31.10.2014 Views

Chapter 3. Duality in convex optimization

Chapter 3. Duality in convex optimization

Chapter 3. Duality in convex optimization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Th.2 [strong duality] Suppose (CO) satisfies the Slater<br />

condition ( so v(CO) < ∞). Then<br />

sup<br />

y≥0<br />

{<br />

ψ(y) = <strong>in</strong>f f (x) | gj (x) ≤ 0 , j ∈ J }<br />

x∈C<br />

If moreover v(CO) is bounded from below (i.e., it is<br />

bounded), then the dual optimal value is atta<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

Proof. (For the case −∞ < v(CO) < ∞) Let a = v(CO) be the<br />

optimal value of (CO). From the Farkas Lemma 2.25 it follows<br />

that there exists a vector y = (y 1 ; . . . ; y m ) ≥ 0 such that<br />

m∑<br />

L(x, y) = f (x) + y j g j (x) ≥ a , ∀x ∈ C, or<br />

j=1<br />

<strong>in</strong>f L(x, y) ≥ a.<br />

x∈C<br />

By the def<strong>in</strong>ition of ψ(y) this implies ψ(y) ≥ a. Us<strong>in</strong>g the weak<br />

duality theorem, it follows a ≤ ψ(y) ≤ v(D) ≤ v(CO) = a and<br />

thus a = ψ(y) = v(CO). So, y is a maximizer of (D). ⋄<br />

CO, <strong>Chapter</strong> 3 p 4/18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!