Safe Schools/Healthy Students Logic Model (PDF) - Milwaukee ...

Site: Milwaukee Public Schools Page: 1 

3/24/08 

Safe Schools/Healthy Students Final Logic Model Worksheet 

SS/HS Final Logic Model – Putting It All Together 

Needs and 

Gaps 

Goals 

SS/HS 

Element(s) Objectives Activities Partners 

Process 

Measures 

Indicators 

and GPRA 

Need 1a: 8.7% of 

students surveyed 

on the 2005 MPS 

High School 

YRBS reported 

missing school 

due to feeling 

unsafe during the 

past thirty days 

Need 1b: 

According to the 

2005 MPS High 

School YRBS 

17.7% of students 

were involved in 

a physical fight 

one or more times 

on school 

property during 

the past twelve 

months 

Need 1c: 


2006-07 District 

Incidents and 

Actions report as 

of 6-14-2007 

34% of all 

Personal/Physical 

safety incidents 

were a result of 

fighting 

Goal 1: 

Reduce 

levels of 

disruption 

and 

violence in 

the 

schools 

Element One: 

Safe School 

Environments 

and Violence 

Prevention 

Activities 

Objective 1.1 

Short Term: 

Decrease by 2.5 

% each year the 

number of high 

school students 

who do not go 

to school 

because they 

feel unsafe at 

school or on 

their way to and 

from school by 

spring 2011 

Objective 1.2 

Long Term: 

Decrease the 

percentage of 

high school 

students who 

have been in a 

physical fight 

on school 

property by 8% 

by spring 2011 

Objective 1.3 

Short Term: 

Decrease the 

number of high 

school, middle 

school and 

elementary 

school 

personal/physi 

1. Classroom Organization 

and Management Program 

(COMP) training for 

teachers along with 

program oversight to 

ensure fidelity of 

implementation 

(Objective 1) 

2. Staying Alive: 

Interactive small-group 

multidisciplinary assetbuilding 

program for 6 th 

graders designed to 

decrease intentional and 

unintentional injury, 

promote anger management 

skills and violence 

prevention, and improve 

mental health in MPS 

students (Objective 2 & 3) 

3. Gang awareness training 

for students, parents, staff 

(Objective 2 & 3) 

4. Milwaukee Violence 

Free Zone (Objectives 1, 2 

& 3) 

5. School Resource Officer 

(Objectives 1, 2 & 3) 

1. MPS Violence 

Prevention will provide 

training, technical 

assistance and monitor 

progress. The project 

coordinator will provide 

oversight 

2. Milwaukee Fire Dept.; 

Medical College of WI; 

Project Ujima and MPS 

Wellness and Prevention 

Office will work together 

to develop, plan and seek 

funding. The MFD will 

provide the program to 

targeted 6 th grade students 

3. MPS Division of Safety 

and Security 

Milwaukee Police 

Department 

MPS Wellness,Prevention 

Office and Juvenile Justice 

4. A project director from 

the Center for 

Neighborhood Enterprise 

will manage and work 

cooperatively with MPS 

Academic Excellence and 

James Madison Academic 

Campus H.S. Principal 

1. The number of 

staff trained in 

COMP at the 

selected SS/HS 

schools. 

(Staff climate 

survey, 

pre/post test) 

2. The 

percentage of 6th 

grade students 

receiving the 

Staying Alive 

program that 

report not being 

in a physical 

fight. 

(MPS suspension 

data, pre/post 

test, student 

climate survey) 

3. The 

Percentage of 

those trained in 

gang awareness 

that report being 

more knowledgeable 

of current 

gang activity. 

(Climate survey) 

4. All JMAC 

Staff and 

students will 

GPRA 1.1 In 

the targeted 

schools by 

Spring 2011 

decrease by 

10% (2.5 % 

each year) 

the number of 

students who 

did not go to 

school on 1 or 

more days 

during the past 

30 days 

because they 

felt unsafe at 

school or on 

their way to 

and from 

school as 

measured by 

the YRBS. 

