Paper - Academic Registry and Council Secretariat - Queen Mary ...
Paper - Academic Registry and Council Secretariat - Queen Mary ...
Paper - Academic Registry and Council Secretariat - Queen Mary ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board<br />
Minutes of the meeting of the Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board held on<br />
Wednesday 23 February 2011 at 13.00<br />
UNCONFIRMED<br />
Present:<br />
Prof. Susan Dilly (Chair)<br />
Peter Rosenberg Dr. Mark Carroll Dr. Henri Huijberts<br />
Prof. Olwyn Westwood Vraj Domalip Prof. Warren Boutcher<br />
Dr. Andy Robinson Prof. Omar Garcia-Obregon Prof. Peter McOwan<br />
Prof. Ray Croucher<br />
Prof. Elizabeth Davenport<br />
In attendance:<br />
Ken Chow (Secretary) Jane Pallant Dr. Roger Nix<br />
Prof. Joy Hinson (on behalf of Dr. Ali Zarbakhsh<br />
Prof. F Breedon<br />
Prof. Anthony Warrens)<br />
Raluca Vasiliu-McIver Prof. Peter Heathcote Dr. Chris Reid<br />
Dr. Alastair Owens Prof. Ray Kiely Eugene Doyen<br />
Maria Espas<strong>and</strong>in Dr. Michael Seed Dr. Leon Vinokur<br />
Simon Pate<br />
Apologies:<br />
Prof. Anthony Warrens Dr. Julia Shelton Angie Raymond<br />
Dr. Sam Brenton Prof. Andrew Le Sueur Dr.Theo Kreouzis<br />
Dr. Stuart Perrin<br />
Part 1 – Preliminary Items<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
2. Minutes of the previous meeting PMAB2010-048<br />
2010:042 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> confirmed the minutes of the<br />
previous meeting held on Wednesday 24 th November 2010.<br />
3. Matters Arising from the previous meeting PMAB2010-049<br />
2010:043 The Board received a paper on the matters arising from the minutes of the previous<br />
meetings of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board. The Board noted that there<br />
were a number of outst<strong>and</strong>ing actions still to be addressed both from the October<br />
<strong>and</strong> November PMAB meetings.<br />
Action: CCLS / EECS<br />
Part 2 – For Information<br />
<strong>Paper</strong>
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
4. External LLM 2011 Regulations (Chair’s Action) n/a<br />
2010:044 The Board noted that a number of minor amendments to the External LLM<br />
Regulations had been approved by Chair’s Action outside of the meeting.<br />
5. Brief report on the Articulation Agreement Sub-Board<br />
meeting held on 13 October 2010<br />
PMAB2010-050<br />
2010:045 The Board noted a report from the Articulation Agreement Sub-Board.<br />
6. MSc Finance (Part 1) Chair’s Action n/a<br />
2010:046 The Board received confirmation that a Part 1 Programme Proposal for the MSc<br />
Finance had been approved by Chair’s Action <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The MSc Finance proposal had been considered outside of the normal<br />
timescale: the School had been keen to offer the MSc in Finance for some<br />
time <strong>and</strong> was now in a position to do so. The consideration of the Part 1 in<br />
advance of the meeting allowed for proper scrutiny without unduly delaying<br />
the advertising of this new programme.’<br />
ii. The Part 1 Proposal had been circulated to Board members for comments<br />
<strong>and</strong> these had been addressed in the version presented to the Board.<br />
Part 3 – Programme Proposals (H&SS)<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
Faculty of Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences<br />
7. School of Business Management<br />
MSc International Business <strong>and</strong> Politics (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 3 associated<br />
module proposals:<br />
PMAB2010-052<br />
The Politics of International Business<br />
Political Economy: Theory <strong>and</strong> History<br />
MSc International Business <strong>and</strong> Politics Dissertation<br />
2010:047 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated module<br />
proposals for the MSc International Business <strong>and</strong> Politics <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The proposed programme used expertise within the School of Politics <strong>and</strong><br />
International Relations <strong>and</strong> School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />
ii. There was a clear student dem<strong>and</strong> for the programme, particularly<br />
internationally.<br />
iii. The School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management supported the proposal.<br />
iv. The module ‘The Americas in Comparative Perspective 1: Historical Roots’<br />
would now not be offered as an elective module on the programme. This<br />
change would necessitate a revision to the Part 2 Form <strong>and</strong> Programme<br />
Specification so that the module was removed.
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
v. Given that two Schools would be involved in the delivery of the programme,<br />
the Board questioned how the programme would be managed <strong>and</strong> sought<br />
further details regarding the specified 'co-convenorship model’ to be used.<br />
vi. As the leading school, the School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management would take<br />
ultimately responsibility for the management <strong>and</strong> quality assurance of the<br />
programme.<br />
vii. Both schools were in the process of agreeing a formal administration model<br />
for the programme, which would detail the responsibilities of each school.<br />
The Board commended this as an exemplar of good practice.<br />
viii. The Board suggested that the final agreed administration model could be<br />
disseminated to other colleagues who were involved in jointly delivered<br />
programmes.<br />
ix. The funding for the dissertation module was discussed, as there were some<br />
concerns with regards to how funding would be administered. Following<br />
clarification, it was confirmed that funding would be split equally between the<br />
two schools.<br />
x. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />
module proposals subject to the clarification of the points detailed above <strong>and</strong><br />
the submission of a revised Part 2 Programme Proposal form. The revised<br />
documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />
Action: SBM / Chair<br />
8. School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
MSc Finance (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module proposal<br />
(Investments)<br />
PMAB2010-053<br />
2010:048 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> an associated module<br />
proposal for the MSc Finance <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The MSc Finance would only be offered on a full-time basis.<br />
ii. There was dem<strong>and</strong> from students who wanted to study a pure finance MSc.<br />
iii. The comments provided by the external advisor were not sufficiently detailed<br />
<strong>and</strong> required revision. A detailed appraisal of the proposal by an external<br />
advisor should be carried out using information obtained in the External<br />
Advisor Guidelines.<br />
iv. The programme’s learning outcomes needed to be revisited, as some did<br />
not correspond with the suggested headings of knowledge <strong>and</strong><br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing, intellectual skills, transferable skills, <strong>and</strong> practical skills.<br />
v. According to the programme structure five modules were listed as core<br />
modules but following discussion it was suggested that they should be listed<br />
as compulsory with the dissertation listed as a core module. The designation<br />
of module status would comply with the practice adopted elsewhere within<br />
the School.<br />
vi. The learning outcomes for the Investments module required further work<br />
<strong>and</strong> more detail in order to fully reflect that the module was at level 7.<br />
Specifically, a number of outcomes, such as ‘to work in teams’ <strong>and</strong> ‘to work
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
to deadlines’ were deemed not sufficiently detailed by Board members.<br />
vii. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />
module proposal subject to the clarification of the points detailed above <strong>and</strong><br />
the submission of a revised Part 2 Programme Proposal form <strong>and</strong> revised<br />
Module Proposal form. The revised documentation would be considered<br />
outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />
Action: SEF<br />
9. School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />
MA English Studies (Part 1)<br />
PMAB2010-054<br />
2010:049 The Board considered a Part 1 programme proposal for the MA English Studies<br />
<strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The proposed programme would restructure the existing MA provision in<br />
English, <strong>and</strong> create opportunities to develop teaching in areas that were<br />
currently under represented in the postgraduate taught curriculum.<br />
ii. The aim of the MA English Studies was to enhance student learning by<br />
increasing module choice <strong>and</strong> to improve the student experience by making<br />
the academic management of the MA more effective.<br />
iii. The MA English Studies would function as an umbrella programme with a<br />
single point of entry but with several distinct pathways.<br />
iv. Further information would be needed with regard to the precise programme<br />
<strong>and</strong> pathway structures. It was agreed that this issue would be discussed<br />
outside of the meeting.<br />
Action: CR / AR<br />
v. The programme had the full endorsement of the Dean for Taught<br />
Programmes (Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences) <strong>and</strong> had successfully been<br />
approved through the Planning <strong>and</strong> Accountability Review process.<br />
vi. The Board approved the Part 1 programme proposal.<br />
10. School of Geography<br />
MSci Environmental Science (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 2 associated module<br />
proposals:<br />
PMAB2010-055<br />
Advanced Research <strong>and</strong> Practice in Environmental Science<br />
Independent Research Project<br />
2010:050 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated module<br />
proposals for the MSci Environmental Science <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. There was evidence of dem<strong>and</strong> from overseas students for the proposed<br />
programme.<br />
ii. Student performance would dictate progression onto the MSci.<br />
iii. Students who did not want to pursue the MSci award would potentially have<br />
the option to achieve a classified degree so long as they met the credit
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
requirements for the st<strong>and</strong>ard BSc degree.<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
iv. Undergraduate versions of the specified postgraduate modules had been<br />
created for the programme <strong>and</strong> would be utilised due to the differing pass<br />
marks for undergraduate (40%) <strong>and</strong> postgraduate modules (50%).<br />
v. The proposal was in line with current practice <strong>and</strong> other MSci programmes<br />
that operated within <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>.<br />
vi. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />
module proposals.<br />
11. School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
i. MA Documentary Practice (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module<br />
proposal (Documentary Production Project)<br />
PMAB2010-056<br />
2010:051 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module<br />
proposal for the MA Documentary Practice <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The necessary resources <strong>and</strong> facilities were available to support the<br />
programme.<br />
ii. The programme would share the core course component with the MA Film<br />
Studies, as well as make use of some specialist modules.<br />
iii. The Board commended the st<strong>and</strong>ard of documentation received <strong>and</strong><br />
reported that the MA Documentary Practice was a well-developed proposal.<br />
iv. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal <strong>and</strong> associated<br />
module proposal.<br />
ii. BA History <strong>and</strong> German (Part 2)<br />
PMAB2010-057<br />
2010:052 The Board considered a Part 2 programme proposal for the BA History <strong>and</strong><br />
German <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The programme would be offered full-time over 3 academic years, <strong>and</strong> over<br />
4 academic years where students opted to incorporate a year’s study<br />
abroad.<br />
ii. All of the modules detailed in the documentation were approved modules,<br />
although some were missing module codes.<br />
iii. Further information would be needed with regard to the precise programme<br />
structure. It was agreed that this matter would be discussed outside of the<br />
meeting.<br />
Action: SLLF / AR<br />
iv. The final award title required clarification, as there was some discussion<br />
over whether the title was ‘History <strong>and</strong> German’ or ‘German <strong>and</strong> History’.<br />
Action: SLLF<br />
v. The programme would be managed in the same way other internal<br />
collaborations between the two schools are managed. The responsibilities of<br />
each respective school were also detailed in a written agreement.
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
vi. The Board approved the Part 2 programme proposal.<br />
School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
12. Blizard Institute of Cell <strong>and</strong> Molecular Science<br />
PgCert Applied Practical Research for Nurses <strong>and</strong> Allied Health<br />
Professionals (Part 1)<br />
PMAB2010-058<br />
2010:053 The Board considered a Part 1 programme proposal for the PgCert Applied<br />
Practical Research for Nurses <strong>and</strong> Allied Health Professionals <strong>and</strong> noted the<br />
following:<br />
i. The proposed fee for overseas students required further clarification <strong>and</strong><br />
discussion within the School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry. Costing <strong>and</strong> Pricing<br />
Group would also have to be consulted <strong>and</strong> approve the proposed fee.<br />
Action: ME<br />
ii. The programme had principally been devised because there were currently<br />
no formal <strong>and</strong> accredited courses which research nurses <strong>and</strong> other allied<br />
health professionals could undertake to enhance their career pathway. This<br />
was also the case for clinical industry research associates.<br />
iii. There was a clear academic rationale for the development of the<br />
programme, which the Board commended.<br />
iv. The 4 modules for the PgCert were confirmed as compulsory <strong>and</strong> not<br />
elective modules as originally specified. This required addressing in the Part<br />
1 form.<br />
v. Given the nature of the programme, the Board questioned whether there<br />
was scope for applying for professional accreditation. It was expressed that<br />
preliminary discussions with relevant professional bodies had taken place<br />
<strong>and</strong> that, where possible, professional accreditation would be sought.<br />
vi. The Board approved the Part 1 programme proposal subject to the<br />
clarification of the proposed fees for overseas students. The fee must also<br />
be formally approved before the programme can be advertised.<br />
Action: ME<br />
13. William Harvey Research Institute<br />
MSc, PgDip <strong>and</strong> PgCert Musculoskeletal Sciences (Part 1)<br />
PMAB2010-059<br />
2010:054 The Board considered a Part 1 programme proposal for the MSc, PgDip <strong>and</strong><br />
PgCert Musculoskeletal Sciences <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The MSc in Musculoskeletal Clinical Science would provide a one year<br />
programme leading to a higher degree with options for clinicians, scientists<br />
<strong>and</strong> allied health professional who wished to specialize in musculoskeletal<br />
medicine, rheumatology, <strong>and</strong> sciences. The programme would also enable<br />
students to do a clinical rotation <strong>and</strong> this was quite a unique development<br />
within the UK.<br />
ii. The specified non-st<strong>and</strong>ard fees had been approved by the Costing <strong>and</strong>
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
Pricing Group <strong>and</strong> a detailed business case had been submitted to support<br />
the proposal.<br />
iii. The proposed structure was similar to that of the existing MSc Sports <strong>and</strong><br />
Exercise Medicine.<br />
iv. The part-time mode of study would be offered over 2 years.<br />
v. The programme was structured around two distinct pathways; a Clinical<br />
Pathway <strong>and</strong> a Scientific Pathway. However, students would receive the<br />
same award title regardless of which pathway they elected to take.<br />
vi. The rationale for not differentiating between the two streams by titles was<br />
debated by the Board <strong>and</strong> it was suggested that the option for dedicated<br />
titles should be revisited. Any change in titles would be addressed in a<br />
revised Part 1 from.<br />
Action: MS<br />
vii. Given that the programme aimed to recruit overseas students, the need for<br />
student clinicians to be registered with the General Medical <strong>Council</strong> (GMC)<br />
was raised. It was understood that overseas students would not be<br />
disadvantaged compared with home students due to this restriction. This<br />
practice also operated on the existing MSc Sports <strong>and</strong> Exercise Medicine,<br />
which attracted a number of overseas students.<br />
viii. The use of variable mode of study <strong>and</strong> option to complete the programme in<br />
4 years was discussed since this was the practice adopted for the MSc<br />
Sports <strong>and</strong> Exercise Medicine. This issue would be discussed <strong>and</strong> confirmed<br />
outside of the meeting.<br />
Action: MS / AR<br />
ix. The Board approved the Part 1 programme proposal subject to the<br />
clarification of the points detailed above <strong>and</strong>, if necessary, the submission of<br />
revised Part 1 from.<br />
Part 4 – Programme Amendments<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
Faculty of Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences<br />
14. School of Business Management<br />
i. MSc International Human Resource Management <strong>and</strong><br />
Employment Relations (N1S3)<br />
PMAB2010-060<br />
2010:055 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
MSc International Human Resource Management <strong>and</strong> Employment Relations.<br />
ii. MSc Global Business (N1Q3)<br />
PMAB2010-061<br />
2010:056 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
MSc Global Business.<br />
15. School of Geography
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
i. MSc Integrated Management of Freshwater Environments (F7S1,<br />
F7S2)<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
PMAB2010-062<br />
2010:057 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the MSc Integrated<br />
Management of Freshwater Environments <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The programme amendment related to a change in programme title to ‘MSc<br />
Environmental Science: Integrated Management of Freshwater<br />
Environments’.<br />
ii. The Board approved the programme amendment to the MSc Integrated<br />
Management of Freshwater Environments.<br />
ii. BSc (Econ) Geography with Business Management (F8N1)<br />
PMAB2010-063<br />
2010:058 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BSc (Econ)<br />
Geography with Business Management <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The programme amendment related to a change in award qualification from<br />
BSc (Econ) to BSc, which was proposed to apply from September 2012.<br />
ii. The current BSc (Econ) qualification was an anomaly among the combined<br />
'with Business Management' programmes offered by <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>. These<br />
programmes resulted in the award of a BA or BSc.<br />
iii. The amendment also detailed a proposal to create a dedicated pathway for<br />
students interested in studying physical geography.<br />
iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc (Econ)<br />
Geography with Business Management.<br />
16. School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
BA Year Abroad/placement programmes<br />
PMAB2010-064<br />
2010:059 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BA Year<br />
Abroad/placement programmes <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The increase in the value of the Year Abroad Assessment modules would<br />
not affect a students' degree classification, as the mean for the Year Abroad<br />
Assessment module would be unchanged (the School currently uses the L3<br />
mean of 1:2:2:4 for 4-year degree programmes).<br />
ii. The Board questioned whether this proposal effectively condoned failure for<br />
a year but it was confirmed that this was not the case.<br />
iii. A change to the award rules for BA Year Abroad/placement programmes<br />
would be necessary.<br />
iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BA Year<br />
Abroad/placement programmes.<br />
17. Centre for Commercial Law Studies<br />
MSc Law <strong>and</strong> Finance (M3S7, M3S8)<br />
PMAB2010-065
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
2010:060 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the MSc Law <strong>and</strong><br />
Finance <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The amendment related to a slight change in programme structure <strong>and</strong> the<br />
modules offered to students.<br />
ii. Within the specialisations, the status of modules should be listed as<br />
compulsory <strong>and</strong> not core. This required a change to the Programme<br />
Amendment Form <strong>and</strong> Programme Specification that were submitted.<br />
iii. The module proposal for ‘Financial Derivatives in a Legal Context’ was<br />
missing from the paperwork <strong>and</strong> could therefore not be approved. It was<br />
expressed that this module would be submitted at the next meeting of<br />
PMAB.<br />
iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the MSc Law <strong>and</strong><br />
Finance, subject to the revision <strong>and</strong> resubmission of the Programme<br />
Amendment Form <strong>and</strong> Programme Specification. The revised<br />
documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />
Action: CCLS / Chair<br />
Faculty of Science <strong>and</strong> Engineering<br />
18. School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />
i. BSc Biology with Psychology (C1C8) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module<br />
proposal (Advanced Aquatic Biology)<br />
PMAB2010-066<br />
2010:061 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BSc Biology with<br />
Psychology <strong>and</strong> 1 associated module proposal <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme,<br />
including changes to the modules offered <strong>and</strong> the status of modules.<br />
ii. The module proposal for Advanced Aquatic Biology would be resubmitted to<br />
the next meeting of PMAB for consideration <strong>and</strong> approval. This was because<br />
the content of the module required further refinement in order to incorporate<br />
additional core content from the two modules it would replace.<br />
iii. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc Biology with<br />
Psychology.<br />
iv. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />
Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />
Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />
be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />
presented where necessary.<br />
Action: SBCS<br />
v. Given the need to develop the Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal<br />
<strong>and</strong> incorporate additional content, the proposal was not approved. A<br />
revised proposal would be submitted to the next meeting of PMAB.<br />
Action: SBCS<br />
ii. BSc Zoology with Aquatic Biology (C3C1) <strong>and</strong> 3 associated<br />
module proposals:<br />
PMAB2010-067
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
Advanced Aquatic Biology<br />
Aquatic Biology Research Project<br />
Aquatic biology Investigative Project<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
2010:062 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BSc Zoology with<br />
Aquatic Biology <strong>and</strong> 3 associated module proposals <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme,<br />
including changes to the modules offered <strong>and</strong> the status of modules. It<br />
would apply from September 2011, not September 2010 as stated in the<br />
form. This issue would be clarified in a revised form.<br />
ii. Students had raised concern with the proposed programme amendments<br />
<strong>and</strong> the withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic<br />
Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be<br />
replaced by Advanced Aquatic Biology.<br />
iii. Current students <strong>and</strong> the external examiner had not been consulted over the<br />
withdrawal of SBC316 <strong>and</strong> SBC314, <strong>and</strong> introduction of Advanced Aquatic<br />
Biology.<br />
iv. Existing publicity material made reference to the two proposed withdrawn<br />
modules <strong>and</strong> their content. However, this was because marketing materials<br />
were usually produced a year in advance. A clear statement was also<br />
detailed in promotional materials to indicate that the precise module offering<br />
<strong>and</strong> subjects taught may be subject to change.<br />
v. A number of papers were tabled at the meeting that related to the above<br />
issue raised by students including; a summary of the reported issue; a<br />
published course synopsis <strong>and</strong> flyer for the BSc Zoology with Aquatic<br />
Biology; published module summaries for Marine Biology, Freshwater<br />
Biology <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy <strong>and</strong> Management; <strong>and</strong> a<br />
petition signed by students.<br />
vi. Following discussion it was articulated that a number of students who had<br />
signed the petition were not students enrolled on the programme. As such, a<br />
number of these students would not be directly affected by the proposed<br />
amendments / withdrawals.<br />
vii. In response to the issues raised by students, the School of Biological <strong>and</strong><br />
Chemical Sciences agreed that the module proposal for Advanced Aquatic<br />
Biology would be resubmitted to the next meeting of PMAB for consideration<br />
<strong>and</strong> approval. The content of the module would be refined in order to<br />
incorporate additional core content from the two modules it would replace.<br />
Appropriate consultation with the external examiner <strong>and</strong> students would also<br />
take place.<br />
viii. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc Zoology with<br />
Aquatic Biology.<br />
ix. The Board approved the module proposals for Aquatic Biology Research<br />
Project <strong>and</strong> Aquatic biology Investigative Project, subject to clarifying a<br />
number of issues that were discussed outside of the meeting <strong>and</strong> the<br />
submission of revised module proposal forms. The revised documentation<br />
would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />
Action: SBCS
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
x. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />
Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />
Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />
be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />
presented where necessary.<br />
xi. Given the need to develop the Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal<br />
<strong>and</strong> incorporate additional content in response to the issues identified<br />
above, the proposal was not approved. A revised proposal would be<br />
submitted to the next meeting of PMAB.<br />
Action: SBCS<br />
iii. BSc Biology (C100) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module (Advanced<br />
Aquatic Biology)<br />
PMAB2010-068<br />
2010:063 The Board considered a programme amendment <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module to<br />
apply to the BSc Biology <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme,<br />
specifically changes to the modules offered. It would apply from September<br />
2011, not September 2010 as stated in the form. This would be clarified in a<br />
revised form.<br />
ii. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />
Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />
Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />
be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />
presented where necessary.<br />
iii. The Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal was not approved (see<br />
above for further details). A revised proposal would be submitted to the next<br />
meeting of PMAB.<br />
iv. The Board approved the programme amendment to the BSc Biology.<br />
iv. BSc Zoology (C300) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module (Advanced<br />
Aquatic Biology)<br />
PMAB2010-069<br />
2010:064 The Board considered a programme amendment <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module to<br />
apply to the BSc Zoology <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The amendment related to a change in the structure of the programme.<br />
ii. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />
Science, Policy & Management (SBC314), which would be replaced by<br />
Advanced Aquatic Biology, were not approved. These withdrawals would<br />
be reconsidered at the next meeting of PMAB <strong>and</strong> revised withdrawal forms<br />
presented where necessary.<br />
iii. The Advanced Aquatic Biology module proposal was not approved (see<br />
above for further details). A revised proposal would be submitted to the next<br />
meeting of PMAB.<br />
iv. The Board did not approve the programme amendment to the BSc Zoology.
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
v. BSc Biochemistry (C700) PMAB2010-070<br />
2010:065 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
BSc Biochemistry.<br />
vi. BSc Psychology (C800) <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new module<br />
(Consciousness <strong>and</strong> Causality)<br />
PMAB2010-071<br />
2010:066 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> a programme amendment <strong>and</strong> 1 associated new<br />
module to apply to the BSc Psychology <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. Two computer science modules would be removed from the programme.<br />
ii. A new optional module, Consciousness <strong>and</strong> Causality, would be offered to<br />
students taking the programme.<br />
iii. Part of the teaching of the programme was delivered by colleagues from the<br />
Institute of Health Sciences Education (IHSE).<br />
iv. The Dean for Taught Programmes (Science <strong>and</strong> Engineering), students <strong>and</strong><br />
the external examiner had been consulted <strong>and</strong> supported the amendment.<br />
v. The Board approved the programme amendment.<br />
vi. The Board approved the module proposal for Consciousness <strong>and</strong> Causality,<br />
subject to the clarification of a number of issues that were discussed outside<br />
of the meeting <strong>and</strong> the submission of revised module proposal forms. The<br />
revised documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s<br />
Action.<br />
Action: SBCS<br />
vii. BSc Medical Genetics (C431)<br />
PMAB2010-072<br />
2010:067 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
BSc Medical Genetics.<br />
viii. BSc Chemistry with Biochemistry (F1C7)<br />
PMAB2010-073<br />
2010:068 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
BSc Chemistry with Biochemistry.<br />
ix. BSc Chemistry with Forensic Science (F1F4)<br />
PMAB2010-074<br />
2010:069 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
BSc Chemistry with Forensic Science.<br />
x. BSc Chemistry with Business Management (F1N2) PMAB2010-075<br />
2010:070 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
BSc Chemistry with Business Management.<br />
xi. BSc Chemistry (F100)<br />
PMAB2010-076<br />
2010:071 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
BSc Chemistry.
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
xii. BSc Pharmaceutical Chemistry (F151)<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
PMAB2010-077<br />
2010:072 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
BSc Pharmaceutical Chemistry.<br />
xiii. MSci Pharmaceutical Chemistry (F152)<br />
PMAB2010-078<br />
2010:073 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
MSci Pharmaceutical Chemistry.<br />
19. School of Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />
BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng Programmes with Industrial Experience <strong>and</strong> 4<br />
associated module proposals:<br />
PMAB2010-079<br />
Engineering Industrial Experience<br />
Engineering Industrial Experience<br />
Materials Industrial Experience<br />
Materials Industrial Experience<br />
2010:074 The Board considered a programme amendment to apply to the BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng<br />
Programmes with Industrial Experience <strong>and</strong> 4 associated module proposals <strong>and</strong><br />
noted the following:<br />
i. The proposed amendment would give students the opportunity to undertake<br />
a one year industrial placement.<br />
ii. The proposed modules comprised 120 credits <strong>and</strong> did not contain any<br />
formal assessment that would feed into a student’s final classification.<br />
iii. It was expressed that the School of Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />
(SEMS) would charge half-fees for those students wishing to opt to take an<br />
industrial placement. This decision would also provide funds to recruit a<br />
placement officer to help facilitate students getting placements.<br />
iv. Board members stated that there was a clear need to ascertain that<br />
placement providers have had the appropriate quality assurance checks,<br />
<strong>and</strong> that students were actually benefiting from time spent with placement<br />
providers.<br />
v. The Industrial Experience model put forward by SEMS differed from the<br />
existing, well-established, model that was in operation within the School of<br />
Electrical Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science (SEECS) <strong>and</strong> the School of<br />
Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film (SLLF). As such, the Board suggested it<br />
would be useful to explore the contrasting model put forward by SEMS<br />
further, <strong>and</strong> consult SEECS <strong>and</strong> SLLF to capture good practice.<br />
vi. The Board deferred this amendment <strong>and</strong> the associated module proposals<br />
to the next meeting of PMAB, pending further discussion outside of the<br />
meeting.<br />
Action: SEMS / PMc<br />
Language <strong>and</strong> Learning Unit<br />
20i. International Foundation Programme in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong><br />
Humanities<br />
PMAB2010-080
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
2010:075 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
International Foundation Programme in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong> Humanities.<br />
20ii. Pre-Masters Diploma in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong> Humanities PMAB2010-081<br />
2010:076 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a programme amendment to apply to the<br />
Pre-Masters Diploma in Social Sciences <strong>and</strong> Humanities.<br />
Part 5 – Programme Withdrawals<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
21. Summary of Programme Withdrawals:<br />
n/a<br />
i. BSc Mathematics <strong>and</strong> Physics (FG31)<br />
ii. MSc Primary Care (Multiple Codes)<br />
o MSc Primary Care (with City University)<br />
o MSc Primary Care (District Nursing )(with City<br />
University)<br />
o MSc Primary Care (Long Term Conditions)(with City<br />
University)<br />
o MSc Primary Care (Nurse Practitioner)(with City<br />
University)<br />
o PG Dip Primary Care(with City University)<br />
o PG Dip(District Nursing)(with City University)<br />
o PG Dip Primary Care (Long Term Conditions)(with City<br />
University)<br />
o PG Dip (Nurse Practitioner) (with City University)<br />
iii. Postgraduate Diploma in Aesthetic Surgery (A3D1)<br />
iv. MSc Public Health (Multiple Codes)<br />
o MSc Public Health (with City University)<br />
o MSc Public Health <strong>and</strong> Health Economics (with City<br />
University)<br />
o MSc Public Health <strong>and</strong> Urban Renewal (with City<br />
University)<br />
o MSc Public Health with Food Policy (with City<br />
University)<br />
o MSc Specialist Community Public Health Nursing<br />
(Health Visiting) (with City University)<br />
o MSc Specialist Community Public Health Nursing<br />
(School Nursing) (with City University)
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
v. BA German <strong>and</strong> Geography (LR72)<br />
vi. BA Russian <strong>and</strong> Geography (LR77)<br />
vii. BA German <strong>and</strong> Geography (LRFZ)<br />
viii. BA Russian <strong>and</strong> Geography (LRHZ)<br />
ix. BSc Natural Sciences (CFGO)<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
2010:077 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved the programme withdrawals detailed above.<br />
These withdrawals had been approved by ATRPG.<br />
Part 6 – Module Proposals<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
Faculty of Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Sciences<br />
22. School of Business Management<br />
i. Advanced Accounting for Business PMAB2010-082<br />
2010:078 The Board considered a module proposal for Advanced Accounting for Business<br />
<strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The module comprised a one hour lecture per week over 11 weeks (totalling<br />
11 hours) <strong>and</strong> a one hour seminar per week (totalling 10 hours). As such,<br />
the Board questioned why there would be one less seminar. This issue<br />
would require clarification by the School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />
ii. The Board approved the module proposal subject to the clarification of the<br />
points detailed above.<br />
Action: SBM<br />
ii. Management Skills <strong>and</strong> Development<br />
PMAB2010-083<br />
2010:079 The Board considered a module proposal for Management Skills <strong>and</strong> Development<br />
<strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The module comprised a one hour lecture per week over 11 weeks (totalling<br />
11 hours) <strong>and</strong> a one hour seminar per week (totalling 10 hours). As such,<br />
the Board questioned why there would be one less seminar. This would<br />
require clarification by the School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />
ii. The JACS code was missing from the module proposal form <strong>and</strong> required<br />
clarification.<br />
iii. The Board approved the module proposal subject to the clarification of the<br />
points detailed above.<br />
Action: SBM<br />
23. School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Econometrics C<br />
PMAB2010-084<br />
2010:080 The Board deferred this item to the next meeting of PMAB.
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
24. School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Germany Today<br />
Catalan Cinema<br />
Venice - Explorations of an urban artscape<br />
Modern/Postmodern Cinema<br />
La Nouvelle Vague<br />
Corpus Linguistics<br />
Digital Literacy <strong>and</strong> Intercultural Communication<br />
The Return of the Renaissance in 19th century Europe <strong>and</strong> its<br />
narrative <strong>and</strong> intellectual contexts<br />
Film Archaeology<br />
Women's Writing in Early Modern France<br />
German Sociolinguistics<br />
Spanish Translation: Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice<br />
Russian Documentary Film 2 (level 5)<br />
Russian Documentary Film 2 (level 6)<br />
Introduction to the Structure <strong>and</strong> Varieties of Modern German<br />
The German Aphorism: a form of thought<br />
Approaches to African Cinema<br />
PMAB2010-085<br />
PMAB2010-086<br />
PMAB2010-087<br />
PMAB2010-088<br />
PMAB2010-089<br />
PMAB2010-090<br />
PMAB2010-091<br />
PMAB2010-092<br />
PMAB2010-093<br />
PMAB2010-094<br />
PMAB2010-095<br />
PMAB2010-096<br />
PMAB2010-097<br />
PMAB2010-098<br />
PMAB2010-099<br />
PMAB2010-100<br />
PMAB2010-101<br />
2010:081 The Board considered a number of module proposals from the School of<br />
Languages Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film (detailed above) <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
25. School of Law<br />
i. The Board commended the exemplary st<strong>and</strong>ard of module proposals<br />
presented to PMAB.<br />
ii. Modules for The Return of the Renaissance in 19 th Century Europe <strong>and</strong> The<br />
German Aphorism: a form of thought indicated September 2010 as the<br />
module start date. This information was understood to be incorrect <strong>and</strong><br />
would be amended accordingly to September 2011.<br />
Action: SLLF<br />
i. Modern Legal History PMAB2010-102<br />
2010:082 The Board considered a module proposal for Modern Legal History <strong>and</strong> noted the<br />
following:<br />
i. The module would also be made available to associate students in<br />
Semester A <strong>and</strong> Semester B. Consequently, the module proposal form<br />
would need to be amended to reflect this.<br />
ii. The Board approved the module proposal subject the submission of revised<br />
module proposal form to address the above issues. The revised<br />
documentation would be considered outside of the Board by Chair’s Action.<br />
Action: Law / Chair<br />
ii. Remedies in Private Law<br />
PMAB2010-103<br />
2010:083 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a module proposal for Remedies in Private<br />
Law.<br />
iii. Further Contract Law<br />
PMAB2010-104
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
2010:084 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved a module proposal for Further Contract Law.<br />
Faculty of Science <strong>and</strong> Engineering<br />
26. School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />
Molecules <strong>and</strong> Ions at Interfaces by Distance Learning<br />
PMAB2010-105<br />
2010:085 The Board considered a module proposal for Molecules <strong>and</strong> Ions at Interfaces by<br />
Distance Learning <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The module was first submitted at the Extraordinary Programmes<br />
Committee meeting in April 2010 <strong>and</strong> was not approved. A number of issues<br />
were raised, particularly regarding the use of distance learning as well as the<br />
need to enhance the learning outcomes to reflect the number 6 academic<br />
level.<br />
ii. The resubmitted module proposal had addressed these points; Distance<br />
Learning materials were going to be designed in conjunction with colleagues<br />
in the QM E-Learning Unit. The learning outcomes had also been improved.<br />
iii. Since the proposal was a resubmission the Board confirmed that all points<br />
had been addressed.<br />
iv. The Board approved the module proposal.<br />
Part 7 – Module Updates<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
Summary of Approved Module Updates<br />
27. School of Physics:<br />
Mathematical Techniques I (PHY121)<br />
Statistical Physics (PHY403)<br />
n/a<br />
2010:086 The Board noted the approved module updates detailed above from the School of<br />
Physics.<br />
28. School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management:<br />
Marketing (BUS011)<br />
Financial Accounting (BUS021)<br />
Managerial Accounting (BUS022)<br />
Organisation <strong>and</strong> Identity (BUS302)<br />
n/a<br />
2010:087 The Board noted the approved module updates detailed above from the School of<br />
Business <strong>and</strong> Management.<br />
Part 8 – Module Withdrawals<br />
<strong>Paper</strong>
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
Summary of Module Withdrawals to Approve<br />
29. Institute of Health Sciences Education:<br />
Injection (IHSM925)<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
n/a<br />
2010:088 The Board considered <strong>and</strong> approved the withdrawal of the Injection module.<br />
30. School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences:<br />
Freshwater Biology (SBC316)<br />
Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management<br />
(SBC314)<br />
Introduction to Forensic Chemistry (SBC371)<br />
Forensic Science & the Legal Process (SBS645)<br />
Ecosystem Ecology (SBC303 <strong>and</strong> SBS303)<br />
Techniques for Biochemists (SBS930)<br />
n/a<br />
2010:089 The Board considered module withdrawals for the modules detailed above <strong>and</strong><br />
noted the following:<br />
i. The withdrawal of Freshwater Biology (SBC316) <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />
Science, Policy & Management (SBC314) would be deferred to the next<br />
meeting.<br />
Action: SBCS<br />
ii. The Board approved module withdrawals for SBC371, SBS645, SBC303<br />
<strong>and</strong> SBS303, <strong>and</strong> SBS930.<br />
Part 9 - Regulations<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
31. Special Regulations for the Learning Institute Accredited<br />
Programmes<br />
PMAB2010-106<br />
2010:090 The Board considered a proposal to implement special assessment regulations for<br />
the Learning Institute Accredited Programmes <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. The examination board for programmes from the Learning Institute did not<br />
match st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> practice. The programmes did also not report<br />
to a Degree Examination Board.<br />
ii. Under the current <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> structure the Learning Institute was not an<br />
academic department. Further clarification was required outside of the<br />
meeting regarding the organisation of the Learning Institute within <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>. Specifically, this related to the delivery of academic credit bearing<br />
courses in non-academic departments.<br />
iii. As an interim measure for this academic year only, the Learning Institute<br />
would seek permission to be included in the SMD Degree Exam Board. The<br />
rationale for this was because the award was previously housed within SMD.<br />
The Dean for Taught Programmes (SMD) would also need to support the<br />
proposed temporary relocation of the Learning Institute.
PMAB Unconfirmed minutes / 23 rd February 2011<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-107<br />
iv. The Board did not approve the special regulations <strong>and</strong> voiced concerns<br />
regarding the delivery of academic credit bearing courses in non-academic<br />
departments. Instead, an interim measure would operate for the 2010-11<br />
academic year only (see above).<br />
Part 10 – Other business<br />
<strong>Paper</strong><br />
32. Any other business n/a<br />
The Operation of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board<br />
2010:091 The Board briefly discussed the operation of the current programme <strong>and</strong> module<br />
approval process <strong>and</strong> PMAB <strong>and</strong> noted the following:<br />
i. Given the volume of revisions <strong>and</strong> new additions to programmes <strong>and</strong><br />
modules received via PMAB, colleagues questioned whether such changes<br />
would ultimately affect the structure <strong>and</strong> currency of programmes <strong>and</strong><br />
modules.<br />
ii. It was apparent that the communication between schools <strong>and</strong> students was<br />
somewhat variable <strong>and</strong> raised some concerns.<br />
iii. The Board agreed to allocate one of the next two meetings of PMAB as a<br />
discussion meeting in order to take stock of various issues related to<br />
programme <strong>and</strong> module approvals, <strong>and</strong> to determine how the role of the<br />
Board is progressing.<br />
33. Dates of next meeting<br />
2010:092 The meeting date of the Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board<br />
is Thursday 31st March 2011 (12-2pm) in GO Jones 602.<br />
The deadline for papers for this meeting is Thursday 10th March.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
Matters Arising Action Sheet<br />
PMAB 20 th October 2010<br />
PMAB 24 th November 2010<br />
PMAB 23 rd February 2011<br />
Key<br />
= Completed<br />
= Outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
Programme Proposals<br />
Minute Programme Details Action Progress / Comments Responsibility Programme<br />
Organiser<br />
2010:005 LLM/PgDip/PgCert<br />
Intellectual Property<br />
Law (Part 1)<br />
[October<br />
PMAB]<br />
The aims <strong>and</strong> learning outcomes required<br />
further work, particularly in order to fully<br />
reflect that the programme was a level 7<br />
programme.<br />
The JACS code for the programme was<br />
missing <strong>and</strong> was required for completeness.<br />
The Part 2 form would need to clearly identify<br />
which modules were already approved <strong>and</strong><br />
would form part of the programme (along with<br />
their associated module codes), as well as<br />
detail any new modules <strong>and</strong> incorporate new<br />
module proposal forms.<br />
Revised Part 1 Programme<br />
Proposal form outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
CCLS<br />
Noam<br />
Shemtov<br />
2010:006<br />
[October<br />
PMAB]<br />
MSc Digital Music<br />
Technology <strong>and</strong> MSc<br />
Digital Signal<br />
Processing (Part 1)<br />
Student administration would be h<strong>and</strong>led by<br />
UoL. This was not clear within the proposals<br />
<strong>and</strong> required further clarification. It was<br />
understood that UoL would award the degree<br />
but that <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> would function as the<br />
lead College.<br />
Revised Part 1 Programme<br />
Proposal forms outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
SEECS<br />
Jane Reid
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
The learning outcomes for both programmes<br />
required significant attention, as they did not<br />
accurately reflect level 7 learning outcomes.<br />
Learning outcomes should be more detailed<br />
in order to articulate the level of the<br />
programmes. The number of learning<br />
outcomes could also benefit from attention to<br />
ensure that the expectations of student<br />
learning on the programmes were better<br />
reflected.<br />
It was expressed that both MSc programmes<br />
would need to comply with UoL <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> regulations but this would be clarified by<br />
SEECS. The MSc programmes would comply<br />
with the normal SEECS regulations for award<br />
of Distinction <strong>and</strong> Merit <strong>and</strong> for progression.<br />
Representatives from UoL would attend the<br />
Board when the Part 2 Programme Proposals<br />
were submitted in order to discuss issues<br />
further <strong>and</strong> confer approval from a UoL<br />
perspective.<br />
2010:007<br />
[October<br />
PMAB]<br />
BSc Multimedia <strong>and</strong><br />
Arts Technology (Part<br />
1)<br />
The modules Production Skills (FLM016) <strong>and</strong><br />
Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique would not be offered<br />
on the programme, as further clarification with<br />
the School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
regarding any possible module contributions<br />
was required. Given that these modules<br />
would be removed, it was understood that<br />
they would be replaced by two newly created<br />
SEECS modules.<br />
Revised Part 1 Programme<br />
Proposal form outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
SEECS<br />
Jane Reid<br />
The module Emergent Multimedia<br />
Applications <strong>and</strong> Technologies (ELEM040)<br />
was a level 7 module <strong>and</strong> as such could not<br />
be offered on a level 6 programme.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
2010:008<br />
[October<br />
PMAB]<br />
BSc Multimedia <strong>and</strong><br />
Arts Technology with<br />
Industrial Experience<br />
(Part 1)<br />
Some of the learning outcomes, such as<br />
those relating to for transferable / personal<br />
skills, required further expansion, as they did<br />
not accurately reflect level 6 learning<br />
outcomes. Learning outcomes should be<br />
more detailed in order to articulate the level of<br />
the programme.<br />
The module Production Skills (FLM016) <strong>and</strong><br />
Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique would not be<br />
offered on the programme, as further<br />
clarification with the School of Languages,<br />
Linguistics & Film regarding any possible<br />
module contributions was required. Given that<br />
these modules would be removed, it was<br />
understood that they would be replaced by<br />
two newly created SEECS modules.<br />
The module Emergent Multimedia<br />
Applications <strong>and</strong> Technologies (ELEM040)<br />
was a level 7 module <strong>and</strong> as such should not<br />
be offered on a level 6 programme.<br />
Revised Part 1 Programme<br />
Proposal form outst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
SEECS<br />
Jane Reid<br />
Some of the learning outcomes, such as<br />
those relating to transferable / personal skills,<br />
required further expansion, as these did not<br />
accurately reflect level 6 learning outcomes.<br />
Learning outcomes should be more detailed<br />
in order to articulate the level of the<br />
programmes.<br />
The correct programme duration was 4 years,<br />
not 3 years as specified on the original form.<br />
2010:026<br />
[November<br />
MA Linguistics (Part<br />
2 <strong>and</strong> associated<br />
module proposals<br />
The learning outcomes for a number of<br />
modules could benefit from further work <strong>and</strong><br />
refinement, particularly in order to fully reflect<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
is fine.<br />
SLLF<br />
Prof. D<br />
Adger
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
PMAB]<br />
x19*)<br />
*see PMAB papers<br />
for full details of<br />
modules.<br />
that modules are level 7 modules.<br />
The learning outcomes for the modules<br />
detailed below, in particular, would benefit<br />
from further attention:<br />
Revised Module Proposal<br />
forms required in order to<br />
address comments<br />
regarding learning<br />
outcomes.<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
o<br />
Qualitative Research Methods<br />
Dissertation Proseminar<br />
MA Dissertation Linguistics<br />
From Morpheme to Meaning, Formal<br />
Methods <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />
Youth Language<br />
Language Style <strong>and</strong> Stylization<br />
Research Practicum<br />
Topics in the Grammar of a Language<br />
Family or Group<br />
Understudied Languages <strong>and</strong> Linguistic<br />
Theory<br />
Bilingualism<br />
The module aims for the MA Dissertation<br />
Linguistics module required enhancement<br />
<strong>and</strong> further detail.<br />
The reading list for Applied Sociophonetics<br />
<strong>and</strong> Phonology module did not contain the<br />
publication dates of materials. These details<br />
were required in order that that the Board<br />
could gauge how current the reading<br />
materials were.<br />
2010:029<br />
[November<br />
PMAB]<br />
MSc/PgDip Trauma<br />
Science <strong>and</strong><br />
MSc/PgDip Trauma<br />
Science (Military &<br />
Austere) (Part 1)<br />
Through discussion it was understood that the<br />
postgraduate diploma element of the<br />
programme would be delivered full-time over<br />
1 year, whereas the MSc would be delivered<br />
part-time over 2 years. This issue required<br />
clarification on the Part 1 proposal form.<br />
Revised Part 1 Programme<br />
Proposal form submitted.<br />
The PgDip will not be<br />
offered as a st<strong>and</strong> alone<br />
programme <strong>and</strong> this had<br />
been addressed within the<br />
BICMS<br />
Dr. S.<br />
Eaglestone
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
The entry requirements required clarification<br />
for students with a non-medical degree.<br />
Given that the programme could attract<br />
international applicants the Board agreed that<br />
the level of a student’s English language<br />
proficiency for the programme needed to be<br />
clear <strong>and</strong> should be addressed. This included<br />
details of any required IELTS / TOEFL score.<br />
The precise fee proposed for the MSc <strong>and</strong><br />
postgraduate diploma element was a nonst<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
fee <strong>and</strong> required further clarification<br />
<strong>and</strong> approval from the Fees Office <strong>and</strong><br />
Costing <strong>and</strong> Pricing Group outside of the<br />
Board.<br />
revised Part 1 form.<br />
IELTS / TOEFL score<br />
clarified.<br />
Fees still require CPG<br />
approval.<br />
2010:048<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
MSc Finance (Part 2)<br />
The comments provided by the external<br />
advisor were not sufficiently detailed <strong>and</strong><br />
required revision. A detailed appraisal of the<br />
proposal by an external advisor should be<br />
carried out using information obtained in the<br />
External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
The programme’s learning outcomes needed<br />
to be revisited, as some did not correspond<br />
with the suggested headings of knowledge<br />
<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing, intellectual skills,<br />
transferable skills, <strong>and</strong> practical skills.<br />
According to the programme structure five<br />
modules were listed as core modules but<br />
following discussion it was suggested that<br />
they should be listed as compulsory with the<br />
dissertation listed as a core module. The<br />
designation of module status would comply<br />
with the practice adopted elsewhere within<br />
the School.<br />
Revised Part 2 Programme<br />
Proposal <strong>and</strong> revised<br />
Module Proposal form<br />
submitted <strong>and</strong> all issues<br />
raised have been<br />
addressed.<br />
SEF<br />
Prof. Francis<br />
Breedon
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
The learning outcomes for the Investments<br />
module required further work <strong>and</strong> more detail<br />
in order to fully reflect that the module was at<br />
level 7. Specifically, a number of outcomes,<br />
such as ‘to work in teams’ <strong>and</strong> ‘to work to<br />
deadlines’ were deemed not sufficiently<br />
detailed by Board members<br />
2010:054<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
MSc, PgDip <strong>and</strong><br />
PgCert<br />
Musculoskeletal<br />
Sciences (Part 1)<br />
The rationale for not differentiating between<br />
the two streams by titles was debated by the<br />
Board <strong>and</strong> it was suggested that the option for<br />
dedicated titles should be revisited. Any<br />
change in titles would be addressed in a<br />
revised Part 1 from.<br />
Revised Part 1 Programme<br />
Proposal <strong>and</strong> revised<br />
Module Proposal form<br />
required in order to address<br />
PMAB comments.<br />
Clinical track will be called’<br />
MSc Musculoskeletal<br />
Clinical Sciences’, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Science track<br />
‘Musculoskeletal Science’.<br />
WHRI<br />
Dr Michael<br />
Seed<br />
The OSCE element will be<br />
changed to Observation<br />
Structured Assessment<br />
(OSA) which will have no<br />
clinical skills component.<br />
Programme Amendments<br />
Minute Programme Details Action Progress /<br />
Comments<br />
2010:060 MSc Law <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
(M3S7, M3S8)<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
Within the specialisations, the status of modules<br />
should be listed as compulsory <strong>and</strong> not core. This<br />
required a change to the Programme Amendment<br />
Form <strong>and</strong> Programme Specification that were<br />
submitted.<br />
Revised<br />
Programme<br />
Amendment<br />
Form <strong>and</strong><br />
Programme<br />
Specification<br />
submitted.<br />
Responsibility<br />
CCLS<br />
Programme<br />
Organiser<br />
Dr. Leon<br />
Vinokur
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
2010:062<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
BSc Zoology with<br />
Aquatic Biology (C3C1)<br />
The module proposals for Aquatic Biology<br />
Research Project <strong>and</strong> Aquatic biology<br />
Investigative Project required a number of issues<br />
that were discussed outside of the meeting to be<br />
clarified <strong>and</strong> the submission of revised module<br />
proposal forms.<br />
Revised Module<br />
Proposals<br />
required.<br />
SBCS<br />
Dr Jonathan<br />
Grey<br />
Module Proposals<br />
Minute Module Details Action Progress / Comments Responsibility<br />
Module<br />
Organiser<br />
2010:035<br />
[November<br />
PMAB]<br />
Broadcasting<br />
Regulation<br />
The Programme Specification(s) for the<br />
programmes where Broadcasting Regulation<br />
would be offered should be updated to<br />
include it as a viable option module <strong>and</strong><br />
submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong>.<br />
Revised Programme<br />
Specifications required.<br />
SPIR<br />
Dr Julia<br />
Hörnle<br />
2010:078<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
Advanced<br />
Accounting for<br />
Business<br />
The module comprised a one hour lecture<br />
per week over 11 weeks (totalling 11 hours)<br />
<strong>and</strong> a one hour seminar per week (totalling<br />
10 hours). As such, the Board questioned<br />
why there would be one less seminar. This<br />
issue would require clarification by the<br />
School of Business <strong>and</strong> Management<br />
To be clarified.<br />
SBM<br />
Sean<br />
McCartney<br />
2010:079<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
Management<br />
Skills <strong>and</strong><br />
Development<br />
The module comprised a one hour lecture per<br />
week over 11 weeks (totalling 11 hours) <strong>and</strong><br />
a one hour seminar per week (totalling 10<br />
hours). As such, the Board questioned why<br />
there would be one less seminar. This would<br />
require clarification by the School of Business<br />
<strong>and</strong> Management.<br />
To be clarified.<br />
SBM<br />
Roger<br />
Johnston<br />
The JACS code was missing from the module<br />
proposal form <strong>and</strong> required clarification.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31-03-11<br />
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-108<br />
2010:081<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
The Return of the<br />
Renaissance in<br />
19 th Century<br />
Europe <strong>and</strong> The<br />
German<br />
Aphorism: a form<br />
of thought<br />
Modules for The Return of the Renaissance<br />
in 19 th Century Europe <strong>and</strong> The German<br />
Aphorism: a form of thought indicated<br />
September 2010 as the module start date.<br />
This information was understood to be<br />
incorrect <strong>and</strong> would be amended accordingly<br />
to September 2011.<br />
This has been corrected. SLLF Various<br />
2010:082<br />
[February<br />
PMAB]<br />
Modern Legal<br />
History<br />
The module would also be made available to<br />
associate students in Semester A <strong>and</strong><br />
Semester B. Consequently, the module<br />
proposal form would need to be amended to<br />
reflect this.<br />
Revised Module Proposal<br />
Form required.<br />
Law<br />
Andrew Le<br />
Sueur<br />
Module Withdrawals<br />
Minute Details Progress / Comments Responsibility<br />
Module<br />
Organiser
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Programme Proposals<br />
School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />
BSc Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology/ with Industrial<br />
Experience (Part 2 ) <strong>and</strong> the following 6 associated module<br />
proposals:<br />
Arts Application Programming<br />
Bridging Arts & Technology<br />
Creating Interactive Objects<br />
Creative Group Project<br />
Introduction to Digital Audio<br />
Sound Design<br />
BEng Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computing with Industrial<br />
Experience (Part 2)<br />
BEng Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Telecommunications with<br />
Industrial Experience (Part 2)<br />
BSc(Eng) Computing <strong>and</strong> ICT with Industrial Experience (Part<br />
2)<br />
BSc(Eng) Computing & ICT with Business Management with<br />
Industrial Experience (Part 2)<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
BSc (Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology with <strong>and</strong> without<br />
industrial experience<br />
The SEB is not indicated for two modules (Introduction to<br />
Digital Audio <strong>and</strong> Sound Design). This should be clarified.<br />
All the Programme Proposals require the signature of the<br />
Head of School.<br />
No other significant issues have been identified.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />
session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology<br />
Programme Code I150<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Proposed Start Date September 2012<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
School of Geography<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
N/A<br />
Programme Organiser Prof Andrea Cavallaro<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
This programme is intended to respond to a growing dem<strong>and</strong> in the industry for graduates with a high level of training in<br />
creative multimedia production, multimedia social networks, computer-driven animation, multimedia scripting, interactive<br />
multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. The<br />
programme aims to access a new population of better quality <strong>and</strong> better motivated undergraduate students by exploiting the<br />
unique competencies within EECS that shall be complemented by relevant courses from the Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Studies<br />
faculty. The programme is designed to respond to the dem<strong>and</strong> from the creative sector that requests for people who can<br />
combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills, as demonstrated from our experience with the industries linked with the MAT Doctoral
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Training Centre - http://www.mat.qmul.ac.uk/<br />
The Creative Industries form some 7% of the UK economy, similar in size to the financial services industry, with export of services<br />
of nearly £15bn in 2005 (DCMS, Creative Industries Economic Estimates Statistical Bulletin, October 2007). During 1997-2005 they<br />
grew by 6%, double the overall UK economic growth, making them important not just to the UK Digital Economy, but to the UK<br />
economy as a whole. Yet the Creative Industries are unlike almost every other industry, with a small number of large players<br />
complemented by a very large number of small businesses, micro-businesses, <strong>and</strong> individuals. Training students with the skills to<br />
maintain the UK’s position as a world leader in the Creative Industries will be a particularly important challenge - which the<br />
Doctoral Training Centre in Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology has already started addressing at graduate level. We want now to<br />
naturally complete our training provision with this undergraduate programme.<br />
Students will have access to QMUL's state-of-the art research <strong>and</strong> performance facilities including the Augmented Human<br />
Interaction Laboratory as well as extensive resources offered by industrial <strong>and</strong> public sector partners. In addition, students will<br />
also make use of the Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Studios including the Listening Room, Control Room <strong>and</strong> performance Laboratory as well as<br />
the full range of computing resources offered by the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science, including several<br />
clusters.<br />
2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
This programme covers fundamental aspects of the digital economy, creative multimedia production, computer-driven<br />
animation, multimedia scripting, interactive multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong><br />
management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. Graduates from this programme will effectively combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills.<br />
The programme aims to emphasise computer systems, digital installations <strong>and</strong> software with a special focus on new media<br />
creation; to provide a core knowledge of media production, multimedia system design; to focus on the increasingly important<br />
area of 3D graphics <strong>and</strong> computer-driven animation; to emphasise scripting <strong>and</strong> production aspects of media creation; to equip<br />
the students with the practical skills needed to modify <strong>and</strong> test a piece of software <strong>and</strong> hardware; to enable the students to<br />
develop the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, both in written <strong>and</strong> multimedia form,<br />
effectively.<br />
The career opportunities for the graduates from this programme are in the (interactive) media production, music <strong>and</strong> game<br />
industry, internet, communications <strong>and</strong> consumer industries. The blending of technical courses with business <strong>and</strong> arts courses<br />
will equip the graduates with the skills that are necessary to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> to contribute to the modern arts <strong>and</strong> media sectors<br />
of the digital economy. Opinions of relevant external key players are reported below:<br />
Steff Ungerer, Burst Tv <strong>and</strong> Newoperahero -- http://www.burst-tv.net/ -- http://www.newoperahero.com/ - “We wholeheartedly<br />
support any moves by <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University to create courses that are designed to teach students to work in new media<br />
industries. Seeing the graduates who approach our company straight out of university we realised that there is a need for a<br />
better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the professional application of their knowledge <strong>and</strong> an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how different disciplines can<br />
be connected to achieve better results. We are hopeful that these new courses at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> university will enable students to<br />
come closer to the requirements of their future workplace. We are happy to support any efforts in the direction.”<br />
Evelyn Wilson, Senior Manager LCACE (London Centre for Arts <strong>and</strong> Cultural Exchange) www.lcace.org.uk “Given the success of<br />
the recently established DTC, this proposal seems like a valuable <strong>and</strong> logical addition to QMUL's current offer. In this time of<br />
recession when public support is likely to significantly shrink in the coming years, a course such as this, that recognises the need<br />
for a plural approach to learning <strong>and</strong> that furthermore identifies that the 'creative industries' is not an entity fixed in scale, scope<br />
or nature seems like a very good addition to the department's offer. The proposed framework of encouraging students to work<br />
across the sciences, the arts, humanities AND social sciences will also surely chime positively in the near future where more<br />
joined up approaches to teaching <strong>and</strong> research resources may be not just encouraged but essential”<br />
Martyn Ware, Illustrious - http://www.illustriouscompany.co.uk/ - “I absolutely support the need for such a course, I think it's not<br />
only an excellent <strong>and</strong> logical next step but will create a virtuous circle <strong>and</strong> potential c<strong>and</strong>idates for the doctorate course. Of<br />
course the PHD students can pass on their knowledge also.”<br />
Richard Jacobs, BT - http://www.btplc.com/innovation/index.cfm - “Happy to support the proposal from a personal perspective. It<br />
looks comprehensive <strong>and</strong> relevant to the growing media industries.”
