28.10.2014 Views

14. Letter from Kirk Gable - Demolition of the Prince George Hotel

14. Letter from Kirk Gable - Demolition of the Prince George Hotel

14. Letter from Kirk Gable - Demolition of the Prince George Hotel

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1941, when a new café was opened in <strong>the</strong> building. The proprietor, John Stott, renovated <strong>the</strong><br />

dining hall and began advertising <strong>the</strong> hotel as <strong>the</strong> city's premier location for private dining.<br />

In addition to it's historical value, <strong>the</strong>re are a number <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r good reasons why this building<br />

should not be demolished:<br />

Carbon Footprint and Sustainability - Heritage conservation ensures that our<br />

irreplaceable historic buildings will be enjoyed by future generations, and planning<br />

for future generations is what sustainability is all about. There is ample evidence<br />

that conservation <strong>of</strong> old buildings is a much "greener" course <strong>of</strong> action than<br />

demolition and reconstruction. The National Trust for Heritage Preservation<br />

estimates that demolition and reconstruction <strong>of</strong> buildings consumes more than three<br />

times <strong>the</strong> energy required to retr<strong>of</strong>it an existing building and that it takes about 65<br />

years for an energy efficient new building to save <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> energy lost in<br />

demolishing an existing building. They also estimate that building a new 15,240 sq.<br />

meter commercial building requires <strong>the</strong> same amount <strong>of</strong> energy required to drive a<br />

car 32,186 km per year for 730 years. In addition, conservation saves tons <strong>of</strong> debris<br />

<strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> landfill making it <strong>the</strong> ultimate form <strong>of</strong> recycling.<br />

• Economics - according to <strong>the</strong> UBC Office <strong>of</strong> Sustainability, <strong>the</strong>ir UBC Renew Program<br />

has saved <strong>the</strong> taxpayers <strong>of</strong> BC approximately $88 million since 2004 by retr<strong>of</strong>itting ten<br />

campus buildings ra<strong>the</strong>r than demolishing and rebuilding <strong>the</strong>m. The buildings, dating<br />

<strong>from</strong> 1923 - 1961 were completely refurbished to minimum Silver LEED standard (<strong>the</strong><br />

latest one, <strong>the</strong> Friedman Building achieved a Gold LEED designation) with an average<br />

cost saving <strong>of</strong> 43% on each project. In addition to being much less expensive,<br />

rehabilitation projects tend to be more labor intensive and create more local jobs than<br />

new construction projects.<br />

• Wood First - I can think <strong>of</strong> no better example for <strong>Prince</strong> <strong>George</strong> to demonstrate respect<br />

for, and celebrate <strong>the</strong> long term sustainable value <strong>of</strong> wood structures, than to restore a<br />

structurally sound, 100 year old commercial wood building. In fact <strong>the</strong> <strong>Prince</strong> <strong>George</strong><br />

<strong>Hotel</strong> was and is "Wood First". By demolishing it we cast doubt on our assertion that<br />

commercial wood construction is a long term sustainable solution.<br />

•<br />

• Downtown - <strong>the</strong> shape and character <strong>of</strong> Downtown <strong>Prince</strong> <strong>George</strong> has been a passion <strong>of</strong><br />

mine for many years, and I'm concerned that one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shortcomings <strong>of</strong> Downtown<br />

<strong>Prince</strong> <strong>George</strong> is <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> heritage buildings. It's not that <strong>the</strong>re were none, it's just that<br />

we seem to have little or no respect for old buildings, or perhaps <strong>the</strong> "common wisdom"<br />

has been to cover old wooden buildings with aluminum siding or tear <strong>the</strong>m down so we<br />

can replace <strong>the</strong>m with something shiny and modern. In <strong>the</strong> process we lose something<br />

invaluable to a city core - a glimpse <strong>of</strong> history that tells <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> our beginnings. I<br />

think our city's history is fascinating and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Prince</strong> <strong>George</strong> <strong>Hotel</strong> has been a significant<br />

part <strong>of</strong> that history for almost 100 years. Whenever I travel, <strong>the</strong> first place I like to go is<br />

to <strong>the</strong> "old city" which is always in <strong>the</strong> central core.<br />

• Historic buildings and streets create a charming connection to <strong>the</strong> past that cannot be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!