GPRA 1.2 In 

the targeted 

schools by 

Spring 2011 

decrease by 8% 

(2% each year) 

the number of 

students who 

have been in a 

physical fight 

on school 

property in the 

12 months


3/24/08 


cal safety 

incidents that 

were a result of 

fighting by 

16% by spring 

2011 

5. Milwaukee Police 

Department will provide the 

officer who will work with 

the Northwest Secondary 

H.S. Principal, students and 

the surrounding community 

work with CNE 

personnel to 

reduce violence 

in the school. 

(MPS 

suspension 

data) 

5. Students and 

Staff will 

improve 

perception of 

police and 

reduce 

suspension rate. 

(Perception 

Survey, MPS 

suspension 

data, Climate 

Survey) 

prior to the 

survey as 

measured by 

the YRBS. 

Indicator 1.3 

By spring 

2011, the 

targeted 

schools will 

decrease by 

16% the 

number of 

fighting 

incidences as 

recorded on the 

District's 

Incident and 

Actions Report. 

There will be a 

4% decrease 

per 

year


3/24/08 



Needs and 

Gaps 

Goals 

SS/HS 


Process 

Measures 

Indicators 

and GPRA 

Need 2a: 


2005 YRBS 24% 

of MPS high 


used marijuana 

one or more times 

during the past 30 

days and 20% of 

middle school 

students have 


Need 2b: 


2005 YRBS 

35.5% of MPS 

high school 

students reported 

having at least 

one drink on one 

or more of the 

past 30 days and 

50% of middle 


have had a drink 

of alcohol other 

than a few sips 

Need 2c: 


2005 MPS YRBS 

13.1% of high 


and 8% of middle 

Goal 2: 

Prevent or 

reduce 

substance 

abuse 

among 

youth 

Element 

Two: 

Alcohol, 

Tobacco, and 

Other Drug 

Prevention 

Activities 

Objective 2.1 

Short Term: 

Decrease the 

percentage of 

high school and 

middle school 

students who 

report current 

marijuana use 

by 2.5% each 

year 

Objective 2.2 

Short Term: 

Decrease the 

percentage of 

high school 

and middle 


who report 

current alcohol 

use by 3.5% 

each year 

Objective 2.3 

Short Term: 

Decrease the 

percentage of 

high school 

and middle 


who report 

current tobacco 

use by 2.5 % 

each year 

1. Informed Parent nights 

and quarterly all day 

informational workshops 

for parents/guardians and 

MPS staff to identify and 

address relevant issues 

facing youth, adults and 

families such as gang 

involvement, drug and 

alcohol use/abuse, 

domestic violence, internet 

safety, obesity and 

violence. Resource/Health 

Fair. Information and 

access to information and 

community resources 

(Objectives 1, 2, 3 & 4) 

2. School wide research 

based ATODA prevention 

curricula – Life Skills 

Training (Objectives 1, 2, 

3 & 4) 

3. Marijuana, alcohol and 

other drugs abatement peer 

coaching program that will 

train students to be peer 

coaches that implement 

ATODA training 

(Objectives 1 & 4) 

4. Train social workers, 

psychologists and 

guidance counselors to 

1. The MPS SS/HS 

initiative director with help 

from the MPS procurement 

office will follow the 

district contracting 

procedures and use the RFP 

process to identify 

community partners to 

collaboratively plan and 

present with MPS for 

Informed Parent nights and 

workshops. Some of the 

community partners that 

have an established 

relationship helping MPS 

with ATODA issues are 

IMPACT, the Drug 

Enforcement Agency 

(DEA), S.E.T. Ministries 

and the Milwaukee Police 

Department 

2. MPS Wellness and 

Prevention Office 

3. IMPACT 

MPS Wellness and 


4. IMPACT 

Milwaukee County 

Behavioral 

Health/Wraparound and 

MPS Wellness and 


1. The 

percentage of 

SS/HS staff and 

parents that 

attend Informed 

Parent/and 

guardian 

workshops and 

the percentage of 

students that self 

report on a 

decrease in 

ATODA 

(YRBS) 


identified 

schools that 

receive school 

wide Life Skills 

training. 

(Pre/post test, 

YRBS) 


peer, student 

educators that 

are trained. 


