<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

work independently <strong>and</strong> in collaboration with others<br />

use quantitative financial data confidently <strong>and</strong> competently<br />

communicate in a clear <strong>and</strong> effective way <strong>and</strong> use communication technologies competently<br />

engage critically with knowledge<br />

Practical skills - able to:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

D 5<br />

use competently probabilistic models <strong>and</strong> stochastic calculus for pricing derivative securities<br />

give quantitative estimates of risks <strong>and</strong> design an optimal investment portfolio<br />

solve stochastic differential equations<br />

use competently programming languages C <strong>and</strong> C++<br />

perform numerical computations <strong>and</strong> simulations<br />

10) Indicative Curriculum<br />

The indicative curriculum for the proposed programme in terms of proposed modules to be studied in each<br />

academic year of study (which will appear in marketing material 'subject to approval'). Please be clear which<br />

modules are new <strong>and</strong> which modules already exist <strong>and</strong> have been approved.<br />

The study programme consists of 6 core modules <strong>and</strong> two electives with an even split between semesters, <strong>and</strong> a summer<br />

dissertation project. Students will also be offered two pre-sessional modules. Three core mathematics modules, to be developed<br />

by the School of Mathematical Sciences (SMS), will cover the most important mathematical techniques used in mathematical<br />

finance. These modules will have to be approved. Three core economics modules will cover the relevant financial instruments.<br />

These modules already exist <strong>and</strong> are offered within the Masters Programme run by the School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance (SEF).<br />

Two specialist electives in financial mathematics will have to be developed by the SMS, the rest of electives are existing modules<br />

offered by the SMS <strong>and</strong> SEF.<br />

Module Title Credits Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Semester<br />

X Computational Methods in Finance (new, SMS) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 1<br />

X<br />

Foundations of Mathematical Modelling in<br />

Finance (new, SMS)<br />

15 7 Core 1 Semester 1<br />

X ECOM043 Quantitative Asset Pricing (SEF) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 1<br />

X ECOM014 Time Series Analysis (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />

X MTHM736 Mathematical Statistics (SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />

X ECOM050 Investment Management (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />

X MTHM007 Measure Theory <strong>and</strong> Probability (SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />

X<br />

Stochastic Calculus <strong>and</strong> Black Scholes Theory<br />

(new, SMS)<br />

15 7 Core 1 Semester 2<br />

X ECOM044 Advanced Asset Pricing (SEF) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 2


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

X ECOM 026 Financial Derivatives (SEF) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 2<br />

X Advanced Computing in Finance (new, SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />

X ECOM055 Risk Management in Banking (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />

X<br />

Portfolio Theory <strong>and</strong> Risk Management (new,<br />

SMS)<br />

15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />

X MTHM042 Bayesian Statistics (SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />

X MSc Dissertation (10 000 words) 60 7 Core 1 Semester 3<br />

X Pre-sessional Probability <strong>and</strong> Statistics (new, SMS) TBC 7 Study only 1 Semester 1<br />

X<br />

Pre-sessional Financial Instruments <strong>and</strong> Markets<br />

(new, SMS)<br />

TBC 7 Study only 1 Semester 1<br />

X ECOM003 Econometric A (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />

X ECOM025 Financial Econometrics (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />

11) Assessment<br />

Provide a brief outline of the assessment methods for the proposed programme (which will appear in<br />

marketing material 'subject to approval'). Assessment methods should take due consideration of the approved<br />

assessment methods as defined in the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations.<br />

Assessment is by a variety of methods including formal written examinations, in-class tests, coursework of various forms,<br />

presentations, <strong>and</strong> independent dissertation in line with the regulations for projects/dissertations at Masters level.<br />

12) Professional Accreditation<br />

Specify the accrediting body (if applicable) <strong>and</strong> the nature of the accreditation: e.g. qualification to practice,<br />

exemption from professional exams, membership of a profesisonal body).<br />

not applicable<br />

13) Career Opportunities<br />

Specify how this programme may contribute to/enhance students' career prospects. This could include<br />

consideration of how students are supported in exploring their career options (e.g Career Liaison Tutor,<br />

specific personal tutor session, specific careers events, industrial visits, notification of careers events). Consult<br />

the Careers Service for any relevant data.<br />

The programme will prepare students for a wide range of careers, especially in the banking <strong>and</strong> finance sector,<br />

as well as marketing, public services, consultancy, industry <strong>and</strong> commerce. Special tutor sessions on composing CVs <strong>and</strong><br />

projective the positive image during interviews are planned. Also planned are guest lectures by practitioners in the field. The<br />

possibility of industrial visits <strong>and</strong> summer project industry placements will be investigated.<br />

Also the college Careers Office provides<br />

- use of 1-2-1 careers discussions with a career adviser to aid in choosing a career path:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />

- support in job applications <strong>and</strong> PhD applications through the careers service<br />

- in-department careers events, such as employer talks or alumni networking<br />

- notification of all relevant careers events for maths students, for example from 2010: IT & Technology Fair, Focus on Finance<br />

week with talks from city employers <strong>and</strong> networking with alumni working in the finance sector.<br />

Approval of Part 1 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

David<br />

Arrowsmith<br />

Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />

DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />

email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.02.14 12:20:57 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Digitally signed by George Kapetanios<br />

DN: cn=George Kapetanios, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, UoL, ou=School of Economics<br />

<strong>and</strong> Finance,<br />

email=g.kapetanios@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.02.15 10:16:44 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Once a programme has passed Part 1 approval it can now be marketed. In order to publicise a new<br />

programme the School administering the programme (through the programme proposer) should liaise<br />

directly with Corporate Affairs to ensure that all the neccessary information required to market the<br />

programme is provided.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Programme Proposal(s)<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London SMD<br />

MSc Endodontic Practice (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> the following<br />

associated module proposals:<br />

Advanced sciences in relation to Endodotology <strong>and</strong><br />

integrated clinical endodontics<br />

Audit Project in Endodontic Practice<br />

Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology<br />

Clinical skills in Endodontics<br />

Literature Review in relation to Endodontic Practice<br />

Preclinical Endodontic Skills<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

The Board may wish to consider the programme duration in<br />

part-time mode of study for the MSc Endodontic Practice,<br />

which is stated as 3 calendar years.<br />

Support <strong>and</strong> comments from an independent external advisor<br />

are to follow.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />

All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />

proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />

proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />

session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Proposed Programme Title Endodontic Practice<br />

Programme Code<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Master of Science (MSc) Part Time 3 Calendar Years<br />

Postgraduate Diploma (PG Dip) Part Time (Calendar Year) 2 Calendar Years<br />

Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry/Institute o<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

n/a<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

n/a<br />

Programme Organiser Dr Sharan Sidhu<br />

1) Programme Rationale<br />

Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />

include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />

As people live longer they also expect to be able to retain their teeth for longer. Current practice is to save teeth by endodontic<br />

(advanced restorative) treatment wherever possible. There is limited experience in endodontic practice provided in most dental<br />

undergraduate courses which is often insufficient to deal with the many advanced restorative problems encountered in general<br />

dental practice. As a result, a large number of cases that could be treated in the General Dental Services are referred to the Barts<br />

<strong>and</strong> The London Dental Institute, leading to unnecessarily long waiting times <strong>and</strong> a delayed delivery of service. In addition, the<br />

high referral rate for such treatment has given rise to a need for dentists with a special interest in endodontics to provide the<br />

relevant treatment. The course will not only fit within the existing taught postgraduate portfolio of the Institute of Dentistry,


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

emphasising its role as a leading educational provider of postgraduate training in the region, but also help to exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

diversify the recruitment base of the school. The number of applications from current dentists for the Diploma level course<br />

indicates the dem<strong>and</strong> for advanced education <strong>and</strong> training whilst feedback from current students supports the need to offer the<br />

opportunity for the Diploma to be upgraded to Masters level.<br />

This three year part-time programme is uniquely structured to allow dental practitioners to enhance their knowledge <strong>and</strong> clinical<br />

ability in this field, thus offering an appropriate response to national trends. The programme will provide an in-depth approach<br />

for exploring current concepts in clinical endodontics, offering deeper knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the subject, improving<br />

clinical skills <strong>and</strong> leading to increased job satisfaction. It will also facilitate the exposure of each dental practitioner to their peers,<br />

encouraging a synergistic exchange of ideas <strong>and</strong> experience <strong>and</strong> contribute to <strong>and</strong> enhance participants’ career options by<br />

allowing them access to current endodontic concepts <strong>and</strong> research. It can be part of a dentist's Personal Development Plan.<br />

2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />

Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />

This programme aims to:<br />

• meet the local, regional <strong>and</strong> national need for more dentists with a special interest in endodontics<br />

• enhance students' knowledge of advanced aspects of endodontics <strong>and</strong> enable them to apply it to their clinical work<br />

• foster appropriate advanced clinical skills in endodontic practice<br />

• promote a critical approach to evaluating relevant literature so as to be able to establish evidence-based practice in clinical<br />

endodontics<br />

• enhance underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> the impact of clinical governance <strong>and</strong> clinical effectiveness<br />

• encourage the pursuit of independent study <strong>and</strong> audit.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />

SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

The critical review <strong>and</strong> analysis of aspects of endodontic disease <strong>and</strong> its management<br />

The methods of measuring clinical outcomes<br />

The process of undertaking, with critical awareness, analysis of complex, complex, 'cutting edge' or contradictory<br />

areas of clinical <strong>and</strong> scientific knowledge<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Self-reflect on endodontic outcome <strong>and</strong> analysis of research<br />

Evaluate advanced scholarship critically in evidence based endodontic disease, make a case for alternative approaches<br />

<strong>and</strong> explore scientific clinical research in order to be able to audit practice scientific clinical research in order to be able<br />

to audit current practice<br />

Critique <strong>and</strong> evaluate the different approaches to collecting <strong>and</strong> analysing data <strong>and</strong> communicate it coherently


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Appraise <strong>and</strong> investigate cases <strong>and</strong> literature so that an evidence-based approach is undertaken<br />

Recognise cases when referral to tertiary care is required<br />

Promote endodontic treatment as part of comprehensive oral care<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Perform non-surgical endodontic treatment on all teeth<br />

Manage endodontic emergencies <strong>and</strong> dental trauma<br />

Manage the endodontic aspect of multi-disciplinary dental cases<br />

4) Programme Structure<br />

The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />

pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />

modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />

The course will be offered on a part-time basis only, either as a two year postgraduate diploma or a three year MSc. The<br />

postgraduate diploma will consist of 4 x30 credit modules listed below:<br />

• Module 1 Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology: 38 seminars, each of 2 hours' duration<br />

• Module 2 Advanced Sciences in relation to Endodontology: 38 seminars, each of 2 hours' duration<br />

• Module 3 Preclinical Endodontic Skills: 22 pre-clinical laboratory practice sessions of 3 hours each on simulators<br />

• Module 4 Clinical Skills in Endodontics: 24 clinical practice sessions of 3 hours each for patient treatment<br />

Students seeking to upgrade their Diploma to an MSc will complete two further modules listed below:<br />

• Module 5: Audit Project in Endodontic Practice (15 credits)<br />

• Module 6: Literature review in relation to Endodontic Practice (45 credits)<br />

Requirements:<br />

• Attendance at all sessions is compulsory.<br />

• Students will need to read <strong>and</strong> critically review at least 5 essential research papers <strong>and</strong> 5 additional papers of relevance, as<br />

suggested by the course organisers.<br />

• Students will need to demonstrate a satisfactory level of ability by passing a practical test of competence (Gateway Test) before<br />

being allowed to do clinical practice.<br />

• During clinical sessions the student is expected to treat 5 - 7 patients in total, to a satisfactory st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />

The progression threshold mark from the Diploma to the Masters will normally be an average of 60% achieved across Modules<br />

1-4, with no individual module mark being less than 50%.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

X<br />

Module Title<br />

Basic Sciences in relation to<br />

Endodontology<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Semester<br />

30 7 Core 1 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X<br />

Advanced Sciences in relation to<br />

Endodontology<br />

30 7 Core 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X Preclinical Endodontic Skills 30 7 Core 1 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X Clinical Skills in Endodontics 30 7 Core 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X Audit Project in Endodontic Practice 15 7 Core 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

X<br />

Literature review in relation to<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

45 7 Core 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />

5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />

Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />

achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />

the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />

sources, including The Learning Institute<br />

A variety of teaching <strong>and</strong> learning methods will be employed including:<br />

• Formal 2-hour seminars given by experts in their field on topics relevant to the study of Endodontics<br />

• Pre-clinical laboratory practice sessions: demonstrations, “h<strong>and</strong>s-on” practical exercises, discussion of outcomes<br />

• Clinical practice sessions: treating patients under supervision, discussion of outcomes<br />

• Self-directed learning: critical review of at least two scientific papers nominated by the programme organisers <strong>and</strong> at least two<br />

more papers selected by the students themselves<br />

• One–to-one tutorials with those students needing additional guidance<br />

• Case presentations: discussion on what was carried out, how, <strong>and</strong> why it was carried out, reflecting on shortcomings <strong>and</strong> how it<br />

could be improved the next time<br />

• reading lists of books <strong>and</strong> journal papers<br />

Assessment strategies will include:<br />

• Formative assessment: regular informal verbal feedback to individual students regarding their performance <strong>and</strong> achievement of<br />

the learning objectives.<br />

• Assessment of competency: There will be a competency-based Practical Test at the end of the Pre-clinical Laboratory-based<br />

Practice Module. The student must pass this “Gateway Test” before being allowed to progress to the Clinical Practice sessions<br />

treating patients. Those who fail will be required to undertake additional practical sessions before taking the “Gateway Test”<br />

again.<br />

• Summative assessment: assessment of each module by written papers, practical skills tests, essay questions, viva voce, clinical<br />

case reports, literature review report <strong>and</strong> audit presentation.<br />

6) Programme Management<br />

Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />

Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />

Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />

Taught postgraduate programmes in the Institute are co-ordinated through the Masters Course Organisers Group which takes an<br />

overview of all taught postgraduate programmes <strong>and</strong> any issues impacting upon their quality. Progression will be managed<br />

throughthe Subject Examination Board.<br />

- Staff-Student Liaison Committee meetings: There are periodic meetings of the Staff-Student Liaison Committee to give the<br />

No


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

students ample opportunity to raise issues concerning the programme.<br />

- Student feedback mechanisms: Clinical programmes facilitate the provision of two way informal feedback. This process will be<br />

adopted <strong>and</strong> developed throughout the course. Formal feedback will be sought twice-yearly via a st<strong>and</strong>ard questionnaire<br />

adopted for use by the Institute's postgraduate programmes, based on NSS content.<br />

- Personal tutor arrangements: The programme organisers will act as personal tutors to the students.<br />

7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />

In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />

information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />

N/A<br />

8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />

This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />

Programme induction: There will be a formal induction to the programme at the start with the programme organisers <strong>and</strong> the<br />

tutors present, to welcome the students <strong>and</strong> to introduce the various components of the programme. There will also be a tour of<br />

the facilities. In addition to the programme lead who will have oversight of the whole cohort's progression students will also be<br />

assigned a personal tutor for the research element (audit <strong>and</strong> literature review) of the programme.<br />

9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />

Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />

10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />

List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />

Drs Sharan Sidhu, Nectaria Polycarpou <strong>and</strong> R Thomson provide the core academic staff.<br />

11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />

If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />

Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />

should also be described in detail.<br />

N/A


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />

Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />

that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

13) External Advisor Comments<br />

Comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external specialist<br />

opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in another<br />

institution. The external adviser should be able to comment on the appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the<br />

proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection criteria for <strong>and</strong> role of External<br />

Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />

Letter attached from Professor WP Saunders.<br />

Name & Title of External Advisor<br />

Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />

Professor WP Saunders<br />

Dean/Head of Department, University of Dundee Dental School<br />

Address for Correspondence Park Place, Dundee DD1 4HN<br />

Telephone Number 01382 635952 Email Address w.p.saunders@dundee.ac.uk<br />

The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />

Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />

> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? Yes<br />

> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />

regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 14:30:06 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Advanced sciences in relation to Endodotology <strong>and</strong> integrated clinical endodontics<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2012<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2012/13 10 8 10<br />

2013/14 10 8 10<br />

2014/15 10 8 10


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This is a core module designed to ensure that all students have the knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the clinical basis of<br />

endodontics.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Institute of Dentistry:<br />

• Seminar room<br />

• AV facilities<br />

• Library access<br />

• IT facilities <strong>and</strong> support<br />

• USB Memory devices (encrypted)<br />

• Administration support<br />

• External speakers<br />

• 4 members of staff who are specialists in endodontics<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Advanced sciences in relation to Endodotology <strong>and</strong> integrated clinical endodontics<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

Basic Sciences in relation to<br />

Endodontology<br />

n/a<br />

n/a<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the clinical basis of endodontics <strong>and</strong> the interface with other aspects<br />

of dentistry. It will be conducted in the form of 38 seminars of 2 hours duration each, on alternate Wednesdays, covering:<br />

• Advances in pulp therapy<br />

• Outcome of endodontic treatment<br />

• Endodontic surgery<br />

• Inter-relationship of endodontics with periodontics, prosthodontics, orthodontics <strong>and</strong> paedodontics


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

• Adult dental trauma<br />

• Dental resorption<br />

• Odontogenic <strong>and</strong> non-odotogenic pain<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aims of this module are to:<br />

• Develop key learning from the introductory module (Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology)<br />

• Describe <strong>and</strong> discuss the academic aspects of endodontic practice with particular reference to root canal preparation <strong>and</strong><br />

obturation<br />

• Develop this knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing to facilitate appropriate endodontic treatment planning within the context of<br />

overall patient care<br />

• Develop knowledge of the interface between endodontics <strong>and</strong> other clinical dental modalities<br />

• Develop systematic problem solving strategies<br />

• Highlight strengths <strong>and</strong> limitations of available research.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

• The role of endodontics within complex treatment plans <strong>and</strong> other alternative treatment modalities<br />

• The assessment <strong>and</strong> summary of the strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses of the current research literature <strong>and</strong> clinical<br />

guidelines concerning evidence based endodontic practice, such as the Cochrane Library <strong>and</strong> the European<br />

Endodontic guidelines<br />

A 3<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

• Debate <strong>and</strong> analyse recent advances in pulp therapy, including outcomes of endodontic treatment, endodontic<br />

surgery, adult dental trauma, dental resorption <strong>and</strong> odontogenic <strong>and</strong> non-odontogenic pain<br />

• Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current endodontic literature<br />

• Demonstrate a commitment to continuing professional development<br />

Transferable skills - able to:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

• Participate collaboratively with the “classroom” process<br />

• Demonstrate communication skills appropriate to varying levels such as to individual patients, colleague groups <strong>and</strong><br />

conferences<br />

• Select <strong>and</strong> apply appropriate media to support presentations to individual patients, colleagues <strong>and</strong> groups <strong>and</strong><br />

conferences<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

• Apply this theoretical evidence base to both laboratory <strong>and</strong> clinic activity<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

• Pathways of the Pulp<br />

Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Publication date: May 2010<br />

ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />

• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />

Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />

Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />

ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />

• Endodontics<br />

Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />

ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />

• Seltzer <strong>and</strong> Bender’s Dental Pulp<br />

Editors:Kenneth M Hargreaves, Harold E Goodis<br />

Publisher: Quintessence Publishing Co,<br />

Publication date: May 2002<br />

ISBN:9780867154153<br />

• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />

Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />

Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />

Publishing Date: Nov 2007


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Edition: 2nd Edition<br />

ISBN: 1405149760<br />

• Roane J.B., Sabala C.L. <strong>and</strong> Duncanson M.G. (1985): The balanced force concept for instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of<br />

Endodontics 11: 203-211.<br />

• Saunders WP, Saunders EM. (1994) Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the<br />

modified double-flared technique. Journal of Endodontics 20(9):440-4.<br />

• Pettiette MT et al (2001) Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless steel K-files<br />

<strong>and</strong> nickel titanium h<strong>and</strong> files. Journal of Endodontics 27: 124-127.<br />

• Lumley, P (2000) Cleaning efficiency of two apical preparation regimens following shaping with h<strong>and</strong> file of greater taper.<br />

International Endodontic Journal 33:262-5<br />

• Lussi A. et al (1993) A novel non-instrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system. Journal of Endodontics 19<br />

(11):549-53<br />

• Glosson C R et al (1995) A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti h<strong>and</strong>, Ni-Ti engine-driven <strong>and</strong> K-Flex endodontic<br />

instruments. Journal of Endodontics 21(3) P.146-151<br />

• Saunders E.M. (1990) In vivo findings associated with heat generation during thermomechanical compaction of Gutta Percha.<br />

Part 1 - Temperature levels at the external surface of the root. International Endodontic Journal 23(5): 263-267.<br />

Part 2 - Histological response to temperature elevation on the external surface of the root. International Endodontic Journal 13(5):<br />

268-274.<br />

• Buchanan LS (1998) Continuous wave of condensation technique. Endodontic Practice 1: 7-10<br />

• Friedman S, Stabholz A <strong>and</strong> Tamse A (1990) Endodontic retreatment - case selection <strong>and</strong> technique Part 3. Retreatment<br />

techniques. Journal of Endodontics 16 543-549.<br />

• Peterson J, Gutmann JL (2001) The outcome of endodontic resurgery: a systemic review. I International Endodontic Journal 34:<br />

169-175.<br />

• Walton R, Fouad A (1992) Endodontic inter-appointment flare-ups: a prospective study of incidence <strong>and</strong> related factors. Journal<br />

of Endodontics 18 (4) : 172 - 7. 7.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

76 hours student seminars<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

228 hours independent student study hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

304 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

4 literature reviews with given<br />

titles<br />

Written paper (A choice of 3<br />

questions out of 4)<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Coursework 2,000 words each 60% No n/a<br />

Examination 2.5 hours 40% Yes n/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 14:24:14 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Audit Project in Endodontic Practice<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2013/14 10 8 10<br />

2014/15 10 8 10<br />

2015/16 10 8 10


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This core module aims to build on students’ basic undergraduate competencies in clinical audit to a managerial level of audit<br />

skills. Students will have the opportunity of learning how clinical audit fits into the wider issue of clinical governance which is a<br />

key component of the NHS framework. In this core module of the Master of Science in Endodontic Practice, students will progress<br />

from underst<strong>and</strong>ing the key components of clinical audit to its role in the process of quality improvement to enhance patient<br />

care <strong>and</strong> outcomes. The purpose of the audit project is to provide an opportunity to investigate current practice in a chosen area<br />

of endodontic practice. The audit project will not only give the student real insight into the philosophy of audit but also the<br />

practical experience in managing the process of completing a piece of original work.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Access to classroom facilities <strong>and</strong> supervisors, library facilities <strong>and</strong> librarian<br />

support, audio-visual support for preparing <strong>and</strong> giving presentations<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Audit Project in Endodontic Practice<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

n/a n/a n/a<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

In this module, students will build on the principles of audit <strong>and</strong> clinical governance using current norms <strong>and</strong> protocols. The<br />

students will select an area of clinical endodontic practice, design a strategy for audit, collect the relevant data <strong>and</strong> analyse the<br />

findings. At the end of this module, the students will be required to produce a structured audit report of their project (minimum<br />

of 2,000 words), including recommendations for improvement of the clinical service <strong>and</strong> plans for re-audit. They will also be<br />

required to summarise their project in a PowerPoint presentation of 10-15 minutes’ duration, at a local, national or international<br />

meeting in endodontology or restorative dentistry. It is intended that the students will be guided throughout this process.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The audit project represents the culmination of the programme <strong>and</strong>, in line with the QMUL <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework Level 7<br />

expectations, with the aims to:<br />

• Enhance the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of clinical governance <strong>and</strong> clinical audit<br />

• Develop the ability to highlight problems in clinical service<br />

• Investigate current practice in a chosen area of endodontics<br />

• Develop skills in conducting a successful audit project<br />

• To carry out independent learning <strong>and</strong> problem-solving<br />

• Use clinical audit to ensure that clinical st<strong>and</strong>ards are being met to improve patient care<br />

• Improve team working <strong>and</strong> communication<br />

• Develop skills in oral <strong>and</strong> written presentations.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

• The importance of clinical audit <strong>and</strong> its different stages<br />

• The process of problem identification in clinical service <strong>and</strong> the setting of st<strong>and</strong>ard criteria<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

• Evaluate the evidence available on an aspect of endodontic practice by critical appraisal of the relevant scientific <strong>and</strong><br />

clinical literature<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

•Develop a systematic approach to the process of data collection <strong>and</strong> analysis<br />

• Present a report which provides insight into an audited aspect of endodontic practice<br />

• Demonstrate team working <strong>and</strong> communication


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

C 4<br />

• Self-reflection leading to the identification of training needs <strong>and</strong> personal strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

• Design an audit protocol <strong>and</strong> implement the audit to provide information about the effectiveness of a clinical service<br />

• Give effective oral presentations<br />

• Promote good clinical practice leading to the improvement of patient care<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Clinical Audit for Doctors 2009, Robert Ghosh<br />

http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/Documents/501/Practical_Clinical_Audit_H<strong>and</strong>book_v1_1.pdf<br />

A Practical H<strong>and</strong>book for Clinical Audit, Guidance published by the Clinical Governance Support Team. Graham Copel<strong>and</strong>.<br />

http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/clinauditChap1.pdf<br />

Clinical audit: what it is <strong>and</strong> what it isn’t


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

No more than 30 hours student supervision<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

At least 120 hours independent student study<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Written report Dissertation 2,000 words 60% Yes n/a<br />

Presentation of the project <strong>and</strong><br />

summary of the project as an<br />

interim assessment<br />

Coursework 30 minutes 20% No n/a<br />

Viva on audit project Coursework 30 minutes 20% Yes n/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 14:26:02 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 8 10<br />

2012/13 10 8 10<br />

2013/14 10 8 10


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This is a core module designed to ensure that all students have the knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the scientific basis of<br />

endodontolgy <strong>and</strong> the principles underpinning endodontic therapy.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Institute of Dentistry:<br />

• Seminar room<br />

• AV facilities<br />

• Library access<br />

• IT facilities <strong>and</strong> support<br />

• USB Memory devices (encrypted)<br />

• Administration support<br />

• External speakers<br />

• 4 members of staff who are specialists in endodontics<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

n/a n/a n/a<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the basic science of endodontology. It will be conducted in the form<br />

of 38 sessions of 2 hours duration each, on alternate Wednesdays, covering:<br />

• Critical reading of literature<br />

• Diagnosis of pulpal <strong>and</strong> periapical disease<br />

• Access in relation to root canal anatomy <strong>and</strong> morphology<br />

• Endodontic instrumentation: rationale <strong>and</strong> techniques


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

• Obturation of the root canal system: rationale <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />

• Acute endodontic problems<br />

• Root canal re-treatment: rationale <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aims of this course module are to:<br />

• Reinforce the science associated with the pulp <strong>and</strong> periapical tissues<br />

• Develop a deeper underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the knowledge of the science associated with pulpal <strong>and</strong> periapical disease, scientific<br />

background of endodontics <strong>and</strong> the principles associated with endodontic treatment<br />

• Upgrade contemporary philosophies <strong>and</strong> research relating to endodontic treatment<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

• The anatomy of the pulp-dentinal complex <strong>and</strong> periapical tissues during health <strong>and</strong> disease<br />

• The various pathological processes, their impact on the pulpal <strong>and</strong> periapical tissues <strong>and</strong> the implications for<br />

endodontic treatment<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

• Evaluate <strong>and</strong> discuss the importance of evidence based dentistry<br />

• Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current endodontic literature<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

• Demonstrate collaborative communication principles at appropriate levels for various audiences (Lay <strong>and</strong><br />

professional)<br />

• Demonstrate skills of systematic analysis, synthesis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of their own research or advanced<br />

scholarship.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

• Employ appropriate media to support group presentations<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

• Pathways of the Pulp<br />

Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Publication date: May 2010<br />

ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />

• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />

Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />

Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />

ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />

• Endodontics<br />

Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />

ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />

• Seltzer <strong>and</strong> Bender’s Dental Pulp<br />

Editors:Kenneth M Hargreaves, Harold E Goodis<br />

Publisher: Quintessence Publishing Co,<br />

Publication date: May 2002<br />

ISBN:9780867154153<br />

• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />

Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />

Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />

Publishing Date: Nov 2007<br />

Edition: 2nd Edition<br />

ISBN: 1405149760<br />

• Oral Histology: Development, Structure, <strong>and</strong> Function<br />

Authors: Ten Cate AR.<br />

Publisher: Saint Louis: Mosby-Year Book<br />

Publishing Date: 1998<br />

Edition: 5th Edition<br />

ISBN 0-8151-2952-1.<br />

• Peters OA, Laib A, Ruegsegger P, Barbakow F (2000) Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution<br />

computed microtomography. Journal of Dental Research 79(6): 1405-1409.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

• Vertucci FJ (2005) Root canal morphology <strong>and</strong> its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic Topics 10: 3-29<br />

• Dummer PMH, McGinn JH, Rees DG (1984) The position <strong>and</strong> topography of the apical canal constriction <strong>and</strong> apical foramen.<br />

International Endodontic Journal 17(4): 192-198<br />

• Klevant FJH, Eggink CO (1983) The effect of canal preparation on periapical disease. International Endodontic Journal 68-75.<br />

• Bystrom A <strong>and</strong> Sundqvist G (1981) Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in<br />

endodontic therapy. Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian Journal of Dental Research 89 321-328.<br />

• Bystrom A <strong>and</strong> Sundqvist G (1983) Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5% NaoCl in endodontic therapy. Oral Surgery 55(3)<br />

307-312.<br />

• Bystrom A <strong>and</strong> Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial actions of sodium hypochlorite <strong>and</strong> EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic<br />

therapy. International Endodontic Journal 18 35-40.<br />

• Nair PNR, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J (2005) Microbial status of apical root canal system of human m<strong>and</strong>ibular first molars with<br />

primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral surgery,Oral medicine, Oral Pathology,Oral Radiology<br />

<strong>and</strong> Endodontology 99, 231-52<br />

• Kakehashi S, Stanley HR <strong>and</strong> Fitzgerald RJ (1965) The effects of surgical exposures<br />

dental pulps in germ free <strong>and</strong> conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surgery 20(3); 340-349.<br />

