01.11.2014 Views

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

September 2006<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc.<br />

Manassas, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Ec<strong>on</strong>omies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William County<br />

and <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> in 2005<br />

By: Stephen S. Fuller, Ph.D.<br />

Dwight Schar Faculty Chair and University Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essor<br />

Director, Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis<br />

George Mas<strong>on</strong> University


Executive Summary<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc. is a major source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> employment, payroll, and business investment that benefits <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omies<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William County, and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>. In 2005, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employed 1,013<br />

workers within <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth with 524 (or 52 percent) <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se employees residing within Prince William County and<br />

120 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se workers living within <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se jobs supported a total payroll outlay <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $68.8 milli<strong>on</strong> with<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Manassas resident workforce accounting for $8.5 milli<strong>on</strong> or 12 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this total. Combined with <strong>the</strong> 404 Prince<br />

William County residents working at <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong>se workers represent more than <strong>on</strong>e-half <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> employees<br />

and 54 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its payroll outlays. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> average annual wage for all employees <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth in<br />

2005 was $67,900 with <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employees living in Manassas and Prince William County having a slightly higher average<br />

income <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $70,900.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> operating and capital outlays <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> generate important ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits resulted from both <strong>on</strong>e-time capital outlays incurred during <strong>the</strong> 2002–2005<br />

period that were required to modernize <strong>the</strong> plant and equipment at its Manassas facility and from <strong>the</strong> operating outlays in<br />

2005 that will recur annually.<br />

Capital outlays in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> during <strong>the</strong> 2002–2005 period totaled $178.2 milli<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se capital outlays had a total<br />

accumulated impact <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $279 milli<strong>on</strong> over this four-year period; <strong>the</strong>y generated $56.5<br />

milli<strong>on</strong> in new, pers<strong>on</strong>al income to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> local residents; and <strong>the</strong>y supported 1,560 full-time equivalent year-round<br />

jobs, or almost 390 new jobs annually over <strong>the</strong> four-year period. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se benefits at <strong>the</strong> state-level, inclusive <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those benefits<br />

accruing to <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omy, included $376.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in added value to <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy, $99.3<br />

milli<strong>on</strong> in new, pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings for state residents, and supported a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 3,760 new, year-round, full-time equivalent<br />

jobs, or 940 new jobs annually.<br />

Table 1: Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Local Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s from <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>:<br />

2005 Payroll and Operating Outlays and Capital Investment (in milli<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dollars)<br />

Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> Direct Total Pers<strong>on</strong>al Jobs<br />

and Type Outlays Output (1) Earnings (2) Supported (3)<br />

City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas<br />

Payroll $8.5 $10.7 $1.3 6<br />

Operati<strong>on</strong>s $49.2 $63.2 $11.7 400<br />

Prince William<br />

Payroll* $37.1 $56.6 $11.8 494<br />

Operati<strong>on</strong>s $78.2 $121.3 $22.4 767<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>**<br />

Operati<strong>on</strong>s $134.7 $217.6 $59.4 2232<br />

Capital Outlays $178.2 $279.0 $56.5 1560<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>**<br />

Payroll $68.8 $137.6 $41.1 1802<br />

Operati<strong>on</strong>s $135.7 $285.6 $76.9 2824<br />

Capital Outlays $179.0 $376.2 $99.3 3760<br />

Sources: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc., GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis Notes: (1) <strong>the</strong> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services generated directly and indirectly as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> initial <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> outlay within<br />

<strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>; (2) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al earnings generated within <strong>the</strong> respective jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> new ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities supported by <strong>the</strong> initial <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> outlays; (3) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al new jobs supported<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>wide by <strong>the</strong> spending and re-spending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> direct <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> outlays. *County payroll total includes resident workers in Manassas. **Totals for Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> include City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Manassas and Prince William County totals. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts from payroll and procurement outlays recur annually; ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts from capital outlays reflect spending over <strong>the</strong> 2002-2005<br />

period.


In Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>the</strong> 2005 annual operating outlays by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>, exclusive <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> regular payroll, totaled $134.7 milli<strong>on</strong>,<br />

involving c<strong>on</strong>tracts with 331 local vendors. Vendors located in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas captured $49.2 milli<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se annual<br />

outlays. In <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, <strong>the</strong>se outlays included $4 milli<strong>on</strong> for c<strong>on</strong>tract and service labor, $5.9 milli<strong>on</strong> for purchases<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supplies, $2.8 milli<strong>on</strong> for pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al services, and $5.1 milli<strong>on</strong> for taxes. This spending added an estimated $63.2<br />

milli<strong>on</strong> in total outlays to <strong>the</strong> City’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy in 2005, generated $11.7 milli<strong>on</strong> in new pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

City residents, and supported 400 new jobs. At <strong>the</strong> state level, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s operating outlays (excluding direct payroll) totaled<br />

$135.7 milli<strong>on</strong> and added $285.6 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> state’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy in 2005, generated $76.9 milli<strong>on</strong> in new, pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings<br />

to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> state residents, and supported 2,824 jobs. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s operating outlays, and its annual<br />

payroll disbursements will recur annually.<br />

This analysis dem<strong>on</strong>strates <strong>the</strong> magnitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic impact that flows from <strong>the</strong> operating and capital outlays <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas and Prince William County as well as <strong>the</strong> expanded impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this spending as it<br />

circulates through <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>. While <strong>the</strong> effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct employment and annual<br />

spending outlays are important, it is <strong>the</strong>ir multiplier effects that provide a full measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this importance in stimulating additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

job and income growth, and its full c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to each respective ec<strong>on</strong>omy as measured by <strong>the</strong> aggregate additi<strong>on</strong><br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir gross local and state products; that is, <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services produced within each<br />

respective ec<strong>on</strong>omy resulting from <strong>the</strong> direct payroll, operati<strong>on</strong>s, and capital outlays <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital investment required to modernize <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s plant and equipment during 2002-2005 added a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $376.2 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

to <strong>the</strong> State’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy and $279 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Annual operati<strong>on</strong>s added $121.3 milli<strong>on</strong> and $63.2 milli<strong>on</strong>, respectively, to <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Prince William County and <strong>the</strong><br />

City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas in 2005. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se annual operating outlays, exclusive <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> payroll, also make a significant c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong><br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> ($217.6 milli<strong>on</strong>) and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth ($285.6 milli<strong>on</strong>). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se favorable impacts recur<br />

annually to each respective jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, <strong>the</strong> combined spending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> payroll, capital (annualized), and operati<strong>on</strong>s by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s resident workers<br />

and local vendors accounted for a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $57.7 milli<strong>on</strong> in direct income and generated a total c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> City’s<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omy, estimated at $73.9 milli<strong>on</strong>. This annual spending in 2005 represented 3.5 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> total City’s estimated $2.1<br />

billi<strong>on</strong> total Gross City Product. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s local job base <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1,013 workers accounted directly for 4.1 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>the</strong> City’s 24,685 jobs. For <strong>on</strong>e company to account for so large a c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> local ec<strong>on</strong>omy is noteworthy.<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> City’s, County’s and State’s ec<strong>on</strong>omies, pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings, and job base, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> generates<br />

a significantly positive fiscal benefit to <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas as well as to <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth. Based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> fiscal impact<br />

analysis, it is estimated that <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s presence in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas resulted in a net fiscal benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $4.8 milli<strong>on</strong> in<br />

FY 2005 or $4,787 per <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employee. This fiscal benefit reflects <strong>the</strong> estimated c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> revenues from all sources<br />

totaling $5.657 milli<strong>on</strong> (real estate and property taxes totaling $5.01 milli<strong>on</strong> were <strong>the</strong> largest single source), and <strong>the</strong> local<br />

public expenditure demand by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> and its employees <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City estimated at $808,141. In <strong>the</strong> absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this net fiscal<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> City’s treasury in 2005, <strong>the</strong> City would have had a budget deficit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $3.665 milli<strong>on</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> surplus<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.184 milli<strong>on</strong> it enjoyed. At <strong>the</strong> state level, corporate income tax, payroll withholding, and unemployment taxes totaled<br />

$5.96 milli<strong>on</strong> in FY 2005. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se fiscal benefits at <strong>the</strong> local and state levels finance public expenditures for government<br />

services to residents that <strong>the</strong> residential tax base cannot support, <strong>the</strong>reby enhancing <strong>the</strong> quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> life for all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>ns.