SS/HS identified 

staff that receive 

training in 

recognizing 

student substance 

abuse. 

GPRA 2.1: In 

the targeted 

high schools by 

2011 decrease 

the percentage 

of students who 


one or more 

times during 

the past 30 

days by 10% 

(by 2.5% each 

year as 

measured by 

YRBS) 

GPRA 2.2: In 

the targeted 

high schools by 

2011 decrease 

the percentage 

of students who 

reported having 

at least one 

drink on one or 

more of the 

past 30 days by 

14% (3.5 % 

each year) as 

measured by 

YRBS 

Indicator 2.3: 

In the targeted 

high schools 

and middle


3/24/08 



reported smoking 

cigarettes on one 

or more of the 

past 30 days 

Need 2d: 


2006-07 District 

Incidents and 

Actions report as 

of 6-4-2007 there 

were 911 student 

incidents 

involving drugs 

(597 drug 

incidences), 

alcohol (128 

alcohol 

incidences) and 

tobacco (186 

tobacco product 

or smoking 

materials 

incidences) 

Objective 2.4 

Long Term: 

Decrease the 

number of 

student 

incidents and 

actions related 

to drugs, 

alcohol and 

tobacco by the 

targeted 

schools by 

10% by 2011 

. 

identify suspected drug, 

alcohol and tobacco use by 

students and make proper 

referrals (Objectives 1, 2, 

3 & 4) 

5. School Resource Officer 

(Objectives 1, 2, 3 & 4) 

5. Milwaukee Police 

Department will provide 

the officer who will work 

with the Northwest High 

School principal 

5. The number 

of students and 

staff that 

improve 

perception of 

police and 

reduce 

suspension rate. 

(Perception 

Survey, MPS 

suspension 

data, Climate 

Survey) 

schools by 

2011, decrease 

the number of 

students 

reporting 

smoking 

cigarettes on 

one or more of 

the past 30 

days by 10% 

(2.5% each 

year) as 

measured by 

YRBS 

Indicator 2.4: 


high schools 

and middle 

schools by 

2011, decrease 

the drug, 

alcohol and 

tobacco 

incidents 

reported on the 

Incident and 

Actions report 

by 10% each. 

(2.5% each 

year) as 

measured by 

YRBS


3/24/08 



Needs and 

Gaps 

Goals 

SS/HS 


Process 

Measures 

Indicators 

and GPRA 

Need 3a: 


6/4/2007 district 

incidents and 

actions report 

there were 39,275 

suspensions for 

classroom 

disruptions during 

2006-2007 

Need 3b: The 

attendance rate at 

the elementary 

level is 93% 

compared to 95% 

at the state. The 

attendance rate at 

the middle school 

level is 94% 


at the state and 

the high school 

rate is 80% 


at the state 

Need 3c: 


2006-2007 school 

climate survey 

61.2% of high 


and 69.9% of the 

elementary and 

Goal 3: 

Increase 

attendance, 

reduce 

suspension 

and 

improve 

school 

climate 

Element 

Three: 

Student 

Behavioral, 

Social, and 

Emotional 

Supports 

Objective 3.1 

Short Term: 

Decrease the 

number of 

suspensions for 

classroom 

disruptions at 

all grade levels 

by 7.5% each 

year 

Objective 3.2 

Short Term 

Increase the 

attendance rate 

at all grade 

levels by 1.5% 

each year 

Objective 3.3 

Long Term 

Increase the 

percentage of 

students who 

report looking 

forward to 

coming to 

school at all 

grade levels by 

16% by 2011 

1. Classroom Organization 

and Management Program 

(COMP) training for 

teachers along with 

program oversight to 

ensure fidelity of 

Implementation 


2. After-school programs 

that provide safe places, 

filled with caring adults 

and constructive activities 

that promote healthy social 

and academic development 


3. Staff in schools will be 

trained in “Restorative 

Justice” to help decrease 

truancy, resolve conflicts, 

provide alternatives to 

suspension/expulsion and 

strengthen classrooms and 

communities. (Objectives 

1, 2, & 3) 

4. In-school peer 

mentoring (Objectives 1, 2 

& 3) 