• Stashenko S, Teles R, D’Souza R (1998) Periapical inflammatory responses <strong>and</strong> their modulation. Critical Review of Oral Biology<br />

<strong>and</strong> Medicine 9 (4), 498-521.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

76 hours student seminars<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

228 hours independent student study hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

304 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

6 Timed essays with given titles Coursework 1 hour each 40% No n/a<br />

Written paper (A choice of 3<br />

questions out of 4)<br />

Examination 2.5 hours 60% Yes n/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 14:27:26 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Clinical skills in Endodontics<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2012<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2012/13 10 8 10<br />

2013/14 10 8 10<br />

2014/15 10 8 10


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This is a core module to give students exposure to a wide range of clinical cases including diagnosis, treatment planning,<br />

endodontic management <strong>and</strong> trouble-shooting.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Institute of Dentistry:<br />

• 5 fully operational dental chairs/bays<br />

• Materials <strong>and</strong> equipment as required<br />

• Nursing (4 nurses per clinic session)<br />

• administrative support for the course <strong>and</strong> clinics<br />

• testing <strong>and</strong> maintenance of equipment<br />

• 4 specialist endodontists for appropriate of clinical supervision <strong>and</strong> expertise<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Clinical skills in Endodontics<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

Preclinical Endodontic Skills n/a n/a<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This core module comprises of 25 clinical sessions of 4 hours duration each, allowing for 2 hours per patient resulting in<br />

treatment of approximately 8-10 patients in total by the end of this component.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aims of this module are to:<br />

• Develop clinical experience in the comprehensive management of patients including diagnosis, vital pulp therapy, non-surgical<br />

root canal treatment <strong>and</strong> re-treatment, non-vital bleaching <strong>and</strong> procedures related to coronal restorations by means of post <strong>and</strong>/<br />

or cores involving the root canal space<br />

• Encourage discussion of cases with the relevant supervising staff prior to the clinical session to devise a plan of treatment for<br />

that session<br />

• Encourage problem identification <strong>and</strong> solving<br />

• Encourage a team approach by working in pairs to assist each other, to maximise learning potential <strong>and</strong> to generate discussion<br />

on a broader range of ideas<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

• The analyis <strong>and</strong> review of clinical governance measures <strong>and</strong> methods of quality of care assurance<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

• Reflect upon <strong>and</strong> organise the practical skills gained in the laboratory for application to clinical situations<br />

• Recognise the need to identify instances where multidisciplinary planning <strong>and</strong> management of treatment is<br />

indicated so that clinical endodontic skills are provided within comprehensive oral care<br />

• Demonstrate self-awareness of <strong>and</strong> limits of personal expertise <strong>and</strong> when to seek support <strong>and</strong> advice from<br />

specialists, such as referral to a secondary/tertiary care centre (e.g. Barts & The London)<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

• Appreciate ethical dilemmas in treatment planning <strong>and</strong> evaluating alternative treatment approaches<br />

• Display professional attributes in relationships with patients <strong>and</strong> colleagues


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

• Demonstrate <strong>and</strong> apply sound, evidence based diagnostic <strong>and</strong> treatment planning skills to the provision of<br />

treatment plans <strong>and</strong> clinical care provided precisely <strong>and</strong> effectively<br />

• Provide patient based descriptions of root canal treatment <strong>and</strong> its range of outcomes<br />

• Assess an individual patient's tooth prognosis <strong>and</strong> strategic significance given local <strong>and</strong> systemic factors<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

• Pathways of the Pulp<br />

Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Publication date: May 2010<br />

ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />

• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />

Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />

Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />

ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />

• Endodontics<br />

Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />

ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />

• Seltzer <strong>and</strong> Bender’s Dental Pulp<br />

Editors:Kenneth M Hargreaves, Harold E Goodis<br />

Publisher: Quintessence Publishing Co,<br />

Publication date: May 2002<br />

ISBN:9780867154153<br />

• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />

Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />

Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />

Publishing Date: Nov 2007<br />

Edition: 2nd Edition<br />

ISBN: 1405149760<br />

• Harty’s Endodontics in clinical practice<br />

Edited by: T R Pitt Ford<br />

Publisher: Wright (Elsevier science)<br />

Publishing Date: 2004<br />

Edition: , 5th edition<br />

ISBN: 0723610894


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

• Textbook <strong>and</strong> color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth<br />

Edited by: J O Andreasen, Frances M Andreasen, Lars Andersson<br />

Publisher: Wiley Blackwell<br />

Publishing Date: May 2007<br />

Edition:5tthedition<br />

ISBN: 978-1-4051-2954-1<br />

• Color atlas of microsurgery in endodontics,<br />

Author: Syngcuk Kim , Gabriele Pecora, Richard A. Rubinstein<br />

Publisher:Saunders Company, W. B.<br />

Publishing date 2001<br />

Edition: 1st edition<br />

ISBN: 0-7216-4851-7<br />

• Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. I. Fractures <strong>and</strong> luxations of permanent teeth.Flores MT, Andersson<br />

L, Andreasen JO, Bakl<strong>and</strong> LK, Malmgren B, Barnett F, Bourguignon C, DiAngelis A, Hicks L, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Tsukiboshi M,<br />

von Arx T; International Association of Dental Traumatology.Dental Traumatology 2007 Apr;23(2):66-71<br />

• Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. II. Avulsion of permanent teeth.<br />

Flores MT, Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Bakl<strong>and</strong> LK, Malmgren B, Barnett F, Bourguignon C, DiAngelis A, Hicks L, Sigurdsson A,<br />

Trope M, Tsukiboshi M, von Arx T; International Association of Dental Traumatology..Dental Traumatology. 2007 Jun;23(3):130-6<br />

• Wesselink PR (2000) Pulp capping with adhesive resin-based composite vs. calcium hydroxide: a review. Endodontics <strong>and</strong> Dental<br />

Traumatology 16: 240-50.<br />

• Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K..International<br />

Endodontic Journal. 2008 Dec;41(12):1026-46. Review.<br />

• Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on<br />

probability of success.Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K.. International Endodontic Journal. 2007 Dec;40<br />

(12):921-39.<br />

• Carnevale G, Pontoriero R, Febo G (1998) Long-term effects of resective therapy in furcation involved molars. Clinical<br />

Periodontology. 25, 209-14.<br />

• Hamilton RS, Gutman JL (1999) Endodontic - orthodontic relationships: a review of intergrated treatment planning challenges.<br />

International Endodontic Journal 32, 343-360.<br />

• Sjogren U, Hagglund, Sundqvist G <strong>and</strong> Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. Journal of<br />

Endodontics 16: 498-504.<br />

• Cvek M. <strong>and</strong> Lundberg M.:(1983) Histological Appearance of pulps after exposure by a crown fracture, partial pulpotomy <strong>and</strong><br />

clinical diagnosis of healing. J. Endo. 9: 8-11 . 6.<br />

• Nayyar A, Walton RE & Leonard LA (1980) An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel <strong>and</strong> core technique for endodontically treated<br />

posterior teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 43(5): 511-515.<br />

• Sorensen J <strong>and</strong> Engelman MJ (1990) Ferrule design <strong>and</strong> fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic<br />

Dentistry 63(5): 529-535.<br />

• Ray HA, Trope M (1995) Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling <strong>and</strong><br />

the coronal restoration. International Endodontic Journal 28: 12-18.<br />

• Saunders WP, Saunders EM (1994) Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root canal therapy. A review. Endodontics <strong>and</strong> Dental<br />

Traumatology 10: 105-108.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

• Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT (1985) Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 53: 631-636.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

100 hours supervised student clinical work<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

200 hours independent student study hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

300 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Patient case report Coursework 2,000 words 30% No n/a<br />

Patient case report viva Examination 30 minutes 20% Yes n/a<br />

Unseen case (simulated) Examination 30 minutes 30% Yes n/a<br />

Logbook of all patient cases Coursework Over 1 year 20% No n/a


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 14:28:36 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Literature Review in relation to Endodontic Practice<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 45 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2013/14 10 8 10<br />

2014/15 10 8 10<br />

2015/16 10 8 10


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This is a core module of the Master of Science in Endodontic Practice offered by the Institute of Dentistry. Critical appraisal of the<br />

literature is a fundamental skill necessary for clinicians to practice evidence-based dentistry <strong>and</strong> for those who are interested in<br />

conducting research in their future careers. In this module, the students will build on their competencies in searching, evaluating<br />

<strong>and</strong> critically appraising the scientific literature to identify weaknesses <strong>and</strong> strengths as well as contrasting the views of different<br />

authors. This will be with particular reference to the literature in a selected relevant aspect of the subject. At the end of this<br />

module, students will be required to produce a well-structured, unbiased <strong>and</strong> comprehensive literature review of current<br />

knowledge in the chosen area with the use of appropriate references. The purpose of the report is to provide an opportunity to<br />

investigate current practice in a chosen area of endodontics. The formulation of the report will encourage independent learning,<br />

an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of experimental methods <strong>and</strong> data interpretation, as well as enhance critical thinking <strong>and</strong> writing skills. It will<br />

provide practical experience in the process of completing a piece of original work, for possible publication or conference<br />

presentation.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Access to classroom facilities <strong>and</strong> supervisors, library facilities <strong>and</strong> librarian<br />

support<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Literature Review in relation to Endodontic Practice<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 45 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

n/a n/a n/a<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

In this module, the students will build on skills in conducting a detailed literature search <strong>and</strong> critical appraisal of the literature. It is<br />

intended that the subject for the report will be chosen by the students in a topic relevant to endodontic practice <strong>and</strong> is approved<br />

by the programme coordinator <strong>and</strong>/or a supervisory member of the academic or clinical staff at the institution. The students will<br />

be supported, advised <strong>and</strong> supervised throughout this module by a named supervisor. Guidance will be provided through<br />

tutorials <strong>and</strong> seminars, <strong>and</strong> presentations at journal club meetings. Students will be required to make a short presentation of the<br />

project in the course of the module as an interim assessment. At the end of this module, students will be required to use<br />

appropriate references to produce a well-structured, unbiased <strong>and</strong> comprehensive literature review report of no less than 10,000<br />

words.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The broad aims of this module are to:<br />

• Develop enhanced skills in conducting a detailed library-based research of the literature in a subject relevant to endodontic<br />

practice<br />

• Foster independent learning <strong>and</strong> problem-solving<br />

• Enhance underst<strong>and</strong>ing of experimental methods <strong>and</strong> data interpretation<br />

• Build on the ability to critically appraise the scientific <strong>and</strong> clinical literature in endodontic practice<br />

• Enhance the students’ ability to use the literature to support independent clinical practice by comparing <strong>and</strong> contrasting the<br />

views of different authors to arrive at an independent <strong>and</strong> unbiased conclusion<br />

• Reinforce writing skills <strong>and</strong> presentation skills<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

• the current literature on a topic within clinical endodontics<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

• Evaluate the evidence available on an aspect of endodontic practice by critical appraisal of the relevant scientific <strong>and</strong><br />

clinical literature<br />

• Synthesise information <strong>and</strong> rank the clinical evidence that is available<br />

• Present a clear, coherent, unbiased summary, discussion <strong>and</strong> conclusion of the current literature on a clinical<br />

endodontics topic<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

• Employ appropriate tools (search engines, web-based libraries, electronic documents etc) to conduct a detailed<br />

literature search<br />

• Present a well-written <strong>and</strong> reasoned report which provides an insight into the literature available in the selected<br />

topic<br />

• Work autonomously in planning <strong>and</strong> executing tasks at a professional level


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

• Give effective oral presentations<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine 2006 Wiley-Blackwell<br />

• Sackett D et al. Evidence Based Medicine: How to practice <strong>and</strong> teach EBM. 2000. Churchill-Livingstone.<br />

• Hall GM. How to Write a <strong>Paper</strong>. 3rd Edition. 2003. Wiley Blackwell.<br />

• Journal of Evidence-based Dentistry. Nature communication.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

No more than 50 hours student supervision activity<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

No less than 400 hours independent student study<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

450 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Written report Dissertation 10,000 words 60% Yes n/a<br />

Coursework- assessment of<br />

presentations of two papers at<br />

journal club meetings<br />

Project presentation <strong>and</strong> content<br />

summary - an interim<br />

assessment<br />

Coursework 1 hour 20% No n/a<br />

Coursework 30 minutes 10% No n/a<br />

Viva Coursework 30 minutes 10% Yes n/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 14:29:20 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Preclinical endodontic skills<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Endodontic Practice<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 8 10<br />

2012/13 10 8 10<br />

2013/14 10 8 10


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This is a coremodule to ensure that all students are competent in the practical skills necessary in carrying out endodontic<br />

treatment <strong>and</strong> managing endodontic problems.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Institute of Dentistry:<br />

• Postgraduate preclinical skills laboratory<br />

• Maintenance of supply of teaching materials<br />

• Maintenance <strong>and</strong> testing of relevant equipment<br />

• AV equipment<br />

• Support staff to manage <strong>and</strong> maintain the teaching laboratory<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Preclinical endodontic skills<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

n/a n/a n/a<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module is a practical module essential for the development of the skills required for competency in endodontic techniques.<br />

Students will need to demonstrate satisfactory completion of this module as a pre-requisite for the clinical module which follows<br />

this module. This component comprises of 50 sessions of 2 hours duration each, on alternate Wednesdays, covering:<br />

• endodontic techniques in a simulated root canal in a plastic block<br />

• endodontic techniques on extracted teeth.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aims of this module are to:<br />

• Describe the principles of endodontic instrumentation <strong>and</strong> obturation<br />

• Demonstrate rationales for using various instruments, techniques <strong>and</strong> materials<br />

• Develop reflective tools to evaluate personal performance <strong>and</strong> identify ways of improvement<br />

• Reflect the current evidence base <strong>and</strong> principles in technical aspects of endodontics<br />

• Describe <strong>and</strong> discuss options <strong>and</strong> approaches to managing technical difficulties in endodontics<br />

• Identify operative techniques most appropriate to each patient<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

• Methodologies for root canal preparation <strong>and</strong> obturation<br />

• Problem solving approaches to negotiating the complex anatomy of the root canal system, recognising the need for<br />

adaption of approaches to particular clinical situations <strong>and</strong> individual patient anatomy<br />

A 3<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

• Deliberate <strong>and</strong> resolve commonly occurring clinical problems<br />

• Critically evaluate their technical progress<br />

• Review <strong>and</strong> judge clinical evidence according to the quality of evidence.<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

• Adopt problem solving approaches<br />

• Assess their personal skills development, acknowledging the need for continued practical skills development


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

C 3<br />

• Recognise their own scope of practice <strong>and</strong> the need for supervisory support<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

• Identify <strong>and</strong> evaluate materials <strong>and</strong> equipment used for endodontic treatment<br />

• Consistently <strong>and</strong> competently practice safe, effective practical endodontic techniques applying as appropriate a<br />

range of manual (stainless steel/nickel titanium) <strong>and</strong> automated (stainless steel/nickel titanium) instruments for<br />

preparation of the root canal<br />

• Achieve consistency <strong>and</strong> competency in obturation of prepared curved canals using cold lateral condensation <strong>and</strong><br />

warm vertical compaction<br />

• Demonstrate the skills of being able to assess <strong>and</strong> carry out root canal re-treatment cases<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

• Pathways of the Pulp<br />

Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Publication date: May 2010<br />

ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />

• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />

Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />

Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />

ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />

• Endodontics<br />

Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />

Publisher: Mosby<br />

Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />

Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />

ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />

• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />

Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />

Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />

Publishing Date: Nov 2007<br />

Edition: 2nd Edition<br />

ISBN: 1405149760<br />

• Harty’s Endodontics in clinical practice<br />

Edited by: T R Pitt Ford<br />

Publisher: Wright (Elsevier science)<br />

Publishing Date: 2004


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Edition: , 5th edition<br />

ISBN: 0723610894<br />

• Weine F.S., Kelly R.F., Lio P.J.: The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape <strong>and</strong> on apical foramen shape. Journal<br />

of Endodontics 1(8): 255-262<br />

• Mullaney T.P. (1979): Instrumentation of finely curved canals. Dental Clinics of North America. 12: 575-592.<br />

• Goerig A.C., Michelich R.J. <strong>and</strong> Shultz H.H (1982): Instrumentation of root canals in molar using the step down technique. Journal<br />

of Endodontics 8(12): 550-554.<br />

• Roane J.B., Sabala C.L. <strong>and</strong> Duncanson M.G. (1985): The balanced force concept for instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of<br />

Endodontics 11: 203-211.<br />

• Schilder H (1967): Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dental Clinics of North America. 723-744.<br />

• Yared GM <strong>and</strong> Dagher FEB (1994) Influence of apical enlargement on bacterial infection during treatment of apical periodontitis.<br />

Journal of Endodontics 20 (11) 535-537.<br />

• Coldero LG, McHugh S, MacKenzie D, Saunders WP (2002) Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with<br />

<strong>and</strong> without apical enlargement. International Endodontic Journal 35, 437-446.<br />

• Dummer P.M.H. (1992): Quality of root fillings in teeth obturated by lateral condensation of Gutta Percha or Thermafil<br />

obturators. International Endodontic Journal 25(1): 34.<br />

• Lussi A et al (2002) In vivo performance of the new non-instrumentation technology (NIT) canal obturation. International<br />

Endodontic Journal 35: 352<br />

• Siqueira J et al (1999) Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population of the root canal by 3 intstrumentation techniques.<br />

Journal of Endodontics 25: 332-335


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

100 hours supervised student laboratory work<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

200 hours independent student study hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

300 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Practical test (de novo) Practical 3 hours 50% Yes n/a<br />

Practical test (retreatment) Practical 3 hours 50% Yes n/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 14:30:50 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Programme Amendment(s)<br />

School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />

Programme Amendments:<br />

BSc Zoology with Aquatic Biology (C3C1) – resubmission<br />

BSc Zoology (C300) – resubmission<br />

BSc Psychology (C800) - resubmission<br />

Associated new Modules:<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Advanced Aquatic Biology – resubmission<br />

The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> the Origins or Morality<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

Three programme amendments :C3C1, C300 <strong>and</strong> C100 <strong>and</strong><br />

one associated module Advanced Aquatic Biology have been<br />

resubmitted following concerns raised by some students at<br />

the February PMAB meeting, in relation to the withdrawal of<br />

two modules (Freshwater Biology <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />

Science, Policy Management) to be replaced by Advanced<br />

Aquatic Biology. The Programme amendment <strong>and</strong> the<br />

associate new Module have been significantly revised to<br />

address the issues raised by incorporating material from the<br />

withdrawn modules into SBC212 <strong>and</strong> into the new Advanced<br />

Aquatic Biology one. A meeting with students was organised<br />

by the Programme Director to discuss the proposed changes<br />

<strong>and</strong> the External Examiner was also consulted. Learning<br />

Outcomes have also been improved <strong>and</strong> updated programme<br />

specifications have been provided.<br />

BSc Zoology with Aquatic Biology (C3C1)<br />

The proposed amendment date is specified as September<br />

2010. This requires clarification.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

Programme Amendment Form<br />

This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />

the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />

• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />

necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />

• change in the length of the programme of study<br />

• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />

• changes in the programme regulations<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />

Programme Title(s) Zoology with Aquatic Biology<br />

Programme Code(s) C3C1<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />

Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Dr Jonathan Grey<br />

1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />

modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />

specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />

programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />

in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />

All modules in Level 5 will become compulsory.<br />

At Level 6, the following changes will be made:<br />

SBC316 Freshwater Biology will be withdrawn (withdrawal form submitted);<br />

SBC314 Aquatic Ecosystems: Science Policy & Management will be withdrawn from this programme;<br />

SBC611 Population & Chromosome Genetics, <strong>and</strong> SBS205 Parasites & Infectious Disease will be offered as elective modules;<br />

A new module SBC--- Advanced Aquatic Biology will be added to this programme (proposal form submitted);


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

SBS074 Investigative Project will be replaced by a new module SBS--- Aquatic Biology Investigative Project (proposal form<br />

submitted);<br />

SBS414 Zoology Research Project will be replaced by a new module SBS--- Aquatic Biology Research Project (proposal form<br />

submitted);<br />

If students do not elect to take the new Aquatic Biology Research Project, they must take SBC408 Turtles, Seals, Whales &<br />

Dolphins.<br />

SBS206 Project Skills in the Life Sciences will be removed as a level 6 elective.<br />

X<br />

Module Title<br />

Aquatic Biology Investigative<br />

Project<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

SBC---<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Add / Remove<br />

Module from<br />

Programme<br />

15 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />

X Aquatic Biology Research Project SBC--- 30 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />

X Advanced Aquatic Biology SBC--- 15 6 Compulsory 3 Add Module<br />

X Freshwater Biology SBC316 15 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />

X<br />

Aquatic Ecosystems: Science Policy<br />

& Management<br />

SBC314<br />

15 6 Compulsory 3 Remove Module<br />

X Population & Chromosome Genetics SBC611 15 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />

X Parasites & Infectious Disease SBS205 15 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />

X Investigative Project SBS074 15 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />

X Zoology Research Project SBS414 30 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />

X Project Skills in the Life Sciences SBS206 30 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />

2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />

Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />

3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2010<br />

4) Rationale<br />

Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />

Due to a decline in student numbers, some programmes in the environmental area have now been withdrawn.<br />

In order to consolidate <strong>and</strong> increase teaching efficiency, material previously taught in SBC308 (module already withdrawn) <strong>and</strong><br />

SBC316/SBC314 has already been incorporated into SBC212 <strong>and</strong> will be merged further into the new module Advanced Aquatic<br />

Biology.<br />

The merger will also make better use of the field course facilities.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

The addition of projects in Aquatic Biology will be more appropriate for this programme of study.<br />

5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />

Usual teaching resources required, i.e. lecture rooms, teaching laboratories, computer rooms.<br />

6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />

proposed amendment(s)?<br />

No significant changes.<br />

Students will have slightly more choice in their 3rd year of study, especially those students that cannot afford the residential<br />

based field-courses run out of semester in overseas locations.<br />

7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />

Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />

please detail their comments.<br />

The external examiner, Prof. Mal Jones, was happy with the proposed changes <strong>and</strong> commented that he was "pleased to see a<br />

continuation of <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>'s long <strong>and</strong> well-regarded teaching of aquatic biology".<br />

Students on the C3C1 programme were invited to a meeting on the 3rd March 2011 with the Programme Director (Dr. Jon Grey)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Prof. Alan Hildrew to discuss the proposed changes to the programme. There were no objections raised at this meeting.<br />

Furthermore, none of the students have lodged any objections to the proposal since this meeting occurred.<br />

A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />

Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />

modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />

Yes<br />

> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />

amendment?<br />

Yes


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

Approval of Programme Amendment<br />

Programme<br />

Organiser*<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />

o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 11:21:37 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Advanced Aquatic Biology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

C100 Biology<br />

C300 Zoology<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 20 10 25


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences has recently withdrawn from a full undergraduate degree in Marine & Freshwater<br />

Biology <strong>and</strong> substituted the new C3C1 Zoology with Aquatic Biology code, which has inevitably led to a net loss in purely aquatic<br />

modules. Rationalization in teaching for efficiency (with the recent retirement of several key members of staff <strong>and</strong> imminent<br />

retirement of a professor) has meant the loss of individual, specialised modules. Aspects of Marine Biology (SBS308) <strong>and</strong><br />

Freshwater Biology (SBC316) have already been amalgamated into a holistic module encompassing the fundamentals of aquatic<br />

ecosystems at level 5: 'Aquatic Ecosystems: Structure <strong>and</strong> Function' (SBC212). To progress along the same vein, we wish to<br />

rationalise the remainder of SBC316 <strong>and</strong> 'Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management' (SBC314) with a new module.<br />

We propose a new 'Advanced Aquatic Biology' module designed specifically for students on the C3C1 (Zoology with Aquatic<br />

Biology) programme <strong>and</strong> which builds upon the fundamentals introduced via SBC212. Research <strong>and</strong> teaching of aquatic biology<br />

is perceived as a flagship specialization at QMUL, <strong>and</strong> we are proposing a cutting edge module with content reflecting hot topics<br />

of environmental <strong>and</strong> ecological issues in aquatic science. We will incorporate guest lectures from external environmental policy<br />

<strong>and</strong> management agencies, allowing direct contact with potential employers. Practical training will be via a week-long residential<br />

field-course.<br />

In addition to servicing C3C1, it will be offered as an optional module in programmes C100, C300, C1C8 <strong>and</strong> F850.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Lecture rooms<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

The field trip requires off-site accommodation <strong>and</strong> laboratory facilities as well as<br />

excellent access to marine <strong>and</strong> freshwater sites. This can be supplied by the Field<br />

Studies <strong>Council</strong>'s centre at Dale Fort in Wales, which we have used for residential<br />

field courses of this nature many times before.<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Advanced Aquatic Biology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Andrew G. Hirst<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

Aquatic Ecosystems: Structure <strong>and</strong><br />

Function SBC212<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

The module will address advanced aspects of aquatic environments <strong>and</strong> the organisms inhabiting these. It will identify the<br />

biological adaptations of aquatic taxa, factors controlling their community composition <strong>and</strong> ecosystem functioning. Global<br />

patterns of organismal <strong>and</strong> ecosystem rates (including the influence of body size, temperature <strong>and</strong> seasonality), <strong>and</strong> population<br />

processes of mortality, feeding <strong>and</strong> predator-prey size ratios will all be considered. There will be a compulsory one week-long<br />

field trip, which will give h<strong>and</strong>s-on experience of sampling <strong>and</strong> studying the ecology of organisms in their environment. Aspects<br />

of environmental change, policy <strong>and</strong> management will also be considered.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The module aims to provide level 6 students with advanced knowledge of:<br />

1. the physical <strong>and</strong> biotic factors that govern the distribution <strong>and</strong> success of marine <strong>and</strong> freshwater organisms.<br />

2. the ecology of aquatic organisms with respect to productivity, seasonality <strong>and</strong> their physico-chemical environments.<br />

3. the adaptations organisms have across a range of aquatic habitats (including morphology, behaviour <strong>and</strong> life-cycle<br />

characteristics).<br />

4. how in freshwaters (i.e. lakes, groundwaters, rivers <strong>and</strong> streams) organisms are integrally linked to their general geological<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />

5. practical skills in surveying, field data collection <strong>and</strong> reporting <strong>and</strong> interpretation of environmental data from aquatic<br />

environments.<br />

6. how to access information on current policy making <strong>and</strong> management practice (with guest lectures from industry, agencies<br />

<strong>and</strong> potential employers), including an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the European Water Framework Directive.<br />

The over-arching aim of this module is to provide the student with an advanced underst<strong>and</strong>ing of aquatic organisms within their<br />

environment, within an ecological <strong>and</strong> evolutionary context.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

A4<br />

A5<br />

A6<br />

the physical <strong>and</strong> biotic environment <strong>and</strong> its influence on the ecology of aquatic organisms.<br />

the primary principles underlying the distribution <strong>and</strong> production of aquatic organisms.<br />

the purpose of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD).<br />

differentiating between natural <strong>and</strong> modified l<strong>and</strong>scapes <strong>and</strong> their respective interaction with the aquatic fauna <strong>and</strong> flora.<br />

contemporary issues of global concern in aquatic environments, specifically environmental change, pollution, ocean<br />

acidification <strong>and</strong> invasive species.<br />

how to choose appropriate sampling methods for different aquatic taxa <strong>and</strong> environments (e.g. nets versus water bottles,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the rise of modern technologies for environmental assessment).<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

design <strong>and</strong> implement a field based research project (i.e. be able to derive hypotheses, design methods to test these).<br />

produce critical scientific reports (based on a field based project) that are coherent, making reference to the most recent<br />

science literature, <strong>and</strong> following the presentation styles of rigorous scientific writing.<br />

to critically assess the science <strong>and</strong> policy driving the European Water Framework Directive (WFD)<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

identify aquatic animals <strong>and</strong> plants inhabiting a range of salinities.<br />

discuss <strong>and</strong> appraise the suitability of sampling techniques required for quantitatively assessing numbers, types of<br />

organisms <strong>and</strong> population differences across a range of aquatic environments.<br />

design an appropriate sampling programme when given a specific set of objectives in a field situation.<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

communicate complex scientific ideas in written <strong>and</strong> verbal forms.<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Marine:<br />

1. Miller, C.B. 2004. Biological Oceanography. 1st Edition. Blackwell Publishing.<br />

2. Kiorboe, T. 2008. A mechanistic approach to plankton ecology. 1st Edition. Princeton University Press.<br />

3. Longhurst A. 1998. Ecological geography of the sea. <strong>Academic</strong> Press.<br />

4. Barnes, R.D. & Ruppert, E.E. 1994. Invertebrate Zoology. 6th Edition. Saunders College Publishing.<br />

5. Campbell, A. 1996. Hamlyn Guide Seashores <strong>and</strong> Shallow Seas.<br />

Freshwater:<br />

1. Kalff, J. 2002. Limnology. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall, 592pp.<br />

2. Wetzel, R.G. 2001. Limnology. <strong>Academic</strong> Press, 1066.<br />

3. Jones, J.B. & Mulholl<strong>and</strong>, P.J. 2000. Streams <strong>and</strong> Ground Waters. <strong>Academic</strong> Press, San Diego.<br />

Current literature will be consistently referred to in the lectures in order to provide cutting edge supplementary information <strong>and</strong><br />

the latest policy <strong>and</strong> management documentation available from stakeholders/end users provided via the invited external<br />

speakers.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures (22 hours), field trip (6 days - 8 hour days)<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

80 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Examination by essay Examination 3 hours 75% Yes 35%<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

Course work<br />

Coursework<br />

24 hours (field<br />

work)<br />

25% Yes 35%<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />

o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 11:15:43 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 118<br />

Programme Amendment Form<br />

This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />

the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />

• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />

necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />

• change in the length of the programme of study<br />

• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />

• changes in the programme regulations<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />

Programme Title(s) Zoology<br />

Programme Code(s) C300<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />

Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Prof Maurice Elphick<br />

1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />

modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />

specified. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the programme(s) should<br />

be provided in the table below.<br />

Withdraw level 6 modules SBC314 Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management; SBC316 Freshwater Biology.<br />

Add level 6 module Advanced Aquatic Biology (module proposal submitted)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 118<br />

Module Title<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Semester<br />

X Advanced Aquatic Biology SBC--- 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />

X<br />

2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />

Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />

3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011<br />

4) Rationale<br />

Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />

Due to a decline in student numbers, some programmes in the environmental area have now been withdrawn. In order to<br />

consolidate <strong>and</strong> increase teaching efficiency, material previously taught in SBC308 (module already withdrawn) <strong>and</strong> SBC316/<br />

SBC314 will be merged into the new module Advanced Aquatic Biology. The merger will also make better use of the field course<br />

facilities.<br />

5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />

No implications apart from appropriate lecture room facilities.<br />

6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />

proposed amendment(s)?<br />

No significant changes. Students will still be required to attend a field course prior to the beginning of their third year of study.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 118<br />

7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />

Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />

please detail their comments.<br />

A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />

Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />

modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />

Yes<br />

> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />

amendment?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Programme Amendment<br />

Programme<br />

Organiser*<br />

Maurice<br />

Elphick<br />

Digitally signed by Maurice Elphick<br />

DN: cn=Maurice Elphick, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong><br />

University of London, ou=School of<br />

Biolological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences,<br />

email=M.R.Elphick@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2010.11.12 11:37:13 Z<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />

o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.02.02 13:14:36 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

Programme Amendment Form<br />

This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />

the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />

• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />

necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />

• change in the length of the programme of study<br />

• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />

• changes in the programme regulations<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />

Programme Title(s) BSc Psychology<br />

Programme Code(s) C800<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />

Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

Institute of Health Sciences Education<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

None<br />

Programme Organiser Dr Qazi Rahman<br />

1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />

modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />

specified. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the programme(s) should<br />

be provided in the table below.<br />

We are proposing to enhance the coherence <strong>and</strong> subject-content of this programme by:<br />

- removing SBC343 Genes <strong>and</strong> Human Behaviour - see attached module withdrawal form


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

- adding a new module "The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> Origins of Morality" - see attached module proposal form.<br />

The spirit behind this change is to capitalise on the research expertise of new psychology staff in the SBCS to deliver research-led<br />

teaching at the final year of the degree programme. This amendment is in line with the College strategy to enhance research-led<br />

teaching.<br />

We are also requesting to move one module (Animal Cognition) from semester B to semester A of year 3 (see attached module<br />

update form).<br />

Module Title<br />

The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong><br />

Origins of Morality<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of Study<br />

Semester<br />

tbc 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />

2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />

Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />

N/A<br />

3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011<br />

4) Rationale<br />

Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />

See above under section 1<br />

5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />

None


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />

proposed amendment(s)?<br />

Students have been consulted <strong>and</strong> indicate approval of the changes<br />

7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />

Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />

please detail their comments.<br />

The external psychology advisor (Prof. Verity Brown) has been consulted <strong>and</strong> supports the above changes.<br />

A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />

Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />

modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />

Yes<br />

> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />

amendment?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Programme Amendment<br />

Programme<br />

Organiser*<br />

Qazi<br />

Rahman<br />

Digitally signed by Qazi Rahman<br />

DN: cn=Qazi Rahman, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong> University of London,<br />

ou=SBCS, email=q.rahman@qmul.<br />

ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.02.22 15:31:30 Z<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />

o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 11:19:33 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> the Origins of Morality<br />

Module Code TBA<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date January 2012<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

C800, C820, C890<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

None<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

None<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 60 None None<br />

2012/13 60 None None


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This will be an optional third year module for the BSc (Honours) Psychology programme. Module is not available to intercalating<br />

students. It will capitalize on the research expertise of new psychology staff in the SBCS, adding a new <strong>and</strong> exciting topic area to<br />

the programme, enhancing compliance with British Psychological Society (BPS) requirements for the teaching of developmental<br />

psychology, <strong>and</strong> allow research being conducted in the Biological <strong>and</strong> Experimental Psychology Group to feed directly into<br />

teaching of the psychology programme.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Appropriate teaching <strong>and</strong> examination facilities are already present for SBCS<br />

programmes.<br />

None<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> the Origins of Morality<br />

Module Code TBA<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Keith Jensen<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

To provide psychology students with a scientific overview of sociality <strong>and</strong> morality. This supports the distinctiveness of QMUL<br />

psychology as a natural <strong>and</strong> experimental science with a strong evolutionary thrust to generating predictions about<br />

psychological phenomena. Furthermore, it will build on student knowledge of developmental, comparative <strong>and</strong> social<br />

psychology. Students will be introduced to empirical findings <strong>and</strong> theories <strong>and</strong> will critically evaluate these. Topics covered will<br />

include moral developmental, moral sentiments <strong>and</strong> emotions, moral reasoning, neurology <strong>and</strong> endocrinology of social decision<br />

making, economic <strong>and</strong> game theoretical approaches, evolution <strong>and</strong> the psychology of social living, as well as cultural <strong>and</strong><br />

normative influences on social preferences <strong>and</strong> cultural group selection. Antisocial as well as prosocial aspects of human <strong>and</strong><br />

animal sociality will be discussed.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

1. To provide an overview of moral psychology <strong>and</strong> human sociality from an evolutionary perspective.<br />

2. To use developmental, comparative, economic <strong>and</strong> cross-cultural approaches to broaden our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the essence of<br />

humanity.<br />

3. To challenge conventional (rational) views of social decision making <strong>and</strong> consider the role of emotions <strong>and</strong> social concerns.<br />

4. To provide experience with critically evaluating empirical <strong>and</strong> theoretically works <strong>and</strong> to present these ideas <strong>and</strong> discuss them<br />

with peers.<br />

5. To comply with BPS requirements to cover teaching of developmental psychology.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

how moral behaviour develops from classical (Piagetian, Vygotskian, Kohlbergian) perspectives, as well as modern<br />

ones.<br />

the role of emotions <strong>and</strong> moral sentiments in guiding social behaviour.<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

consider the role of evolution <strong>and</strong> culture in shaping fundamentally important social behaviours.<br />

compare humans to other animals as a way of probing the nature of sociality.<br />

use game theoretical <strong>and</strong> economic approaches to make predictions about rational behaviour.<br />

critically evaluate the selective pressures that may have shaped a uniquely human cognitive ability.<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

critically appraise the empirical <strong>and</strong> theoretical literature, <strong>and</strong> thus develop skills of critique, evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />

assessment of different sources of information.<br />

present <strong>and</strong> defend ideas to peers <strong>and</strong> thus enhance the development of presentation skills.<br />

sustain intellectual discussion, thus enhance the development of oral communication <strong>and</strong> argument formation <strong>and</strong><br />

delivery skills.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

C 4<br />

write coherent <strong>and</strong> integrated syntheses of a complex topic that transcends traditional disciplines.<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

None<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Doris, J. M. (2010). The Moral Psychology H<strong>and</strong>book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right <strong>and</strong> Wrong. Ecco, NY: Harper Collins.<br />

Prinz, J. J. (2009). The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

22 hours (lectures)<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

128 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Coursework essay Coursework N/A 20% Yes U40A<br />

Class participation activities Coursework N/A 20% Yes U40A<br />

Exam (3 out of 7 essay questions) Examination 3 hours 60% Yes U40A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Resit examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />

Heathcote<br />

DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />

o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 11:16:33 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Programme Amendment(s)<br />

School of Electronic Eng. <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />

BSc Computer Science & Mathematics (GG41)<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

The programme amendment requires signature by the Head<br />

of School.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 120<br />

Programme Amendment Form<br />

This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />

the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />

• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />

necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />

• change in the length of the programme of study<br />

• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />

• changes in the programme regulations<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />

Programme Title(s) Computer Science & Mathematics<br />

Programme Code(s) GG41<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Dr Graham White<br />

1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />

modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />

specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />

programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />

in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />

Remove optional modules:<br />

- DCS235 Software Engineering <strong>and</strong> replace with DCS 234 “Software Engineering Theory”<br />

- DCS310 Systems Analysis from semesters 3 <strong>and</strong> 5<br />

- DCS219 Specification <strong>and</strong> Reasoning (this has not been offered since 2006)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 120<br />

Module Title<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Add / Remove<br />

Module from<br />

Programme<br />

X Software Engineering DCS235 30 5 Elective 2 Remove Module<br />

X Systems Analysis DCS310 15 5 Elective 2 Remove Module<br />

X Specification <strong>and</strong> Reasoning DCS219 15 5 Elective 2 Remove Module<br />

X Software Engineering Theory DCS234 15 5 Elective 2 Add Module<br />

2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />

Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />

3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011<br />

4) Rationale<br />

Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />

In response to a syllabus review by the School of Mathematical Sciences in the light of the <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework, we have<br />

reviewed the programme offered by EECS. Feedback <strong>and</strong> student results suggest that these joint programme students are<br />

inadequately prepared for the Software Engineering group project (semester 2 of the 30-credit DCS235 Software Engineering).<br />

However, we wish to continue to offer the students a basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of Software Engineering through the 15-credit DCS234<br />

Software Engineering Theory, especially since this has been requested by several students this year. Since the students are no<br />

longer undertaking the full DCS235 Software Engineering, they do not need to take DCS310 Systems Analysis. The dropping of<br />

DCS219 Specification <strong>and</strong> Reasoning simply reflects a change in EECS core provision.<br />

We believe that these changes streamline the programme, which will be to the students' benefit. We continue to offer a sufficient<br />

variety of modules to ensure regulatory conformance with the programme title <strong>and</strong> meet the expectations of students <strong>and</strong><br />

employers.<br />

5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />

None.<br />

6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />

proposed amendment(s)?<br />

No affect on study patterns. The students have not been formally consulted, although informal feedback suggests that the<br />

students are happy with the proposed changes relating to Software Engineering.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 120<br />

7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />

Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />

please detail their comments.<br />

No.<br />

A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />

Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />

modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />

N/A<br />

> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />

amendment?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Programme Amendment<br />

Programme<br />

Organiser*<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Programme Amendment(s)<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London SMD<br />

MSc Oral Biology <strong>and</strong> the following associated module<br />

proposals:<br />

Introduction to Oral Biology<br />

Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

Introduction to Oral Biology<br />

Total module notional study hours are specified as 162 hours.<br />

Typically a 15 credit module would comprise of 150 hours.<br />

The Board may wish to explore this.<br />

Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />

Total module notional study hours are specified as 162 hours.<br />

Typically a 15 credit module would comprise of 150 hours.<br />

The Board may wish to explore this.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Programme Amendment Form<br />

This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />

the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />

• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />

necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />

• change in the length of the programme of study<br />

• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />

• changes in the programme regulations<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />

Programme Title(s) MSc Oral Biology<br />

Programme Code(s)<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Master of Science (MSc) Full Time 1 Calendar Year<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Programme Organiser Dr Paul Anderson<br />

1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />

modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />

specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />

programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />

in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />

It is proposed to split the current 30 credit Module entitled Introduction to Oral Biology into two 15 credit modules.<br />

Thus the current 30 credit Introduction to Oral Biology Module is to be removed<br />

This will be replaced by:<br />

Introduction to Oral Biology (15 credit module)<br />

Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues (15 credit module)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Module Title<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Add / Remove<br />

Module from<br />

Programme<br />

X Introduction to Oral Biology 30 7 Core 1 Remove Module<br />

X Introduction to Oral Biology 15 7 Core 1 Add Module<br />

X<br />

Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental<br />

Tissues<br />

15 7 Core 1 Add Module<br />

2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />

Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />

3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction Sep 2011<br />

4) Rationale<br />

Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />

The Introduction to Oral Biology Module is a core module in the MSc in Oral Biology.<br />

The rationale for splitting the 30 credit Introduction to Oral Biology module <strong>and</strong> create two 15 credit modules is to allow<br />

flexibility for use of the two modules by other MSc programs which may only require the new Introduction to Oral Biology 15<br />

credit module. The MSc in Oral Biology course will now have both the Introduction to Oral Biology , <strong>and</strong> Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of<br />

Dental Tissues as core modules.<br />

5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />

The Introduction to Oral Biology Module will be taken by a larger number of students including the MSc in Oral Biology students<br />

(currently 21). The additional student numbers that take this module on other MSc programs will mean that a larger teaching<br />

space is required than that currently used. The host Dept. (Oral Growth <strong>and</strong> Development) does not have a sufficiently large<br />

teaching room to cope with more students. Therefore, a resource implication is teaching space.<br />

Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues module is unaffected.<br />

6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />

proposed amendment(s)?<br />

N/A


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />

Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />

please detail their comments.<br />

N/A<br />

A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />

Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />

modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />

Yes<br />

> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />

amendment?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Programme Amendment<br />

Programme<br />

Organiser*<br />

Paul<br />

Anderson<br />

Digitally signed by Paul Anderson<br />

DN: cn=Paul Anderson, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Dental Physical Sciences,<br />

email=p.<strong>and</strong>erson@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.01 10:27:41 Z<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 13:58:01 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Introduction to Oral Biology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A200<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Oral Biology<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 12 6 25<br />

2012/13 12 6 25<br />

2013/14 12 6 25


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module is a core module of the MSc in Oral Biology. The module is designed so that students have the basic knowledge of<br />

oral biology, both hard <strong>and</strong> soft tissues required for the later modules in the Oral Biology MSc <strong>and</strong> the Dental Materials MSc<br />

courses.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Seminar Room, AV facilities. (SEMS)<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Introduction to Oral Biology<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Sahar Mohsin <strong>and</strong> Dr Simon Rawlinson<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the introduction to the basic <strong>and</strong> clinical sciences of the dental hard<br />

<strong>and</strong> soft tissues <strong>and</strong> the biochemical processes processes relevant of Oral Biology.<br />

It will be conducted in the form of 12 seminars of 3 hour duration, <strong>and</strong> 6 research seminars.<br />

The major topics include:<br />

• Tooth development <strong>and</strong> mechanisms driving formation<br />

• Structure of enamel<br />

Structure of dentine<br />

Structure of bone<br />

Structure of the periodontal ligament<br />

Dental anomalies


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Lecture List:<br />

1. Tooth Development & Signalling Pathways<br />

2. Enamel<br />

a. Structure<br />

b. Development<br />

c. In relation to Restorative Procedures<br />

3. Dentine <strong>and</strong> the Dentine-Pulp Complex<br />

a. Dentine Formation (Dentinogenesis)<br />

b. Dentine Structure<br />

c. Dental Pulp<br />

d. Clinical correlations of Dentine- Pulp Structure<br />

e. Root Development <strong>and</strong> Cementogenesis<br />

4. Bone <strong>and</strong> Bone Remodelling<br />

a. Bone Histology<br />

b. Reactions of Bone to stress<br />

c. The Cellular Basis of Bone Remodelling Diseases<br />

5. Periodontal Ligament<br />

a. Tooth Support Mechanisms<br />

b. Dentogingival Junction; Clinical Aspects<br />

6. Dental anomalies<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This module will:-<br />

a) provide an overview of the scope of oral biology <strong>and</strong> its role in the practice of dentistry.<br />

b) improve an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the biological basis of oral phenomenon, whether normal or pathological.<br />

c) enhance an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how oral biological knowledge is acquired <strong>and</strong> how growth of such knowledge leads to a high<br />

quality of dental care.<br />

d) demonstrate how Oral Biology forms the basis for preventive dentistry clinical procedures.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

Development of the structures of the oro-dental tissues.<br />

Histological <strong>and</strong> physiological aspects of bone remodelling<br />

A 3


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

A 4<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong> how the microscopic structures enable the gross anatomical structure <strong>and</strong> function<br />

Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current oral biology literature<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Evaluate <strong>and</strong> discuss the importance of evidence based dentistry<br />

Demonstrate collaborative communication principles at appropriate levels for various audiences (Lay <strong>and</strong><br />

professional)<br />

C 3<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

Employ appropriate media to support group presentations<br />

Demonstrate skills of systematic analysis, synthesis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of their own research or advanced<br />

scholarship<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Oral BioSciences by DB Ferguson; Churchill Livingstone ISBN 0443053731.<br />

Oral Anatomy, Histology <strong>and</strong> Embryology by BKB Berkovitz, GR Holl<strong>and</strong>, BJ Moxham. ISBN 0723431817<br />

~-~-<br />

-~ Master Dentistry Volume 3: Oral Biology BKB Berkovitz, BJ Moxham, R.W.A. Linden, A.J. Sloan ISBN 978-0-702-03122-9


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

All lectures ran as interactive seminars. Lecturer will introduce broad<br />

academic aims, then give examples of research related to those<br />

academic aims. Each lecture seminar lasts 3 hours.<br />

Total: 36 h<br />

In addition, there are 3 2h research seminars<br />

Total: 42 h<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Students to spend at 6 hours study per seminar.<br />

Total 72 hours<br />

In addition, students set 1 formative <strong>and</strong> 1 summative essays<br />

24 hours per essay.<br />

Total 120h<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

162 h<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Written paper<br />

Section A 40 % 4 short questions<br />

Section B 60% 3 long questions<br />

out of choice of 6<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Examination 2.5h 70 Yes 50<br />

1 Essay Coursework 2500 words 30 Yes 50<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 13:56:41 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

A200 Pre-clinical Dentistry<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Oral Biology<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 12 6 25<br />

2012/13 12 6 25<br />

2013/14 12 6 25


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module is a core module of the MSc in Oral Biology. The module is designed so that students have the basic knowledge of<br />

oral biology, both hard <strong>and</strong> soft tissues, <strong>and</strong> novel laboratory methods for their study, required for the later modules in the<br />

course.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Seminar Room, AV facilities.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Sahar Mohsin <strong>and</strong> Dr Simon Rawlinson<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the introduction to the basic sciences <strong>and</strong> biochemical processes of<br />

the oral soft tissues, salivary gl<strong>and</strong>s,, the structures of the skull relevant t o Oral Biology how the hard <strong>and</strong> soft tissues are<br />

involved in mastication, <strong>and</strong> finally an introduction to a wide variety of advanced laboratory methods used in modern Oral<br />

Biology research<br />

It will be conducted in the form of 12 seminars of 3 hour duration, <strong>and</strong> 6 research seminars.<br />

The major topics include:<br />

• Oral mucosa development, <strong>and</strong> pathology<br />

Salivary gl<strong>and</strong>s


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Lecture List<br />

1. Oral Mucosa<br />

Pathophysiology of oral diseases<br />

2. Salivary Gl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

a. Structure & Function<br />

b. Salivary Secretion & autonomic control<br />

c. Formation of Saliva<br />

3. Osteology Skull<br />

a. Skull, Neurocranium, Base<br />

b. Maxilla & M<strong>and</strong>ible<br />

c. Face & Palate<br />

4. Mastication<br />

5. Introduction to Investigative Techniques in Oral Biology<br />

a: NMR/ESR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance/ Electron Spin Resonance<br />

b: Synchrotron techniques<br />

c. X-Ray Diffraction<br />

d: Imaging<br />

e: Chemical analyses<br />

f: Electron Microscopy<br />

g: optical microscopies including confocal microscopy<br />

h: biochemical methods<br />

i: Cell culture techniques<br />

j: microtomography<br />

k: scanning microradiography<br />

(12 lectures)<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This module will:-<br />

a) provide an overview of the scope of oral biology <strong>and</strong> its role in the practice of dentistry.<br />

b) improve an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the biological basis of oral phenomenon, whether normal or pathological.<br />

c) enhance an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how oral biological knowledge is acquired <strong>and</strong> how growth of such knowledge leads to a high<br />

quality of dental care.<br />

d) demonstrate how oral biology forms the basis for preventive dentistry clinical procedures.<br />

e) introduce methods for Oral Biology research<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

Structure of the skull supporting the dentition<br />

Salivary gl<strong>and</strong>s structure <strong>and</strong> salivary secretion<br />

Anatomy <strong>and</strong> physiology of mastication<br />

Modern laboratory techniques in Oral Biology research<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong> how the microscopic structures enable the gross anatomical structure <strong>and</strong> function<br />

Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current oral biology literature<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Discuss options for the use modern laboratory techniques in Oral Biology research<br />

Demonstrate collaborative communication principles at appropriate levels for various audiences (Lay <strong>and</strong> professiona<br />

C 3<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

Employ appropriate media to support group presentations<br />

Demonstrate skills of systematic analysis, synthesis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of their own research or advanced<br />

scholarship<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Oral BioSciences by DB Ferguson; Churchill Livingstone ISBN 0443053731.<br />

Oral Anatomy, Histology <strong>and</strong> Embryology by BKB Berkovitz, GR Holl<strong>and</strong>, BJ Moxham. ISBN 0723431817<br />

Master Dentistry Volume 3: Oral Biology BKB Berkovitz, BJ Moxham, R.W.A. Linden, A.J. Sloan ISBN 978-0-702-03122-9


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

All lectures ran as interactive seminars. Lecturer will introduce broad<br />

academic aims, then give examples of research related to those<br />

academic aims. Each lecture seminar lasts 3 hours.<br />

Total: 36 h<br />

In addition, there are 3 research seminars Total: 6 h<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Students to spend at 6 hours study per seminar.<br />

Total 72 hours<br />

In addition, students set 1 formative <strong>and</strong> 1 summative essays<br />

24 hours per essay. Total 48h<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

162 h<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Written paper<br />

Section A 40 % 4 short questions<br />

Section B 60% 3 long questions<br />

out of choice of 6<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Examination 2.5h 70 Yes 50<br />

1 Essay Coursework 2500 words 30 Yes 50<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 13:58:39 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Module Proposal<br />

School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Econometrics C<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

The duration of the midterm test(s) is specified as TBA. Can<br />

this be clarified?


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Econometrics C<br />

Module Code ECOM033<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

L140 Econometrics<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

N/A<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

N/A<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Economics PG<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 12 3 30


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The module is being introduced to provide an advanced econometrics track in Semester 2 for MSc students intending to pursue<br />

doctoral study. That is to say, Econometrics A in Semester 1 can be followed by either Econometrics B (an existing module) or<br />

Econometrics C (the new module).<br />

Econometrics C will be compulsory for students on the MSc Economics (L1S1/L1SP) programme, <strong>and</strong> an option for students on<br />

the Finance <strong>and</strong> Economics (L1T3/L1T4) <strong>and</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> Econometrics (L1S5/L1S9) programmes.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

One teaching room <strong>and</strong> one lecturer to teach.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

N/A<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Econometrics C<br />

Module Code ECOM033<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Professor Emmanuel Guerre<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

ECOM003 Econometrics A<br />

ECOM032 Econometrics B<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

The purpose of this module is to equip students with the probabilistic <strong>and</strong> statistical tools necessary to undertake research in<br />

econometrics <strong>and</strong> to cover a number of important topics in this field. The module starts with a review of large sample theory, <strong>and</strong><br />

then proceeds to analyze the asymptotic behavior of extremum estimators, including maximum likelihood <strong>and</strong> generalized<br />

methods of moments. Some important efficiency results will be covered. Finally, the module will deal with panel data, limited<br />

dependent variables, unit roots, <strong>and</strong> cointegration.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The purpose of the module is to provide a rigorous foundation in econometrics for students wishing to undertake theoretical or<br />

applied research in this field.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

advanced estimation methods<br />

the construction <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of statistical tests<br />

the analysis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of panel data models<br />

the analysis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of models with limited dependent variables<br />

unit roots, cointegration, <strong>and</strong> other advanced topics in time-series econometrics.<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

propose <strong>and</strong> study estimators derived from general estimation principles<br />

construct tests derived from general testing principles<br />

elaborate on st<strong>and</strong>ard econometric models dealing with time series, limited dependent variables, unit root <strong>and</strong><br />

cointegration<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> interpret the numerical outcomes of econometric procedures


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

specify an estimation or testing method appropriate for a model<br />

read theoretical <strong>and</strong> applied articles in econometric journals<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Hayashi, F. (2000). Econometrics. Princeton University Press.<br />

Newey, W.K. & D. Mc Fadden (1994). Large Sample Estimation <strong>and</strong> Hypothesis Testing. Chap. 36, H<strong>and</strong>book of Econometrics,<br />

Volume 4, Elsevier.<br />

W. H. Greene (2003). Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Fifth Edition.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

lecture 2 hours/week<br />

seminar 1 hour/week<br />

3 hours/week total instructional time<br />

11 weeks in Semester 2<br />

33 hours total instructional time<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

7 hours/week learning time<br />

11 weeks in Semester 2<br />

77 hours total learning time<br />

40 hours total revision time<br />

117 hours total independent learning time<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

33 hours total instructional time<br />

117 hours total independent learning time<br />

150 total module notional study hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

midterm test(s) Coursework TBA 25% No none<br />

final examination Examination 2.5 hours 75% Yes none<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Digitally signed by George Kapetanios<br />

DN: cn=George Kapetanios, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, UoL, ou=School of Economics <strong>and</strong><br />

Finance,<br />

email=g.kapetanios@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.02.01 12:03:34 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Module Proposal<br />

School of Law<br />

Medical Law & The Family<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

No significant issues identified.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Medical Law & The Family<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 45 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

M260 Medical Law<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Law<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

LLM<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 30 5 n/a


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The rationale of this module is to introduce law students to the gradual attention of medical lawyers, legislators <strong>and</strong> the courts to<br />

familial aspects <strong>and</strong> influences on various health care issues. Therefore, this course will explore in detail the relationship between<br />

medicine, law <strong>and</strong> the family. The course aims to explain the complex issues surrounding the doctor-patient-family relationship<br />

<strong>and</strong> analyze the different moral <strong>and</strong> legal arguments in this complicated area. Students seeking to be involved in the practice of<br />

medical law <strong>and</strong> family law needs to underst<strong>and</strong> the relevant issues which arise as a result of the developments of medical<br />

technologies <strong>and</strong> this module meets these needs. Students interested in research will acquire knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills which enable<br />

them in their studies in medical law, bioethics <strong>and</strong> family law. This module broadens the scope of the legal analysis taught in the<br />

department of law in the above three areas <strong>and</strong> complements courses currently taught in these areas in the department of law.<br />

This course will be offered as an optional module in the LLM programme.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Department of law, School of Law<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Medical Law & The Family<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 45 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr. Roy Gilbar<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

The family has gradually gained the attention of medical lawyer, legislators <strong>and</strong> the courts on various health care issues.<br />

Therefore, this course will explore the relationship between medicine, law <strong>and</strong> the family. It will concentrate on: (1) the impact of<br />

medical technologies on the formation of the family <strong>and</strong> its perception in society; (2) the involvement of the family when<br />

decisions about the patient’s medical treatment are considered; <strong>and</strong> (3) the impact of medicine on the relationship between<br />

family members.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

(i) To deepen the knowledge on the subject, particularly the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> appreciation of the relationship between<br />

medicine, law <strong>and</strong> the family.<br />

(ii) To engender a critical appreciation of the dynamic nature of this area <strong>and</strong> how it has developed in response to sociological,<br />

philosophical <strong>and</strong> medical influences.<br />

(iii) To foster a great appreciation of the disparate judicial, law reform, academic <strong>and</strong> participant views that influence<br />

developments in this area.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

the relationship between law, medicine <strong>and</strong> the family<br />

the legal, bioethical <strong>and</strong> practical aspects of the doctor-patient-family relationship<br />

the impact of medical technologies on the formation <strong>and</strong> perception of the family in law <strong>and</strong> society<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

produce a critical evaluation of the relevant arguments <strong>and</strong> principles used by the legislator, the courts <strong>and</strong><br />

professional bodies <strong>and</strong> assess their potential strength <strong>and</strong> shortcomings in their application<br />

apply different perceptions of leading legal principles to relevant cases<br />

improve their ability to provide critical analysis when facing relevant cases in practice <strong>and</strong> research<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

identify conflicting moral <strong>and</strong> legal arguments when facing relevant cases in practice<br />

apply relevant knowledge in legal analysis <strong>and</strong> study<br />

provide a critical analysis of the relevant principles in medical law <strong>and</strong> family law generally


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

deal with complicated medico-legal issues <strong>and</strong> make informed judgements<br />

apply knowledge when facing relevant cases in practice <strong>and</strong> research<br />

present different conflicting views in medical law, bioethics <strong>and</strong> family law<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

The lecturer's h<strong>and</strong>outs<br />

Relevant books on the subject are:<br />

Lindemann Nelson H., Lindemann-Nelson J., The Patient in the Family (Routledge, 1995)<br />

Hardwig J., Is There a Duty to Die: And other essays in Medical Ethics (Routledge, 2000)<br />

Mackenzie C., Stoljar N., Relational Autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency <strong>and</strong> the social self (OUP, 2000)<br />

Gilbar R., The Status the Family in Law & Bioethics: The genetic context (Ashgate, 2005)<br />

Mclean S., Autonomy, Consent <strong>and</strong> the Law (Routledge-Cavendish, 2010)<br />

Morris A., Jones M., Blackstone’s Statutes on Medical Law (6th edn., 2009).<br />

Periodical literature<br />

- Gilbar R., Family involvement, independence <strong>and</strong> patient autonomy in practice (2011) 19 Medical Law Review (forthcoming)<br />

- O’Donovan K., Gilbar R., The loved ones: Families, intimates <strong>and</strong> patient autonomy (2003) 23 (2) Legal Studies 332-358<br />

- Hardwig J., What about the family? (1990) 20 Hastings Center Report 5-10<br />

- Cassell E., Unanswered questions: Bioethics <strong>and</strong> human relationships (2007) 37 (5) Hastings Center Report 20-23<br />

- Minow M., Who’s the patient? (1994) 53 <strong>Mary</strong>l<strong>and</strong> Law Review 1173-1192<br />

- Brazier M., Do no harm- do patients have responsibilities too? (2006) 65 (2) Cambridge Law Journal 397-422<br />

- Lindemann-Nelson H., Lindemann-Nelson J., The romance of the family (2008) 38 (4) Hastings Center<br />

- Murray T., What are families for? Getting an ethics of reproductive technology (2002) 32 (3) The Hastings Center Report 41<br />

- Gilbar R., Between unconditional acceptance <strong>and</strong> responsibility: Should family ethics limit the scope of reproductive autonomy?<br />

(2009) 21 (3) the Child & Family Law Quarterly 309-335<br />

Relevant case law


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

weekly seminars/lectures = 44 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

weekly reading, 8 hours= 200 hours<br />

revision for the exam= 206 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

45 hours = 450 notional study hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

final exam Examination 3 hours 100% Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Peter<br />

Alldridge<br />

Digitally signed by Peter Alldridge<br />

DN: cn=Peter Alldridge, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=Department of Law,<br />

email=p.w.alldridge@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 12:56:14 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Module Proposal(s)<br />

School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />

Mapping the Nation, 1707-1801<br />

James Joyce's Finnegans Wake<br />

Feminist Thought: History, Criticism <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />

Milton: Revolutions in Writing<br />

Performance <strong>and</strong> Celebrity<br />

Renaissance Performance <strong>and</strong> the Lyric Voice<br />

Staging the UK<br />

The Court of Henry Viii: Then <strong>and</strong> Now<br />

The crisis of culture: literature <strong>and</strong> politics, 1918-1948<br />

Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

Staging the UK<br />

This module is to be made available to associate<br />

students. Will they do exactly the same assessment as<br />

QM students?<br />

Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />

This module is to be made available to associate<br />

students. Will they do exactly the same assessment as<br />

QM students?