<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Ec<strong>on</strong>omies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William County,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> in 2005<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> total ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William County, and elsewhere across<br />

<strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> will reflect <strong>the</strong> combinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct outlays (capital or operating) and <strong>the</strong>ir subsequent<br />

m<strong>on</strong>etary effects as <strong>the</strong>se funds are circulated through <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy; that is, <strong>the</strong> respending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se direct outlays will generate<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>al ec<strong>on</strong>omic activity that o<strong>the</strong>rwise would not have occurred. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se combined direct and<br />

indirect values can be estimated by <strong>the</strong> applicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> appropriate multipliers that have been calculated for Prince William<br />

County and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> by <strong>the</strong> Bureau <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Commerce,<br />

employing its Regi<strong>on</strong>al Input-Output Model (RIMS II).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se calculati<strong>on</strong>s are estimates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> output value (total c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy, pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings) new<br />

earnings realized by residents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> jobs supported by <strong>the</strong>se outlays (full-time year-round jobs). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

key variables governing <strong>the</strong> magnitude and significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts are <strong>the</strong>ir dollar value, <strong>the</strong> category <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

service or product purchased, <strong>the</strong> direct employment and payroll associated with <strong>the</strong> direct spending, and <strong>the</strong> geographic<br />

unit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysis and <strong>the</strong> complexity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its ec<strong>on</strong>omy. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se determine <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy can provide <strong>the</strong> inputs<br />

and retain <strong>the</strong> outputs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities being analyzed. In this analysis, <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William<br />

County, and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> represent well-developed, diverse, and expansive ec<strong>on</strong>omies that are able to<br />

achieve significant indirect benefits from <strong>the</strong> direct outlays <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> core industries.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> following analysis will examine <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a four-year capital-spending program undertaken by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

to modernize <strong>the</strong> plant and equipment at its Manassas facility. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se capital outlays for c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> and equipment totaled<br />

$178.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and $179 milli<strong>on</strong> in total statewide: vendors located within <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth and<br />

particularly in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> received c<strong>on</strong>tracts to provide <strong>the</strong>se services and equipment.<br />

Annual outlays associated with <strong>the</strong> operati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> Manassas plant are analyzed for 2005. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se operating outlays and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir impacts are annual impacts and recur each year, whereas <strong>the</strong> capital outlays do not recur annually in <strong>the</strong> same magnitudes.<br />

That <strong>the</strong> operating outlays and <strong>the</strong>ir ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts are recurring annually magnifies <strong>the</strong>ir importance over time;<br />

<strong>the</strong> impacts identified herein reflect <strong>on</strong>ly a <strong>on</strong>e-year slice <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an <strong>on</strong>going stream <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> benefits. Operating outlays are divided<br />

into two categories: payroll and operati<strong>on</strong>s. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se divisi<strong>on</strong>s reflect substantially different ec<strong>on</strong>omic impact patterns: payroll<br />

is spent differently than outlays for operati<strong>on</strong>s and <strong>the</strong>refore have different effects <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> local and state ec<strong>on</strong>omies—payroll<br />

fuels c<strong>on</strong>sumer spending while operating outlays support o<strong>the</strong>r vendors, pay for fringe benefits, support daily business<br />

activities, and may result in pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>its and new business investment.


Employment <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> any business is frequently judged by <strong>the</strong> jobs and payroll it generates. While direct job generati<strong>on</strong><br />

is important, a firm’s n<strong>on</strong>-payroll spending usually accounts for far greater job generati<strong>on</strong> than its own workforce.<br />

This is true for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>. Still, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> is a major source <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> jobs with a workforce totaling 1,013 statewide, with 524 employees<br />

residing within Prince William County, and 120 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se employees living in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

were 320 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employees residing in neighboring counties. Combined, 83.3 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s workers live locally<br />

or in adjacent counties. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se are shown in Table 2 al<strong>on</strong>g with <strong>the</strong>ir mean salaries.<br />

Table 2: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>: Employment Pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ile, 2005<br />

Place <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Number Percent Average Annual<br />

Residence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Jobs Of total Income*<br />

City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas 120 11.8 $70,895.24<br />

Prince William (1) 524 51.7 $70,895.24<br />

Neighboring Counties (2) 320 31.6 $69,638.96<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> (3) 1013 100.0 $67,896.56<br />

Source: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc. *includes wages and salary, pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it sharing and b<strong>on</strong>uses. *includes <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s workers residing in <strong>the</strong> City;**this sec<strong>on</strong>dary labor market includes Culpepper, Loudoun,<br />

