01.11.2014 Views

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(in <strong>the</strong> city, state, and nati<strong>on</strong>) bey<strong>on</strong>d those directly compensated for by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Table 5: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Annual Operati<strong>on</strong>s Outlays by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>** (in milli<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2005 dollars)<br />

Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> Operating Total Pers<strong>on</strong>al Jobs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vendor Outlay (1) Output (2) Earnings (3) Supported (4)<br />

City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas $49.2 $63.2 $11.7 400<br />

Prince William** $78.2 $121.3 $22.4 767<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>* $134.7 $217.6 $59.4 2232<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>*** $135.7 $285.6 $76.9 2824<br />

Sources: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc., GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis Notes: (1) reported by locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vendor; (2) <strong>the</strong> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services generated directly and indirectly as a result<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> initial operating outlays within <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>; (3) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al earnings generated within <strong>the</strong> respective jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> new ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities supported by <strong>the</strong> operating outlays; (4)<br />

<strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al new jobs supported nati<strong>on</strong>wide by <strong>the</strong> spending and re-spending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> new operating expenditures. *Manassas and Prince William County totals are included in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> totals are included in <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact totals. **<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts recur annually.<br />

Operati<strong>on</strong>s spending accruing to businesses located in Prince William County totaled $78.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in 2005. This spending<br />

added $121.3 milli<strong>on</strong> to <strong>the</strong> County’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy, reflecting a multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.551, generated additi<strong>on</strong>al pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings to<br />

<strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> County residents totaling $22.4 milli<strong>on</strong>, and supported 767 jobs in <strong>the</strong> County, state, and nati<strong>on</strong> bey<strong>on</strong>d those<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> payroll.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits accruing to <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas and Prince William County, and those captured elsewhere in<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, added a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $217.6 to its gross regi<strong>on</strong>al product in 2005, generated $59.4 in new pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings<br />

for Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents (bey<strong>on</strong>d <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> workers with a payroll <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $61.7 milli<strong>on</strong>), and supported<br />

2,232 jobs within <strong>the</strong> regi<strong>on</strong>, state, and nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> state level, <strong>the</strong>se multipliers are larger reflecting its more complex and self-c<strong>on</strong>tained ec<strong>on</strong>omy (less m<strong>on</strong>etary leakage<br />

to adjacent jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> $135.7 milli<strong>on</strong> in direct operating outlays spent by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> State generated $285.6<br />

milli<strong>on</strong> in total ec<strong>on</strong>omic impact reflecting a multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1.9057; that is, for each additi<strong>on</strong>al $1 spent by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> within<br />

<strong>the</strong> Comm<strong>on</strong>wealth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, its gross state product realizes a total benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.91. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, $76.9 milli<strong>on</strong> in new<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings were generated in 2005 to <strong>the</strong> benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> state residents with operating outlays supporting 2,824 jobs (fulltime,<br />

year-round equivalent) bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong> 1,013 workers directly compensated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se additi<strong>on</strong>al business sales<br />

and pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings have important fiscal implicati<strong>on</strong>s to <strong>the</strong> State as well as to <strong>the</strong> local jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>s where <strong>the</strong>ir vendors<br />

are located and <strong>the</strong>ir workers reside.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fiscal <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas<br />

Calculating <strong>the</strong> revenue and expenditure flows generated by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas involved applicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

GMU fiscal model that allocates <strong>the</strong> City’s operating revenues and expenditures to <strong>the</strong>ir direct sources. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis for this<br />

analysis was <strong>the</strong> City’s 2005 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> fiscal model was modified and updated to reflect <strong>the</strong> revenue and expenditure allocati<strong>on</strong>s by land use type for <strong>the</strong> City<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas (this model had been used recently for ano<strong>the</strong>r project in <strong>the</strong> City using data from <strong>the</strong> 2005 CAFR). Based <strong>on</strong><br />

this analysis, it had been determined that <strong>the</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-property tax revenues associated with n<strong>on</strong>-residential land uses generated<br />

$639.09 <strong>on</strong> a per-employee basis. Actual revenues paid by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to <strong>the</strong> City for real estate and for o<strong>the</strong>r forms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> property<br />

were used to determine <strong>the</strong> total revenue base associated with <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

Similarly, this fiscal analysis calculated <strong>the</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-residential demands <strong>on</strong> city services as expressed <strong>on</strong> a per-employee basis;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!