5. Implement uniform 

documentation across 

schools for the recording 

of student incidents in 

1. MPS Violence 

Prevention will provide 

training and MPS Violence 

Prevention along with the 

project coordinator will 

provide oversight to 

implementation 

2. MPS Division of 

Recreation – Community 

Learning Centers 

3. MPS staff will 

implement these services in 

addition to a Milwaukee 

County Assistant District 

Attorney. MPS Student 

Services and the 

Milwaukee County District 

Attorney will 

collaboratively develop, 

plan and assist with the 

implementation of 

Restorative Justice 

4. IMPACT, 

Wellness and Prevention 

Office 

5. MPS Division of 

Research and Assessment 

6. Milwaukee County 

District Attorney; Children’s 

Court Judge, Milwaukee 

1. The 

percentage of 

staff in the 

identified 

COMP schools 

that are trained 

and self report 

an improvement 

in student 

behavior. 

(Curriculum 

Pre/post surveys, 

climate survey) 

2. The 

percentage of 

students 

attending the 

Community 

Learning Center 

that show 

improvement in 

academic 

achievement 

(Pre/Post data) 

3. The 

percentage of 

staff and 

students that are 

trained and 

receive 

Restorative 

Justice in the 

schools.(Climate 

Indicator 3.1 


schools by 2011 

decrease by 30% 

(7.5% each year) 

the number of 

suspensions 

recorded on the 

district incidents 

and actions 

report for 

classroom 

disruptions. 

Indicator 3.2 

Increase the 


at the targeted 

schools to meet 

or exceed the 

state by 2011. 

By 2011 the 

targeted schools 

will increase the 


by 6% (1.5% 

each year) 

as measured by 

the district 

attendance 

report 

Indicator 3.3 


schools by 2011 

increase by


3/24/08 


middle school 

students strongly 

agree to the 

statement, “I 

usually look 

forward to 

coming to 

school” 

order to provide consistent 

formative/summative data 

for the school district in 

assessing student needs 

(Objectives 1, 2 & 3) 

6. Alternative programs to 

support students 

successfully reentering 

traditional school setting 

from juvenile justice 

including the Transition 

High School (Objectives 2 

& 3) 

7. Alternatives to 

expulsions, ATODA, 

violence prevention 

education and community 

service (Objectives 1, 2 & 

3) 

County Juvenile Court 

Probation Officer; 


Behavioral Health Division; 

Wraparound Milwaukee; 

MPS Student Services; 

Communities; MPS High 

School Redesign will 

collaboratively develop, plan 

and implement alternative 

programs 


District Attorney; 

Children’s Court Judge; 


Behavioral Health Division; 

Wraparound Milwaukee; 

MPS Student Services; 

Communities; MPS 

Innovative Schools will 

collaboratively develop, 

plan and implement 

alternative programs 

Survey) 

4. The 

percentage of 

students in peer 

mentoring that 

feel positive 

about coming to 

school (Pre/Post 

surveys) 

5. The 

percentage of 

schools that 

provide 

consistent and 

accurate data 

(Pre/Post survey, 

WKCE data) 

6. The 

percentage of 

students at 

Transition High 

School that 

graduate. 

(MPS graduation 

data) 

7. The 

percentage of 

students 

identified for 

expulsion that 

are given an 

alternative 

option (MPS 

suspension/expu 

lsion data,) 

16% (4% each 

year) the 

percentage of 

students that 

agree to the 

statement, “I 

usually look 

forward to 

coming to 

school.” 

as measured by 

the district 

climate survey.


3/24/08 



Needs and 

SS/HS 

Process 

Gaps 

Need 4a: In a 

typical year, 300 

MPS students 

receive crisis 

intervention, in 

grades 6 – 12 

linked to essential 

mental health 

services 

Need 4b: In the 

2005-2006 school 

year 20,270 

students in K-12 

were referred for 

non-special 

education needs 

and 1,170 

students were 

referred for child 

abuse and there 

were 4,173 

homeless referrals 

Goals 

Goal 4: 

Increase 

access to 

mental 

health 

services 

for 

students as 

needed 


Element 

Four: 

Mental 

Health 

Services 

Objective 4.1 

Short Term: 

Increase the 

number of 

students 

receiving 

school-based 

mental health 

services at all 

grade levels 

by 2.5% each 

year. 