Fairfax, Fauquier, Stafford and Warren Counties. ***includes all <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> workers residing in <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> total payroll associated with this workforce totaled $68.8 milli<strong>on</strong> in 2005 for a mean salary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $67,897. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

impacts associated with <strong>the</strong>se payroll outlays are shown in Table 3. As labor income and c<strong>on</strong>sumer spending, <strong>the</strong>se outlays<br />

represent a significant revenue base for state income and sale taxes.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> salary multipliers underlying <strong>the</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong>s in Table 3 illustrate <strong>the</strong> cumulative impacts associated with <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s<br />

employment base. In Prince William County, for each dollar in payroll (for workers living in <strong>the</strong> County), <strong>the</strong> County<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omy realized a total benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.52; for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> workers residing in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas <strong>the</strong>ir payroll multiplier was<br />

estimated at 1.26. Prince William County residents captured an additi<strong>on</strong>al $316,410 in new pers<strong>on</strong>al income (wages and<br />

salaries) for each $1,000,000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s payroll earned by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> workers living in Prince William County. This added<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings benefit for <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas was estimated at $158,200 in additi<strong>on</strong>al earnings per $1,000,000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

payroll earned by City residents working at <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>. This local spending also supported additi<strong>on</strong>al employment in <strong>the</strong><br />

City and County as well as throughout <strong>the</strong> state and nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> State’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy is more complex and self-c<strong>on</strong>tained (less leakage to adjacent jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s), its multipliers are<br />

larger than those for <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas and Prince William County. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> State’s payroll multiplier for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s workforce<br />

is 2.00; that is, for each dollar <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> payroll paid by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to a state resident worker a total ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $2.00<br />

was generated. This payroll spending in <strong>the</strong> state generated additi<strong>on</strong>al pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings at <strong>the</strong> rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $597,392 per<br />

$1,000,000 in direct <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> payroll outlay. This payroll effect is significant. For each $1.00 in direct payroll outlay made<br />

by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, an additi<strong>on</strong>al $0.60 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> wage income was generated to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> workers<br />

residing in <strong>the</strong> state.<br />

Lastly, <strong>the</strong> indirect employment impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this payroll spending in <strong>the</strong> State (and nati<strong>on</strong>) was greater than <strong>the</strong> direct employ-


ment effect. In 2005, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employed 1,013 workers within <strong>the</strong> State and its payroll spending supported an additi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

1,802 full-time equivalent, year-round jobs. While <strong>the</strong>se indirect jobs were not restricted to <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth, many were<br />

located within <strong>the</strong> state. Overall, <strong>the</strong> magnitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s payroll has an impact far exceeds <strong>the</strong>ir direct value at both local<br />

and state levels, as measured by <strong>the</strong>ir c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to total output, pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings, and job growth.<br />

Table 3: Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Payroll Spend By <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Workforce* (in milli<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2005 dollars)<br />

Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> Payroll Total Pers<strong>on</strong>al Jobs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Residence Outlay (1) Output (2) Earnings (3) Supported (4)<br />

City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas $8.507 $10.740 $1.346 5.6<br />

Prince William** $37.149 $56.652 $11.754 494.1<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>*** $68.779 $137.558 $41.088 1802.0<br />

Sources: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc., GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis Notes: (1) includes wages and salaries, pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it sharing, and b<strong>on</strong>uses; (2) <strong>the</strong> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services generated directly<br />

and indirectly as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> initial payroll outlay within <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>; (3) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al earnings occurring within <strong>the</strong> respective jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> new ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities supported by <strong>the</strong><br />

payroll outlay; (4) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al new jobs supported nati<strong>on</strong>wide by <strong>the</strong> spending and re-spending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> new payroll dollars. *<strong>the</strong>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts recur annually. **includes <strong>the</strong> payroll <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

workers residing in <strong>the</strong> City. ***includes <strong>the</strong> payroll <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> workers residing in Prince William County.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s Of Capital Outlays, 2002–2005<br />

While payroll spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> has been shown to have important and recurring benefits to <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince<br />

William County, and Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth ec<strong>on</strong>omies, spending for <strong>the</strong> purchase <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services from <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>-based vendors<br />

has even greater ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts as <strong>the</strong>se outlays include a combinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> payroll, materials, overhead, and pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>it.<br />