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Mapping the Nation, 1707-1801<br />

Module Code ESH7101<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date January 2012<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

Q320 English Literature<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

n/a<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

n/a<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 5 12<br />

2012/13 10 5 12<br />

2013/14 10 5 12


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This optional module may be taken by students on the MA Writing <strong>and</strong> Society 1700-1820, <strong>and</strong> other MA programmes in English.<br />

Its concern with national <strong>and</strong> regional identity complements the emphasis on space <strong>and</strong> location found in existing historicising<br />

modules on the MA (such as Panoramas of London, Metro-Intellectuals, <strong>and</strong> Sociability), <strong>and</strong> supplements their metropolitan<br />

focus with attention to regional <strong>and</strong> national l<strong>and</strong>scapes. The module's engagement with questions of patriotism, tourism, <strong>and</strong><br />

the emergence of national infrastructures complements many of the issues explored in the Primitivism <strong>and</strong> Progress module,<strong>and</strong><br />

also addresses geographical <strong>and</strong> aesthetic texts concerning l<strong>and</strong>scapes that are not elsewhere examined on the MA.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Students will be expected to purchase some texts, <strong>and</strong> the VLE will be used.<br />

Copies of set texts (listed below), <strong>and</strong> recommended secondary texts, should be<br />

purchased by the library. The module will also require 2 hours per week of staff<br />

teaching time, plus admin support.<br />

n/a<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Mapping the Nation, 1707-1801<br />

Module Code ESH7101<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr. Chris Reid<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module will examine texts concerned with British/UK national identity <strong>and</strong> the representation of l<strong>and</strong>scape, between the<br />

Anglo-Scottish Union of 1707 <strong>and</strong> the Anglo-Irish Union of 1800-1801 (<strong>and</strong> its immediate legacy). We will use a range of<br />

theoretical, historiographical <strong>and</strong> methodological approaches to consider how authors responded to the constitutional <strong>and</strong><br />

cultural emergence of ‘Great Britain’ <strong>and</strong> the ‘United Kingdom’. Through the consultation of contemporary essays, novels, travelliterature,<br />

journalism, guide-books, poetry, philosophical texts <strong>and</strong> visual material, we will explore how attitudes to national <strong>and</strong><br />

regional identity were expressed through representations of the national l<strong>and</strong>scape. Related questions of patriotism, cultural<br />

nationalism, l<strong>and</strong>scape aesthetics, radical ideology, tourism, the liberty of the press, <strong>and</strong> the relationship between politics <strong>and</strong><br />

culture will be addressed through readings of printed literary, political <strong>and</strong> geographical texts, <strong>and</strong> supplementary secondary <strong>and</strong><br />

theoretical texts. In addition, students will be encouraged <strong>and</strong> guided to consult manuscript sources relevant to the module's<br />

concerns.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

1. To introduce students to a range of texts published between 1707 <strong>and</strong> 1801, <strong>and</strong> subsequently, that reflect upon the period's<br />

legacy in the history of nationhood <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />

2. To develop students’ capacity for the analysis <strong>and</strong> interpretation of a range of genres <strong>and</strong> sources from the eighteenth century.<br />

3. To explore connections between literary texts, non-fictional texts (including, but not limited to, guide-books, travel-writing,<br />

newspapers, <strong>and</strong> letters) <strong>and</strong> non-textual artefacts (including, but not limited to, paintings <strong>and</strong> maps).<br />

4. To develop students' skills in the evaluation of both printed <strong>and</strong> manuscript primary source material, in relation to<br />

contemporary scholarly debates.<br />

5. To enable students to use <strong>and</strong> evaluate a range of research aids (including, but not limited to, printed <strong>and</strong> electronic aids) to<br />

locate relevant printed <strong>and</strong> manuscript sources, as part of the students' independent <strong>and</strong> insightful research into literature of the<br />

British Isles in the long eighteenth century.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

a range of texts published between 1707 <strong>and</strong> 1801, <strong>and</strong> subsequently, that reflect upon the period's legacy in terms of<br />

the history of nationhood <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />

the geo-historical, political, biographical <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts relevant to the study of selected literary, political,<br />

geographical, <strong>and</strong> philosophical texts on the reading list.<br />

circumstances pertaining to the production, dissemination <strong>and</strong> reception of the textual <strong>and</strong> non-textual artefacts<br />

consulted during the module.<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

conduct perceptive <strong>and</strong> historically-informed readings of texts across a number of genres from the long eighteenth<br />

century.<br />

evaluate the propriety <strong>and</strong> relevance of a range of theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological approaches to research.<br />

evaluate the relative importance of evidence, arguments <strong>and</strong> resources derived from primary <strong>and</strong> secondary material.<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

develop initiative in structuring independent research, including the use of research aids to locate relevant sources.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

enhance skills in working individually <strong>and</strong> collectively, in a range of environments including (but not limited to)<br />

independent research, presentation, essay-writing <strong>and</strong> seminar discussion.<br />

adapt <strong>and</strong> transfer the critical methods that will be introduced in the module to a variety of working environments<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

use research aids (including, but not limited to, printed <strong>and</strong> electronic aids) to locate relevant printed <strong>and</strong> manuscript<br />

sources, as part of the students' independent <strong>and</strong> insightful research into literature of the British Isles in the long<br />

eighteenth century.<br />

develop skills in comparing texts <strong>and</strong> artefacts across a range of genres; <strong>and</strong> connecting ideas within the field of study.<br />

use writing for learning <strong>and</strong> reflection, <strong>and</strong> in doing so, develop skills in researching <strong>and</strong> constructing original <strong>and</strong><br />

perceptive essays.<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Week 1: The 1707 Anglo-Scottish Union <strong>and</strong> its Legacy<br />

Daniel Defoe: essays concerning the Union (1706-1707); <strong>and</strong> Tour Through the Whole Isl<strong>and</strong> of Great Britain (1724-6): selections<br />

Tobias Smollett, The Expedition of Humphrey Clinker (1771)<br />

Week 2: The Spirit of Patriotism<br />

Lord Bolingbroke, Letters on the Spirit of Patriotism (1749)<br />

Essays by Tobias Smollett <strong>and</strong> John Wilkes from The Briton <strong>and</strong> The North Briton (1762-3)<br />

Week 3: The British L<strong>and</strong>scape I: The Politics of the Prospect<br />

James Thomson, The Seasons (1728-30)<br />

John Dyer, 'Grongar Hill' (1726)<br />

Week 4: The British L<strong>and</strong>scape II: The Politics of the Sublime <strong>and</strong> Picturesque<br />

Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Inquiry into the Sublime <strong>and</strong> the Beautiful (1757)<br />

Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgement (1790): selections<br />

William Gilpin, Observations on the River Wye (1789) <strong>and</strong> Three Essays (1792): selections<br />

William Wordsworth, Guide to the Lakes (1810-1835): selections<br />

Week 5: 'The Country <strong>and</strong> the City': the Centre <strong>and</strong> the Margin?<br />

Raymond Williams, The Country <strong>and</strong> the City (1973)<br />

Gilbert White, The Natural History <strong>and</strong> Antiquities of Selborne (1789): selections<br />

William Wordsworth, The Prelude (1805/1850): selections<br />

Week 6: Celtic <strong>and</strong> Gaelic L<strong>and</strong>scapes<br />

James MacPherson, Fragments of Ancient Poetry (1760-63) <strong>and</strong> The Works of Ossian (1765): selections<br />

Iolo Morganwg (AKA Edward Williams), Poems, Lyric <strong>and</strong> Pastoral (1794) <strong>and</strong> Barddoniaeth Dafydd ab Gwilym (1789): selections<br />

Walter Scott, Waverley (1814)<br />

Week 8: Visual L<strong>and</strong>scapes: How to See the Nation<br />

Peter de Bolla, The Education of the Eye (2003)<br />

A selection of texts concerning the foundation of the Royal Academy of Art<br />

William Wordsworth's 'Inscription: Written with a Slate Pencil on the Side of the Mountain of Black Combe' <strong>and</strong> 'View from the<br />

Top of Black Combe' (1815)<br />

Week 9: Whose Nation?: Revolutionary L<strong>and</strong>scapes


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />

Richard Payne Knight, The L<strong>and</strong>scape, a Didactic Poem (1794)<br />

Uvedale Price, An Essay on the Picturesque (1794)<br />

John Clare, Poems Descriptive of Rural Life <strong>and</strong> Scenery (1820): selections<br />

Week 10: Satirising the Nation<br />

Tobias Smollett, The History <strong>and</strong> Adventures of an Atom (1769)<br />

Visual material: a selection of satirical prints from the British Museum Catalogue of Prints<br />

Week 11: The L<strong>and</strong> at War: Military L<strong>and</strong>scapes<br />

Henry Fielding, The History of Tom Jones, A Foundling (1749): selections<br />

Visual material: William Roy's Military Survey of Scotl<strong>and</strong> (1747-1755) <strong>and</strong> selection of Paul S<strong>and</strong>by's l<strong>and</strong>scape watercolours from<br />

catalogue of Royal Academy exhibition 2010<br />

Jane Austen, Pride <strong>and</strong> Prejudice (1813)<br />

Week 12: The 1801 Anglo-Irish Union: a United kingdom?<br />

Maria Edgeworth, The Absentee (1812)<br />

Sydney Owenson, The Wild Irish Girl: A National Tale (1806)<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

2 hours of structured seminar contact per week. Tutor will also be<br />

available for 1 scheduled office hour per week, over the 11 weeks of<br />

the module.<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

278 hours (st<strong>and</strong>ard notional time on all MA English modules,<br />

covering library research, primary <strong>and</strong> secondary reading, class<br />

preparation <strong>and</strong> preparation for final assessment).<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

300 hours.<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Essay Coursework 4000 words 100% Yes 50<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 11:05:41 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title James Joyce's Finnegans Wake<br />

Module Code ESH7302<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

Q322 English Literature by author<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 5 12<br />

2012/13 10 5 12<br />

2013/14 10 5 12


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module will be offered as an option to students taking the MA in English Literature <strong>and</strong> the MA in Writing in the Modern Age.<br />

It will supplement naturally a number of other modules currently available, including Freud <strong>and</strong> Proust, Modernism <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>,<br />

Modernism, Secularism <strong>and</strong> Religion, <strong>and</strong> Postcolonialism, Language <strong>and</strong> Identity.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

lecturing staff<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title James Joyce's Finnegans Wake<br />

Module Code ESH7302<br />

Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Katie Fleming<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

Finnegans Wake has a reputation as the most difficult work of fiction ever written in the English (?) language. This course will<br />

offer students the opportunity to judge this for themselves in the context of a supportive <strong>and</strong> collaborative tutor-led seminar.<br />

Each week we will cover a couple of chapters <strong>and</strong> explore the text from a number of critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical perspectives, from<br />

psychoanalysis to postcolonial theory. Experience of studying Joyce or Modernism is desirable but not required, <strong>and</strong> it would be<br />

helpful if students could read Ulysses in advance of the course.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This module aims to offer students the opportunity to read this notoriously difficult <strong>and</strong> under-read yet theoretically <strong>and</strong><br />

historically important book from within the context of a supportive <strong>and</strong> collaborative seminar. It will allow students to develop<br />

their close reading <strong>and</strong> analytical skills, <strong>and</strong> to become familiar with, <strong>and</strong> fluent in the application of, a wide variety of critical <strong>and</strong><br />

theoretical perspectives.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

one of the most difficult works of fiction ever written in the English language<br />

the linguistic, literary, cultural <strong>and</strong> socio-historical contexts in which Finnegans Wake was written <strong>and</strong> read<br />

knowledge of useful <strong>and</strong> precise critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical terminology<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

articulate knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of Finnegans Wake <strong>and</strong> the concepts <strong>and</strong> theories relating to it<br />

demonstrate critical skills in the close reading, description, analysis, or production of Finnegans Wake<br />

demonstrate rhetorical skills of effective communication <strong>and</strong> argument, both oral <strong>and</strong> written<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

demonstrate advanced literacy <strong>and</strong> communication skills <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply these in appropriate contexts,<br />

including the ability to present sustained <strong>and</strong> persuasive written <strong>and</strong> oral arguments cogently <strong>and</strong> coherently<br />

the capacity to analyse <strong>and</strong> critically examine diverse forms of discourse<br />

demonstrate the capacity for independent thought <strong>and</strong> judgement demonstrated through critical practice


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

demonstrate competence in the planning <strong>and</strong> execution of essays, presentations, <strong>and</strong> other writing <strong>and</strong> project work<br />

show time management <strong>and</strong> organisational skills, as shown by the ability to plan <strong>and</strong> present conclusions effectively.<br />

use information technology (IT) skills broadly understood <strong>and</strong> demonstrate the ability to access, work with <strong>and</strong><br />

evaluate electronic resources (such as hypertext, conferencing, e-publishing, blogs <strong>and</strong> wikis)<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Finnegans Wake - seminar plan<br />

Seminar 1– Introduction – Beyond Ulysses<br />

Close reading: Detailed group reading of the first page.<br />

Seminar 2- Falling into Joyce<br />

Chapter 1 (3 – 29)<br />

Chapter 2 (30-47)<br />

Seminar 3 – The dangers of idle talk<br />

Chapter 3 (48 – 74)<br />

Chapter 4 (75 – 103)<br />

Seminar 4 – Reading Joyce Reading Us<br />

Chapter 5 (104 - 125)<br />

Chapter 6 (126 – 168)<br />

Seminar 5 – Writing <strong>and</strong> the self<br />

Chapter 7 (169 – 195)<br />

Chapter 8 (196 – 216)<br />

Seminar 6 – Deconstruction <strong>and</strong> the Wake?<br />

Chapter 9 (219 – 259)<br />

Seminar 7 – Sincerity <strong>and</strong> the Aesthetics of Chaosmos<br />

Chapter 10 (260 – 308)<br />

Seminar 8 - Technology <strong>and</strong> techno-poetics<br />

Chapter 11 (309 – 382)<br />

Seminar 9 – The Ondt <strong>and</strong> the Gracehoper<br />

Chapter 12 (383 – 399)<br />

Chapter 13 (403 – 428)<br />

Seminar 10 – (first half) Travelling the world<br />

Chapter 14 (429 – 473)<br />

Seminar 10 (second half) Trial, Confession <strong>and</strong> ethics. Politics <strong>and</strong> character in Finnegans Wake<br />

Chapter 15 (474 – 554)<br />

Seminar 11- Conclusions?


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />

Chapter 16 (555 – 590)<br />

Chapter 17 (593 – 628)<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

2 hour seminar (22 hours in total)<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

16 hours reading per week (160 hours); 118 hours working on<br />

assessment<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

300 notional study hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Essay Coursework 4000 100 Yes 50<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 11:06:30 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Feminist Thought: History, Criticism <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />

Module Code ESH389<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

Q300 English studies<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 30 10 36<br />

2012/13 40 10 54<br />

2013/14 40 10 54


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module would be offered as an option at Level 6, <strong>and</strong> would be aimed at 3rd year English joint <strong>and</strong> single honours<br />

undergraduates <strong>and</strong> Associate students in the Department of English. It is might also be of interest to students from History, Film<br />

<strong>and</strong> Politics departments. The installation of this module as a 3rd year option would complete a pathway that begins with the<br />

first year ESH102 Reading Theory <strong>and</strong> Interpretation course of study where students are briefly introduced to feminist criticism. It<br />

would also supplement Level 5 modules like ESH230 Women Writing in the Romantic Period <strong>and</strong> ESH243 Architexts, <strong>and</strong> its<br />

robust theoretical framework would usefully complement a range of Level 6 modules including ESH376 Gender, Race <strong>and</strong> Empire<br />

<strong>and</strong> ESH330 Virginia Woolf. The module is intended to address a long-st<strong>and</strong>ing deficiency in the provision of modules in the<br />

Department that deal with women’s writing generally, <strong>and</strong> it would further contribute to the good range of contemporary critical<br />

<strong>and</strong> theoretical modules available at Level 6. The module steers a course through the literary criticism, history <strong>and</strong> theory of<br />

feminism, running from the publication of Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex in 1949, to the contemporary period.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

2 staff members; AV-equipped teaching room<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Feminist Thought: History, Criticism <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />

Module Code ESH389<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Katherine Fleming<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module engages with contemporary feminist thought, steering a course though the literary criticism, history <strong>and</strong> theory of<br />

feminism from the publication of Simone de Beauvoir's 'The Second Sex' in 1949 onwards. It examines the significant debates<br />

<strong>and</strong> key concepts of feminist thought through a range of literary, political <strong>and</strong> philosophical texts <strong>and</strong> encourages students to<br />

develop their own critical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of gender <strong>and</strong> equality issues in the contemporary period. Students are invited to<br />

explore the impact of feminist approaches on literary criticism, to underst<strong>and</strong> the critical feminist project in its own terms, <strong>and</strong> to<br />

examine feminism in relation to Marxism, psychoanalysis, sexuality, post-structuralism, neo-liberalism <strong>and</strong> international<br />

feminism.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The object of this module is to steer a course through the history, literary criticism <strong>and</strong> theory of feminist thought in the<br />

contemporary period. Students who undertake this module will have acquired knowledge of the modern history of women’s<br />

struggle, <strong>and</strong> have an in-depth underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the significant debates <strong>and</strong> key concepts of feminist thought. The module<br />

prompts students to trace these debates <strong>and</strong> concepts through a range of material of different genre, <strong>and</strong> to draw from the<br />

selected texts a theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of gender <strong>and</strong> sexual difference. The course also encourages students to think<br />

conceptually <strong>and</strong> to develop their own independent <strong>and</strong> well-informed critical positions in relation to the material they read<br />

both here <strong>and</strong> elsewhere.<br />

As a third-year Level 6 module, this course of study completes a pathway through the QM undergraduate English degree that<br />

allows students to engage with writing about <strong>and</strong>/or by women. The module supplements a range of our pre-existing modules<br />

<strong>and</strong> the theoretical <strong>and</strong> conceptual thinking that it fosters should enhance the student’s critical approaches to the other modules<br />

they also take.<br />

The module will also further contribute to the Department's sense of English Studies as a broad, interdisciplinary, <strong>and</strong> farreaching<br />

domain. By offering a module especially concerned with issues of gender <strong>and</strong> equality, the School might also be seen<br />

to sanction feminist thought as a valuable component of its own intellectual culture.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

a substantial number of authors <strong>and</strong> texts from across the periods of contemporary feminist<br />

history.<br />

useful <strong>and</strong> precise critical terminology of feminist thought.<br />

the literary, cultural <strong>and</strong> socio-historical contexts in which feminist thought is written <strong>and</strong> read.<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

demonstrate the critical skills of close reading, description, analysis of the key texts<br />

of feminist discourse.<br />

articulate knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of texts, concepts <strong>and</strong> theories relating to feminism <strong>and</strong> its critical <strong>and</strong><br />

literary history.<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> how feminist thought takes different forms according to different cultural contexts <strong>and</strong> conditions.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

demonstrate advanced literacy <strong>and</strong> communication skills <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply these in appropriate contexts,<br />

including the ability to present sustained <strong>and</strong> persuasive written <strong>and</strong> oral arguments cogently <strong>and</strong> coherently.<br />

analyse <strong>and</strong> critically examine diverse forms of discourse.<br />

acquire substantial quantities of complex information in a structured <strong>and</strong> systematic way involving the use of the<br />

distinctive interpretative skills of the subject.<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

adapt <strong>and</strong> transfer the critical methods of the discipline to a variety of working environments.<br />

demonstrate competence in the planning <strong>and</strong> execution of essays, presentations, <strong>and</strong> other<br />

writing work.<br />

comprehend <strong>and</strong> develop intricate concepts in an open-ended way which involves an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of purpose <strong>and</strong><br />

consequences.<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Indicative Reading List:<br />

Please note that the final selection of extracts <strong>and</strong> texts for each week will to be taken from (but not<br />

necessarily including all) the texts listed below.<br />

Week 1: The Second Sex:<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, (1949)<br />

Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae, (1990)<br />

Nina Power, One Dimensional Woman (2009)<br />

Week 2: 1968 & the Women’s Movement<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (1970)<br />

Kate Millett, Sexual Politics (1968)<br />

Boston Women’s Collective, Our Bodies Ourselves (1973)<br />

Week 3: Women, Pacificism <strong>and</strong> War<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Lysistrata<br />

Virginia Woolf, Three Guineas (1938)<br />

Simone Weil, Gravity <strong>and</strong> Grace (1947/52)<br />

Week 4: ‘What women want’: Freud, Femininity & Psychoanalysis<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Sigmund Freud, 'Femininity', in New Introductory Lectures in Psychoanalysis (1932)<br />

Jacqueline Rose, 'Femininity <strong>and</strong> its Discontents', in Sexuality in the Field of Vision (1986)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

Juliet Mitchell, Psychoanalysis & Feminism: Freud, Reich, Laing <strong>and</strong> Women (1974)<br />

H.D, Letters <strong>and</strong> Tribute to Freud (1956)<br />

Week 5: Politics of Pornography<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Andrea Dworkin, Intercourse (1987)<br />

Catherine MacKinnon, Pornography <strong>and</strong> Civil Rights: A New Day for Women's Equality (1988)<br />

Anais Nin, selected stories from Little Birds (1979)<br />

Week 6: Consuming <strong>and</strong> Producing Culture<br />

Laura Mulvey, ‘Visual Pleasure <strong>and</strong> Narrative Cinema’, in Screen (1975) 16 (3): 6–18<br />

Susan Sontag, On Photography (1977), selected extracts<br />

This week may incorporate a research trip to the Women’s Library to speak with contemporary artists who were commissioned to<br />

produce work for the libraries permanent collection in 2010, or a viewing <strong>and</strong> discussion of 'InThe Cut' (Campion, 2003).<br />

Week 7: Reading Week<br />

Week 8: French Feminism<br />

Luce Irigaray, Speculum of the Other, selected extracts<br />

Helène Cixous, ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’, (1976)<br />

Julia Kristeva, ‘Stabat Mater’, in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Toril Moi (1986)<br />

Jacques Derrida, ‘Women in the Beehive’ in differences (2005) 16 3, 139-15<br />

Week 9: Queerying Sexuality<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectics of Sex (1970)<br />

Judith Butler, Gender Trouble (1990)<br />

Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Tendencies (1993)<br />

Week 10: Prosthetic Goddesses<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Donna Haraway, ŒA Cyborg Manifesto: Science Technology <strong>and</strong> Socialist- Feminism in the Late 20th Century (1985)<br />

Naomi Wolf, The Beauty Myth (1991)<br />

Elizabeth Grosz, Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism (1994)<br />

Joanna Zylinska, On Spiders, Cyborgs <strong>and</strong> Being Scared: the Feminine <strong>and</strong> the Sublime (2001)<br />

Week 11: International Feminisms<br />

Selected extracts from:<br />

Mahasweta Devi, Imaginary Maps (1995)<br />

Joumana Haddad, I Killed Scheherezade: Confessions of An Angry Arab Woman (2010)<br />

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, The Caged Virgin: A Muslim Woman's Cry for Reason (2006)<br />

Week 12: Feminism <strong>and</strong> neo-liberalism<br />

Michele Barrett <strong>and</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> McIntosh, The Anti-Social Family (1991)<br />

Selected extracts from contemporary women web-loggers, including Dooce.com, the F-Word blog, bitchmagazine.org <strong>and</strong><br />

Broadsheet at www.salon.com<br />

General Reading:<br />

Cora Kaplan’s Sea Changes: Culture <strong>and</strong> Feminism (1986)<br />

Reina Lewis <strong>and</strong> Sara Mills (ed) Feminist Postcolonial Theory (2003)<br />

Catherine Stimpson, Where the Meanings are: Feminism <strong>and</strong> Cultural Spaces (1984)<br />

Toril Moi, Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory (1985/ 2002)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

2 hour seminars for 11 weeks (22 hours teaching in total per<br />

seminar group), with out of class hours assignment consultations.<br />

The module may also incorporate a research trip to the Women's<br />

Library in Aldgate.<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

At least 6 hours reading per week (66 hours), plus approximately 65<br />

hours working on assessment<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

153 notional study hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Portfolio of 2 assignments from<br />

the selection below:<br />

1. Close reading of de Beauvoir,<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

2. Analysis of press cutting or<br />

image, or<br />

3. Selection <strong>and</strong> summary of<br />

critical feminist review article<br />

published after 1990<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Coursework 2000 40 No N/A<br />

Critical Essay Coursework 3000 60 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 11:08:25 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Milton: Revolutions in Writing<br />

Module Code ESH390<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code Q322 English Literature by author<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

None<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

None<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 18 10 18<br />

2012/13 18 10 18<br />

2013/14 18 10 18


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This option module will contribute significantly to the offerings in the Department at Level 6 in the Renaissance <strong>and</strong> Early<br />

Modern Subject Area Group. It responds specifically to requests made by students taking ESH224 Seventeenth-Century Literary<br />

Culture for further study of Milton <strong>and</strong> Paradise Lost. It will enable students to concentrate on the (extremely influential) writings<br />

of a single author at the highest undergraduate level, <strong>and</strong> will fill a gap in our offerings in the later seventeenth century. It will<br />

thus contribute to pathways of study in this historical period, while also linking to those in the early eighteenth century. In<br />

addition, it will provide an opportunity for students with an interest in poetry to develop this by means of an intensive reading of<br />

a single text in the epic tradition. However, the intensive reading will be carefully contextualised, both historically <strong>and</strong> formally:<br />

students will gain a sophisticated underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the literary, religious, <strong>and</strong> social politics of the mid to late seventeenth<br />

century, <strong>and</strong> consider what it might mean for an author to effect political change through writing in poetry <strong>and</strong> prose. It will be<br />

available to single <strong>and</strong> joint honours English students <strong>and</strong> Associates.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

1 staff member; AV-equipped teaching room<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

None<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Milton: Revolutions in Writing<br />

Module Code ESH390<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr David Colclough<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None None ESH224, ESH267<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module offers an intensive study of the writing <strong>and</strong> thought of John Milton: possibly the most important author of the<br />

seventeenth century. At its heart is a detailed reading <strong>and</strong> discussion of Milton’s great epic poem, Paradise Lost (1674). We will<br />

consider what Milton aimed to effect in writing <strong>and</strong> publishing Paradise Lost, <strong>and</strong> will study it in the context of the changes in<br />

society <strong>and</strong> religion that were taking place at the time. Milton was a political revolutionary; he was also a revolutionary writer,<br />

who attempted to carry out a thorough reform of English literature as well as of English society. In seminar discussions we will<br />

analyze Paradise Lost alongside some of Milton’s other revolutionary writings, including his plea for the freedom of the press,<br />

Areopagitica (1644).