Objective 4.2 

Long Term: 

Increase the 

percentage of 

mental health 

referrals for 

students at all 

grade levels 

by 15% by 

2011. 

1. Provide training and 

consultation to school 

personnel in early 

identification of mental 

health needs, strategies for 

working with students with 

various mental health needs 

and the array of available 

services for support to 

families and students. 

MUTT would also provide 

ongoing training on crisis 

intervention techniques and 

strategies and general 

mental health principles to 

MPS school personnel 


2. Revise policies and 

procedures as needed to 

ensure enhanced 

communication and 

information-sharing across 

service systems and 

increased services for 

students where they attend 

school (Objective 1) 

3. Depression screening 

and referrals (Objectives 1 

& 2) 

4. Providing early 

identification and 

assessment in the school 

setting for early childhood 

(Objective 2) 


Behavioral Health Division 

Wraparound Milwaukee 

Mobile Urgent Treatment 

Team (MUTT) 

MPS Psychology Department 

MPS Social Work 

Department 

MPS Guidance Department 

MPS Nursing Department 

2. Wraparound Milwaukee 

Milwaukee County District 

Attorney 

Milwaukee Children’s Court 

MPS Student Services. 

SS/HS will fund a .75 social 

worker position to assist in 

carrying out these services 

3. Wraparound Milwaukee 

social worker 

4. SS/HS will fund a .5 early 

childhood position to assist 

with these services 

5. Classroom teacher, school 

psychologist, social worker, 

guidance, MPS 

Collaborative Support team 

6. MPS social workers, 

guidance counselors and 

psychologists. Student IEP’s 

(Individualized Education 

Measures 

1. The 

percentage of 

students in need 

of special 

services that are 

identified and 

referred to the 

proper service 

provider. 

(MPS Student 

Services date) 

2. The 

percentage of 

service providers 

and identified 

staff will be 

trained in 

information 

sharing 

procedures 

3. The 

percentage of 

students in the 

30 SS/HS 

schools that are 

referred will 

receive 

depression 

screening as 

needed. (MPS 

staff and Student 

Services data) 

4. The 

percentage of 

Indicators 

and GPRA 

GPRA 4.1: In 

the targeted 

schools, by 

2011 increase 

by 10% (2.5% 

each year) the 

number of 

students 

receiving 

school based 

mental health 

services as 

measured by 

the District 

referral report. 

GPRA 4.2: In 

the targeted 

schools, by 

2011 increase 

by 15%, (3.75 

each year), the 

number of 

mental health 

referrals for 

students as 

measured by 

the District 

referral report


3/24/08 


5. Teachers, school support 

staff and the Early 

Childhood person will 

provide school-based 

mental health early 

intervention services 

including Problem Solving 

Works, for at-risk children 

which include targeted 

behavioral interventions, 

selected academic 

interventions, social 

competency skill 

development and progress 

monitoring (Objective 1) 

6. Identify students with 

special learning needs and 

students with extenuating 

circumstances such as 

ATODA use/dependency 

and homelessness and 

provide the proper 

counseling/referrals and 

services 

Plan), Behavioral 

Health/Wraparound and 

community ATODA 

agencies such as IMPACT 

and shelters. The .75 SS/HS 

funded social worker will 

assist with these services 

early childhood 

students who are 


services that are 

referred to a 

service provider 

(Problem 

Solving Works 

assessment 

screening) 

5. The 

percentage of 


students who are 


special services 

that are referred 

to a service 

provider and/or 

provided support 

by school 

personnel 

(Problem 

Solving Works 

assessment 

screening, CST 

data) 

6. The 

percentage of 

students in need 

of special 

services that 

receive support. 

(MPS Student 

Services Dept.)