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Tim Jones, Executive Director, MOTIROTI - http://www.motiroti.com/ - “We would fully support this move to create what we're<br />
confident would be a popular course, <strong>and</strong> a positive step to respond to the huge potential of a growth area that is currently<br />
lacking sufficient programmes reflecting industry needs <strong>and</strong> innovation potential. As a natural addition to the existing phd<br />
programme, it will enhance both areas by further diversifying the options available.”<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
Audio/Video data capture <strong>and</strong> processing, <strong>and</strong> an appreciation of how these systems can be used creatively for audiovisual<br />
<strong>and</strong> computer-based content production<br />
Principles of operation, limitations, <strong>and</strong> potential <strong>and</strong> effective use of electronic media <strong>and</strong> their associated tools <strong>and</strong><br />
technologies<br />
Design, project <strong>and</strong> people management principles <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Analyse information <strong>and</strong> experiences, formulate independent judgements, <strong>and</strong> articulate reasoned arguments through<br />
reflection, review <strong>and</strong> evaluation<br />
Source, navigate, select, retrieve, evaluate, manipulate <strong>and</strong> manage information from a variety of sources<br />
Formulate reasoned responses to the critical judgements of others<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Design, plan, manage, implement, evaluate <strong>and</strong> report a significant individual project in electronic media design <strong>and</strong><br />
technology<br />
Make effective use of enabling computer technologies for post production <strong>and</strong> compositing<br />
Apply technical knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills in new situations<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
Work independently on a practical or research-based project under supervision
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Work effectively as part of a team, identifying tasks <strong>and</strong> roles, <strong>and</strong> managing time, resources <strong>and</strong> progress appropriately<br />
Analyse complex, novel <strong>and</strong> diverse situations, <strong>and</strong> identify appropriate methods of working <strong>and</strong> communicating<br />
4) Programme Structure<br />
The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />
pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />
modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />
The BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will be a single programme with three pathways as electives: creative production<br />
pathway, society <strong>and</strong> geopolitics pathway <strong>and</strong> advanced programming pathway. The programme includes a number of modules<br />
that bridge the gap between creative arts <strong>and</strong> technology to cater to the current industrial dem<strong>and</strong>. The BSc(Eng) Multimedia<br />
<strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will contain compulsory <strong>and</strong> elective modules as specified below.<br />
Six new modules are proposed:<br />
Arts Application Programming (level 4)<br />
Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (level 4)<br />
Introduction to Digital Audio (level 4)<br />
Creating Interactive Objects (level 5)<br />
Sound Design (level 5)<br />
Creative Group Project (level 5)<br />
The programme structure is as follows, all modules being worth 15 credits except where otherwise indicated:<br />
YEAR 1, SEMESTER 1: EECSx Arts Application Programming (new); EECSy Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (new); ELE105<br />
Introduction to Multimedia; DCS111 Computer Architecture<br />
YEAR 1, SEMESTER 2: ELE104 Professional Applications; ELE207 Website Design <strong>and</strong> Authoring Tools; DCS150 Fundamentals of<br />
Web Technology; EECSa Introduction to Digital Audio (new)<br />
YEAR 2, SEMESTER 1: EECSz Creating Interactive Objects (new); EECSw Creative Group Project (new); EECSb Sound Design (new);<br />
plus one of ELE161 Programming Fundamentals; FLM104 Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong><br />
Space (30 credits)<br />
YEAR 2, SEMESTER 2: DCS224 Graphical User Interfaces; ELE403 Internet Protocols; DCS237 Business Information Systems; plus<br />
one of DCS104 Object-Oriented Programming; FLM016 Production Skills; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong> Space contd (30 credits)<br />
YEAR 3, SEMESTER 1: ELE540 Emergent Multimedia Applications <strong>and</strong> Technology; ELE402 Enterprise Management; ELE521 BSc<br />
Project (30 credits); plus one of DCS339 C++ for Image Processing; FLM204 Directing Drama; FLM305 Creative Production (30<br />
credits); GEG6113 Urbanism, Culture <strong>and</strong> Modernity<br />
YEAR 3, SEMESTER 2: ELE606 Product Development; DCS318 Interaction Design; ELE521 BSc Project contd (30 credits); plus one of<br />
ELE405 3D Graphics Programming Tools; FLM205 Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> Original Script; FLM305 Creative Production<br />
contd (30 credits); GEG6116 The Geopolitics of Life<br />
Module Title<br />
Arts application programming<br />
Bridging arts <strong>and</strong> technology<br />
Introduction to Multimedia<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of Study<br />
Semester<br />
EECSx 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
EECSy 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
ELE105 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Computer architecture<br />
Professional applications<br />
Fundamentals of web technology<br />
Business information systems<br />
Introduction to digital audio<br />
Creating interactive objects<br />
Sound design<br />
Website design <strong>and</strong> authoring tools<br />
Graphical user interfaces<br />
Internet protocols<br />
Creative group project<br />
Emergent multimedia applications<br />
<strong>and</strong> technology<br />
Enterprise management<br />
Product development<br />
Interaction design<br />
BSc project<br />
DCS111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
DCS150 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
DCS237 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
EECSa 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
EECSz 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
EECSb 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
ELE207 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
DCS224 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
EECSw 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
ELE540 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 1<br />
ELE402 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 1<br />
ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 2<br />
DCS318 15 6 Compulsory 3 Semester 2<br />
ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> technique FLM104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />
Production skills<br />
Creative production<br />
Directing drama<br />
Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> original<br />
script<br />
FLM016 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />
FLM305 30 6 Elective 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
FLM204 15 5 Elective 3 Semester 1<br />
FLM205 15 5 Elective 3 Semester 2
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Society, culture <strong>and</strong> space<br />
Urbanism, culture <strong>and</strong> modernity<br />
The geopolitics of life<br />
Programming fundamentals<br />
Object-oriented programming<br />
C++ for image processing<br />
3D graphics programming tools<br />
GEG5110 30 5 Elective 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
GEG6113 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 1<br />
GEG6116 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />
ELE161 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />
DCS104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />
DCS339 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 1<br />
ELE405 15 5 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />
Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />
5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />
achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />
the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />
sources, including The Learning Institute<br />
The teaching, learning <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies will be tailored to the learning outcomes of the different modules. These will<br />
include lectures, practical <strong>and</strong> library-based research, presentations, group work <strong>and</strong> knowledge transfer activities. Lectures are<br />
used to introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Practical <strong>and</strong> library-based<br />
research allows students to develop skills in review, investigative methods <strong>and</strong> critical analysis. Presentations <strong>and</strong> group work<br />
enhance students' team-working <strong>and</strong> communication skills. Knowledge transfer activities increase students' awareness of the<br />
broader context of their discipline <strong>and</strong> supports them in translating their knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills to that broader<br />
context.<br />
Taught modules will be assessed through a combination of examinations (EXM), coursework (CWK), portfolio <strong>and</strong> performance<br />
(PRA), as appropriate for the content <strong>and</strong> focus of each individual module. Project modules (DIS) will be examined on the basis of<br />
a final written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the software / hardware / installation developed by the<br />
student.<br />
6) Programme Management<br />
Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />
Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />
College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />
in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />
4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />
falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Undergraduate Subject Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong><br />
approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for progression.<br />
Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />
established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />
informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />
discussing student feedback.<br />
No
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />
In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />
information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />
This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />
The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />
will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />
regular weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary between<br />
the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their (individual <strong>and</strong><br />
group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong> the students are<br />
acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all times) to students,<br />
where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong> also those available<br />
at the University level.<br />
9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />
Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />
To be advised on a case-by-case basis in conjunction with the Disability & Dyslexia Service.<br />
10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />
List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />
The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules (from EECS, Film <strong>and</strong> Geography) will be teaching in the<br />
programme. The rationalisation of the current EECS programmes following the curriculum review will free-up time of lecturers<br />
who, together with the academics who will fill the new approved EECS positions, will teach the new modules. Visiting Lecturers<br />
will be invited to complement the teaching provision for Creating Interactive Objects <strong>and</strong> to teach in Bridging Art <strong>and</strong><br />
Technology.<br />
11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />
If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />
Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />
should also be described in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />
Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />
that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
13) External Advisor Comments<br />
Comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external specialist<br />
opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in another<br />
institution. The external adviser should be able to comment on the appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the<br />
proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection criteria for <strong>and</strong> role of External<br />
Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
In addition to the opinions of relevant external key players from the industry reported above in box 2 we are providing as<br />
attachment to this document a letter by Prof. Atau Tanaka, Director of the Culture Lab at Newcastle University<br />
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/culturelab/people/profile/atau.tanaka<br />
Name & Title of External Advisor<br />
Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />
Address for Correspondence<br />
Atau Tanaka<br />
Professor <strong>and</strong> Director of the Culture Lab<br />
Culture Lab, Newcastle University, Gr<strong>and</strong> Assembly Rooms, King's Walk,<br />
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU<br />
Telephone Number 0191 246 4640 Email Address atau.tanaka@ncl.ac.uk<br />
The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />
Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? Yes<br />
> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />
regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />
session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology with Industrial Experience<br />
Programme Code I151<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Proposed Start Date September 2012<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
School of Geography<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
N/A<br />
Programme Organiser Prof Andrea Cavallaro<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
This programme is intended to respond to a growing dem<strong>and</strong> in the industry for graduates with a high level of training in<br />
creative multimedia production, multimedia social networks, computer-driven animation, multimedia scripting, interactive<br />
multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong> management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. The<br />
programme aims to access a new population of better quality <strong>and</strong> better motivated undergraduate students by exploiting the<br />
unique competencies within EECS that shall be complemented by relevant courses from the Humanities <strong>and</strong> Social Studies<br />
faculty. The programme is designed to respond to the dem<strong>and</strong> from the creative sector that requests for people who can<br />
combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills, as demonstrated from our experience with the industries linked with the MAT Doctoral
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Training Centre - http://www.mat.qmul.ac.uk/<br />
The Creative Industries form some 7% of the UK economy, similar in size to the financial services industry, with export of services<br />
of nearly £15bn in 2005 (DCMS, Creative Industries Economic Estimates Statistical Bulletin, October 2007). During 1997-2005 they<br />
grew by 6%, double the overall UK economic growth, making them important not just to the UK Digital Economy, but to the UK<br />
economy as a whole. Yet the Creative Industries are unlike almost every other industry, with a small number of large players<br />
complemented by a very large number of small businesses, micro-businesses, <strong>and</strong> individuals. Training students with the skills to<br />
maintain the UK’s position as a world leader in the Creative Industries will be a particularly important challenge - which the<br />
Doctoral Training Centre in Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology has already started addressing at graduate level. We want now to<br />
naturally complete our training provision with this undergraduate programme.<br />
Students will have access to QMUL's state-of-the art research <strong>and</strong> performance facilities including the Augmented Human<br />
Interaction Laboratory as well as extensive resources offered by industrial <strong>and</strong> public sector partners. In addition, students will<br />
also make use of the Media <strong>and</strong> Arts Studios including the Listening Room, Control Room <strong>and</strong> performance Laboratory as well as<br />
the full range of computing resources offered by the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science, including several<br />
clusters.<br />
The Industrial Placement Year will give students the opportunity to utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong><br />
theoretical knowledge already acquired through the programme of study. This will will have a direct positive impact on student<br />
employability <strong>and</strong> career development.<br />
2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
This programme covers fundamental aspects of the digital economy, creative multimedia production, computer-driven<br />
animation, multimedia scripting, interactive multimedia design, 3D graphics, web-based advertisement production, <strong>and</strong><br />
management <strong>and</strong> planning of media assets. Graduates from this programme will effectively combine technical <strong>and</strong> creative skills.<br />
The programme aims to emphasise computer systems, digital installations <strong>and</strong> software with a special focus on new media<br />
creation; to provide a core knowledge of media production, multimedia system design; to focus on the increasingly important<br />
area of 3D graphics <strong>and</strong> computer-driven animation; to emphasise scripting <strong>and</strong> production aspects of media creation; to equip<br />
the students with the practical skills needed to modify <strong>and</strong> test a piece of software <strong>and</strong> hardware; to enable the students to<br />
develop the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, both in written <strong>and</strong> multimedia form,<br />
effectively.<br />
The career opportunities for the graduates from this programme are in the (interactive) media production, music <strong>and</strong> game<br />
industry, internet, communications <strong>and</strong> consumer industries. The blending of technical courses with business <strong>and</strong> arts courses<br />
will equip the graduates with the skills that are necessary to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> to contribute to the modern arts <strong>and</strong> media sectors<br />
of the digital economy. Opinions of relevant external key players are reported below:<br />
Steff Ungerer, Burst Tv <strong>and</strong> Newoperahero -- http://www.burst-tv.net/ -- http://www.newoperahero.com/ - “We wholeheartedly<br />
support any moves by <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University to create courses that are designed to teach students to work in new media<br />
industries. Seeing the graduates who approach our company straight out of university we realised that there is a need for a<br />
better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the professional application of their knowledge <strong>and</strong> an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how different disciplines can<br />
be connected to achieve better results. We are hopeful that these new courses at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> university will enable students to<br />
come closer to the requirements of their future workplace. We are happy to support any efforts in the direction.”<br />
Evelyn Wilson, Senior Manager LCACE (London Centre for Arts <strong>and</strong> Cultural Exchange) www.lcace.org.uk “Given the success of<br />
the recently established DTC, this proposal seems like a valuable <strong>and</strong> logical addition to QMUL's current offer. In this time of<br />
recession when public support is likely to significantly shrink in the coming years, a course such as this, that recognises the need<br />
for a plural approach to learning <strong>and</strong> that furthermore identifies that the 'creative industries' is not an entity fixed in scale, scope<br />
or nature seems like a very good addition to the department's offer. The proposed framework of encouraging students to work<br />
across the sciences, the arts, humanities AND social sciences will also surely chime positively in the near future where more<br />
joined up approaches to teaching <strong>and</strong> research resources may be not just encouraged but essential”<br />
Martyn Ware, Illustrious - http://www.illustriouscompany.co.uk/ - “I absolutely support the need for such a course, I think it's not<br />
only an excellent <strong>and</strong> logical next step but will create a virtuous circle <strong>and</strong> potential c<strong>and</strong>idates for the doctorate course. Of
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
course the PHD students can pass on their knowledge also.”<br />
Richard Jacobs, BT - http://www.btplc.com/innovation/index.cfm - “Happy to support the proposal from a personal perspective. It<br />
looks comprehensive <strong>and</strong> relevant to the growing media industries.”<br />
Tim Jones, Executive Director, MOTIROTI - http://www.motiroti.com/ - “We would fully support this move to create what we're<br />
confident would be a popular course, <strong>and</strong> a positive step to respond to the huge potential of a growth area that is currently<br />
lacking sufficient programmes reflecting industry needs <strong>and</strong> innovation potential. As a natural addition to the existing phd<br />
programme, it will enhance both areas by further diversifying the options available.”<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
A4<br />
Audio/Video data capture <strong>and</strong> processing, <strong>and</strong> an appreciation of how these systems can be used creatively for audiovisual<br />
<strong>and</strong> computer-based content production<br />
Principles of operation, limitations, <strong>and</strong> potential <strong>and</strong> effective use of electronic media <strong>and</strong> their associated tools <strong>and</strong><br />
technologies<br />
Design, project <strong>and</strong> people management principles <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />
The student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
Analyse information <strong>and</strong> experiences, formulate independent judgements, <strong>and</strong> articulate reasoned arguments through<br />
reflection, review <strong>and</strong> evaluation<br />
Source, navigate, select, retrieve, evaluate, manipulate <strong>and</strong> manage information from a variety of sources<br />
Formulate reasoned responses to the critical judgements of others<br />
Reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Design, plan, manage, implement, evaluate <strong>and</strong> report a significant individual project in electronic media design <strong>and</strong><br />
technology<br />
Make effective use of enabling computer technologies for post production <strong>and</strong> compositing
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
Apply technical knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills in new situations<br />
Make a clear connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
Work independently on a practical or research-based project under supervision<br />
Work effectively as part of a team, identifying tasks <strong>and</strong> roles, <strong>and</strong> managing time, resources <strong>and</strong> progress appropriately<br />
Analyse complex, novel <strong>and</strong> diverse situations, <strong>and</strong> identify appropriate methods of working <strong>and</strong> communicating<br />
Identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)<br />
4) Programme Structure<br />
The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />
pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />
modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />
The BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will be a single programme with three pathways as electives: creative production<br />
pathway, society <strong>and</strong> geopolitics pathway <strong>and</strong> advanced programming pathway. The programme includes a number of modules<br />
that bridge the gap between creative arts <strong>and</strong> technology to cater to the current industrial dem<strong>and</strong>. The BSc(Eng) Multimedia<br />
<strong>and</strong> Arts Technology will contain compulsory <strong>and</strong> elective modules as specified below.<br />
Six new modules are proposed:<br />
Arts Application Programming (level 4)<br />
Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (level 4)<br />
Introduction to Digital Audio (level 4)<br />
Creating Interactive Objects (level 5)<br />
Sound Design (level 5)<br />
Creative Group Project (level 5)<br />
The programme structure is as follows, all modules being worth 15 credits except where otherwise indicated:<br />
YEAR 1, SEMESTER 1: EECSx Arts Application Programming (new); EECSy Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology (new); ELE105<br />
Introduction to Multimedia; DCS111 Computer Architecture<br />
YEAR 1, SEMESTER 2: ELE104 Professional Applications; ELE207 Website Design <strong>and</strong> Authoring Tools; DCS150 Fundamentals of<br />
Web Technology; EECSa Introduction to Digital Audio (new)<br />
YEAR 2, SEMESTER 1: EECSz Creating Interactive Objects (new); EECSw Creative Group Project (new); EECSb Sound Design (new);<br />
plus one of ELE161 Programming Fundamentals; FLM104 Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> Technique; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong><br />
Space (30 credits)<br />
YEAR 2, SEMESTER 2: DCS224 Graphical User Interfaces; ELE403 Internet Protocols; DCS237 Business Information Systems; plus<br />
one of DCS104 Object-Oriented Programming; FLM016 Production Skills; GEG5110 Society, Culture <strong>and</strong> Space contd (30 credits)<br />
YEAR 3 - DCS250 Industrial Placement Project<br />
YEAR 4, SEMESTER 1: ELE540 Emergent Multimedia Applications <strong>and</strong> Technology; ELE402 Enterprise Management; ELE521 BSc<br />
Project (30 credits); plus one of DCS339 C++ for Image Processing; FLM204 Directing Drama; FLM305 Creative Production (30<br />
credits); GEG6113 Urbanism, Culture <strong>and</strong> Modernity<br />
YEAR 4, SEMESTER 2: ELE606 Product Development; DCS318 Interaction Design; ELE521 BSc Project contd (30 credits); plus one of<br />
ELE405 3D Graphics Programming Tools; FLM205 Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> Original Script; FLM305 Creative Production<br />
contd (30 credits); GEG6116 The Geopolitics of Life
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />
Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />
equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />
Module Title<br />
Arts application programming<br />
Bridging arts <strong>and</strong> technology<br />
Introduction to Multimedia<br />
Computer architecture<br />
Professional applications<br />
Fundamentals of web technology<br />
Business information systems<br />
Introduction to digital audio<br />
Creating interactive objects<br />
Sound design<br />
Website design <strong>and</strong> authoring tools<br />
Graphical user interfaces<br />
Internet protocols<br />
Creative group project<br />
Industrial Placement Year<br />
Emergent multimedia applications<br />
<strong>and</strong> technology<br />
Enterprise management<br />
Product development<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of Study<br />
Semester<br />
EECSx 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
EECSy 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
ELE105 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
DCS111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
DCS150 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
DCS237 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
EECSa 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
EECSz 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
EECSb 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
ELE207 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
DCS224 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
EECSw 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />
ELE540 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
ELE402 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Interaction design<br />
BSc project<br />
DCS318 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Scriptwriting: Creativity <strong>and</strong> technique FLM104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />
Production skills<br />
Creative production<br />
Directing drama<br />
Scriptwriting: Adaptation <strong>and</strong> original<br />
script<br />
Society, culture <strong>and</strong> space<br />
Urbanism, culture <strong>and</strong> modernity<br />
The geopolitics of life<br />
Programming fundamentals<br />
Object-oriented programming<br />
C++ for image processing<br />
3D graphics programming tools<br />
FLM016 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />
FLM305 30 6 Elective 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
FLM204 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 1<br />
FLM205 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 2<br />
GEG5110 30 5 Elective 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
GEG6113 15 6 Elective 4 Semester 1<br />
GEG6116 15 6 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />
ELE161 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 1<br />
DCS104 15 4 Elective 2 Semester 2<br />
DCS339 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 1<br />
ELE405 15 5 Elective 4 Semester 2<br />
Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />
5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />
achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />
the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />
sources, including The Learning Institute<br />
The teaching, learning <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies will be tailored to the learning outcomes of the different modules. These will<br />
include lectures, practical <strong>and</strong> library-based research, presentations, group work <strong>and</strong> knowledge transfer activities. Lectures are<br />
used to introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Practical <strong>and</strong> library-based<br />
research allows students to develop skills in review, investigative methods <strong>and</strong> critical analysis. Presentations <strong>and</strong> group work<br />
enhance students' team-working <strong>and</strong> communication skills. Knowledge transfer activities increase students' awareness of the<br />
broader context of their discipline <strong>and</strong> supports them in translating their knowledge, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> skills to that broader<br />
context.<br />
Taught modules will be assessed through a combination of examinations (EXM), coursework (CWK), portfolio <strong>and</strong> performance<br />
(PRA), as appropriate for the content <strong>and</strong> focus of each individual module. Project modules (DIS) will be examined on the basis of<br />
a final written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the software / hardware / installation developed by the<br />
No
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
student. The Industrial Placement Year module is assessed through a combination of written report (60%), viva (5%), learning<br />
journal (5%) <strong>and</strong> employer evaluations (2 x 15%).<br />
6) Programme Management<br />
Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />
Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />
College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />
in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />
4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />
falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Undergraduate Subject Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong><br />
approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for progression.<br />
Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />
established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />
informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />
discussing student feedback.<br />
7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />
In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />
information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />
This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />
The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />
will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />
regular weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary between<br />
the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their (individual <strong>and</strong><br />
group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong> the students are<br />
acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all times) to students,<br />
where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong> also those available<br />
at the University level. The Industrial Placements Manager provides dedicated support, documentation, etc for students out on<br />
Industrial Placement during their third year.<br />
9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />
Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />
To be advised on a case-by-case basis in conjunction with the Disability & Dyslexia Service.<br />
10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />
List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />
The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules (from EECS, Film <strong>and</strong> Geography) will be teaching in the<br />
programme. The rationalisation of the current EECS programmes following the curriculum review will free-up time of lecturers<br />
who, together with the academics who will fill the new approved EECS positions, will teach the new modules. Visiting Lecturers<br />
will be invited to complement the teaching provision for Creating Interactive Objects <strong>and</strong> to teach in Bridging Art <strong>and</strong><br />
Technology.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />
If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />
Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />
should also be described in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />
Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />
that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
13) External Advisor Comments<br />
Comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external specialist<br />
opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in another<br />
institution. The external adviser should be able to comment on the appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the<br />
proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection criteria for <strong>and</strong> role of External<br />
Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
In addition to the opinions of relevant external key players from the industry reported above in box 2 we are providing as<br />
attachment to this document a letter by Prof. Atau Tanaka, Director of the Culture Lab at Newcastle University<br />
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/culturelab/people/profile/atau.tanaka<br />
Name & Title of External Advisor<br />
Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />
Address for Correspondence<br />
Atau Tanaka<br />
Professor <strong>and</strong> Director of the Culture Lab<br />
Culture Lab, Newcastle University, Gr<strong>and</strong> Assembly Rooms, King's Walk,<br />
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU<br />
Telephone Number 0191 246 4640 Email Address atau.tanaka@ncl.ac.uk<br />
The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />
Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? Yes
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? Yes<br />
> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />
regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Professor Andrea Cavallaro<br />
School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />
<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of London<br />
Professor Atau Tanaka, DMA<br />
Chair of Digital Media<br />
Director, Culture Lab<br />
Newcastle University<br />
Newcastle upon Tyne<br />
NE1 7RU United Kingdom<br />
http://www.ncl.ac.uk/culturelab/<br />
atau.tanaka@ncl.ac.uk<br />
+44-7896-306-994<br />
31 January 2011<br />
Culture Lab is an interdisciplinary research facility at Newcastle University at the<br />
intersection of art <strong>and</strong> science. Since it’s opening in 2006, Culture Lab has hosted<br />
cutting edge research in areas of interactive media, pervasive computing, funded by<br />
UK <strong>and</strong> EC research councils. We promote socially <strong>and</strong> economically compelling<br />
synergies with artists, creative industries, <strong>and</strong> cultural <strong>and</strong> scientific institutions. As<br />
Director, I bring an intellectual vision to the facility, <strong>and</strong> work directly with University<br />
senior management to develop Culture Lab as a leading vehicle for research,<br />
teaching, <strong>and</strong> engagement. As Chair of Digital Media, I occupy the first senior<br />
academic post at Newcastle University created to respond to the growing dem<strong>and</strong> to<br />
create post-graduate curricula bridging art <strong>and</strong> technology in a practice-based<br />
research context. In my own research, I am a researcher <strong>and</strong> practitioner in the area<br />
of new media <strong>and</strong> interactive music. I have helped to nurture the area of interactive<br />
media art <strong>and</strong> performance, helping to establish international conferences in the field<br />
such as the ACM Digital Library archived New Interfaces for Musical Expression<br />
(NIME).<br />
The new programme being proposed, BSc in Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology,<br />
responds, at an undergraduate level, to the same needs as we at Newcastle<br />
addressed in 2008 in creating a Master of Research in Digital Media. An area<br />
pioneered by the MIT Media Lab, <strong>and</strong> the New York University (NYU) Interactive<br />
Telecommunications Programme (ITP), <strong>and</strong> in the UK by the RCA’s Design<br />
Interactions programme, this hi-lights the development of the creative <strong>and</strong> cultural<br />
industries in the UK <strong>and</strong> indeed worldwide. The arrival of a digital society <strong>and</strong> the<br />
assimilation of interactive technologies in activities of everyday life have created the<br />
need for robust training, now at the undergraduate level, of students in technical<br />
disciplines as applied to culture <strong>and</strong> creativity.<br />
With the massive take up in all aspects of society of digital media, in culture, in<br />
entertainment, in information distribution, in communication, digital technologies have<br />
had a rapid <strong>and</strong> profound impact on human activity <strong>and</strong> social interaction. Whether it
e for the BBC delivering on their full digital switchover, the music industry entering a<br />
post-CD era, the take up of human-centric design in engineering industries, or the<br />
applications of social media <strong>and</strong> Web 2.0 to facilitate work <strong>and</strong> leisure activities, there<br />
is a clear dem<strong>and</strong> for qualified students to enter the work place. Students entering<br />
university today are digital natives who have grown up with the World Wide Web, do<br />
not see traditional disciplinary boundaries in the same way that traditional institutional<br />
silos are currently still organised, <strong>and</strong> will choose universities that will offer for them<br />
what is second nature.<br />
The proposed programme’s rationale <strong>and</strong> aims respond to this new l<strong>and</strong>scape in a<br />
robust <strong>and</strong> academically rigorous way. In responding to needs arising from the<br />
commercial sector, it is nonetheless crucial not to conceive of a purely vocational<br />
course of study. The inclusion of modules from humanities disciplines (from areas<br />
such as Drama where <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>’s excellence is recognised) demonstrates an<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the need to transmit to students a deeper view of the meaning of<br />
technological development in society. By drawing on the MAT Digital Economy<br />
Doctoral Training Centre, <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> builds on academic excellence <strong>and</strong> the<br />
success of integrating creative disciplines in a school of engineering.<br />
The new modules designed for the curriculum fit the format of similar offerings we<br />
have conceived at Newcastle <strong>and</strong> that are offered at a post-graduate level at<br />
Goldsmiths. The challenge of teaching computer programming in an applied, creative<br />
way is today a clear trend, <strong>and</strong> facilitated by the high level multimedia languages like<br />
Processing available today. To connect the algorithmic world to the real world through<br />
interactive objects is the area of Physical Computing pioneered at NYU <strong>and</strong> that is<br />
today broadly practiced on the Arduino platform. The group project module hi-lights<br />
the practice-based nature of all this work, <strong>and</strong> teach students not just real world<br />
applications, but the need to conceive <strong>and</strong> design realisable, feasible projects, <strong>and</strong><br />
teach project management skills. Finally, the Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology module<br />
addresses the fundamental theoretical debate at the heart of this area of study, <strong>and</strong><br />
of this thrust in contemporary societal change, the increasing integration of the<br />
technological <strong>and</strong> the cultural.<br />
The appropriateness of the new programme is therefore clear. The reputation <strong>and</strong><br />
track record of EECS <strong>and</strong> their stature in this area, with the Centre for Digital Music<br />
<strong>and</strong> the MAT DTC attest to the viability <strong>and</strong> intellectual rigour of the new programme.<br />
Faithfully,
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Arts Application Programming<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2012<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
G620 Programming<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2012/13 10 6 20<br />
2013/14 15 6 25<br />
2014/15 20 6 30
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The rationale is to provide a programming module that focuses on the applications that can be created, rather than on gradually<br />
building up a detailed knowledge of programming. Students will be encouraged to build <strong>and</strong> decompose applications using<br />
processing (visual applications) <strong>and</strong> Java (music API). The rationale is that the structures <strong>and</strong> notation can be explained in the<br />
context of each application, thus getting students to focus on how programming can be used to generate creative applications.<br />
It is a compulsory module on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology [needed prior to the 2nd year 'creative group project'<br />
module].<br />
This module could also be offered to students from non-technical departments who want to underst<strong>and</strong> how to create artsbased<br />
applications. No prior programming experience needed. Prerequisite modules: none.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Open source software <strong>and</strong> development environments<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Arts Application Programming<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Karen Shoop<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module will introduce programming to students through designing <strong>and</strong> building arts applications. Students will learn to<br />
build graphics-based applications using Processing <strong>and</strong> audio applications using Java. By focussing on the range of applications<br />
that can be built, students will learn programming skills. The focus on this module is as much on the creativity of ideas as on how<br />
to write code to realise these ideas.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aim of this module is to focus on what computer programmes can do - i.e. the applications that can be developed - <strong>and</strong> use<br />
this to extract key structures <strong>and</strong> features of the chosen programming language (Java). This will encourage an exploratory<br />
approach as students see how modifying arts applications results in different outputs. Programmes will be built using a topdown<br />
approach, with a focus on what the application needs or should do, rather than by gradually developing programming<br />
skills. The aim is by stressing creativity of development students will become aware of what underpins the applications. Students<br />
will be encouraged to develop their own ideas for projects, being judged on an imaginative approach as much as on their correct<br />
coding.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
Core computer programming (Java)<br />
Complexity of program design<br />
A range of Application Programming Interfaces that aid creative development<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Apply programming skills to address a given problem<br />
Critically evaluate <strong>and</strong> test: analyse the extent to which a computer programme meets the criteria defined for its current use<br />
(<strong>and</strong> future development)<br />
Engage in computational thinking including its relevance to creative practice<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Specify, design <strong>and</strong> construct computer programmes (in Java)<br />
Translate a creative idea into a set of patterns<br />
Apply st<strong>and</strong>ard techniques to solve problems (debugging)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Translate creative ideas into precise ordered development steps<br />
Develop project proposals <strong>and</strong> specifications<br />
Work autonomously on a given problem or scenario<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
- Head First Java (2nd edition), Kathy Sierra <strong>and</strong> Bert Bates, O'Reilly, ISBN 0-596-00920-8<br />
- Processing: A Programming H<strong>and</strong>book for Visual Designers <strong>and</strong> Artists - Casey Reas, Ben Fry, <strong>and</strong> John Maeda, MIT Press<br />
- Processing: Creative Coding <strong>and</strong> Computational Art - Ira Greenberg<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
lectures: 22 hours<br />
tutorials: 8 hours<br />
programming labs: 20 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
100 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Coding Project Coursework 5 weeks 30 No 30%<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
Examination Examination 2.5 hours 70 Yes 30%<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 2.5 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2012<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />
G490 Computing Science not elsewhere classified<br />
W990 Creative Arts <strong>and</strong> Design not elsewhere classified<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2012/13 10 6 20<br />
2013/14 15 6 25<br />
2014/15 20 6 30
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module has three key aims: to encourage students to think creatively <strong>and</strong> use this to explore ideas of systems; to contrast<br />
how narrative <strong>and</strong> artworks discuss <strong>and</strong> use communication technologies <strong>and</strong> what these technologies actually do; to develop<br />
student writing skills. This module focuses on an engagement with artistic methods that can be used to inform <strong>and</strong> develop<br />
computing technologies. Students will be encouraged to use drawing, construction <strong>and</strong> performance to explore technologies<br />
<strong>and</strong> to express their ideas for potential communication applications. Students will also explore various narratives of technology<br />
as an introduction to what culture promises about technology. This will be compared <strong>and</strong> contrasted to what technology actually<br />
does <strong>and</strong> how it works with an introduction to algorithms, data structures <strong>and</strong> communication protocols. These discussions will<br />
be developed in student writings, both to explore creative narratives <strong>and</strong> to develop critical writing skills.<br />
This module will be compulsory on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology (MAT) programme <strong>and</strong> can be offered to<br />
students from non-technical departments. No prior programming experience needed. Prerequisite modules: none.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Interactive screens (<strong>and</strong> related software), ideally interactive tables. Ideally this<br />
module would have all these in a 'fabrication lab' that would also allow students<br />
to explore that ideas through basic construction<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Karen Shoop<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module investigates the relevance of creativity to computers <strong>and</strong> their applications. Students will develop ideas through a<br />
range of artistic practices to see how creativity informs technological development. Student writing will be developed through<br />
exploring narratives of technology, such as science fiction, using this as a springboard to underst<strong>and</strong> the protocols <strong>and</strong><br />
algorithms that underpin the technologies used in the digital world.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aim of this module is to remove the perceived barrier between technology <strong>and</strong> creativity. Students will be encouraged to<br />
explore how visual (e.g. drawing), performance <strong>and</strong> narrative skills can inform <strong>and</strong> enhance the creation of technologies.<br />
Students will use a range of art practice to break down assumptions of what technology should do <strong>and</strong> look like. Core writing<br />
skills (creative <strong>and</strong> essay skills) will also be developed through investigating narratives of technology, e.g. science fiction, <strong>and</strong><br />
contrasting this with factors, such as protocols <strong>and</strong> algorithms, that underpin the technologies we use. The aim is to enable<br />
students to be as confident drawing their ideas as discussing flows of information in protocols, or the appropriate data structures<br />
to store their data.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
Art practice as systems<br />
Computer protocols<br />
Importance of algorithms <strong>and</strong> data structures<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Apply given tools/methods accurately <strong>and</strong> carefully to a well defined problem <strong>and</strong> appreciate the complexity of the related<br />
issues.<br />
Reflect <strong>and</strong> communicate: present succinctly (orally, electronically or in writing) rational <strong>and</strong> reasoned arguments that<br />
address a given information h<strong>and</strong>ling problem or opportunity, including assessment of the impact of new technologies.<br />
Computational thinking including its relevance to everyday life.<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Use creative skills to structure applications <strong>and</strong> communicate intention<br />
Evaluate systems in terms of general quality attributes <strong>and</strong> possible trade-offs presented within the given problem.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
C 3<br />
Deploy effectively a range of tools used for the construction <strong>and</strong> documentation of computer applications<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Explore a more reflective attitude towards methods of learning<br />
Manage one's own learning <strong>and</strong> development including time management <strong>and</strong> organisational skills<br />
Numeracy <strong>and</strong> literacy in both underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> presenting cases involving a quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative dimension<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
- "Science Fiction", Roger Luckhurst<br />
- "Information is Beautiful", David McC<strong>and</strong>less<br />
- "Protocol: how control exists after decentralization", Alex<strong>and</strong>er R. Galloway<br />
- Leonardo (Journal of the International Society for the Arts, Sciences <strong>and</strong> Technology, ISAST)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
22 hours lectures<br />
8 hours tutorials<br />
10 hours practical sessions<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
110 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
creative assignment Practical 5 weeks 50% No 30% on C/W<br />
algorithms/protocols (probably<br />
class test)<br />
technology writing project<br />
(development of writing skills)<br />
Coursework 2 hours 20% No 30% on C/W<br />
Coursework 5 weeks 30% Yes 30%<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 2.5 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Creating Interactive Objects<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2013<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />
H600 Electronic <strong>and</strong> Electrical Engineering<br />
G400 Computer Science<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2013/14 10 6 20<br />
2014/15 15 6 25<br />
2015/16 20 6 30
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The module provides students with skills to design <strong>and</strong> develop interactive objects which form a core part of the Multimedia <strong>and</strong><br />
Arts Technology skillset. It will be a compulsory module on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology programme.<br />
This module could also be offered to students from non-technical departments of QMUL, subject to completion of the<br />
appropriate prerequisite module (‘Arts Application Programming’).<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Teaching room with computers for students <strong>and</strong> data projector <strong>and</strong> whiteboard<br />
facilities for lecturer. Two Arduino development kits per student, with a selection<br />
of small electronic items such as resistors, motors, sensors, LEDs, prototyping<br />
breadboards, <strong>and</strong> so on, as would be found in an undergraduate Electronics<br />
laboratory. Access to suitable equipment such as soldering irons, solder, wire,<br />
<strong>and</strong> prototyping materials such as wood, plastic, screws, glue, nails, hammers,<br />
etc. <strong>and</strong> suitable safety equipment such as goggles <strong>and</strong> gloves.<br />
Also required are a selection of more advanced components for Arduino<br />
including external LCD <strong>and</strong> LED displays, stepper motors, microphones,<br />
speakers, InfraRed LEDs, Ethernet cards, Bluetooth cards, Wifi cards.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Creating Interactive Objects<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr. N. Bryan-Kinns<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
Arts Application Programming<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
Interactive objects are physical devices controlled by microcontrollers using simple sensors <strong>and</strong> actuators. The module provides<br />
students with skills, knowledge, <strong>and</strong> experience of designing <strong>and</strong> prototyping interactive physical objects using contemporary<br />
microcontrollers. The module covers basic electronics, control circuits, sensors (analogue <strong>and</strong> digital), output (analogue <strong>and</strong><br />
digital), microcontrollers, simple networking, <strong>and</strong> microcontroller programming using the popular Arduino open-source<br />
platform. It additionally touches on topics of interaction design <strong>and</strong> evaluation to provide a framework in which students can
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
prototype <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> interactive objects.<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
Interactive objects are increasingly appearing in computing <strong>and</strong> interactive art domains including tangible computing <strong>and</strong><br />
embedded objects. Underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the underlying principles <strong>and</strong> design of the interactive artefacts will st<strong>and</strong> students in good<br />
stead for producing innovative <strong>and</strong> engaging pieces of interactive physical objects. After successfully completing the module<br />
students will be able to create interactive physical objects that use sensors <strong>and</strong> actuators to interact with the real world<br />
autonomously or networked with other devices <strong>and</strong> controllers.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
Basic electronics including dc, resistors, diodes, parallel <strong>and</strong> serial circuit configurations.<br />
Programming micro-controllers, specifically using the Arduino platform.<br />
Using sensors in Interactive Objects<br />
Design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of Interactive Objects in terms of enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement frameworks<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Apply models of enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement to the design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of Interactive Objects.<br />
Design <strong>and</strong> build simple interactive microcontroller software using a variety of input <strong>and</strong> output.<br />
Translate technologies into applicable creative media
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Physically prototype Interactive Objects. This may include building small objects from wood, plastic, etc. using glue,<br />
screws, etc. <strong>and</strong> may include transferable skills such as soldering.<br />
Solve problems analytically <strong>and</strong> creatively<br />
Report <strong>and</strong> present results in an intuitive <strong>and</strong> concise form<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Critique <strong>and</strong> reflect upon design decisions using frameworks for underst<strong>and</strong>ing enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement<br />
Prepare for <strong>and</strong> deliver oral <strong>and</strong> visual presentations<br />
Assess individual stress management <strong>and</strong> time management<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
- Massimo Banzi, Getting Started with Arduino, O'Reilly Media / Make<br />
- Tom Igoe, Making Things Talk: Practical Methods for Connecting Physical Objects, O'Reilly Media / Make, 2007
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
The module is delivered as a combination of lectures <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s-on<br />
lab session. Lab work is essential.<br />
Lectures: 2 hours per week<br />
Lab: 4 hours per week<br />
= 72 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
6.5 hours per week<br />
= 78 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Interactive Object Design <strong>and</strong><br />
Evaluation<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Coursework 2 weeks 10 30%<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
Interactive Object Build Coursework 6 weeks 50 30%<br />
Theories of design <strong>and</strong> evaluation Examination St<strong>and</strong>ard exam 40 Yes 30%<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Creative group project<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type DPM Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2013<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />
G920 Others in Computing Sciences<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
n/a<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
n/a<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2014/15 10 6 20<br />
2015/16 15 6 25<br />
2016/17 20 6 30
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module intends to provide students with h<strong>and</strong>s-on knowledge <strong>and</strong> experience to work as successful modern digital<br />
multimedia engineers. Students will apply knowledge gained in prior modules to produce a system that can be used creatively<br />
for audio-visual <strong>and</strong> computer-based content production or interactive installations, objects or tools.<br />
The module will help prepare students with knowledge of audio <strong>and</strong> video factors for the multimedia industries, ranging from<br />
interactive web design <strong>and</strong> gaming to audio <strong>and</strong> video production. The achievements in the project will form an important part<br />
in the portfolio of the students. In addition students will gain experience in team working, time management <strong>and</strong> project<br />
development. The module will give students the chance to demonstrate what they have learned in the taught part of<br />
programme in order to produce original work.<br />
The module will be compulsory on the BSc(Eng) Multimedia Arts Technology (MAT) undergraduate degree <strong>and</strong> can be offered to<br />
students from non-technical departments, subject to completion of the appropriate prerequisite module (‘Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong><br />
Technology’).<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Students will make use of existing research <strong>and</strong> performance facilities within<br />
EECS. This includes the listening room <strong>and</strong> the augmented human interaction<br />
laboratory . Hardware prototyping platforms (such as for example Arduino) <strong>and</strong><br />
the electronics laboratory will be used in projects involving creation of<br />
interactive objects.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Creative group project<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Prof Andrea Cavallaro<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
Bridging Arts <strong>and</strong> Technology<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
The module will be practice-based where students work in a team to produce a creative system for audio-visual content<br />
production or interactivity. Students will work in a team to identify the elements in a product development cycle; develop an<br />
audio, video, multimedia product with particular attention to its aesthetics, usability <strong>and</strong> marketability; analyse <strong>and</strong> present<br />
results in qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative measures; report <strong>and</strong> present findings in a clear <strong>and</strong> coherent manner.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The principal aims of the module are<br />
- To apply creativity in product development<br />
- To equip students with a detailed underst<strong>and</strong>ing of a product development cycle<br />
- To provide students with the experience of critically <strong>and</strong> artistically creating <strong>and</strong> examining multimedia content<br />
- To equip students with the necessary practical skills for conducting a major project<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
Creative design for audiovisual content development<br />
Tools available for content production<br />
Translating multimedia technologies into applicable creative media<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Critically assess a wide range of media<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> apply the principles underlying team working <strong>and</strong> group problem solving tasks<br />
Design, analyse <strong>and</strong> evaluate alternative solutions to novel problems<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
Prepare for <strong>and</strong> deliver oral <strong>and</strong> visual presentations
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Assess individual stress management <strong>and</strong> time management skills<br />
Report <strong>and</strong> present results in an intuitive <strong>and</strong> concise form<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Solve problems analytically <strong>and</strong> creatively<br />
Manage conflict <strong>and</strong> negotiation within a team<br />
Make oral <strong>and</strong> written presentations<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
- P. Trott, Innovation Management <strong>and</strong> New Product Development, 2008, Prentice Hall<br />
- S. Rogerson, Project Skills H<strong>and</strong>book, 1998, Chartwell-Bratt<br />
- T De Marco The Deadline: A Novel About Project Management, 1997, Dorset House
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
The module will be largely practical involving team work with<br />
regular meetings with the assigned supervisor<br />
Meeting with supervisor: 2 hours per week<br />
= 24 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Group meetings (involving planning, discussion<br />
<strong>and</strong> integration): 3 hours per week<br />
Working individually or with the team: 7.5 hours per week<br />
= 126 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Mid-project review Coursework 3,000 words 30 No 30%<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
Final project assessment Dissertation 10,000 words 70 Yes 30%<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Final project assessment Dissertation 10,000 words<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Introduction to Digital Audio<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />
H341 Acoustics<br />
H610 Electronic Engineering<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
None<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 5 20<br />
2012/13 15 5 25<br />
2013/14 20 8 35
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The module provides students with the theoretical knowledge to underst<strong>and</strong> the principles <strong>and</strong> concepts of digital audio, <strong>and</strong><br />
the practical skills to analyse <strong>and</strong> create digital audio themselves. It will exp<strong>and</strong> the existing suite of multimedia modules within<br />
the School, providing greater choice for the students, <strong>and</strong> offer tailored <strong>and</strong> better preparation for existing audio-related<br />
modules at levels 6 <strong>and</strong> 7.<br />
The module will be compulsory in the BEng Audio Systems Engineering <strong>and</strong> MEng Digital Audio <strong>and</strong> Music Systems Engineering,<br />
<strong>and</strong> an optional module in the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Teaching room with data projector, whiteboard facilities <strong>and</strong> stereo audio<br />
playback. Laboratory facilities with computers <strong>and</strong> headphones. Portable audio<br />
recorders. Access to C4DM's studio facilities.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Introduction to Digital Audio<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr. Josh Reiss<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This course covers the entire field of digital audio, including some depth in the subfields <strong>and</strong> related subjects. It is concerned with<br />
the creation, representation, modification <strong>and</strong> evaluation of digital audio. It introduces the basics of sound, <strong>and</strong> the key concepts<br />
of acoustics that are required to underst<strong>and</strong> how sound is created, represented, transmitted <strong>and</strong> perceived. The important<br />
characteristics of sound are described, such as the intensity, frequency, pitch <strong>and</strong> timbre. It gives students the knowledge to<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> how sound may be accurately represented digitally. Different representations, such as wav, midi <strong>and</strong> mp3 are<br />
introduced. The students are also taught critical listening skills, including the ability to properly create, record <strong>and</strong> discern<br />
sounds, identify subtle problems, identify frequencies, <strong>and</strong> hear hidden distortions.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
An underst<strong>and</strong>ing of digital audio is essential for anyone pursuing music technology or audio engineering, <strong>and</strong> is a highly useful<br />
skill for anyone studying multimedia.<br />
This module aims to provide students with;<br />
- knowledge of the fundamentals of acoustics <strong>and</strong> sound<br />
- underst<strong>and</strong>ing of digital audio <strong>and</strong> its representations<br />
- the ability to create <strong>and</strong> edit audio<br />
- critical listening skills<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
Digital representations of sound<br />
Critical listening skills<br />
Audio formats <strong>and</strong> their usage<br />
Software <strong>and</strong> hardware tools for creating <strong>and</strong> manipulating audio<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Listen critically to audio <strong>and</strong> identify possible problem issues<br />
Evaluate the quality of multimedia resources<br />
Transfer <strong>and</strong> apply knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing gained in other media to an audio context<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Critique <strong>and</strong> reflect upon alternative design choices<br />
Translate creative ideas into precise ordered development steps
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
C 3<br />
Demonstrate numeracy <strong>and</strong> literacy skills in underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> presenting quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative data <strong>and</strong><br />
explanations appropriately<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Make principled design decisions using frameworks for underst<strong>and</strong>ing enticement <strong>and</strong> engagement<br />
Record, edit <strong>and</strong> playback audio using st<strong>and</strong>ard hardware <strong>and</strong> software tools<br />
Create <strong>and</strong> manipulate multimedia objects<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Howard <strong>and</strong> Angus, Acoustics <strong>and</strong> Psychoacoustics<br />
Everest, Critical Listening Skills for Audio Professionals<br />
Ken C Pohlmann, Principles of Digital Audio
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
The module is delivered as a combination of lectures <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s-on<br />
lab session. Lab work is essenial.<br />
Lectures: 3 hours per week<br />
Lab: 3 hours per week<br />
= 72 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
6.5 hours per week<br />
= 78 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
MCQ Coursework 2 hours 15 No 30% on C/W<br />
Lab assignments/field work Practical 6 weeks 25 No 30% on C/W<br />
Final exam Examination 2.5 hours 60 Yes 30%<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Sound Design<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
G450 Multi-media Computing Science<br />
H341 Acoustics<br />
H610 Electronic Engineering<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
None<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 5 20<br />
2012/13 15 5 25<br />
2013/14 20 8 35
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Synthesis, DSP <strong>and</strong> software development are increasingly required in the discipline of Sound Design, a part of film, radio,<br />
television, theatre <strong>and</strong> computer game development. St<strong>and</strong> alone, embedded or mobile audio applications are increasingly<br />
popular. Within film production the role of "technical sound designer" <strong>and</strong> within games development the role of "Audio<br />
programmer/implementor" has been identified. Dem<strong>and</strong> continues to grow. The art <strong>and</strong> science of "sound design" intersects, to<br />
some degree, with subjects in the JACS codes listed below.<br />
G440 Human-computer Interaction<br />
G150 Mathematical Modelling<br />
G330 Stochastic Processes<br />
G610 Software Design<br />
H674 Virtual Reality Engineering<br />
W613 Film & Sound Recording<br />
W614 Visual <strong>and</strong> Audio Effects<br />
W280 Interactive <strong>and</strong> Electronic Design<br />
W212 Multimedia Design<br />
W430 Producing for Theatre<br />
F380 Acoustics (in architectural context) K120 Interior Architecture<br />
H341 Acoustics (in engineering context)<br />
H342 Vibration<br />
F321 Solid state Physics<br />
C850 Cognitive Psychology<br />
G710 Speech <strong>and</strong> Natural Language Processing<br />
H713 Production Processes<br />
N562 Corporate Image (br<strong>and</strong>ing)<br />
P132 Archive studies<br />
P300 Media studies<br />
Q131 Phonetics<br />
Q130 Phonetics <strong>and</strong> Phonology<br />
B110 Anatomy<br />
W810 Scriptwriting<br />
This module is aimed at those who wish to gain a basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of sound synthesis, signal processing as it relates to sound<br />
design. Those seeking supporting knowledge for software design of DAW, plugins, sequencers, <strong>and</strong> sound analysis applications<br />
would also be served.<br />
It will be compulsory on the BEng Audio Systems Engineering <strong>and</strong> the BSc(Eng) Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology. It could also be<br />
an optional <strong>and</strong> widely available interdisciplinary module for others outside the school.<br />
Resource Requirements
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
A quiet teaching room with data projector, whiteboard facilities <strong>and</strong> good<br />
quality stereo audio playback with small mixer at teachers desk. Adequate<br />
internet access with unencumbered internal networking at an adequate<br />
b<strong>and</strong>width for network audio work. A webspace with CGI run permissions for<br />
instructors to put coursework, examples <strong>and</strong> interactive materials.<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Students to maintain laptops with:<br />
Pure Data<br />
Csound<br />
CCRMA-SND or Spear analysis programs<br />
gcc/g++ compiler <strong>and</strong> audio libraries<br />
Audacity sound editor<br />
Lecture room to have adequate power outlets for student laptops while<br />
meeting safety requirements (eg not all in one place with trailing cables).<br />
Laboratory facilities with computers, audio editing <strong>and</strong> sequencing<br />
software, <strong>and</strong> headphones. Portable audio recorders. Access to C4DM's studio<br />
facilities.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Sound Design<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr. Josh Reiss<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None (there will be recommended<br />
modules including Basic Physics,<br />
Maths to pre calculus, at least 1 year<br />
programming experience, but none<br />
required)<br />
None<br />
None, although this would be<br />
excellent to study alongside<br />
Computer Game development,<br />
Audio production for film, radio or<br />
TV<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module covers fundamental technical <strong>and</strong> creative aspects of sound production, for both st<strong>and</strong>alone audio projects <strong>and</strong><br />
audio for film, games or music. It introduces topics such as skills in sound design; fundamental technical <strong>and</strong> creative aspects of<br />
sound production; fundamentals of computer audio; aesthetic <strong>and</strong> interpretive subjects; <strong>and</strong> the natural basis of sound.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
To learn basic sound design for film, theatre, games <strong>and</strong> music.<br />
To underst<strong>and</strong> the main tools <strong>and</strong> technologies in sound design <strong>and</strong> production.<br />
To introduce the basic principles of sound synthesis.<br />
To develop concepts in sound design.<br />
To introduce the potential for sound design through software programming environments.<br />
On completion of the module, students should be able to:<br />
1. Demonstrate an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of sound <strong>and</strong> music composition <strong>and</strong> editing, including a practical <strong>and</strong> theoretical<br />
approach.<br />
2. Apply underst<strong>and</strong>ing of simple sound synthesis.<br />
3. Underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> use sequencers, mixers, digital audio workstations, mixing consoles <strong>and</strong> other forms of audio editors.<br />
4. Use programming methods to build sound objects <strong>and</strong> sound scenes in a digital audio workstation environment.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
Basic Sound Design<br />
Electronic music<br />
Synthesisers <strong>and</strong> samplers<br />
Software <strong>and</strong> hardware tools for sound design<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Critique <strong>and</strong> analyse composed sound<br />
Evaluate alternative design decisions using formal frameworks<br />
Analyse, compare <strong>and</strong> contrast the nature <strong>and</strong> quality of diverse multimedia resources<br />
Transferable skills - able to:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Use fundamental knowledge to investigate new <strong>and</strong> emerging technologies<br />
Translate creative ideas into precise ordered development steps<br />
Demonstrate numeracy <strong>and</strong> literacy skills in underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> presenting quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative data <strong>and</strong><br />
explanations appropriately<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Create <strong>and</strong> manipulate multimedia objects<br />
Create original sound content<br />
Manipulate multichannel audio<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Designing Sound, Andy Farnell, MIT Press<br />
Sound for Picture: An Inside Look at Audio Producction for Film <strong>and</strong> Television. eds. Jeff Forlenza <strong>and</strong> Terri Stone. Hal Leonard<br />
Publishing Corporation, 1993.<br />
Sound Theory, Sound Practice: Ed. Rick Altman, AFI FIlm Readers/ Routledge, NY. 1992<br />
Sound Design: The Expressive Power of Music, Voice <strong>and</strong> Sound Effects in Cinema. David Sonnenschein., Michael Weise<br />
Productions, 2001
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
The module is delivered as a combination of lectures <strong>and</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s-on<br />
lab session. Lab work is essential.<br />
Lectures: 3 hours per week<br />
Lab: 3 hours per week<br />
= 72 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
6.5 hours per week<br />
= 78 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
Fieldwork (submitted project) Practical 2 weeks 25 No 30% on C/W<br />
Lab assignments Coursework 6 weeks 25 No 30% on C/W<br />
Examination Examination 2.5 hours 50 Yes 30%<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 110<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />
session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title Electronic Engineering & Computing with Industrial<br />
Experience<br />
Programme Code IH16<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Engineering (BEng) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
The proposed programme develops the existing programme BEng Electronic Engineering & Computing by adding an Industrial<br />
Experience year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give students the opportunity to<br />
utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired through the programme of<br />
study. This will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
The Electronic Engineering accredited degrees form a group of programmes with the same broad aims <strong>and</strong> objectives; the<br />
difference being that they address different technical flavours of the broad spectrum of the subject area.<br />
Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives are, therefore, common across the family, but the instantiation of these objectives may make use<br />
of different technical aspects within the family.<br />
Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives describe the differences between the programmes <strong>and</strong> Level-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />
between the BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng degrees.<br />
Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />
At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following abilities:<br />
• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations;<br />
• the ability to apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation;<br />
• the ability to use Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering;<br />
• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software);<br />
• the ability to recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong><br />
software ‘tools’ relevant to that particular issue;<br />
• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />
• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />
• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are made in industry;<br />
• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in society;<br />
<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />
• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong><br />
high-level languages;<br />
• the practical skills needed to implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment;<br />
• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a hardware or software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to<br />
identify faults;<br />
• the design skills needed to synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the<br />
best option from a range of<br />
alternatives), to implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original specification;<br />
• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in particular written information, effectively;<br />
• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic.<br />
Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />
• To emphasise computer systems <strong>and</strong> software;<br />