As <strong>the</strong>se outlays are passed through <strong>the</strong> wide range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> suppliers, <strong>the</strong>y generate employment and income benefits that span<br />

<strong>the</strong> full breadth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> local, regi<strong>on</strong>al, and state ec<strong>on</strong>omies. In additi<strong>on</strong> to supporting a large multiplier effect and adding<br />

new pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings and jobs to <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy, <strong>the</strong>se m<strong>on</strong>etary flows have important fiscal implicati<strong>on</strong>s at both <strong>the</strong> local<br />

and state levels.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> two principal categories <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> are capital and operating outlays. Capital spending includes outlays<br />

for <strong>the</strong> purchase <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supplies and equipment, including <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> and modernizati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> physical facilities that have a<br />

minimum life expectancy that spans several years. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se are frequently financed from borrowing and are amortized over <strong>the</strong><br />

respective useful life <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> capital improvement. Capital outlays tend to be uneven over time.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> undertook a significant capital improvement program that spanned <strong>the</strong> 2002–2005 period to modernize its Manassas<br />

plant and equipment, positi<strong>on</strong>ing its product lines to reflect new technologies and producti<strong>on</strong> efficiencies in <strong>the</strong> increasingly<br />

competitive global market place. This capital spending totaled $1.5 billi<strong>on</strong> with vendors located within <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth<br />

capturing $179 milli<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se capital outlays. With <strong>the</strong> excepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $800,000, all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this capital spending in <strong>the</strong> state was<br />

captured by vendors and c<strong>on</strong>tractors located within Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Of this capital spending occurring within <strong>the</strong> State,<br />

c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> and materials spending accounted for almost all <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se outlays. Equipment purchases accounted for $1.2 billi<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se modernizati<strong>on</strong> outlays with <strong>the</strong>se occurring almost entirely outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> State. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

capital outlays in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and statewide are summarized in Table 4.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital outlays captured by firms located in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> totaled $178.2 milli<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se direct capital outlays had a<br />

multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.5656 accounting for a total c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>’s gross regi<strong>on</strong>al product <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $279 milli<strong>on</strong> for <strong>the</strong> 2002-<br />

2005 period. At <strong>the</strong> state level, with its larger multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.10, <strong>the</strong>se capital outlays added a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $376.2 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong><br />

state’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy over this period.


<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se capital outlays and <strong>the</strong> work <strong>the</strong>y supported within Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and statewide generated additi<strong>on</strong>al pers<strong>on</strong>al<br />

earnings for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents totaling $56.5 milli<strong>on</strong> in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and $99.3 milli<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong> state level. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se new<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings are taxable wage and salary payments received bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong> direct payroll paid to <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employees (as<br />

summarized previously in Table 2).<br />

Since spending was recycled through <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy, this capital spending and respending within <strong>the</strong> local and state (and<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>al) ec<strong>on</strong>omies also supports vendor jobs and jobs having broad-based effects. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s capital spending, captured by<br />

vendors and c<strong>on</strong>tractors located in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, supported 1,560 new jobs over <strong>the</strong> four-year period. At <strong>the</strong> state level<br />

this capital spending supported 3,750 jobs. While most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se jobs would be located in <strong>the</strong> state, some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se job effects<br />

would accrue to ec<strong>on</strong>omies in surrounding states and across <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Table 4: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s for Capital Outlays By <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for<br />

Plant and Equipment Modernizati<strong>on</strong>, FY 2002-2005 (in milli<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> current year dollars)<br />

Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> Capital Total Pers<strong>on</strong>al Jobs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vendor Outlay (1) Output Earnings (3) Supported (4)<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> $178.2 $279.0 $56.5 1560<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>* $179.0 $376.2 $99.3 3760<br />

Sources: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc., GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis Notes: (1) accumulated capital spending reported by locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vendor; (2) <strong>the</strong> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services generated<br />

directly and indirectly as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> capital outlays within <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>; (3) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al earnings generated within <strong>the</strong> respective jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> new ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities supported by<br />

<strong>the</strong> capital outlays; (4) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al new jobs supported nati<strong>on</strong>wide by <strong>the</strong> spending and re-spending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> new capital outlays.*includes <strong>the</strong> capital outlays received by firms located in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

While this analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital spending was c<strong>on</strong>fined to <strong>the</strong> fiscal year 2002–2005 period, c<strong>on</strong>tinuing capital improvements<br />

are programmed to maintain <strong>the</strong> plant’s efficiency and competitiveness. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se capital outlays are estimated to fall in <strong>the</strong><br />

