Expert Demonstrative Evidence - Bogoroch & Associates

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Integrity of <strong>Evidence</strong> Admissibility of computer-generated reconstruction animation Owens (Litigation Guardian of) v. Grandell [1994] O.J. No. 496, 46 A.C.W.S. (3d) 796 (Gen. Div.) page 26
Admissibility Computer-generated reconstruction animation • Testimony from A.R. expert: data points measured at accident were accurate • Testimony from data entry person: data entered correctly • Algorithms used in form and motion software: » Validly apply law of physics » Validly render accurate images of scenes depicted page 27
Page 1 and 2: Expert Demonstrative ce Richard M.
Page 3 and 4: Demonstrative Evidence is essential
Page 5 and 6: Admissibility of Demonstrative Evid
Page 13 and 14: Demonstrative Evidence • Probativ
Page 15 and 16: Demonstrative Evidence Risks “con
Page 17 and 18: page 17
Page 19 and 20: Cost Benefit Analysis Expert Opinio
Page 21 and 22: Cost Benefit Analysis Expert Opinio
Page 23 and 24: Integrity of Evidence The introduct
Page 25: Integrity of Evidence page 25
Page 29 and 30: Admissibility Lancaster (Litigation
Page 31 and 32: Guidelines Uses and Abuses of Demon
Page 33 and 34: Appendix Forms of Demonstrative Evi
Page 35 and 36: Photographs Draper v. Jacklyn (1970
Page 37 and 38: Video Tapes R. v. Nikolovski (1994)
Page 39 and 40: Computer Generated Animations Owens
Page 41 and 42: Computer Generated Animations 6. th
Page 43 and 44: Anatomical Illustrations or Models

Expert Demonstrative Evidence - Bogoroch & Associates

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?