• To focus in particular on the increasingly important area of artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing.<br />
An industrial placement during the programme supports student learning about the application of Electronic Engineering &<br />
Computing in an organisational context. The aims of the placement year are to:<br />
• Ground the taught components of the programme in practical experience at a scale not possible within the College<br />
• Improve career preparation, giving students a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of future career options, improving their career prospects.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />
practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />
artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing<br />
the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />
the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />
relevant to that particular issue<br />
reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />
synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />
range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />
reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />
apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />
apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />
make a clearer connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages<br />
communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />
identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
4) Programme Structure<br />
The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />
pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />
modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />
Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />
Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />
The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />
Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />
equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />
X<br />
Module Title<br />
Telecommunications & Internet<br />
Fundamentals<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Semester<br />
ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Introduction to Electronic Systems ELE102 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Engineering Mathematics MAE111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Fundamentals of Web Technology ELE205 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Digital Circuit Design ELE202 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Software Engineering ELE304 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Digital Systems Design ELE335 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Signals & Systems Theory ELE374 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Internet Applications ELE404 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
X Microprocessor Systems Design ELE465 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />
X BEng Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X Digital Signal Processing ELE502 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Software Tools for Engineers ELE595 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Enterprise Management ELE402 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Artificial Intelligence ELE611 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X Product Development ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X Multimedia Systems ELE006 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />
5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />
achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />
the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />
sources, including The Learning Institute<br />
Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />
introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />
develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />
<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />
students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />
The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />
project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />
hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />
skills.<br />
The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />
evaluation forms (30%).<br />
No
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
6) Programme Management<br />
Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />
Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />
College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />
in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />
4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />
falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />
progression.<br />
Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />
established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />
informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />
discussing student feedback.<br />
7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />
In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />
information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />
None<br />
8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />
This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />
The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />
will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />
regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />
between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />
(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />
the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />
times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />
also those available at the University level.<br />
During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />
monitors the placement.<br />
9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />
Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />
None<br />
10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />
List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />
The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />
If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />
Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />
should also be described in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />
Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />
that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
13) External Advisor Comments<br />
Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />
specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />
another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />
appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />
criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />
Name & Title of External Advisor<br />
Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />
Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />
The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />
Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 111<br />
> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A<br />
> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />
regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />
session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title BEng Electronic Engineering & Telecommunications with<br />
Industrial Experience<br />
Programme Code H692<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Engineering (BEng) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
The proposed programme develops the existing programme BEng Electronic Engineering & Telecommunications by adding an<br />
Industrial Experience year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give students the<br />
opportunity to utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired through the<br />
programme of study. This will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
The Electronic Engineering accredited degrees form a group of programmes with the same broad aims <strong>and</strong> objectives; the<br />
difference being that they address different technical flavours of the broad spectrum of the subject area.<br />
Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives are, therefore, common across the family, but the instantiation of these objectives may make use<br />
of different technical aspects within the family.<br />
Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives describe the differences between the programmes <strong>and</strong> Level-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />
between the BEng <strong>and</strong> MEng degrees.<br />
Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />
At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following abilities:<br />
• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations;<br />
• the ability to apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation;<br />
• the ability to use Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering;<br />
• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software);<br />
• the ability to recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong><br />
software ‘tools’ relevant to that particular issue;<br />
• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />
• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />
• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are made in industry;<br />
• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in society;<br />
<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />
• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong><br />
high-level languages;<br />
• the practical skills needed to implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment;<br />
• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a hardware or software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to<br />
identify faults;<br />
• the design skills needed to synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the<br />
best option from a range of<br />
alternatives), to implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original specification;<br />
• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in particular written information, effectively;<br />
• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic.<br />
Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />
• To emphasise computer systems <strong>and</strong> software;<br />
• To focus in particular on the increasingly important area of artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing.<br />
An industrial placement during the programme supports student learning about the application of Electronic Engineering &<br />
Telecommunications in an organisational context. The aims of the placement year are to:<br />
• Ground the taught components of the programme in practical experience at a scale not possible within the College<br />
• Improve career preparation, giving students a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of future career options, improving their career prospects.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />
practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />
artificial intelligence <strong>and</strong> network computing<br />
the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />
the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />
relevant to that particular issue<br />
reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />
synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />
range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />
reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />
apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />
apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />
make a clearer connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of technical circuit-diagrams, flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages<br />
communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />
identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
4) Programme Structure<br />
The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />
pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />
modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />
Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />
Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />
The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />
Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />
equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />
X<br />
Module Title<br />
Telecommunications & Internet<br />
Fundamentals<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Semester<br />
ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Introduction to Electronic Systems ELE102 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Engineering Mathematics MAE111 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Electric & Magnetic Fields ELE210 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Digital Circuit Design ELE202 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Telecoms Systems ELE302 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Digital Systems Design ELE335 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Signals & Systems Theory ELE374 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Electronic Devices & Applications ELE303 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
X Microwave & Optical Transmission ELE366 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />
X BEng Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X Digital Signal Processing ELE503 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Operational Financial Management MAT402 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Microwave Electronics ELE569 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Communication Systems Electronics ELE444 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X Product Development ELE606 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X Wireless Networks ELE025 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />
5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />
achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />
the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />
sources, including The Learning Institute<br />
Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />
introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />
develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />
<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />
students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />
The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />
project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />
hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />
skills.<br />
The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />
evaluation forms (30%).<br />
6) Programme Management<br />
Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />
Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />
in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />
4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />
falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />
progression.<br />
Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />
established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />
informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />
discussing student feedback.<br />
7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />
In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />
information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />
None<br />
8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />
This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />
The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />
will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />
regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />
between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />
(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />
the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />
times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />
also those available at the University level.<br />
During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />
monitors the placement.<br />
9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />
Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />
None<br />
10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />
List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />
The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.<br />
11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />
If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />
Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />
should also be described in detail.<br />
N/A
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />
Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />
that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
13) External Advisor Comments<br />
Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />
specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />
another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />
appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />
criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />
Name & Title of External Advisor<br />
Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />
Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />
The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />
Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A<br />
> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 112<br />
> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />
regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />
session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title Computing & ICT with Industrial Experience<br />
Programme Code II19<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
The proposed programme develops the existing programme BScs(Eng) Computing & ICT by adding an Industrial Experience<br />
year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give students the opportunity to utilise in a<br />
practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired through the programme of study. This<br />
will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
The course will enable students to study cutting edge technologies in the areas of Internet Computing, e-Commerce,<br />
Engineering <strong>and</strong> Communications. Students are given the opportunity to add options from other subject areas such as<br />
languages.<br />
Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />
At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following abilities:<br />
• the ability to appreciate the broad needs of a business<br />
• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations;<br />
• the ability to use Information Communications Technology as a key tool to design “solutions” which will meet business needs<br />
using best practice in terms of software <strong>and</strong> business principles;<br />
• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems;<br />
• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />
• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />
• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are made in industry;<br />
• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in society;<br />
<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />
• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages;<br />
• the practical skills needed to implement software;<br />
• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults;<br />
• the design skills needed to synthesise a design in software from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />
range of alternatives), to implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original specification;<br />
• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in particular written information, effectively;<br />
• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic;<br />
• the skill to manage systems to give corporate advantage to employers.<br />
Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />
• To combine technical aspects of ICT <strong>and</strong> real situations in business, commerce <strong>and</strong> industry, as well as providing a thorough<br />
grounding in key business areas.<br />
An industrial placement during the programme supports student learning about the application of Computing & ICT in an<br />
organisational context. The aims of the placement year are to:<br />
• Ground the taught components of the programme in practical experience at a scale not possible within the College<br />
• Improve career preparation, giving students a better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of future career options, improving their career prospects.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />
practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />
the broad needs of a business
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />
the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />
relevant to that particular issue<br />
reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />
synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />
range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />
reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
C 5<br />
C 6<br />
recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />
apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />
apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />
work as part of a team<br />
make a clear connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />
manage time effectively<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />
verify the correct behaviour of a software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults<br />
communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />
identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
4) Programme Structure<br />
The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />
pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />
modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />
Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />
Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />
The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />
Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />
equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />
X<br />
Module Title<br />
Telecommunications & Internet<br />
Fundamentals<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Semester<br />
ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Fundamentals of Management BUS001 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Discrete Techniques for Computing MAE113 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Internet Programming ELE205 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Business Economics BUS017 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Telecoms Systems ELE302 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Software Engineering ELE304 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Accounting for Business BUS006 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Internet Applications ELE404 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Marketing BUS011 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />
X ICT Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X Information Systems Management ELE610 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Fundamentals of Strategy BUS004 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Internet Databases ELE012 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Multimedia Systems ELE006 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X Artificial Intelligence ELE611 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X Human Resource Management BUS014 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />
5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />
achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />
the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />
sources, including The Learning Institute<br />
Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />
introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />
develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />
<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />
students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />
The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />
project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />
hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />
skills.<br />
The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />
evaluation forms (30%).<br />
No
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
6) Programme Management<br />
Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />
Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />
College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />
in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />
4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />
falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />
progression.<br />
Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />
established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />
informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />
discussing student feedback.<br />
7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />
In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />
information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />
None<br />
8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />
This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />
The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />
will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />
regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />
between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />
(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />
the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />
times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />
also those available at the University level.<br />
During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />
monitors the placement.<br />
9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />
Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />
None<br />
10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />
List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />
The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />
If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />
Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />
should also be described in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />
Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />
that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
13) External Advisor Comments<br />
Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />
specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />
another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />
appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />
criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />
Name & Title of External Advisor<br />
Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />
Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />
The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />
Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 113<br />
> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A<br />
> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />
regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />
session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title Computing & ICT with Business Management with<br />
Industrial Experience<br />
Programme Code INC1<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (Engineering) (BSc (Eng)) FT with Placement 4 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Dr John Schormans<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
The proposed programme develops the existing programme BSc (Eng) Electronic Engineering & ICT with Business Management<br />
by adding an Industrial Experience year, following the model successfully established in Computer Science. This will give<br />
students the opportunity to utilise in a practical, workplace based context the skills <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge already acquired<br />
through the programme of study. This will have a direct positive impact on student employability <strong>and</strong> career development.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
The course will enable students to study cutting edge technologies in the areas of Internet Computing, eCommerce Engineering<br />
<strong>and</strong> Communications. Students are given the opportunity to add options from other subject areas such as languages.<br />
Skill-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives:<br />
At the end of his/her degree, each student should be able to demonstrate the following<br />
abilities:<br />
• the ability to appreciate the broad needs of a business<br />
• the ability to recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong><br />
unfamiliar situations;<br />
• the ability to use Information Communications Technology as a key tool to<br />
design “solutions” which will meet business needs using best practice in terms<br />
of software <strong>and</strong> business principles;<br />
• the ability to underst<strong>and</strong> practical issues concerning real systems;<br />
• the ability to work as part of a team;<br />
• the ability to manage time effectively;<br />
• the ability to appreciate the financial background against which decisions are<br />
made in industry;<br />
• the ability to show a certain level of reflection on the role of engineering in<br />
society;<br />
<strong>and</strong> the following skills:<br />
• the perceptive skills needed to underst<strong>and</strong> information presented in the form of<br />
flow-charts <strong>and</strong> high-level languages;<br />
• the practical skills needed to implement software;<br />
• the analytical skills needed to verify the correct behaviour of a software<br />
system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults;<br />
• the design skills needed to synthesise a design in software from a specification<br />
(including the choice of the best option from a range of alternatives), to<br />
implement the design <strong>and</strong> to evaluate the design against the original<br />
specification;<br />
• the written <strong>and</strong> oral communication skills needed to present information, in<br />
particular written information, effectively;<br />
• the critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic;<br />
• the skill to manage systems to give corporate advantage to employers.<br />
Context-based aims <strong>and</strong> objectives<br />
• To combine technical aspects of ICT <strong>and</strong> real situations in business, commerce<br />
<strong>and</strong> industry, as well as providing a thorough grounding in key business areas;<br />
• To provide enhanced business <strong>and</strong> financial skills.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
Information Technology as a key tool pervading all aspects of Electronic Engineering<br />
practical issues concerning real systems (whether hardware or software)<br />
the broad needs of a business<br />
the financial background against which decisions are made in industry<br />
the student's role <strong>and</strong> how it relates to the work of the employing organisation (from the placement)<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
recognise insufficient existing knowledge <strong>and</strong> search for the necessary scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’<br />
relevant to that particular issue<br />
reflect on the role of engineering in society<br />
synthesise a design (in hardware <strong>and</strong>/or software) from a specification (including the choice of the best option from a<br />
range of alternatives), implement the design <strong>and</strong> evaluate the design against the original specification<br />
reflect on their experience <strong>and</strong> to evaluate their performance (from the placement)<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
C 5<br />
C 6<br />
recall factual knowledge <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply it in familiar <strong>and</strong> unfamiliar situations<br />
apply scientific, mathematical <strong>and</strong> software ‘tools’ to a familiar or unfamiliar situation<br />
apply critical reasoning skills needed to appraise a particular topic<br />
ability to work as part of a team<br />
make a clearer connection between theory <strong>and</strong> practice (from the placement)<br />
manage time effectively<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
implement a piece of hardware or software <strong>and</strong> to use laboratory test equipment<br />
verify the correct behaviour of a software system or component <strong>and</strong> to be able to identify faults<br />
communicate effectively both in writing <strong>and</strong> orally, with particular emphasis on written information<br />
identify, reflect on <strong>and</strong> plan for their own personal <strong>and</strong> professional development needs (from the placement)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
D 5<br />
manage systems to give corporate advantage to employers<br />
4) Programme Structure<br />
The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />
pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />
modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />
Students must complete 120 credits in each developmental year. All modules are 15 credits with the exception of the Industrial<br />
Placement Year (30 credits) <strong>and</strong> the BEng Project (30 credits).<br />
The Industrial Placement Year takes place in the 3rd year <strong>and</strong> counts as 30 credits at Level 5. Students must pass the Industrial<br />
Placement Year in order to qualify for the award. Students who do not pass the Industrial Placement Year are transferred onto the<br />
equivalent programme without Industrial Experience.<br />
X<br />
Module Title<br />
Telecommunications & Internet<br />
Fundamentals<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Semester<br />
ELE103 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Programming Fundamentals ELE161 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Fundamentals of Management BUS001 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Discrete Techniques for Computing MAE113 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 1<br />
X Java Programming ELE201 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Professional Applications ELE104 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Fundamentals of Web Technology DCS150 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Economics for Business BUS017 15 4 Compulsory 1 Semester 2<br />
X Telecoms Systems ELE302 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Software Engineering ELE304 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Financial Accounting BUS021 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1<br />
X Internet Applications ELE404 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 1
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
X Design & Build Project ELE490 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Network Programming ELE406 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Internet Protocols ELE403 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Marketing BUS011 15 5 Compulsory 2 Semester 2<br />
X Industrial Placement Year DCS250 30 5 Core 3 Semesters 1-3<br />
X Strategy BUS204 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Information Systems Management ELE610 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Coordination <strong>and</strong> Social Dynamics BUS206 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 1<br />
X Internet Databases ELE012 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X ICT Project ELE521 30 6 Compulsory 4 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X International Business BUS304 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
X Human Resource Management BUS324 15 6 Compulsory 4 Semester 2<br />
Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />
5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />
achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />
the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />
sources, including The Learning Institute<br />
Each non-project-based course unit involves lectures, problem solving coursework <strong>and</strong> practical sessions. Lectures are used to<br />
introduce principles <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> also to illustrate how they can be applied in practice. Coursework allows students to<br />
develop their skills in problem solving <strong>and</strong> to gain practical experience. Practical sessions provide students with the guidance<br />
<strong>and</strong> help while solving a problem. These lessons take the form of exercise classes <strong>and</strong> programming laboratories that allow the<br />
students to learn-by-doing in order to complement the lectures.<br />
The assessment of the taught course units takes place through a written examination <strong>and</strong> practical coursework. The final year<br />
project is examined on the basis of a written report, a formal oral presentation, <strong>and</strong> a demonstration of the piece of software or<br />
hardware developed by the student. In addition to the final year project, other modules introduce project <strong>and</strong> group working<br />
skills.<br />
The Industrial Placement year is assessed through a 5000 word report (60%), a learning log (5%), a viva (5%), <strong>and</strong> two employer<br />
evaluation forms (30%).<br />
No
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
6) Programme Management<br />
Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />
Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> coherence will be maintained via internal curriculum reviews undertaken within the department <strong>and</strong> governed by<br />
College regulations as detailed in parts 4.04-4.53 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations<br />
in place at that time. Progression for the programme will be governed by College regulations, specifically those detailed in parts<br />
4.54-4.73 of the College <strong>Academic</strong> Regulation (Session 2010-2011), or relevant regulations in place at that time. This programme<br />
falls under the remit of the Electronic Engineering Examination Board. This board will consider <strong>and</strong> approve c<strong>and</strong>idates for<br />
progression.<br />
Student feedback will be integrated into all curriculum <strong>and</strong> programme review activities via the mechanisms already<br />
established in the School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science. This will include formal (via questionnaires) <strong>and</strong><br />
informal student evaluations. The School's Student-Staff Liaison Committee will form another medium for receiving <strong>and</strong><br />
discussing student feedback.<br />
7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />
In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />
information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />
None<br />
8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />
This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />
The student's first point of contact will be their personal tutor who will be assigned at the beginning of the programme. The tutor<br />
will be responsible for both academic <strong>and</strong> welfare issues of the student at QMUL. The tutor will meet his assigned students at<br />
regular weekly or weekly meetings to monitor their progress <strong>and</strong> help coordinate any further interaction that may be necessary<br />
between the student <strong>and</strong> other members of staff. In addition to the tutors, students will be assigned supervisors for their<br />
(individual <strong>and</strong> group) projects who will meet regularly during the period of the related module to ensure progress is made <strong>and</strong><br />
the students are acquiring the necessary transferable skills. The school h<strong>and</strong>book will be provided (<strong>and</strong> made accessible at all<br />
times) to students, where all the channels of support will be outlined. These include the support channels within the school <strong>and</strong><br />
also those available at the University level.<br />
During the Industrial Placement Year the School's Industrial Placement Manager maintains contact with the student <strong>and</strong><br />
monitors the placement.<br />
9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />
Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />
None<br />
10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />
List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />
The academic staff currently delivering the existing QMUL modules will be teaching in the programme.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />
If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />
Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />
should also be described in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />
Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />
that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />
Electronic Engineering Undergraduate SEB<br />
13) External Advisor Comments<br />
Detailed comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external<br />
specialist opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in<br />
another institution. The external adviser should be able to comment in suffcient detail on the<br />
appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection<br />
criteria, role <strong>and</strong> expectations of External Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
External advisor comments were submitted with a previous related Part I programme proposal.<br />
Name & Title of External Advisor<br />
Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />
Address for Correspondence (<strong>and</strong> email)<br />
The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />
Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? N/A
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 114<br />
> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? N/A<br />
> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />
regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Programme Proposal(s)<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
MSc Mathematical Finance (Part1)<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
The programme will be run jointly by the SMS <strong>and</strong> SEF. The<br />
potential pool of applications will be science <strong>and</strong> engineering<br />
graduates. This is different from the masters programmes in<br />
the SEF which are open to economics graduates, thus<br />
avoiding the direct competition between the two Programmes.<br />
SMS will have to recruit staff to deliver the advanced aspects<br />
of mathematical modelling as applied to finance. The<br />
corresponding recruitment plan was submitted by the School<br />
as part of its Autumn 2010 PAR submission.<br />
The proposal is significantly detailed <strong>and</strong> outlines a clear<br />
rationale for exp<strong>and</strong>ing student number in this area. Student<br />
surveys,marketing information <strong>and</strong> employer feedback<br />
areprovided.<br />
If the programme is going to be offered in FT <strong>and</strong> PT mode of<br />
study this should be indicated in the summary information<br />
section of the form.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
Part 1 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 1<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School's planning round submission for this academic<br />
session, a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title MSc in Mathematical Finance<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Master of Science (MSc) Full Time 1 Calendar Year<br />
Proposed Start Date Sept 2012 Is this a closed / restricted programme? No<br />
Anticipated Student Numbers 25-30 students in 2012-13, increasing to 60 in 2013-14; overseas up to 80% of intake<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
G150 Mathematical Modelling<br />
L111 Financial Economics<br />
N321 Investment<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible Cost Centre<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Will the programme be funded by another EC public source?<br />
Will the programme be funded by another source which is not an EC public source?<br />
Online application process required (for postgraduate programmes only)?<br />
No<br />
No<br />
Yes
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
Programme Organiser Prof. Boris Khoruzhenko<br />
UK/EU Tuitition Fee Non-st<strong>and</strong>ard Fee Proposed Non-st<strong>and</strong>ard UK/EU Fee (£) £9,000.00<br />
Overseas Tuition Fee Other (please specify) Proposed Overseas Fee (£) £15,000.00<br />
Non-st<strong>and</strong>ard fees must be approved by the Costing <strong>and</strong> Pricing Group <strong>and</strong> the Fees Office should be notified<br />
when any non-st<strong>and</strong>ard fee is agreed.<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
The School of Mathematical Sciences (SMS) currently offers two PGT programmes: MSc in Mathematics <strong>and</strong> MSc in Astrophysics,<br />
with an annual intake of about 25 students in total. These two programmes are traditional in that they aim at preparing students<br />
for independent study in the subject area. There is not much potential for expansion of these programmes. In contrast, the<br />
School's undergraduate (UG) programme underwent a period of unprecedented growth of intake <strong>and</strong> entry qualifications which<br />
was helped, amongst other factors, by the popularity of the School's UG programmes involving mathematics <strong>and</strong> finance. Last<br />
year, BSc in Mathematics with Finance <strong>and</strong> Accounting, one of ten UG programmes offered by the SMS, accounted for more than<br />
30% of applications. The popularity of the mathematical finance diet of the UG module provision in the SMS goes beyond<br />
specialised study programmes, with more than two-thirds of mathematics undergraduate taking at least one module from this<br />
diet.<br />
The School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance (SEF) operates a very successful <strong>and</strong> popular Masters programmes in finance with an<br />
annual intake of about 300 students in total. The SEF is one of the best Economics departments nationally with an excellent<br />
reputations <strong>and</strong> vast expertise in financial economics.<br />
The aim of this proposal is to capitalise on the popularity of mathematical finance locally <strong>and</strong> nationwide. The proposed<br />
programme will provide a thorough grounding in the core principles of mathematics as applied to finance along with the core<br />
principles of finance. This would open to students a host of career opportunities in the banking sector, public services, industry<br />
<strong>and</strong> commerce that require specialist knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills. It is expected that the proposed programme will be popular thus<br />
enabling the SMS to exp<strong>and</strong> the PGT numbers in accordance with the <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Strategic Plan. It is also expected that the<br />
programme will provide financial underpinning of the SMS growth in terms of its core research activities, as well as additional<br />
significant income for the College.<br />
The programme will be run jointly by the SMS <strong>and</strong> SEF making use of the SEF's reputation <strong>and</strong> expertise in provision of masters<br />
programmes in finance. The SMS will deliver mathematical modelling aspects of the programme (four or five new level 7<br />
modules will have to be developed) whilst the SEF will deliver core aspects of finance by making available their existing level 7<br />
finance modules. The potential pool of applications for the proposed Mathematical Finance programme will be science <strong>and</strong><br />
engineering graduates. This is different from the masters programmes in the SEF which are open to economics graduates, thus<br />
avoiding the direct competition between the two Programmes.<br />
Currently, the SMS does not have expertise to deliver the advanced aspects of mathematical modelling as applied to finance <strong>and</strong><br />
will have to recruit staff for that purpose. The corresponding recruitment plan was submitted by the School as part of its Autumn<br />
2010 PAR submission.<br />
2) Marketing Information<br />
Evidence of student dem<strong>and</strong> for the proposed programme (further guidance <strong>and</strong> information should be sought<br />
from Corporate Affairs). This could include relevant A level trends <strong>and</strong> UCAS or HESA data; relevant UK, EU<br />
<strong>and</strong> international economic data; relevant regional, national or sector-specific data. Consideration should also<br />
be given to whether the market is UK-wide, EU or international (consult International Office).<br />
There is a large dem<strong>and</strong>, UK/EU wide <strong>and</strong> internationally, for MSc courses in Mathematical Finance due to the excellent career<br />
prospects for students. London is one of the world biggest financial centres making it an attractive choice of location for<br />
postgraduate study in finances <strong>and</strong> the location of <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> close to the City makes it a natural place to offer postgraduate<br />
training in this subject area.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
As much as 230 students of our current undergraduate finalists took the first course in mathematical finance. 133 of these<br />
students were surveyed in October 2010. More than 85% of these were interested in working in the finance/banking sector <strong>and</strong><br />
more than 50% of the surveyed students expressed interest in an MSc programme in Mathematical Finance at QMUL should this<br />
be offered. A question on the fee level was also included in the survey. Students were asked where they think <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong><br />
should st<strong>and</strong>. The majority of students indicated a figure between £10K <strong>and</strong> £15K, with mean about £13K.<br />
Following the recent financial crisis, there is a bigger appreciation of the importance of underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the theories underlining<br />
various financial instruments to the point where leading banks offer their employees CPD courses in mathematical finance. This<br />
will filter into the recruitment cycle with a greater dem<strong>and</strong> for new recruits with specialists mathematics knowledge.<br />
3) Competitor Provision (where applicable)<br />
A brief summary including programme titles, length of time programmes have been offered, numbers of<br />
applicants <strong>and</strong> registered students should be included.<br />
MSc in Financial Mathematics/Mathematical Finance are offered by IC, LSE, KCL <strong>and</strong> City (Cass) in London <strong>and</strong> by Oxford,<br />
Warwick, Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, York, Edinburgh, Leicester <strong>and</strong> Exeter outside London. Official data on the number of<br />
applications <strong>and</strong> registered students is not available. There is strong competition but also strong dem<strong>and</strong>. The fee level varies<br />
from £7-10K Home <strong>and</strong> £12-15K Overseas (Exeter, Leeds, Leicester, Edinburgh, Birmingham, Manchester) to £20-24K Home <strong>and</strong><br />
Overseas (LSE, KCL, City, Oxford IC).<br />
4) Employer Feedback<br />
What is the dem<strong>and</strong> for graduates with this/these qualifications? Feedback from employers (named<br />
individuals); Feedback from Professional or Statutory Regulatory Bodies; Comments from leaders in the field<br />
etc. Consult the Careers Service for any relevant data.<br />
The dem<strong>and</strong> for quantitative analysts <strong>and</strong> the likes from the banking industry is very high <strong>and</strong> MSc graduates in Mathematical<br />
Finance have excellent career prospects. For example, a job search at http://www.quantfinancejobs.com/jobs/masters.asp on Jan<br />
7th, 2011, shows 96 jobs offers at masters level upwards. According the feedback from one of graduate recruiters in the finance<br />
sector received by our Careers "... we have a number of risk programmes that students from this course may be interested in<br />
applying for."<br />
5) Prospective, Current <strong>and</strong> Former Students' views<br />
Feedback from prospective, current <strong>and</strong> former students studying or who have studied in cognate areas - via<br />
questionnaire or focus groups.<br />
A questionnaire given to the current undergraduate students registered for 'Introduction to Mathematical Finance'<br />
showed that 21% of them are seriously interested in an MSc in Mathematical Finance should that be offered by QMUL in the<br />
future. The detailed statistics of the student responses are below:<br />
Introduction to Mathematical Finance survey (28 Oct 2010 by Dr Hugo Touchette)<br />
133 responses, the table below shows percentages of responses<br />
Strongly disagree 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly agree<br />
Question 1 2 3 4 5<br />
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
a) I’m considering doing an MSc in the future 19 13 28 18 22<br />
b) Interested in Financial Maths 17 19 26 24 14<br />
c) Interested in MSc in Financial Maths at QMUL 26 20 33 13 8<br />
d) Interested in working in finance/banking sector 8 5 18 34 35<br />
e) IMF useful for employability 7 2 24 42 24<br />
f) IMF is an easy module 11 27 39 18 5<br />
g) I took IMF to work finance/banking sector 10 15 27 24 24<br />
h) I'll take Further Topics in Mathematical Finance 20 7 19 19 36
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
6) Entry Requirements<br />
Provide the entry requirements for the proposed programme, including the level of English Language<br />
proficiency (IELTS / TOEFL) required for International applicants.<br />
A good degree (at least 2.i or equivalent) in a subject with substantial mathematics component (e.g., Mathematics, Statistics,<br />
Physics, Economics, Computer Science, Engineering).<br />
IELTS/ TOEFL st<strong>and</strong>ard requirements.<br />
7) Programme Description<br />
Provide a programme description for the proposed programme (this will appear in marketing material).<br />
The MSc in Mathematical Finance is a specialist masters programme aiming at providing graduate students <strong>and</strong> professionals<br />
with a rigorous training <strong>and</strong> strong analytical <strong>and</strong> quantitative skills in finance . The intensive programme introduces students to<br />
the mathematics used by the practitioners in the field <strong>and</strong> covers wide range of analytical tools applied in quantitative asset<br />
pricing <strong>and</strong> financial derivatives.<br />
The programme is designed for high caliber science <strong>and</strong> engineering graduates who aim to pursue careers as quantitative<br />
analysts in the private sector, government or financial institutions. Students will learn about financial modelling, asset pricing<br />
theory, <strong>and</strong> financial risk management, as well as more theoretical subjects such as the theory of stochastic processes <strong>and</strong><br />
stochastic analysis. Scientific computing <strong>and</strong> programming is an important element of this programme.<br />
The programme is run jointly by the School of Mathematical Sciences <strong>and</strong> the School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> is offered full<br />
time (one year) <strong>and</strong> part-time (two years). Full time students will take four modules per semester, followed by a 10,000 word<br />
dissertation. There are also two pre-sessional modules in probability & statistics <strong>and</strong> financial markets <strong>and</strong> economics providing a<br />
good opportunity for students to enhance the necessary prerequisite knowledge.<br />
8) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
This programme is designed to prepare science <strong>and</strong> engineering graduates for a quantitative analyst career in the financial <strong>and</strong><br />
banking industry. It also aims to meet regional <strong>and</strong> national need for taught mathematical finance at the postgraduate level. The<br />
programme provides a thorough foundation of mathematical models <strong>and</strong> techniques as applied to finance <strong>and</strong> covers the main<br />
concepts <strong>and</strong> analytical tools of financial engineering including asset pricing <strong>and</strong> financial derivatives. It also provides a wide<br />
range of transferable skills in preparation for career paths in banking, industry, <strong>and</strong> commerce.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
9) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
financial markets <strong>and</strong> institutions<br />
asset valuation, measures of risk <strong>and</strong> portfolio analysis through analytic study<br />
theory <strong>and</strong> practice of pricing <strong>and</strong> hedging derivative securities<br />
mathematics underpinning financial modelling in the context of asset pricing <strong>and</strong> risk management<br />
techniques <strong>and</strong> tools of financial modelling<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
B 5<br />
conduct independent enquiry <strong>and</strong> explain <strong>and</strong> argue conclusions clearly <strong>and</strong> concisely<br />
connect mathematical techniques <strong>and</strong> economic theory <strong>and</strong> methods <strong>and</strong> apply these to financial modelling <strong>and</strong> risk<br />
analysis<br />
learn <strong>and</strong> synthesise new knowledge relevant to financial modelling<br />
critically evaluate own progress <strong>and</strong> analyse work of others<br />
approach problem solving <strong>and</strong> decision making through analytic study<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
work independently <strong>and</strong> in collaboration with others<br />
use quantitative financial data confidently <strong>and</strong> competently<br />
communicate in a clear <strong>and</strong> effective way <strong>and</strong> use communication technologies competently<br />
engage critically with knowledge<br />
Practical skills - able to:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
D 5<br />
use competently probabilistic models <strong>and</strong> stochastic calculus for pricing derivative securities<br />
give quantitative estimates of risks <strong>and</strong> design an optimal investment portfolio<br />
solve stochastic differential equations<br />
use competently programming languages C <strong>and</strong> C++<br />
perform numerical computations <strong>and</strong> simulations<br />
10) Indicative Curriculum<br />
The indicative curriculum for the proposed programme in terms of proposed modules to be studied in each<br />
academic year of study (which will appear in marketing material 'subject to approval'). Please be clear which<br />
modules are new <strong>and</strong> which modules already exist <strong>and</strong> have been approved.<br />
The study programme consists of 6 core modules <strong>and</strong> two electives with an even split between semesters, <strong>and</strong> a summer<br />
dissertation project. Students will also be offered two pre-sessional modules. Three core mathematics modules, to be developed<br />
by the School of Mathematical Sciences (SMS), will cover the most important mathematical techniques used in mathematical<br />
finance. These modules will have to be approved. Three core economics modules will cover the relevant financial instruments.<br />
These modules already exist <strong>and</strong> are offered within the Masters Programme run by the School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance (SEF).<br />
Two specialist electives in financial mathematics will have to be developed by the SMS, the rest of electives are existing modules<br />
offered by the SMS <strong>and</strong> SEF.<br />
Module Title Credits Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Semester<br />
X Computational Methods in Finance (new, SMS) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 1<br />
X<br />
Foundations of Mathematical Modelling in<br />
Finance (new, SMS)<br />
15 7 Core 1 Semester 1<br />
X ECOM043 Quantitative Asset Pricing (SEF) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 1<br />
X ECOM014 Time Series Analysis (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />
X MTHM736 Mathematical Statistics (SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />
X ECOM050 Investment Management (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />
X MTHM007 Measure Theory <strong>and</strong> Probability (SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />
X<br />
Stochastic Calculus <strong>and</strong> Black Scholes Theory<br />
(new, SMS)<br />
15 7 Core 1 Semester 2<br />
X ECOM044 Advanced Asset Pricing (SEF) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 2
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
X ECOM 026 Financial Derivatives (SEF) 15 7 Core 1 Semester 2<br />
X Advanced Computing in Finance (new, SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />
X ECOM055 Risk Management in Banking (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />
X<br />
Portfolio Theory <strong>and</strong> Risk Management (new,<br />
SMS)<br />
15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />
X MTHM042 Bayesian Statistics (SMS) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />
X MSc Dissertation (10 000 words) 60 7 Core 1 Semester 3<br />
X Pre-sessional Probability <strong>and</strong> Statistics (new, SMS) TBC 7 Study only 1 Semester 1<br />
X<br />
Pre-sessional Financial Instruments <strong>and</strong> Markets<br />
(new, SMS)<br />
TBC 7 Study only 1 Semester 1<br />
X ECOM003 Econometric A (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 1<br />
X ECOM025 Financial Econometrics (SEF) 15 7 Elective 1 Semester 2<br />
11) Assessment<br />
Provide a brief outline of the assessment methods for the proposed programme (which will appear in<br />
marketing material 'subject to approval'). Assessment methods should take due consideration of the approved<br />
assessment methods as defined in the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations.<br />
Assessment is by a variety of methods including formal written examinations, in-class tests, coursework of various forms,<br />
presentations, <strong>and</strong> independent dissertation in line with the regulations for projects/dissertations at Masters level.<br />
12) Professional Accreditation<br />
Specify the accrediting body (if applicable) <strong>and</strong> the nature of the accreditation: e.g. qualification to practice,<br />
exemption from professional exams, membership of a profesisonal body).<br />
not applicable<br />
13) Career Opportunities<br />
Specify how this programme may contribute to/enhance students' career prospects. This could include<br />
consideration of how students are supported in exploring their career options (e.g Career Liaison Tutor,<br />
specific personal tutor session, specific careers events, industrial visits, notification of careers events). Consult<br />
the Careers Service for any relevant data.<br />
The programme will prepare students for a wide range of careers, especially in the banking <strong>and</strong> finance sector,<br />
as well as marketing, public services, consultancy, industry <strong>and</strong> commerce. Special tutor sessions on composing CVs <strong>and</strong><br />
projective the positive image during interviews are planned. Also planned are guest lectures by practitioners in the field. The<br />
possibility of industrial visits <strong>and</strong> summer project industry placements will be investigated.<br />
Also the college Careers Office provides<br />
- use of 1-2-1 careers discussions with a career adviser to aid in choosing a career path:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 115<br />
- support in job applications <strong>and</strong> PhD applications through the careers service<br />
- in-department careers events, such as employer talks or alumni networking<br />
- notification of all relevant careers events for maths students, for example from 2010: IT & Technology Fair, Focus on Finance<br />
week with talks from city employers <strong>and</strong> networking with alumni working in the finance sector.<br />
Approval of Part 1 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
David<br />
Arrowsmith<br />
Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />
DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />
email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.02.14 12:20:57 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Digitally signed by George Kapetanios<br />
DN: cn=George Kapetanios, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, UoL, ou=School of Economics<br />
<strong>and</strong> Finance,<br />
email=g.kapetanios@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.02.15 10:16:44 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Once a programme has passed Part 1 approval it can now be marketed. In order to publicise a new<br />
programme the School administering the programme (through the programme proposer) should liaise<br />
directly with Corporate Affairs to ensure that all the neccessary information required to market the<br />
programme is provided.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Programme Proposal(s)<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London SMD<br />
MSc Endodontic Practice (Part 2) <strong>and</strong> the following<br />
associated module proposals:<br />
Advanced sciences in relation to Endodotology <strong>and</strong><br />
integrated clinical endodontics<br />
Audit Project in Endodontic Practice<br />
Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology<br />
Clinical skills in Endodontics<br />
Literature Review in relation to Endodontic Practice<br />
Preclinical Endodontic Skills<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
The Board may wish to consider the programme duration in<br />
part-time mode of study for the MSc Endodontic Practice,<br />
which is stated as 3 calendar years.<br />
Support <strong>and</strong> comments from an independent external advisor<br />
are to follow.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Part 2 Programme Proposal Form<br />
All sections must be completed in full <strong>and</strong> supplementary information attached where requested. Part 2<br />
proposals should be submitted to the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong> who will arrange for the consideration of the<br />
proposal at Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
If this proposed programme was not included in the School planning round submission for this academic<br />
session a signed Confirmation of Resources form must be attached.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Proposed Programme Title Endodontic Practice<br />
Programme Code<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Master of Science (MSc) Part Time 3 Calendar Years<br />
Postgraduate Diploma (PG Dip) Part Time (Calendar Year) 2 Calendar Years<br />
Proposed Start Date September 2011<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry/Institute o<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
n/a<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
n/a<br />
Programme Organiser Dr Sharan Sidhu<br />
1) Programme Rationale<br />
Details of the rationale for the proposed programme. In addition to being academically sound, these should<br />
include strategic reasons, financial reasons <strong>and</strong>/or recruitment reasons.<br />
As people live longer they also expect to be able to retain their teeth for longer. Current practice is to save teeth by endodontic<br />
(advanced restorative) treatment wherever possible. There is limited experience in endodontic practice provided in most dental<br />
undergraduate courses which is often insufficient to deal with the many advanced restorative problems encountered in general<br />
dental practice. As a result, a large number of cases that could be treated in the General Dental Services are referred to the Barts<br />
<strong>and</strong> The London Dental Institute, leading to unnecessarily long waiting times <strong>and</strong> a delayed delivery of service. In addition, the<br />
high referral rate for such treatment has given rise to a need for dentists with a special interest in endodontics to provide the<br />
relevant treatment. The course will not only fit within the existing taught postgraduate portfolio of the Institute of Dentistry,
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
emphasising its role as a leading educational provider of postgraduate training in the region, but also help to exp<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
diversify the recruitment base of the school. The number of applications from current dentists for the Diploma level course<br />
indicates the dem<strong>and</strong> for advanced education <strong>and</strong> training whilst feedback from current students supports the need to offer the<br />
opportunity for the Diploma to be upgraded to Masters level.<br />
This three year part-time programme is uniquely structured to allow dental practitioners to enhance their knowledge <strong>and</strong> clinical<br />
ability in this field, thus offering an appropriate response to national trends. The programme will provide an in-depth approach<br />
for exploring current concepts in clinical endodontics, offering deeper knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the subject, improving<br />
clinical skills <strong>and</strong> leading to increased job satisfaction. It will also facilitate the exposure of each dental practitioner to their peers,<br />
encouraging a synergistic exchange of ideas <strong>and</strong> experience <strong>and</strong> contribute to <strong>and</strong> enhance participants’ career options by<br />
allowing them access to current endodontic concepts <strong>and</strong> research. It can be part of a dentist's Personal Development Plan.<br />
2) Educational Aims of the Programme<br />
Please provide the educational aims (academic <strong>and</strong> professional/employability) for the proposed programme.<br />
This programme aims to:<br />
• meet the local, regional <strong>and</strong> national need for more dentists with a special interest in endodontics<br />
• enhance students' knowledge of advanced aspects of endodontics <strong>and</strong> enable them to apply it to their clinical work<br />
• foster appropriate advanced clinical skills in endodontic practice<br />
• promote a critical approach to evaluating relevant literature so as to be able to establish evidence-based practice in clinical<br />
endodontics<br />
• enhance underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> the impact of clinical governance <strong>and</strong> clinical effectiveness<br />
• encourage the pursuit of independent study <strong>and</strong> audit.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this programme, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this programme. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements<br />
<strong>and</strong> the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The<br />
SEEC Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
The critical review <strong>and</strong> analysis of aspects of endodontic disease <strong>and</strong> its management<br />
The methods of measuring clinical outcomes<br />
The process of undertaking, with critical awareness, analysis of complex, complex, 'cutting edge' or contradictory<br />
areas of clinical <strong>and</strong> scientific knowledge<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Self-reflect on endodontic outcome <strong>and</strong> analysis of research<br />
Evaluate advanced scholarship critically in evidence based endodontic disease, make a case for alternative approaches<br />
<strong>and</strong> explore scientific clinical research in order to be able to audit practice scientific clinical research in order to be able<br />
to audit current practice<br />
Critique <strong>and</strong> evaluate the different approaches to collecting <strong>and</strong> analysing data <strong>and</strong> communicate it coherently
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Appraise <strong>and</strong> investigate cases <strong>and</strong> literature so that an evidence-based approach is undertaken<br />
Recognise cases when referral to tertiary care is required<br />
Promote endodontic treatment as part of comprehensive oral care<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Perform non-surgical endodontic treatment on all teeth<br />
Manage endodontic emergencies <strong>and</strong> dental trauma<br />
Manage the endodontic aspect of multi-disciplinary dental cases<br />
4) Programme Structure<br />
The structure of programme should be described below in detail, including the identification of all potential<br />
pathways / routes <strong>and</strong> modules available; indicating any new modules being proposed. Precise details of the<br />
modules should be given in the table below. The structure of the programme should comply with the <strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework.<br />
The course will be offered on a part-time basis only, either as a two year postgraduate diploma or a three year MSc. The<br />
postgraduate diploma will consist of 4 x30 credit modules listed below:<br />
• Module 1 Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology: 38 seminars, each of 2 hours' duration<br />
• Module 2 Advanced Sciences in relation to Endodontology: 38 seminars, each of 2 hours' duration<br />
• Module 3 Preclinical Endodontic Skills: 22 pre-clinical laboratory practice sessions of 3 hours each on simulators<br />
• Module 4 Clinical Skills in Endodontics: 24 clinical practice sessions of 3 hours each for patient treatment<br />
Students seeking to upgrade their Diploma to an MSc will complete two further modules listed below:<br />
• Module 5: Audit Project in Endodontic Practice (15 credits)<br />
• Module 6: Literature review in relation to Endodontic Practice (45 credits)<br />
Requirements:<br />
• Attendance at all sessions is compulsory.<br />
• Students will need to read <strong>and</strong> critically review at least 5 essential research papers <strong>and</strong> 5 additional papers of relevance, as<br />
suggested by the course organisers.<br />
• Students will need to demonstrate a satisfactory level of ability by passing a practical test of competence (Gateway Test) before<br />
being allowed to do clinical practice.<br />
• During clinical sessions the student is expected to treat 5 - 7 patients in total, to a satisfactory st<strong>and</strong>ard.<br />
The progression threshold mark from the Diploma to the Masters will normally be an average of 60% achieved across Modules<br />
1-4, with no individual module mark being less than 50%.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
X<br />
Module Title<br />
Basic Sciences in relation to<br />
Endodontology<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Semester<br />
30 7 Core 1 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X<br />
Advanced Sciences in relation to<br />
Endodontology<br />
30 7 Core 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X Preclinical Endodontic Skills 30 7 Core 1 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X Clinical Skills in Endodontics 30 7 Core 2 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X Audit Project in Endodontic Practice 15 7 Core 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
X<br />
Literature review in relation to<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
45 7 Core 3 Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Does this programme contain a foundation year or any pre-sessional activity?<br />
5) Teaching, Learning <strong>and</strong> Assessment Strategies<br />
Learning <strong>and</strong> teaching strategies are devised to enable the module <strong>and</strong> programme learning outcomes to be<br />
achieved. Assessment strategies are devised to enable them to be tested. Consideration should be given to<br />
the use of appropriate learning, teaching <strong>and</strong> assessment strategies in light of advice from a number of<br />
sources, including The Learning Institute<br />
A variety of teaching <strong>and</strong> learning methods will be employed including:<br />
• Formal 2-hour seminars given by experts in their field on topics relevant to the study of Endodontics<br />
• Pre-clinical laboratory practice sessions: demonstrations, “h<strong>and</strong>s-on” practical exercises, discussion of outcomes<br />
• Clinical practice sessions: treating patients under supervision, discussion of outcomes<br />
• Self-directed learning: critical review of at least two scientific papers nominated by the programme organisers <strong>and</strong> at least two<br />
more papers selected by the students themselves<br />
• One–to-one tutorials with those students needing additional guidance<br />
• Case presentations: discussion on what was carried out, how, <strong>and</strong> why it was carried out, reflecting on shortcomings <strong>and</strong> how it<br />
could be improved the next time<br />
• reading lists of books <strong>and</strong> journal papers<br />
Assessment strategies will include:<br />
• Formative assessment: regular informal verbal feedback to individual students regarding their performance <strong>and</strong> achievement of<br />
the learning objectives.<br />
• Assessment of competency: There will be a competency-based Practical Test at the end of the Pre-clinical Laboratory-based<br />
Practice Module. The student must pass this “Gateway Test” before being allowed to progress to the Clinical Practice sessions<br />
treating patients. Those who fail will be required to undertake additional practical sessions before taking the “Gateway Test”<br />
again.<br />
• Summative assessment: assessment of each module by written papers, practical skills tests, essay questions, viva voce, clinical<br />
case reports, literature review report <strong>and</strong> audit presentation.<br />
6) Programme Management<br />
Detail the mechanisms for ensuring academic coherence <strong>and</strong> progression <strong>and</strong> integrating student feedback.<br />
Programmes should be compliant with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations, including the respective Assessment<br />
Regulations <strong>and</strong> associated Progression <strong>and</strong> Award Regulations.<br />
Taught postgraduate programmes in the Institute are co-ordinated through the Masters Course Organisers Group which takes an<br />
overview of all taught postgraduate programmes <strong>and</strong> any issues impacting upon their quality. Progression will be managed<br />
throughthe Subject Examination Board.<br />
- Staff-Student Liaison Committee meetings: There are periodic meetings of the Staff-Student Liaison Committee to give the<br />
No
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
students ample opportunity to raise issues concerning the programme.<br />
- Student feedback mechanisms: Clinical programmes facilitate the provision of two way informal feedback. This process will be<br />
adopted <strong>and</strong> developed throughout the course. Formal feedback will be sought twice-yearly via a st<strong>and</strong>ard questionnaire<br />
adopted for use by the Institute's postgraduate programmes, based on NSS content.<br />
- Personal tutor arrangements: The programme organisers will act as personal tutors to the students.<br />
7) Programme-specific Assessment Regulations (if applicable)<br />
In the case of programmes that deviate / do not comply with the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (see above) further<br />
information regarding the nature of any difference <strong>and</strong>/or deviation should be stipulated in detail.<br />
N/A<br />
8) Mechanisms for the Provision of <strong>Academic</strong> Support<br />
This should include details of any induction <strong>and</strong> advice <strong>and</strong> supervisory arrangements for students.<br />
Programme induction: There will be a formal induction to the programme at the start with the programme organisers <strong>and</strong> the<br />
tutors present, to welcome the students <strong>and</strong> to introduce the various components of the programme. There will also be a tour of<br />
the facilities. In addition to the programme lead who will have oversight of the whole cohort's progression students will also be<br />
assigned a personal tutor for the research element (audit <strong>and</strong> literature review) of the programme.<br />
9) Specific Consideration of the needs of Disabled Students<br />
Details of any specific consideration for the needs of Disabled Students.<br />
10) <strong>Academic</strong> Staffing for the Programme<br />
List of academic staff involved in the delivery, including any from collaborative institutions.<br />
Drs Sharan Sidhu, Nectaria Polycarpou <strong>and</strong> R Thomson provide the core academic staff.<br />
11) Distance Learning Programmes (if applicable)<br />
If the programme is distance learning, please specify how student-related data will be provided to the Student<br />
Administration Office. The mechanisms for the enrolment <strong>and</strong> assessment of distance learning students<br />
should also be described in detail.<br />
N/A
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
12) Subject Examination Board Details<br />
Specify the name of the Subject Examination Board (SEB), which will oversee the assessment processes<br />
that operate for the programme(s) <strong>and</strong> modules clarify whether this is a new or existing SEB.<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
13) External Advisor Comments<br />
Comments from at least one external adviser - submissions must be supported by external specialist<br />
opinion, e.g. from a representative of a professional organisation, or a senior academic in another<br />
institution. The external adviser should be able to comment on the appropriateness <strong>and</strong> viability of the<br />
proposed programme (s). For further guidance regarding the selection criteria for <strong>and</strong> role of External<br />
Advisors please refer to the External Advisor Guidelines.<br />
Letter attached from Professor WP Saunders.<br />
Name & Title of External Advisor<br />
Current Post & Institution / Organisation<br />
Professor WP Saunders<br />
Dean/Head of Department, University of Dundee Dental School<br />
Address for Correspondence Park Place, Dundee DD1 4HN<br />
Telephone Number 01382 635952 Email Address w.p.saunders@dundee.ac.uk<br />
The following documents must accompany the Part 2 Programme Proposal.<br />
Proposals that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> Have module proposal forms for each new module been submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Has a Programme Specification been completed <strong>and</strong> submitted with the Part 2? Yes<br />
> Is there evidence of support from at least one external adviser? Yes<br />
> Have the <strong>Academic</strong> Regulations (including progression, if not within the modular<br />
regulation structure) been clearly documented <strong>and</strong>/or appended?