$300–400 milli<strong>on</strong> range annually. Depending <strong>on</strong> changes in product strategy, <strong>the</strong>se outlays could be c<strong>on</strong>siderably higher.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se outlays that would be captured by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>-based firms is not known at this time. However, based <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and n<strong>on</strong>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> split <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> capital outlays for <strong>the</strong> 2002–2005 period (15/85%), local vendors can expect to<br />

benefit by at least $50 milli<strong>on</strong> annually from c<strong>on</strong>tinued capital spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to maintain and upgrade its Manassas<br />

plant.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Operating Outlays<br />

Annual spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to operate its Manassas plant involves both payroll (as discussed previously) and a wide range<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supporting overhead expenditures. Of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s operating outlays in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas and Prince William County,<br />

payroll accounted for approximately 37 percent in 2005. N<strong>on</strong>-payroll spending includes service c<strong>on</strong>tracts and c<strong>on</strong>tract labor,<br />

pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al and business services, outlays for regular maintenance and repairs, utilities, taxes, leases, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice equipment<br />

and supplies. Statewide operating outlays reflect a slightly different mix <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expenditures with direct payroll accounting<br />

for 33.6 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> total annual spending.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> operating outlays bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir magnitude ($49.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, $78.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in Prince<br />

William County, and $134.7 milli<strong>on</strong> across Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>) is that <strong>the</strong>y recur each year. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore, <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts<br />

<strong>the</strong>y generate, as reported in Table 5, are not <strong>on</strong>e-time benefits such as those that flow from capital outlays, but c<strong>on</strong>tinue to<br />

support <strong>the</strong> local and state ec<strong>on</strong>omies year after year.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> $49.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in direct operating outlays that <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> spent in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas in 2005 added a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $63.2 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

to <strong>the</strong> City’s estimated gross city product that year, reflecting a multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> approximately 1.2845; that is, for each<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>al $1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for its annual operati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> City’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy realized a total benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.28. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally,<br />

this local spending generated new annual pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings for City residents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $11.7 milli<strong>on</strong> and supported 400 jobs


(in <strong>the</strong> city, state, and nati<strong>on</strong>) bey<strong>on</strong>d those directly compensated for by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Table 5: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Annual Operati<strong>on</strong>s Outlays by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>** (in milli<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2005 dollars)<br />

Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> Operating Total Pers<strong>on</strong>al Jobs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vendor Outlay (1) Output (2) Earnings (3) Supported (4)<br />

City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas $49.2 $63.2 $11.7 400<br />

Prince William** $78.2 $121.3 $22.4 767<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>* $134.7 $217.6 $59.4 2232<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>*** $135.7 $285.6 $76.9 2824<br />

Sources: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc., GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis Notes: (1) reported by locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vendor; (2) <strong>the</strong> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services generated directly and indirectly as a result<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> initial operating outlays within <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>; (3) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al earnings generated within <strong>the</strong> respective jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> new ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities supported by <strong>the</strong> operating outlays; (4)<br />

<strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al new jobs supported nati<strong>on</strong>wide by <strong>the</strong> spending and re-spending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> new operating expenditures. *Manassas and Prince William County totals are included in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> totals are included in <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact totals. **<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts recur annually.<br />

Operati<strong>on</strong>s spending accruing to businesses located in Prince William County totaled $78.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in 2005. This spending<br />

added $121.3 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> County’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy, reflecting a multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.551, generated additi<strong>on</strong>al pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings to<br />

<strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> County residents totaling $22.4 milli<strong>on</strong>, and supported 767 jobs in <strong>the</strong> County, state, and nati<strong>on</strong> bey<strong>on</strong>d those<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> payroll.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits accruing to <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas and Prince William County, and those captured elsewhere in<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, added a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $217.6 to its gross regi<strong>on</strong>al product in 2005, generated $59.4 in new pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings<br />

for Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents (bey<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> workers with a payroll <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $61.7 milli<strong>on</strong>), and supported<br />

