01.11.2014 Views

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

The Impact of Micron Technology Virginia on the Economies of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se capital outlays and <strong>the</strong> work <strong>the</strong>y supported within Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and statewide generated additi<strong>on</strong>al pers<strong>on</strong>al<br />

earnings for <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> residents totaling $56.5 milli<strong>on</strong> in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and $99.3 milli<strong>on</strong> at <strong>the</strong> state level. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se new<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings are taxable wage and salary payments received bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong> direct payroll paid to <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> employees (as<br />

summarized previously in Table 2).<br />

Since spending was recycled through <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omy, this capital spending and respending within <strong>the</strong> local and state (and<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>al) ec<strong>on</strong>omies also supports vendor jobs and jobs having broad-based effects. <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s capital spending, captured by<br />

vendors and c<strong>on</strong>tractors located in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>, supported 1,560 new jobs over <strong>the</strong> four-year period. At <strong>the</strong> state level<br />

this capital spending supported 3,750 jobs. While most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se jobs would be located in <strong>the</strong> state, some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se job effects<br />

would accrue to ec<strong>on</strong>omies in surrounding states and across <strong>the</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Table 4: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s for Capital Outlays By <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for<br />

Plant and Equipment Modernizati<strong>on</strong>, FY 2002-2005 (in milli<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> current year dollars)<br />

Jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> Capital Total Pers<strong>on</strong>al Jobs<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vendor Outlay (1) Output Earnings (3) Supported (4)<br />

Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> $178.2 $279.0 $56.5 1560<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>* $179.0 $376.2 $99.3 3760<br />

Sources: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Technology</str<strong>on</strong>g>, Inc., GMU Center for Regi<strong>on</strong>al Analysis Notes: (1) accumulated capital spending reported by locati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> vendor; (2) <strong>the</strong> total value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> goods and services generated<br />

directly and indirectly as a result <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> capital outlays within <strong>the</strong> jurisdicti<strong>on</strong>; (3) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al earnings generated within <strong>the</strong> respective jurisdicti<strong>on</strong> from <strong>the</strong> new ec<strong>on</strong>omic activities supported by<br />

<strong>the</strong> capital outlays; (4) <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong>al new jobs supported nati<strong>on</strong>wide by <strong>the</strong> spending and re-spending <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> new capital outlays.*includes <strong>the</strong> capital outlays received by firms located in Nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

While this analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> capital spending was c<strong>on</strong>fined to <strong>the</strong> fiscal year 2002–2005 period, c<strong>on</strong>tinuing capital improvements<br />

are programmed to maintain <strong>the</strong> plant’s efficiency and competitiveness. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>se capital outlays are estimated to fall in <strong>the</strong><br />

$300–400 milli<strong>on</strong> range annually. Depending <strong>on</strong> changes in product strategy, <strong>the</strong>se outlays could be c<strong>on</strong>siderably higher.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> porti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong>se outlays that would be captured by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>-based firms is not known at this time. However, based <strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> and n<strong>on</strong>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g> split <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> capital outlays for <strong>the</strong> 2002–2005 period (15/85%), local vendors can expect to<br />

benefit by at least $50 milli<strong>on</strong> annually from c<strong>on</strong>tinued capital spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to maintain and upgrade its Manassas<br />

plant.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>Impact</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Operating Outlays<br />

Annual spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> to operate its Manassas plant involves both payroll (as discussed previously) and a wide range<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supporting overhead expenditures. Of <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>’s operating outlays in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas and Prince William County,<br />

payroll accounted for approximately 37 percent in 2005. N<strong>on</strong>-payroll spending includes service c<strong>on</strong>tracts and c<strong>on</strong>tract labor,<br />

pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al and business services, outlays for regular maintenance and repairs, utilities, taxes, leases, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice equipment<br />

and supplies. Statewide operating outlays reflect a slightly different mix <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> expenditures with direct payroll accounting<br />

for 33.6 percent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> total annual spending.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> operating outlays bey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong>ir magnitude ($49.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas, $78.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in Prince<br />

William County, and $134.7 milli<strong>on</strong> across Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <str<strong>on</strong>g>Virginia</str<strong>on</strong>g>) is that <strong>the</strong>y recur each year. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore, <strong>the</strong> ec<strong>on</strong>omic impacts<br />

<strong>the</strong>y generate, as reported in Table 5, are not <strong>on</strong>e-time benefits such as those that flow from capital outlays, but c<strong>on</strong>tinue to<br />

support <strong>the</strong> local and state ec<strong>on</strong>omies year after year.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> $49.2 milli<strong>on</strong> in direct operating outlays that <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> spent in <strong>the</strong> City <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Manassas in 2005 added a total <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $63.2 milli<strong>on</strong><br />

to <strong>the</strong> City’s estimated gross city product that year, reflecting a multiplier <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> approximately 1.2845; that is, for each<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>al $1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spending by <str<strong>on</strong>g>Micr<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for its annual operati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> City’s ec<strong>on</strong>omy realized a total benefit <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $1.28. Additi<strong>on</strong>ally,<br />

this local spending generated new annual pers<strong>on</strong>al earnings for City residents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> $11.7 milli<strong>on</strong> and supported 400 jobs

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!