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This module aims to introduce students to one of the greatest poems in the English language, Paradise Lost. It aims to help<br />

students to build on their previous studies in developing the critical tools necessary to analyze such a complex piece of epic<br />

verse, <strong>and</strong> to guide them towards the sources of contextual information that will help them to underst<strong>and</strong> it in its moment of<br />

composition <strong>and</strong> publication, as well as in the subsequent history of English literature. It aims further to encourage students to<br />

consider at a sophisticated level the relationship between writing <strong>and</strong> society at a time of rapid <strong>and</strong> intense social <strong>and</strong> political<br />

change, <strong>and</strong> to reflect on the ways in which writers past <strong>and</strong> present conceive of the place of the author in wider society.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A complex, long, <strong>and</strong> influential epic poem (Paradise Lost) <strong>and</strong> its historical contexts<br />

The critical tradition on Paradise Lost <strong>and</strong> the current state of scholarship on the text <strong>and</strong> its author<br />

Critical debates concerning the relationship between literary writing <strong>and</strong> society, both in the seventeenth century <strong>and</strong><br />

today<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Carefully analyze the form <strong>and</strong> arguments of long passages of verse in seventeenth-century English<br />

Set a work of literature in its historical context <strong>and</strong> select the most appropriate context through which to advance an<br />

interpretation of it<br />

Read <strong>and</strong> assess the usefulness of a wide range of critical writing on the text; engage with <strong>and</strong> debate the opinions of<br />

the best past <strong>and</strong> current scholarship<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Research independently in primary <strong>and</strong> secondary literature <strong>and</strong> marshall evidence to produce an original argument<br />

Present opinions eloquently <strong>and</strong> in a well organised form to peers <strong>and</strong> teachers, both orally <strong>and</strong> in writing<br />

Reflect in a sophisticated manner on own performance <strong>and</strong> those of others, both in discussion <strong>and</strong> in writing


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Write in a fluent, sophisticated, <strong>and</strong> persuasive style at the highest level<br />

Confidently advance structured arguments in oral presentation<br />

Debate professionally <strong>and</strong> coherently with peers <strong>and</strong> teachers<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Week 1 Introduction: Milton – Writing Revolution / Revolutions in Writing<br />

Milton, ‘To the Lord General Cromwell’; selections from Of the Tenure of Kings <strong>and</strong><br />

Magistrates.<br />

Gordon Campbell <strong>and</strong> Thomas N. Corns, John Milton: Life, Work, <strong>and</strong> Thought (Oxford:<br />

Oxford University Press, 2008).<br />

Week 2 Paradise Lost, Books 1 <strong>and</strong> 2<br />

AND<br />

Selections from Homer, Iliad <strong>and</strong> Odyssey; Virgil, Aeneid; Edmund Spenser, The Faerie <strong>Queen</strong>, ed. A.C. Hamilton, 2nd edn (Harlow,<br />

2006); The Putney Debates (1647)<br />

Week 3 Paradise Lost, Books 3 <strong>and</strong> 4<br />

AND<br />

Selections from King James Bible (Romans; Genesis); Andrew Willett, Hexapla in Genesim (Cambridge, 1608)<br />

Week 4 Paradise Lost, Books 5 <strong>and</strong> 6<br />

AND<br />

Selections from John Dod <strong>and</strong> Robert Cleaver, A godly form of household government for the ordering of private families,<br />

according to the direction of Gods word<br />

(1621); Mercurius Politicus <strong>and</strong> Mercurius Rusticus [Civil War newsbooks]<br />

Week 5 Paradise Lost, Books 7 <strong>and</strong> 8<br />

AND<br />

Selections from King James Bible (Genesis); John Donne, Two Sermons Preached before King Charles, Upon the xxvi verse of the<br />

first Chapter of genesis (preached 1629); Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologica.<br />

Week 6 IN-CLASS TEST<br />

Week 7 R E A D I N G W E E K<br />

Week 8 Paradise Lost, Books 9 <strong>and</strong> 10<br />

AND<br />

Selections from Aemelia Lanyer, Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum (1611); John Donne, Biathanatos (1648)<br />

Week 9 Paradise Lost, Books 11 <strong>and</strong> 12<br />

AND<br />

Selections from St Augustine, The City of God; Jean Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion; [George Carleton], The Collegiat<br />

Svffrage of the Divines of Great Britaine, concerning the five articles controverted in the Low Countries (1619).<br />

Week 10 Paradise Regain’d<br />

AND


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />

Selections from Milton, De Doctrina Christiana.<br />

Week 11 Areopagitica: Publishing Freedom<br />

AND<br />

Nigel Smith, ‘Areopagitica: voicing contexts, 1643-5’, in David Loewenstein <strong>and</strong> James Grantham Turner (eds), Politics, Poetics,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Hermeneutics in Milton’s Prose (Cambridge, 1990).<br />

David Norbrook, Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric <strong>and</strong> Politics 1627-1660 (Cambridge, 1999), pp. 118-139.<br />

Week 12 Review <strong>and</strong> Conclusion; essay consultations<br />

General Reading:<br />

John Milton, Paradise Lost, ed. Alastair Fowler, 2nd edn (1998)<br />

John Milton, Samson Agonistes, in The Complete Shorter Poems, ed. John Carey, 2nd edn (1997)<br />

John Milton, Areopagitica (1644)<br />

Sharon Achinstein, Milton <strong>and</strong> the Revolutionary Reader (1994)<br />

Gordon Campbell <strong>and</strong> Thomas N. Corns, John Milton: Life, Work, <strong>and</strong> Thought (2008)<br />

Thomas N. Corns (ed.), A Companion to Milton (2003)<br />

Dennis Danielson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Milton (1999)<br />

Stanley Fish, Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost (1997)<br />

Annabel Patterson, Milton's Words (2009)<br />

Joad Raymond, Milton's Angels (2010)<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

2-hour seminar, including student presentations (2 hours/wk; 22<br />

hours total)<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Student research <strong>and</strong> preparation: 6 hours/wk (66 hours total)<br />

Preparation of two elements of assessment: 62 hours total<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

In-class test (formative: students<br />

consolidate first half of module<br />

by responding to one<br />

comprehension exercise <strong>and</strong> one<br />

essay question)<br />

Research essay (students<br />

undertake summative<br />

assessment by researching <strong>and</strong><br />

writing at length of one of a<br />

number of essay questions)<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Coursework 2hrs 30 No N/A<br />

Coursework 4000 words 70 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 11:09:17 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Performance <strong>and</strong> Celebrity<br />

Module Code DRA341<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

W400 Drama<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Other (please specify by typing in box)<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

NA<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Drama<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 21 15 25<br />

2012/13 21 15 25<br />

2013/14 21 15 25


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Critical engagement with the social <strong>and</strong> cultural phenomenon of ‘celebrity’ is relatively new. In the last ten years, scholars <strong>and</strong><br />

theorists have begun to frame celebrity as not merely a manifestation of narcissism <strong>and</strong> media manipulation, but rather a vital<br />

<strong>and</strong> dynamic social terrain in which a variety of disciplines (e.g. sociology, history, philosophy, psychology, visual art,<br />

performance) can converge in t<strong>and</strong>em with a variety of dialectics (e.g. Marxism, Feminism, cultural materialism).<br />

The success of the new Routledge publication, “Celebrity Studies” (launched in 2010 <strong>and</strong> already rolling out its second volume)<br />

speaks to both the intellectual <strong>and</strong> academic interest generated by the work, <strong>and</strong> its ability to reach out to a larger audience.<br />

A course centered around the study of celebrity would be an exciting <strong>and</strong> interesting addition to <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>’s curriculum<br />

precisely because it intersects with the department’s theoretical pluralism <strong>and</strong> inter-disciplinary ethos, it will ensure that students<br />

are part of generating discourse around a new field, <strong>and</strong> it will contribute to the dialogue between academia <strong>and</strong> the greater<br />

public.<br />

Optional: single <strong>and</strong> joint honours Drama students plus Associates<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

lecturer<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

NA:<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Performance <strong>and</strong> Celebrity<br />

Module Code DRA341<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Nadia Davids<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

N/A N/A N/A<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module examines ‘celebrity’ <strong>and</strong> the ‘performance of celebrity’. It positions an array of celebrities (actors, politicians,<br />

musicians, sports-people) within their individual political, social, historical <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts allowing them to be read as<br />

‘media texts’ through which to think through <strong>and</strong> around issues of commodification, globalization stardom, narcissism,<br />

iconography, philanthropy, cultural appropriation, media consumption <strong>and</strong> media production. The module refracts these issues<br />

through a variety of theoretical <strong>and</strong> ideological lenses (feminism, Marxism, cultural materialism, post-colonialism), encouraging<br />

close analysis of the way in which celebrity constructions of race, gender, nation, sexuality <strong>and</strong> power function in the public’s<br />

imagination. The module focuses on the development <strong>and</strong> imperatives of 21st century fame, opening with historical-case studies<br />

of manifestations of celebrity <strong>and</strong> culminating in contemporary case studies.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

-give an overview of the intersections <strong>and</strong> connections between media, power, performance <strong>and</strong> globalisation<br />

- encourage students to engage critically with the ubiquitous presence of media, celebrity <strong>and</strong> the heightened performance of<br />

the every-day in their daily lives.<br />

- further develop <strong>and</strong> deepen student’s theoretical knowledge <strong>and</strong> to provide them with instances in which they can forge new<br />

relationships between “text” <strong>and</strong> theory. (This emphasis on theory will be especially stressed as a means of replacing anecdotal<br />

discussions of celebrity with analytical ones)<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

The relationship between media, celebrity <strong>and</strong> commodification.<br />

An underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the cultural, historical <strong>and</strong> political premise on which 'celebrity' is built<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

An underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how to apply a variety of theoretical discourses onto public 'media texts'<br />

Further familiarity with a vocabulary of critique to further their scholarly <strong>and</strong>/or creative practice<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Students would have gained experience in researching, analysing <strong>and</strong> writing a long-form essay.<br />

Students would have gained experience <strong>and</strong> practice in researching <strong>and</strong> presenting an in class presentation.<br />

Practical skills - able to:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />

D 1<br />

Write critically, execute individual research, work collaboratively with others, present to a group<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Currid, Elizabeth, Starstruck: The Business of Celebrity. Faber <strong>and</strong> Faber, 2010.<br />

Da Marshall, P, The Celebrity Culture Reader / Edition 1, Taylor & Francis, Inc, 2006.<br />

Goodall, Jane, Stage Presence, Routledge, 2008<br />

Gamson, Joshua, Claims to Fame: Celebrity in Contemporary America, University of California Press, 1996.<br />

Holmes, Su <strong>and</strong> Sean Redmond (eds) Celebrity Studies,.Taylor & Francis, Inc, Routledge, 2010.<br />

Inglis, Fred. A Short History of Celebrity. Princeton University Press, 2010.<br />

Roach, Joseph. It. The University of Michigan Press, 2007.<br />

Turner, Graeme, Celebrity. SAGE Publications, 2006.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

2 hours per week seminars x 11 weeks = 22 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

128 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Presentation Coursework 10 minutes 40 No N/A<br />

Long Form Essay Coursework 3500 words 60 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Michael<br />

McKinnie<br />

Digitally signed by Michael McKinnie<br />

DN: cn=Michael McKinnie, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=Department of Drama,<br />

email=m.mckinnie@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 11:02:31 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Renaissance Performance <strong>and</strong> the Lyric Voice<br />

Module Code ESH392<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date January 2012<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

Q321 English Literature by period<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 15 15 36<br />

2012/13 15 15 36<br />

2013/14 15 15 36


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module will be available for students on the English <strong>and</strong> all associated programmes <strong>and</strong> Associate students. It will be an<br />

optional module for students primarily in the final year of study (though will also be open to suitably qualified students in the<br />

second year). It will permit students with an interest in the literature of the English Renaissance to study the poetry of the period<br />

in more depth <strong>and</strong> in different ways. It will follow on naturally from the core level 4 module, Poetry: A Basic Course, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

popular level 5 course Early Modern Drama <strong>and</strong> Social Process (<strong>and</strong> its ‘further study option’). Thus, it will ensure that those<br />

students wishing to continue studying the period’s literature may learn about poetic, as well as theatrical texts, <strong>and</strong> that those<br />

with a broad interest in poetry may specialise in the Renaissance. Its performance elements will also be of interest to joint<br />

honours students of English <strong>and</strong> Drama.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

One lecturer<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Renaissance Performance <strong>and</strong> the Lyric Voice<br />

Module Code ESH392<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Gwilym Jones<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None<br />

None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

The flourishing of poetry in late early modern Engl<strong>and</strong> overlaps with the boom in theatre which saw Shakespeare’s plays staged.<br />

Those developments were interdependent, not just in the works of Shakespeare <strong>and</strong> fellow playwrights – Marlowe, Jonson,<br />

Middleton – who also wrote poetry, but in the poetic output of their audiences. Early modern London was a performative world,<br />

<strong>and</strong> we can approach its poetry through <strong>and</strong> as performance. We are comfortable viewing play texts as pieces of literature to be<br />

read. This is because we know that close reading such texts allows us to realise elements which remain hidden in performance. In<br />

this module, we reverse this trend to answer such questions as: what does the performance of poetry show us that reading does<br />

not? how does the drama of the period, <strong>and</strong> other types of performance, enable us to approach the poetry? to what extent is the<br />

lyric voice encapsulated by, or mediated through, forms of performance?


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

• To examine in close detail some key poems of the late 16th <strong>and</strong> early 17th century <strong>and</strong> to increase familiarity with the range of<br />

English poetry in this period;<br />

• To contextualize poems with reference to contemporary issues of performance (the public theatre boom, the theatrical sermon,<br />

the public executions, etc.);<br />

• To consider the above in relation to current theories on performance <strong>and</strong> poetry;<br />

• To familiarize students with performing poetry <strong>and</strong> the arguments for treating poetry as performance;<br />

• To use the poetic texts as a lens through which to think about key contexts <strong>and</strong> forces prevalent in the Renaissance (eg. the<br />

humoral body, censorship, the environment, travel, the English Empire etc.)<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

The poetry of the English Renaissance, in particular the works of John Donne, William Shakespeare, Ben Jonson,<br />

Isabella Whitney, Christopher Marlowe <strong>and</strong> George Herbert.<br />

The various concepts of 'performance' in early modern Engl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the ways in which the cultural contexts of<br />

performance can be traced in the poetry.<br />

The competing theories of approaching poetry as <strong>and</strong> through performance.<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Analyse poetic texts with respect both to the cultural conditions of their production in the early modern period, <strong>and</strong><br />

to recent theories of literature <strong>and</strong> performance.<br />

Interpret poetry through performance <strong>and</strong> critically evaluate their interpretation <strong>and</strong> the performances of others.<br />

Propose, develop <strong>and</strong> defend their own ideas concerning the relationship of poetry <strong>and</strong> performance.<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Find appropriate primary <strong>and</strong> secondary materials to further their own independent study using online reproductions<br />

of early modern texts, electronic journals etc.<br />

Communicate effectively, in presentations <strong>and</strong> written work, using critical terminology appropriate to the study of<br />

literature <strong>and</strong> cultural history.<br />

Integrate their knowledge of renaissance poetry within the wider discipline of English Literature.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />

C 4<br />

Use their independent learning ability in continuing professional development.<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

Perform a poetic text with confidence <strong>and</strong> clarity.<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Week 1: Contexts of Renaissance Performance<br />

Selection of ballads.<br />

Andrew Gurr, ‘Physical Conditions’ in Playgoing in Shakespeare’s London, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: CUP, 2004), pp. 14-57.<br />

‘Rehearsal in the Theatres of Peter Quince <strong>and</strong> Ben Jonson’ in Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Oxford: OUP, 2000), 22-45.<br />

Week 2: Reading Poetry, Reading Performance<br />

Christopher Marlowe, ‘Hero <strong>and</strong> Le<strong>and</strong>er’; William Shakespeare, selection of sonnets.<br />

W.B. Worthen, extracts from ‘From Poetry to Performance’ in Drama: Between Poetry <strong>and</strong> Performance (Chichester: Wiley-<br />

Blackwell, 2009), pp. 35-93.<br />

‘Interiority: the sonnets, Hamlet <strong>and</strong> King Lear’ in David Schalkwyk Speech <strong>and</strong> Performance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets <strong>and</strong> Plays<br />

(Cambridge, CUP: 2002), pp. 102-149.<br />

Week 3: Gesture 1<br />

John Bulwer, Chirologia (London: 1642).<br />

From David Bevington, Action is Eloquence: Shakespeare’s Language of Gesture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).<br />

Week 4: The Renaissance Body<br />

John Donne, ‘The Flea’, Holy Sonnet 14; George Herbert, ‘Sin’.<br />

From Robert Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621).<br />

From Noga Arikha, Passions <strong>and</strong> Tempers: A History of the Humours (New York: Harper Collins, 2009).<br />

Week 5: Gesture 2<br />

Shakespeare ‘Sonnet 29’; John Bulwer, Chirologia (London: 1642).<br />

Bruce R Smith, ‘How Should One Read a Shakespeare Sonnet?’ in Phenomenal Shakespeare (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010),<br />

pp. 38-82.<br />

Week 6: Performing the Religious Self<br />

Aemilia Lanyer, ‘Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum’; Selection of Donne’s religious poetry <strong>and</strong> sermons; Selection of George Herbert’s<br />

poetry.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />

Margaret Fetzer, Extracts from John Donne’s Performances: Sermons, Poems, Letters <strong>and</strong> Devotions (Manchester: MUP, 2010).<br />

Week 7: Reading Week<br />

Extracts from P. A. Skantze, Stillness <strong>and</strong> Motion in the Seventeenth-Century Theatre (London: Routledge, 2003) <strong>and</strong> W. B.<br />

Worthen, Shakespeare <strong>and</strong> the Authority of Performance (Cambridge, CUP. 1997).<br />

Week 8: In-Class Performance Assessment<br />

No prescribed reading.<br />

Week 9: Performing Emotions: Sorrow<br />

John Donne, ‘A Valediction Forbidding Mourning’, ‘A Valediction of Weeping’; Ben Jonson, ‘On My First Daughter’, ‘On My First<br />

Son’.<br />

‘Weeping on Stage’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Audiences Weeping’ from Matthew Steggle, Laughing <strong>and</strong> Weeping in the Early Modern Theatres<br />

(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 39-57; 81-99.<br />

Week 10: Performing Emotions: Love<br />

William Shakespeare, selection of sonnets; John Donne, selection of verse.<br />

John H. Astington, ‘Shadows, Jests <strong>and</strong> Counterfeits’ in Actors <strong>and</strong> Acting in Shakespeare’s Time: The Art of Stage Playing<br />

(Cambridge: CUP, 2010), pp. 12-38.<br />

Week 11: Performing Emotions: Joy <strong>and</strong> Laughter<br />

Selection of ballads; Ben Jonson, ‘Inviting a Friend to Supper’ <strong>and</strong> selected epigrams.<br />

‘Laughing on Stage’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Audiences Laughing’ from Matthew Steggle, Laughing <strong>and</strong> Weeping in the Early Modern Theatres<br />

(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 25-38; 57-81.<br />

Week 12: Conclusion: Recontextualising Renaissance Performance<br />

Bruce R Smith, ‘As It Likes You’, in Phenomenal Shakespeare (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 1-37.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

2 hours per week in the form of seminars <strong>and</strong> workshops = 22 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

6 hours per week reading = 72 hours<br />

60 hours working on assessment.<br />

Total independent hours = 132<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

153 notional study hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Performance c. 5<br />

minutes per<br />

entrant..<br />

Critical reflection<br />

1,500 word limit.<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Devised performance of poem,<br />

<strong>and</strong> critical reflection.<br />

Coursework<br />

30 No N/A<br />

Independent Essay Coursework 3,000 words 70 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.09 10:21:33 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Staging the UK<br />

Module Code DRA253<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

W400 Drama<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

BA Drama<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 21 15 25<br />

2011/12 21 15 25<br />

2012/13 21 15 25


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The module is designed to:<br />

- bridge student learning (skills <strong>and</strong> content) across level 4's London/Culture/Performance <strong>and</strong> level 6's Theatre, Performance,<br />

Globalisation<br />

- extend students' opportunity to learn about theatre in national contexts (cf. modules on theatre in Irel<strong>and</strong>, South Africa <strong>and</strong><br />

Spain)<br />

- contextualise the Department's many modules on cultural practices in the metropolis of London <strong>and</strong> in international contexts<br />

- exploit extensive staff research in this area<br />

- be attractive to <strong>and</strong> beneficial for students, both 'regular' <strong>and</strong> Associate<br />

- contribute to the College's strategic aim to promote core values of citizenship, in local, national <strong>and</strong> international contexts.<br />

Optional<br />

Offered to students on the following programmes:<br />

BA Drama (W400)<br />

BA English <strong>and</strong> Drama (QW34)<br />

BA Film Studies <strong>and</strong> Drama (WW46)<br />

BA Russian <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR47)<br />

BA Hispanic Studies <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR44)<br />

BA German <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR42)<br />

BA French <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR41)<br />

plus Associate students<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Usual (teaching, room, AV)<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Usual (library, AV)<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Staging the UK<br />

Module Code DRA253<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Professor Jen Harvie<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module explores theatre in the UK, the conditions in which it happens, what it does <strong>and</strong> how this helps us underst<strong>and</strong> the UK<br />

<strong>and</strong> its cultures. Focusing (usually) on the twentieth <strong>and</strong> twenty-first centuries, it explores theatre practices including playwriting<br />

<strong>and</strong> performance, but also, for example, programming, design, festivals, directing, acting, reviewing, theatre-building, funding


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />

<strong>and</strong> policy-making. It focuses on examining this theatre’s cultural effects, from providing entertainment to supporting<br />

economies, modelling new modes of expression <strong>and</strong> articulating cultural identities.<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

To develop students’ underst<strong>and</strong>ing of UK theatre, its contexts <strong>and</strong> its effects (e.g. ideological, financial, cultural etc.)<br />

To develop students’ ability to examine cultural practices in context <strong>and</strong> to assess their effects<br />

To develop students’ skills in constructive discussion, critical reading <strong>and</strong> thinking, independent research <strong>and</strong> critical writing.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

theatre practices, their contexts <strong>and</strong> effects<br />

theoretical approaches to assessing culture<br />

key practices in theatre, such as its making, production, criticism, funding, etc.<br />

critical perspectives on this theatre<br />

relevant research sources <strong>and</strong> strategies for work in this area<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

analyse, synthesise <strong>and</strong> evaluate sources <strong>and</strong> arguments<br />

formulate <strong>and</strong> defend argument


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />

B 3<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

read critically<br />

write critically<br />

contribute constructively to critical discussion<br />

pursue independent research<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

manage a project<br />

work collaboratively with others<br />

execute independent research<br />

write critically<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Barker, Clive <strong>and</strong> Maggie B. Gale, British Theatre between the Wars, 1918-1939, 2001.<br />

D'Monte, Rebecca, <strong>and</strong> Graham Saunders, eds, Cool Britannia? British Political Drama in the 1990s,<br />

Freshwater, Helen, Theatre Censorship in Britain: Silencing, Censure <strong>and</strong> Suppression, 2009.<br />

Harvie, Jen, Staging the UK, 2005.<br />

Hingorani, Dominic, British Asian Theatre: Dramaturgy, Process <strong>and</strong> Performance, 2010.<br />

Holdsworth, Nadine, Joan Littlewood's Theatre, 2011.<br />

Holdsworth, Nadine, Theatre & Nation, 2010.<br />

Godiwala, Dimple, Alternatives Within the Mainstream: British Black <strong>and</strong> Asian Theatres, 2006.<br />

Kershaw, Baz, ed., The Cambridge History of British Theatre: Volume 3, Since 1985, 2004.<br />

Lacey, Stephen, British Realist Theatre: New Wave in Its Context, 1956-65, 1995.<br />

Little, Ruth, <strong>and</strong> Emily McLaughlin, The Royal Court Theatre Inside Out, 2007.<br />

Prior, Michael, Dreams <strong>and</strong> Reconstruction: a Cultural History of British Theatre: 1945-2006, 2006.<br />

O'Quinn, Daniel, <strong>and</strong> Jane Moody, eds, The Cambridge Companion to British Theatre, 1730-1830, 2007.<br />

Rebellato, Dan, 1956 <strong>and</strong> All That: Making of Modern British Drama, 1999.<br />

Shank, Theodore, Contemporary British Theatre, 1996.<br />

Shellard, Dominic, British Theatre Since the War, 2000.<br />

Shellard, Dominic, The Golden Generation: New Light on Post-war British Theatre, 2008.<br />

Shepherd, Simon, The Cambridge Introduction to Modern British Theatre, 2009.<br />

Sierz, Aleks, In-yer-face Theatre: British Drama Today, 2001.<br />

Sierz, Aleks, Rewriting the Nation: British Theatre Today, 2011.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Seminars: 2 hours/week = 22 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

student research <strong>and</strong> preparation, including 2 hours independent<br />

fieldwork per week: 6 hours/wk: 66 hours total; preparation of<br />

elements of assessment: 62 hours total = 128 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Short essay Coursework 1000 words 30% No N/A<br />

Longer essay Coursework 3000 words 70% Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Michael<br />

McKinnie<br />

Digitally signed by Michael McKinnie<br />

DN: cn=Michael McKinnie, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=Department of Drama,<br />

email=m.mckinnie@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 11:03:24 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title THE COURT OF HENRY VIII: THEN AND NOW<br />

Module Code ESH272<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

Q323 English Literature by topic<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 15 15 36<br />

2012/13 15 15 36


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module will be available for students on English <strong>and</strong> all associated programmes <strong>and</strong> Associate students. It will be an<br />

optional module for students primarily in the second year of study. This course is offered to address a shortage of early modern<br />

topics available for students at level 5, with the intention that this will encourage more uptake on early modern topics at level 6<br />

(particularly for Writing Renaissance Lives, which builds upon the the texts <strong>and</strong> topics covered in this module). The topic of the<br />

course addresses the significant interest in the reign of Henry VIII that has been created by fictionalized versions of the monarch<br />

found in recent historical novels, TV <strong>and</strong> film.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

One lecturer; AV equipped teaching room<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title THE COURT OF HENRY VIII: THEN AND NOW<br />

Module Code ESH272<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Ruth Ahnert<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

We all think we know who Henry VIII was. Some of us may have gleaned our impressions of Henry VIII through the novels of<br />

Philippa Gregory <strong>and</strong> Hilary Mantel, the recent television drama The Tudors, or through the exhibitions, events <strong>and</strong> public<br />

lectures that marked the 500th anniversary of Henry’s accession to the throne in 2009. These modern representations of the<br />

Tudor monarch have contributed to a multivalent, but nevertheless popularized, image within the public consciousness of this<br />

monarch <strong>and</strong> the court that surrounded him. This module will introduce you to the origins of this image-making. We will be<br />

examining a number of verbal <strong>and</strong> visual representations of Henry <strong>and</strong> his court dating from the king’s reign, alongside modern<br />

depictions of Henry found in novels, TV dramas <strong>and</strong> film. On a basic level, this will allow you to pinpoint some of the historical<br />

inaccuracies that modern fictionalized accounts have propagated. But it will also allow you to probe the accuracy of<br />

contemporary images of Henry’s court, <strong>and</strong> the extent to which these representations might today be labeled as ‘spin’ or<br />

propag<strong>and</strong>a. In this way the module will explore how the making of an icon is an ongoing process.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This course will:<br />

• Investigate the role of image-making in literature produced in <strong>and</strong> about the Henrician court;<br />

• Consider the relation between contemporary representations of Henry VIII’s court <strong>and</strong> their modern counterparts;<br />

• Consider the power of words <strong>and</strong> images to create a lasting reputation;<br />

• Develop skills in analysing literary, historical <strong>and</strong> artistic artifacts <strong>and</strong> discourses;<br />

• Raise questions about the function <strong>and</strong> perception of popular history;<br />

• Develop your capacity for research, presentation <strong>and</strong> essay writing.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

a range of texts, images <strong>and</strong> cultural artifacts emerging from the Tudor court<br />

the historical <strong>and</strong> political context in which these texts <strong>and</strong> artifacts were produced<br />

modern representations of Henry VIII in fiction, film, <strong>and</strong> popular history<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

evaluate how contemporary representations of the Tudor court compare to retrospective depictions<br />

debate the parallels between the image-making in Henry’s court with modern political ‘spin’<br />

apply this underst<strong>and</strong>ing in independent critical analysis of texts<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Research independently in primary <strong>and</strong> secondary literature <strong>and</strong> marshall evidence to produce an original argument<br />

Present opinions eloquently <strong>and</strong> in a well organised form to peers <strong>and</strong> teachers, both orally <strong>and</strong> in writing<br />

Reflect in a sophisticated manner on own performance <strong>and</strong> those of others, both in discussion <strong>and</strong> in writing


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Undertake independent research, <strong>and</strong> write up findings in an extended essay<br />

Deliver a ten-minute oral presentation<br />

Debate professionally <strong>and</strong> coherently with peers <strong>and</strong> teachers<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Week 1 - Introduction: Images of Henry, from Holbein to Hollywood<br />

• Please prepare by looking at the gallery of images of Henry VIII on the VLE<br />

• Tatiana C. String, ‘Projecting masculinity: Henry VIII’s codpiece’, in Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> his Afterlives: Literature, Politics, <strong>and</strong> Art<br />

(Cambridge, 2009), pp. 143-59<br />

Week 2 - Court Culture I: Music, masques <strong>and</strong> dancing<br />

• Sir Thomas Elyot, The Book Named the Governor (1531), pp. xiii-xiv, 20-26, 69-94<br />

• Skiles Howard, ‘”Ascending the Riche Mount”: Performing Hierarchy <strong>and</strong> Gender in the Henrician Masque’, in Rethinking the<br />

Henrician Era: Essays on Early Tudor Texts <strong>and</strong> Contexts, ed. Peter C. Herman (Urbana <strong>and</strong> Chicago, 1994), pp. 16-39<br />

Week 3 - Court Culture II: Drama<br />

• John Heywood, The Play of the Weather<br />

Week 4 - Reconstructing the Court: class trip to Hampton Court<br />

Week 5 - Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> Anne Boleyn<br />

• Selected verse by Sir Thomas Wyatt<br />

• Eric Ives, The Life <strong>and</strong> Death of Anne Boleyn: The most happy’ (Oxford, 2004), pp. 63-80<br />

Week 6 - Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> Anne Boleyn in popular culture<br />

• The Other Boleyn Girl<br />

Week 7 - R E A D I N G W E E K<br />

Week 8 - Writing Under Tyranny<br />

• Selected verse by John Skelton, Thomas Wyatt, <strong>and</strong> Henry Howard, the Earl of Surrey<br />

• Greg Walker, Writing Under Tyranny: English Literature <strong>and</strong> the Henrician Reformation (Oxford, 2005), pp. 415-432<br />

Week 9 - Henry VIII, Thomas More <strong>and</strong> the Reformation<br />

• Excerpts from Thomas More, The Confutation of Tyndale’s Answer (1532)<br />

• John N. King, ‘Thomas More, William Tyndale, <strong>and</strong> the Printing of Religious Propag<strong>and</strong>a’, in The Oxford H<strong>and</strong>book of Tudor<br />

literature, 1485-1603, ed. Mike Pincombe <strong>and</strong> Cathy Shrank (Oxford, 2009), pp. 105-20.<br />

Week 10 - Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> Thomas More in popular culture<br />

• Selected prison letters by Thomas More<br />

• Peter Marshall, ‘Saints <strong>and</strong> Cinemas: A Man for All Seasons’, in Tudors <strong>and</strong> Stuarts on Film, ed. Susan Doran <strong>and</strong> Thomas S.<br />

Freeman (Basingstoke, 2009), pp. 46-60<br />

Week 11 - Course review <strong>and</strong> discussion of essay plans<br />

Week 12 - Essay consultations


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Most of the course will be delivered in 2-hour lecture-discussions.<br />

‘Lecture-discussion’ just means that the lecturing will be broken up<br />

with periods of class discussion <strong>and</strong> small-group activities (20 hrs).<br />

There will be one trip to Hampton Court (6 hrs).<br />

Individual essay consultations (15 mins) will be provided at the end<br />

of term over weeks 11 <strong>and</strong> 12.<br />

Total number of teaching contact hours: 26.25<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

5-8 hours preparatory reading per week (around 55 hours)<br />

plus approximately 65 hours on assessment<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

146 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

10 minute oral presentation on<br />

set text<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Coursework 10 minutes 10% No n/a<br />

Learning journal, with seven<br />

entries<br />

Coursework<br />

1,400-1,750<br />

words<br />

30% No n/a<br />

Essay Coursework 3,000 words 60% Yes n/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 10:44:28 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title The crisis of culture: literature <strong>and</strong> politics, 1918-1948<br />

Module Code ESH270<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

Q300 English studies<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 50 10 100<br />

2012/13 50 10 100<br />

2013/14 50 10 100


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

To assist the modern Subject Area Group in English to manage better the numbers of students taking its courses across the 3<br />

years of the undergraduate degree, I was asked if I could re-shape The crisis of culture... - previously a Level 6 course - as a Level 5<br />

course. With some adjustments to its content, this is easily possible, <strong>and</strong> so I am withdrawing it as a Level 6 course, <strong>and</strong> reoffering<br />

it as a Level 5 course. The Level 5 version has fewer texts on the syllabus than its Level 6 counterpart, <strong>and</strong> more<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>ing texts have been substituted with ones more appropriate to Level 5.<br />