2,232 jobs within <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>, state, and nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> state level, <strong>the</strong>se multipliers are larger reflecting its more complex and self-c<strong>on</strong>tained ec<strong>on</strong>omy (less m<strong>on</strong>etary leakage<br />

to adjacent jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> $135.7 milli<strong>on</strong> in direct operating outlays spent by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> State generated $285.6<br />

milli<strong>on</strong> in total ec<strong>on</strong>omic impact reflecting a multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.9057; that is, for each additi<strong>on</strong>al $1 spent by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> within<br />

<strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, its gross state product realizes a total benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.91. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, $76.9 milli<strong>on</strong> in new<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings were generated in 2005 to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> state residents with operating outlays supporting 2,824 jobs (fulltime,<br />

year-round equivalent) bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong> 1,013 workers directly compensated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se additi<strong>on</strong>al business sales<br />

and pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings have important fiscal implicati<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> State as well as to <strong>the</strong> local jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s where <strong>the</strong>ir vendors<br />

are located and <strong>the</strong>ir workers reside.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fiscal <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas<br />

Calculating <strong>the</strong> revenue and expenditure flows generated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas involved applicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

GMU fiscal model that allocates <strong>the</strong> City’s operating revenues and expenditures to <strong>the</strong>ir direct sources. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis for this<br />

analysis was <strong>the</strong> City’s 2005 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> fiscal model was modified and updated to reflect <strong>the</strong> revenue and expenditure allocati<strong>on</strong>s by land use type for <strong>the</strong> City<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas (this model had been used recently for ano<strong>the</strong>r project in <strong>the</strong> City using data from <strong>the</strong> 2005 CAFR). Based <strong>on</strong><br />

this analysis, it had been determined that <strong>the</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-property tax revenues associated with n<strong>on</strong>-residential land uses generated<br />

$639.09 <strong>on</strong> a per-employee basis. Actual revenues paid by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to <strong>the</strong> City for real estate and for o<strong>the</strong>r forms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> property<br />

were used to determine <strong>the</strong> total revenue base associated with <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Similarly, this fiscal analysis calculated <strong>the</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-residential demands <strong>on</strong> city services as expressed <strong>on</strong> a per-employee basis;


<strong>the</strong>se equaled $797.77. This expenditure demand included <strong>the</strong> actual usage as well as <strong>the</strong> availability or general benefit received<br />

by employees (and <strong>the</strong>ir employers) from being located within <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas (e.g., <strong>the</strong>oretically, expenditures<br />

for General Government equally benefit all residents and employees working within <strong>the</strong> City). Expenditures also include<br />

debt service; this was allocated between residential and n<strong>on</strong>-residential beneficiaries in proporti<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> purpose <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

public debt (e.g., capital borrowing for school c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> was charged <strong>on</strong>ly to residential uses).<br />

Applying this model and its per-employee revenue and expenditure multipliers produced total values needed to calculate <strong>the</strong><br />

fiscal impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas in FY 2005. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this calculati<strong>on</strong> are presented in Table 6. With<br />

total estimated revenues <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $5.6 milli<strong>on</strong>—<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which 90 percent are in <strong>the</strong> form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct payments for real estate and pers<strong>on</strong>al<br />

property, and with <strong>the</strong> dollar value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> demands <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City’s services totaling an estimated at $808,141—<strong>the</strong> significance<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s fiscal c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> City is clear. Revenues exceed expenditure demand by a factor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 7; that is, for every<br />

$1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expenditure demand, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tributed $6.90 in revenues to <strong>the</strong> City’s treasury for a net benefit totaling $4.85 milli<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Table 6: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fiscal <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas<br />

Sources<br />

Values<br />

Revenues<br />

Real Estate and O<strong>the</strong>r Property Taxes $5,010,000<br />

N<strong>on</strong>-Property Tax Revenues* $647,398<br />

Total Revenues $5,567,400<br />

Total Expenditures** $808,141<br />

Net fiscal <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> (Revenues/Expenditures) $4,849,259<br />

Net Fiscal Benefit Per <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> Employee $4,787<br />

Sources: City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis. *based <strong>on</strong> per employee n<strong>on</strong>-property tax revenue multiplier for 2005. **based <strong>on</strong> per<br />

employee expenditure-demand multiplier for 2005.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> magnitude <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this net fiscal benefit can be calibrated by expressing it in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s employment base. For each<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s 1,013 Manassas workers, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s net fiscal c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> City equals $4,787. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this<br />

net fiscal c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> can be seen by calculating <strong>the</strong> budget impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its absence; that is, if it had not existed. Without <strong>the</strong><br />

revenue surplus generated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in FY 2005, <strong>the</strong> City’s budget would have had a deficit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $3.665 milli<strong>on</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

registering a surplus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.184. In effect, this surplus allowed <strong>the</strong> City to lower its real estate tax rate in 2005 and to provide<br />

public services to its residents that o<strong>the</strong>rwise would have required a higher tax burden. In <strong>the</strong> absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this fiscal surplus,<br />

