- Page 1: Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus)
- Page 4 and 5: NGP 2.4.4 Synthesis ……………
- Page 6 and 7: Table AC1. Tier 2 (project-specific
- Page 9 and 10: 1.1 Reviewers Review Team (primary
- Page 11: 1.3.4 Review history The piping plo
- Page 15 and 16: A recently completed study (Miller
- Page 17 and 18: fidelity of Atlantic birds, potenti
- Page 19 and 20: Currently available genetic informa
- Page 21 and 22: in concentration across their winte
- Page 23 and 24: 3. Evidence that the discrete popul
- Page 25 and 26: Figure 1. Distribution and range 1
- Page 27 and 28: Elliott-Smith, E., and S.M. Haig. 2
- Page 29 and 30: USFWS. 1988b. Great Lakes and North
- Page 31 and 32: WM 2.2 UPDATED INFORMATION AND CURR
- Page 33 and 34: North Carolina, in 2005-2006, and p
- Page 35 and 36: Table WM1. Results of the 1991, 199
- Page 37 and 38: WM 2.2.1.4 Habitat use and conditio
- Page 39 and 40: WM 2.2.2.1 Factor A. Present or thr
- Page 41 and 42: Figure WM2. Number of sand placemen
- Page 43 and 44: Tidal inlet relocation can cause lo
- Page 45 and 46: documented from two locations in no
- Page 47 and 48: to result in the taking and the mea
- Page 49 and 50: WM 2.2.2.3 Factor C. Disease or pre
- Page 51 and 52: Table WM5. Summary of predator cont
- Page 53 and 54: WM 2.2.2.5 Factor E. Other natural
- Page 55 and 56: LeDee (2008) collected survey respo
- Page 57 and 58: Michigan breeding sites indicated t
- Page 59 and 60: gas extraction compound tectonic su
- Page 61 and 62: toll on piping plovers, and the 200
- Page 63 and 64:
habitats adapt to accelerating sea-
- Page 65 and 66:
Cobb, R. 2009. The 2006 Internation
- Page 67 and 68:
Hopkinson, C.S., A.E. Lugo, M. Albe
- Page 69 and 70:
Noel, B.L. and C.R. Chandler. 2005.
- Page 71 and 72:
USFWS. 2001. Biological opinion on
- Page 73 and 74:
Winstead, N. 2009. The 2006 Interna
- Page 75 and 76:
Teich, L. 2009. Electronic mail dat
- Page 77 and 78:
List the recovery criteria as they
- Page 79 and 80:
Genetic diversity estimates for bot
- Page 81 and 82:
# of pairs 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 A
- Page 83 and 84:
Survival The 2003 recovery plan rep
- Page 85 and 86:
# of pairs 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 A
- Page 87 and 88:
Other Great Lakes states and provin
- Page 89 and 90:
current nesting sites, limiting rec
- Page 91 and 92:
(Neogobius melanostomus), which die
- Page 93 and 94:
GL 2.3.3.5 Factor E. Other natural
- Page 95 and 96:
F by 2100, while precipitation coul
- Page 97 and 98:
GL 2.3.5 Section references Austin,
- Page 99 and 100:
NGP 2.4 UPDATED INFORMATION AND CUR
- Page 101 and 102:
Recovery Criterion B. Essential bre
- Page 103 and 104:
Recovery Criterion D. The 1,300 pai
- Page 105 and 106:
Piping Plover Pairs 400 350 300 250
- Page 107 and 108:
Piping Plover Pairs 30 25 20 15 10
- Page 109 and 110:
piping plovers eat is still largely
- Page 111 and 112:
shoreline habitat. The population i
- Page 113 and 114:
that a region-wide fledge ratio of
- Page 115 and 116:
U.S. alkali lakes (North Dakota, Mo
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure NGP12: Distribution of North
- Page 119 and 120:
In order to address this shortcomin
- Page 121 and 122:
Number of Adult Plovers 2000 1800 1
- Page 123 and 124:
NGP 2.4.3 Five-factor analysis In t
- Page 125 and 126:
The Nebraska Tern and Plover Conser
- Page 127 and 128:
issued in North Dakota, an increase
- Page 129 and 130:
Since cyclical wet and dry cycles w
- Page 131 and 132:
Most areas in both the U.S. and Can
- Page 133 and 134:
the USACE to develop strategies to
- Page 135 and 136:
of the century, temperatures are pr
- Page 137 and 138:
As the Missouri River basin emerges
- Page 139 and 140:
Catlin, D.H. and J.D. Fraser. 2007.
- Page 141 and 142:
Larson, M.A., M.R. Ryan, and R.K. M
- Page 143 and 144:
Ryan, M.R., B.G. Root, and P.M. May
- Page 145 and 146:
United States Global Change Researc
- Page 147 and 148:
AC 2.5 UPDATED INFORMATION AND CURR
- Page 149 and 150:
depth consideration of all vital ra
- Page 151 and 152:
AC 2.5.2.1 Life history: Sung et al
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure AC1. Trends in abundance (br
- Page 155 and 156:
AC 2.5.2.3 Genetics, genetic variat
- Page 157 and 158:
used. When the amount of time that
- Page 159 and 160:
overwashes (NPS 2008b). During a 19
- Page 161 and 162:
Figure AC2. Ongoing and proposed sh
- Page 163 and 164:
Along the Atlantic coastline in New
- Page 165 and 166:
of predation threats (USFWS 2001, 2
- Page 167 and 168:
anding has been conducted in easter
- Page 169 and 170:
losses of eggs, chicks, and breedin
- Page 171 and 172:
and recommended management options
- Page 173 and 174:
extremely limited. Since 1990, 33 o
- Page 175 and 176:
climate change-related concerns for
- Page 177 and 178:
pumilus)) would also be adversely a
- Page 179 and 180:
the piping plover’s 1986 listing
- Page 181 and 182:
Erwin, R.M., B.R. Truitt, and J.E.
- Page 183 and 184:
McConnaughey, J.L., J.D. Fraser, S.
- Page 185 and 186:
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 200
- Page 187 and 188:
Amirault-Langlais, D. L and F. Shaf
- Page 189 and 190:
Scherer, A. 2007. Field office note
- Page 191 and 192:
3.0 RESULTS ESA section 4(c)(2) req
- Page 193 and 194:
Conflict rating - Ubiquitous confli
- Page 195 and 196:
4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTI
- Page 197 and 198:
3. Improve consistency in the appro
- Page 199 and 200:
a. Identify human coastal stabiliza
- Page 201 and 202:
meaningfully impacting the populati
- Page 203 and 204:
13. Oil and gas exploration and pro
- Page 205 and 206:
for the U.S. portion of their range
- Page 208 and 209:
200
- Page 210 and 211:
John Milio, USFWS Jacksonville Fiel
- Page 212 and 213:
Estimated productivity of Atlantic
- Page 214:
Project name or sponsor and locatio