This module would therefore be offered as an option at Level 5, <strong>and</strong> would be aimed at 2nd year undergraduates (single <strong>and</strong><br />

joint honours) <strong>and</strong> Associate students in the Department of English. It is might also be of interest to students from History <strong>and</strong><br />

Politics departments. It complements, although it does not strictly follow, ESH102 Reading, Theory <strong>and</strong> Interpretation, in that it<br />

picks up the analytical skills acquired in that course. It supplements other level 5 courses such as ESH213 Modernism, ESH261 The<br />

colonial novel (with its attention to 20thC British imperialism), ESH266 World Travellers, <strong>and</strong> ESH256 Writing the First World War.<br />

Taking into account its "political" content, it sets up a pathway to ESH350 Modernism <strong>and</strong> Democracy, as well as anticipating<br />

ESH330 Virginia Woolf, <strong>and</strong> ESH381 Lawrence.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

lecturing staff<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title The crisis of culture: literature <strong>and</strong> politics, 1918-1948<br />

Module Code ESH270<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Katie Fleming<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

The years following the First World War saw dramatic social, cultural, <strong>and</strong> political changes in British life. Despite the radical<br />

global developments which followed the Second World War, the paradigm shift in British cultural life, the sense that one age had<br />

ended, <strong>and</strong> another – darker, more complex, less certain – epoch had begun, occurred in the aftermath of the trench wars in<br />

Europe. This course will explore the ways in which the writers of the period engaged with its turbulent politics.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

• Through a variety of different genres – novels, essays, <strong>and</strong> poems – this course aims to chart this period of political turbulence,<br />

as it was seen, understood, <strong>and</strong> represented by those who lived through <strong>and</strong> participated in it.<br />

• Students will be encouraged to examine <strong>and</strong> critique the complex, often contradictory, politics of the writers they study, <strong>and</strong> to<br />

ask what place the intellectual plays in the formation of a country’s political consciousness, <strong>and</strong> vice versa.<br />

• Students will also be challenged to explore the cultural effects of the politics of the 20s, 30s, <strong>and</strong> 40s: e.g. how did the political<br />

allegiances of the writers of the 1930s transform the literary scene?; how did (anxiety about) Britain’s empire inform the political<br />

l<strong>and</strong>scape?; how did the British political <strong>and</strong> cultural experience differ from that of mainl<strong>and</strong> Europe?<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

a number of authors <strong>and</strong> texts from the period 1918-1948<br />

literary, cultural <strong>and</strong> socio-historical contexts in which the core texts were written <strong>and</strong> read<br />

the relationship between literature <strong>and</strong> politics<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

demonstrate the critical skills of close reading, description, <strong>and</strong> analysis of the core texts of the course<br />

show awareness of how different political <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts affect the nature of writing <strong>and</strong> meaning<br />

comm<strong>and</strong> rhetorical skills of effective communication <strong>and</strong> argument, both oral <strong>and</strong> written<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

analyse <strong>and</strong> critically examine diverse forms of literary-political discourse


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

demonstrate advanced literacy <strong>and</strong> communication skills <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply these in appropriate contexts,<br />

including the ability to present sustained <strong>and</strong> persuasive written <strong>and</strong> oral arguments cogently <strong>and</strong> coherently<br />

acquire substantial quantities of complex information of diverse kinds in a structured <strong>and</strong> systematic way involving<br />

the use of the distinctive interpretative skills of the subject<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

adapt <strong>and</strong> transfer the critical methods of the discipline to a variety of working environments.<br />

demonstrate competence in the planning <strong>and</strong> execution of essays, presentations, <strong>and</strong> other<br />

writing work.<br />

work with <strong>and</strong> in relation to others through the presentation of ideas <strong>and</strong> information <strong>and</strong> the collective negotiation<br />

of solutions<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Week 1: Introductory lecture<br />

Week 2: Disenchantment <strong>and</strong> the aftermath of WWI<br />

Robert Graves, Goodbye to all that<br />

Week 3: Mass <strong>and</strong> elite<br />

F.R. Leavis, "Mass Civilisation <strong>and</strong> Minority Culture"; T.S. Eliot, "Notes towards the definition of culture", "The Idea of a Christian<br />

Society"<br />

Week 4: The crisis of democracy & fascism<br />

Wyndham Lewis, extracts, The Art of Being Ruled; Hitler<br />

Week 5: Militarism & Imperialism<br />

George Orwell, "Shooting an Elephant"; Virginia Woolf, extract, Three Guineas<br />

Week 6: Politics & patriarchy<br />

Virginia Woolf, The Years<br />

Week 7: Reading week<br />

Week 8: Weimar <strong>and</strong> the rise of Nazism<br />

Christopher Isherwood, Goodbye to Berlin<br />

Week 9: The Spanish Civil War<br />

George Orwell, Homage to Catalonia<br />

Week 10: The Munich Crisis<br />

Louis MacNeice, Autumn Journal<br />

Week 11: London <strong>and</strong> the war<br />

Elizabeth Bowen, The Heat of the Day<br />

Week 12: consultations for final essay


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

1 hour lecture followed by 1 hour seminar (22 hours teaching in<br />

total)<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

8 hours reading per week (core text plus secondary material) = 72<br />

hours (2 weeks no assigned reading); 56 hours working on<br />

assessment<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 notional study hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Group in-class presentation<br />

(collaborative)<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Coursework 500 15 No n/a<br />

Book review Coursework 1000 25 No n/a<br />

Final essay Coursework 2500 60 Yes n/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 10:48:54 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />

Module Code ESH388<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

Q300 English studies<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of English & Drama<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

English<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 36 10 54<br />

2012/13 36 10 54<br />

2013/14 36 10 54


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module will be offered at Level 6 to single <strong>and</strong> joint honours undergraduate degree programmes in English <strong>and</strong> Associate<br />

students. It will provide students who have taken modules in early literature with an opportunity to further their interest in the<br />

literature of the seventeenth century. Building on the School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama’s substantial module offerings in the early<br />

period, this module will enable students to gain a deeper underst<strong>and</strong>ing of seventeenth-century culture <strong>and</strong> society by exploring<br />

the reasons for <strong>and</strong> the rationale behind the different kinds of life writing produced in this period.<br />

Students are introduced to the medieval <strong>and</strong> early modern periods in the first year ESH110 Literatures in Time <strong>and</strong> ESH101<br />

Shakespeare modules.<br />

Biographies <strong>and</strong> auto-biographies abound in modern culture, from best-seller lists to the cinema screen, but the term ‘biography’<br />

is a late-seventeenth-century departure from the early modern experience of fashioning the self. This module seeks to explore<br />

early modern selfhood as written, perceived <strong>and</strong> experienced, <strong>and</strong> takes as the focus of its study all such early modern forms of<br />

life writing as narrative, performance, story <strong>and</strong> text.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Lecturer<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />

Module Code ESH388<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Tamara Atkin<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module explores some of the ways in which some seventeenth-century lives were given recorded shape in texts <strong>and</strong><br />

documents. It works with both historical records <strong>and</strong> literary constructions, <strong>and</strong> investigates the different imperatives which<br />

prompted the literary construction of selfhood <strong>and</strong> identity in a variety of patterns. There will be opportunities to consider<br />

influential ideas <strong>and</strong> modes of life writing <strong>and</strong> to question some aspects of the wider theorizing of biographical <strong>and</strong><br />

autobiographical writing as they relate to the early modern period (the notion of renaissance self-fashioning, for example). Texts<br />

studied will include wills, letters, personal memoirs, diaries, martyrologies, poems, <strong>and</strong> plays.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

1. To gain a deeper underst<strong>and</strong>ing of seventeenth-century texts by exploring a range of different forms of life writing<br />

2. To consider the various incarnations of selfhood in the seventeenth century<br />

3. To develop skills in analyzing literary, historical, <strong>and</strong> artistic artefacts <strong>and</strong> discourses<br />

4. To build students’ capacity for research, presentation, <strong>and</strong> essay writing<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A variety of different genres of seventeenth-century life writing<br />

The cultural context for the concepts of selfhood in the seventeenth-century<br />

Current critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical discussions about the construction of selfhood in the seventeenth century<br />

The connections <strong>and</strong> distinctions between different writers, genres, texts, <strong>and</strong> periods<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

Grasp the wider cultural, social, historical, <strong>and</strong> ethical implications of the subject of the module<br />

Engage with <strong>and</strong> develop critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical modes of inquiry<br />

H<strong>and</strong>le <strong>and</strong> deploy relevant concepts, contexts, <strong>and</strong> terminology<br />

Describe, analyze, <strong>and</strong> evaluate primary <strong>and</strong> secondary texts<br />

Transferable skills - able to:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

C 5<br />

Write persuasively <strong>and</strong> critically<br />

Communicate <strong>and</strong> present ideas orally<br />

Effectively organize <strong>and</strong> manage time<br />

Work towards deadlines<br />

Engage in <strong>and</strong> contribute to discussions, debates, <strong>and</strong> projects with peers<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

Apply critical thinking to an independently developed research project<br />

Compile a bibliography<br />

Identify the most relevant arguments, evidence, <strong>and</strong> resources in both primary <strong>and</strong> secondary material<br />

Make effective use of library <strong>and</strong> computer resources <strong>and</strong> research aids<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

The reading for this course will consist predominantly of primary texts, which will be supplemented by extracts from secondary<br />

critical <strong>and</strong> historical material. Primary texts will include the following:<br />

Week 1 - Introduction - Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives - No primary reading<br />

Week 2 - Literary Lives I<br />

Ben Jonson, selection from The Complete Poems, ed. by George Parfitt (1988)<br />

Week 3 - Literary Lives II<br />

Fulke Greville, Life of Sir Philip Sidney, Etc., First Published 1652 (2010)<br />

Week 4 - Lives in Brief<br />

Aubrey's Brief Lives, ed. by Oliver Lawson Dick (1972)<br />

Week 5 - Women's Life Writing I<br />

Margaret Cavendish, 'A True Relation of my Birth, Breeding, Life', in <strong>Paper</strong> Bodies: A Margaret Cavendish Reader, ed. by<br />

Sylvia Bowerbank <strong>and</strong> Sara Mendelson (2000)<br />

Week 6 - Women's Life Writing II<br />

The Diaries of Lady Anne Clifford, ed. by D. J. H. Clifford (1992)<br />

Week 7 - READING WEEK<br />

Week 8 - Spiritual Autobiography<br />

Agnes Beaumont, 'The Narrative of the Persecution of Agnes Beaumont', in Grace Abounding with Other Spiritual<br />

Autobiographies, ed. by John Stachniewski (2008<br />

John Bunyan, 'Grace Abounding', in Grace Abounding with Other Spiritual Autobiographies, ed. by John Stachniewski<br />

(2008)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

Week 9 - Diarizing Lives<br />

John Beadle, A Journal or Diary of a Thankful Christian, ed. by Germaine Fry Murray (1996)<br />

The Diary of Samuel Pepys: A Selection, ed. by Robert Latham (2003)<br />

Week 10 - Majestic Lives<br />

Francis Bacon, The History of the Reign of King Henry VII, ed. by Brian Vickers (1998)<br />

Week 11 - Transforming Lives<br />

Robert Daborne, 'A Christian Turned Turk', in Three Turk Plays from Early Modern Engl<strong>and</strong>, ed. by Daniel J. Vitkus (2000)<br />

Thomas Warmstry, The Baptized Turk, EEBO edition<br />

Week 12 - Lives in Pictures<br />

Visit to the National Portrait Gallery


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

11 seminars (22 hours in total), 1 museum visit (2 hours in total).<br />

Total student/lecturer interactive time: 24 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Total student independent learning time: 126 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

Total module notional study time: 150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

11 x 200-500<br />

word entries<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Log Book<br />

Coursework<br />

30 No N/A<br />

Researched Essay Coursework 3000 words 70 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Chris Reid<br />

Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />

DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />

email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.08 18:40:01 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Module Proposal(s)<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Brazilian Cities in Cinema<br />

Ethnography of Communication (Level 6)<br />

Ethnography of Communication ((Level 7)<br />

Experimental Linguistics<br />

Linguistic Typology <strong>and</strong> Grammatical Theory<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

No significant issues identified.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Brazilian Cities in Cinema: Towards the Olympics <strong>and</strong> the World Cup<br />

Module Code POR4<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

R590 Portuguese studies not elsewhere classified<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

N/a<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

N/A<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Hispanic Studies<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 20 6 40<br />

2012/13 25 6 40<br />

2013/14 30 6 40


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module will be an option for students of Hispanic Studies <strong>and</strong>/or Portuguese, <strong>and</strong> available to other students in SLLF,<br />

especially Film Studies.<br />

It will replace the current module POR101 Brazilian Cultural Studies, shifting the emphasis to the medium of cinema. It explores<br />

the link between city <strong>and</strong> cinema (eg Shiel <strong>and</strong> Fitzmaurice), enhancing the interdisciplinarity with Film Studies which makes<br />

Lusophone studies in the School distinctive in the UK, has attracted more funding <strong>and</strong> generated more innovative research. The<br />

shift also paves the way for a future programme proposal for joint honours BA in Portuguese <strong>and</strong> Film Studies.<br />

São Paulo, a major chunk of this module, had never been taught before; this further implies the inclusion of the agenda of<br />

globalization. History is another component of this proposal which further broadens the time span from the 19th century to the<br />

present day. It broadens the focus on Rio beyond music. Salvador's Afro-Brazilian culture (C<strong>and</strong>omblé <strong>and</strong> Capoeira) is also seen<br />

as conflict through the lens of Cinema Novo. What remains close to POR101 is Brasília.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Existing Brazilian Studies <strong>and</strong> Film Studies facilities<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Brazilian Cities in Cinema: Towards the Olympics <strong>and</strong> the World Cup<br />

Module Code POR4<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Professor Else R. P. Vieira<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module introduces students to the way cinema represents four Brazilian cities: a) Rio de Janeiro: its wonders, exoticism <strong>and</strong><br />

the spectacle of its Carnival contrasting with the over-sensationalized violence on the screen; its unique status as the seat of the<br />

Portuguese monarchy <strong>and</strong> colony in the 19th Century; b) São Paulo: social mobility <strong>and</strong> stagnation in the complexity of a city the<br />

size of Lebanon; the impact of technology <strong>and</strong> traffic on its social networks; the Gardens <strong>and</strong> financial high-rises of the epicentre<br />

of an emerging global power contrasting with underclass pockets; its industrialization in the 1950s <strong>and</strong> 1960s, <strong>and</strong> the rise of the<br />

Labour Unions' political power; c) Salvador: its vibrant Afro-Brazilian culture contrasting with Cinema Novo's depiction of power<br />

hierarchies <strong>and</strong> cultural conflicts; d) Brasília: projections of utopia in the urban planning of Brazil's Modernist capital.<br />

No previous knowledge of Portuguese is required, as all the films studied are available in English or with English subtitles.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The module aims to<br />

1) Introduce the history <strong>and</strong> culture of four Brazilian cities through their representation in cinema;<br />

2) Analyse achievements <strong>and</strong> tensions informing Brazil as an emerging power;<br />

3) Develop students' awareness of the way film creates certain images of cities;<br />

4) Develop students' awareness of film as interpretation of culture;<br />

5) Assess the achievements of Brazilian film directors <strong>and</strong> otherwise (eg Camus) in portraying Brazilian culture.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

A 4<br />

A 5<br />

Brazilian Culture;<br />

Brazilian cities <strong>and</strong> their regional <strong>and</strong> historical specificities;<br />

Essential terminology <strong>and</strong> key concepts related to Brazilian culture;<br />

The role of film in projecting the culture of specific cities;<br />

The film language developed by film directors to portray urban Brazilian Culture ;<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

B 4<br />

B 5<br />

B 6<br />

Critically assess the achievement of film as interpretation of culture;<br />

Identify the specificities of Brazilian cities <strong>and</strong> culture in different regions<br />

Situate Brazil in the context of the globalized world.<br />

Develop an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the specificities of global cities<br />

Assess gaps in academic <strong>and</strong> filmic representations of Brazilian major cities<br />

Analyse the impact of historical events on the configuration of today's cities


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

C 4<br />

Research <strong>and</strong> synthesise relevant information from cultural theorists with appropriate citation<br />

Research <strong>and</strong> synthesise relevant information from film scholarship on cinematrographic cities with appropriate<br />

citation<br />

Develop a coherent argument <strong>and</strong> exercise critical judgement<br />

Work independently, demonstrating initiative, self-organisation <strong>and</strong> time-management<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

Argue <strong>and</strong> communicate perceptions through essays.<br />

Research information on the internet<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Set Films (equivalent films can also be used)<br />

"1808" (Laurentino Gomes, 2008) on Rio as a the seat of the Portuguese Monarchy<br />

"Black Orpheus" (1959, Camus) on the favela culture of Rio in the 1950s<br />

"Bossa Nova" (Bruno Barreto, 2000) on Rio´s upper class beach <strong>and</strong> culture in the 1960s<br />

"Pure Brazil: Bossa Nova in Rio" (João Elias Ribeiro Jr, 2007)<br />

"City of Men" (Fern<strong>and</strong>o Meirelles, 2002-05) <strong>and</strong>/or Maré (Lúcia Murat, 2008) on today´s social gaps <strong>and</strong> favelas:<br />

Clips from " The Payer of Promises (Anselmo Duarte, 1962) on the conflicts of cultural syncretism in Salvador<br />

"Dona Flor <strong>and</strong> her two Husb<strong>and</strong>s" (Bruno Barreto, 1976) on Salvador´s religious syncretism <strong>and</strong> on mal<strong>and</strong>roism<br />

"Brasília 18%" (Nelson Pereira dos Santos, 2006); <strong>and</strong> documentaries on Brasília's Modernism <strong>and</strong> its tensions<br />

"All for Nothing" (Philippe Barcinsky, 2007), on São Paulo <strong>and</strong> its traffic <strong>and</strong> technology<br />

"Motoboys " (Caíto Ortiz, 2002) on São Paulo <strong>and</strong> its traffic<br />

"The Sign of the City" (Carlos Alberto Riccelli, 2007) on São Paulo, technology-enhanced networks of solidarity<br />

" Linha de Passe" (Walter Salles, 2008) on the survival strategies of the lower class<br />

"The ABC of Strikes" (Leon Hirzman, 1979/1990) <strong>and</strong>/or "Lula. the Son of Brazil" (Fábio Barreto, 2009) on São Paulo's Unionism<br />

RELEVANT CHAPTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING BOOKS WILL BE USED:<br />

Reference Books:<br />

*Skidmore, Thomas E. Brazil, Five Centuries of Change. OUP, 1999.<br />

*Da Mata, Roberto. Carnival, Rogues <strong>and</strong> Heroes: Interpretation of the Brazilian Dilemma. Transl. John DruryRio de Janeiro: Rocco,<br />

1997.. University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.<br />

*Freyre, Gilberto. Masters <strong>and</strong> Slaves: A Study in the Development of Brazilian Civilization. Transl. Rod W. Horton. Greenwood<br />

Publishing Group, 1980.<br />

*Santos, M. A urbanização brasileira. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1993.<br />

*Schwarz, Roberto. Misplaced Ideas: Essays on Brazilian Culture. Transl <strong>and</strong> introduced by John Gledson. Verso, 1996<br />

Specific Books<br />

*Castro, Ruy. Bossa Nova: The Story of the Brazilian Music that Seduced the World. A Capella Books, 2000.<br />

*McGowan, Chris <strong>and</strong> Pessanha, Ricardo. The Brazilian Sound: Bossa Nova <strong>and</strong> the Popular Music of Brazil. Temple UP, 1997.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />

*Harding, Rachel E. A Refuge in Thunder: C<strong>and</strong>omblé <strong>and</strong> Alternative Spaces of Blackness. Indiana University Press, 2000.<br />

*Hanchard, Micahel. Racial politics in contemporary Brazil. Durham: Duke University Press, 1999.<br />

*Kraay, Heindreik. Afro-Brazilian Culture <strong>and</strong> Politics: Bahia, 1790s to 1990. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc., 1998.<br />

*Holston, James. The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasília. University of Chicago Press, 1989.<br />

*James, P. E. Rio de Janeiro <strong>and</strong> São Paulo. Geographical Review. 23(2):271-98.<br />

*Kowarick, Lúcio. Social Struggles <strong>and</strong> the City: The Case of São Paulo. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1993.<br />

*Underwood, David Kendrick. Oscar Niemeyer <strong>and</strong> Brazilian Free-Form Modernism. George Braziller Publishers, 1994.<br />

*Nagib, Lúcia (ed). The New Brazilian Cinema. London <strong>and</strong> New York: I.B.Taurus, 2003.<br />

*Vieira, Else R P (ed). City of God in Several Voices: Brazilian Social Cinema as Social Action. Nottingham: CCC Press, 2005.<br />

*Sassen, S. A Sociology of Globalization. London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2007.<br />

*Sassen, S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1991.<br />

Cohen, R. And Kennedy, P. Gobal Sociology. London: Macmillan, 2000.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures (1 hour per week)<br />

Seminars (1 hour per week)<br />

Film Screening sessions (1 hour per week)<br />

Individual <strong>and</strong> collective feedback sessions as required<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

117<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Essay Coursework 1,500 words 40% No N/a<br />

Essay Coursework 2,500 words 60% Yes N/a<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Essay 2 Coursework 2500 words<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Ruediger<br />

Goerner<br />

Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />

DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />

Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />

email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.11 10:30:40 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />

Module Code LIN6<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Q140 Sociolinguistics<br />

Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 30 6 40<br />

2012/13 30 6 40<br />

2013/14 30 6 40


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This is an optional module for the BA programmes offered through the Linguistics Department (English Language <strong>and</strong><br />

Linguistics, English Literature <strong>and</strong> Linguistics, Comparative Literature <strong>and</strong> Linguistics, <strong>and</strong> [X] Language <strong>and</strong> Linguistics). It has<br />

been running since 2002 as a Level 5 module (LIN006) in connection with a follow-on Level 6 module (LIN307).<br />

The module introduces students to an important area of linguistic research (the ethnolinguistic/linguistic anthropological<br />

framework) which examines communication patterns within groups in society, focusing on the ways language <strong>and</strong> social<br />

meanings are understood by its speakers.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />

Module Code LIN6<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Colleen Cotter<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

LIN400, LIN102; or permission of<br />

instructor<br />

LIN006; LINtbc-level7<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module provides an overview of ethnography of communication, a theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological approach to analyzing<br />

<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing a wide range of communicative patterns <strong>and</strong> language uses as they occur within social <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts.<br />

Students will also apply ethnographic insights <strong>and</strong> methodologies to fieldwork activities <strong>and</strong> projects in the local community,<br />

investigating the range of practices that constitute ethnographic research, aiming for an integrative <strong>and</strong> holistic underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

through discussion of class members’ fieldwork activities.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

1) To develop underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the framework<br />

2) To become familiar with the primary literature<br />

3) To engage in fieldwork activities <strong>and</strong> learn how to conduct them<br />

4) To critically assess field data in relation to the concepts from the readings<br />

5) To learn how to maintain an annotated bibliography <strong>and</strong> develop a field notebook<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

ethnography of communication as a linguistic framework<br />

theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological tenets behind the framework<br />

what constitutes ethnographic fieldwork<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

critically consider the relationship between theory, method, <strong>and</strong> data<br />

develop a research project with a London focus<br />

assess fieldwork practice as well as data<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

conduct field interviews<br />

develop collegial relationships<br />

talk about one's research


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

talk to members of the public <strong>and</strong> present complex ideas to outsiders (academic <strong>and</strong> otherwise)<br />

conduct semi-structured interviews<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2003. The Ethnography of Communication (Wiley-Blackwell)<br />

Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, <strong>and</strong> Work in Communities <strong>and</strong> Classrooms (CUP)<br />

Agar, Michael. 1986. Speaking of Ethnography (Sage)<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

A combination of lecture/seminar (2 hours) each week. Towards the<br />

end students apply insights from their own fieldwork in relation to<br />

the literature, culminating in a poster session.<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Students will spend 6-8 hours each week reading <strong>and</strong> taking notes<br />

on the primary literature discussed in class as well as engaging in<br />

independent student fieldwork <strong>and</strong> writing up field notes<br />

(approximately 3-5 hours/week) in the second half of the semester.<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

field homeworks Coursework 1500 words 50% No NA<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

field notebook, essay Coursework 2500 words 50% Yes NA<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Essay that synthesizes <strong>and</strong> applies concepts Coursework 2000 words<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Ruediger<br />

Goerner<br />

Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />

DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />

Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />

email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.02.03 12:40:13 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />

Module Code LIN7<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />

Q140 Sociolinguistics<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 6 30<br />

2012/13 12 6 30<br />

2013/14 15 6 30


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This is an optional module for the MA in linguistics. The module will introduce students to an important area of linguistic<br />

research (the Ethnography of Communication framework) that examines language <strong>and</strong> culture in t<strong>and</strong>em, focusing on the ways<br />

social meaning is instantiated in language <strong>and</strong> understood by its speakers.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Appropriate teaching space with AV connections; VLE; updated library resources<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />

Module Code LIN7<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr Colleen Cotter<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

LIN006, LINtbc-Level6<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module provides an overview of Ethnography of Communication, a theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological approach to analyzing<br />

<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing communicative patterns <strong>and</strong> language use in social <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts. The focus on primary literature<br />

includes the seminal figures who established the approach (e.g., Hymes, Gumperz), developed the framework (Baumann, Briggs,<br />

Ervin-Tripp, Philipps), <strong>and</strong> who continue to advance it today (Duranti, Goodwin, Hill, Rampton). Applying ethnographic insights<br />

<strong>and</strong> methodologies to fieldwork activities <strong>and</strong> projects in the local community will instill underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the broad range of<br />

practices that constitute doing ethnography as well as illustrate the points raised in the literature.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

(i) To develop familiarity with the key literature.<br />

(ii) To learn to maintain an ongoing annotated bibliography.<br />

(iii) To apply theoretical concepts from the readings to local field research contexts.<br />

(iv) To make students familiar with the ethnographic approach to analyzing language in social contexts.<br />

(v) To provide students with an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of a major thread of sociolinguistic research.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

key aspects of ethnography of communication<br />

relationships among language, context, <strong>and</strong> culture -- for the linguist <strong>and</strong> for the researched<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

assess theoretical approach <strong>and</strong> argument<br />

construct evidence-based arguments<br />

deal with fieldwork issues alongside analytical ones<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

conduct independent learning via the primary literature<br />

make contact with prospective field consultants in the community<br />

C 3


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

present complex ideas to a professional audience<br />

talk to members of the public (through fieldwork interactions <strong>and</strong> dissemination of research)<br />

maintain an annotated bibliography<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Agar, Michael. 1996. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (<strong>Academic</strong> Press)<br />

Bauman, Richard <strong>and</strong> Joel Sherzer. 1989. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (CUP)<br />

Briggs, Charles. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research (CUP)<br />

Duranti, Aless<strong>and</strong>ro. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology (CUP)<br />

Duranti, Aless<strong>and</strong>ro. 2001. Key Terms in Language <strong>and</strong> Culture (Wiley-Blackwell)<br />

Emerson, Robert et al. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (U Chicago Press)<br />

Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, <strong>and</strong> Work in Communities <strong>and</strong> Classrooms (CUP)<br />

Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2003. Ethnography of Communication (Wiley-Blackwell)<br />

Articles in Language in Society (primary journal)<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

A combination of lecture (2 hours) <strong>and</strong> seminar (1 hour) each week.<br />

In seminars, students will be expected to discuss themes <strong>and</strong> issues<br />

from readings. Towards the end of the module, students will also<br />

lead some discussions in lectures that relate to the core literature, as<br />

well as applying insights from their own field contexts in relation to<br />

theory, methodology, <strong>and</strong> data.<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Each week, students should spend about 10 hours reading <strong>and</strong><br />

taking notes on the primary literature discussed in the class.<br />

Towards the end of the module, this will include 3-4 hours spent in<br />

preparing their presentations.<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

field homeworks, journal Coursework 1500 words 40% No NA<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

essay with annotated<br />

bibliography<br />

Coursework 2500 words 50% Yes NA<br />

seminar presentation/poster Coursework NA 10% No NA<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Essay that synthesizes <strong>and</strong> applies concepts Coursework 4000 words<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Ruediger<br />

Goerner<br />

Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />

DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />

Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />

email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.02.03 12:41:46 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Experimental Linguistics<br />

Module Code LIN6..<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Q150 Psycholinguistics<br />

Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

SLLF<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 12 6 24<br />

2012/13 16 6 24<br />

2013/14 20 6 24


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

This module is an optional final year module, designed to be particularly useful to any students considering using experimental<br />

tools for their dissertations. The module provides students with a concrete grounding in the tools <strong>and</strong> methods of Experimental<br />

Linguistics, which will enable them to design, implement <strong>and</strong> analyze experiments of their own <strong>and</strong> to engage with the<br />

published Psycholinguistics literature. Experimental tools <strong>and</strong> techniques are increasingly being adopted by theoretical <strong>and</strong><br />

socio-linguists to address critical research questions.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Appropriate teaching space. VLE access. Update of library resources. Access to<br />

Experimental Linguistics lab (including computers designated for experimental<br />

design <strong>and</strong> analysis).<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Experimental Linguistics<br />

Module Code LIN6..<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Linnaea Stockall<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

The goal of this module is to take students with no prior training in the methods or tools of experimental psychological science<br />

<strong>and</strong> provide them with the theoretical <strong>and</strong> practical training required to be able to critically engage with the Psycholinguistics<br />

literature <strong>and</strong> to undertake experimental linguistics research themselves. The module will include h<strong>and</strong>s-on training in inferential<br />

statistics <strong>and</strong> hypothesis testing, experimental design, data collection (including training in ethical human subjects research<br />

protocols), <strong>and</strong> data analysis. The module will also engage students in considering strengths <strong>and</strong> limitations of various kinds of<br />

linguistics data, <strong>and</strong> how multiple sources of data <strong>and</strong> methods of data collection can be combined to enhance underst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />

Students will develop their critical reading skills <strong>and</strong> gain practice in presenting primary source literature to their peers.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

(i) To give students the background <strong>and</strong> the skills to tackle primary advanced psycholinguistics literature.<br />