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Approval of Part 2 Programme Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 14:30:06 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Advanced sciences in relation to Endodotology <strong>and</strong> integrated clinical endodontics<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2012<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2012/13 10 8 10<br />
2013/14 10 8 10<br />
2014/15 10 8 10
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This is a core module designed to ensure that all students have the knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the clinical basis of<br />
endodontics.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Institute of Dentistry:<br />
• Seminar room<br />
• AV facilities<br />
• Library access<br />
• IT facilities <strong>and</strong> support<br />
• USB Memory devices (encrypted)<br />
• Administration support<br />
• External speakers<br />
• 4 members of staff who are specialists in endodontics<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Advanced sciences in relation to Endodotology <strong>and</strong> integrated clinical endodontics<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
Basic Sciences in relation to<br />
Endodontology<br />
n/a<br />
n/a<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the clinical basis of endodontics <strong>and</strong> the interface with other aspects<br />
of dentistry. It will be conducted in the form of 38 seminars of 2 hours duration each, on alternate Wednesdays, covering:<br />
• Advances in pulp therapy<br />
• Outcome of endodontic treatment<br />
• Endodontic surgery<br />
• Inter-relationship of endodontics with periodontics, prosthodontics, orthodontics <strong>and</strong> paedodontics
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
• Adult dental trauma<br />
• Dental resorption<br />
• Odontogenic <strong>and</strong> non-odotogenic pain<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aims of this module are to:<br />
• Develop key learning from the introductory module (Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology)<br />
• Describe <strong>and</strong> discuss the academic aspects of endodontic practice with particular reference to root canal preparation <strong>and</strong><br />
obturation<br />
• Develop this knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing to facilitate appropriate endodontic treatment planning within the context of<br />
overall patient care<br />
• Develop knowledge of the interface between endodontics <strong>and</strong> other clinical dental modalities<br />
• Develop systematic problem solving strategies<br />
• Highlight strengths <strong>and</strong> limitations of available research.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
• The role of endodontics within complex treatment plans <strong>and</strong> other alternative treatment modalities<br />
• The assessment <strong>and</strong> summary of the strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses of the current research literature <strong>and</strong> clinical<br />
guidelines concerning evidence based endodontic practice, such as the Cochrane Library <strong>and</strong> the European<br />
Endodontic guidelines<br />
A 3<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
• Debate <strong>and</strong> analyse recent advances in pulp therapy, including outcomes of endodontic treatment, endodontic<br />
surgery, adult dental trauma, dental resorption <strong>and</strong> odontogenic <strong>and</strong> non-odontogenic pain<br />
• Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current endodontic literature<br />
• Demonstrate a commitment to continuing professional development<br />
Transferable skills - able to:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
• Participate collaboratively with the “classroom” process<br />
• Demonstrate communication skills appropriate to varying levels such as to individual patients, colleague groups <strong>and</strong><br />
conferences<br />
• Select <strong>and</strong> apply appropriate media to support presentations to individual patients, colleagues <strong>and</strong> groups <strong>and</strong><br />
conferences<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
• Apply this theoretical evidence base to both laboratory <strong>and</strong> clinic activity<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
• Pathways of the Pulp<br />
Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Publication date: May 2010<br />
ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />
• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />
Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />
Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />
ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />
• Endodontics<br />
Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />
ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />
• Seltzer <strong>and</strong> Bender’s Dental Pulp<br />
Editors:Kenneth M Hargreaves, Harold E Goodis<br />
Publisher: Quintessence Publishing Co,<br />
Publication date: May 2002<br />
ISBN:9780867154153<br />
• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />
Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />
Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />
Publishing Date: Nov 2007
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Edition: 2nd Edition<br />
ISBN: 1405149760<br />
• Roane J.B., Sabala C.L. <strong>and</strong> Duncanson M.G. (1985): The balanced force concept for instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of<br />
Endodontics 11: 203-211.<br />
• Saunders WP, Saunders EM. (1994) Comparison of three instruments in the preparation of the curved root canal using the<br />
modified double-flared technique. Journal of Endodontics 20(9):440-4.<br />
• Pettiette MT et al (2001) Evaluation of success rate of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless steel K-files<br />
<strong>and</strong> nickel titanium h<strong>and</strong> files. Journal of Endodontics 27: 124-127.<br />
• Lumley, P (2000) Cleaning efficiency of two apical preparation regimens following shaping with h<strong>and</strong> file of greater taper.<br />
International Endodontic Journal 33:262-5<br />
• Lussi A. et al (1993) A novel non-instrumented technique for cleansing the root canal system. Journal of Endodontics 19<br />
(11):549-53<br />
• Glosson C R et al (1995) A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti h<strong>and</strong>, Ni-Ti engine-driven <strong>and</strong> K-Flex endodontic<br />
instruments. Journal of Endodontics 21(3) P.146-151<br />
• Saunders E.M. (1990) In vivo findings associated with heat generation during thermomechanical compaction of Gutta Percha.<br />
Part 1 - Temperature levels at the external surface of the root. International Endodontic Journal 23(5): 263-267.<br />
Part 2 - Histological response to temperature elevation on the external surface of the root. International Endodontic Journal 13(5):<br />
268-274.<br />
• Buchanan LS (1998) Continuous wave of condensation technique. Endodontic Practice 1: 7-10<br />
• Friedman S, Stabholz A <strong>and</strong> Tamse A (1990) Endodontic retreatment - case selection <strong>and</strong> technique Part 3. Retreatment<br />
techniques. Journal of Endodontics 16 543-549.<br />
• Peterson J, Gutmann JL (2001) The outcome of endodontic resurgery: a systemic review. I International Endodontic Journal 34:<br />
169-175.<br />
• Walton R, Fouad A (1992) Endodontic inter-appointment flare-ups: a prospective study of incidence <strong>and</strong> related factors. Journal<br />
of Endodontics 18 (4) : 172 - 7. 7.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
76 hours student seminars<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
228 hours independent student study hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
304 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
4 literature reviews with given<br />
titles<br />
Written paper (A choice of 3<br />
questions out of 4)<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Coursework 2,000 words each 60% No n/a<br />
Examination 2.5 hours 40% Yes n/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 14:24:14 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Audit Project in Endodontic Practice<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2013/14 10 8 10<br />
2014/15 10 8 10<br />
2015/16 10 8 10
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This core module aims to build on students’ basic undergraduate competencies in clinical audit to a managerial level of audit<br />
skills. Students will have the opportunity of learning how clinical audit fits into the wider issue of clinical governance which is a<br />
key component of the NHS framework. In this core module of the Master of Science in Endodontic Practice, students will progress<br />
from underst<strong>and</strong>ing the key components of clinical audit to its role in the process of quality improvement to enhance patient<br />
care <strong>and</strong> outcomes. The purpose of the audit project is to provide an opportunity to investigate current practice in a chosen area<br />
of endodontic practice. The audit project will not only give the student real insight into the philosophy of audit but also the<br />
practical experience in managing the process of completing a piece of original work.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Access to classroom facilities <strong>and</strong> supervisors, library facilities <strong>and</strong> librarian<br />
support, audio-visual support for preparing <strong>and</strong> giving presentations<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Audit Project in Endodontic Practice<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
n/a n/a n/a<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
In this module, students will build on the principles of audit <strong>and</strong> clinical governance using current norms <strong>and</strong> protocols. The<br />
students will select an area of clinical endodontic practice, design a strategy for audit, collect the relevant data <strong>and</strong> analyse the<br />
findings. At the end of this module, the students will be required to produce a structured audit report of their project (minimum<br />
of 2,000 words), including recommendations for improvement of the clinical service <strong>and</strong> plans for re-audit. They will also be<br />
required to summarise their project in a PowerPoint presentation of 10-15 minutes’ duration, at a local, national or international<br />
meeting in endodontology or restorative dentistry. It is intended that the students will be guided throughout this process.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The audit project represents the culmination of the programme <strong>and</strong>, in line with the QMUL <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework Level 7<br />
expectations, with the aims to:<br />
• Enhance the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of clinical governance <strong>and</strong> clinical audit<br />
• Develop the ability to highlight problems in clinical service<br />
• Investigate current practice in a chosen area of endodontics<br />
• Develop skills in conducting a successful audit project<br />
• To carry out independent learning <strong>and</strong> problem-solving<br />
• Use clinical audit to ensure that clinical st<strong>and</strong>ards are being met to improve patient care<br />
• Improve team working <strong>and</strong> communication<br />
• Develop skills in oral <strong>and</strong> written presentations.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
• The importance of clinical audit <strong>and</strong> its different stages<br />
• The process of problem identification in clinical service <strong>and</strong> the setting of st<strong>and</strong>ard criteria<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
• Evaluate the evidence available on an aspect of endodontic practice by critical appraisal of the relevant scientific <strong>and</strong><br />
clinical literature<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
•Develop a systematic approach to the process of data collection <strong>and</strong> analysis<br />
• Present a report which provides insight into an audited aspect of endodontic practice<br />
• Demonstrate team working <strong>and</strong> communication
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
C 4<br />
• Self-reflection leading to the identification of training needs <strong>and</strong> personal strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
• Design an audit protocol <strong>and</strong> implement the audit to provide information about the effectiveness of a clinical service<br />
• Give effective oral presentations<br />
• Promote good clinical practice leading to the improvement of patient care<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Clinical Audit for Doctors 2009, Robert Ghosh<br />
http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/Documents/501/Practical_Clinical_Audit_H<strong>and</strong>book_v1_1.pdf<br />
A Practical H<strong>and</strong>book for Clinical Audit, Guidance published by the Clinical Governance Support Team. Graham Copel<strong>and</strong>.<br />
http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/clinauditChap1.pdf<br />
Clinical audit: what it is <strong>and</strong> what it isn’t
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
No more than 30 hours student supervision<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
At least 120 hours independent student study<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Written report Dissertation 2,000 words 60% Yes n/a<br />
Presentation of the project <strong>and</strong><br />
summary of the project as an<br />
interim assessment<br />
Coursework 30 minutes 20% No n/a<br />
Viva on audit project Coursework 30 minutes 20% Yes n/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 14:26:02 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 8 10<br />
2012/13 10 8 10<br />
2013/14 10 8 10
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This is a core module designed to ensure that all students have the knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the scientific basis of<br />
endodontolgy <strong>and</strong> the principles underpinning endodontic therapy.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Institute of Dentistry:<br />
• Seminar room<br />
• AV facilities<br />
• Library access<br />
• IT facilities <strong>and</strong> support<br />
• USB Memory devices (encrypted)<br />
• Administration support<br />
• External speakers<br />
• 4 members of staff who are specialists in endodontics<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Basic Sciences in relation to Endodontology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
n/a n/a n/a<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the basic science of endodontology. It will be conducted in the form<br />
of 38 sessions of 2 hours duration each, on alternate Wednesdays, covering:<br />
• Critical reading of literature<br />
• Diagnosis of pulpal <strong>and</strong> periapical disease<br />
• Access in relation to root canal anatomy <strong>and</strong> morphology<br />
• Endodontic instrumentation: rationale <strong>and</strong> techniques
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
• Obturation of the root canal system: rationale <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />
• Acute endodontic problems<br />
• Root canal re-treatment: rationale <strong>and</strong> techniques<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aims of this course module are to:<br />
• Reinforce the science associated with the pulp <strong>and</strong> periapical tissues<br />
• Develop a deeper underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the knowledge of the science associated with pulpal <strong>and</strong> periapical disease, scientific<br />
background of endodontics <strong>and</strong> the principles associated with endodontic treatment<br />
• Upgrade contemporary philosophies <strong>and</strong> research relating to endodontic treatment<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
• The anatomy of the pulp-dentinal complex <strong>and</strong> periapical tissues during health <strong>and</strong> disease<br />
• The various pathological processes, their impact on the pulpal <strong>and</strong> periapical tissues <strong>and</strong> the implications for<br />
endodontic treatment<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
• Evaluate <strong>and</strong> discuss the importance of evidence based dentistry<br />
• Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current endodontic literature<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
• Demonstrate collaborative communication principles at appropriate levels for various audiences (Lay <strong>and</strong><br />
professional)<br />
• Demonstrate skills of systematic analysis, synthesis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of their own research or advanced<br />
scholarship.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
• Employ appropriate media to support group presentations<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
• Pathways of the Pulp<br />
Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Publication date: May 2010<br />
ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />
• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />
Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />
Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />
ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />
• Endodontics<br />
Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />
ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />
• Seltzer <strong>and</strong> Bender’s Dental Pulp<br />
Editors:Kenneth M Hargreaves, Harold E Goodis<br />
Publisher: Quintessence Publishing Co,<br />
Publication date: May 2002<br />
ISBN:9780867154153<br />
• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />
Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />
Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />
Publishing Date: Nov 2007<br />
Edition: 2nd Edition<br />
ISBN: 1405149760<br />
• Oral Histology: Development, Structure, <strong>and</strong> Function<br />
Authors: Ten Cate AR.<br />
Publisher: Saint Louis: Mosby-Year Book<br />
Publishing Date: 1998<br />
Edition: 5th Edition<br />
ISBN 0-8151-2952-1.<br />
• Peters OA, Laib A, Ruegsegger P, Barbakow F (2000) Three-dimensional analysis of root canal geometry by high-resolution<br />
computed microtomography. Journal of Dental Research 79(6): 1405-1409.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
• Vertucci FJ (2005) Root canal morphology <strong>and</strong> its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic Topics 10: 3-29<br />
• Dummer PMH, McGinn JH, Rees DG (1984) The position <strong>and</strong> topography of the apical canal constriction <strong>and</strong> apical foramen.<br />
International Endodontic Journal 17(4): 192-198<br />
• Klevant FJH, Eggink CO (1983) The effect of canal preparation on periapical disease. International Endodontic Journal 68-75.<br />
• Bystrom A <strong>and</strong> Sundqvist G (1981) Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in<br />
endodontic therapy. Sc<strong>and</strong>inavian Journal of Dental Research 89 321-328.<br />
• Bystrom A <strong>and</strong> Sundqvist G (1983) Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5% NaoCl in endodontic therapy. Oral Surgery 55(3)<br />
307-312.<br />
• Bystrom A <strong>and</strong> Sundqvist G (1985) The antibacterial actions of sodium hypochlorite <strong>and</strong> EDTA in 60 cases of endodontic<br />
therapy. International Endodontic Journal 18 35-40.<br />
• Nair PNR, Henry S, Cano V, Vera J (2005) Microbial status of apical root canal system of human m<strong>and</strong>ibular first molars with<br />
primary apical periodontitis after “one-visit” endodontic treatment. Oral surgery,Oral medicine, Oral Pathology,Oral Radiology<br />
<strong>and</strong> Endodontology 99, 231-52<br />
• Kakehashi S, Stanley HR <strong>and</strong> Fitzgerald RJ (1965) The effects of surgical exposures<br />
dental pulps in germ free <strong>and</strong> conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surgery 20(3); 340-349.<br />
• Stashenko S, Teles R, D’Souza R (1998) Periapical inflammatory responses <strong>and</strong> their modulation. Critical Review of Oral Biology<br />
<strong>and</strong> Medicine 9 (4), 498-521.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
76 hours student seminars<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
228 hours independent student study hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
304 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
6 Timed essays with given titles Coursework 1 hour each 40% No n/a<br />
Written paper (A choice of 3<br />
questions out of 4)<br />
Examination 2.5 hours 60% Yes n/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 14:27:26 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Clinical skills in Endodontics<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2012<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2012/13 10 8 10<br />
2013/14 10 8 10<br />
2014/15 10 8 10
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This is a core module to give students exposure to a wide range of clinical cases including diagnosis, treatment planning,<br />
endodontic management <strong>and</strong> trouble-shooting.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Institute of Dentistry:<br />
• 5 fully operational dental chairs/bays<br />
• Materials <strong>and</strong> equipment as required<br />
• Nursing (4 nurses per clinic session)<br />
• administrative support for the course <strong>and</strong> clinics<br />
• testing <strong>and</strong> maintenance of equipment<br />
• 4 specialist endodontists for appropriate of clinical supervision <strong>and</strong> expertise<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Clinical skills in Endodontics<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
Preclinical Endodontic Skills n/a n/a<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This core module comprises of 25 clinical sessions of 4 hours duration each, allowing for 2 hours per patient resulting in<br />
treatment of approximately 8-10 patients in total by the end of this component.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aims of this module are to:<br />
• Develop clinical experience in the comprehensive management of patients including diagnosis, vital pulp therapy, non-surgical<br />
root canal treatment <strong>and</strong> re-treatment, non-vital bleaching <strong>and</strong> procedures related to coronal restorations by means of post <strong>and</strong>/<br />
or cores involving the root canal space<br />
• Encourage discussion of cases with the relevant supervising staff prior to the clinical session to devise a plan of treatment for<br />
that session<br />
• Encourage problem identification <strong>and</strong> solving<br />
• Encourage a team approach by working in pairs to assist each other, to maximise learning potential <strong>and</strong> to generate discussion<br />
on a broader range of ideas<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
• The analyis <strong>and</strong> review of clinical governance measures <strong>and</strong> methods of quality of care assurance<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
• Reflect upon <strong>and</strong> organise the practical skills gained in the laboratory for application to clinical situations<br />
• Recognise the need to identify instances where multidisciplinary planning <strong>and</strong> management of treatment is<br />
indicated so that clinical endodontic skills are provided within comprehensive oral care<br />
• Demonstrate self-awareness of <strong>and</strong> limits of personal expertise <strong>and</strong> when to seek support <strong>and</strong> advice from<br />
specialists, such as referral to a secondary/tertiary care centre (e.g. Barts & The London)<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
• Appreciate ethical dilemmas in treatment planning <strong>and</strong> evaluating alternative treatment approaches<br />
• Display professional attributes in relationships with patients <strong>and</strong> colleagues
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
• Demonstrate <strong>and</strong> apply sound, evidence based diagnostic <strong>and</strong> treatment planning skills to the provision of<br />
treatment plans <strong>and</strong> clinical care provided precisely <strong>and</strong> effectively<br />
• Provide patient based descriptions of root canal treatment <strong>and</strong> its range of outcomes<br />
• Assess an individual patient's tooth prognosis <strong>and</strong> strategic significance given local <strong>and</strong> systemic factors<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
• Pathways of the Pulp<br />
Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Publication date: May 2010<br />
ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />
• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />
Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />
Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />
ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />
• Endodontics<br />
Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />
ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />
• Seltzer <strong>and</strong> Bender’s Dental Pulp<br />
Editors:Kenneth M Hargreaves, Harold E Goodis<br />
Publisher: Quintessence Publishing Co,<br />
Publication date: May 2002<br />
ISBN:9780867154153<br />
• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />
Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />
Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />
Publishing Date: Nov 2007<br />
Edition: 2nd Edition<br />
ISBN: 1405149760<br />
• Harty’s Endodontics in clinical practice<br />
Edited by: T R Pitt Ford<br />
Publisher: Wright (Elsevier science)<br />
Publishing Date: 2004<br />
Edition: , 5th edition<br />
ISBN: 0723610894
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
• Textbook <strong>and</strong> color atlas of traumatic injuries to the teeth<br />
Edited by: J O Andreasen, Frances M Andreasen, Lars Andersson<br />
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell<br />
Publishing Date: May 2007<br />
Edition:5tthedition<br />
ISBN: 978-1-4051-2954-1<br />
• Color atlas of microsurgery in endodontics,<br />
Author: Syngcuk Kim , Gabriele Pecora, Richard A. Rubinstein<br />
Publisher:Saunders Company, W. B.<br />
Publishing date 2001<br />
Edition: 1st edition<br />
ISBN: 0-7216-4851-7<br />
• Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. I. Fractures <strong>and</strong> luxations of permanent teeth.Flores MT, Andersson<br />
L, Andreasen JO, Bakl<strong>and</strong> LK, Malmgren B, Barnett F, Bourguignon C, DiAngelis A, Hicks L, Sigurdsson A, Trope M, Tsukiboshi M,<br />
von Arx T; International Association of Dental Traumatology.Dental Traumatology 2007 Apr;23(2):66-71<br />
• Guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries. II. Avulsion of permanent teeth.<br />
Flores MT, Andersson L, Andreasen JO, Bakl<strong>and</strong> LK, Malmgren B, Barnett F, Bourguignon C, DiAngelis A, Hicks L, Sigurdsson A,<br />
Trope M, Tsukiboshi M, von Arx T; International Association of Dental Traumatology..Dental Traumatology. 2007 Jun;23(3):130-6<br />
• Wesselink PR (2000) Pulp capping with adhesive resin-based composite vs. calcium hydroxide: a review. Endodontics <strong>and</strong> Dental<br />
Traumatology 16: 240-50.<br />
• Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K..International<br />
Endodontic Journal. 2008 Dec;41(12):1026-46. Review.<br />
• Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - part 1. Effects of study characteristics on<br />
probability of success.Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K.. International Endodontic Journal. 2007 Dec;40<br />
(12):921-39.<br />
• Carnevale G, Pontoriero R, Febo G (1998) Long-term effects of resective therapy in furcation involved molars. Clinical<br />
Periodontology. 25, 209-14.<br />
• Hamilton RS, Gutman JL (1999) Endodontic - orthodontic relationships: a review of intergrated treatment planning challenges.<br />
International Endodontic Journal 32, 343-360.<br />
• Sjogren U, Hagglund, Sundqvist G <strong>and</strong> Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. Journal of<br />
Endodontics 16: 498-504.<br />
• Cvek M. <strong>and</strong> Lundberg M.:(1983) Histological Appearance of pulps after exposure by a crown fracture, partial pulpotomy <strong>and</strong><br />
clinical diagnosis of healing. J. Endo. 9: 8-11 . 6.<br />
• Nayyar A, Walton RE & Leonard LA (1980) An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel <strong>and</strong> core technique for endodontically treated<br />
posterior teeth. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 43(5): 511-515.<br />
• Sorensen J <strong>and</strong> Engelman MJ (1990) Ferrule design <strong>and</strong> fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Journal of Prosthetic<br />
Dentistry 63(5): 529-535.<br />
• Ray HA, Trope M (1995) Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling <strong>and</strong><br />
the coronal restoration. International Endodontic Journal 28: 12-18.<br />
• Saunders WP, Saunders EM (1994) Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root canal therapy. A review. Endodontics <strong>and</strong> Dental<br />
Traumatology 10: 105-108.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
• Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT (1985) Endodontically treated teeth as abutments. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 53: 631-636.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
100 hours supervised student clinical work<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
200 hours independent student study hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
300 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Patient case report Coursework 2,000 words 30% No n/a<br />
Patient case report viva Examination 30 minutes 20% Yes n/a<br />
Unseen case (simulated) Examination 30 minutes 30% Yes n/a<br />
Logbook of all patient cases Coursework Over 1 year 20% No n/a
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 14:28:36 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Literature Review in relation to Endodontic Practice<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 45 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2013/14 10 8 10<br />
2014/15 10 8 10<br />
2015/16 10 8 10
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This is a core module of the Master of Science in Endodontic Practice offered by the Institute of Dentistry. Critical appraisal of the<br />
literature is a fundamental skill necessary for clinicians to practice evidence-based dentistry <strong>and</strong> for those who are interested in<br />
conducting research in their future careers. In this module, the students will build on their competencies in searching, evaluating<br />
<strong>and</strong> critically appraising the scientific literature to identify weaknesses <strong>and</strong> strengths as well as contrasting the views of different<br />
authors. This will be with particular reference to the literature in a selected relevant aspect of the subject. At the end of this<br />
module, students will be required to produce a well-structured, unbiased <strong>and</strong> comprehensive literature review of current<br />
knowledge in the chosen area with the use of appropriate references. The purpose of the report is to provide an opportunity to<br />
investigate current practice in a chosen area of endodontics. The formulation of the report will encourage independent learning,<br />
an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of experimental methods <strong>and</strong> data interpretation, as well as enhance critical thinking <strong>and</strong> writing skills. It will<br />
provide practical experience in the process of completing a piece of original work, for possible publication or conference<br />
presentation.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Access to classroom facilities <strong>and</strong> supervisors, library facilities <strong>and</strong> librarian<br />
support<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Literature Review in relation to Endodontic Practice<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 45 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
n/a n/a n/a<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
In this module, the students will build on skills in conducting a detailed literature search <strong>and</strong> critical appraisal of the literature. It is<br />
intended that the subject for the report will be chosen by the students in a topic relevant to endodontic practice <strong>and</strong> is approved<br />
by the programme coordinator <strong>and</strong>/or a supervisory member of the academic or clinical staff at the institution. The students will<br />
be supported, advised <strong>and</strong> supervised throughout this module by a named supervisor. Guidance will be provided through<br />
tutorials <strong>and</strong> seminars, <strong>and</strong> presentations at journal club meetings. Students will be required to make a short presentation of the<br />
project in the course of the module as an interim assessment. At the end of this module, students will be required to use<br />
appropriate references to produce a well-structured, unbiased <strong>and</strong> comprehensive literature review report of no less than 10,000<br />
words.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The broad aims of this module are to:<br />
• Develop enhanced skills in conducting a detailed library-based research of the literature in a subject relevant to endodontic<br />
practice<br />
• Foster independent learning <strong>and</strong> problem-solving<br />
• Enhance underst<strong>and</strong>ing of experimental methods <strong>and</strong> data interpretation<br />
• Build on the ability to critically appraise the scientific <strong>and</strong> clinical literature in endodontic practice<br />
• Enhance the students’ ability to use the literature to support independent clinical practice by comparing <strong>and</strong> contrasting the<br />
views of different authors to arrive at an independent <strong>and</strong> unbiased conclusion<br />
• Reinforce writing skills <strong>and</strong> presentation skills<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
• the current literature on a topic within clinical endodontics<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
• Evaluate the evidence available on an aspect of endodontic practice by critical appraisal of the relevant scientific <strong>and</strong><br />
clinical literature<br />
• Synthesise information <strong>and</strong> rank the clinical evidence that is available<br />
• Present a clear, coherent, unbiased summary, discussion <strong>and</strong> conclusion of the current literature on a clinical<br />
endodontics topic<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
• Employ appropriate tools (search engines, web-based libraries, electronic documents etc) to conduct a detailed<br />
literature search<br />
• Present a well-written <strong>and</strong> reasoned report which provides an insight into the literature available in the selected<br />
topic<br />
• Work autonomously in planning <strong>and</strong> executing tasks at a professional level
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
• Give effective oral presentations<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
• Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine 2006 Wiley-Blackwell<br />
• Sackett D et al. Evidence Based Medicine: How to practice <strong>and</strong> teach EBM. 2000. Churchill-Livingstone.<br />
• Hall GM. How to Write a <strong>Paper</strong>. 3rd Edition. 2003. Wiley Blackwell.<br />
• Journal of Evidence-based Dentistry. Nature communication.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
No more than 50 hours student supervision activity<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
No less than 400 hours independent student study<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
450 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Written report Dissertation 10,000 words 60% Yes n/a<br />
Coursework- assessment of<br />
presentations of two papers at<br />
journal club meetings<br />
Project presentation <strong>and</strong> content<br />
summary - an interim<br />
assessment<br />
Coursework 1 hour 20% No n/a<br />
Coursework 30 minutes 10% No n/a<br />
Viva Coursework 30 minutes 10% Yes n/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 14:29:20 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Preclinical endodontic skills<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A400 Clinical Dentistry<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Endodontic Practice<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 8 10<br />
2012/13 10 8 10<br />
2013/14 10 8 10
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This is a coremodule to ensure that all students are competent in the practical skills necessary in carrying out endodontic<br />
treatment <strong>and</strong> managing endodontic problems.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Institute of Dentistry:<br />
• Postgraduate preclinical skills laboratory<br />
• Maintenance of supply of teaching materials<br />
• Maintenance <strong>and</strong> testing of relevant equipment<br />
• AV equipment<br />
• Support staff to manage <strong>and</strong> maintain the teaching laboratory<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Preclinical endodontic skills<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Nectaria Polycarpou/ / Rachel Tomson/ Dr S K Sidhu<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
n/a n/a n/a<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module is a practical module essential for the development of the skills required for competency in endodontic techniques.<br />
Students will need to demonstrate satisfactory completion of this module as a pre-requisite for the clinical module which follows<br />
this module. This component comprises of 50 sessions of 2 hours duration each, on alternate Wednesdays, covering:<br />
• endodontic techniques in a simulated root canal in a plastic block<br />
• endodontic techniques on extracted teeth.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aims of this module are to:<br />
• Describe the principles of endodontic instrumentation <strong>and</strong> obturation<br />
• Demonstrate rationales for using various instruments, techniques <strong>and</strong> materials<br />
• Develop reflective tools to evaluate personal performance <strong>and</strong> identify ways of improvement<br />
• Reflect the current evidence base <strong>and</strong> principles in technical aspects of endodontics<br />
• Describe <strong>and</strong> discuss options <strong>and</strong> approaches to managing technical difficulties in endodontics<br />
• Identify operative techniques most appropriate to each patient<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
• Methodologies for root canal preparation <strong>and</strong> obturation<br />
• Problem solving approaches to negotiating the complex anatomy of the root canal system, recognising the need for<br />
adaption of approaches to particular clinical situations <strong>and</strong> individual patient anatomy<br />
A 3<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
• Deliberate <strong>and</strong> resolve commonly occurring clinical problems<br />
• Critically evaluate their technical progress<br />
• Review <strong>and</strong> judge clinical evidence according to the quality of evidence.<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
• Adopt problem solving approaches<br />
• Assess their personal skills development, acknowledging the need for continued practical skills development
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
C 3<br />
• Recognise their own scope of practice <strong>and</strong> the need for supervisory support<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
• Identify <strong>and</strong> evaluate materials <strong>and</strong> equipment used for endodontic treatment<br />
• Consistently <strong>and</strong> competently practice safe, effective practical endodontic techniques applying as appropriate a<br />
range of manual (stainless steel/nickel titanium) <strong>and</strong> automated (stainless steel/nickel titanium) instruments for<br />
preparation of the root canal<br />
• Achieve consistency <strong>and</strong> competency in obturation of prepared curved canals using cold lateral condensation <strong>and</strong><br />
warm vertical compaction<br />
• Demonstrate the skills of being able to assess <strong>and</strong> carry out root canal re-treatment cases<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
• Pathways of the Pulp<br />
Authors: Stephen Cohen, Kenneth M Hargreaves<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Publication date: May 2010<br />
ISBN 10: 0323064892 ISBN 13: 9780323064897<br />
• Practical Clinical Endodontics<br />
Authors: Phillip Lumley, Nick Adams, Phillip Tomson<br />
Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences Churchill Livingstone<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2006<br />
ISBN10: 0443074828 ISBN13: 9780443074820<br />
• Endodontics<br />
Authors: Christopher J R Stock, Kishor Gulabivala, Richard T Walker<br />
Publisher: Mosby<br />
Edition: 3rd Revised edition<br />
Publication date: 31 Jan 2004<br />
ISBN10: 0723432031 ISBN13: 9780723432036<br />
• Essential Endodontology: Prevention And Treatment Of Apical Periodontitis<br />
Authors: Dag Orstavik, Thomas Pitt Ford<br />
Publisher: Blackwell Munksgaard<br />
Publishing Date: Nov 2007<br />
Edition: 2nd Edition<br />
ISBN: 1405149760<br />
• Harty’s Endodontics in clinical practice<br />
Edited by: T R Pitt Ford<br />
Publisher: Wright (Elsevier science)<br />
Publishing Date: 2004
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Edition: , 5th edition<br />
ISBN: 0723610894<br />
• Weine F.S., Kelly R.F., Lio P.J.: The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape <strong>and</strong> on apical foramen shape. Journal<br />
of Endodontics 1(8): 255-262<br />
• Mullaney T.P. (1979): Instrumentation of finely curved canals. Dental Clinics of North America. 12: 575-592.<br />
• Goerig A.C., Michelich R.J. <strong>and</strong> Shultz H.H (1982): Instrumentation of root canals in molar using the step down technique. Journal<br />
of Endodontics 8(12): 550-554.<br />
• Roane J.B., Sabala C.L. <strong>and</strong> Duncanson M.G. (1985): The balanced force concept for instrumentation of curved canals. Journal of<br />
Endodontics 11: 203-211.<br />
• Schilder H (1967): Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dental Clinics of North America. 723-744.<br />
• Yared GM <strong>and</strong> Dagher FEB (1994) Influence of apical enlargement on bacterial infection during treatment of apical periodontitis.<br />
Journal of Endodontics 20 (11) 535-537.<br />
• Coldero LG, McHugh S, MacKenzie D, Saunders WP (2002) Reduction in intracanal bacteria during root canal preparation with<br />
<strong>and</strong> without apical enlargement. International Endodontic Journal 35, 437-446.<br />
• Dummer P.M.H. (1992): Quality of root fillings in teeth obturated by lateral condensation of Gutta Percha or Thermafil<br />
obturators. International Endodontic Journal 25(1): 34.<br />
• Lussi A et al (2002) In vivo performance of the new non-instrumentation technology (NIT) canal obturation. International<br />
Endodontic Journal 35: 352<br />
• Siqueira J et al (1999) Mechanical reduction of the bacterial population of the root canal by 3 intstrumentation techniques.<br />
Journal of Endodontics 25: 332-335
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
100 hours supervised student laboratory work<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
200 hours independent student study hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
300 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Practical test (de novo) Practical 3 hours 50% Yes n/a<br />
Practical test (retreatment) Practical 3 hours 50% Yes n/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 116<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 14:30:50 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Programme Amendment(s)<br />
School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />
Programme Amendments:<br />
BSc Zoology with Aquatic Biology (C3C1) – resubmission<br />
BSc Zoology (C300) – resubmission<br />
BSc Psychology (C800) - resubmission<br />
Associated new Modules:<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Advanced Aquatic Biology – resubmission<br />
The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> the Origins or Morality<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
Three programme amendments :C3C1, C300 <strong>and</strong> C100 <strong>and</strong><br />
one associated module Advanced Aquatic Biology have been<br />
resubmitted following concerns raised by some students at<br />
the February PMAB meeting, in relation to the withdrawal of<br />
two modules (Freshwater Biology <strong>and</strong> Aquatic Ecosystems:<br />
Science, Policy Management) to be replaced by Advanced<br />
Aquatic Biology. The Programme amendment <strong>and</strong> the<br />
associate new Module have been significantly revised to<br />
address the issues raised by incorporating material from the<br />
withdrawn modules into SBC212 <strong>and</strong> into the new Advanced<br />
Aquatic Biology one. A meeting with students was organised<br />
by the Programme Director to discuss the proposed changes<br />
<strong>and</strong> the External Examiner was also consulted. Learning<br />
Outcomes have also been improved <strong>and</strong> updated programme<br />
specifications have been provided.<br />
BSc Zoology with Aquatic Biology (C3C1)<br />
The proposed amendment date is specified as September<br />
2010. This requires clarification.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
Programme Amendment Form<br />
This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />
the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />
• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />
necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />
• change in the length of the programme of study<br />
• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />
• changes in the programme regulations<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />
Programme Title(s) Zoology with Aquatic Biology<br />
Programme Code(s) C3C1<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />
Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Dr Jonathan Grey<br />
1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />
modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />
specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />
programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />
in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />
All modules in Level 5 will become compulsory.<br />
At Level 6, the following changes will be made:<br />
SBC316 Freshwater Biology will be withdrawn (withdrawal form submitted);<br />
SBC314 Aquatic Ecosystems: Science Policy & Management will be withdrawn from this programme;<br />
SBC611 Population & Chromosome Genetics, <strong>and</strong> SBS205 Parasites & Infectious Disease will be offered as elective modules;<br />
A new module SBC--- Advanced Aquatic Biology will be added to this programme (proposal form submitted);
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
SBS074 Investigative Project will be replaced by a new module SBS--- Aquatic Biology Investigative Project (proposal form<br />
submitted);<br />
SBS414 Zoology Research Project will be replaced by a new module SBS--- Aquatic Biology Research Project (proposal form<br />
submitted);<br />
If students do not elect to take the new Aquatic Biology Research Project, they must take SBC408 Turtles, Seals, Whales &<br />
Dolphins.<br />
SBS206 Project Skills in the Life Sciences will be removed as a level 6 elective.<br />
X<br />
Module Title<br />
Aquatic Biology Investigative<br />
Project<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
SBC---<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Add / Remove<br />
Module from<br />
Programme<br />
15 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />
X Aquatic Biology Research Project SBC--- 30 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />
X Advanced Aquatic Biology SBC--- 15 6 Compulsory 3 Add Module<br />
X Freshwater Biology SBC316 15 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />
X<br />
Aquatic Ecosystems: Science Policy<br />
& Management<br />
SBC314<br />
15 6 Compulsory 3 Remove Module<br />
X Population & Chromosome Genetics SBC611 15 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />
X Parasites & Infectious Disease SBS205 15 6 Elective 3 Add Module<br />
X Investigative Project SBS074 15 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />
X Zoology Research Project SBS414 30 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />
X Project Skills in the Life Sciences SBS206 30 6 Elective 3 Remove Module<br />
2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />
Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />
3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2010<br />
4) Rationale<br />
Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />
Due to a decline in student numbers, some programmes in the environmental area have now been withdrawn.<br />
In order to consolidate <strong>and</strong> increase teaching efficiency, material previously taught in SBC308 (module already withdrawn) <strong>and</strong><br />
SBC316/SBC314 has already been incorporated into SBC212 <strong>and</strong> will be merged further into the new module Advanced Aquatic<br />
Biology.<br />
The merger will also make better use of the field course facilities.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
The addition of projects in Aquatic Biology will be more appropriate for this programme of study.<br />
5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />
Usual teaching resources required, i.e. lecture rooms, teaching laboratories, computer rooms.<br />
6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />
proposed amendment(s)?<br />
No significant changes.<br />
Students will have slightly more choice in their 3rd year of study, especially those students that cannot afford the residential<br />
based field-courses run out of semester in overseas locations.<br />
7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />
Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />
please detail their comments.<br />
The external examiner, Prof. Mal Jones, was happy with the proposed changes <strong>and</strong> commented that he was "pleased to see a<br />
continuation of <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>'s long <strong>and</strong> well-regarded teaching of aquatic biology".<br />
Students on the C3C1 programme were invited to a meeting on the 3rd March 2011 with the Programme Director (Dr. Jon Grey)<br />
<strong>and</strong> Prof. Alan Hildrew to discuss the proposed changes to the programme. There were no objections raised at this meeting.<br />
Furthermore, none of the students have lodged any objections to the proposal since this meeting occurred.<br />
A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />
Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />
modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />
Yes<br />
> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />
amendment?<br />
Yes
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
Approval of Programme Amendment<br />
Programme<br />
Organiser*<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />
o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 11:21:37 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Advanced Aquatic Biology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
C100 Biology<br />
C300 Zoology<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 20 10 25
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences has recently withdrawn from a full undergraduate degree in Marine & Freshwater<br />
Biology <strong>and</strong> substituted the new C3C1 Zoology with Aquatic Biology code, which has inevitably led to a net loss in purely aquatic<br />
modules. Rationalization in teaching for efficiency (with the recent retirement of several key members of staff <strong>and</strong> imminent<br />
retirement of a professor) has meant the loss of individual, specialised modules. Aspects of Marine Biology (SBS308) <strong>and</strong><br />
Freshwater Biology (SBC316) have already been amalgamated into a holistic module encompassing the fundamentals of aquatic<br />
ecosystems at level 5: 'Aquatic Ecosystems: Structure <strong>and</strong> Function' (SBC212). To progress along the same vein, we wish to<br />
rationalise the remainder of SBC316 <strong>and</strong> 'Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management' (SBC314) with a new module.<br />
We propose a new 'Advanced Aquatic Biology' module designed specifically for students on the C3C1 (Zoology with Aquatic<br />
Biology) programme <strong>and</strong> which builds upon the fundamentals introduced via SBC212. Research <strong>and</strong> teaching of aquatic biology<br />
is perceived as a flagship specialization at QMUL, <strong>and</strong> we are proposing a cutting edge module with content reflecting hot topics<br />
of environmental <strong>and</strong> ecological issues in aquatic science. We will incorporate guest lectures from external environmental policy<br />
<strong>and</strong> management agencies, allowing direct contact with potential employers. Practical training will be via a week-long residential<br />
field-course.<br />
In addition to servicing C3C1, it will be offered as an optional module in programmes C100, C300, C1C8 <strong>and</strong> F850.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Lecture rooms<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
The field trip requires off-site accommodation <strong>and</strong> laboratory facilities as well as<br />
excellent access to marine <strong>and</strong> freshwater sites. This can be supplied by the Field<br />
Studies <strong>Council</strong>'s centre at Dale Fort in Wales, which we have used for residential<br />
field courses of this nature many times before.<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Advanced Aquatic Biology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Andrew G. Hirst<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
Aquatic Ecosystems: Structure <strong>and</strong><br />
Function SBC212<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
The module will address advanced aspects of aquatic environments <strong>and</strong> the organisms inhabiting these. It will identify the<br />
biological adaptations of aquatic taxa, factors controlling their community composition <strong>and</strong> ecosystem functioning. Global<br />
patterns of organismal <strong>and</strong> ecosystem rates (including the influence of body size, temperature <strong>and</strong> seasonality), <strong>and</strong> population<br />
processes of mortality, feeding <strong>and</strong> predator-prey size ratios will all be considered. There will be a compulsory one week-long<br />
field trip, which will give h<strong>and</strong>s-on experience of sampling <strong>and</strong> studying the ecology of organisms in their environment. Aspects<br />
of environmental change, policy <strong>and</strong> management will also be considered.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The module aims to provide level 6 students with advanced knowledge of:<br />
1. the physical <strong>and</strong> biotic factors that govern the distribution <strong>and</strong> success of marine <strong>and</strong> freshwater organisms.<br />
2. the ecology of aquatic organisms with respect to productivity, seasonality <strong>and</strong> their physico-chemical environments.<br />
3. the adaptations organisms have across a range of aquatic habitats (including morphology, behaviour <strong>and</strong> life-cycle<br />
characteristics).<br />
4. how in freshwaters (i.e. lakes, groundwaters, rivers <strong>and</strong> streams) organisms are integrally linked to their general geological<br />
l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />
5. practical skills in surveying, field data collection <strong>and</strong> reporting <strong>and</strong> interpretation of environmental data from aquatic<br />
environments.<br />
6. how to access information on current policy making <strong>and</strong> management practice (with guest lectures from industry, agencies<br />
<strong>and</strong> potential employers), including an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the European Water Framework Directive.<br />
The over-arching aim of this module is to provide the student with an advanced underst<strong>and</strong>ing of aquatic organisms within their<br />
environment, within an ecological <strong>and</strong> evolutionary context.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
A4<br />
A5<br />
A6<br />
the physical <strong>and</strong> biotic environment <strong>and</strong> its influence on the ecology of aquatic organisms.<br />
the primary principles underlying the distribution <strong>and</strong> production of aquatic organisms.<br />
the purpose of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD).<br />
differentiating between natural <strong>and</strong> modified l<strong>and</strong>scapes <strong>and</strong> their respective interaction with the aquatic fauna <strong>and</strong> flora.<br />
contemporary issues of global concern in aquatic environments, specifically environmental change, pollution, ocean<br />
acidification <strong>and</strong> invasive species.<br />
how to choose appropriate sampling methods for different aquatic taxa <strong>and</strong> environments (e.g. nets versus water bottles,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the rise of modern technologies for environmental assessment).<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
design <strong>and</strong> implement a field based research project (i.e. be able to derive hypotheses, design methods to test these).<br />
produce critical scientific reports (based on a field based project) that are coherent, making reference to the most recent<br />
science literature, <strong>and</strong> following the presentation styles of rigorous scientific writing.<br />
to critically assess the science <strong>and</strong> policy driving the European Water Framework Directive (WFD)<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
identify aquatic animals <strong>and</strong> plants inhabiting a range of salinities.<br />
discuss <strong>and</strong> appraise the suitability of sampling techniques required for quantitatively assessing numbers, types of<br />
organisms <strong>and</strong> population differences across a range of aquatic environments.<br />
design an appropriate sampling programme when given a specific set of objectives in a field situation.<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
communicate complex scientific ideas in written <strong>and</strong> verbal forms.<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Marine:<br />
1. Miller, C.B. 2004. Biological Oceanography. 1st Edition. Blackwell Publishing.<br />
2. Kiorboe, T. 2008. A mechanistic approach to plankton ecology. 1st Edition. Princeton University Press.<br />
3. Longhurst A. 1998. Ecological geography of the sea. <strong>Academic</strong> Press.<br />
4. Barnes, R.D. & Ruppert, E.E. 1994. Invertebrate Zoology. 6th Edition. Saunders College Publishing.<br />
5. Campbell, A. 1996. Hamlyn Guide Seashores <strong>and</strong> Shallow Seas.<br />
Freshwater:<br />
1. Kalff, J. 2002. Limnology. Pearson Education, Prentice Hall, 592pp.<br />
2. Wetzel, R.G. 2001. Limnology. <strong>Academic</strong> Press, 1066.<br />
3. Jones, J.B. & Mulholl<strong>and</strong>, P.J. 2000. Streams <strong>and</strong> Ground Waters. <strong>Academic</strong> Press, San Diego.<br />
Current literature will be consistently referred to in the lectures in order to provide cutting edge supplementary information <strong>and</strong><br />
the latest policy <strong>and</strong> management documentation available from stakeholders/end users provided via the invited external<br />
speakers.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures (22 hours), field trip (6 days - 8 hour days)<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
80 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Examination by essay Examination 3 hours 75% Yes 35%<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
Course work<br />
Coursework<br />
24 hours (field<br />
work)<br />
25% Yes 35%<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 117<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />
o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 11:15:43 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 118<br />
Programme Amendment Form<br />
This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />
the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />
• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />
necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />
• change in the length of the programme of study<br />
• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />
• changes in the programme regulations<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />
Programme Title(s) Zoology<br />
Programme Code(s) C300<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />
Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Prof Maurice Elphick<br />
1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />
modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />
specified. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the programme(s) should<br />
be provided in the table below.<br />
Withdraw level 6 modules SBC314 Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Policy & Management; SBC316 Freshwater Biology.<br />
Add level 6 module Advanced Aquatic Biology (module proposal submitted)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 118<br />
Module Title<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Semester<br />
X Advanced Aquatic Biology SBC--- 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />
X<br />
2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />
Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />
3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011<br />
4) Rationale<br />
Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />
Due to a decline in student numbers, some programmes in the environmental area have now been withdrawn. In order to<br />
consolidate <strong>and</strong> increase teaching efficiency, material previously taught in SBC308 (module already withdrawn) <strong>and</strong> SBC316/<br />
SBC314 will be merged into the new module Advanced Aquatic Biology. The merger will also make better use of the field course<br />
facilities.<br />
5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />
No implications apart from appropriate lecture room facilities.<br />
6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />
proposed amendment(s)?<br />
No significant changes. Students will still be required to attend a field course prior to the beginning of their third year of study.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 118<br />
7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />
Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />
please detail their comments.<br />
A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />
Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />
modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />
Yes<br />
> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />
amendment?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Programme Amendment<br />
Programme<br />
Organiser*<br />
Maurice<br />
Elphick<br />
Digitally signed by Maurice Elphick<br />
DN: cn=Maurice Elphick, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong><br />
University of London, ou=School of<br />
Biolological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences,<br />
email=M.R.Elphick@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2010.11.12 11:37:13 Z<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />
o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.02.02 13:14:36 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
Programme Amendment Form<br />
This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />
the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />
• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />
necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />
• change in the length of the programme of study<br />
• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />
• changes in the programme regulations<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />
Programme Title(s) BSc Psychology<br />
Programme Code(s) C800<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />
Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
Institute of Health Sciences Education<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
None<br />
Programme Organiser Dr Qazi Rahman<br />
1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />
modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />
specified. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the programme(s) should<br />
be provided in the table below.<br />
We are proposing to enhance the coherence <strong>and</strong> subject-content of this programme by:<br />
- removing SBC343 Genes <strong>and</strong> Human Behaviour - see attached module withdrawal form
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
- adding a new module "The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> Origins of Morality" - see attached module proposal form.<br />
The spirit behind this change is to capitalise on the research expertise of new psychology staff in the SBCS to deliver research-led<br />
teaching at the final year of the degree programme. This amendment is in line with the College strategy to enhance research-led<br />
teaching.<br />
We are also requesting to move one module (Animal Cognition) from semester B to semester A of year 3 (see attached module<br />
update form).<br />
Module Title<br />
The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong><br />
Origins of Morality<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of Study<br />
Semester<br />
tbc 15 6 Elective 3 Semester 2<br />
2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />
Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />
N/A<br />
3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011<br />
4) Rationale<br />
Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />
See above under section 1<br />
5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />
None
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />
proposed amendment(s)?<br />
Students have been consulted <strong>and</strong> indicate approval of the changes<br />
7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />
Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />
please detail their comments.<br />
The external psychology advisor (Prof. Verity Brown) has been consulted <strong>and</strong> supports the above changes.<br />
A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />
Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />
modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />
Yes<br />
> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />
amendment?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Programme Amendment<br />
Programme<br />
Organiser*<br />
Qazi<br />
Rahman<br />
Digitally signed by Qazi Rahman<br />
DN: cn=Qazi Rahman, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong> University of London,<br />
ou=SBCS, email=q.rahman@qmul.<br />
ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.02.22 15:31:30 Z<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />
o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 11:19:33 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> the Origins of Morality<br />
Module Code TBA<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date January 2012<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
C800, C820, C890<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
None<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
None<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
School of Biological & Chemical Sciences<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 60 None None<br />
2012/13 60 None None
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This will be an optional third year module for the BSc (Honours) Psychology programme. Module is not available to intercalating<br />
students. It will capitalize on the research expertise of new psychology staff in the SBCS, adding a new <strong>and</strong> exciting topic area to<br />
the programme, enhancing compliance with British Psychological Society (BPS) requirements for the teaching of developmental<br />
psychology, <strong>and</strong> allow research being conducted in the Biological <strong>and</strong> Experimental Psychology Group to feed directly into<br />
teaching of the psychology programme.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Appropriate teaching <strong>and</strong> examination facilities are already present for SBCS<br />
programmes.<br />
None<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title The Psychology of Sociality <strong>and</strong> the Origins of Morality<br />
Module Code TBA<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Keith Jensen<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
To provide psychology students with a scientific overview of sociality <strong>and</strong> morality. This supports the distinctiveness of QMUL<br />
psychology as a natural <strong>and</strong> experimental science with a strong evolutionary thrust to generating predictions about<br />
psychological phenomena. Furthermore, it will build on student knowledge of developmental, comparative <strong>and</strong> social<br />
psychology. Students will be introduced to empirical findings <strong>and</strong> theories <strong>and</strong> will critically evaluate these. Topics covered will<br />
include moral developmental, moral sentiments <strong>and</strong> emotions, moral reasoning, neurology <strong>and</strong> endocrinology of social decision<br />
making, economic <strong>and</strong> game theoretical approaches, evolution <strong>and</strong> the psychology of social living, as well as cultural <strong>and</strong><br />
normative influences on social preferences <strong>and</strong> cultural group selection. Antisocial as well as prosocial aspects of human <strong>and</strong><br />
animal sociality will be discussed.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
1. To provide an overview of moral psychology <strong>and</strong> human sociality from an evolutionary perspective.<br />
2. To use developmental, comparative, economic <strong>and</strong> cross-cultural approaches to broaden our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the essence of<br />
humanity.<br />
3. To challenge conventional (rational) views of social decision making <strong>and</strong> consider the role of emotions <strong>and</strong> social concerns.<br />
4. To provide experience with critically evaluating empirical <strong>and</strong> theoretically works <strong>and</strong> to present these ideas <strong>and</strong> discuss them<br />
with peers.<br />
5. To comply with BPS requirements to cover teaching of developmental psychology.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
how moral behaviour develops from classical (Piagetian, Vygotskian, Kohlbergian) perspectives, as well as modern<br />
ones.<br />
the role of emotions <strong>and</strong> moral sentiments in guiding social behaviour.<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
consider the role of evolution <strong>and</strong> culture in shaping fundamentally important social behaviours.<br />
compare humans to other animals as a way of probing the nature of sociality.<br />
use game theoretical <strong>and</strong> economic approaches to make predictions about rational behaviour.<br />
critically evaluate the selective pressures that may have shaped a uniquely human cognitive ability.<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
critically appraise the empirical <strong>and</strong> theoretical literature, <strong>and</strong> thus develop skills of critique, evaluation <strong>and</strong><br />
assessment of different sources of information.<br />
present <strong>and</strong> defend ideas to peers <strong>and</strong> thus enhance the development of presentation skills.<br />
sustain intellectual discussion, thus enhance the development of oral communication <strong>and</strong> argument formation <strong>and</strong><br />
delivery skills.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
C 4<br />
write coherent <strong>and</strong> integrated syntheses of a complex topic that transcends traditional disciplines.<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
None<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Doris, J. M. (2010). The Moral Psychology H<strong>and</strong>book. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />
Hauser, M. (2006). Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right <strong>and</strong> Wrong. Ecco, NY: Harper Collins.<br />
Prinz, J. J. (2009). The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
22 hours (lectures)<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
128 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Coursework essay Coursework N/A 20% Yes U40A<br />
Class participation activities Coursework N/A 20% Yes U40A<br />
Exam (3 out of 7 essay questions) Examination 3 hours 60% Yes U40A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Resit examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
Digitally signed by Prof Peter<br />
Heathcote<br />
DN: cn=Prof Peter Heathcote,<br />
o=SBCS, ou=QMUL, email=sbcshead@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 11:16:33 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 119<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Programme Amendment(s)<br />
School of Electronic Eng. <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />
BSc Computer Science & Mathematics (GG41)<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
The programme amendment requires signature by the Head<br />
of School.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 120<br />
Programme Amendment Form<br />
This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />
the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />
• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />
necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />
• change in the length of the programme of study<br />
• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />
• changes in the programme regulations<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />
Programme Title(s) Computer Science & Mathematics<br />
Programme Code(s) GG41<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Bachelor of Science (BSc) Full Time 3 <strong>Academic</strong> Years<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Dr Graham White<br />
1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />
modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />
specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />
programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />
in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />
Remove optional modules:<br />
- DCS235 Software Engineering <strong>and</strong> replace with DCS 234 “Software Engineering Theory”<br />
- DCS310 Systems Analysis from semesters 3 <strong>and</strong> 5<br />
- DCS219 Specification <strong>and</strong> Reasoning (this has not been offered since 2006)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 120<br />
Module Title<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Add / Remove<br />
Module from<br />
Programme<br />
X Software Engineering DCS235 30 5 Elective 2 Remove Module<br />
X Systems Analysis DCS310 15 5 Elective 2 Remove Module<br />
X Specification <strong>and</strong> Reasoning DCS219 15 5 Elective 2 Remove Module<br />
X Software Engineering Theory DCS234 15 5 Elective 2 Add Module<br />
2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />
Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />
3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011<br />
4) Rationale<br />
Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />
In response to a syllabus review by the School of Mathematical Sciences in the light of the <strong>Academic</strong> Credit Framework, we have<br />
reviewed the programme offered by EECS. Feedback <strong>and</strong> student results suggest that these joint programme students are<br />
inadequately prepared for the Software Engineering group project (semester 2 of the 30-credit DCS235 Software Engineering).<br />
However, we wish to continue to offer the students a basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of Software Engineering through the 15-credit DCS234<br />
Software Engineering Theory, especially since this has been requested by several students this year. Since the students are no<br />
longer undertaking the full DCS235 Software Engineering, they do not need to take DCS310 Systems Analysis. The dropping of<br />
DCS219 Specification <strong>and</strong> Reasoning simply reflects a change in EECS core provision.<br />
We believe that these changes streamline the programme, which will be to the students' benefit. We continue to offer a sufficient<br />
variety of modules to ensure regulatory conformance with the programme title <strong>and</strong> meet the expectations of students <strong>and</strong><br />
employers.<br />
5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />
None.<br />
6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />
proposed amendment(s)?<br />
No affect on study patterns. The students have not been formally consulted, although informal feedback suggests that the<br />
students are happy with the proposed changes relating to Software Engineering.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 120<br />
7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />
Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />
please detail their comments.<br />
No.<br />
A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />
Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />
modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />
N/A<br />
> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />
amendment?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Programme Amendment<br />
Programme<br />
Organiser*<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Programme Amendment(s)<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London SMD<br />
MSc Oral Biology <strong>and</strong> the following associated module<br />
proposals:<br />
Introduction to Oral Biology<br />
Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
Introduction to Oral Biology<br />
Total module notional study hours are specified as 162 hours.<br />
Typically a 15 credit module would comprise of 150 hours.<br />
The Board may wish to explore this.<br />
Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />
Total module notional study hours are specified as 162 hours.<br />
Typically a 15 credit module would comprise of 150 hours.<br />
The Board may wish to explore this.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Programme Amendment Form<br />
This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />
the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />
• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />
necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />
• change in the length of the programme of study<br />
• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />
• changes in the programme regulations<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />
Programme Title(s) MSc Oral Biology<br />
Programme Code(s)<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Master of Science (MSc) Full Time 1 Calendar Year<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Programme Organiser Dr Paul Anderson<br />
1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />
modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />
specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />
programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />
in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />
It is proposed to split the current 30 credit Module entitled Introduction to Oral Biology into two 15 credit modules.<br />
Thus the current 30 credit Introduction to Oral Biology Module is to be removed<br />
This will be replaced by:<br />
Introduction to Oral Biology (15 credit module)<br />
Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues (15 credit module)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Module Title<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Add / Remove<br />
Module from<br />
Programme<br />
X Introduction to Oral Biology 30 7 Core 1 Remove Module<br />
X Introduction to Oral Biology 15 7 Core 1 Add Module<br />
X<br />
Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental<br />
Tissues<br />
15 7 Core 1 Add Module<br />
2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />
Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />
3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction Sep 2011<br />
4) Rationale<br />
Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />
The Introduction to Oral Biology Module is a core module in the MSc in Oral Biology.<br />
The rationale for splitting the 30 credit Introduction to Oral Biology module <strong>and</strong> create two 15 credit modules is to allow<br />
flexibility for use of the two modules by other MSc programs which may only require the new Introduction to Oral Biology 15<br />
credit module. The MSc in Oral Biology course will now have both the Introduction to Oral Biology , <strong>and</strong> Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of<br />
Dental Tissues as core modules.<br />
5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />
The Introduction to Oral Biology Module will be taken by a larger number of students including the MSc in Oral Biology students<br />
(currently 21). The additional student numbers that take this module on other MSc programs will mean that a larger teaching<br />
space is required than that currently used. The host Dept. (Oral Growth <strong>and</strong> Development) does not have a sufficiently large<br />
teaching room to cope with more students. Therefore, a resource implication is teaching space.<br />
Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues module is unaffected.<br />
6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />
proposed amendment(s)?<br />
N/A
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />
Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />
please detail their comments.<br />
N/A<br />
A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />
Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />
modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />
Yes<br />
> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />
amendment?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Programme Amendment<br />
Programme<br />
Organiser*<br />
Paul<br />
Anderson<br />
Digitally signed by Paul Anderson<br />
DN: cn=Paul Anderson, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Dental Physical Sciences,<br />
email=p.<strong>and</strong>erson@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.01 10:27:41 Z<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 13:58:01 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Introduction to Oral Biology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A200<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Oral Biology<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 12 6 25<br />
2012/13 12 6 25<br />
2013/14 12 6 25
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module is a core module of the MSc in Oral Biology. The module is designed so that students have the basic knowledge of<br />
oral biology, both hard <strong>and</strong> soft tissues required for the later modules in the Oral Biology MSc <strong>and</strong> the Dental Materials MSc<br />
courses.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Seminar Room, AV facilities. (SEMS)<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Introduction to Oral Biology<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Sahar Mohsin <strong>and</strong> Dr Simon Rawlinson<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the introduction to the basic <strong>and</strong> clinical sciences of the dental hard<br />
<strong>and</strong> soft tissues <strong>and</strong> the biochemical processes processes relevant of Oral Biology.<br />
It will be conducted in the form of 12 seminars of 3 hour duration, <strong>and</strong> 6 research seminars.<br />
The major topics include:<br />
• Tooth development <strong>and</strong> mechanisms driving formation<br />
• Structure of enamel<br />
Structure of dentine<br />
Structure of bone<br />
Structure of the periodontal ligament<br />
Dental anomalies
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Lecture List:<br />
1. Tooth Development & Signalling Pathways<br />
2. Enamel<br />
a. Structure<br />
b. Development<br />
c. In relation to Restorative Procedures<br />
3. Dentine <strong>and</strong> the Dentine-Pulp Complex<br />
a. Dentine Formation (Dentinogenesis)<br />
b. Dentine Structure<br />
c. Dental Pulp<br />
d. Clinical correlations of Dentine- Pulp Structure<br />
e. Root Development <strong>and</strong> Cementogenesis<br />
4. Bone <strong>and</strong> Bone Remodelling<br />
a. Bone Histology<br />
b. Reactions of Bone to stress<br />
c. The Cellular Basis of Bone Remodelling Diseases<br />
5. Periodontal Ligament<br />
a. Tooth Support Mechanisms<br />
b. Dentogingival Junction; Clinical Aspects<br />
6. Dental anomalies<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This module will:-<br />
a) provide an overview of the scope of oral biology <strong>and</strong> its role in the practice of dentistry.<br />
b) improve an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the biological basis of oral phenomenon, whether normal or pathological.<br />
c) enhance an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how oral biological knowledge is acquired <strong>and</strong> how growth of such knowledge leads to a high<br />
quality of dental care.<br />
d) demonstrate how Oral Biology forms the basis for preventive dentistry clinical procedures.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
Development of the structures of the oro-dental tissues.<br />
Histological <strong>and</strong> physiological aspects of bone remodelling<br />
A 3
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
A 4<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong> how the microscopic structures enable the gross anatomical structure <strong>and</strong> function<br />
Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current oral biology literature<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Evaluate <strong>and</strong> discuss the importance of evidence based dentistry<br />
Demonstrate collaborative communication principles at appropriate levels for various audiences (Lay <strong>and</strong><br />
professional)<br />
C 3<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
Employ appropriate media to support group presentations<br />
Demonstrate skills of systematic analysis, synthesis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of their own research or advanced<br />
scholarship<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Oral BioSciences by DB Ferguson; Churchill Livingstone ISBN 0443053731.<br />
Oral Anatomy, Histology <strong>and</strong> Embryology by BKB Berkovitz, GR Holl<strong>and</strong>, BJ Moxham. ISBN 0723431817<br />
~-~-<br />
-~ Master Dentistry Volume 3: Oral Biology BKB Berkovitz, BJ Moxham, R.W.A. Linden, A.J. Sloan ISBN 978-0-702-03122-9
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
All lectures ran as interactive seminars. Lecturer will introduce broad<br />
academic aims, then give examples of research related to those<br />
academic aims. Each lecture seminar lasts 3 hours.<br />
Total: 36 h<br />
In addition, there are 3 2h research seminars<br />
Total: 42 h<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Students to spend at 6 hours study per seminar.<br />
Total 72 hours<br />
In addition, students set 1 formative <strong>and</strong> 1 summative essays<br />
24 hours per essay.<br />
Total 120h<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
162 h<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Written paper<br />
Section A 40 % 4 short questions<br />
Section B 60% 3 long questions<br />
out of choice of 6<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Examination 2.5h 70 Yes 50<br />
1 Essay Coursework 2500 words 30 Yes 50<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 13:56:41 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
A200 Pre-clinical Dentistry<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Barts <strong>and</strong> The London School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Oral Biology<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 12 6 25<br />
2012/13 12 6 25<br />
2013/14 12 6 25
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module is a core module of the MSc in Oral Biology. The module is designed so that students have the basic knowledge of<br />
oral biology, both hard <strong>and</strong> soft tissues, <strong>and</strong> novel laboratory methods for their study, required for the later modules in the<br />
course.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Seminar Room, AV facilities.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Use <strong>and</strong> Investigation of Dental Tissues<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Sahar Mohsin <strong>and</strong> Dr Simon Rawlinson<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module is an academic module focussing primarily on the introduction to the basic sciences <strong>and</strong> biochemical processes of<br />
the oral soft tissues, salivary gl<strong>and</strong>s,, the structures of the skull relevant t o Oral Biology how the hard <strong>and</strong> soft tissues are<br />
involved in mastication, <strong>and</strong> finally an introduction to a wide variety of advanced laboratory methods used in modern Oral<br />
Biology research<br />
It will be conducted in the form of 12 seminars of 3 hour duration, <strong>and</strong> 6 research seminars.<br />
The major topics include:<br />
• Oral mucosa development, <strong>and</strong> pathology<br />
Salivary gl<strong>and</strong>s
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Lecture List<br />
1. Oral Mucosa<br />
Pathophysiology of oral diseases<br />
2. Salivary Gl<strong>and</strong>s<br />
a. Structure & Function<br />
b. Salivary Secretion & autonomic control<br />
c. Formation of Saliva<br />
3. Osteology Skull<br />
a. Skull, Neurocranium, Base<br />
b. Maxilla & M<strong>and</strong>ible<br />
c. Face & Palate<br />
4. Mastication<br />
5. Introduction to Investigative Techniques in Oral Biology<br />
a: NMR/ESR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance/ Electron Spin Resonance<br />
b: Synchrotron techniques<br />
c. X-Ray Diffraction<br />
d: Imaging<br />
e: Chemical analyses<br />
f: Electron Microscopy<br />
g: optical microscopies including confocal microscopy<br />
h: biochemical methods<br />
i: Cell culture techniques<br />
j: microtomography<br />
k: scanning microradiography<br />
(12 lectures)<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This module will:-<br />
a) provide an overview of the scope of oral biology <strong>and</strong> its role in the practice of dentistry.<br />
b) improve an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the biological basis of oral phenomenon, whether normal or pathological.<br />
c) enhance an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how oral biological knowledge is acquired <strong>and</strong> how growth of such knowledge leads to a high<br />
quality of dental care.<br />
d) demonstrate how oral biology forms the basis for preventive dentistry clinical procedures.<br />
e) introduce methods for Oral Biology research<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
Structure of the skull supporting the dentition<br />
Salivary gl<strong>and</strong>s structure <strong>and</strong> salivary secretion<br />
Anatomy <strong>and</strong> physiology of mastication<br />
Modern laboratory techniques in Oral Biology research<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong> how the microscopic structures enable the gross anatomical structure <strong>and</strong> function<br />
Develop <strong>and</strong> apply strategies to criticise <strong>and</strong> evaluate the current oral biology literature<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Discuss options for the use modern laboratory techniques in Oral Biology research<br />
Demonstrate collaborative communication principles at appropriate levels for various audiences (Lay <strong>and</strong> professiona<br />
C 3<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
Employ appropriate media to support group presentations<br />
Demonstrate skills of systematic analysis, synthesis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of their own research or advanced<br />
scholarship<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Oral BioSciences by DB Ferguson; Churchill Livingstone ISBN 0443053731.<br />
Oral Anatomy, Histology <strong>and</strong> Embryology by BKB Berkovitz, GR Holl<strong>and</strong>, BJ Moxham. ISBN 0723431817<br />
Master Dentistry Volume 3: Oral Biology BKB Berkovitz, BJ Moxham, R.W.A. Linden, A.J. Sloan ISBN 978-0-702-03122-9
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
All lectures ran as interactive seminars. Lecturer will introduce broad<br />
academic aims, then give examples of research related to those<br />
academic aims. Each lecture seminar lasts 3 hours.<br />
Total: 36 h<br />
In addition, there are 3 research seminars Total: 6 h<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Students to spend at 6 hours study per seminar.<br />
Total 72 hours<br />
In addition, students set 1 formative <strong>and</strong> 1 summative essays<br />
24 hours per essay. Total 48h<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
162 h<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Written paper<br />
Section A 40 % 4 short questions<br />
Section B 60% 3 long questions<br />
out of choice of 6<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Examination 2.5h 70 Yes 50<br />
1 Essay Coursework 2500 words 30 Yes 50<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 13:58:39 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 121<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Module Proposal<br />
School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Econometrics C<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
The duration of the midterm test(s) is specified as TBA. Can<br />
this be clarified?
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Econometrics C<br />
Module Code ECOM033<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
L140 Econometrics<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
N/A<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
N/A<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Economics PG<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 12 3 30
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The module is being introduced to provide an advanced econometrics track in Semester 2 for MSc students intending to pursue<br />
doctoral study. That is to say, Econometrics A in Semester 1 can be followed by either Econometrics B (an existing module) or<br />
Econometrics C (the new module).<br />
Econometrics C will be compulsory for students on the MSc Economics (L1S1/L1SP) programme, <strong>and</strong> an option for students on<br />
the Finance <strong>and</strong> Economics (L1T3/L1T4) <strong>and</strong> Finance <strong>and</strong> Econometrics (L1S5/L1S9) programmes.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
One teaching room <strong>and</strong> one lecturer to teach.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
N/A<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Econometrics C<br />
Module Code ECOM033<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Professor Emmanuel Guerre<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
ECOM003 Econometrics A<br />
ECOM032 Econometrics B<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
The purpose of this module is to equip students with the probabilistic <strong>and</strong> statistical tools necessary to undertake research in<br />
econometrics <strong>and</strong> to cover a number of important topics in this field. The module starts with a review of large sample theory, <strong>and</strong><br />
then proceeds to analyze the asymptotic behavior of extremum estimators, including maximum likelihood <strong>and</strong> generalized<br />
methods of moments. Some important efficiency results will be covered. Finally, the module will deal with panel data, limited<br />
dependent variables, unit roots, <strong>and</strong> cointegration.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The purpose of the module is to provide a rigorous foundation in econometrics for students wishing to undertake theoretical or<br />
applied research in this field.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
advanced estimation methods<br />
the construction <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of statistical tests<br />
the analysis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of panel data models<br />
the analysis <strong>and</strong> critical evaluation of models with limited dependent variables<br />
unit roots, cointegration, <strong>and</strong> other advanced topics in time-series econometrics.<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
propose <strong>and</strong> study estimators derived from general estimation principles<br />
construct tests derived from general testing principles<br />
elaborate on st<strong>and</strong>ard econometric models dealing with time series, limited dependent variables, unit root <strong>and</strong><br />
cointegration<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> interpret the numerical outcomes of econometric procedures
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
specify an estimation or testing method appropriate for a model<br />
read theoretical <strong>and</strong> applied articles in econometric journals<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Hayashi, F. (2000). Econometrics. Princeton University Press.<br />
Newey, W.K. & D. Mc Fadden (1994). Large Sample Estimation <strong>and</strong> Hypothesis Testing. Chap. 36, H<strong>and</strong>book of Econometrics,<br />
Volume 4, Elsevier.<br />
W. H. Greene (2003). Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, Fifth Edition.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
lecture 2 hours/week<br />
seminar 1 hour/week<br />
3 hours/week total instructional time<br />
11 weeks in Semester 2<br />
33 hours total instructional time<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
7 hours/week learning time<br />
11 weeks in Semester 2<br />
77 hours total learning time<br />
40 hours total revision time<br />
117 hours total independent learning time<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
33 hours total instructional time<br />
117 hours total independent learning time<br />
150 total module notional study hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
midterm test(s) Coursework TBA 25% No none<br />
final examination Examination 2.5 hours 75% Yes none<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Digitally signed by George Kapetanios<br />
DN: cn=George Kapetanios, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, UoL, ou=School of Economics <strong>and</strong><br />
Finance,<br />
email=g.kapetanios@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.02.01 12:03:34 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 122<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Module Proposal<br />
School of Law<br />
Medical Law & The Family<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
No significant issues identified.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Medical Law & The Family<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 45 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
M260 Medical Law<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Law<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
LLM<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 30 5 n/a
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The rationale of this module is to introduce law students to the gradual attention of medical lawyers, legislators <strong>and</strong> the courts to<br />
familial aspects <strong>and</strong> influences on various health care issues. Therefore, this course will explore in detail the relationship between<br />
medicine, law <strong>and</strong> the family. The course aims to explain the complex issues surrounding the doctor-patient-family relationship<br />
<strong>and</strong> analyze the different moral <strong>and</strong> legal arguments in this complicated area. Students seeking to be involved in the practice of<br />
medical law <strong>and</strong> family law needs to underst<strong>and</strong> the relevant issues which arise as a result of the developments of medical<br />
technologies <strong>and</strong> this module meets these needs. Students interested in research will acquire knowledge <strong>and</strong> skills which enable<br />
them in their studies in medical law, bioethics <strong>and</strong> family law. This module broadens the scope of the legal analysis taught in the<br />
department of law in the above three areas <strong>and</strong> complements courses currently taught in these areas in the department of law.<br />
This course will be offered as an optional module in the LLM programme.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Department of law, School of Law<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Medical Law & The Family<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 45 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr. Roy Gilbar<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
The family has gradually gained the attention of medical lawyer, legislators <strong>and</strong> the courts on various health care issues.<br />
Therefore, this course will explore the relationship between medicine, law <strong>and</strong> the family. It will concentrate on: (1) the impact of<br />
medical technologies on the formation of the family <strong>and</strong> its perception in society; (2) the involvement of the family when<br />
decisions about the patient’s medical treatment are considered; <strong>and</strong> (3) the impact of medicine on the relationship between<br />
family members.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
(i) To deepen the knowledge on the subject, particularly the underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> appreciation of the relationship between<br />
medicine, law <strong>and</strong> the family.<br />
(ii) To engender a critical appreciation of the dynamic nature of this area <strong>and</strong> how it has developed in response to sociological,<br />
philosophical <strong>and</strong> medical influences.<br />
(iii) To foster a great appreciation of the disparate judicial, law reform, academic <strong>and</strong> participant views that influence<br />
developments in this area.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
the relationship between law, medicine <strong>and</strong> the family<br />
the legal, bioethical <strong>and</strong> practical aspects of the doctor-patient-family relationship<br />
the impact of medical technologies on the formation <strong>and</strong> perception of the family in law <strong>and</strong> society<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
produce a critical evaluation of the relevant arguments <strong>and</strong> principles used by the legislator, the courts <strong>and</strong><br />
professional bodies <strong>and</strong> assess their potential strength <strong>and</strong> shortcomings in their application<br />
apply different perceptions of leading legal principles to relevant cases<br />
improve their ability to provide critical analysis when facing relevant cases in practice <strong>and</strong> research<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
identify conflicting moral <strong>and</strong> legal arguments when facing relevant cases in practice<br />
apply relevant knowledge in legal analysis <strong>and</strong> study<br />
provide a critical analysis of the relevant principles in medical law <strong>and</strong> family law generally
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
deal with complicated medico-legal issues <strong>and</strong> make informed judgements<br />
apply knowledge when facing relevant cases in practice <strong>and</strong> research<br />
present different conflicting views in medical law, bioethics <strong>and</strong> family law<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
The lecturer's h<strong>and</strong>outs<br />
Relevant books on the subject are:<br />
Lindemann Nelson H., Lindemann-Nelson J., The Patient in the Family (Routledge, 1995)<br />
Hardwig J., Is There a Duty to Die: And other essays in Medical Ethics (Routledge, 2000)<br />
Mackenzie C., Stoljar N., Relational Autonomy: Feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency <strong>and</strong> the social self (OUP, 2000)<br />
Gilbar R., The Status the Family in Law & Bioethics: The genetic context (Ashgate, 2005)<br />
Mclean S., Autonomy, Consent <strong>and</strong> the Law (Routledge-Cavendish, 2010)<br />
Morris A., Jones M., Blackstone’s Statutes on Medical Law (6th edn., 2009).<br />
Periodical literature<br />
- Gilbar R., Family involvement, independence <strong>and</strong> patient autonomy in practice (2011) 19 Medical Law Review (forthcoming)<br />
- O’Donovan K., Gilbar R., The loved ones: Families, intimates <strong>and</strong> patient autonomy (2003) 23 (2) Legal Studies 332-358<br />
- Hardwig J., What about the family? (1990) 20 Hastings Center Report 5-10<br />
- Cassell E., Unanswered questions: Bioethics <strong>and</strong> human relationships (2007) 37 (5) Hastings Center Report 20-23<br />
- Minow M., Who’s the patient? (1994) 53 <strong>Mary</strong>l<strong>and</strong> Law Review 1173-1192<br />
- Brazier M., Do no harm- do patients have responsibilities too? (2006) 65 (2) Cambridge Law Journal 397-422<br />
- Lindemann-Nelson H., Lindemann-Nelson J., The romance of the family (2008) 38 (4) Hastings Center<br />
- Murray T., What are families for? Getting an ethics of reproductive technology (2002) 32 (3) The Hastings Center Report 41<br />
- Gilbar R., Between unconditional acceptance <strong>and</strong> responsibility: Should family ethics limit the scope of reproductive autonomy?<br />
(2009) 21 (3) the Child & Family Law Quarterly 309-335<br />
Relevant case law
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
weekly seminars/lectures = 44 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
weekly reading, 8 hours= 200 hours<br />
revision for the exam= 206 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
45 hours = 450 notional study hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
final exam Examination 3 hours 100% Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 123<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Peter<br />
Alldridge<br />
Digitally signed by Peter Alldridge<br />
DN: cn=Peter Alldridge, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=Department of Law,<br />
email=p.w.alldridge@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 12:56:14 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Module Proposal(s)<br />
School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />
Mapping the Nation, 1707-1801<br />
James Joyce's Finnegans Wake<br />
Feminist Thought: History, Criticism <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />
Milton: Revolutions in Writing<br />
Performance <strong>and</strong> Celebrity<br />
Renaissance Performance <strong>and</strong> the Lyric Voice<br />
Staging the UK<br />
The Court of Henry Viii: Then <strong>and</strong> Now<br />
The crisis of culture: literature <strong>and</strong> politics, 1918-1948<br />
Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
Staging the UK<br />
This module is to be made available to associate<br />
students. Will they do exactly the same assessment as<br />
QM students?<br />
Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />
This module is to be made available to associate<br />
students. Will they do exactly the same assessment as<br />
QM students?
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Mapping the Nation, 1707-1801<br />
Module Code ESH7101<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date January 2012<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
Q320 English Literature<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
n/a<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
n/a<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 5 12<br />
2012/13 10 5 12<br />
2013/14 10 5 12
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This optional module may be taken by students on the MA Writing <strong>and</strong> Society 1700-1820, <strong>and</strong> other MA programmes in English.<br />
Its concern with national <strong>and</strong> regional identity complements the emphasis on space <strong>and</strong> location found in existing historicising<br />
modules on the MA (such as Panoramas of London, Metro-Intellectuals, <strong>and</strong> Sociability), <strong>and</strong> supplements their metropolitan<br />
focus with attention to regional <strong>and</strong> national l<strong>and</strong>scapes. The module's engagement with questions of patriotism, tourism, <strong>and</strong><br />
the emergence of national infrastructures complements many of the issues explored in the Primitivism <strong>and</strong> Progress module,<strong>and</strong><br />
also addresses geographical <strong>and</strong> aesthetic texts concerning l<strong>and</strong>scapes that are not elsewhere examined on the MA.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Students will be expected to purchase some texts, <strong>and</strong> the VLE will be used.<br />
Copies of set texts (listed below), <strong>and</strong> recommended secondary texts, should be<br />
purchased by the library. The module will also require 2 hours per week of staff<br />
teaching time, plus admin support.<br />
n/a<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Mapping the Nation, 1707-1801<br />
Module Code ESH7101<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr. Chris Reid<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module will examine texts concerned with British/UK national identity <strong>and</strong> the representation of l<strong>and</strong>scape, between the<br />
Anglo-Scottish Union of 1707 <strong>and</strong> the Anglo-Irish Union of 1800-1801 (<strong>and</strong> its immediate legacy). We will use a range of<br />
theoretical, historiographical <strong>and</strong> methodological approaches to consider how authors responded to the constitutional <strong>and</strong><br />
cultural emergence of ‘Great Britain’ <strong>and</strong> the ‘United Kingdom’. Through the consultation of contemporary essays, novels, travelliterature,<br />
journalism, guide-books, poetry, philosophical texts <strong>and</strong> visual material, we will explore how attitudes to national <strong>and</strong><br />
regional identity were expressed through representations of the national l<strong>and</strong>scape. Related questions of patriotism, cultural<br />
nationalism, l<strong>and</strong>scape aesthetics, radical ideology, tourism, the liberty of the press, <strong>and</strong> the relationship between politics <strong>and</strong><br />
culture will be addressed through readings of printed literary, political <strong>and</strong> geographical texts, <strong>and</strong> supplementary secondary <strong>and</strong><br />
theoretical texts. In addition, students will be encouraged <strong>and</strong> guided to consult manuscript sources relevant to the module's<br />
concerns.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
1. To introduce students to a range of texts published between 1707 <strong>and</strong> 1801, <strong>and</strong> subsequently, that reflect upon the period's<br />
legacy in the history of nationhood <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />
2. To develop students’ capacity for the analysis <strong>and</strong> interpretation of a range of genres <strong>and</strong> sources from the eighteenth century.<br />
3. To explore connections between literary texts, non-fictional texts (including, but not limited to, guide-books, travel-writing,<br />
newspapers, <strong>and</strong> letters) <strong>and</strong> non-textual artefacts (including, but not limited to, paintings <strong>and</strong> maps).<br />
4. To develop students' skills in the evaluation of both printed <strong>and</strong> manuscript primary source material, in relation to<br />
contemporary scholarly debates.<br />
5. To enable students to use <strong>and</strong> evaluate a range of research aids (including, but not limited to, printed <strong>and</strong> electronic aids) to<br />
locate relevant printed <strong>and</strong> manuscript sources, as part of the students' independent <strong>and</strong> insightful research into literature of the<br />
British Isles in the long eighteenth century.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
a range of texts published between 1707 <strong>and</strong> 1801, <strong>and</strong> subsequently, that reflect upon the period's legacy in terms of<br />
the history of nationhood <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong>scape.<br />
the geo-historical, political, biographical <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts relevant to the study of selected literary, political,<br />
geographical, <strong>and</strong> philosophical texts on the reading list.<br />
circumstances pertaining to the production, dissemination <strong>and</strong> reception of the textual <strong>and</strong> non-textual artefacts<br />
consulted during the module.<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
conduct perceptive <strong>and</strong> historically-informed readings of texts across a number of genres from the long eighteenth<br />
century.<br />
evaluate the propriety <strong>and</strong> relevance of a range of theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological approaches to research.<br />
evaluate the relative importance of evidence, arguments <strong>and</strong> resources derived from primary <strong>and</strong> secondary material.<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
develop initiative in structuring independent research, including the use of research aids to locate relevant sources.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
enhance skills in working individually <strong>and</strong> collectively, in a range of environments including (but not limited to)<br />
independent research, presentation, essay-writing <strong>and</strong> seminar discussion.<br />
adapt <strong>and</strong> transfer the critical methods that will be introduced in the module to a variety of working environments<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
use research aids (including, but not limited to, printed <strong>and</strong> electronic aids) to locate relevant printed <strong>and</strong> manuscript<br />
sources, as part of the students' independent <strong>and</strong> insightful research into literature of the British Isles in the long<br />
eighteenth century.<br />
develop skills in comparing texts <strong>and</strong> artefacts across a range of genres; <strong>and</strong> connecting ideas within the field of study.<br />
use writing for learning <strong>and</strong> reflection, <strong>and</strong> in doing so, develop skills in researching <strong>and</strong> constructing original <strong>and</strong><br />
perceptive essays.<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Week 1: The 1707 Anglo-Scottish Union <strong>and</strong> its Legacy<br />
Daniel Defoe: essays concerning the Union (1706-1707); <strong>and</strong> Tour Through the Whole Isl<strong>and</strong> of Great Britain (1724-6): selections<br />
Tobias Smollett, The Expedition of Humphrey Clinker (1771)<br />
Week 2: The Spirit of Patriotism<br />
Lord Bolingbroke, Letters on the Spirit of Patriotism (1749)<br />
Essays by Tobias Smollett <strong>and</strong> John Wilkes from The Briton <strong>and</strong> The North Briton (1762-3)<br />
Week 3: The British L<strong>and</strong>scape I: The Politics of the Prospect<br />
James Thomson, The Seasons (1728-30)<br />
John Dyer, 'Grongar Hill' (1726)<br />
Week 4: The British L<strong>and</strong>scape II: The Politics of the Sublime <strong>and</strong> Picturesque<br />
Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Inquiry into the Sublime <strong>and</strong> the Beautiful (1757)<br />
Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgement (1790): selections<br />
William Gilpin, Observations on the River Wye (1789) <strong>and</strong> Three Essays (1792): selections<br />
William Wordsworth, Guide to the Lakes (1810-1835): selections<br />
Week 5: 'The Country <strong>and</strong> the City': the Centre <strong>and</strong> the Margin?<br />
Raymond Williams, The Country <strong>and</strong> the City (1973)<br />
Gilbert White, The Natural History <strong>and</strong> Antiquities of Selborne (1789): selections<br />
William Wordsworth, The Prelude (1805/1850): selections<br />
Week 6: Celtic <strong>and</strong> Gaelic L<strong>and</strong>scapes<br />
James MacPherson, Fragments of Ancient Poetry (1760-63) <strong>and</strong> The Works of Ossian (1765): selections<br />
Iolo Morganwg (AKA Edward Williams), Poems, Lyric <strong>and</strong> Pastoral (1794) <strong>and</strong> Barddoniaeth Dafydd ab Gwilym (1789): selections<br />
Walter Scott, Waverley (1814)<br />
Week 8: Visual L<strong>and</strong>scapes: How to See the Nation<br />
Peter de Bolla, The Education of the Eye (2003)<br />
A selection of texts concerning the foundation of the Royal Academy of Art<br />
William Wordsworth's 'Inscription: Written with a Slate Pencil on the Side of the Mountain of Black Combe' <strong>and</strong> 'View from the<br />
Top of Black Combe' (1815)<br />
Week 9: Whose Nation?: Revolutionary L<strong>and</strong>scapes
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />
Richard Payne Knight, The L<strong>and</strong>scape, a Didactic Poem (1794)<br />
Uvedale Price, An Essay on the Picturesque (1794)<br />
John Clare, Poems Descriptive of Rural Life <strong>and</strong> Scenery (1820): selections<br />
Week 10: Satirising the Nation<br />
Tobias Smollett, The History <strong>and</strong> Adventures of an Atom (1769)<br />
Visual material: a selection of satirical prints from the British Museum Catalogue of Prints<br />
Week 11: The L<strong>and</strong> at War: Military L<strong>and</strong>scapes<br />
Henry Fielding, The History of Tom Jones, A Foundling (1749): selections<br />
Visual material: William Roy's Military Survey of Scotl<strong>and</strong> (1747-1755) <strong>and</strong> selection of Paul S<strong>and</strong>by's l<strong>and</strong>scape watercolours from<br />
catalogue of Royal Academy exhibition 2010<br />
Jane Austen, Pride <strong>and</strong> Prejudice (1813)<br />
Week 12: The 1801 Anglo-Irish Union: a United kingdom?<br />
Maria Edgeworth, The Absentee (1812)<br />
Sydney Owenson, The Wild Irish Girl: A National Tale (1806)<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
2 hours of structured seminar contact per week. Tutor will also be<br />
available for 1 scheduled office hour per week, over the 11 weeks of<br />
the module.<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
278 hours (st<strong>and</strong>ard notional time on all MA English modules,<br />
covering library research, primary <strong>and</strong> secondary reading, class<br />
preparation <strong>and</strong> preparation for final assessment).<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
300 hours.<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Essay Coursework 4000 words 100% Yes 50<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 11:05:41 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 124<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title James Joyce's Finnegans Wake<br />
Module Code ESH7302<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
Q322 English Literature by author<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 5 12<br />
2012/13 10 5 12<br />
2013/14 10 5 12
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module will be offered as an option to students taking the MA in English Literature <strong>and</strong> the MA in Writing in the Modern Age.<br />
It will supplement naturally a number of other modules currently available, including Freud <strong>and</strong> Proust, Modernism <strong>and</strong> Irel<strong>and</strong>,<br />
Modernism, Secularism <strong>and</strong> Religion, <strong>and</strong> Postcolonialism, Language <strong>and</strong> Identity.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
lecturing staff<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title James Joyce's Finnegans Wake<br />
Module Code ESH7302<br />
Credit Value 30 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Katie Fleming<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
Finnegans Wake has a reputation as the most difficult work of fiction ever written in the English (?) language. This course will<br />
offer students the opportunity to judge this for themselves in the context of a supportive <strong>and</strong> collaborative tutor-led seminar.<br />
Each week we will cover a couple of chapters <strong>and</strong> explore the text from a number of critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical perspectives, from<br />
psychoanalysis to postcolonial theory. Experience of studying Joyce or Modernism is desirable but not required, <strong>and</strong> it would be<br />
helpful if students could read Ulysses in advance of the course.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This module aims to offer students the opportunity to read this notoriously difficult <strong>and</strong> under-read yet theoretically <strong>and</strong><br />
historically important book from within the context of a supportive <strong>and</strong> collaborative seminar. It will allow students to develop<br />
their close reading <strong>and</strong> analytical skills, <strong>and</strong> to become familiar with, <strong>and</strong> fluent in the application of, a wide variety of critical <strong>and</strong><br />
theoretical perspectives.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
one of the most difficult works of fiction ever written in the English language<br />
the linguistic, literary, cultural <strong>and</strong> socio-historical contexts in which Finnegans Wake was written <strong>and</strong> read<br />
knowledge of useful <strong>and</strong> precise critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical terminology<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
articulate knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of Finnegans Wake <strong>and</strong> the concepts <strong>and</strong> theories relating to it<br />
demonstrate critical skills in the close reading, description, analysis, or production of Finnegans Wake<br />
demonstrate rhetorical skills of effective communication <strong>and</strong> argument, both oral <strong>and</strong> written<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
demonstrate advanced literacy <strong>and</strong> communication skills <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply these in appropriate contexts,<br />
including the ability to present sustained <strong>and</strong> persuasive written <strong>and</strong> oral arguments cogently <strong>and</strong> coherently<br />
the capacity to analyse <strong>and</strong> critically examine diverse forms of discourse<br />
demonstrate the capacity for independent thought <strong>and</strong> judgement demonstrated through critical practice
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
demonstrate competence in the planning <strong>and</strong> execution of essays, presentations, <strong>and</strong> other writing <strong>and</strong> project work<br />
show time management <strong>and</strong> organisational skills, as shown by the ability to plan <strong>and</strong> present conclusions effectively.<br />
use information technology (IT) skills broadly understood <strong>and</strong> demonstrate the ability to access, work with <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluate electronic resources (such as hypertext, conferencing, e-publishing, blogs <strong>and</strong> wikis)<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Finnegans Wake - seminar plan<br />
Seminar 1– Introduction – Beyond Ulysses<br />
Close reading: Detailed group reading of the first page.<br />
Seminar 2- Falling into Joyce<br />
Chapter 1 (3 – 29)<br />
Chapter 2 (30-47)<br />
Seminar 3 – The dangers of idle talk<br />
Chapter 3 (48 – 74)<br />
Chapter 4 (75 – 103)<br />
Seminar 4 – Reading Joyce Reading Us<br />
Chapter 5 (104 - 125)<br />
Chapter 6 (126 – 168)<br />
Seminar 5 – Writing <strong>and</strong> the self<br />
Chapter 7 (169 – 195)<br />
Chapter 8 (196 – 216)<br />
Seminar 6 – Deconstruction <strong>and</strong> the Wake?<br />
Chapter 9 (219 – 259)<br />
Seminar 7 – Sincerity <strong>and</strong> the Aesthetics of Chaosmos<br />
Chapter 10 (260 – 308)<br />
Seminar 8 - Technology <strong>and</strong> techno-poetics<br />
Chapter 11 (309 – 382)<br />
Seminar 9 – The Ondt <strong>and</strong> the Gracehoper<br />
Chapter 12 (383 – 399)<br />
Chapter 13 (403 – 428)<br />
Seminar 10 – (first half) Travelling the world<br />
Chapter 14 (429 – 473)<br />
Seminar 10 (second half) Trial, Confession <strong>and</strong> ethics. Politics <strong>and</strong> character in Finnegans Wake<br />
Chapter 15 (474 – 554)<br />
Seminar 11- Conclusions?