3/24/08 



Needs and 

Gaps 

Goals 

SS/HS 


Process 

Measures 

Indicators 

and GPRA 

Need 5a: 

Currently only 3 of 

the 24 targeted 

MPS schools 

implement the 

ACU Screen 

screening tool to 

identify children 

with 

developmental 

delays 

Need 5b: 78% of 

MPS students 

receive free or 

reduced price 

lunch – an 

indication of 

poverty which 

poses serious 

challenges to the 

efforts of parents 

and others to 

ensure proper 


development 

Need 5c: 


2006-2007 MPS 

District Report 

Card 3.5% of 

students in 5 year 

old kindergarten 

are retained 

Goal 5: 

Increase 

school 

readiness 

of children 

in their 

first 5 

years of 

life 

Element 

Five: Early 

Childhood 

Social and 

Emotional 

Learning 

Programs 

Objective 5.1 

Short Term: 

Increase the 

number of K-5 

classrooms 

using the 

results of the 

ACU Screen 

screening tool 

to identify 

children with 

developmental 

delays to 50% 

by 2009. 

Objective 5.2 

Short Term: 

Increase the 

number of 

parents trained 

in helping 

their child 

develop 

socially and 

emotionally 

by 5% each 

year 

Objective 5.3: 

Long Term: 

Increase the 

number of 

students 

promoted to 

first grade at 

1. Implement the 

Problem Solving Works 

K3-8 program to measure 

developmental milestones 

and school readiness and 

to teach core social, 

literacy and emotional 

skills that have been 

shown to reduce 

aggressive behaviors and, 

in turn, improve 

children’s success in 

school (Objectives 1, 2 & 

3) 

2. Implement programs 

that develop relationships 

among parents, schools 

and the community to 

enhance children’s 

academic and social 

performance (Objectives 2 

& 3) 

3. Provide parent training 

through the “Parenting 

With Love and Logic” 

training sessions 

(Objective 2) 

4. Use the Acu Screen 

Assessment as a tool to 

determine the level of 

children’s learning and 

development. Develop 

individualized learning 

1. Early Childhood 

facilitator to train teachers 

and provide technical 

assistance for Problem 

Solving Works for K3, K4 

and K5 classrooms 

2. Partners such as MPS 

CLC’s (Community 

Learning Centers), Boys 

and Girls Clubs, and 

IMPACT 

3. MPS guidance staff, 

social workers and Title 1 

Parent Coordinators and 

parents 

4. Early Childhood 

Facilitator 

MPS Division of Early 

Childhood 

1. The 

percentage of 

Early 

Childhood 

teachers in the 


that are trained 

in Problem 

Solving Works 

and the 

percentage of 

the early 

childhood 

students in the 


that receive 

Problem 

Solving Works 

screening. 

(Data retrieved 

from the 

Problem 

Solving Works 

assessment 

screening) 

2. The 

percentage of 

parents in the 

30 targeted 

schools that 

have access to 

parent programs 

(Climate 

surveys) 

Indicator 5.1 

A minimum of 

75% of the 

participating 

K-5 classrooms 

will use the 

results of the 

ACU Screen 

screening tool 

to improve 

teaching and 

learning 

(MPS school 

data) by 2011 

Indicator 5.2 


K-8 and 

elementary 

schools, after 

collecting 

student 

baseline date, 

increase by 

40% the 

number of 

parents who 

report 

participation in 

workshops and 

In-services for 

training in 

developmental 

milestones and 

developmental


3/24/08 


the proper age 

By .5% each 

year. 

plans for students based 

on the results of the 

developmental screening 


3. The 

percentage of 

parents in the 

identified 

schools that 

select the Love 

and Logic 

program and 

have access to 

“Parenting With 

Love and Logic 

training. 

(Pre/Post Love 

& logic 

Surveys) 

4. The 

percentage of 

requested early 

childhood 

students that are 

screened. (Acu 

Screen 

assessment 

data) 

delay indicators 

by 2011 

Indicator 5.3 


K-8 and 

elementary 

schools by 

2011 increase 

by 2% the 

number of K5 

students 

advancing to 1 st 

grade at the 

proper age, 

with the needed 

classroom 

skills and at 

grade level 

numeric and 

literacy skills 

by .5% each 

year as 

measured 

through the 

student 

information 

system

Safe Schools/Healthy Students Logic Model (PDF) - Milwaukee ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?