(ii) To give students the theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> practical experience necessary to design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyse linguistic<br />

experiments<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

A4<br />

probability theory, inferential statistics <strong>and</strong> hypothesis testing<br />

the research methods of experimental psychology (research design, human subjects ethics, data collection tools <strong>and</strong> data<br />

analysis procedures)<br />

the connections between language <strong>and</strong> other human cognitive capacities (memory, decision making, sensory percetion,<br />

etc)<br />

the core research areas <strong>and</strong> results in the field of experimental linguistics<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

assess research methods <strong>and</strong> results reported in the literature <strong>and</strong> the theories that are argued for on the basis of these<br />

results<br />

conceptualize possible experiments to address theoretical issues<br />

deal with complex issues spanning divergent literatures<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyse linguistic experiments<br />

lead critical group discussions of the primary technical literature


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />

C 3<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

present complex theoretical material to a professional audience<br />

develop project management skills<br />

develop skills in interacting professionally with research participants<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Marantz (2005) Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistics Review<br />

Schütze (2004) Thinking about what we are asking speakers to do. in Kepser & Reis (eds) Linguistic Evidence: Empirical,<br />

Theoretical, <strong>and</strong> Computational Perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter<br />

Phillips (2001) Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception. Cognition<br />

Pylkkänen <strong>and</strong> Marantz (2003) Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Science.<br />

Sprouse. (2007) Continuous Acceptability , Categorical Grammaticality , <strong>and</strong> Experimental Syntax. Syntax.<br />

Pylkkänen <strong>and</strong> McElree (2006) The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. in Traxler &<br />

Gernsbacher (eds.), H<strong>and</strong>book of Psycholinguistics (2nd Ed). NY: Elsevier.<br />

Frank et al. (2008) Number as a cognitive technology: evidence from Pirahã language <strong>and</strong> cognition. Cognition.<br />

Vasishth <strong>and</strong> Broe (2009)The foundations of statistics: A simulation-based approach. Springer


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

A mix of lecture <strong>and</strong> seminar within the same 2 hour teaching block.<br />

Students will be presented with explanations of the more technical<br />

aspects of the material, but will be expected to discuss the more<br />

conceptual parts. Groups of two to three students will work together<br />

to lead the course discussion of one of the assigned readings <strong>and</strong><br />

provide a critical discussion of the argumentation, methods <strong>and</strong><br />

analysis, drawing on their developing underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the theory<br />

<strong>and</strong> practice of experimental linguistics.<br />

For each week, the students should be spending about 4-6 hours<br />

reading <strong>and</strong> taking notes on the primary literature discussed in the<br />

class, <strong>and</strong> an additional 2-4hrs completing the practical assignments<br />

associated with each stage of their research project. During the<br />

week they lead the class discussion, they will work further hours<br />

(another 3-4) in preparing their presentation. A similar additional<br />

work load of (4-5) hours, will be required during the last few weeks<br />

of the semester to complete the write up of their experimental<br />

results.<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

over the course<br />

of the semester<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyze a<br />

linguistic experiment<br />

Coursework<br />

50% No n/a<br />

lead the class discussion (in<br />

collaboration with a classmate)<br />

on an assigned reading <strong>and</strong> write<br />

up a short synopsis (individual<br />

writeup). Assessment is of written<br />

work, not of presentation.<br />

Coursework<br />

1hr discussion +<br />

1000 words<br />

writeup<br />

20% No n/a<br />

write up critical assessment of<br />

experimental results<br />

Coursework 2000 words 30% Yes n/a


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyze a linguistic experiment<br />

<strong>and</strong> write up critical assessment of experimental results<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Coursework<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

2000 word writeup<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Ruediger<br />

Goerner<br />

Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />

DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />

Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />

email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 16:19:44 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Linguistic Typology <strong>and</strong> Grammatical Theory<br />

Module Code LIN5..<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

Q100 Linguistics<br />

Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

SLLF<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 30 6 40


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

LIN403 (Languages of the World) introduces students at level 4 to the notion that linguistic variation, while hugely diverse,<br />

conforms to a number of typological patterns, <strong>and</strong> allows them to undertake a highly structured <strong>and</strong> guided mini research<br />

project on a particular language. This module follows on from LIN403, introducing theoretical rather than purely descriptive<br />

analytical tools, <strong>and</strong> allowing students to develop a research project on a single language or a comparative research project on a<br />

number of languages. The project is still closely guided, but it will be for the student to use their ongoing findings to determine<br />

the course of the research project. This then leads on, optionally, to LIN312 (Unfamiliar languages) where students work directly<br />

with a consultant in the class in a much less structured way, so that they use their own expertise to guide the elicitation<br />

methodology.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

a large enough room, with beamer, whiteboard, screen <strong>and</strong> movable tables (for<br />

group work)<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Linguistic Typology <strong>and</strong> Grammatical Theory<br />

Module Code LIN5..<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

David Adger/Linnaea Stockall<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

LIN403, LIN400<br />

LIN037<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This is a module about language universals <strong>and</strong> linguistic typology. In it you will extend the descriptive knowledge you gained in<br />

LIN403 (Languages of the World) <strong>and</strong> learn how the descriptive categories connect to theoretical models of language variation.<br />

We will cover a subset of word order, grammatical functions, case marking, relative clauses, causative constructions, lexicalization<br />

parameters, the organization of the noun phrase, prepositional syntax, morphophonological variation. The assessment is mainly<br />

by a research project where you will work with native speakers of languages to investigate some typological property of interest.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This module deepens students' descriptive <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge of the languages of the wider world (contributing to the<br />

QM graduate attribute of having a global perspective), increases their capacity to undertake independent project work (research<br />

capacity), <strong>and</strong> the interaction with their consultant will increase their capacity to deal with others <strong>and</strong> to modify their approach<br />

given what they discover (continuous learning responding to change). Of course it also deepens their engagement with<br />

knowledge (especially descriptive <strong>and</strong> theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of unfamiliar categories) <strong>and</strong> contributes to their general<br />

intellectual development.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A1<br />

A2<br />

A3<br />

A4<br />

language universals: notions of grammatical function, linear order, long distance dependency<br />

linguistic typology: notions of variation in morphophonology, morphosyntax<br />

grammatical theory, especially morphosyntactic theory<br />

typological vs theoretical approaches to typological variation<br />

Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

apply descriptive categories to new data<br />

develop generalizations about patterns in comparative data<br />

connect empirical generalizations to theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

work with a consultant<br />

present findings in a clear <strong>and</strong> coherent fashion, comporting with the st<strong>and</strong>ards of the field


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />

C 3<br />

keep an organized record of research findings in the form of a fieldbook<br />

Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

D 4<br />

D 5<br />

interview consultants in a professional manner<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> ethical issues in consultant work<br />

organize records of data<br />

organize presentation of data<br />

write reports<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Baker, M <strong>and</strong> McCloskey, J (2007) On the relationship of typology to theoretical syntaxLinguistic Typology 11, 285–296.<br />

Bickel, Balthasar (2007). Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic<br />

Typology 11: 239–251.<br />

Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals <strong>and</strong> Linguistic Typology: Syntax <strong>and</strong> Morphology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell<br />

Publishers.<br />

Foley, William A., Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax <strong>and</strong> Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

Greenberg, J. H. 1974. Language typology: a historical <strong>and</strong> analytic overview. Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 184 The Hague <strong>and</strong><br />

Paris: Mouton.<br />

Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles, Moravcsik, Edith A., eds. 1978. Universals of Human Language, 4 Volumes. Stanford:<br />

Stanford University Press.<br />

Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie (eds.) (2005). The World Atlas<br />

of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />

Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, Honnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of<br />

Chicago Press.<br />

Hopper, Paul J., Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

Hyman, Larry M., Schuh, Russell G. 1974. Universals of tone rules: evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry 5:81-115.<br />

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1991. Functional explanation in linguistics <strong>and</strong> the origin of language. Language <strong>and</strong> Communication<br />

11:3-28.<br />

Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1992. Iconicity <strong>and</strong> generative grammar. Language 68:756-796.<br />

Nichols, Johanna. 1986. On form <strong>and</strong> content in typology. Language typology 1985, ed. W. P. Lehmann, pp. 141-162. Amsterdam<br />

<strong>and</strong> Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.<br />

Polinsky, Maria & Robert Kluender (2007). Linguistic typology <strong>and</strong> theory construction: Common<br />

challenges ahead. Linguistic Typology 11: 273–283.<br />

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Heine, Bernd. 1991. Aspects of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lecture/Seminar time will concentrate on the core descriptive<br />

categories, their implications for theoretical modelling,<br />

methodological issues (ethics, fieldwork etiquette, recording <strong>and</strong><br />

organizing data). This should be about 2 hours per week.<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

8-10 hours per week at the start of the course will be spent reading<br />

the set papers, consultant interview time, writing up interview notes,<br />

this will then rise by 3-4 hours towards the end of the course with<br />

the extra time being spent applying theoretical models to interview<br />

data, writing up the project,<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Final element<br />

of assessment?<br />

lit review of research topic Coursework 1500 25 No None<br />

Qualifying<br />

Mark<br />

Research project data report Coursework 2500 75 Yes None<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Research project data report Coursework 2500<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Ruediger<br />

Goerner<br />

Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />

DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />

Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />

email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 15:59:27 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Module Proposal<br />

School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />

Design for Human Interaction<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

The proposal requires the signature from the Head of School.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Design for Human Interaction<br />

Module Code DCS059<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

G400 Computer Science<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

None.<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

Computer Science Undergraduate SEB<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 10 5 15<br />

2012/13 10 5 15<br />

2013/14 10 5 15


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Developments in information technology have radically altered the nature of human communication leading to the emergence<br />

of new structures <strong>and</strong> forms of communication. The most successful contemporary applications of computing technology (e.g.<br />

Twitter, Facebook <strong>and</strong> Flikr) depend on creating <strong>and</strong> exploiting new kinds of human communication, in turn creating new social<br />

economies ('crowdsourcing', 'prosumers', 'GPL licensing') . Technologies such as embodied robotics <strong>and</strong> virtual avatars have a<br />

particularly direct reliance on exploiting <strong>and</strong> enhancing different forms of embodied human interaction.<br />

Currently, we do not have theories that can predict how new technologies might enrich or enhance human interaction <strong>and</strong><br />

we lack the tools <strong>and</strong> techniques necessary for a principled approach to the design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of these systems. This<br />

research-led course explores these issues by introducing psychological theories of the nature of human communication <strong>and</strong><br />

socio-historical perspectives on the development <strong>and</strong> impact of communication technologies. These models are applied to the<br />

analysis of new communications technologies <strong>and</strong> the effects of those technologies on communication patterns between<br />

individuals, groups <strong>and</strong> societies.<br />

This module introduces a variety of different technologies ranging from systems for the support of tightly-coupled synchronous<br />

interactions through to large-scale mass interactions with groups such as audiences. Detailed studies of the effects of different<br />

technologies on task performance, communication processes <strong>and</strong> user satisfaction are reviewed. Particular attention is paid to<br />

the notion of communicative success <strong>and</strong> to the development of metrics that can be used in assessing it. Frameworks for<br />

analysing the communicative properties of different media will be introduced as well as approaches to the analysis of<br />

communication in groups <strong>and</strong> organisations.<br />

This is an optional module already offered at level 7 on some EECS Masters programmes. We are now proposing a level 6 version<br />

of the module to be offered as an optional module on G400 BSc Computer Science <strong>and</strong> the proposed new programme BSc(Eng)<br />

Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology. In addition, the School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences intend to offer the level 6 module as<br />

an option on their BSc Psychology.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

Lecture Theatre. Video cameras <strong>and</strong> microphones for fieldwork.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

None.<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Design for Human Interaction<br />

Module Code DCS059<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Professor Partick G. T. Healey<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None None DCS318 Interaction Design


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

Technology can support new forms of human communication. Embodied robotics, virtual avatars <strong>and</strong> social software<br />

applications (e.g. Twitter, Facebook <strong>and</strong> Flikr) create new forms of human interaction <strong>and</strong> new social economies ('crowdsourcing',<br />

'prosumers', 'GPL licensing').<br />

This research-led course introduces psychological theories of human communication that help us to underst<strong>and</strong> how technology<br />

can enrich <strong>and</strong> transform human interaction. It also introduces the tools <strong>and</strong> techniques necessary for a principled approach to<br />

the design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of such technology.<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

To survey the impact on human communication of developments in information technology.<br />

To demonstrate the central importance of human communication for the design of effective information technologies.<br />

To explore the potential application of theories of human communication for the analysis of information technologies.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

The impact of contemporary technology on human communication.<br />

The theories of grounding, turn-taking <strong>and</strong> repair that underpin successful human interaction.<br />

The use of the body in face-to-face human interaction in a shared space.<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

Analyse the interactional organisation of face-to-face conversations <strong>and</strong> identify the critical points in an interaction.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Evaluate the strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses of a new communication technology.<br />

Propose designs for new or adapted technologies<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Use a critical awareness of the way people communicate that can be adapted to a range of situations<br />

Construct <strong>and</strong> evaluate an argument<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

Identify appropriate technical infrastructures for different forms of collaboration<br />

Identify the basic conversation analytic phenomena in transcribed dialogues<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Clark, H.H. (1996). "Using Language" Cambridge University Press.<br />

Heath, C. <strong>and</strong> Luff, P. (2000) 'Technology in Action'. Cambridge University Press.<br />

Levinson, S.C. (1983) 'Pragmatics' Cambridge University Press (chapter on Conversation Analysis).


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures (2 hours per week) = 24 hours<br />

Fieldwork (1.5 hour per week) = 18 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

9 hours per week = 108 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

150 hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Ethnographic Observation Coursework 4 hours 6%<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Technology Study Coursework 6 hours 10%<br />

Interaction Analysis Coursework 2 hours 4%<br />

Examination Examination 2.5 hours 80% Yes<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 2.5 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Critical Study Coursework 4hours 80% Yes<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Title of Proposal(s)<br />

being considered<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Module Proposal<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Module Proposals:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Advanced Combinatorics (MTH742P)<br />

Advanced Combinatorics (MTH742U)<br />

Complex Systems (MTH743P)<br />

Complex Systems (MTH743U)<br />

Further Topics in Algebra (MTH745P)<br />

Further Topics in Algebra (MTH745U)<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />

detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />

conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />

discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />

the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

Each pair of modules include one UG <strong>and</strong> one Taught PG<br />

scheme (with different pass marks <strong>and</strong> resit schemes)<br />

Advanced Combinatorics<br />

Learning outcomes for Knowledge <strong>and</strong> Underst<strong>and</strong>ing are<br />

somewhat vague (consider replacing the word ‘some’); no<br />

transferable skills listed.<br />

Further Topics in Algebra<br />

Learning outcomes – no transferable skills identified.<br />

No reading list is provided (tbc)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />

Module Code MTH742U<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

G110 Pure Mathematics<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 5 1 50<br />

2012/13 5 1 50<br />

2013/14 10 1 50


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />

The School of Mathematics has at the moment three combinatorics-related modules at level 7: Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic<br />

Combinatorics, Extremal Combinatorics, <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics.<br />

The rationale for Advanced Combinatorics comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 combinatorics<br />

modules to two. The proposed model is to offer a general combinatorics module in Semester A, followed by an advanced<br />

combinatorics module in Semester B.<br />

The selected module for Semester A is Extremal Combinatorics. Advanced Combinatorics would follow in Semester B. Part of the<br />

syllabus of Enumerative Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics will be used in Advanced Combinatorics.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />

tutorials per week for each student.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />

Module Code MTH742U<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

MTH6109 Combinatorics<br />

None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module builds on the combinatorial ideas of the modules Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Extremal Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> introduces some<br />

of the more advanced tools for solving combinatorial <strong>and</strong> graph theoretic problems. The topics covered will depend on the<br />

module organiser's expertise but significant emphasis will be on the techniques used as well as the results proved.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This module aims to introduce students to some of the more advanced techniques used in combinatorics such as the Regularity<br />

Lemma, probabilistic techniques, the discrete Fourier transform, eigenvalue methods <strong>and</strong> generating functions with the<br />

intention that the students will be able to recognise <strong>and</strong> then apply the appropriate tools in unfamiliar situations.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

Some advanced combinatorial techniques<br />

Some of the ideas used in more advanced combinatorics<br />

A 3<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

Decide which techniques are appropriate for specific combinatorial problems<br />

Apply these techniques for solving these problems<br />

B 3<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

P. Cameron, Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic Combinatorics, Lecture notes.<br />

P. Flajolet <strong>and</strong> R. Sedgwick, Analytic Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />

Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />

Total: 44 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />

Total: 106 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

Total: 150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

David<br />

Arrowsmith<br />

Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />

DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />

email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.09 16:32:10 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />

Module Code MTH742P<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

G110 Pure Mathematics<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 5 1 50<br />

2012/13 5 1 50<br />

2013/14 10 1 50


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />

The School of Mathematics has at the moment three combinatorics-related modules at level 7: Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic<br />

Combinatorics, Extremal Combinatorics, <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics.<br />

The rationale for Advanced Combinatorics comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 combinatorics<br />

modules to two. The proposed model is to offer a general combinatorics module in Semester A, followed by an advanced<br />

combinatorics module in Semester B.<br />

The selected module for Semester A is Extremal Combinatorics. Advanced Combinatorics would follow in Semester B. Part of the<br />

syllabus of Enumerative Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics will be used in Advanced Combinatorics.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />

tutorials per week for each student.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />

Module Code MTH742P<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

MTH6109 Combinatorics None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module builds on the combinatorial ideas of the modules Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Extremal Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> introduces some<br />

of the more advanced tools for solving combinatorial <strong>and</strong> graph theoretic problems. The topics covered will depend on the<br />

module organiser's expertise but significant emphasis will be on the techniques used as well as the results proved.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

This module aims to introduce students to some of the more advanced techniques used in combinatorics such as the Regularity<br />

Lemma, probabilistic techniques, the discrete Fourier transform, eigenvalue methods <strong>and</strong> generating functions with the<br />

intention that the students will be able to recognise <strong>and</strong> then apply the appropriate tools in unfamiliar situations.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

Some advanced combinatorial techniques<br />

Some of the ideas used in more advanced combinatorics<br />

A 3<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

Decide which techniques are appropriate for specific combinatorial problems<br />

Apply these techniques for solving these problems<br />

B 3<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

P. Cameron, Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic Combinatorics, Lecture notes.<br />

P. Flajolet <strong>and</strong> R. Sedgwick, Analytic Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />

Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />

Total: 44 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />

Total: 106 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

Total: 150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

David<br />

Arrowsmith<br />

Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />

DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />

email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.09 16:29:48 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Complex Systems<br />

Module Code MTH743U<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

G120 Applied Mathematics<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 5 1 50<br />

2012/13 5 1 50<br />

2013/14 10 1 50


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Study programme: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />

The current offering of applied mathematics modules at level 7 (MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc) does not currently reflect the research strengths<br />

of the applied mathematics group in the fields of dynamical systems, stochastic processes, <strong>and</strong> their applications for the study of<br />

complex systems. At the same time, it is thought that the growing interest in complex systems, both in terms of popular interest<br />

<strong>and</strong> research, is not adequately represented at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>. The introduction of a module on complex systems is seen as an<br />

effective way to address these issues.<br />

Many mathematics departments in the UK with a strong applied group (Warwick, Bath, Bristol, etc.) already offer a module on<br />

complex systems.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />

tutorials per week for each student.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Complex Systems<br />

Module Code MTH743U<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

Complex systems can be defined as systems involving many coupled units whose collective behaviour is more than the sum of<br />

the behaviour of each unit. Examples of such systems include coupled dynamical systems, fluids, transport or biological<br />

networks, interacting particle systems, etc. The aim of this module is to introduce students with a number of mathematical tools<br />

<strong>and</strong> models used to study complex systems <strong>and</strong> to explain the mathematical meaning of key concepts of complexity science,<br />

such as self-similarity, emergence, <strong>and</strong> self-organisation. The exact topics covered will depend on the module organiser’s<br />

expertise with a view to cover practical applications using analytical <strong>and</strong> numerical tools drawn from other applied modules.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

- Introduce students to the field of complex systems via a number of representative examples <strong>and</strong> models of these systems (e.g.,<br />

coupled dynamical systems, time-delayed systems, stochastic processes, networks, time series, fractals, multifractals, particle<br />

models)<br />

- Introduce students to basic tools <strong>and</strong> quantities used in the study of complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic<br />

dynamics, dimensions, Lyapunov exponents, complexity measures, entropies)<br />

- Introduce students to the concepts of emergence <strong>and</strong> self-organisation in the context of basic models of complex models<br />

- Introduce students to basic computational <strong>and</strong> numerical methods used to study complex systems<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

Basic concepts used in the modelling of complex systems (e.g., coupled dynamical systems, maps, stochastic<br />

processes, particle models, networks, chaotic motion, fractals, multifractals, fluids)<br />

Basic tools used to study complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic coding, Lyapunov exponents,<br />

entropies, complexity measures, centrality measures)<br />

Certain phenomena associated with complex systems: e.g., chaos, ergodicity, self-similarity, scaling, emergence, selforganisation<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Construct <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> simple models of complex systems (e.g., coupled maps, coupled or delayed differential<br />

equations, particle models, networks)<br />

Use different tools to study the properties or behaviour of certain complex systems<br />

Distinguish different properties or behaviours of complex systems (e.g., regular motion, chaotic motion,<br />

synchronisation, turbulence)<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Construct short programs to numerically simulate simple models of complex systems<br />

Read technical papers on complex systems <strong>and</strong> summarise them


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

R. Badii, A. Politi, Complexity: Hierarchical Structures <strong>and</strong> Scaling in Physics, Cambridge, 1997.<br />

J. P. Sethna, Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, <strong>and</strong> Complexity, Oxford University Press, 2011.<br />

M. E. J. Newman, Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2010.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />

Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />

Total: 44 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />

Total: 106 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

Total: 150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Courseworks <strong>and</strong>/or tests Coursework N/A 20 No N/A<br />

Final examination Examination 3 hours 80 Yes<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

David<br />

Arrowsmith<br />

Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />

DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />

email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.09 16:32:41 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Complex Systems<br />

Module Code MTH743P<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

G120 Applied Mathematics<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 5 1 50<br />

2012/13 5 1 50<br />

2013/14 10 1 50


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Study programme: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />

The current offering of applied mathematics modules at level 7 (MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc) does not currently reflect the research strengths<br />

of the applied mathematics group in the fields of dynamical systems, stochastic processes, <strong>and</strong> their applications for the study of<br />

complex systems. At the same time, it is thought that the growing interest in complex systems, both in terms of popular interest<br />

<strong>and</strong> research, is not adequately represented at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>. The introduction of a module on complex systems is seen as an<br />

effective way to address these issues.<br />

Many mathematics departments in the UK with a strong applied group (Warwick, Bath, Bristol, etc.) already offer a module on<br />

complex systems.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />

tutorials per week for each student.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Complex Systems<br />

Module Code MTH743P<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

None None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

Complex systems can be defined as systems involving many coupled units whose collective behaviour is more than the sum of<br />

the behaviour of each unit. Examples of such systems include coupled dynamical systems, fluids, transport or biological<br />

networks, interacting particle systems, etc. The aim of this module is to introduce students with a number of mathematical tools<br />

<strong>and</strong> models used to study complex systems <strong>and</strong> to explain the mathematical meaning of key concepts of complexity science,<br />

such as self-similarity, emergence, <strong>and</strong> self-organisation. The exact topics covered will depend on the module organiser’s<br />

expertise with a view to cover practical applications using analytical <strong>and</strong> numerical tools drawn from other applied modules.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

- Introduce students to the field of complex systems via a number of representative examples <strong>and</strong> models of these systems (e.g.,<br />

coupled dynamical systems, time-delayed systems, stochastic processes, networks, time series, fractals, multifractals, particle<br />

models)<br />

- Introduce students to basic tools <strong>and</strong> quantities used in the study of complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic<br />

dynamics, dimensions, Lyapunov exponents, complexity measures, entropies)<br />

- Introduce students to the concepts of emergence <strong>and</strong> self-organisation in the context of basic models of complex models<br />

- Introduce students to basic computational <strong>and</strong> numerical methods used to study complex systems<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

Basic concepts used in the modelling of complex systems (e.g., coupled dynamical systems, maps, stochastic<br />

processes, particle models, networks, chaotic motion, fractals, multifractals, fluids)<br />

Basic tools used to study complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic coding, Lyapunov exponents,<br />

entropies, complexity measures, centrality measures)<br />

Certain phenomena associated with complex systems: e.g., chaos, ergodicity, self-similarity, scaling, emergence, selforganisation<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Construct <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> simple models of complex systems (e.g., coupled maps, coupled or delayed differential<br />

equations, particle models, networks)<br />

Use different tools to study the properties or behaviour of certain complex systems<br />

Distinguish different properties or behaviours of complex systems (e.g., regular motion, chaotic motion,<br />

synchronisation, turbulence)<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

Construct short programs to numerically simulate simple models of complex systems<br />

Read technical papers on complex systems <strong>and</strong> summarise them


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

R. Badii, A. Politi, Complexity: Hierarchical Structures <strong>and</strong> Scaling in Physics, Cambridge, 1997.<br />

J. P. Sethna, Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, <strong>and</strong> Complexity, Oxford University Press, 2011.<br />

M. E. J. Newman, Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2010.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />

Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />

Total: 44 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />

Total: 106 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

Total: 150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Courseworks <strong>and</strong>/or tests Coursework N/A 20 No N/A<br />

Final examination Examination 3 hours 80 Yes<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

David<br />

Arrowsmith<br />

Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />

DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />

email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.09 16:30:26 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />

Module Code MTH745U<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

G110 Pure Mathematics<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 5 1 50<br />

2012/13 5 1 50<br />

2013/14 10 1 50


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />

The School of Mathematics has at the moment three algebra modules at level 7: Group Theory, Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules, Fields <strong>and</strong><br />

Galois Theory. Of these, two are given each year.<br />

The rationale for Further Topics in Algebra comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 algebra modules<br />

to two. The proposed model is to offer a general algebra module in Semester A, followed by an advanced algebra module in<br />

Semester B.<br />

The selected module for Semester A is Group Theory. Further Topics in Algebra will follow in Semester B. Part of the syllabus of<br />

Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules <strong>and</strong> Fields <strong>and</strong> Galois Theory will be used in Further Topics depending on the module organiser.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />

tutorials per week for each student.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />

Module Code MTH745U<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

Group Theory None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module provides exposure to advanced techniques in algebra at an MSc or MSci level. Algebra encompasses familiar objects<br />

such as integers, fields, polynomial rings <strong>and</strong> matrices <strong>and</strong> has applications throughout mathematics including to geometry,<br />

number theory <strong>and</strong> topology. The module will complement the algebra module offered in Semester A <strong>and</strong> will cover topics<br />

either in commutative or noncommutative algebra. Included will be basic definitions <strong>and</strong> theorems in either case, normally with<br />

rings or fields as a starting point.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aim of this module is to expose students to advanced techniques in algebra, which complement those presented in the<br />

module Group Theory. The module is also seen as a way to prepare students to study more advanced algebra subjects at PhD<br />

level.<br />

The topics covered will depend on the expertise of the lecturer. These could be drawn from the theory of rings <strong>and</strong> their<br />

modules, Galois theory or elements of algebraic geometry. Commutative algebra or noncommutative algebra could also be<br />

covered.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

Key advanced concepts of algebra (e.g., rings, modules, finite fields, Galois theory)<br />

Key applications of algebra (e.g., insolubility of equations of degree greater than or equal to 5 by radicals, equivalence<br />

with insolubility of the Galois group)<br />

A 3<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

Apply the concepts learned to appropriate problems in advanced algebra<br />

Explain the steps of reasoning used in solving specific problems in advanced algebra<br />

B 3<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />

Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />

Total: 44 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />

Total: 106 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

Total: 150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

David<br />

Arrowsmith<br />

Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />

DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />

email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.09 16:29:14 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />

either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />

Module Code MTH745P<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code<br />

G110 Pure Mathematics<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Mathematical Sciences<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 5 1 50<br />

2012/13 5 1 50<br />

2013/14 10 1 50


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />

The School of Mathematics has at the moment three algebra modules at level 7: Group Theory, Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules, Fields <strong>and</strong><br />

Galois Theory. Of these, two are given each year.<br />

The rationale for Further Topics in Algebra comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 algebra modules<br />

to two. The proposed model is to offer a general algebra module in Semester A, followed by an advanced algebra module in<br />

Semester B.<br />

The selected module for Semester A is Group Theory. Further Topics in Algebra will follow in Semester B. Part of the syllabus of<br />

Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules <strong>and</strong> Fields <strong>and</strong> Galois Theory will be used in Further Topics depending on the module organiser.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />

tutorials per week for each student.<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />

Module Code MTH745P<br />

Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

Group Theory None None<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This module provides exposure to advanced techniques in algebra at an MSc or MSci level. Algebra encompasses familiar objects<br />

such as integers, fields, polynomial rings <strong>and</strong> matrices <strong>and</strong> has applications throughout mathematics including to geometry,<br />

number theory <strong>and</strong> topology. The module will complement the algebra module offered in Semester A <strong>and</strong> will cover topics<br />

either in commutative or noncommutative algebra. Included will be basic definitions <strong>and</strong> theorems in either case, normally with<br />

rings or fields as a starting point.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aim of this module is to expose students to advanced techniques in algebra, which complement those presented in the<br />

module Group Theory. The module is also seen as a way to prepare students to study more advanced algebra subjects at PhD<br />

level.<br />

The topics covered will depend on the expertise of the lecturer. These could be drawn from the theory of rings <strong>and</strong> their<br />

modules, Galois theory or elements of algebraic geometry. Commutative algebra or noncommutative algebra could also be<br />

covered.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

Key advanced concepts of algebra (e.g., rings, modules, finite fields, Galois theory)<br />

Key applications of algebra (e.g., insolubility of equations of degree greater than or equal to 5 by radicals, equivalence<br />

with insolubility of the Galois group)<br />

A 3<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

Apply the concepts learned to appropriate problems in advanced algebra<br />

Explain the steps of reasoning used in solving specific problems in advanced algebra<br />

B 3<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />

Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />

Total: 44 hours<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />

Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />

Total: 106 hours<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

Total: 150 hours


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Examination Examination 3 hours<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

David<br />

Arrowsmith<br />

Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />

DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />

email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.09 16:36:34 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />

<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />

is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />

specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />

please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />

Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />

Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />

30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />

module please click 'Add Half Module'.