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />
Chapter 16 (555 – 590)<br />
Chapter 17 (593 – 628)<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
2 hour seminar (22 hours in total)<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
16 hours reading per week (160 hours); 118 hours working on<br />
assessment<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
300 notional study hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Essay Coursework 4000 100 Yes 50<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 125<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 11:06:30 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Feminist Thought: History, Criticism <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />
Module Code ESH389<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
Q300 English studies<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 30 10 36<br />
2012/13 40 10 54<br />
2013/14 40 10 54
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module would be offered as an option at Level 6, <strong>and</strong> would be aimed at 3rd year English joint <strong>and</strong> single honours<br />
undergraduates <strong>and</strong> Associate students in the Department of English. It is might also be of interest to students from History, Film<br />
<strong>and</strong> Politics departments. The installation of this module as a 3rd year option would complete a pathway that begins with the<br />
first year ESH102 Reading Theory <strong>and</strong> Interpretation course of study where students are briefly introduced to feminist criticism. It<br />
would also supplement Level 5 modules like ESH230 Women Writing in the Romantic Period <strong>and</strong> ESH243 Architexts, <strong>and</strong> its<br />
robust theoretical framework would usefully complement a range of Level 6 modules including ESH376 Gender, Race <strong>and</strong> Empire<br />
<strong>and</strong> ESH330 Virginia Woolf. The module is intended to address a long-st<strong>and</strong>ing deficiency in the provision of modules in the<br />
Department that deal with women’s writing generally, <strong>and</strong> it would further contribute to the good range of contemporary critical<br />
<strong>and</strong> theoretical modules available at Level 6. The module steers a course through the literary criticism, history <strong>and</strong> theory of<br />
feminism, running from the publication of Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex in 1949, to the contemporary period.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
2 staff members; AV-equipped teaching room<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Feminist Thought: History, Criticism <strong>and</strong> Theory<br />
Module Code ESH389<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Katherine Fleming<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module engages with contemporary feminist thought, steering a course though the literary criticism, history <strong>and</strong> theory of<br />
feminism from the publication of Simone de Beauvoir's 'The Second Sex' in 1949 onwards. It examines the significant debates<br />
<strong>and</strong> key concepts of feminist thought through a range of literary, political <strong>and</strong> philosophical texts <strong>and</strong> encourages students to<br />
develop their own critical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of gender <strong>and</strong> equality issues in the contemporary period. Students are invited to<br />
explore the impact of feminist approaches on literary criticism, to underst<strong>and</strong> the critical feminist project in its own terms, <strong>and</strong> to<br />
examine feminism in relation to Marxism, psychoanalysis, sexuality, post-structuralism, neo-liberalism <strong>and</strong> international<br />
feminism.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The object of this module is to steer a course through the history, literary criticism <strong>and</strong> theory of feminist thought in the<br />
contemporary period. Students who undertake this module will have acquired knowledge of the modern history of women’s<br />
struggle, <strong>and</strong> have an in-depth underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the significant debates <strong>and</strong> key concepts of feminist thought. The module<br />
prompts students to trace these debates <strong>and</strong> concepts through a range of material of different genre, <strong>and</strong> to draw from the<br />
selected texts a theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of gender <strong>and</strong> sexual difference. The course also encourages students to think<br />
conceptually <strong>and</strong> to develop their own independent <strong>and</strong> well-informed critical positions in relation to the material they read<br />
both here <strong>and</strong> elsewhere.<br />
As a third-year Level 6 module, this course of study completes a pathway through the QM undergraduate English degree that<br />
allows students to engage with writing about <strong>and</strong>/or by women. The module supplements a range of our pre-existing modules<br />
<strong>and</strong> the theoretical <strong>and</strong> conceptual thinking that it fosters should enhance the student’s critical approaches to the other modules<br />
they also take.<br />
The module will also further contribute to the Department's sense of English Studies as a broad, interdisciplinary, <strong>and</strong> farreaching<br />
domain. By offering a module especially concerned with issues of gender <strong>and</strong> equality, the School might also be seen<br />
to sanction feminist thought as a valuable component of its own intellectual culture.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
a substantial number of authors <strong>and</strong> texts from across the periods of contemporary feminist<br />
history.<br />
useful <strong>and</strong> precise critical terminology of feminist thought.<br />
the literary, cultural <strong>and</strong> socio-historical contexts in which feminist thought is written <strong>and</strong> read.<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
demonstrate the critical skills of close reading, description, analysis of the key texts<br />
of feminist discourse.<br />
articulate knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of texts, concepts <strong>and</strong> theories relating to feminism <strong>and</strong> its critical <strong>and</strong><br />
literary history.<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> how feminist thought takes different forms according to different cultural contexts <strong>and</strong> conditions.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
demonstrate advanced literacy <strong>and</strong> communication skills <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply these in appropriate contexts,<br />
including the ability to present sustained <strong>and</strong> persuasive written <strong>and</strong> oral arguments cogently <strong>and</strong> coherently.<br />
analyse <strong>and</strong> critically examine diverse forms of discourse.<br />
acquire substantial quantities of complex information in a structured <strong>and</strong> systematic way involving the use of the<br />
distinctive interpretative skills of the subject.<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
adapt <strong>and</strong> transfer the critical methods of the discipline to a variety of working environments.<br />
demonstrate competence in the planning <strong>and</strong> execution of essays, presentations, <strong>and</strong> other<br />
writing work.<br />
comprehend <strong>and</strong> develop intricate concepts in an open-ended way which involves an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of purpose <strong>and</strong><br />
consequences.<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Indicative Reading List:<br />
Please note that the final selection of extracts <strong>and</strong> texts for each week will to be taken from (but not<br />
necessarily including all) the texts listed below.<br />
Week 1: The Second Sex:<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, (1949)<br />
Camille Paglia, Sexual Personae, (1990)<br />
Nina Power, One Dimensional Woman (2009)<br />
Week 2: 1968 & the Women’s Movement<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Germaine Greer, The Female Eunuch (1970)<br />
Kate Millett, Sexual Politics (1968)<br />
Boston Women’s Collective, Our Bodies Ourselves (1973)<br />
Week 3: Women, Pacificism <strong>and</strong> War<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Lysistrata<br />
Virginia Woolf, Three Guineas (1938)<br />
Simone Weil, Gravity <strong>and</strong> Grace (1947/52)<br />
Week 4: ‘What women want’: Freud, Femininity & Psychoanalysis<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Sigmund Freud, 'Femininity', in New Introductory Lectures in Psychoanalysis (1932)<br />
Jacqueline Rose, 'Femininity <strong>and</strong> its Discontents', in Sexuality in the Field of Vision (1986)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
Juliet Mitchell, Psychoanalysis & Feminism: Freud, Reich, Laing <strong>and</strong> Women (1974)<br />
H.D, Letters <strong>and</strong> Tribute to Freud (1956)<br />
Week 5: Politics of Pornography<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Andrea Dworkin, Intercourse (1987)<br />
Catherine MacKinnon, Pornography <strong>and</strong> Civil Rights: A New Day for Women's Equality (1988)<br />
Anais Nin, selected stories from Little Birds (1979)<br />
Week 6: Consuming <strong>and</strong> Producing Culture<br />
Laura Mulvey, ‘Visual Pleasure <strong>and</strong> Narrative Cinema’, in Screen (1975) 16 (3): 6–18<br />
Susan Sontag, On Photography (1977), selected extracts<br />
This week may incorporate a research trip to the Women’s Library to speak with contemporary artists who were commissioned to<br />
produce work for the libraries permanent collection in 2010, or a viewing <strong>and</strong> discussion of 'InThe Cut' (Campion, 2003).<br />
Week 7: Reading Week<br />
Week 8: French Feminism<br />
Luce Irigaray, Speculum of the Other, selected extracts<br />
Helène Cixous, ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’, (1976)<br />
Julia Kristeva, ‘Stabat Mater’, in The Kristeva Reader, ed. Toril Moi (1986)<br />
Jacques Derrida, ‘Women in the Beehive’ in differences (2005) 16 3, 139-15<br />
Week 9: Queerying Sexuality<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Shulamith Firestone, The Dialectics of Sex (1970)<br />
Judith Butler, Gender Trouble (1990)<br />
Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, Tendencies (1993)<br />
Week 10: Prosthetic Goddesses<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Donna Haraway, ŒA Cyborg Manifesto: Science Technology <strong>and</strong> Socialist- Feminism in the Late 20th Century (1985)<br />
Naomi Wolf, The Beauty Myth (1991)<br />
Elizabeth Grosz, Volatile Bodies: Towards a Corporeal Feminism (1994)<br />
Joanna Zylinska, On Spiders, Cyborgs <strong>and</strong> Being Scared: the Feminine <strong>and</strong> the Sublime (2001)<br />
Week 11: International Feminisms<br />
Selected extracts from:<br />
Mahasweta Devi, Imaginary Maps (1995)<br />
Joumana Haddad, I Killed Scheherezade: Confessions of An Angry Arab Woman (2010)<br />
Ayaan Hirsi Ali, The Caged Virgin: A Muslim Woman's Cry for Reason (2006)<br />
Week 12: Feminism <strong>and</strong> neo-liberalism<br />
Michele Barrett <strong>and</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> McIntosh, The Anti-Social Family (1991)<br />
Selected extracts from contemporary women web-loggers, including Dooce.com, the F-Word blog, bitchmagazine.org <strong>and</strong><br />
Broadsheet at www.salon.com<br />
General Reading:<br />
Cora Kaplan’s Sea Changes: Culture <strong>and</strong> Feminism (1986)<br />
Reina Lewis <strong>and</strong> Sara Mills (ed) Feminist Postcolonial Theory (2003)<br />
Catherine Stimpson, Where the Meanings are: Feminism <strong>and</strong> Cultural Spaces (1984)<br />
Toril Moi, Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory (1985/ 2002)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
2 hour seminars for 11 weeks (22 hours teaching in total per<br />
seminar group), with out of class hours assignment consultations.<br />
The module may also incorporate a research trip to the Women's<br />
Library in Aldgate.<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
At least 6 hours reading per week (66 hours), plus approximately 65<br />
hours working on assessment<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
153 notional study hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Portfolio of 2 assignments from<br />
the selection below:<br />
1. Close reading of de Beauvoir,<br />
<strong>and</strong><br />
2. Analysis of press cutting or<br />
image, or<br />
3. Selection <strong>and</strong> summary of<br />
critical feminist review article<br />
published after 1990<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Coursework 2000 40 No N/A<br />
Critical Essay Coursework 3000 60 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 11:08:25 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 126<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Milton: Revolutions in Writing<br />
Module Code ESH390<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code Q322 English Literature by author<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
None<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
None<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 18 10 18<br />
2012/13 18 10 18<br />
2013/14 18 10 18
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This option module will contribute significantly to the offerings in the Department at Level 6 in the Renaissance <strong>and</strong> Early<br />
Modern Subject Area Group. It responds specifically to requests made by students taking ESH224 Seventeenth-Century Literary<br />
Culture for further study of Milton <strong>and</strong> Paradise Lost. It will enable students to concentrate on the (extremely influential) writings<br />
of a single author at the highest undergraduate level, <strong>and</strong> will fill a gap in our offerings in the later seventeenth century. It will<br />
thus contribute to pathways of study in this historical period, while also linking to those in the early eighteenth century. In<br />
addition, it will provide an opportunity for students with an interest in poetry to develop this by means of an intensive reading of<br />
a single text in the epic tradition. However, the intensive reading will be carefully contextualised, both historically <strong>and</strong> formally:<br />
students will gain a sophisticated underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the literary, religious, <strong>and</strong> social politics of the mid to late seventeenth<br />
century, <strong>and</strong> consider what it might mean for an author to effect political change through writing in poetry <strong>and</strong> prose. It will be<br />
available to single <strong>and</strong> joint honours English students <strong>and</strong> Associates.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
1 staff member; AV-equipped teaching room<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
None<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Milton: Revolutions in Writing<br />
Module Code ESH390<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr David Colclough<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None None ESH224, ESH267<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module offers an intensive study of the writing <strong>and</strong> thought of John Milton: possibly the most important author of the<br />
seventeenth century. At its heart is a detailed reading <strong>and</strong> discussion of Milton’s great epic poem, Paradise Lost (1674). We will<br />
consider what Milton aimed to effect in writing <strong>and</strong> publishing Paradise Lost, <strong>and</strong> will study it in the context of the changes in<br />
society <strong>and</strong> religion that were taking place at the time. Milton was a political revolutionary; he was also a revolutionary writer,<br />
who attempted to carry out a thorough reform of English literature as well as of English society. In seminar discussions we will<br />
analyze Paradise Lost alongside some of Milton’s other revolutionary writings, including his plea for the freedom of the press,<br />
Areopagitica (1644).
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This module aims to introduce students to one of the greatest poems in the English language, Paradise Lost. It aims to help<br />
students to build on their previous studies in developing the critical tools necessary to analyze such a complex piece of epic<br />
verse, <strong>and</strong> to guide them towards the sources of contextual information that will help them to underst<strong>and</strong> it in its moment of<br />
composition <strong>and</strong> publication, as well as in the subsequent history of English literature. It aims further to encourage students to<br />
consider at a sophisticated level the relationship between writing <strong>and</strong> society at a time of rapid <strong>and</strong> intense social <strong>and</strong> political<br />
change, <strong>and</strong> to reflect on the ways in which writers past <strong>and</strong> present conceive of the place of the author in wider society.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A complex, long, <strong>and</strong> influential epic poem (Paradise Lost) <strong>and</strong> its historical contexts<br />
The critical tradition on Paradise Lost <strong>and</strong> the current state of scholarship on the text <strong>and</strong> its author<br />
Critical debates concerning the relationship between literary writing <strong>and</strong> society, both in the seventeenth century <strong>and</strong><br />
today<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Carefully analyze the form <strong>and</strong> arguments of long passages of verse in seventeenth-century English<br />
Set a work of literature in its historical context <strong>and</strong> select the most appropriate context through which to advance an<br />
interpretation of it<br />
Read <strong>and</strong> assess the usefulness of a wide range of critical writing on the text; engage with <strong>and</strong> debate the opinions of<br />
the best past <strong>and</strong> current scholarship<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Research independently in primary <strong>and</strong> secondary literature <strong>and</strong> marshall evidence to produce an original argument<br />
Present opinions eloquently <strong>and</strong> in a well organised form to peers <strong>and</strong> teachers, both orally <strong>and</strong> in writing<br />
Reflect in a sophisticated manner on own performance <strong>and</strong> those of others, both in discussion <strong>and</strong> in writing
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Write in a fluent, sophisticated, <strong>and</strong> persuasive style at the highest level<br />
Confidently advance structured arguments in oral presentation<br />
Debate professionally <strong>and</strong> coherently with peers <strong>and</strong> teachers<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Week 1 Introduction: Milton – Writing Revolution / Revolutions in Writing<br />
Milton, ‘To the Lord General Cromwell’; selections from Of the Tenure of Kings <strong>and</strong><br />
Magistrates.<br />
Gordon Campbell <strong>and</strong> Thomas N. Corns, John Milton: Life, Work, <strong>and</strong> Thought (Oxford:<br />
Oxford University Press, 2008).<br />
Week 2 Paradise Lost, Books 1 <strong>and</strong> 2<br />
AND<br />
Selections from Homer, Iliad <strong>and</strong> Odyssey; Virgil, Aeneid; Edmund Spenser, The Faerie <strong>Queen</strong>, ed. A.C. Hamilton, 2nd edn (Harlow,<br />
2006); The Putney Debates (1647)<br />
Week 3 Paradise Lost, Books 3 <strong>and</strong> 4<br />
AND<br />
Selections from King James Bible (Romans; Genesis); Andrew Willett, Hexapla in Genesim (Cambridge, 1608)<br />
Week 4 Paradise Lost, Books 5 <strong>and</strong> 6<br />
AND<br />
Selections from John Dod <strong>and</strong> Robert Cleaver, A godly form of household government for the ordering of private families,<br />
according to the direction of Gods word<br />
(1621); Mercurius Politicus <strong>and</strong> Mercurius Rusticus [Civil War newsbooks]<br />
Week 5 Paradise Lost, Books 7 <strong>and</strong> 8<br />
AND<br />
Selections from King James Bible (Genesis); John Donne, Two Sermons Preached before King Charles, Upon the xxvi verse of the<br />
first Chapter of genesis (preached 1629); Thomas Aquinas, Summa theologica.<br />
Week 6 IN-CLASS TEST<br />
Week 7 R E A D I N G W E E K<br />
Week 8 Paradise Lost, Books 9 <strong>and</strong> 10<br />
AND<br />
Selections from Aemelia Lanyer, Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum (1611); John Donne, Biathanatos (1648)<br />
Week 9 Paradise Lost, Books 11 <strong>and</strong> 12<br />
AND<br />
Selections from St Augustine, The City of God; Jean Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion; [George Carleton], The Collegiat<br />
Svffrage of the Divines of Great Britaine, concerning the five articles controverted in the Low Countries (1619).<br />
Week 10 Paradise Regain’d<br />
AND
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />
Selections from Milton, De Doctrina Christiana.<br />
Week 11 Areopagitica: Publishing Freedom<br />
AND<br />
Nigel Smith, ‘Areopagitica: voicing contexts, 1643-5’, in David Loewenstein <strong>and</strong> James Grantham Turner (eds), Politics, Poetics,<br />
<strong>and</strong> Hermeneutics in Milton’s Prose (Cambridge, 1990).<br />
David Norbrook, Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric <strong>and</strong> Politics 1627-1660 (Cambridge, 1999), pp. 118-139.<br />
Week 12 Review <strong>and</strong> Conclusion; essay consultations<br />
General Reading:<br />
John Milton, Paradise Lost, ed. Alastair Fowler, 2nd edn (1998)<br />
John Milton, Samson Agonistes, in The Complete Shorter Poems, ed. John Carey, 2nd edn (1997)<br />
John Milton, Areopagitica (1644)<br />
Sharon Achinstein, Milton <strong>and</strong> the Revolutionary Reader (1994)<br />
Gordon Campbell <strong>and</strong> Thomas N. Corns, John Milton: Life, Work, <strong>and</strong> Thought (2008)<br />
Thomas N. Corns (ed.), A Companion to Milton (2003)<br />
Dennis Danielson (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Milton (1999)<br />
Stanley Fish, Surprised by Sin: The Reader in Paradise Lost (1997)<br />
Annabel Patterson, Milton's Words (2009)<br />
Joad Raymond, Milton's Angels (2010)<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
2-hour seminar, including student presentations (2 hours/wk; 22<br />
hours total)<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Student research <strong>and</strong> preparation: 6 hours/wk (66 hours total)<br />
Preparation of two elements of assessment: 62 hours total<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
In-class test (formative: students<br />
consolidate first half of module<br />
by responding to one<br />
comprehension exercise <strong>and</strong> one<br />
essay question)<br />
Research essay (students<br />
undertake summative<br />
assessment by researching <strong>and</strong><br />
writing at length of one of a<br />
number of essay questions)<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Coursework 2hrs 30 No N/A<br />
Coursework 4000 words 70 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 11:09:17 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 127<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Performance <strong>and</strong> Celebrity<br />
Module Code DRA341<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
W400 Drama<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Other (please specify by typing in box)<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
NA<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Drama<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 21 15 25<br />
2012/13 21 15 25<br />
2013/14 21 15 25
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Critical engagement with the social <strong>and</strong> cultural phenomenon of ‘celebrity’ is relatively new. In the last ten years, scholars <strong>and</strong><br />
theorists have begun to frame celebrity as not merely a manifestation of narcissism <strong>and</strong> media manipulation, but rather a vital<br />
<strong>and</strong> dynamic social terrain in which a variety of disciplines (e.g. sociology, history, philosophy, psychology, visual art,<br />
performance) can converge in t<strong>and</strong>em with a variety of dialectics (e.g. Marxism, Feminism, cultural materialism).<br />
The success of the new Routledge publication, “Celebrity Studies” (launched in 2010 <strong>and</strong> already rolling out its second volume)<br />
speaks to both the intellectual <strong>and</strong> academic interest generated by the work, <strong>and</strong> its ability to reach out to a larger audience.<br />
A course centered around the study of celebrity would be an exciting <strong>and</strong> interesting addition to <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>’s curriculum<br />
precisely because it intersects with the department’s theoretical pluralism <strong>and</strong> inter-disciplinary ethos, it will ensure that students<br />
are part of generating discourse around a new field, <strong>and</strong> it will contribute to the dialogue between academia <strong>and</strong> the greater<br />
public.<br />
Optional: single <strong>and</strong> joint honours Drama students plus Associates<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
lecturer<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
NA:<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Performance <strong>and</strong> Celebrity<br />
Module Code DRA341<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Nadia Davids<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
N/A N/A N/A<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module examines ‘celebrity’ <strong>and</strong> the ‘performance of celebrity’. It positions an array of celebrities (actors, politicians,<br />
musicians, sports-people) within their individual political, social, historical <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts allowing them to be read as<br />
‘media texts’ through which to think through <strong>and</strong> around issues of commodification, globalization stardom, narcissism,<br />
iconography, philanthropy, cultural appropriation, media consumption <strong>and</strong> media production. The module refracts these issues<br />
through a variety of theoretical <strong>and</strong> ideological lenses (feminism, Marxism, cultural materialism, post-colonialism), encouraging<br />
close analysis of the way in which celebrity constructions of race, gender, nation, sexuality <strong>and</strong> power function in the public’s<br />
imagination. The module focuses on the development <strong>and</strong> imperatives of 21st century fame, opening with historical-case studies<br />
of manifestations of celebrity <strong>and</strong> culminating in contemporary case studies.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
-give an overview of the intersections <strong>and</strong> connections between media, power, performance <strong>and</strong> globalisation<br />
- encourage students to engage critically with the ubiquitous presence of media, celebrity <strong>and</strong> the heightened performance of<br />
the every-day in their daily lives.<br />
- further develop <strong>and</strong> deepen student’s theoretical knowledge <strong>and</strong> to provide them with instances in which they can forge new<br />
relationships between “text” <strong>and</strong> theory. (This emphasis on theory will be especially stressed as a means of replacing anecdotal<br />
discussions of celebrity with analytical ones)<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
The relationship between media, celebrity <strong>and</strong> commodification.<br />
An underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the cultural, historical <strong>and</strong> political premise on which 'celebrity' is built<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
An underst<strong>and</strong>ing of how to apply a variety of theoretical discourses onto public 'media texts'<br />
Further familiarity with a vocabulary of critique to further their scholarly <strong>and</strong>/or creative practice<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Students would have gained experience in researching, analysing <strong>and</strong> writing a long-form essay.<br />
Students would have gained experience <strong>and</strong> practice in researching <strong>and</strong> presenting an in class presentation.<br />
Practical skills - able to:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />
D 1<br />
Write critically, execute individual research, work collaboratively with others, present to a group<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Currid, Elizabeth, Starstruck: The Business of Celebrity. Faber <strong>and</strong> Faber, 2010.<br />
Da Marshall, P, The Celebrity Culture Reader / Edition 1, Taylor & Francis, Inc, 2006.<br />
Goodall, Jane, Stage Presence, Routledge, 2008<br />
Gamson, Joshua, Claims to Fame: Celebrity in Contemporary America, University of California Press, 1996.<br />
Holmes, Su <strong>and</strong> Sean Redmond (eds) Celebrity Studies,.Taylor & Francis, Inc, Routledge, 2010.<br />
Inglis, Fred. A Short History of Celebrity. Princeton University Press, 2010.<br />
Roach, Joseph. It. The University of Michigan Press, 2007.<br />
Turner, Graeme, Celebrity. SAGE Publications, 2006.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
2 hours per week seminars x 11 weeks = 22 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
128 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Presentation Coursework 10 minutes 40 No N/A<br />
Long Form Essay Coursework 3500 words 60 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Michael<br />
McKinnie<br />
Digitally signed by Michael McKinnie<br />
DN: cn=Michael McKinnie, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=Department of Drama,<br />
email=m.mckinnie@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 11:02:31 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 128<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Renaissance Performance <strong>and</strong> the Lyric Voice<br />
Module Code ESH392<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date January 2012<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
Q321 English Literature by period<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 15 15 36<br />
2012/13 15 15 36<br />
2013/14 15 15 36
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module will be available for students on the English <strong>and</strong> all associated programmes <strong>and</strong> Associate students. It will be an<br />
optional module for students primarily in the final year of study (though will also be open to suitably qualified students in the<br />
second year). It will permit students with an interest in the literature of the English Renaissance to study the poetry of the period<br />
in more depth <strong>and</strong> in different ways. It will follow on naturally from the core level 4 module, Poetry: A Basic Course, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
popular level 5 course Early Modern Drama <strong>and</strong> Social Process (<strong>and</strong> its ‘further study option’). Thus, it will ensure that those<br />
students wishing to continue studying the period’s literature may learn about poetic, as well as theatrical texts, <strong>and</strong> that those<br />
with a broad interest in poetry may specialise in the Renaissance. Its performance elements will also be of interest to joint<br />
honours students of English <strong>and</strong> Drama.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
One lecturer<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Renaissance Performance <strong>and</strong> the Lyric Voice<br />
Module Code ESH392<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Gwilym Jones<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None<br />
None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
The flourishing of poetry in late early modern Engl<strong>and</strong> overlaps with the boom in theatre which saw Shakespeare’s plays staged.<br />
Those developments were interdependent, not just in the works of Shakespeare <strong>and</strong> fellow playwrights – Marlowe, Jonson,<br />
Middleton – who also wrote poetry, but in the poetic output of their audiences. Early modern London was a performative world,<br />
<strong>and</strong> we can approach its poetry through <strong>and</strong> as performance. We are comfortable viewing play texts as pieces of literature to be<br />
read. This is because we know that close reading such texts allows us to realise elements which remain hidden in performance. In<br />
this module, we reverse this trend to answer such questions as: what does the performance of poetry show us that reading does<br />
not? how does the drama of the period, <strong>and</strong> other types of performance, enable us to approach the poetry? to what extent is the<br />
lyric voice encapsulated by, or mediated through, forms of performance?
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
• To examine in close detail some key poems of the late 16th <strong>and</strong> early 17th century <strong>and</strong> to increase familiarity with the range of<br />
English poetry in this period;<br />
• To contextualize poems with reference to contemporary issues of performance (the public theatre boom, the theatrical sermon,<br />
the public executions, etc.);<br />
• To consider the above in relation to current theories on performance <strong>and</strong> poetry;<br />
• To familiarize students with performing poetry <strong>and</strong> the arguments for treating poetry as performance;<br />
• To use the poetic texts as a lens through which to think about key contexts <strong>and</strong> forces prevalent in the Renaissance (eg. the<br />
humoral body, censorship, the environment, travel, the English Empire etc.)<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
The poetry of the English Renaissance, in particular the works of John Donne, William Shakespeare, Ben Jonson,<br />
Isabella Whitney, Christopher Marlowe <strong>and</strong> George Herbert.<br />
The various concepts of 'performance' in early modern Engl<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the ways in which the cultural contexts of<br />
performance can be traced in the poetry.<br />
The competing theories of approaching poetry as <strong>and</strong> through performance.<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Analyse poetic texts with respect both to the cultural conditions of their production in the early modern period, <strong>and</strong><br />
to recent theories of literature <strong>and</strong> performance.<br />
Interpret poetry through performance <strong>and</strong> critically evaluate their interpretation <strong>and</strong> the performances of others.<br />
Propose, develop <strong>and</strong> defend their own ideas concerning the relationship of poetry <strong>and</strong> performance.<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Find appropriate primary <strong>and</strong> secondary materials to further their own independent study using online reproductions<br />
of early modern texts, electronic journals etc.<br />
Communicate effectively, in presentations <strong>and</strong> written work, using critical terminology appropriate to the study of<br />
literature <strong>and</strong> cultural history.<br />
Integrate their knowledge of renaissance poetry within the wider discipline of English Literature.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />
C 4<br />
Use their independent learning ability in continuing professional development.<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
Perform a poetic text with confidence <strong>and</strong> clarity.<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Week 1: Contexts of Renaissance Performance<br />
Selection of ballads.<br />
Andrew Gurr, ‘Physical Conditions’ in Playgoing in Shakespeare’s London, 3rd ed. (Cambridge: CUP, 2004), pp. 14-57.<br />
‘Rehearsal in the Theatres of Peter Quince <strong>and</strong> Ben Jonson’ in Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan (Oxford: OUP, 2000), 22-45.<br />
Week 2: Reading Poetry, Reading Performance<br />
Christopher Marlowe, ‘Hero <strong>and</strong> Le<strong>and</strong>er’; William Shakespeare, selection of sonnets.<br />
W.B. Worthen, extracts from ‘From Poetry to Performance’ in Drama: Between Poetry <strong>and</strong> Performance (Chichester: Wiley-<br />
Blackwell, 2009), pp. 35-93.<br />
‘Interiority: the sonnets, Hamlet <strong>and</strong> King Lear’ in David Schalkwyk Speech <strong>and</strong> Performance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets <strong>and</strong> Plays<br />
(Cambridge, CUP: 2002), pp. 102-149.<br />
Week 3: Gesture 1<br />
John Bulwer, Chirologia (London: 1642).<br />
From David Bevington, Action is Eloquence: Shakespeare’s Language of Gesture (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).<br />
Week 4: The Renaissance Body<br />
John Donne, ‘The Flea’, Holy Sonnet 14; George Herbert, ‘Sin’.<br />
From Robert Burton, The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621).<br />
From Noga Arikha, Passions <strong>and</strong> Tempers: A History of the Humours (New York: Harper Collins, 2009).<br />
Week 5: Gesture 2<br />
Shakespeare ‘Sonnet 29’; John Bulwer, Chirologia (London: 1642).<br />
Bruce R Smith, ‘How Should One Read a Shakespeare Sonnet?’ in Phenomenal Shakespeare (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010),<br />
pp. 38-82.<br />
Week 6: Performing the Religious Self<br />
Aemilia Lanyer, ‘Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum’; Selection of Donne’s religious poetry <strong>and</strong> sermons; Selection of George Herbert’s<br />
poetry.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />
Margaret Fetzer, Extracts from John Donne’s Performances: Sermons, Poems, Letters <strong>and</strong> Devotions (Manchester: MUP, 2010).<br />
Week 7: Reading Week<br />
Extracts from P. A. Skantze, Stillness <strong>and</strong> Motion in the Seventeenth-Century Theatre (London: Routledge, 2003) <strong>and</strong> W. B.<br />
Worthen, Shakespeare <strong>and</strong> the Authority of Performance (Cambridge, CUP. 1997).<br />
Week 8: In-Class Performance Assessment<br />
No prescribed reading.<br />
Week 9: Performing Emotions: Sorrow<br />
John Donne, ‘A Valediction Forbidding Mourning’, ‘A Valediction of Weeping’; Ben Jonson, ‘On My First Daughter’, ‘On My First<br />
Son’.<br />
‘Weeping on Stage’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Audiences Weeping’ from Matthew Steggle, Laughing <strong>and</strong> Weeping in the Early Modern Theatres<br />
(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 39-57; 81-99.<br />
Week 10: Performing Emotions: Love<br />
William Shakespeare, selection of sonnets; John Donne, selection of verse.<br />
John H. Astington, ‘Shadows, Jests <strong>and</strong> Counterfeits’ in Actors <strong>and</strong> Acting in Shakespeare’s Time: The Art of Stage Playing<br />
(Cambridge: CUP, 2010), pp. 12-38.<br />
Week 11: Performing Emotions: Joy <strong>and</strong> Laughter<br />
Selection of ballads; Ben Jonson, ‘Inviting a Friend to Supper’ <strong>and</strong> selected epigrams.<br />
‘Laughing on Stage’ <strong>and</strong> ‘Audiences Laughing’ from Matthew Steggle, Laughing <strong>and</strong> Weeping in the Early Modern Theatres<br />
(Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 25-38; 57-81.<br />
Week 12: Conclusion: Recontextualising Renaissance Performance<br />
Bruce R Smith, ‘As It Likes You’, in Phenomenal Shakespeare (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 1-37.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
2 hours per week in the form of seminars <strong>and</strong> workshops = 22 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
6 hours per week reading = 72 hours<br />
60 hours working on assessment.<br />
Total independent hours = 132<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
153 notional study hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Performance c. 5<br />
minutes per<br />
entrant..<br />
Critical reflection<br />
1,500 word limit.<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Devised performance of poem,<br />
<strong>and</strong> critical reflection.<br />
Coursework<br />
30 No N/A<br />
Independent Essay Coursework 3,000 words 70 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.09 10:21:33 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 129
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Staging the UK<br />
Module Code DRA253<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
W400 Drama<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
BA Drama<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 21 15 25<br />
2011/12 21 15 25<br />
2012/13 21 15 25
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The module is designed to:<br />
- bridge student learning (skills <strong>and</strong> content) across level 4's London/Culture/Performance <strong>and</strong> level 6's Theatre, Performance,<br />
Globalisation<br />
- extend students' opportunity to learn about theatre in national contexts (cf. modules on theatre in Irel<strong>and</strong>, South Africa <strong>and</strong><br />
Spain)<br />
- contextualise the Department's many modules on cultural practices in the metropolis of London <strong>and</strong> in international contexts<br />
- exploit extensive staff research in this area<br />
- be attractive to <strong>and</strong> beneficial for students, both 'regular' <strong>and</strong> Associate<br />
- contribute to the College's strategic aim to promote core values of citizenship, in local, national <strong>and</strong> international contexts.<br />
Optional<br />
Offered to students on the following programmes:<br />
BA Drama (W400)<br />
BA English <strong>and</strong> Drama (QW34)<br />
BA Film Studies <strong>and</strong> Drama (WW46)<br />
BA Russian <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR47)<br />
BA Hispanic Studies <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR44)<br />
BA German <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR42)<br />
BA French <strong>and</strong> Drama (WR41)<br />
plus Associate students<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Usual (teaching, room, AV)<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Usual (library, AV)<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Staging the UK<br />
Module Code DRA253<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Professor Jen Harvie<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module explores theatre in the UK, the conditions in which it happens, what it does <strong>and</strong> how this helps us underst<strong>and</strong> the UK<br />
<strong>and</strong> its cultures. Focusing (usually) on the twentieth <strong>and</strong> twenty-first centuries, it explores theatre practices including playwriting<br />
<strong>and</strong> performance, but also, for example, programming, design, festivals, directing, acting, reviewing, theatre-building, funding
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />
<strong>and</strong> policy-making. It focuses on examining this theatre’s cultural effects, from providing entertainment to supporting<br />
economies, modelling new modes of expression <strong>and</strong> articulating cultural identities.<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
To develop students’ underst<strong>and</strong>ing of UK theatre, its contexts <strong>and</strong> its effects (e.g. ideological, financial, cultural etc.)<br />
To develop students’ ability to examine cultural practices in context <strong>and</strong> to assess their effects<br />
To develop students’ skills in constructive discussion, critical reading <strong>and</strong> thinking, independent research <strong>and</strong> critical writing.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
theatre practices, their contexts <strong>and</strong> effects<br />
theoretical approaches to assessing culture<br />
key practices in theatre, such as its making, production, criticism, funding, etc.<br />
critical perspectives on this theatre<br />
relevant research sources <strong>and</strong> strategies for work in this area<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
analyse, synthesise <strong>and</strong> evaluate sources <strong>and</strong> arguments<br />
formulate <strong>and</strong> defend argument
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />
B 3<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
read critically<br />
write critically<br />
contribute constructively to critical discussion<br />
pursue independent research<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
manage a project<br />
work collaboratively with others<br />
execute independent research<br />
write critically<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Barker, Clive <strong>and</strong> Maggie B. Gale, British Theatre between the Wars, 1918-1939, 2001.<br />
D'Monte, Rebecca, <strong>and</strong> Graham Saunders, eds, Cool Britannia? British Political Drama in the 1990s,<br />
Freshwater, Helen, Theatre Censorship in Britain: Silencing, Censure <strong>and</strong> Suppression, 2009.<br />
Harvie, Jen, Staging the UK, 2005.<br />
Hingorani, Dominic, British Asian Theatre: Dramaturgy, Process <strong>and</strong> Performance, 2010.<br />
Holdsworth, Nadine, Joan Littlewood's Theatre, 2011.<br />
Holdsworth, Nadine, Theatre & Nation, 2010.<br />
Godiwala, Dimple, Alternatives Within the Mainstream: British Black <strong>and</strong> Asian Theatres, 2006.<br />
Kershaw, Baz, ed., The Cambridge History of British Theatre: Volume 3, Since 1985, 2004.<br />
Lacey, Stephen, British Realist Theatre: New Wave in Its Context, 1956-65, 1995.<br />
Little, Ruth, <strong>and</strong> Emily McLaughlin, The Royal Court Theatre Inside Out, 2007.<br />
Prior, Michael, Dreams <strong>and</strong> Reconstruction: a Cultural History of British Theatre: 1945-2006, 2006.<br />
O'Quinn, Daniel, <strong>and</strong> Jane Moody, eds, The Cambridge Companion to British Theatre, 1730-1830, 2007.<br />
Rebellato, Dan, 1956 <strong>and</strong> All That: Making of Modern British Drama, 1999.<br />
Shank, Theodore, Contemporary British Theatre, 1996.<br />
Shellard, Dominic, British Theatre Since the War, 2000.<br />
Shellard, Dominic, The Golden Generation: New Light on Post-war British Theatre, 2008.<br />
Shepherd, Simon, The Cambridge Introduction to Modern British Theatre, 2009.<br />
Sierz, Aleks, In-yer-face Theatre: British Drama Today, 2001.<br />
Sierz, Aleks, Rewriting the Nation: British Theatre Today, 2011.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Seminars: 2 hours/week = 22 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
student research <strong>and</strong> preparation, including 2 hours independent<br />
fieldwork per week: 6 hours/wk: 66 hours total; preparation of<br />
elements of assessment: 62 hours total = 128 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Short essay Coursework 1000 words 30% No N/A<br />
Longer essay Coursework 3000 words 70% Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 130<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Michael<br />
McKinnie<br />
Digitally signed by Michael McKinnie<br />
DN: cn=Michael McKinnie, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=Department of Drama,<br />
email=m.mckinnie@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 11:03:24 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title THE COURT OF HENRY VIII: THEN AND NOW<br />
Module Code ESH272<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
Q323 English Literature by topic<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 15 15 36<br />
2012/13 15 15 36
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module will be available for students on English <strong>and</strong> all associated programmes <strong>and</strong> Associate students. It will be an<br />
optional module for students primarily in the second year of study. This course is offered to address a shortage of early modern<br />
topics available for students at level 5, with the intention that this will encourage more uptake on early modern topics at level 6<br />
(particularly for Writing Renaissance Lives, which builds upon the the texts <strong>and</strong> topics covered in this module). The topic of the<br />
course addresses the significant interest in the reign of Henry VIII that has been created by fictionalized versions of the monarch<br />
found in recent historical novels, TV <strong>and</strong> film.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
One lecturer; AV equipped teaching room<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title THE COURT OF HENRY VIII: THEN AND NOW<br />
Module Code ESH272<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Ruth Ahnert<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
We all think we know who Henry VIII was. Some of us may have gleaned our impressions of Henry VIII through the novels of<br />
Philippa Gregory <strong>and</strong> Hilary Mantel, the recent television drama The Tudors, or through the exhibitions, events <strong>and</strong> public<br />
lectures that marked the 500th anniversary of Henry’s accession to the throne in 2009. These modern representations of the<br />
Tudor monarch have contributed to a multivalent, but nevertheless popularized, image within the public consciousness of this<br />
monarch <strong>and</strong> the court that surrounded him. This module will introduce you to the origins of this image-making. We will be<br />
examining a number of verbal <strong>and</strong> visual representations of Henry <strong>and</strong> his court dating from the king’s reign, alongside modern<br />
depictions of Henry found in novels, TV dramas <strong>and</strong> film. On a basic level, this will allow you to pinpoint some of the historical<br />
inaccuracies that modern fictionalized accounts have propagated. But it will also allow you to probe the accuracy of<br />
contemporary images of Henry’s court, <strong>and</strong> the extent to which these representations might today be labeled as ‘spin’ or<br />
propag<strong>and</strong>a. In this way the module will explore how the making of an icon is an ongoing process.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This course will:<br />
• Investigate the role of image-making in literature produced in <strong>and</strong> about the Henrician court;<br />
• Consider the relation between contemporary representations of Henry VIII’s court <strong>and</strong> their modern counterparts;<br />
• Consider the power of words <strong>and</strong> images to create a lasting reputation;<br />
• Develop skills in analysing literary, historical <strong>and</strong> artistic artifacts <strong>and</strong> discourses;<br />
• Raise questions about the function <strong>and</strong> perception of popular history;<br />
• Develop your capacity for research, presentation <strong>and</strong> essay writing.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
a range of texts, images <strong>and</strong> cultural artifacts emerging from the Tudor court<br />
the historical <strong>and</strong> political context in which these texts <strong>and</strong> artifacts were produced<br />
modern representations of Henry VIII in fiction, film, <strong>and</strong> popular history<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
evaluate how contemporary representations of the Tudor court compare to retrospective depictions<br />
debate the parallels between the image-making in Henry’s court with modern political ‘spin’<br />
apply this underst<strong>and</strong>ing in independent critical analysis of texts<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Research independently in primary <strong>and</strong> secondary literature <strong>and</strong> marshall evidence to produce an original argument<br />
Present opinions eloquently <strong>and</strong> in a well organised form to peers <strong>and</strong> teachers, both orally <strong>and</strong> in writing<br />
Reflect in a sophisticated manner on own performance <strong>and</strong> those of others, both in discussion <strong>and</strong> in writing
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Undertake independent research, <strong>and</strong> write up findings in an extended essay<br />
Deliver a ten-minute oral presentation<br />
Debate professionally <strong>and</strong> coherently with peers <strong>and</strong> teachers<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Week 1 - Introduction: Images of Henry, from Holbein to Hollywood<br />
• Please prepare by looking at the gallery of images of Henry VIII on the VLE<br />
• Tatiana C. String, ‘Projecting masculinity: Henry VIII’s codpiece’, in Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> his Afterlives: Literature, Politics, <strong>and</strong> Art<br />
(Cambridge, 2009), pp. 143-59<br />
Week 2 - Court Culture I: Music, masques <strong>and</strong> dancing<br />
• Sir Thomas Elyot, The Book Named the Governor (1531), pp. xiii-xiv, 20-26, 69-94<br />
• Skiles Howard, ‘”Ascending the Riche Mount”: Performing Hierarchy <strong>and</strong> Gender in the Henrician Masque’, in Rethinking the<br />
Henrician Era: Essays on Early Tudor Texts <strong>and</strong> Contexts, ed. Peter C. Herman (Urbana <strong>and</strong> Chicago, 1994), pp. 16-39<br />
Week 3 - Court Culture II: Drama<br />
• John Heywood, The Play of the Weather<br />
Week 4 - Reconstructing the Court: class trip to Hampton Court<br />
Week 5 - Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> Anne Boleyn<br />
• Selected verse by Sir Thomas Wyatt<br />
• Eric Ives, The Life <strong>and</strong> Death of Anne Boleyn: The most happy’ (Oxford, 2004), pp. 63-80<br />
Week 6 - Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> Anne Boleyn in popular culture<br />
• The Other Boleyn Girl<br />
Week 7 - R E A D I N G W E E K<br />
Week 8 - Writing Under Tyranny<br />
• Selected verse by John Skelton, Thomas Wyatt, <strong>and</strong> Henry Howard, the Earl of Surrey<br />
• Greg Walker, Writing Under Tyranny: English Literature <strong>and</strong> the Henrician Reformation (Oxford, 2005), pp. 415-432<br />
Week 9 - Henry VIII, Thomas More <strong>and</strong> the Reformation<br />
• Excerpts from Thomas More, The Confutation of Tyndale’s Answer (1532)<br />
• John N. King, ‘Thomas More, William Tyndale, <strong>and</strong> the Printing of Religious Propag<strong>and</strong>a’, in The Oxford H<strong>and</strong>book of Tudor<br />
literature, 1485-1603, ed. Mike Pincombe <strong>and</strong> Cathy Shrank (Oxford, 2009), pp. 105-20.<br />
Week 10 - Henry VIII <strong>and</strong> Thomas More in popular culture<br />
• Selected prison letters by Thomas More<br />
• Peter Marshall, ‘Saints <strong>and</strong> Cinemas: A Man for All Seasons’, in Tudors <strong>and</strong> Stuarts on Film, ed. Susan Doran <strong>and</strong> Thomas S.<br />
Freeman (Basingstoke, 2009), pp. 46-60<br />
Week 11 - Course review <strong>and</strong> discussion of essay plans<br />
Week 12 - Essay consultations
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Most of the course will be delivered in 2-hour lecture-discussions.<br />
‘Lecture-discussion’ just means that the lecturing will be broken up<br />
with periods of class discussion <strong>and</strong> small-group activities (20 hrs).<br />
There will be one trip to Hampton Court (6 hrs).<br />
Individual essay consultations (15 mins) will be provided at the end<br />
of term over weeks 11 <strong>and</strong> 12.<br />
Total number of teaching contact hours: 26.25<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
5-8 hours preparatory reading per week (around 55 hours)<br />
plus approximately 65 hours on assessment<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
146 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
10 minute oral presentation on<br />
set text<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Coursework 10 minutes 10% No n/a<br />
Learning journal, with seven<br />
entries<br />
Coursework<br />
1,400-1,750<br />
words<br />
30% No n/a<br />
Essay Coursework 3,000 words 60% Yes n/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 10:44:28 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 131<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title The crisis of culture: literature <strong>and</strong> politics, 1918-1948<br />
Module Code ESH270<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
Q300 English studies<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 50 10 100<br />
2012/13 50 10 100<br />
2013/14 50 10 100
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
To assist the modern Subject Area Group in English to manage better the numbers of students taking its courses across the 3<br />
years of the undergraduate degree, I was asked if I could re-shape The crisis of culture... - previously a Level 6 course - as a Level 5<br />
course. With some adjustments to its content, this is easily possible, <strong>and</strong> so I am withdrawing it as a Level 6 course, <strong>and</strong> reoffering<br />
it as a Level 5 course. The Level 5 version has fewer texts on the syllabus than its Level 6 counterpart, <strong>and</strong> more<br />
dem<strong>and</strong>ing texts have been substituted with ones more appropriate to Level 5.<br />
This module would therefore be offered as an option at Level 5, <strong>and</strong> would be aimed at 2nd year undergraduates (single <strong>and</strong><br />
joint honours) <strong>and</strong> Associate students in the Department of English. It is might also be of interest to students from History <strong>and</strong><br />
Politics departments. It complements, although it does not strictly follow, ESH102 Reading, Theory <strong>and</strong> Interpretation, in that it<br />
picks up the analytical skills acquired in that course. It supplements other level 5 courses such as ESH213 Modernism, ESH261 The<br />
colonial novel (with its attention to 20thC British imperialism), ESH266 World Travellers, <strong>and</strong> ESH256 Writing the First World War.<br />
Taking into account its "political" content, it sets up a pathway to ESH350 Modernism <strong>and</strong> Democracy, as well as anticipating<br />
ESH330 Virginia Woolf, <strong>and</strong> ESH381 Lawrence.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
lecturing staff<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title The crisis of culture: literature <strong>and</strong> politics, 1918-1948<br />
Module Code ESH270<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Katie Fleming<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
The years following the First World War saw dramatic social, cultural, <strong>and</strong> political changes in British life. Despite the radical<br />
global developments which followed the Second World War, the paradigm shift in British cultural life, the sense that one age had<br />