<strong>the</strong> real estate tax rate could have <strong>on</strong>ly been reduced from it 2004 rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.15 per $100 assessed valuati<strong>on</strong> to $1.086 per<br />

$100 ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> $1.00 rate actually adopted in 2005 with no year-end surplus. This fiscal benefit has important implicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

to <strong>the</strong> City’s budget and to <strong>the</strong> added value its residents receive for <strong>the</strong> taxes <strong>the</strong>y pay.<br />

Summary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts generated by capital and operating expenditures by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William<br />

County, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> can be measured in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct and total job creati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

added pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings that will accrue to local and state residents, and <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al jobs supported by this spending<br />

bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong> direct workforce employed <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se impacts are generated both by capital outlays that extend for <strong>the</strong><br />

durati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plants and equipment modernizati<strong>on</strong> and occur <strong>on</strong> an annual basis from direct payroll and operating outlays by<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for <strong>the</strong> daily operati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its Manassas plant.


<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employed 120 residents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas in 2005 with a total payroll <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $8.5 milli<strong>on</strong>. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, its operating<br />

expenditures captured by vendors located in <strong>the</strong> City, added $49.2 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> City’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy, generated $11.7<br />

milli<strong>on</strong> in new pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> City residents, and supported 400 jobs bey<strong>on</strong>d those compensated for<br />

directly by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s 1,013 workers had a total annual payroll <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $68.8 milli<strong>on</strong>. This payroll spending added $137.6 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong><br />

state’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy, generated $41.1 milli<strong>on</strong> in additi<strong>on</strong>al pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> state residents and supported a total<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1,802 jobs nati<strong>on</strong>wide. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s operating outlays totaled $135.7 milli<strong>on</strong> in 2005 and added a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $285.6 milli<strong>on</strong> to<br />

<strong>the</strong> state’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy, generated an additi<strong>on</strong>al $76.9 milli<strong>on</strong> in pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings, and supported 2,824 jobs nati<strong>on</strong>wide.<br />

Capital spending captured by state businesses over <strong>the</strong> 2002–2005 period totaled $179 milli<strong>on</strong>. This capital spending added<br />

a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $376.2 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> state’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy over this four-year period, generated $99.3 milli<strong>on</strong> in new pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings<br />

for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents, and supported 3,760 jobs nati<strong>on</strong>wide.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas and State, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s presence represents a major net fiscal benefit. At <strong>the</strong> City level, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> was<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sible for generating revenues estimated at $5.6 milli<strong>on</strong> in FY 2005, including $5 milli<strong>on</strong> in real estate and o<strong>the</strong>r property<br />

taxes. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> received, directly or indirectly, an estimated $808,141 in locally funded services during <strong>the</strong> year, yielding<br />

a net fiscal benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $4.85 milli<strong>on</strong>, or $4,787 per employee. In <strong>the</strong> absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s net fiscal benefit, <strong>the</strong> City’s budget<br />

would have had experienced a $3.665 milli<strong>on</strong> deficit and would have had to reduce its level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> services or raise its real estate<br />

tax rate. At <strong>the</strong> state level in FY2005, <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> paid $5.96 milli<strong>on</strong> in corporate taxes, payroll withholding, and unemployment<br />

taxes.<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r recurring ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits generated by operating outlays or <strong>on</strong>e-time benefits flowing from capital expenditures,<br />

<strong>the</strong>se income and employment impacts are significant in <strong>the</strong>ir magnitudes. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>y c<strong>on</strong>stitute important ec<strong>on</strong>omic and fiscal<br />

resources for local and state government far exceeding <strong>the</strong> direct dollar value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s direct outlay. As <strong>the</strong> operating<br />

expenditures recur (and likely increase) annually, <strong>the</strong>se expanded ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits will c<strong>on</strong>tinue to accrue annually to <strong>the</strong><br />

City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, Prince William County, and <strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!