<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-146<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />

Nature of proposal(s)<br />

Owning School /<br />

Institute<br />

Outcome requested<br />

Potential issues<br />

identified <strong>and</strong><br />

comments on the<br />

proposal(s) from<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />

Module Updates<br />

Various<br />

Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />

note the approved module updates detailed below. The<br />

following module updates detailed have been considered <strong>and</strong><br />

approved since the previous PMAB meeting on Wednesday<br />

23 rd February 2011.<br />

No significant issues identified.<br />

Module Title Module Code Responsible School / Institute<br />

Applied Futures <strong>and</strong> Options ECOM064 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Applied Risk Management ECOM059 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Further Quantitative Techniques for<br />

Finance <strong>and</strong> Economics ECOM060 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Applied Futures <strong>and</strong> Options ECOM064 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Banking <strong>and</strong> Financial Essay ECOM046 Centre for Commercial Law Studies<br />

Independent Geographical Study GEG6000 Geography<br />

Project in Environmental Science GEG6212 Geography<br />

Researching Global Change<br />

(Dissertation) GEG6301 Geography<br />

Researching Global Change<br />

(Internship) GEG6302 Geography<br />

Common Law II (Law of Tort) LAW5023 Law<br />

International Environmental Law LAW6052 Law<br />

Organisation <strong>and</strong> Identity BUS302 Business Management<br />

State, Market <strong>and</strong> Society: Concepts<br />

<strong>and</strong> Critique BUSM063 Business Management<br />

Semester Abroad – German Erasmus<br />

Work Placement GER293 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Year Abroad – Erasmus Work<br />

Placement GER297 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Culture <strong>and</strong> Society in Medieval Spain:<br />

Christians, Jews <strong>and</strong> Muslims HSP205 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

War, Humour <strong>and</strong> Love in Medieval<br />

Spanish Literature HSP306 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Russian Avant-garde RUS085 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />

Clinical Measurements DEN406 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />

Surgical Techniques <strong>and</strong> Safety DEN412 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />

Clinical Measurements DENM024 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />

Surgical Techniques <strong>and</strong> Safety MELM003 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 147<br />

Module Withdrawal Form<br />

This form should be used to obtain approval of the withdrawal of a module that has previously been approved.<br />

Please note that modules cannot be registered as withdrawn on the Student Information System until resitting/<br />

retaking students have completed the appropriate assessment.<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information<br />

Module Title Please see attached lists DCD <strong>and</strong> DCH/ELH modules<br />

Module Code<br />

Credit Value 15<br />

Level Mode of Study Distance Learning<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Schools also involved in teaching part of the module<br />

If the module is to be replaced, please give the title <strong>and</strong> (if available) code of the new module.<br />

Proposed date of last intake (insert month/year) Last cohort has already completed<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Jane Reid<br />

1) Rationale for Proposed Withdrawal<br />

The DCD modules were all part of a distance learning programme (G5BT BSc (Hons) Computer Science) which has ceased to run<br />

<strong>and</strong> will be withdrawn in due course.<br />

The DCH - ELH modules were all part of a distance learning programme (G5HK BSc (Hons) Computer Science) which has ceased<br />

to run <strong>and</strong> will be withdrawn in due course.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 147<br />

2) Implications of the Proposed Withdrawal<br />

Specify how students' programme of study might be affected <strong>and</strong> indicate whether the students have been<br />

consulted on the proposed change. If the External Examiners have been consulted please insert comments<br />

here.<br />

No implications<br />

Implications of the Proposed Withdrawal<br />

Please list those programmes of study<br />

for which this module is either<br />

compulsory or recommended.<br />

Have the relevant programme<br />

organisers agreed in principle to the<br />

withdrawal?<br />

Please see attached list<br />

Yes<br />

Is the module taken by students from<br />

other Schools? If so please list the<br />

Schools <strong>and</strong> confirm that they have<br />

been informed of the proposed module<br />

withdrawal.<br />

No<br />

What steps are being taken to avoid<br />

any shortfall in academic provision?<br />

N/A<br />

Approval of Module Withdrawal<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Module Withdrawals ref BSc in Computer Science (G5BT)<br />

DCD100<br />

DCD103<br />

DCD104<br />

DCD111<br />

DCD113<br />

DCD124<br />

DCD129<br />

DCD150<br />

DCD200<br />

DCD201<br />

DCD210<br />

DCD219<br />

DCD224<br />

DCD225<br />

DCD234<br />

DCD235<br />

DCD237<br />

DCD301<br />

DCD302<br />

DCD303<br />

DCD306<br />

DCD310<br />

DCD314<br />

DCD317<br />

DCD318<br />

DCD326<br />

DCD327<br />

DCD333<br />

DCD334<br />

DCD337<br />

DCD338<br />

DCD340<br />

DCD341<br />

Procedural Programming<br />

Language And Communication<br />

Object-Oriented Programming<br />

Computer Architecture<br />

Logic And Discrete Structures<br />

Computers And Society<br />

Probability And Matrices<br />

Fundamentals Of Web Technology<br />

Essential Networks And Operating Systems<br />

Further Networks And Operating Systems<br />

Algorithms And Data Structures In An<br />

Object-Oriented Framework<br />

Specification And Reasoning<br />

Graphical User Interfaces<br />

Database Systems<br />

Software Engineering Theory<br />

Software Engineering<br />

Business Information Systems<br />

Computability<br />

Multimedia<br />

Computational Genomics<br />

High Performance Computing<br />

Systems Analysis<br />

Computer Graphics<br />

Advanced Database Systems And Technology<br />

Interaction Design<br />

Artificial Intelligence<br />

Machine Learning Techniques For Data<br />

Mining<br />

Algorithms And Complexity<br />

Computer Science Project<br />

Software Risk Assessment<br />

Distributed Systems And Security<br />

C++ For Image <strong>and</strong> Audio Processing<br />

Entrepreneurship In Information Technology


School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />

Module Withdrawals ref BSc in Computer Science (G5HK)<br />

ELH402<br />

ELH606<br />

Enterprise Management<br />

Product Development<br />

DCH100<br />

DCH103<br />

DCH104<br />

DCH111<br />

DCH113<br />

DCH124<br />

DCH129<br />

DCH150<br />

DCH200<br />

DCH201<br />

DCH210<br />

DCH219<br />

DCH224<br />

DCH225<br />

DCH234<br />

DCH235<br />

DCH301<br />

DCH302<br />

DCH303<br />

DCH306<br />

DCH310<br />

DCH314<br />

DCH317<br />

DCH318<br />

DCH326<br />

DCH327<br />

DCH330<br />

DCH333<br />

DCH334<br />

DCH337<br />

DCH338<br />

DCH339<br />

DCH341<br />

Procedural Programming<br />

Language And Communication<br />

Object-Oriented Programming<br />

Computer Architecture<br />

Logic And Discrete Structures<br />

Computers And Society<br />

Probability And Matrices<br />

Fundamentals Of Web Technology<br />

Essential Networks And Operating Systems<br />

Further Networks And Operating Systems<br />

Algorithms And Data Structures In An<br />

Object-Oriented Framework<br />

Specification And Reasoning<br />

Graphical User Interfaces<br />

Database Systems<br />

Software Engineering Theory<br />

Software Engineering<br />

Computability<br />

Multimedia<br />

Computational Genomics<br />

High Performance Computing<br />

Systems Analysis<br />

Computer Graphics<br />

Advanced Database Systems And Technology<br />

Interaction Design<br />

Artificial Intelligence<br />

Machine Learning Techniques For Data<br />

Mining<br />

Management Of Technology<br />

Algorithms And Complexity<br />

Computer Science Project<br />

Software Risk Assessment<br />

Distributed Systems And Security<br />

C++ For Image Processing<br />

Entrepreneurship In Information Technology


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />

Programme Amendment Form<br />

This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />

the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />

• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />

necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />

• change in the length of the programme of study<br />

• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />

• changes in the programme regulations<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />

Programme Title(s) Dental Materials<br />

Programme Code(s) J5S9<br />

Programme Qualification<br />

Master of Science (MSc)<br />

Mode of study<br />

Programme<br />

Duration<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

School of Engineering & Materials Science<br />

Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />

School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry (Institute of Dentistry)<br />

Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />

Not applicable<br />

Programme Organiser Professor R Hill <strong>and</strong> Dr AJ Bushby<br />

1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />

modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />

specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />

programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />

in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />

This proposed programme amendment will involve the development of a joint programme managed between SEMS <strong>and</strong> SMD<br />

(Institute of Dentistry) built upon the use of current modules to offer improved coherence <strong>and</strong> logic. The following modules from<br />

the current MSc in Dental Materials curriculum will be withdrawn:<br />

Materials Chemistry (MTRM010), Applied Dental Materials (MTRM028), Advanced topics in Dental Materials (MTRM049),<br />

Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Modelling in Dental Materials (MAT316), Biosensors <strong>and</strong> devices (MTRM007), Advanced structure/property<br />

relationships in materials (MTRM065).<br />

These will be replaced by the following modules, taken primarily from Institute of Dentistry programmes:


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />

Properties of Dental Materials 1 & 2 (DIN7008/DIN7009), Minimally Invasive Dentistry (DIN7152), Biomineralisation <strong>and</strong><br />

Biomimetics (DIN7154), Medical Ethics & Regulatory Practice (DENM009), Research Methods & Experimental Techniques<br />

(DENM014) <strong>and</strong> Oral Biology 1 (a new module to be created from a current 30 credit module, DIN7150).<br />

The MSc exam board will be based in SEMS, embedded in the existing SEMS SEB structure, with appropriate representation from<br />

the Institute of Dentistry.<br />

Admissions for the joint programme will be administered by SEMS, with recruitment decisions taken jointly by the programme<br />

organisers. The admissions target will be 12 full-time students each year, subject to annual review between SEMS/SMD (Institute<br />

of Dentistry). A costing statement is attached, confirming that fee income from the programme will be distributed equally<br />

between SEMS/SMD (Institute of Dentistry).<br />

Either SEMS or SMD (Institute of Dentistry) may withdraw from this arrangement, subject to giving 12 months notice of that<br />

withdrawal.<br />

The revised programme structure is detailed below:<br />

Module Title<br />

Module<br />

Code<br />

Credits<br />

Level<br />

Module<br />

Selection<br />

Status<br />

<strong>Academic</strong><br />

Year of<br />

Study<br />

Add / Remove<br />

Module from<br />

Programme<br />

X Properties of Dental Materials 1 DIN 7008 15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />

X Properties of Dental Materials 2 DIN 7009 15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />

X Introduction to Oral Biology 1 to be assigne 15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />

X Minimally Invasive Dentistry DIN7152 15 7 Elective 1 Add Module<br />

X Biomineralisation & biomimetics DIN7158 15 7 Elective 1 Add Module<br />

X<br />

Research Methods/Experimental<br />

Techniques<br />

DENM014<br />

15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />

X Surfaces & interfaces in Dentistry MAT211 15 5 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />

X<br />

Medical Ethics/Law/Regulatory<br />

Practice<br />

DENM009<br />

15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />

X Science of Biocompatability MAT312 15 5 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />

X Research Project MTRM005/DI 60 7 Core 1 Add Module<br />

2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />

Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />

Not applicable<br />

3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />

4) Rationale<br />

Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />

This programme amendment is designed to clarify, re-focus <strong>and</strong> enhance the current taught postgraduate portfolio offered<br />

respectively by SEMS/Institute of Dentistry. There are currently parallel <strong>and</strong> competing programmes offered within SEMS <strong>and</strong><br />

SMD (Dental Materials & Dental Technology) - this amendment will create a joint collaborative programme designed to recruit<br />

high quality applicants. It will aim to offer an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the basic science underlying dental materials, offering<br />

opportunities for those seeking to develop research careers in dental materials at the academic/clinical interface. The<br />

anticipated recruitment market will be primarily dental school academics <strong>and</strong> basic scientists seeking specialist training in dental<br />

materials research. The programme is designed to provide a suitable entry training for PhD programmes in Materials <strong>and</strong> Dental<br />

Materials.<br />

The amendment will also allow QMUL to respond positively to current programme developments in other UK higher education<br />

institutions (Sheffield, Manchester). Students have requested the creation of this opportunity. The essentially clinical <strong>and</strong><br />

technique based MSc in Dental Technology programme will be retained in SMD which recruits from a different market.<br />

5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />

Attendance at joint modules attracting students from various programmes will require appropriately sized <strong>and</strong> equipped<br />

teaching accommodation to be made available.<br />

6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />

Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />

proposed amendment(s)?<br />

No negative impact on students' study patterns is anticipated - the creation of the joint programme is expected to create a more<br />

seamless curriculum which will encourage student study. One driver for the programme amendment is student feedback, see<br />

below, requesting the opportunity of exploring the clinical interface in the academic content of the current programme.<br />

It is recognised that the organisation of modules in the Institute of Dentistry will require one examination to be held in week 7/8<br />

of Semester B, for module DIN7008, along with other students studying this module. It is believed that this is valuable, in<br />

particular for overseas students to gauge their academic performance; informal feedback to the students can be provided by<br />

tutors for those who are performing below the required level required for successful completion of their MSc.<br />

7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />

Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />

please detail their comments.<br />

Letter of support attached from the current External Examiner: Serena Best<br />

Student statements attached.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />

A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />

Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />

considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />

> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />

modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />

Yes<br />

> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />

amendment?<br />

Yes<br />

Approval of Programme Amendment<br />

Programme<br />

Organiser*<br />

Julia<br />

Shelton<br />

Digitally signed by Julia Shelton<br />

DN: cn=Julia Shelton, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong><br />

University of London, ou=School of<br />

Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science,<br />

email=j.shelton@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.15 14:57:07 Z<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Farida<br />

Fortune<br />

Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />

DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />

ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />

email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />

c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.10 10:13:20 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

John Stark<br />

Digitally signed by John Stark<br />

DN: cn=John Stark, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />

ou=School of Engineering <strong>and</strong><br />

Materials Science,<br />

email=j.p.w.stark@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.15 08:57:30 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board


Prof. Serena M. Best BSc, MA (Cantab), PhD, FIi\1MM, CEng<br />

Professor ofMaterials Science<br />

Director ofthe Cambridge Centre f or Medical Materials<br />

Professor Julia Shelton<br />

<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>, University of London<br />

UNIVERSITY OF<br />

CAMBRIDGE<br />

Department of Ma terials<br />

Science <strong>and</strong> Metallurgy<br />

1 February 2011<br />

Dear Professor Shelton,<br />

MSc in Dental Materials Programme Amendment<br />

I have been the external examiner for the Dental Materials MSc programme at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> for 3<br />

years <strong>and</strong> whilst I have been completely satisfied by its academic content <strong>and</strong> the project dissertations,<br />

I am most interested in the programme amendment that is being suggested.<br />

The amendments that are proposed to include the delivery of modules by the Institute of Dentistry<br />

seem entirely appropriate <strong>and</strong> the inclusion of projects that are co-supervised by SEMS <strong>and</strong> Institute<br />

of Dentistry academics will enhance the programme considerably.<br />

1 am fully supportive of these amendments <strong>and</strong> believe that they will enhance the programme<br />

considerably.<br />

Yours sincerely,<br />

Professor Serena Best<br />

New Museums Site<br />

Pembroke Street<br />

Cambridge CB2 3QZ<br />

Telephone: 01223 334307<br />

Fax: 01223334567<br />

E-mail: smb51@cam.ac.uk


Student comment: MSc in Dental Materials<br />

1. Soon after completing my BDS from Pakistan, I came to <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of<br />

London to study MS-c- in Dental Material. The course greatly helped me develop my<br />

knowledge in materials science in general <strong>and</strong> dental materials in specific. I<br />

completed the degree with distinction <strong>and</strong> was offered a PhD scholarship. Having<br />

completed my PhD, am now working as a Post-Doc on a KTP project with pSp<br />

Dental, UK. The project aims at developing a novel range of resin modified glass<br />

ionomer cement.<br />

2. I am an overseas Dentist. I joined <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of London for my M.Sc. in<br />

Dental Materials in 2004 due to its reputation as a leading institute for Material Sciences within<br />

the University of London. Studying Dental Materials in QMUL has given -. the opportunity to<br />

explore dental materials from a number of different perspectives. The course was being run in<br />

collaboration with Institute of Dentistry which also provided me a great learning<br />

environment. I have found the course very enjoyable <strong>and</strong> most of the modules were very<br />

relevant to my course. However, some modules such as Biosensor <strong>and</strong> Devices <strong>and</strong> Materials<br />

Selection <strong>and</strong> Design were not designed according to dentistry. Due to lack of equipment in<br />

QMUL laboratories such as Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy<br />

(ICP-OES), I had to attend another university outside of London for my experiments. The<br />

lecturers <strong>and</strong> other staff were very helpful. They were always ready to listen to students’<br />

problems <strong>and</strong> advise adequately.<br />

3. I did my MSc in Dental Materials from <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of London in 2006/07. I am<br />

a dentist <strong>and</strong> opted to do this course so that l could have a better knowledge in<br />

advancements in dental materials. After completing the course I felt that the whole course<br />

was too much generalized in giving information about how research is conducted, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

properties of materials, from a materials point of view. The thing that was most lacking was<br />

the clinical perspective of the materials i.e. how the properties were affected in clinical<br />

situations or in oral environment <strong>and</strong> vice versa. The course also lacked knowledge about<br />

where the current research of the dental materials is heading, what would be the hot field<br />

to research in the future <strong>and</strong> what to expect in future in terms of materials that would be<br />

available in market. The reason for this insufficiency of the course could be attributed to<br />

the lack of collaboration with the institute of dentistry because all the modules especially<br />

the dental materials were taught by engineering <strong>and</strong> materials staff who lacked the clinical<br />

background/knowledge. Restructuring the course so that dentistry link is re-established<br />

would be a huge improvement for the people who take this course in future.<br />

Overall it was a great experience for me <strong>and</strong> I found the course enjoyable <strong>and</strong> challenging.<br />

The whole university environment <strong>and</strong> the facilities provided by department made up for<br />

the points that I believed were lacking in the course.<br />

4. Attending the MSc Dental Materials course (2A06/07) was an intense, interesting <strong>and</strong><br />

scientifically stimulating experience. The taught modules spread over a wide range of<br />

Biomaterials topics <strong>and</strong> focused on many aspects of current hi-end Biomaterials <strong>and</strong> stem-cell<br />

research. The course was generally well organised with many problem-based-learning<br />

exercises <strong>and</strong> team projects throughout the year. The course co-ordinators <strong>and</strong> teachers were<br />

all keen <strong>and</strong> experienced in teaching. There was however a noticeable lack of staff with Dental<br />

background as most of the teaching staff were material scientists <strong>and</strong> chemists. This made the<br />

course's target vague <strong>and</strong> often caused disorientation amongst the students. Although very<br />

interesting <strong>and</strong> very mind -broadening in terms of curriculum, the programme may have


enefited from more dental materials related courses taught by experts in the field. This could<br />

have been accomplished if a collaboration between the Dental School <strong>and</strong> the School of<br />

Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science had been established. As students had both dental <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

technical background, the exercises should have been designed in a way so as to enhance<br />

relevant skills <strong>and</strong> knowledge. ln contrast, many exercises involved working with undergraduate<br />

students from many other disciplines in various material related issues but not dental related. lf<br />

the exercises were more related to dental research, this contact with undergraduates would<br />

have been of true benefit for us. The students expressed their thoughts for improvements<br />

through many SSLC meetings; however no improvements seemed to be possible at the time.<br />

The research project however gave the opportunity to most of the students to redefine their<br />

target as luckily many supervisors from the Dental Physical Sciences unit <strong>and</strong> the Dental School<br />

were chosen.<br />

To conclude, redesigning the course to include more dental related material specific topics<br />

would be of great benefit to future students. Collaboration with the Dental School for the<br />

teaching of the core Dental Materials subjects <strong>and</strong> relevant research could make this possible.<br />

Since the School of Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science is well equipped in terms of materials<br />

research equipment, the link with the Dental school would certainly satisfy the research interests<br />

<strong>and</strong> needs of prospective dental materials students.<br />

*****


COSTING MODEL FOR POSTGRADUATE TAUGHT COURSES<br />

INCOME & EXPENDITURE FORECAST<br />

COURSE TITLE:<br />

MSc Dental Materials<br />

Planned student numbers<br />

Year 1<br />

2011-12<br />

Full-time home / low fee - paying 2.0<br />

Part-time home / low fee - paying 0.0<br />

Full-time overseas / premium fee - paying 10.0<br />

Part-time overseas / premium fee - paying 0.0<br />

Total student numbers 12.0<br />

Total student fte 12.0<br />

Fee rates<br />

Full-time home / low fee £9,500<br />

Part-time home / low fee £4,750<br />

Full-time overseas / premium fee £15,750<br />

Part-time overseas / premium fee £7,875<br />

Forecast tuition fee income<br />

Home / low fee-paying students £19,000<br />

Overseas/ premium fee - paying students £157,500<br />

Less discounts £0


Less cash discount on overseas fees @ 2% (£3,150)<br />

Total forecast tuition fee income £173,350<br />

Other income £0<br />

Total income £173,350<br />

Income Dentistry £86,675<br />

Income SEMS £86,675<br />

Projected costs<br />

Year 1<br />

2011-12<br />

Staff costs<br />

Annual cost per fte<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> staff:<br />

Course director (Clinical) £112,750 £0<br />

Course director (Non-clinical) £82,000 £0<br />

Clinical professors £123,000 £0<br />

Other clinical academics £102,500 £0<br />

Non-clinical professors £92,250 £92,250<br />

Reader / senior lecturers £71,750 £0<br />

Lecturers £51,250 £42,025 Assume .82 FTE here<br />

Support staff £46,125 £0<br />

Other 'bought in' staff costs £0<br />

Total staff costs £0 £134,275<br />

Non-staff costs<br />

Course materials £3,000


Laboratory consumables<br />

£9,600 Allowing £800 per student<br />

Office consumables £0<br />

Equipment £0<br />

External examiners' fees & expenses<br />

£360 External Examiner<br />

Outside speakers £0<br />

Staff advertising £0<br />

Publicity & marketing £0<br />

Hospitality £0<br />

Miscellaneous expenses £0<br />

Provision for bad debts @ 5% £8,668<br />

Other:<br />

Total non-staff costs £21,628<br />

Overhead<br />

Per home student fte £1,166 £2,332<br />

Per overseas student fte £1,388 £13,880<br />

Per academic staff fte £9,387 £17,084.34<br />

Per other staff fte £1,840<br />

Per £1k non-pay expenditure £71 £915.90<br />

Per sq.m. space (exc investment charge)<br />

Per sq.m. space (inc investment charge)<br />

Total Overhead Charge £34,212<br />

Total Costs £190,115


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />

Module Proposal Form<br />

Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />

Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />

alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />

or as a half module (section 4)<br />

By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />

Section 1 - Summary Information<br />

Module Title Financial Models <strong>and</strong> Derivatives in a Legal Context<br />

Module Code QLLM125<br />

Credit Value 45 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />

Start Date September 2011<br />

Proposed JACS Code 1<br />

Proposed JACS Code 2<br />

M221 Business <strong>and</strong> Commercial Law<br />

M900 Others in Law<br />

Proposed JACS Code 3<br />

Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />

Responsible School / Institute<br />

Centre for Commercial Law Studies<br />

Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />

Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />

percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />

Subject Exam Board<br />

responsible for the module<br />

LLM & PG Diploma, MSC Law <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />

Anticipated Student Registrations<br />

Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />

2011/12 40 5 none<br />

2011/12


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />

Module Rationale<br />

Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />

is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />

The rationale of this course is to introduce law students to basic concepts <strong>and</strong> models in finance <strong>and</strong> their implementation in<br />

asset valuation. These concepts <strong>and</strong> models, including sophisticated derivative instruments, are being increasingly used by the<br />

courts. The course aims to simplify complex financial concepts in order to facilitate legal implementation. Students seeking to be<br />

involved in complex commercial <strong>and</strong> financial transactions need to develop underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> facility in dealing with these<br />

models <strong>and</strong> this module meets these needs. Students interested in research can accommodate to a different area of future legal<br />

research in commercial law. This course broadens the scope of the legal analysis taught in the commercial law department <strong>and</strong><br />

complements courses taught currently in the commercial law <strong>and</strong> international financial law departments.<br />

The module will be offered as an optional module in the LLM, General PG Diploma <strong>and</strong> MSC in Law <strong>and</strong> Finance programme.<br />

Resource Requirements<br />

By school responsible for module<br />

CCLS, School of Law<br />

By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />

collaborative institution<br />

School of Economics<br />

Section 2 - Module Specification<br />

Module Title Financial Models <strong>and</strong> Derivatives in a Legal Context<br />

Module Code QLLM125<br />

Credit Value 45 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />

Module Organiser<br />

Dr. Dorit Samuel<br />

Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />

none<br />

1) Content Description<br />

Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />

System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />

This course introduces complex concepts in finance at a level that is appropriate for law students to master them . The first part of<br />

the course introduces the student to basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of financial models <strong>and</strong> concepts as it relates to valuation in a legal<br />

context. This knowledge forms the basis of analysis for the more complex <strong>and</strong> broader concept of derivatives. The focus<br />

eventually turns to the analysis of “derivative” instruments, their application in different economic situations, <strong>and</strong> the benefits/<br />

consequences of helping clients set up contracts employing them when investing or conducting business, both locally <strong>and</strong><br />

globally. Derivative instruments will be analyzed from two separate points of view: speculative <strong>and</strong> hedging. Tools <strong>and</strong> basic<br />

models that help in underst<strong>and</strong>ing the appropriate usage of different derivatives in different situations will also be introduced<br />

<strong>and</strong> examined. Through the course analysis, students will develop a thorough underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the models that influence <strong>and</strong><br />

eventually determine the relationships among different derivative instruments. Legal cases are used to analyze actual situations<br />

<strong>and</strong> explore different possible solutions using financial models <strong>and</strong> derivatives, facilitating an acceptable legal determination as<br />

to the best selection for every particular exposure. The course will be taught on the assumption that the students have no prior<br />

knowledge of these financial instruments.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />

2) Module Aims<br />

Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />

The aim of the module is to empower the student to evaluate the legal contractual binding systems supporting the financial<br />

models in general, with a focus on derivatives. From the course, the students should develop proficiency in the manipulation of<br />

financial data <strong>and</strong> financial information systems usage; they should become competent to engage in basic financial analysis<br />

followed by application of those financial models to support legal analysis <strong>and</strong> decision. The course will work extensively with<br />

Excel spreadsheet, although proficiency in excel is not required <strong>and</strong> instructions will be afforded in its use, students should be<br />

prepared to learn to use it. The course culminates in a thorough analysis, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> application of derivatives. Legal<br />

cases will be used to evaluate, criticize <strong>and</strong> support underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the difficulties of the courts in dealing with valuation<br />

conflicts arising from the application of these financial models.<br />

3) Learning Outcomes<br />

Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />

completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />

Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />

Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />

Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />

A 1<br />

A 2<br />

A 3<br />

Excel spreadsheet in the analysis <strong>and</strong> manipulation of financial data <strong>and</strong> the ability to retrieve financial information<br />

from data bases as needed .<br />

Financial models <strong>and</strong> concepts used by the courts <strong>and</strong> the conflicts that arise from applying them.<br />

Derivatives <strong>and</strong> the models that support their application, <strong>and</strong> future legal implication of using them speculatively.<br />

Intellectual skills - able to:<br />

B 1<br />

B 2<br />

B 3<br />

Produce a critical evaluation of the models used by the courts <strong>and</strong> assess their respective strength <strong>and</strong> potential<br />

shortcomings in their application.<br />

Apply new concepts that would clarify the limitations of the models when used in new applications.<br />

Improve their technical ability to analyze complex financial data.<br />

Transferable skills - able to:<br />

C 1<br />

C 2<br />

C 3<br />

Make financial decisions <strong>and</strong> adapt legal positions to reflect changed conditions.<br />

Evaluate complex expert financial opinions in courts.<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>, adapt, <strong>and</strong> use current research in financial analysis.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />

Practical skills - able to:<br />

D 1<br />

D 2<br />

D 3<br />

Deal with complex financial issues, <strong>and</strong> make sound judgements when adapting to changes or incomplete<br />

information<br />

Adapt quickly to permutations in the financial concepts<br />

Pursue new venues of financial valuation within the context of available legal constrictions<br />

4) Reading List<br />

Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />

be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />

Weekly lecture notes provided by Dr. Samuel.<br />

"Harvard Business Review" articles <strong>and</strong> cases.<br />

Current legal cases.


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />

Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />

Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />

achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />

of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />

1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />

Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />

lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />

enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />

<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />

weekly: seminars/lectures (2 hours) = 44<br />

2. Student independent learning time<br />

Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />

of study a student undertaking this module would<br />

be expected to undertake.<br />

weekly: computer lab assignments (5.5 hours), reading <strong>and</strong> research<br />

(7 hours), homework (6 hours) =406<br />

1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />

Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />

should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />

The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />

point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />

represents 150 notional study hours.<br />

45 hours = 450 notional study hours<br />

Assessment Profile<br />

Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />

Brief Description of<br />

Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration /<br />

Length of<br />

Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

Percentage<br />

Weighting<br />

Qualifying<br />

Final element Mark for<br />

of assessment? Individual<br />

Assessment<br />

course essay Coursework 7500 words 50% Yes N/A<br />

course essay Coursework 7500 words 50% Yes N/A<br />

Reassessment<br />

Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />

Synoptic Reassessment<br />

Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)


Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />

Brief Description of Assessment<br />

Assessment Type<br />

Duration / Length of Examination /<br />

Coursework<br />

2 x course essays Coursework 2 x 7500 word essays<br />

Approval of New Module Proposal<br />

The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />

can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />

computing resources).<br />

Head(s) of School<br />

Spyros<br />

Manitias<br />

Digitally signed by Spyros Manitias<br />

DN: cn=Spyros Manitias, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />

<strong>Mary</strong>, UoL, ou=Centre for Commercial<br />

Law Studies,<br />

email=s.m.manitias@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />

Date: 2011.03.16 15:29:59 Z<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Head(s) of<br />

supporting School<br />

Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />

Approval Board<br />

Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />

includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />

therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />

above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />

Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />

This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />

available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />

taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />

please click 'Add Half Module'.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!