Expert Demonstrative Evidence - Bogoroch & Associates

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Computer Generated Animations 3. the computer animation does not contain editorial comments other than the usual headings; 4. the computer animation accurately represents the plaintiff’s condition; 5. the computer animation is necessary considering that it would be difficult for a witness to describe the effects of the injury and the jury’s understanding of the issues would be greatly assisted by the animation; page 40
Computer Generated Animations 6. the prejudicial value does not outweigh the probative value considering that the animation is presented in a way very simple straightforward manner, without sound or editorializing and with few headings; and 7. the presentation was not misleading or unfair to the defendant. page 41
Page 1 and 2: Expert Demonstrative ce Richard M.
Page 3 and 4: Demonstrative Evidence is essential
Page 5 and 6: Admissibility of Demonstrative Evid
Page 13 and 14: Demonstrative Evidence • Probativ
Page 15 and 16: Demonstrative Evidence Risks “con
Page 17 and 18: page 17
Page 19 and 20: Cost Benefit Analysis Expert Opinio
Page 21 and 22: Cost Benefit Analysis Expert Opinio
Page 23 and 24: Integrity of Evidence The introduct
Page 25 and 26: Integrity of Evidence page 25
Page 27 and 28: Admissibility Computer-generated re
Page 29 and 30: Admissibility Lancaster (Litigation
Page 31 and 32: Guidelines Uses and Abuses of Demon
Page 33 and 34: Appendix Forms of Demonstrative Evi
Page 35 and 36: Photographs Draper v. Jacklyn (1970
Page 37 and 38: Video Tapes R. v. Nikolovski (1994)
Page 39: Computer Generated Animations Owens
Page 43 and 44: Anatomical Illustrations or Models

Expert Demonstrative Evidence - Bogoroch & Associates

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?