ended, <strong>and</strong> another – darker, more complex, less certain – epoch had begun, occurred in the aftermath of the trench wars in<br />
Europe. This course will explore the ways in which the writers of the period engaged with its turbulent politics.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
• Through a variety of different genres – novels, essays, <strong>and</strong> poems – this course aims to chart this period of political turbulence,<br />
as it was seen, understood, <strong>and</strong> represented by those who lived through <strong>and</strong> participated in it.<br />
• Students will be encouraged to examine <strong>and</strong> critique the complex, often contradictory, politics of the writers they study, <strong>and</strong> to<br />
ask what place the intellectual plays in the formation of a country’s political consciousness, <strong>and</strong> vice versa.<br />
• Students will also be challenged to explore the cultural effects of the politics of the 20s, 30s, <strong>and</strong> 40s: e.g. how did the political<br />
allegiances of the writers of the 1930s transform the literary scene?; how did (anxiety about) Britain’s empire inform the political<br />
l<strong>and</strong>scape?; how did the British political <strong>and</strong> cultural experience differ from that of mainl<strong>and</strong> Europe?<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
a number of authors <strong>and</strong> texts from the period 1918-1948<br />
literary, cultural <strong>and</strong> socio-historical contexts in which the core texts were written <strong>and</strong> read<br />
the relationship between literature <strong>and</strong> politics<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
demonstrate the critical skills of close reading, description, <strong>and</strong> analysis of the core texts of the course<br />
show awareness of how different political <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts affect the nature of writing <strong>and</strong> meaning<br />
comm<strong>and</strong> rhetorical skills of effective communication <strong>and</strong> argument, both oral <strong>and</strong> written<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
analyse <strong>and</strong> critically examine diverse forms of literary-political discourse
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
demonstrate advanced literacy <strong>and</strong> communication skills <strong>and</strong> the ability to apply these in appropriate contexts,<br />
including the ability to present sustained <strong>and</strong> persuasive written <strong>and</strong> oral arguments cogently <strong>and</strong> coherently<br />
acquire substantial quantities of complex information of diverse kinds in a structured <strong>and</strong> systematic way involving<br />
the use of the distinctive interpretative skills of the subject<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
adapt <strong>and</strong> transfer the critical methods of the discipline to a variety of working environments.<br />
demonstrate competence in the planning <strong>and</strong> execution of essays, presentations, <strong>and</strong> other<br />
writing work.<br />
work with <strong>and</strong> in relation to others through the presentation of ideas <strong>and</strong> information <strong>and</strong> the collective negotiation<br />
of solutions<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Week 1: Introductory lecture<br />
Week 2: Disenchantment <strong>and</strong> the aftermath of WWI<br />
Robert Graves, Goodbye to all that<br />
Week 3: Mass <strong>and</strong> elite<br />
F.R. Leavis, "Mass Civilisation <strong>and</strong> Minority Culture"; T.S. Eliot, "Notes towards the definition of culture", "The Idea of a Christian<br />
Society"<br />
Week 4: The crisis of democracy & fascism<br />
Wyndham Lewis, extracts, The Art of Being Ruled; Hitler<br />
Week 5: Militarism & Imperialism<br />
George Orwell, "Shooting an Elephant"; Virginia Woolf, extract, Three Guineas<br />
Week 6: Politics & patriarchy<br />
Virginia Woolf, The Years<br />
Week 7: Reading week<br />
Week 8: Weimar <strong>and</strong> the rise of Nazism<br />
Christopher Isherwood, Goodbye to Berlin<br />
Week 9: The Spanish Civil War<br />
George Orwell, Homage to Catalonia<br />
Week 10: The Munich Crisis<br />
Louis MacNeice, Autumn Journal<br />
Week 11: London <strong>and</strong> the war<br />
Elizabeth Bowen, The Heat of the Day<br />
Week 12: consultations for final essay
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
1 hour lecture followed by 1 hour seminar (22 hours teaching in<br />
total)<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
8 hours reading per week (core text plus secondary material) = 72<br />
hours (2 weeks no assigned reading); 56 hours working on<br />
assessment<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 notional study hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Group in-class presentation<br />
(collaborative)<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Coursework 500 15 No n/a<br />
Book review Coursework 1000 25 No n/a<br />
Final essay Coursework 2500 60 Yes n/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 10:48:54 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 132
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />
Module Code ESH388<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
Q300 English studies<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of English & Drama<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
English<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 36 10 54<br />
2012/13 36 10 54<br />
2013/14 36 10 54
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module will be offered at Level 6 to single <strong>and</strong> joint honours undergraduate degree programmes in English <strong>and</strong> Associate<br />
students. It will provide students who have taken modules in early literature with an opportunity to further their interest in the<br />
literature of the seventeenth century. Building on the School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama’s substantial module offerings in the early<br />
period, this module will enable students to gain a deeper underst<strong>and</strong>ing of seventeenth-century culture <strong>and</strong> society by exploring<br />
the reasons for <strong>and</strong> the rationale behind the different kinds of life writing produced in this period.<br />
Students are introduced to the medieval <strong>and</strong> early modern periods in the first year ESH110 Literatures in Time <strong>and</strong> ESH101<br />
Shakespeare modules.<br />
Biographies <strong>and</strong> auto-biographies abound in modern culture, from best-seller lists to the cinema screen, but the term ‘biography’<br />
is a late-seventeenth-century departure from the early modern experience of fashioning the self. This module seeks to explore<br />
early modern selfhood as written, perceived <strong>and</strong> experienced, <strong>and</strong> takes as the focus of its study all such early modern forms of<br />
life writing as narrative, performance, story <strong>and</strong> text.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Lecturer<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives<br />
Module Code ESH388<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Tamara Atkin<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module explores some of the ways in which some seventeenth-century lives were given recorded shape in texts <strong>and</strong><br />
documents. It works with both historical records <strong>and</strong> literary constructions, <strong>and</strong> investigates the different imperatives which<br />
prompted the literary construction of selfhood <strong>and</strong> identity in a variety of patterns. There will be opportunities to consider<br />
influential ideas <strong>and</strong> modes of life writing <strong>and</strong> to question some aspects of the wider theorizing of biographical <strong>and</strong><br />
autobiographical writing as they relate to the early modern period (the notion of renaissance self-fashioning, for example). Texts<br />
studied will include wills, letters, personal memoirs, diaries, martyrologies, poems, <strong>and</strong> plays.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
1. To gain a deeper underst<strong>and</strong>ing of seventeenth-century texts by exploring a range of different forms of life writing<br />
2. To consider the various incarnations of selfhood in the seventeenth century<br />
3. To develop skills in analyzing literary, historical, <strong>and</strong> artistic artefacts <strong>and</strong> discourses<br />
4. To build students’ capacity for research, presentation, <strong>and</strong> essay writing<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A variety of different genres of seventeenth-century life writing<br />
The cultural context for the concepts of selfhood in the seventeenth-century<br />
Current critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical discussions about the construction of selfhood in the seventeenth century<br />
The connections <strong>and</strong> distinctions between different writers, genres, texts, <strong>and</strong> periods<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
Grasp the wider cultural, social, historical, <strong>and</strong> ethical implications of the subject of the module<br />
Engage with <strong>and</strong> develop critical <strong>and</strong> theoretical modes of inquiry<br />
H<strong>and</strong>le <strong>and</strong> deploy relevant concepts, contexts, <strong>and</strong> terminology<br />
Describe, analyze, <strong>and</strong> evaluate primary <strong>and</strong> secondary texts<br />
Transferable skills - able to:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
C 5<br />
Write persuasively <strong>and</strong> critically<br />
Communicate <strong>and</strong> present ideas orally<br />
Effectively organize <strong>and</strong> manage time<br />
Work towards deadlines<br />
Engage in <strong>and</strong> contribute to discussions, debates, <strong>and</strong> projects with peers<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
Apply critical thinking to an independently developed research project<br />
Compile a bibliography<br />
Identify the most relevant arguments, evidence, <strong>and</strong> resources in both primary <strong>and</strong> secondary material<br />
Make effective use of library <strong>and</strong> computer resources <strong>and</strong> research aids<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
The reading for this course will consist predominantly of primary texts, which will be supplemented by extracts from secondary<br />
critical <strong>and</strong> historical material. Primary texts will include the following:<br />
Week 1 - Introduction - Writing Seventeenth-Century Lives - No primary reading<br />
Week 2 - Literary Lives I<br />
Ben Jonson, selection from The Complete Poems, ed. by George Parfitt (1988)<br />
Week 3 - Literary Lives II<br />
Fulke Greville, Life of Sir Philip Sidney, Etc., First Published 1652 (2010)<br />
Week 4 - Lives in Brief<br />
Aubrey's Brief Lives, ed. by Oliver Lawson Dick (1972)<br />
Week 5 - Women's Life Writing I<br />
Margaret Cavendish, 'A True Relation of my Birth, Breeding, Life', in <strong>Paper</strong> Bodies: A Margaret Cavendish Reader, ed. by<br />
Sylvia Bowerbank <strong>and</strong> Sara Mendelson (2000)<br />
Week 6 - Women's Life Writing II<br />
The Diaries of Lady Anne Clifford, ed. by D. J. H. Clifford (1992)<br />
Week 7 - READING WEEK<br />
Week 8 - Spiritual Autobiography<br />
Agnes Beaumont, 'The Narrative of the Persecution of Agnes Beaumont', in Grace Abounding with Other Spiritual<br />
Autobiographies, ed. by John Stachniewski (2008<br />
John Bunyan, 'Grace Abounding', in Grace Abounding with Other Spiritual Autobiographies, ed. by John Stachniewski<br />
(2008)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
Week 9 - Diarizing Lives<br />
John Beadle, A Journal or Diary of a Thankful Christian, ed. by Germaine Fry Murray (1996)<br />
The Diary of Samuel Pepys: A Selection, ed. by Robert Latham (2003)<br />
Week 10 - Majestic Lives<br />
Francis Bacon, The History of the Reign of King Henry VII, ed. by Brian Vickers (1998)<br />
Week 11 - Transforming Lives<br />
Robert Daborne, 'A Christian Turned Turk', in Three Turk Plays from Early Modern Engl<strong>and</strong>, ed. by Daniel J. Vitkus (2000)<br />
Thomas Warmstry, The Baptized Turk, EEBO edition<br />
Week 12 - Lives in Pictures<br />
Visit to the National Portrait Gallery
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
11 seminars (22 hours in total), 1 museum visit (2 hours in total).<br />
Total student/lecturer interactive time: 24 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Total student independent learning time: 126 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
Total module notional study time: 150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
11 x 200-500<br />
word entries<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Log Book<br />
Coursework<br />
30 No N/A<br />
Researched Essay Coursework 3000 words 70 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Chris Reid<br />
Digitally signed by Chris Reid<br />
DN: cn=Chris Reid, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of English <strong>and</strong> Drama,<br />
email=c.g.p.reid@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.08 18:40:01 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 133<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Module Proposal(s)<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Brazilian Cities in Cinema<br />
Ethnography of Communication (Level 6)<br />
Ethnography of Communication ((Level 7)<br />
Experimental Linguistics<br />
Linguistic Typology <strong>and</strong> Grammatical Theory<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
No significant issues identified.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Brazilian Cities in Cinema: Towards the Olympics <strong>and</strong> the World Cup<br />
Module Code POR4<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
R590 Portuguese studies not elsewhere classified<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
N/a<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
N/A<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Hispanic Studies<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 20 6 40<br />
2012/13 25 6 40<br />
2013/14 30 6 40
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module will be an option for students of Hispanic Studies <strong>and</strong>/or Portuguese, <strong>and</strong> available to other students in SLLF,<br />
especially Film Studies.<br />
It will replace the current module POR101 Brazilian Cultural Studies, shifting the emphasis to the medium of cinema. It explores<br />
the link between city <strong>and</strong> cinema (eg Shiel <strong>and</strong> Fitzmaurice), enhancing the interdisciplinarity with Film Studies which makes<br />
Lusophone studies in the School distinctive in the UK, has attracted more funding <strong>and</strong> generated more innovative research. The<br />
shift also paves the way for a future programme proposal for joint honours BA in Portuguese <strong>and</strong> Film Studies.<br />
São Paulo, a major chunk of this module, had never been taught before; this further implies the inclusion of the agenda of<br />
globalization. History is another component of this proposal which further broadens the time span from the 19th century to the<br />
present day. It broadens the focus on Rio beyond music. Salvador's Afro-Brazilian culture (C<strong>and</strong>omblé <strong>and</strong> Capoeira) is also seen<br />
as conflict through the lens of Cinema Novo. What remains close to POR101 is Brasília.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Existing Brazilian Studies <strong>and</strong> Film Studies facilities<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Brazilian Cities in Cinema: Towards the Olympics <strong>and</strong> the World Cup<br />
Module Code POR4<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 4 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Professor Else R. P. Vieira<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module introduces students to the way cinema represents four Brazilian cities: a) Rio de Janeiro: its wonders, exoticism <strong>and</strong><br />
the spectacle of its Carnival contrasting with the over-sensationalized violence on the screen; its unique status as the seat of the<br />
Portuguese monarchy <strong>and</strong> colony in the 19th Century; b) São Paulo: social mobility <strong>and</strong> stagnation in the complexity of a city the<br />
size of Lebanon; the impact of technology <strong>and</strong> traffic on its social networks; the Gardens <strong>and</strong> financial high-rises of the epicentre<br />
of an emerging global power contrasting with underclass pockets; its industrialization in the 1950s <strong>and</strong> 1960s, <strong>and</strong> the rise of the<br />
Labour Unions' political power; c) Salvador: its vibrant Afro-Brazilian culture contrasting with Cinema Novo's depiction of power<br />
hierarchies <strong>and</strong> cultural conflicts; d) Brasília: projections of utopia in the urban planning of Brazil's Modernist capital.<br />
No previous knowledge of Portuguese is required, as all the films studied are available in English or with English subtitles.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The module aims to<br />
1) Introduce the history <strong>and</strong> culture of four Brazilian cities through their representation in cinema;<br />
2) Analyse achievements <strong>and</strong> tensions informing Brazil as an emerging power;<br />
3) Develop students' awareness of the way film creates certain images of cities;<br />
4) Develop students' awareness of film as interpretation of culture;<br />
5) Assess the achievements of Brazilian film directors <strong>and</strong> otherwise (eg Camus) in portraying Brazilian culture.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
A 4<br />
A 5<br />
Brazilian Culture;<br />
Brazilian cities <strong>and</strong> their regional <strong>and</strong> historical specificities;<br />
Essential terminology <strong>and</strong> key concepts related to Brazilian culture;<br />
The role of film in projecting the culture of specific cities;<br />
The film language developed by film directors to portray urban Brazilian Culture ;<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
B 4<br />
B 5<br />
B 6<br />
Critically assess the achievement of film as interpretation of culture;<br />
Identify the specificities of Brazilian cities <strong>and</strong> culture in different regions<br />
Situate Brazil in the context of the globalized world.<br />
Develop an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the specificities of global cities<br />
Assess gaps in academic <strong>and</strong> filmic representations of Brazilian major cities<br />
Analyse the impact of historical events on the configuration of today's cities
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
C 4<br />
Research <strong>and</strong> synthesise relevant information from cultural theorists with appropriate citation<br />
Research <strong>and</strong> synthesise relevant information from film scholarship on cinematrographic cities with appropriate<br />
citation<br />
Develop a coherent argument <strong>and</strong> exercise critical judgement<br />
Work independently, demonstrating initiative, self-organisation <strong>and</strong> time-management<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
Argue <strong>and</strong> communicate perceptions through essays.<br />
Research information on the internet<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Set Films (equivalent films can also be used)<br />
"1808" (Laurentino Gomes, 2008) on Rio as a the seat of the Portuguese Monarchy<br />
"Black Orpheus" (1959, Camus) on the favela culture of Rio in the 1950s<br />
"Bossa Nova" (Bruno Barreto, 2000) on Rio´s upper class beach <strong>and</strong> culture in the 1960s<br />
"Pure Brazil: Bossa Nova in Rio" (João Elias Ribeiro Jr, 2007)<br />
"City of Men" (Fern<strong>and</strong>o Meirelles, 2002-05) <strong>and</strong>/or Maré (Lúcia Murat, 2008) on today´s social gaps <strong>and</strong> favelas:<br />
Clips from " The Payer of Promises (Anselmo Duarte, 1962) on the conflicts of cultural syncretism in Salvador<br />
"Dona Flor <strong>and</strong> her two Husb<strong>and</strong>s" (Bruno Barreto, 1976) on Salvador´s religious syncretism <strong>and</strong> on mal<strong>and</strong>roism<br />
"Brasília 18%" (Nelson Pereira dos Santos, 2006); <strong>and</strong> documentaries on Brasília's Modernism <strong>and</strong> its tensions<br />
"All for Nothing" (Philippe Barcinsky, 2007), on São Paulo <strong>and</strong> its traffic <strong>and</strong> technology<br />
"Motoboys " (Caíto Ortiz, 2002) on São Paulo <strong>and</strong> its traffic<br />
"The Sign of the City" (Carlos Alberto Riccelli, 2007) on São Paulo, technology-enhanced networks of solidarity<br />
" Linha de Passe" (Walter Salles, 2008) on the survival strategies of the lower class<br />
"The ABC of Strikes" (Leon Hirzman, 1979/1990) <strong>and</strong>/or "Lula. the Son of Brazil" (Fábio Barreto, 2009) on São Paulo's Unionism<br />
RELEVANT CHAPTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING BOOKS WILL BE USED:<br />
Reference Books:<br />
*Skidmore, Thomas E. Brazil, Five Centuries of Change. OUP, 1999.<br />
*Da Mata, Roberto. Carnival, Rogues <strong>and</strong> Heroes: Interpretation of the Brazilian Dilemma. Transl. John DruryRio de Janeiro: Rocco,<br />
1997.. University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.<br />
*Freyre, Gilberto. Masters <strong>and</strong> Slaves: A Study in the Development of Brazilian Civilization. Transl. Rod W. Horton. Greenwood<br />
Publishing Group, 1980.<br />
*Santos, M. A urbanização brasileira. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1993.<br />
*Schwarz, Roberto. Misplaced Ideas: Essays on Brazilian Culture. Transl <strong>and</strong> introduced by John Gledson. Verso, 1996<br />
Specific Books<br />
*Castro, Ruy. Bossa Nova: The Story of the Brazilian Music that Seduced the World. A Capella Books, 2000.<br />
*McGowan, Chris <strong>and</strong> Pessanha, Ricardo. The Brazilian Sound: Bossa Nova <strong>and</strong> the Popular Music of Brazil. Temple UP, 1997.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />
*Harding, Rachel E. A Refuge in Thunder: C<strong>and</strong>omblé <strong>and</strong> Alternative Spaces of Blackness. Indiana University Press, 2000.<br />
*Hanchard, Micahel. Racial politics in contemporary Brazil. Durham: Duke University Press, 1999.<br />
*Kraay, Heindreik. Afro-Brazilian Culture <strong>and</strong> Politics: Bahia, 1790s to 1990. New York: M.E. Sharpe Inc., 1998.<br />
*Holston, James. The Modernist City: An Anthropological Critique of Brasília. University of Chicago Press, 1989.<br />
*James, P. E. Rio de Janeiro <strong>and</strong> São Paulo. Geographical Review. 23(2):271-98.<br />
*Kowarick, Lúcio. Social Struggles <strong>and</strong> the City: The Case of São Paulo. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1993.<br />
*Underwood, David Kendrick. Oscar Niemeyer <strong>and</strong> Brazilian Free-Form Modernism. George Braziller Publishers, 1994.<br />
*Nagib, Lúcia (ed). The New Brazilian Cinema. London <strong>and</strong> New York: I.B.Taurus, 2003.<br />
*Vieira, Else R P (ed). City of God in Several Voices: Brazilian Social Cinema as Social Action. Nottingham: CCC Press, 2005.<br />
*Sassen, S. A Sociology of Globalization. London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2007.<br />
*Sassen, S. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1991.<br />
Cohen, R. And Kennedy, P. Gobal Sociology. London: Macmillan, 2000.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures (1 hour per week)<br />
Seminars (1 hour per week)<br />
Film Screening sessions (1 hour per week)<br />
Individual <strong>and</strong> collective feedback sessions as required<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
117<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Essay Coursework 1,500 words 40% No N/a<br />
Essay Coursework 2,500 words 60% Yes N/a<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Essay 2 Coursework 2500 words<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Ruediger<br />
Goerner<br />
Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />
DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />
Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />
email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.11 10:30:40 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 134<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />
Module Code LIN6<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Q140 Sociolinguistics<br />
Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 30 6 40<br />
2012/13 30 6 40<br />
2013/14 30 6 40
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This is an optional module for the BA programmes offered through the Linguistics Department (English Language <strong>and</strong><br />
Linguistics, English Literature <strong>and</strong> Linguistics, Comparative Literature <strong>and</strong> Linguistics, <strong>and</strong> [X] Language <strong>and</strong> Linguistics). It has<br />
been running since 2002 as a Level 5 module (LIN006) in connection with a follow-on Level 6 module (LIN307).<br />
The module introduces students to an important area of linguistic research (the ethnolinguistic/linguistic anthropological<br />
framework) which examines communication patterns within groups in society, focusing on the ways language <strong>and</strong> social<br />
meanings are understood by its speakers.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />
Module Code LIN6<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Colleen Cotter<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
LIN400, LIN102; or permission of<br />
instructor<br />
LIN006; LINtbc-level7<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module provides an overview of ethnography of communication, a theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological approach to analyzing<br />
<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing a wide range of communicative patterns <strong>and</strong> language uses as they occur within social <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts.<br />
Students will also apply ethnographic insights <strong>and</strong> methodologies to fieldwork activities <strong>and</strong> projects in the local community,<br />
investigating the range of practices that constitute ethnographic research, aiming for an integrative <strong>and</strong> holistic underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
through discussion of class members’ fieldwork activities.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
1) To develop underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the framework<br />
2) To become familiar with the primary literature<br />
3) To engage in fieldwork activities <strong>and</strong> learn how to conduct them<br />
4) To critically assess field data in relation to the concepts from the readings<br />
5) To learn how to maintain an annotated bibliography <strong>and</strong> develop a field notebook<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
ethnography of communication as a linguistic framework<br />
theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological tenets behind the framework<br />
what constitutes ethnographic fieldwork<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
critically consider the relationship between theory, method, <strong>and</strong> data<br />
develop a research project with a London focus<br />
assess fieldwork practice as well as data<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
conduct field interviews<br />
develop collegial relationships<br />
talk about one's research
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
talk to members of the public <strong>and</strong> present complex ideas to outsiders (academic <strong>and</strong> otherwise)<br />
conduct semi-structured interviews<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2003. The Ethnography of Communication (Wiley-Blackwell)<br />
Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, <strong>and</strong> Work in Communities <strong>and</strong> Classrooms (CUP)<br />
Agar, Michael. 1986. Speaking of Ethnography (Sage)<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
A combination of lecture/seminar (2 hours) each week. Towards the<br />
end students apply insights from their own fieldwork in relation to<br />
the literature, culminating in a poster session.<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Students will spend 6-8 hours each week reading <strong>and</strong> taking notes<br />
on the primary literature discussed in class as well as engaging in<br />
independent student fieldwork <strong>and</strong> writing up field notes<br />
(approximately 3-5 hours/week) in the second half of the semester.<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
field homeworks Coursework 1500 words 50% No NA<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
field notebook, essay Coursework 2500 words 50% Yes NA<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Essay that synthesizes <strong>and</strong> applies concepts Coursework 2000 words<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Ruediger<br />
Goerner<br />
Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />
DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />
Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />
email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.02.03 12:40:13 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 135<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />
Module Code LIN7<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />
Q140 Sociolinguistics<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 6 30<br />
2012/13 12 6 30<br />
2013/14 15 6 30
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This is an optional module for the MA in linguistics. The module will introduce students to an important area of linguistic<br />
research (the Ethnography of Communication framework) that examines language <strong>and</strong> culture in t<strong>and</strong>em, focusing on the ways<br />
social meaning is instantiated in language <strong>and</strong> understood by its speakers.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Appropriate teaching space with AV connections; VLE; updated library resources<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Ethnography of Communication - Foundations <strong>and</strong> Fieldwork<br />
Module Code LIN7<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr Colleen Cotter<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
LIN006, LINtbc-Level6<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module provides an overview of Ethnography of Communication, a theoretical <strong>and</strong> methodological approach to analyzing<br />
<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing communicative patterns <strong>and</strong> language use in social <strong>and</strong> cultural contexts. The focus on primary literature<br />
includes the seminal figures who established the approach (e.g., Hymes, Gumperz), developed the framework (Baumann, Briggs,<br />
Ervin-Tripp, Philipps), <strong>and</strong> who continue to advance it today (Duranti, Goodwin, Hill, Rampton). Applying ethnographic insights<br />
<strong>and</strong> methodologies to fieldwork activities <strong>and</strong> projects in the local community will instill underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the broad range of<br />
practices that constitute doing ethnography as well as illustrate the points raised in the literature.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
(i) To develop familiarity with the key literature.<br />
(ii) To learn to maintain an ongoing annotated bibliography.<br />
(iii) To apply theoretical concepts from the readings to local field research contexts.<br />
(iv) To make students familiar with the ethnographic approach to analyzing language in social contexts.<br />
(v) To provide students with an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of a major thread of sociolinguistic research.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
key aspects of ethnography of communication<br />
relationships among language, context, <strong>and</strong> culture -- for the linguist <strong>and</strong> for the researched<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
assess theoretical approach <strong>and</strong> argument<br />
construct evidence-based arguments<br />
deal with fieldwork issues alongside analytical ones<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
conduct independent learning via the primary literature<br />
make contact with prospective field consultants in the community<br />
C 3
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
present complex ideas to a professional audience<br />
talk to members of the public (through fieldwork interactions <strong>and</strong> dissemination of research)<br />
maintain an annotated bibliography<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Agar, Michael. 1996. The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography (<strong>Academic</strong> Press)<br />
Bauman, Richard <strong>and</strong> Joel Sherzer. 1989. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (CUP)<br />
Briggs, Charles. 1986. Learning How to Ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research (CUP)<br />
Duranti, Aless<strong>and</strong>ro. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology (CUP)<br />
Duranti, Aless<strong>and</strong>ro. 2001. Key Terms in Language <strong>and</strong> Culture (Wiley-Blackwell)<br />
Emerson, Robert et al. 1995. Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes (U Chicago Press)<br />
Heath, Shirley Brice. 1983. Ways with Words: Language, Life, <strong>and</strong> Work in Communities <strong>and</strong> Classrooms (CUP)<br />
Saville-Troike, Muriel. 2003. Ethnography of Communication (Wiley-Blackwell)<br />
Articles in Language in Society (primary journal)<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
A combination of lecture (2 hours) <strong>and</strong> seminar (1 hour) each week.<br />
In seminars, students will be expected to discuss themes <strong>and</strong> issues<br />
from readings. Towards the end of the module, students will also<br />
lead some discussions in lectures that relate to the core literature, as<br />
well as applying insights from their own field contexts in relation to<br />
theory, methodology, <strong>and</strong> data.<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Each week, students should spend about 10 hours reading <strong>and</strong><br />
taking notes on the primary literature discussed in the class.<br />
Towards the end of the module, this will include 3-4 hours spent in<br />
preparing their presentations.<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
field homeworks, journal Coursework 1500 words 40% No NA<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
essay with annotated<br />
bibliography<br />
Coursework 2500 words 50% Yes NA<br />
seminar presentation/poster Coursework NA 10% No NA<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Essay that synthesizes <strong>and</strong> applies concepts Coursework 4000 words<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Ruediger<br />
Goerner<br />
Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />
DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />
Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />
email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.02.03 12:41:46 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 136<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Experimental Linguistics<br />
Module Code LIN6..<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Q150 Psycholinguistics<br />
Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
SLLF<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 12 6 24<br />
2012/13 16 6 24<br />
2013/14 20 6 24
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
This module is an optional final year module, designed to be particularly useful to any students considering using experimental<br />
tools for their dissertations. The module provides students with a concrete grounding in the tools <strong>and</strong> methods of Experimental<br />
Linguistics, which will enable them to design, implement <strong>and</strong> analyze experiments of their own <strong>and</strong> to engage with the<br />
published Psycholinguistics literature. Experimental tools <strong>and</strong> techniques are increasingly being adopted by theoretical <strong>and</strong><br />
socio-linguists to address critical research questions.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Appropriate teaching space. VLE access. Update of library resources. Access to<br />
Experimental Linguistics lab (including computers designated for experimental<br />
design <strong>and</strong> analysis).<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Experimental Linguistics<br />
Module Code LIN6..<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Linnaea Stockall<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
The goal of this module is to take students with no prior training in the methods or tools of experimental psychological science<br />
<strong>and</strong> provide them with the theoretical <strong>and</strong> practical training required to be able to critically engage with the Psycholinguistics<br />
literature <strong>and</strong> to undertake experimental linguistics research themselves. The module will include h<strong>and</strong>s-on training in inferential<br />
statistics <strong>and</strong> hypothesis testing, experimental design, data collection (including training in ethical human subjects research<br />
protocols), <strong>and</strong> data analysis. The module will also engage students in considering strengths <strong>and</strong> limitations of various kinds of<br />
linguistics data, <strong>and</strong> how multiple sources of data <strong>and</strong> methods of data collection can be combined to enhance underst<strong>and</strong>ing.<br />
Students will develop their critical reading skills <strong>and</strong> gain practice in presenting primary source literature to their peers.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
(i) To give students the background <strong>and</strong> the skills to tackle primary advanced psycholinguistics literature.<br />
(ii) To give students the theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> practical experience necessary to design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyse linguistic<br />
experiments<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
A4<br />
probability theory, inferential statistics <strong>and</strong> hypothesis testing<br />
the research methods of experimental psychology (research design, human subjects ethics, data collection tools <strong>and</strong> data<br />
analysis procedures)<br />
the connections between language <strong>and</strong> other human cognitive capacities (memory, decision making, sensory percetion,<br />
etc)<br />
the core research areas <strong>and</strong> results in the field of experimental linguistics<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
assess research methods <strong>and</strong> results reported in the literature <strong>and</strong> the theories that are argued for on the basis of these<br />
results<br />
conceptualize possible experiments to address theoretical issues<br />
deal with complex issues spanning divergent literatures<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyse linguistic experiments<br />
lead critical group discussions of the primary technical literature
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />
C 3<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
present complex theoretical material to a professional audience<br />
develop project management skills<br />
develop skills in interacting professionally with research participants<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Marantz (2005) Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. The Linguistics Review<br />
Schütze (2004) Thinking about what we are asking speakers to do. in Kepser & Reis (eds) Linguistic Evidence: Empirical,<br />
Theoretical, <strong>and</strong> Computational Perspectives. Mouton de Gruyter<br />
Phillips (2001) Levels of representation in the electrophysiology of speech perception. Cognition<br />
Pylkkänen <strong>and</strong> Marantz (2003) Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Science.<br />
Sprouse. (2007) Continuous Acceptability , Categorical Grammaticality , <strong>and</strong> Experimental Syntax. Syntax.<br />
Pylkkänen <strong>and</strong> McElree (2006) The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. in Traxler &<br />
Gernsbacher (eds.), H<strong>and</strong>book of Psycholinguistics (2nd Ed). NY: Elsevier.<br />
Frank et al. (2008) Number as a cognitive technology: evidence from Pirahã language <strong>and</strong> cognition. Cognition.<br />
Vasishth <strong>and</strong> Broe (2009)The foundations of statistics: A simulation-based approach. Springer
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
A mix of lecture <strong>and</strong> seminar within the same 2 hour teaching block.<br />
Students will be presented with explanations of the more technical<br />
aspects of the material, but will be expected to discuss the more<br />
conceptual parts. Groups of two to three students will work together<br />
to lead the course discussion of one of the assigned readings <strong>and</strong><br />
provide a critical discussion of the argumentation, methods <strong>and</strong><br />
analysis, drawing on their developing underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the theory<br />
<strong>and</strong> practice of experimental linguistics.<br />
For each week, the students should be spending about 4-6 hours<br />
reading <strong>and</strong> taking notes on the primary literature discussed in the<br />
class, <strong>and</strong> an additional 2-4hrs completing the practical assignments<br />
associated with each stage of their research project. During the<br />
week they lead the class discussion, they will work further hours<br />
(another 3-4) in preparing their presentation. A similar additional<br />
work load of (4-5) hours, will be required during the last few weeks<br />
of the semester to complete the write up of their experimental<br />
results.<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
over the course<br />
of the semester<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyze a<br />
linguistic experiment<br />
Coursework<br />
50% No n/a<br />
lead the class discussion (in<br />
collaboration with a classmate)<br />
on an assigned reading <strong>and</strong> write<br />
up a short synopsis (individual<br />
writeup). Assessment is of written<br />
work, not of presentation.<br />
Coursework<br />
1hr discussion +<br />
1000 words<br />
writeup<br />
20% No n/a<br />
write up critical assessment of<br />
experimental results<br />
Coursework 2000 words 30% Yes n/a
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 137<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
design, conduct <strong>and</strong> analyze a linguistic experiment<br />
<strong>and</strong> write up critical assessment of experimental results<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Coursework<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
2000 word writeup<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Ruediger<br />
Goerner<br />
Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />
DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />
Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />
email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 16:19:44 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Linguistic Typology <strong>and</strong> Grammatical Theory<br />
Module Code LIN5..<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
Q100 Linguistics<br />
Q190 Linguistics not elsewhere classified<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Languages, Linguistics & Film<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
SLLF<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 30 6 40
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
LIN403 (Languages of the World) introduces students at level 4 to the notion that linguistic variation, while hugely diverse,<br />
conforms to a number of typological patterns, <strong>and</strong> allows them to undertake a highly structured <strong>and</strong> guided mini research<br />
project on a particular language. This module follows on from LIN403, introducing theoretical rather than purely descriptive<br />
analytical tools, <strong>and</strong> allowing students to develop a research project on a single language or a comparative research project on a<br />
number of languages. The project is still closely guided, but it will be for the student to use their ongoing findings to determine<br />
the course of the research project. This then leads on, optionally, to LIN312 (Unfamiliar languages) where students work directly<br />
with a consultant in the class in a much less structured way, so that they use their own expertise to guide the elicitation<br />
methodology.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
a large enough room, with beamer, whiteboard, screen <strong>and</strong> movable tables (for<br />
group work)<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Linguistic Typology <strong>and</strong> Grammatical Theory<br />
Module Code LIN5..<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 5 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
David Adger/Linnaea Stockall<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
LIN403, LIN400<br />
LIN037<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This is a module about language universals <strong>and</strong> linguistic typology. In it you will extend the descriptive knowledge you gained in<br />
LIN403 (Languages of the World) <strong>and</strong> learn how the descriptive categories connect to theoretical models of language variation.<br />
We will cover a subset of word order, grammatical functions, case marking, relative clauses, causative constructions, lexicalization<br />
parameters, the organization of the noun phrase, prepositional syntax, morphophonological variation. The assessment is mainly<br />
by a research project where you will work with native speakers of languages to investigate some typological property of interest.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This module deepens students' descriptive <strong>and</strong> theoretical knowledge of the languages of the wider world (contributing to the<br />
QM graduate attribute of having a global perspective), increases their capacity to undertake independent project work (research<br />
capacity), <strong>and</strong> the interaction with their consultant will increase their capacity to deal with others <strong>and</strong> to modify their approach<br />
given what they discover (continuous learning responding to change). Of course it also deepens their engagement with<br />
knowledge (especially descriptive <strong>and</strong> theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing of unfamiliar categories) <strong>and</strong> contributes to their general<br />
intellectual development.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A1<br />
A2<br />
A3<br />
A4<br />
language universals: notions of grammatical function, linear order, long distance dependency<br />
linguistic typology: notions of variation in morphophonology, morphosyntax<br />
grammatical theory, especially morphosyntactic theory<br />
typological vs theoretical approaches to typological variation<br />
Intellectual (cognitive) skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
apply descriptive categories to new data<br />
develop generalizations about patterns in comparative data<br />
connect empirical generalizations to theoretical underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
work with a consultant<br />
present findings in a clear <strong>and</strong> coherent fashion, comporting with the st<strong>and</strong>ards of the field
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />
C 3<br />
keep an organized record of research findings in the form of a fieldbook<br />
Transferable / personal skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
D 4<br />
D 5<br />
interview consultants in a professional manner<br />
underst<strong>and</strong> ethical issues in consultant work<br />
organize records of data<br />
organize presentation of data<br />
write reports<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Baker, M <strong>and</strong> McCloskey, J (2007) On the relationship of typology to theoretical syntaxLinguistic Typology 11, 285–296.<br />
Bickel, Balthasar (2007). Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic<br />
Typology 11: 239–251.<br />
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language Universals <strong>and</strong> Linguistic Typology: Syntax <strong>and</strong> Morphology. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell<br />
Publishers.<br />
Foley, William A., Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 1984. Functional Syntax <strong>and</strong> Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />
Press.<br />
Greenberg, J. H. 1974. Language typology: a historical <strong>and</strong> analytic overview. Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 184 The Hague <strong>and</strong><br />
Paris: Mouton.<br />
Greenberg, Joseph H., Ferguson, Charles, Moravcsik, Edith A., eds. 1978. Universals of Human Language, 4 Volumes. Stanford:<br />
Stanford University Press.<br />
Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie (eds.) (2005). The World Atlas<br />
of Language Structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike, Honnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of<br />
Chicago Press.<br />
Hopper, Paul J., Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />
Hyman, Larry M., Schuh, Russell G. 1974. Universals of tone rules: evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry 5:81-115.<br />
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1991. Functional explanation in linguistics <strong>and</strong> the origin of language. Language <strong>and</strong> Communication<br />
11:3-28.<br />
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1992. Iconicity <strong>and</strong> generative grammar. Language 68:756-796.<br />
Nichols, Johanna. 1986. On form <strong>and</strong> content in typology. Language typology 1985, ed. W. P. Lehmann, pp. 141-162. Amsterdam<br />
<strong>and</strong> Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.<br />
Polinsky, Maria & Robert Kluender (2007). Linguistic typology <strong>and</strong> theory construction: Common<br />
challenges ahead. Linguistic Typology 11: 273–283.<br />
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, Heine, Bernd. 1991. Aspects of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lecture/Seminar time will concentrate on the core descriptive<br />
categories, their implications for theoretical modelling,<br />
methodological issues (ethics, fieldwork etiquette, recording <strong>and</strong><br />
organizing data). This should be about 2 hours per week.<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
8-10 hours per week at the start of the course will be spent reading<br />
the set papers, consultant interview time, writing up interview notes,<br />
this will then rise by 3-4 hours towards the end of the course with<br />
the extra time being spent applying theoretical models to interview<br />
data, writing up the project,<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Final element<br />
of assessment?<br />
lit review of research topic Coursework 1500 25 No None<br />
Qualifying<br />
Mark<br />
Research project data report Coursework 2500 75 Yes None<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 138<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Research project data report Coursework 2500<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Ruediger<br />
Goerner<br />
Digitally signed by Ruediger Goerner<br />
DN: cn=Ruediger Goerner, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, ou=School of Languages,<br />
Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film,<br />
email=r.goerner@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 15:59:27 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Module Proposal<br />
School of Electronic Engineering <strong>and</strong> Computer Science<br />
Design for Human Interaction<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
The proposal requires the signature from the Head of School.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Design for Human Interaction<br />
Module Code DCS059<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
G400 Computer Science<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
None.<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
Computer Science Undergraduate SEB<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 10 5 15<br />
2012/13 10 5 15<br />
2013/14 10 5 15
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Developments in information technology have radically altered the nature of human communication leading to the emergence<br />
of new structures <strong>and</strong> forms of communication. The most successful contemporary applications of computing technology (e.g.<br />
Twitter, Facebook <strong>and</strong> Flikr) depend on creating <strong>and</strong> exploiting new kinds of human communication, in turn creating new social<br />
economies ('crowdsourcing', 'prosumers', 'GPL licensing') . Technologies such as embodied robotics <strong>and</strong> virtual avatars have a<br />
particularly direct reliance on exploiting <strong>and</strong> enhancing different forms of embodied human interaction.<br />
Currently, we do not have theories that can predict how new technologies might enrich or enhance human interaction <strong>and</strong><br />
we lack the tools <strong>and</strong> techniques necessary for a principled approach to the design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of these systems. This<br />
research-led course explores these issues by introducing psychological theories of the nature of human communication <strong>and</strong><br />
socio-historical perspectives on the development <strong>and</strong> impact of communication technologies. These models are applied to the<br />
analysis of new communications technologies <strong>and</strong> the effects of those technologies on communication patterns between<br />
individuals, groups <strong>and</strong> societies.<br />
This module introduces a variety of different technologies ranging from systems for the support of tightly-coupled synchronous<br />
interactions through to large-scale mass interactions with groups such as audiences. Detailed studies of the effects of different<br />
technologies on task performance, communication processes <strong>and</strong> user satisfaction are reviewed. Particular attention is paid to<br />
the notion of communicative success <strong>and</strong> to the development of metrics that can be used in assessing it. Frameworks for<br />
analysing the communicative properties of different media will be introduced as well as approaches to the analysis of<br />
communication in groups <strong>and</strong> organisations.<br />
This is an optional module already offered at level 7 on some EECS Masters programmes. We are now proposing a level 6 version<br />
of the module to be offered as an optional module on G400 BSc Computer Science <strong>and</strong> the proposed new programme BSc(Eng)<br />
Multimedia <strong>and</strong> Arts Technology. In addition, the School of Biological <strong>and</strong> Chemical Sciences intend to offer the level 6 module as<br />
an option on their BSc Psychology.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
Lecture Theatre. Video cameras <strong>and</strong> microphones for fieldwork.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
None.<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Design for Human Interaction<br />
Module Code DCS059<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 6 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 1<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Professor Partick G. T. Healey<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None None DCS318 Interaction Design
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
Technology can support new forms of human communication. Embodied robotics, virtual avatars <strong>and</strong> social software<br />
applications (e.g. Twitter, Facebook <strong>and</strong> Flikr) create new forms of human interaction <strong>and</strong> new social economies ('crowdsourcing',<br />
'prosumers', 'GPL licensing').<br />
This research-led course introduces psychological theories of human communication that help us to underst<strong>and</strong> how technology<br />
can enrich <strong>and</strong> transform human interaction. It also introduces the tools <strong>and</strong> techniques necessary for a principled approach to<br />
the design <strong>and</strong> evaluation of such technology.<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
To survey the impact on human communication of developments in information technology.<br />
To demonstrate the central importance of human communication for the design of effective information technologies.<br />
To explore the potential application of theories of human communication for the analysis of information technologies.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
The impact of contemporary technology on human communication.<br />
The theories of grounding, turn-taking <strong>and</strong> repair that underpin successful human interaction.<br />
The use of the body in face-to-face human interaction in a shared space.<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
Analyse the interactional organisation of face-to-face conversations <strong>and</strong> identify the critical points in an interaction.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Evaluate the strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses of a new communication technology.<br />
Propose designs for new or adapted technologies<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Use a critical awareness of the way people communicate that can be adapted to a range of situations<br />
Construct <strong>and</strong> evaluate an argument<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
Identify appropriate technical infrastructures for different forms of collaboration<br />
Identify the basic conversation analytic phenomena in transcribed dialogues<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Clark, H.H. (1996). "Using Language" Cambridge University Press.<br />
Heath, C. <strong>and</strong> Luff, P. (2000) 'Technology in Action'. Cambridge University Press.<br />
Levinson, S.C. (1983) 'Pragmatics' Cambridge University Press (chapter on Conversation Analysis).
