Customized PLE implementations for test-bed scenario ... - ROLE
Customized PLE implementations for test-bed scenario ... - ROLE
Customized PLE implementations for test-bed scenario ... - ROLE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
epository” – the community database containing all services and service bundles –,<br />
and a “widget preference server” – a plat<strong>for</strong>m component which allows to store service<br />
preferences of users and enables sharing of services and bundles.<br />
In further consequence, the deliverable elaborates the most relevant use cases around<br />
this architecture, related work from literature and case studies, as well as<br />
implementation details. Moreover and in accordance with WP3, D4.2 highlights the<br />
importance of widget and service interoperability <strong>for</strong> usability enhancements like singlesign-on<br />
or <strong>for</strong> end-user aspects like combining two widgets with each other, i.e. to<br />
automatically synchronise data between two widgets.<br />
Learner interaction capturing and <strong>PLE</strong> recommendations<br />
Beside other deliverables in the work packages 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7, WP4 also deals with<br />
the idea of capturing learner interactions and generate recommendations <strong>for</strong> <strong>PLE</strong> users<br />
from this data. There<strong>for</strong>e, D4.1 reports on the Camera widget which monitors learners<br />
and captures user interactions with the <strong>PLE</strong> (e.g. the Christmas prototype) in the<br />
Contextualized Attention Metadata (CAM) <strong>for</strong>mat. Deliverable D3.3 explains the<br />
architecture behind the Camera widget in detail. On a pragmatic level, D2.2 and ID6.2<br />
propose deriving pedagogical recommendations while ongoing work in WP7 elaborates<br />
how <strong>PLE</strong> recommendations can be mined from these user-given interaction recordings.<br />
User profiles, authentication, authorisation, single-sign-on<br />
Other issues addressed in various work packages are user (learner) profiles and<br />
aspects of authentication and authorisation. Amongst others, D2.2 and D6.1 give first<br />
details of what a learner profile should contain in order to satisfy the requirements of the<br />
PPIM. D3.3 gives an overview of standards and specification in connection with user<br />
and learner profiles while D3.1 even surveys plat<strong>for</strong>ms containing user management<br />
(e.g. LMSes) or authorisation and authentication services (e.g. OpenID and Shibboleth).<br />
D4.2 highlights the importance of a central authentication mechanism and a single-signon<br />
solution in order to not annoy end-users by being in need of and managing various<br />
user accounts.<br />
User interface and usability issues<br />
Concrete user interface and usability issues are primarily addressed in the work<br />
packages which are close to the end-users, namely in WP4 and WP5. D4.1 describes<br />
the Christmas prototype (see Figure 2-4) and thus proposes a concrete user interface<br />
<strong>for</strong> end-users. Moreover, D4.2 elaborates the most relevant use cases in connection<br />
with the widget-based <strong>PLE</strong> infrastructure and review existing technology (Appstore,<br />
iGoogle, Netvibes, etc.). The deliverable D5.1/D5.2 (‘Participatory design and<br />
implementation plan of Personal Learning Test-<strong>bed</strong>s’) present <strong>PLE</strong> like solutions<br />
available or planned within the five <strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>test</strong>-<strong>bed</strong>s. All in all, the user interface and<br />
usability issues of a <strong>ROLE</strong> <strong>PLE</strong> have being discussed within an own task<strong>for</strong>ce in the<br />
project. Results are partially published at <strong>for</strong>mer conferences (e.g. by Isaksson &<br />
Palmer, 2010), or will be documented in upcoming deliverables.<br />
Page 18 of 102