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures (2 hours per week) = 24 hours<br />
Fieldwork (1.5 hour per week) = 18 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
9 hours per week = 108 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
150 hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Ethnographic Observation Coursework 4 hours 6%<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Technology Study Coursework 6 hours 10%<br />
Interaction Analysis Coursework 2 hours 4%<br />
Examination Examination 2.5 hours 80% Yes<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 2.5 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Critical Study Coursework 4hours 80% Yes<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 139<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Title of Proposal(s)<br />
being considered<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Module Proposal<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Module Proposals:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Advanced Combinatorics (MTH742P)<br />
Advanced Combinatorics (MTH742U)<br />
Complex Systems (MTH743P)<br />
Complex Systems (MTH743U)<br />
Further Topics in Algebra (MTH745P)<br />
Further Topics in Algebra (MTH745U)<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
consider <strong>and</strong> approve the proposal(s) identified above <strong>and</strong><br />
detailed in the accompanying documentation. If any<br />
conditions of approval or recommendations arise through<br />
discussion at the Board these should be clearly stipulated in<br />
the PMAB minutes <strong>and</strong> articulated to the proposer.<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
Each pair of modules include one UG <strong>and</strong> one Taught PG<br />
scheme (with different pass marks <strong>and</strong> resit schemes)<br />
Advanced Combinatorics<br />
Learning outcomes for Knowledge <strong>and</strong> Underst<strong>and</strong>ing are<br />
somewhat vague (consider replacing the word ‘some’); no<br />
transferable skills listed.<br />
Further Topics in Algebra<br />
Learning outcomes – no transferable skills identified.<br />
No reading list is provided (tbc)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />
Module Code MTH742U<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
G110 Pure Mathematics<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 5 1 50<br />
2012/13 5 1 50<br />
2013/14 10 1 50
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />
The School of Mathematics has at the moment three combinatorics-related modules at level 7: Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic<br />
Combinatorics, Extremal Combinatorics, <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics.<br />
The rationale for Advanced Combinatorics comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 combinatorics<br />
modules to two. The proposed model is to offer a general combinatorics module in Semester A, followed by an advanced<br />
combinatorics module in Semester B.<br />
The selected module for Semester A is Extremal Combinatorics. Advanced Combinatorics would follow in Semester B. Part of the<br />
syllabus of Enumerative Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics will be used in Advanced Combinatorics.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />
tutorials per week for each student.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />
Module Code MTH742U<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
MTH6109 Combinatorics<br />
None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module builds on the combinatorial ideas of the modules Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Extremal Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> introduces some<br />
of the more advanced tools for solving combinatorial <strong>and</strong> graph theoretic problems. The topics covered will depend on the<br />
module organiser's expertise but significant emphasis will be on the techniques used as well as the results proved.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This module aims to introduce students to some of the more advanced techniques used in combinatorics such as the Regularity<br />
Lemma, probabilistic techniques, the discrete Fourier transform, eigenvalue methods <strong>and</strong> generating functions with the<br />
intention that the students will be able to recognise <strong>and</strong> then apply the appropriate tools in unfamiliar situations.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
Some advanced combinatorial techniques<br />
Some of the ideas used in more advanced combinatorics<br />
A 3<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
Decide which techniques are appropriate for specific combinatorial problems<br />
Apply these techniques for solving these problems<br />
B 3<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
P. Cameron, Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic Combinatorics, Lecture notes.<br />
P. Flajolet <strong>and</strong> R. Sedgwick, Analytic Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />
Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />
Total: 44 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />
Total: 106 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
Total: 150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
David<br />
Arrowsmith<br />
Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />
DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />
email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.09 16:32:10 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 140<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />
Module Code MTH742P<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
G110 Pure Mathematics<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 5 1 50<br />
2012/13 5 1 50<br />
2013/14 10 1 50
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />
The School of Mathematics has at the moment three combinatorics-related modules at level 7: Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic<br />
Combinatorics, Extremal Combinatorics, <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics.<br />
The rationale for Advanced Combinatorics comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 combinatorics<br />
modules to two. The proposed model is to offer a general combinatorics module in Semester A, followed by an advanced<br />
combinatorics module in Semester B.<br />
The selected module for Semester A is Extremal Combinatorics. Advanced Combinatorics would follow in Semester B. Part of the<br />
syllabus of Enumerative Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Additive Combinatorics will be used in Advanced Combinatorics.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />
tutorials per week for each student.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Advanced Combinatorics<br />
Module Code MTH742P<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
MTH6109 Combinatorics None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module builds on the combinatorial ideas of the modules Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> Extremal Combinatorics <strong>and</strong> introduces some<br />
of the more advanced tools for solving combinatorial <strong>and</strong> graph theoretic problems. The topics covered will depend on the<br />
module organiser's expertise but significant emphasis will be on the techniques used as well as the results proved.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
This module aims to introduce students to some of the more advanced techniques used in combinatorics such as the Regularity<br />
Lemma, probabilistic techniques, the discrete Fourier transform, eigenvalue methods <strong>and</strong> generating functions with the<br />
intention that the students will be able to recognise <strong>and</strong> then apply the appropriate tools in unfamiliar situations.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
Some advanced combinatorial techniques<br />
Some of the ideas used in more advanced combinatorics<br />
A 3<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
Decide which techniques are appropriate for specific combinatorial problems<br />
Apply these techniques for solving these problems<br />
B 3<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
P. Cameron, Enumerative <strong>and</strong> Asymptotic Combinatorics, Lecture notes.<br />
P. Flajolet <strong>and</strong> R. Sedgwick, Analytic Combinatorics, Cambridge University Press.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />
Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />
Total: 44 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />
Total: 106 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
Total: 150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
David<br />
Arrowsmith<br />
Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />
DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />
email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.09 16:29:48 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 141<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Complex Systems<br />
Module Code MTH743U<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
G120 Applied Mathematics<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 5 1 50<br />
2012/13 5 1 50<br />
2013/14 10 1 50
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Study programme: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />
The current offering of applied mathematics modules at level 7 (MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc) does not currently reflect the research strengths<br />
of the applied mathematics group in the fields of dynamical systems, stochastic processes, <strong>and</strong> their applications for the study of<br />
complex systems. At the same time, it is thought that the growing interest in complex systems, both in terms of popular interest<br />
<strong>and</strong> research, is not adequately represented at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>. The introduction of a module on complex systems is seen as an<br />
effective way to address these issues.<br />
Many mathematics departments in the UK with a strong applied group (Warwick, Bath, Bristol, etc.) already offer a module on<br />
complex systems.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />
tutorials per week for each student.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Complex Systems<br />
Module Code MTH743U<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
Complex systems can be defined as systems involving many coupled units whose collective behaviour is more than the sum of<br />
the behaviour of each unit. Examples of such systems include coupled dynamical systems, fluids, transport or biological<br />
networks, interacting particle systems, etc. The aim of this module is to introduce students with a number of mathematical tools<br />
<strong>and</strong> models used to study complex systems <strong>and</strong> to explain the mathematical meaning of key concepts of complexity science,<br />
such as self-similarity, emergence, <strong>and</strong> self-organisation. The exact topics covered will depend on the module organiser’s<br />
expertise with a view to cover practical applications using analytical <strong>and</strong> numerical tools drawn from other applied modules.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
- Introduce students to the field of complex systems via a number of representative examples <strong>and</strong> models of these systems (e.g.,<br />
coupled dynamical systems, time-delayed systems, stochastic processes, networks, time series, fractals, multifractals, particle<br />
models)<br />
- Introduce students to basic tools <strong>and</strong> quantities used in the study of complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic<br />
dynamics, dimensions, Lyapunov exponents, complexity measures, entropies)<br />
- Introduce students to the concepts of emergence <strong>and</strong> self-organisation in the context of basic models of complex models<br />
- Introduce students to basic computational <strong>and</strong> numerical methods used to study complex systems<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
Basic concepts used in the modelling of complex systems (e.g., coupled dynamical systems, maps, stochastic<br />
processes, particle models, networks, chaotic motion, fractals, multifractals, fluids)<br />
Basic tools used to study complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic coding, Lyapunov exponents,<br />
entropies, complexity measures, centrality measures)<br />
Certain phenomena associated with complex systems: e.g., chaos, ergodicity, self-similarity, scaling, emergence, selforganisation<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Construct <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> simple models of complex systems (e.g., coupled maps, coupled or delayed differential<br />
equations, particle models, networks)<br />
Use different tools to study the properties or behaviour of certain complex systems<br />
Distinguish different properties or behaviours of complex systems (e.g., regular motion, chaotic motion,<br />
synchronisation, turbulence)<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Construct short programs to numerically simulate simple models of complex systems<br />
Read technical papers on complex systems <strong>and</strong> summarise them
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
R. Badii, A. Politi, Complexity: Hierarchical Structures <strong>and</strong> Scaling in Physics, Cambridge, 1997.<br />
J. P. Sethna, Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, <strong>and</strong> Complexity, Oxford University Press, 2011.<br />
M. E. J. Newman, Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2010.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />
Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />
Total: 44 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />
Total: 106 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
Total: 150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Courseworks <strong>and</strong>/or tests Coursework N/A 20 No N/A<br />
Final examination Examination 3 hours 80 Yes<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
David<br />
Arrowsmith<br />
Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />
DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />
email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.09 16:32:41 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 142<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Complex Systems<br />
Module Code MTH743P<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
G120 Applied Mathematics<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 5 1 50<br />
2012/13 5 1 50<br />
2013/14 10 1 50
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Study programme: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />
The current offering of applied mathematics modules at level 7 (MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc) does not currently reflect the research strengths<br />
of the applied mathematics group in the fields of dynamical systems, stochastic processes, <strong>and</strong> their applications for the study of<br />
complex systems. At the same time, it is thought that the growing interest in complex systems, both in terms of popular interest<br />
<strong>and</strong> research, is not adequately represented at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>. The introduction of a module on complex systems is seen as an<br />
effective way to address these issues.<br />
Many mathematics departments in the UK with a strong applied group (Warwick, Bath, Bristol, etc.) already offer a module on<br />
complex systems.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />
tutorials per week for each student.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Complex Systems<br />
Module Code MTH743P<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
None None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
Complex systems can be defined as systems involving many coupled units whose collective behaviour is more than the sum of<br />
the behaviour of each unit. Examples of such systems include coupled dynamical systems, fluids, transport or biological<br />
networks, interacting particle systems, etc. The aim of this module is to introduce students with a number of mathematical tools<br />
<strong>and</strong> models used to study complex systems <strong>and</strong> to explain the mathematical meaning of key concepts of complexity science,<br />
such as self-similarity, emergence, <strong>and</strong> self-organisation. The exact topics covered will depend on the module organiser’s<br />
expertise with a view to cover practical applications using analytical <strong>and</strong> numerical tools drawn from other applied modules.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
- Introduce students to the field of complex systems via a number of representative examples <strong>and</strong> models of these systems (e.g.,<br />
coupled dynamical systems, time-delayed systems, stochastic processes, networks, time series, fractals, multifractals, particle<br />
models)<br />
- Introduce students to basic tools <strong>and</strong> quantities used in the study of complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic<br />
dynamics, dimensions, Lyapunov exponents, complexity measures, entropies)<br />
- Introduce students to the concepts of emergence <strong>and</strong> self-organisation in the context of basic models of complex models<br />
- Introduce students to basic computational <strong>and</strong> numerical methods used to study complex systems<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
Basic concepts used in the modelling of complex systems (e.g., coupled dynamical systems, maps, stochastic<br />
processes, particle models, networks, chaotic motion, fractals, multifractals, fluids)<br />
Basic tools used to study complex systems (e.g., bifurcation diagram, symbolic coding, Lyapunov exponents,<br />
entropies, complexity measures, centrality measures)<br />
Certain phenomena associated with complex systems: e.g., chaos, ergodicity, self-similarity, scaling, emergence, selforganisation<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Construct <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong> simple models of complex systems (e.g., coupled maps, coupled or delayed differential<br />
equations, particle models, networks)<br />
Use different tools to study the properties or behaviour of certain complex systems<br />
Distinguish different properties or behaviours of complex systems (e.g., regular motion, chaotic motion,<br />
synchronisation, turbulence)<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
Construct short programs to numerically simulate simple models of complex systems<br />
Read technical papers on complex systems <strong>and</strong> summarise them
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
R. Badii, A. Politi, Complexity: Hierarchical Structures <strong>and</strong> Scaling in Physics, Cambridge, 1997.<br />
J. P. Sethna, Statistical Mechanics: Entropy, Order Parameters, <strong>and</strong> Complexity, Oxford University Press, 2011.<br />
M. E. J. Newman, Networks: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2010.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />
Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />
Total: 44 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />
Total: 106 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
Total: 150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Courseworks <strong>and</strong>/or tests Coursework N/A 20 No N/A<br />
Final examination Examination 3 hours 80 Yes<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
David<br />
Arrowsmith<br />
Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />
DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />
email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.09 16:30:26 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 143<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />
Module Code MTH745U<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Undergraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
G110 Pure Mathematics<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 5 1 50<br />
2012/13 5 1 50<br />
2013/14 10 1 50
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />
The School of Mathematics has at the moment three algebra modules at level 7: Group Theory, Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules, Fields <strong>and</strong><br />
Galois Theory. Of these, two are given each year.<br />
The rationale for Further Topics in Algebra comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 algebra modules<br />
to two. The proposed model is to offer a general algebra module in Semester A, followed by an advanced algebra module in<br />
Semester B.<br />
The selected module for Semester A is Group Theory. Further Topics in Algebra will follow in Semester B. Part of the syllabus of<br />
Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules <strong>and</strong> Fields <strong>and</strong> Galois Theory will be used in Further Topics depending on the module organiser.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />
tutorials per week for each student.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />
Module Code MTH745U<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
Group Theory None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module provides exposure to advanced techniques in algebra at an MSc or MSci level. Algebra encompasses familiar objects<br />
such as integers, fields, polynomial rings <strong>and</strong> matrices <strong>and</strong> has applications throughout mathematics including to geometry,<br />
number theory <strong>and</strong> topology. The module will complement the algebra module offered in Semester A <strong>and</strong> will cover topics<br />
either in commutative or noncommutative algebra. Included will be basic definitions <strong>and</strong> theorems in either case, normally with<br />
rings or fields as a starting point.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aim of this module is to expose students to advanced techniques in algebra, which complement those presented in the<br />
module Group Theory. The module is also seen as a way to prepare students to study more advanced algebra subjects at PhD<br />
level.<br />
The topics covered will depend on the expertise of the lecturer. These could be drawn from the theory of rings <strong>and</strong> their<br />
modules, Galois theory or elements of algebraic geometry. Commutative algebra or noncommutative algebra could also be<br />
covered.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
Key advanced concepts of algebra (e.g., rings, modules, finite fields, Galois theory)<br />
Key applications of algebra (e.g., insolubility of equations of degree greater than or equal to 5 by radicals, equivalence<br />
with insolubility of the Galois group)<br />
A 3<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
Apply the concepts learned to appropriate problems in advanced algebra<br />
Explain the steps of reasoning used in solving specific problems in advanced algebra<br />
B 3<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />
Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />
Total: 44 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />
Total: 106 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
Total: 150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
David<br />
Arrowsmith<br />
Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />
DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />
email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.09 16:29:14 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 144<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4a/4b are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with<br />
either alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (sections 4a & 4b)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />
Module Code MTH745P<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code<br />
G110 Pure Mathematics<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Mathematical Sciences<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
MSc Mathematics Examination Board<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Registration Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 5 1 50<br />
2012/13 5 1 50<br />
2013/14 10 1 50
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
Programme of study: MSci <strong>and</strong> MSc in Mathematics. Optional module.<br />
The School of Mathematics has at the moment three algebra modules at level 7: Group Theory, Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules, Fields <strong>and</strong><br />
Galois Theory. Of these, two are given each year.<br />
The rationale for Further Topics in Algebra comes from the School's desire to concentrate the number of level-7 algebra modules<br />
to two. The proposed model is to offer a general algebra module in Semester A, followed by an advanced algebra module in<br />
Semester B.<br />
The selected module for Semester A is Group Theory. Further Topics in Algebra will follow in Semester B. Part of the syllabus of<br />
Rings <strong>and</strong> Modules <strong>and</strong> Fields <strong>and</strong> Galois Theory will be used in Further Topics depending on the module organiser.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard lecturing load of 2 hours/week; st<strong>and</strong>ard tutorial support for 2 hours of<br />
tutorials per week for each student.<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Further Topics in Algebra<br />
Module Code MTH745P<br />
Credit Value 15 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semester 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
To be confirmed, can put Hugo Touchette as MSc Mathematics Programme Director<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
Group Theory None None<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This module provides exposure to advanced techniques in algebra at an MSc or MSci level. Algebra encompasses familiar objects<br />
such as integers, fields, polynomial rings <strong>and</strong> matrices <strong>and</strong> has applications throughout mathematics including to geometry,<br />
number theory <strong>and</strong> topology. The module will complement the algebra module offered in Semester A <strong>and</strong> will cover topics<br />
either in commutative or noncommutative algebra. Included will be basic definitions <strong>and</strong> theorems in either case, normally with<br />
rings or fields as a starting point.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aim of this module is to expose students to advanced techniques in algebra, which complement those presented in the<br />
module Group Theory. The module is also seen as a way to prepare students to study more advanced algebra subjects at PhD<br />
level.<br />
The topics covered will depend on the expertise of the lecturer. These could be drawn from the theory of rings <strong>and</strong> their<br />
modules, Galois theory or elements of algebraic geometry. Commutative algebra or noncommutative algebra could also be<br />
covered.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
Key advanced concepts of algebra (e.g., rings, modules, finite fields, Galois theory)<br />
Key applications of algebra (e.g., insolubility of equations of degree greater than or equal to 5 by radicals, equivalence<br />
with insolubility of the Galois group)<br />
A 3<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
Apply the concepts learned to appropriate problems in advanced algebra<br />
Explain the steps of reasoning used in solving specific problems in advanced algebra<br />
B 3<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
Lectures - 2 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Tutorials/classes - 2 hours per week over 10 weeks<br />
Revision lectures - 2 hours (November <strong>and</strong> April)<br />
Total: 44 hours<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
Independent study time - 6 hours per week over 11 weeks<br />
Revision study time - 40 hours over the year<br />
Total: 106 hours<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
Total: 150 hours
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
Final examination Examination 3 hours 100 Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Examination Examination 3 hours<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
David<br />
Arrowsmith<br />
Digitally signed by David Arrowsmith<br />
DN: cn=David Arrowsmith, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Mathematical Sciences,<br />
email=d.k.arrowsmith@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.09 16:36:34 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must only be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A<br />
<strong>and</strong> where the credit value of the "associate" version is the same as for the main version, <strong>and</strong> the main version<br />
is assessed by exam in May which is not available to the associate students. All other aspects of the module<br />
specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2 above. To add alternative assessment arrangements<br />
please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 145<br />
Section 4a - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester A)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester A. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.<br />
Section 4b - Half Module for Associate Students (for a half module to be taught in Semester B)<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format in Semester B. Modules worth less than<br />
30 credits taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half<br />
module please click 'Add Half Module'.
<strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010-146<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board 31/03/11<br />
Nature of proposal(s)<br />
Owning School /<br />
Institute<br />
Outcome requested<br />
Potential issues<br />
identified <strong>and</strong><br />
comments on the<br />
proposal(s) from<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Secretariat</strong><br />
Module Updates<br />
Various<br />
Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board (PMAB) is asked to<br />
note the approved module updates detailed below. The<br />
following module updates detailed have been considered <strong>and</strong><br />
approved since the previous PMAB meeting on Wednesday<br />
23 rd February 2011.<br />
No significant issues identified.<br />
Module Title Module Code Responsible School / Institute<br />
Applied Futures <strong>and</strong> Options ECOM064 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Applied Risk Management ECOM059 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Further Quantitative Techniques for<br />
Finance <strong>and</strong> Economics ECOM060 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Applied Futures <strong>and</strong> Options ECOM064 Economics <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Banking <strong>and</strong> Financial Essay ECOM046 Centre for Commercial Law Studies<br />
Independent Geographical Study GEG6000 Geography<br />
Project in Environmental Science GEG6212 Geography<br />
Researching Global Change<br />
(Dissertation) GEG6301 Geography<br />
Researching Global Change<br />
(Internship) GEG6302 Geography<br />
Common Law II (Law of Tort) LAW5023 Law<br />
International Environmental Law LAW6052 Law<br />
Organisation <strong>and</strong> Identity BUS302 Business Management<br />
State, Market <strong>and</strong> Society: Concepts<br />
<strong>and</strong> Critique BUSM063 Business Management<br />
Semester Abroad – German Erasmus<br />
Work Placement GER293 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Year Abroad – Erasmus Work<br />
Placement GER297 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Culture <strong>and</strong> Society in Medieval Spain:<br />
Christians, Jews <strong>and</strong> Muslims HSP205 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
War, Humour <strong>and</strong> Love in Medieval<br />
Spanish Literature HSP306 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Russian Avant-garde RUS085 Languages, Linguistics <strong>and</strong> Film<br />
Clinical Measurements DEN406 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />
Surgical Techniques <strong>and</strong> Safety DEN412 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />
Clinical Measurements DENM024 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science<br />
Surgical Techniques <strong>and</strong> Safety MELM003 Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 147<br />
Module Withdrawal Form<br />
This form should be used to obtain approval of the withdrawal of a module that has previously been approved.<br />
Please note that modules cannot be registered as withdrawn on the Student Information System until resitting/<br />
retaking students have completed the appropriate assessment.<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information<br />
Module Title Please see attached lists DCD <strong>and</strong> DCH/ELH modules<br />
Module Code<br />
Credit Value 15<br />
Level Mode of Study Distance Learning<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Schools also involved in teaching part of the module<br />
If the module is to be replaced, please give the title <strong>and</strong> (if available) code of the new module.<br />
Proposed date of last intake (insert month/year) Last cohort has already completed<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Jane Reid<br />
1) Rationale for Proposed Withdrawal<br />
The DCD modules were all part of a distance learning programme (G5BT BSc (Hons) Computer Science) which has ceased to run<br />
<strong>and</strong> will be withdrawn in due course.<br />
The DCH - ELH modules were all part of a distance learning programme (G5HK BSc (Hons) Computer Science) which has ceased<br />
to run <strong>and</strong> will be withdrawn in due course.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 147<br />
2) Implications of the Proposed Withdrawal<br />
Specify how students' programme of study might be affected <strong>and</strong> indicate whether the students have been<br />
consulted on the proposed change. If the External Examiners have been consulted please insert comments<br />
here.<br />
No implications<br />
Implications of the Proposed Withdrawal<br />
Please list those programmes of study<br />
for which this module is either<br />
compulsory or recommended.<br />
Have the relevant programme<br />
organisers agreed in principle to the<br />
withdrawal?<br />
Please see attached list<br />
Yes<br />
Is the module taken by students from<br />
other Schools? If so please list the<br />
Schools <strong>and</strong> confirm that they have<br />
been informed of the proposed module<br />
withdrawal.<br />
No<br />
What steps are being taken to avoid<br />
any shortfall in academic provision?<br />
N/A<br />
Approval of Module Withdrawal<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Module Withdrawals ref BSc in Computer Science (G5BT)<br />
DCD100<br />
DCD103<br />
DCD104<br />
DCD111<br />
DCD113<br />
DCD124<br />
DCD129<br />
DCD150<br />
DCD200<br />
DCD201<br />
DCD210<br />
DCD219<br />
DCD224<br />
DCD225<br />
DCD234<br />
DCD235<br />
DCD237<br />
DCD301<br />
DCD302<br />
DCD303<br />
DCD306<br />
DCD310<br />
DCD314<br />
DCD317<br />
DCD318<br />
DCD326<br />
DCD327<br />
DCD333<br />
DCD334<br />
DCD337<br />
DCD338<br />
DCD340<br />
DCD341<br />
Procedural Programming<br />
Language And Communication<br />
Object-Oriented Programming<br />
Computer Architecture<br />
Logic And Discrete Structures<br />
Computers And Society<br />
Probability And Matrices<br />
Fundamentals Of Web Technology<br />
Essential Networks And Operating Systems<br />
Further Networks And Operating Systems<br />
Algorithms And Data Structures In An<br />
Object-Oriented Framework<br />
Specification And Reasoning<br />
Graphical User Interfaces<br />
Database Systems<br />
Software Engineering Theory<br />
Software Engineering<br />
Business Information Systems<br />
Computability<br />
Multimedia<br />
Computational Genomics<br />
High Performance Computing<br />
Systems Analysis<br />
Computer Graphics<br />
Advanced Database Systems And Technology<br />
Interaction Design<br />
Artificial Intelligence<br />
Machine Learning Techniques For Data<br />
Mining<br />
Algorithms And Complexity<br />
Computer Science Project<br />
Software Risk Assessment<br />
Distributed Systems And Security<br />
C++ For Image <strong>and</strong> Audio Processing<br />
Entrepreneurship In Information Technology
School of Electronic Engineering & Computer Science<br />
Module Withdrawals ref BSc in Computer Science (G5HK)<br />
ELH402<br />
ELH606<br />
Enterprise Management<br />
Product Development<br />
DCH100<br />
DCH103<br />
DCH104<br />
DCH111<br />
DCH113<br />
DCH124<br />
DCH129<br />
DCH150<br />
DCH200<br />
DCH201<br />
DCH210<br />
DCH219<br />
DCH224<br />
DCH225<br />
DCH234<br />
DCH235<br />
DCH301<br />
DCH302<br />
DCH303<br />
DCH306<br />
DCH310<br />
DCH314<br />
DCH317<br />
DCH318<br />
DCH326<br />
DCH327<br />
DCH330<br />
DCH333<br />
DCH334<br />
DCH337<br />
DCH338<br />
DCH339<br />
DCH341<br />
Procedural Programming<br />
Language And Communication<br />
Object-Oriented Programming<br />
Computer Architecture<br />
Logic And Discrete Structures<br />
Computers And Society<br />
Probability And Matrices<br />
Fundamentals Of Web Technology<br />
Essential Networks And Operating Systems<br />
Further Networks And Operating Systems<br />
Algorithms And Data Structures In An<br />
Object-Oriented Framework<br />
Specification And Reasoning<br />
Graphical User Interfaces<br />
Database Systems<br />
Software Engineering Theory<br />
Software Engineering<br />
Computability<br />
Multimedia<br />
Computational Genomics<br />
High Performance Computing<br />
Systems Analysis<br />
Computer Graphics<br />
Advanced Database Systems And Technology<br />
Interaction Design<br />
Artificial Intelligence<br />
Machine Learning Techniques For Data<br />
Mining<br />
Management Of Technology<br />
Algorithms And Complexity<br />
Computer Science Project<br />
Software Risk Assessment<br />
Distributed Systems And Security<br />
C++ For Image Processing<br />
Entrepreneurship In Information Technology
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />
Programme Amendment Form<br />
This form should be used to submit a proposal to change a programme of study, i.e. a proposal that modifies<br />
the arrangements originally approved by the College. For example:<br />
• change in the title of the programme - please note that changing the programme title will<br />
necessitate the recoding of the programme<br />
• change in the length of the programme of study<br />
• changes in compulsory or recommended modules<br />
• changes in the programme regulations<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Summary Information (as previously approved)<br />
Programme Title(s) Dental Materials<br />
Programme Code(s) J5S9<br />
Programme Qualification<br />
Master of Science (MSc)<br />
Mode of study<br />
Programme<br />
Duration<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
School of Engineering & Materials Science<br />
Schools who are also be involved in teaching part of the programme<br />
School of Medicine <strong>and</strong> Dentistry (Institute of Dentistry)<br />
Details of any collaborative Higher Education Institution(s) involved in teaching any part of the programme<br />
Not applicable<br />
Programme Organiser Professor R Hill <strong>and</strong> Dr AJ Bushby<br />
1) Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Detail the proposed amendments to the programme <strong>and</strong> attach the updated Programme Specification. If new<br />
modules are to be added to the programme(s) or if existing modules are to be removed this should be clearly<br />
specified in the space below. Further information regarding the module(s) to be added / removed from the<br />
programme(s) can be provided in the table below. Alternatively, this information can be presented in text form<br />
in the space below, as long as all of the key information in the table is detailed.<br />
This proposed programme amendment will involve the development of a joint programme managed between SEMS <strong>and</strong> SMD<br />
(Institute of Dentistry) built upon the use of current modules to offer improved coherence <strong>and</strong> logic. The following modules from<br />
the current MSc in Dental Materials curriculum will be withdrawn:<br />
Materials Chemistry (MTRM010), Applied Dental Materials (MTRM028), Advanced topics in Dental Materials (MTRM049),<br />
Evaluation <strong>and</strong> Modelling in Dental Materials (MAT316), Biosensors <strong>and</strong> devices (MTRM007), Advanced structure/property<br />
relationships in materials (MTRM065).<br />
These will be replaced by the following modules, taken primarily from Institute of Dentistry programmes:
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />
Properties of Dental Materials 1 & 2 (DIN7008/DIN7009), Minimally Invasive Dentistry (DIN7152), Biomineralisation <strong>and</strong><br />
Biomimetics (DIN7154), Medical Ethics & Regulatory Practice (DENM009), Research Methods & Experimental Techniques<br />
(DENM014) <strong>and</strong> Oral Biology 1 (a new module to be created from a current 30 credit module, DIN7150).<br />
The MSc exam board will be based in SEMS, embedded in the existing SEMS SEB structure, with appropriate representation from<br />
the Institute of Dentistry.<br />
Admissions for the joint programme will be administered by SEMS, with recruitment decisions taken jointly by the programme<br />
organisers. The admissions target will be 12 full-time students each year, subject to annual review between SEMS/SMD (Institute<br />
of Dentistry). A costing statement is attached, confirming that fee income from the programme will be distributed equally<br />
between SEMS/SMD (Institute of Dentistry).<br />
Either SEMS or SMD (Institute of Dentistry) may withdraw from this arrangement, subject to giving 12 months notice of that<br />
withdrawal.<br />
The revised programme structure is detailed below:<br />
Module Title<br />
Module<br />
Code<br />
Credits<br />
Level<br />
Module<br />
Selection<br />
Status<br />
<strong>Academic</strong><br />
Year of<br />
Study<br />
Add / Remove<br />
Module from<br />
Programme<br />
X Properties of Dental Materials 1 DIN 7008 15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />
X Properties of Dental Materials 2 DIN 7009 15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />
X Introduction to Oral Biology 1 to be assigne 15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />
X Minimally Invasive Dentistry DIN7152 15 7 Elective 1 Add Module<br />
X Biomineralisation & biomimetics DIN7158 15 7 Elective 1 Add Module<br />
X<br />
Research Methods/Experimental<br />
Techniques<br />
DENM014<br />
15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />
X Surfaces & interfaces in Dentistry MAT211 15 5 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />
X<br />
Medical Ethics/Law/Regulatory<br />
Practice<br />
DENM009<br />
15 7 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />
X Science of Biocompatability MAT312 15 5 Compulsory 1 Add Module<br />
X Research Project MTRM005/DI 60 7 Core 1 Add Module<br />
2) New Programme Title (if applicable)<br />
Please note that changing the programme title will necessitate the recoding of the programme.<br />
Not applicable<br />
3) Proposed Date of Amendment Introduction September 2011
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />
4) Rationale<br />
Detail the rationale for the proposed amendment(s).<br />
This programme amendment is designed to clarify, re-focus <strong>and</strong> enhance the current taught postgraduate portfolio offered<br />
respectively by SEMS/Institute of Dentistry. There are currently parallel <strong>and</strong> competing programmes offered within SEMS <strong>and</strong><br />
SMD (Dental Materials & Dental Technology) - this amendment will create a joint collaborative programme designed to recruit<br />
high quality applicants. It will aim to offer an underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the basic science underlying dental materials, offering<br />
opportunities for those seeking to develop research careers in dental materials at the academic/clinical interface. The<br />
anticipated recruitment market will be primarily dental school academics <strong>and</strong> basic scientists seeking specialist training in dental<br />
materials research. The programme is designed to provide a suitable entry training for PhD programmes in Materials <strong>and</strong> Dental<br />
Materials.<br />
The amendment will also allow QMUL to respond positively to current programme developments in other UK higher education<br />
institutions (Sheffield, Manchester). Students have requested the creation of this opportunity. The essentially clinical <strong>and</strong><br />
technique based MSc in Dental Technology programme will be retained in SMD which recruits from a different market.<br />
5) Resource Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Are there any resource implications linked to the proposed amendment(s)?<br />
Attendance at joint modules attracting students from various programmes will require appropriately sized <strong>and</strong> equipped<br />
teaching accommodation to be made available.<br />
6) Anticipated Practical Implications of Proposed Amendment(s)<br />
Please specify how students' study patterns might be affected. Have the students been consulted about the<br />
proposed amendment(s)?<br />
No negative impact on students' study patterns is anticipated - the creation of the joint programme is expected to create a more<br />
seamless curriculum which will encourage student study. One driver for the programme amendment is student feedback, see<br />
below, requesting the opportunity of exploring the clinical interface in the academic content of the current programme.<br />
It is recognised that the organisation of modules in the Institute of Dentistry will require one examination to be held in week 7/8<br />
of Semester B, for module DIN7008, along with other students studying this module. It is believed that this is valuable, in<br />
particular for overseas students to gauge their academic performance; informal feedback to the students can be provided by<br />
tutors for those who are performing below the required level required for successful completion of their MSc.<br />
7) External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Student Consultation<br />
Have you consulted your External Examiner(s) <strong>and</strong> Students about the proposed amendments? If so,<br />
please detail their comments.<br />
Letter of support attached from the current External Examiner: Serena Best<br />
Student statements attached.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 148<br />
A revised Programme Specification must accompany the Programme Amendment. Programme<br />
Amendments that are not accompanied by the necessary documentation will not be<br />
considered by Programme <strong>and</strong> Module Approval Board.<br />
> If the programme amendment relates to the addition of previously unapproved<br />
modules, have module proposal forms for any new module(s) been submitted?<br />
Yes<br />
> Has a the Programme Specification been revised to take into account the programme<br />
amendment?<br />
Yes<br />
Approval of Programme Amendment<br />
Programme<br />
Organiser*<br />
Julia<br />
Shelton<br />
Digitally signed by Julia Shelton<br />
DN: cn=Julia Shelton, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong><br />
University of London, ou=School of<br />
Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science,<br />
email=j.shelton@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.15 14:57:07 Z<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Farida<br />
Fortune<br />
Digitally signed by Farida Fortune<br />
DN: cn=Farida Fortune, o=QMUL,<br />
ou=Institute of Dentistry,<br />
email=dental.dean@qmul.ac.uk,<br />
c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.10 10:13:20 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
John Stark<br />
Digitally signed by John Stark<br />
DN: cn=John Stark, o=<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>,<br />
ou=School of Engineering <strong>and</strong><br />
Materials Science,<br />
email=j.p.w.stark@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.15 08:57:30 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board
Prof. Serena M. Best BSc, MA (Cantab), PhD, FIi\1MM, CEng<br />
Professor ofMaterials Science<br />
Director ofthe Cambridge Centre f or Medical Materials<br />
Professor Julia Shelton<br />
<strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong>, University of London<br />
UNIVERSITY OF<br />
CAMBRIDGE<br />
Department of Ma terials<br />
Science <strong>and</strong> Metallurgy<br />
1 February 2011<br />
Dear Professor Shelton,<br />
MSc in Dental Materials Programme Amendment<br />
I have been the external examiner for the Dental Materials MSc programme at <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> for 3<br />
years <strong>and</strong> whilst I have been completely satisfied by its academic content <strong>and</strong> the project dissertations,<br />
I am most interested in the programme amendment that is being suggested.<br />
The amendments that are proposed to include the delivery of modules by the Institute of Dentistry<br />
seem entirely appropriate <strong>and</strong> the inclusion of projects that are co-supervised by SEMS <strong>and</strong> Institute<br />
of Dentistry academics will enhance the programme considerably.<br />
1 am fully supportive of these amendments <strong>and</strong> believe that they will enhance the programme<br />
considerably.<br />
Yours sincerely,<br />
Professor Serena Best<br />
New Museums Site<br />
Pembroke Street<br />
Cambridge CB2 3QZ<br />
Telephone: 01223 334307<br />
Fax: 01223334567<br />
E-mail: smb51@cam.ac.uk
Student comment: MSc in Dental Materials<br />
1. Soon after completing my BDS from Pakistan, I came to <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of<br />
London to study MS-c- in Dental Material. The course greatly helped me develop my<br />
knowledge in materials science in general <strong>and</strong> dental materials in specific. I<br />
completed the degree with distinction <strong>and</strong> was offered a PhD scholarship. Having<br />
completed my PhD, am now working as a Post-Doc on a KTP project with pSp<br />
Dental, UK. The project aims at developing a novel range of resin modified glass<br />
ionomer cement.<br />
2. I am an overseas Dentist. I joined <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of London for my M.Sc. in<br />
Dental Materials in 2004 due to its reputation as a leading institute for Material Sciences within<br />
the University of London. Studying Dental Materials in QMUL has given -. the opportunity to<br />
explore dental materials from a number of different perspectives. The course was being run in<br />
collaboration with Institute of Dentistry which also provided me a great learning<br />
environment. I have found the course very enjoyable <strong>and</strong> most of the modules were very<br />
relevant to my course. However, some modules such as Biosensor <strong>and</strong> Devices <strong>and</strong> Materials<br />
Selection <strong>and</strong> Design were not designed according to dentistry. Due to lack of equipment in<br />
QMUL laboratories such as Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy<br />
(ICP-OES), I had to attend another university outside of London for my experiments. The<br />
lecturers <strong>and</strong> other staff were very helpful. They were always ready to listen to students’<br />
problems <strong>and</strong> advise adequately.<br />
3. I did my MSc in Dental Materials from <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> University of London in 2006/07. I am<br />
a dentist <strong>and</strong> opted to do this course so that l could have a better knowledge in<br />
advancements in dental materials. After completing the course I felt that the whole course<br />
was too much generalized in giving information about how research is conducted, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
properties of materials, from a materials point of view. The thing that was most lacking was<br />
the clinical perspective of the materials i.e. how the properties were affected in clinical<br />
situations or in oral environment <strong>and</strong> vice versa. The course also lacked knowledge about<br />
where the current research of the dental materials is heading, what would be the hot field<br />
to research in the future <strong>and</strong> what to expect in future in terms of materials that would be<br />
available in market. The reason for this insufficiency of the course could be attributed to<br />
the lack of collaboration with the institute of dentistry because all the modules especially<br />
the dental materials were taught by engineering <strong>and</strong> materials staff who lacked the clinical<br />
background/knowledge. Restructuring the course so that dentistry link is re-established<br />
would be a huge improvement for the people who take this course in future.<br />
Overall it was a great experience for me <strong>and</strong> I found the course enjoyable <strong>and</strong> challenging.<br />
The whole university environment <strong>and</strong> the facilities provided by department made up for<br />
the points that I believed were lacking in the course.<br />
4. Attending the MSc Dental Materials course (2A06/07) was an intense, interesting <strong>and</strong><br />
scientifically stimulating experience. The taught modules spread over a wide range of<br />
Biomaterials topics <strong>and</strong> focused on many aspects of current hi-end Biomaterials <strong>and</strong> stem-cell<br />
research. The course was generally well organised with many problem-based-learning<br />
exercises <strong>and</strong> team projects throughout the year. The course co-ordinators <strong>and</strong> teachers were<br />
all keen <strong>and</strong> experienced in teaching. There was however a noticeable lack of staff with Dental<br />
background as most of the teaching staff were material scientists <strong>and</strong> chemists. This made the<br />
course's target vague <strong>and</strong> often caused disorientation amongst the students. Although very<br />
interesting <strong>and</strong> very mind -broadening in terms of curriculum, the programme may have
enefited from more dental materials related courses taught by experts in the field. This could<br />
have been accomplished if a collaboration between the Dental School <strong>and</strong> the School of<br />
Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science had been established. As students had both dental <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
technical background, the exercises should have been designed in a way so as to enhance<br />
relevant skills <strong>and</strong> knowledge. ln contrast, many exercises involved working with undergraduate<br />
students from many other disciplines in various material related issues but not dental related. lf<br />
the exercises were more related to dental research, this contact with undergraduates would<br />
have been of true benefit for us. The students expressed their thoughts for improvements<br />
through many SSLC meetings; however no improvements seemed to be possible at the time.<br />
The research project however gave the opportunity to most of the students to redefine their<br />
target as luckily many supervisors from the Dental Physical Sciences unit <strong>and</strong> the Dental School<br />
were chosen.<br />
To conclude, redesigning the course to include more dental related material specific topics<br />
would be of great benefit to future students. Collaboration with the Dental School for the<br />
teaching of the core Dental Materials subjects <strong>and</strong> relevant research could make this possible.<br />
Since the School of Engineering <strong>and</strong> Materials Science is well equipped in terms of materials<br />
research equipment, the link with the Dental school would certainly satisfy the research interests<br />
<strong>and</strong> needs of prospective dental materials students.<br />
*****
COSTING MODEL FOR POSTGRADUATE TAUGHT COURSES<br />
INCOME & EXPENDITURE FORECAST<br />
COURSE TITLE:<br />
MSc Dental Materials<br />
Planned student numbers<br />
Year 1<br />
2011-12<br />
Full-time home / low fee - paying 2.0<br />
Part-time home / low fee - paying 0.0<br />
Full-time overseas / premium fee - paying 10.0<br />
Part-time overseas / premium fee - paying 0.0<br />
Total student numbers 12.0<br />
Total student fte 12.0<br />
Fee rates<br />
Full-time home / low fee £9,500<br />
Part-time home / low fee £4,750<br />
Full-time overseas / premium fee £15,750<br />
Part-time overseas / premium fee £7,875<br />
Forecast tuition fee income<br />
Home / low fee-paying students £19,000<br />
Overseas/ premium fee - paying students £157,500<br />
Less discounts £0
Less cash discount on overseas fees @ 2% (£3,150)<br />
Total forecast tuition fee income £173,350<br />
Other income £0<br />
Total income £173,350<br />
Income Dentistry £86,675<br />
Income SEMS £86,675<br />
Projected costs<br />
Year 1<br />
2011-12<br />
Staff costs<br />
Annual cost per fte<br />
<strong>Academic</strong> staff:<br />
Course director (Clinical) £112,750 £0<br />
Course director (Non-clinical) £82,000 £0<br />
Clinical professors £123,000 £0<br />
Other clinical academics £102,500 £0<br />
Non-clinical professors £92,250 £92,250<br />
Reader / senior lecturers £71,750 £0<br />
Lecturers £51,250 £42,025 Assume .82 FTE here<br />
Support staff £46,125 £0<br />
Other 'bought in' staff costs £0<br />
Total staff costs £0 £134,275<br />
Non-staff costs<br />
Course materials £3,000
Laboratory consumables<br />
£9,600 Allowing £800 per student<br />
Office consumables £0<br />
Equipment £0<br />
External examiners' fees & expenses<br />
£360 External Examiner<br />
Outside speakers £0<br />
Staff advertising £0<br />
Publicity & marketing £0<br />
Hospitality £0<br />
Miscellaneous expenses £0<br />
Provision for bad debts @ 5% £8,668<br />
Other:<br />
Total non-staff costs £21,628<br />
Overhead<br />
Per home student fte £1,166 £2,332<br />
Per overseas student fte £1,388 £13,880<br />
Per academic staff fte £9,387 £17,084.34<br />
Per other staff fte £1,840<br />
Per £1k non-pay expenditure £71 £915.90<br />
Per sq.m. space (exc investment charge)<br />
Per sq.m. space (inc investment charge)<br />
Total Overhead Charge £34,212<br />
Total Costs £190,115
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />
Module Proposal Form<br />
Sections 1 <strong>and</strong> 2 must be completed in full.<br />
Sections 3 <strong>and</strong> 4 are only to be completed where the module will be available to associate students with either<br />
alternative assessment arrangements (section 3)<br />
or as a half module (section 4)<br />
By hovering over the blank boxes with your cursor further guidance will be displayed to aid completion.<br />
Section 1 - Summary Information<br />
Module Title Financial Models <strong>and</strong> Derivatives in a Legal Context<br />
Module Code QLLM125<br />
Credit Value 45 Level 7 Module Type MOD Scheme Taught Postgraduate<br />
Start Date September 2011<br />
Proposed JACS Code 1<br />
Proposed JACS Code 2<br />
M221 Business <strong>and</strong> Commercial Law<br />
M900 Others in Law<br />
Proposed JACS Code 3<br />
Further details on JACS codes can be found at http://tiny.cc/g5a6c<br />
Responsible School / Institute<br />
Centre for Commercial Law Studies<br />
Schools which will also be involved in teaching part of the module<br />
Collaborating institutions involved in teaching part of the module (if applicable), including the estimated<br />
percentage contribution to the module from the collaborative partner<br />
Subject Exam Board<br />
responsible for the module<br />
LLM & PG Diploma, MSC Law <strong>and</strong> Finance<br />
Anticipated Student Registrations<br />
Year of Student Entry Anticipated Student Intake Minimum Student Intake Maximum Student Intake<br />
2011/12 40 5 none<br />
2011/12
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />
Module Rationale<br />
Provide a rationale for the introduction of the module <strong>and</strong> specify for which programme(s) of study the module<br />
is designed <strong>and</strong> whether it will be offered as a core, compulsory or option module<br />
The rationale of this course is to introduce law students to basic concepts <strong>and</strong> models in finance <strong>and</strong> their implementation in<br />
asset valuation. These concepts <strong>and</strong> models, including sophisticated derivative instruments, are being increasingly used by the<br />
courts. The course aims to simplify complex financial concepts in order to facilitate legal implementation. Students seeking to be<br />
involved in complex commercial <strong>and</strong> financial transactions need to develop underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> facility in dealing with these<br />
models <strong>and</strong> this module meets these needs. Students interested in research can accommodate to a different area of future legal<br />
research in commercial law. This course broadens the scope of the legal analysis taught in the commercial law department <strong>and</strong><br />
complements courses taught currently in the commercial law <strong>and</strong> international financial law departments.<br />
The module will be offered as an optional module in the LLM, General PG Diploma <strong>and</strong> MSC in Law <strong>and</strong> Finance programme.<br />
Resource Requirements<br />
By school responsible for module<br />
CCLS, School of Law<br />
By any other <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> school or<br />
collaborative institution<br />
School of Economics<br />
Section 2 - Module Specification<br />
Module Title Financial Models <strong>and</strong> Derivatives in a Legal Context<br />
Module Code QLLM125<br />
Credit Value 45 Level 7 Mode of Delivery On Campus Semester Semesters 1 & 2<br />
Module Organiser<br />
Dr. Dorit Samuel<br />
Pre-requisite modules Co-requisite modules Overlapping modules<br />
none<br />
1) Content Description<br />
Provide a description of the module, as it will appear in the Module Directory <strong>and</strong> on the Student Information<br />
System (approx. 70-80 words).<br />
This course introduces complex concepts in finance at a level that is appropriate for law students to master them . The first part of<br />
the course introduces the student to basic underst<strong>and</strong>ing of financial models <strong>and</strong> concepts as it relates to valuation in a legal<br />
context. This knowledge forms the basis of analysis for the more complex <strong>and</strong> broader concept of derivatives. The focus<br />
eventually turns to the analysis of “derivative” instruments, their application in different economic situations, <strong>and</strong> the benefits/<br />
consequences of helping clients set up contracts employing them when investing or conducting business, both locally <strong>and</strong><br />
globally. Derivative instruments will be analyzed from two separate points of view: speculative <strong>and</strong> hedging. Tools <strong>and</strong> basic<br />
models that help in underst<strong>and</strong>ing the appropriate usage of different derivatives in different situations will also be introduced<br />
<strong>and</strong> examined. Through the course analysis, students will develop a thorough underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the models that influence <strong>and</strong><br />
eventually determine the relationships among different derivative instruments. Legal cases are used to analyze actual situations<br />
<strong>and</strong> explore different possible solutions using financial models <strong>and</strong> derivatives, facilitating an acceptable legal determination as<br />
to the best selection for every particular exposure. The course will be taught on the assumption that the students have no prior<br />
knowledge of these financial instruments.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />
2) Module Aims<br />
Specify the aims of the module, i.e. the broad educational purposes for offering this module.<br />
The aim of the module is to empower the student to evaluate the legal contractual binding systems supporting the financial<br />
models in general, with a focus on derivatives. From the course, the students should develop proficiency in the manipulation of<br />
financial data <strong>and</strong> financial information systems usage; they should become competent to engage in basic financial analysis<br />
followed by application of those financial models to support legal analysis <strong>and</strong> decision. The course will work extensively with<br />
Excel spreadsheet, although proficiency in excel is not required <strong>and</strong> instructions will be afforded in its use, students should be<br />
prepared to learn to use it. The course culminates in a thorough analysis, underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>and</strong> application of derivatives. Legal<br />
cases will be used to evaluate, criticize <strong>and</strong> support underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the difficulties of the courts in dealing with valuation<br />
conflicts arising from the application of these financial models.<br />
3) Learning Outcomes<br />
Identify the learning outcomes for this module, i.e. knowledge, skills <strong>and</strong> attributes to be developed through<br />
completion of this module. Outcomes should be referenced to the relevant QAA benchmark statements <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Engl<strong>and</strong>, Wales <strong>and</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> (2008). The SEEC<br />
Credit Level Descriptors for Further <strong>and</strong> Higher Education 2003 <strong>and</strong> <strong>Queen</strong> <strong>Mary</strong> Statement of Graduate<br />
Attributes should also be used as a guiding framework for curriculum design.<br />
Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of:<br />
A 1<br />
A 2<br />
A 3<br />
Excel spreadsheet in the analysis <strong>and</strong> manipulation of financial data <strong>and</strong> the ability to retrieve financial information<br />
from data bases as needed .<br />
Financial models <strong>and</strong> concepts used by the courts <strong>and</strong> the conflicts that arise from applying them.<br />
Derivatives <strong>and</strong> the models that support their application, <strong>and</strong> future legal implication of using them speculatively.<br />
Intellectual skills - able to:<br />
B 1<br />
B 2<br />
B 3<br />
Produce a critical evaluation of the models used by the courts <strong>and</strong> assess their respective strength <strong>and</strong> potential<br />
shortcomings in their application.<br />
Apply new concepts that would clarify the limitations of the models when used in new applications.<br />
Improve their technical ability to analyze complex financial data.<br />
Transferable skills - able to:<br />
C 1<br />
C 2<br />
C 3<br />
Make financial decisions <strong>and</strong> adapt legal positions to reflect changed conditions.<br />
Evaluate complex expert financial opinions in courts.<br />
Underst<strong>and</strong>, adapt, <strong>and</strong> use current research in financial analysis.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />
Practical skills - able to:<br />
D 1<br />
D 2<br />
D 3<br />
Deal with complex financial issues, <strong>and</strong> make sound judgements when adapting to changes or incomplete<br />
information<br />
Adapt quickly to permutations in the financial concepts<br />
Pursue new venues of financial valuation within the context of available legal constrictions<br />
4) Reading List<br />
Provide an indicative reading list for the module. This should include key texts <strong>and</strong>/or journals but should not<br />
be an exhaustive list of materials.<br />
Weekly lecture notes provided by Dr. Samuel.<br />
"Harvard Business Review" articles <strong>and</strong> cases.<br />
Current legal cases.
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />
Teaching <strong>and</strong> Learning Profile<br />
Provide details of the method of delivery (lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work, etc) used to enable the<br />
achievement of learning outcomes <strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity to give an overall picture<br />
of the workload a student taking the module would be expected to undertake.<br />
1. Student / lecturer interaction<br />
Specify details of the method of delivery e.g.<br />
lectures, seminars, fieldwork, lab work etc used to<br />
enable the achievement of the learning outcomes<br />
<strong>and</strong> an indicative number of hours for each activity.<br />
weekly: seminars/lectures (2 hours) = 44<br />
2. Student independent learning time<br />
Specify an indicative number of independent hours<br />
of study a student undertaking this module would<br />
be expected to undertake.<br />
weekly: computer lab assignments (5.5 hours), reading <strong>and</strong> research<br />
(7 hours), homework (6 hours) =406<br />
1. + 2. Total module notional study hours<br />
Specify the total module notional study hours. This<br />
should be a total of the hours given in 1. <strong>and</strong> 2.<br />
The notional study hours for each academic credit<br />
point is 10. A 15 credit point module therefore<br />
represents 150 notional study hours.<br />
45 hours = 450 notional study hours<br />
Assessment Profile<br />
Provide details of the assessment methods used to assess the achievement of learning outcomes.<br />
Brief Description of<br />
Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration /<br />
Length of<br />
Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
Percentage<br />
Weighting<br />
Qualifying<br />
Final element Mark for<br />
of assessment? Individual<br />
Assessment<br />
course essay Coursework 7500 words 50% Yes N/A<br />
course essay Coursework 7500 words 50% Yes N/A<br />
Reassessment<br />
Provide details of the reassessment methods used, specifying whether reassessment is either st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />
reassessment or synoptic reassessment.<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard Reassessment<br />
Synoptic Reassessment<br />
Synoptic reassessment details (if you have indicated synoptic reassessment above, please give details)
Programme & Module Approval Board <strong>Paper</strong> Code: PMAB2010 - 149<br />
Brief Description of Assessment<br />
Assessment Type<br />
Duration / Length of Examination /<br />
Coursework<br />
2 x course essays Coursework 2 x 7500 word essays<br />
Approval of New Module Proposal<br />
The signature of the Heads of School/Institute will be taken as confirmation that the School or Institute<br />
can fund the required resources, both internal <strong>and</strong> elsewhere (for example: staffing, library <strong>and</strong><br />
computing resources).<br />
Head(s) of School<br />
Spyros<br />
Manitias<br />
Digitally signed by Spyros Manitias<br />
DN: cn=Spyros Manitias, o=<strong>Queen</strong><br />
<strong>Mary</strong>, UoL, ou=Centre for Commercial<br />
Law Studies,<br />
email=s.m.manitias@qmul.ac.uk, c=GB<br />
Date: 2011.03.16 15:29:59 Z<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Head(s) of<br />
supporting School<br />
Chair of Programme <strong>and</strong> Module<br />
Approval Board<br />
Section 3 - Alternative Assessment Arrangements for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the module will be made available to associate students in Semester A,<br />
includes an examination in the May/June examination period <strong>and</strong> alternative assessment arrangements are<br />
therefore required. All other aspects of the module specification remain the same as indicated in Section 2<br />
above. To add alternative assessment arrangements please click 'Add Alternative Assessment'.<br />
Section 4 - Half Module for Associate Students<br />
This section must be completed if the proposed module will take place over 2 semesters but will be made<br />
available to single-semester associate students in a half-credit format. Modules worth less than 30 credits<br />
taken over 2 semesters may not be made available in a half-credit format. To add details for the half module<br />
please click 'Add Half Module'.