TCDLA Texas Criminal Law Short Course - Voice For The Defense ...
TCDLA Texas Criminal Law Short Course - Voice For The Defense ...
TCDLA Texas Criminal Law Short Course - Voice For The Defense ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
President's Column<br />
Come to <strong>For</strong>t Worth<br />
This issue of <strong>Voice</strong> for the <strong>Defense</strong> is This fictional equation is often repeated<br />
Your Personal invitation to attend our by our Assistant District Attorneys in plea<br />
"First Annual" <strong>Texas</strong> <strong>Criminal</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Short</strong> negotiations, It is &perfect example of the<br />
<strong>Course</strong>, September 28-30, 19% at the psychological power of repeating the Big<br />
Hyatt Regency in <strong>For</strong>t Worth. Just Lie. TDC's statistics show that the myth<br />
photocopy the application and mail it in.-\ finds support only when sentences are<br />
Your favorite judges will be at the Annual short, and are preceded by lengthy jail<br />
Judicial Conference, also in <strong>For</strong>t Worth, time.<br />
at the same time. So. let's - eo! <strong>TCDLA</strong> <strong>The</strong> true average time served is above<br />
First Vice-president Tim Evans is planning 25%.<br />
a major social for Friday night at the con- <strong>The</strong> range of possibilities goes all the<br />
clusion of the seminar, and you are en- way to day-for-day. Our Board specialist<br />
couraged to be our guest when the <strong>TCDLA</strong> in prison matters, Bill Habem, advises that<br />
Board meets on Saturday.<br />
one-month-per-year is achieved only in a<br />
This will he the first meeting of the full small fraction of "optimum" cases-first<br />
1988-89 Board of Directors and, with your offenders, no weapons, no victim or ofhelp,<br />
we will set our priorities for the year. ficial protest, etc.<br />
<strong>For</strong> example, we will take a preliminary <strong>The</strong> calendar time served by <strong>Texas</strong> inlook<br />
at what defense lawyers will be fac- mates for specific offense conduct remains<br />
ing when the legislature convenes in above the national average.<br />
January. Some news publishers and politi- Nevertheiess, this "Special Report" by<br />
cians are already beating the drum for the Post had an obvious purpose: Building<br />
greater suffering for defendants and a foundation for pupular icceptance of new<br />
defenders. In Houston, we've had an en- laws-laws that could actunllv anmlifv the<br />
& .<br />
tite substation of our city's police force twin disasters of prison overcrowding and<br />
shamed and disgraced by the disclosure underfunded rehabilitation programs. <strong>The</strong><br />
that more than a hundred citizens were put "solutions" being proposed by the Goverin<br />
the penitentiary in the last year or two nor's <strong>Criminal</strong> Justice Task <strong>For</strong>ce include:<br />
by perjured testimony-and that many of<br />
the victims of these police crimes were innocent!<br />
Predictably, "opinion leaders"<br />
from certain established interests are<br />
distracting the attention of the citizenry<br />
from the need for police reform.<br />
On Sunday, August 7, the Ho~rston Post<br />
devoted three pages to the dilemma created<br />
by our legacy of mnning the <strong>Texas</strong> Department<br />
of Corrections as an advanced school<br />
for crime: <strong>The</strong> articles rehashed old<br />
themes, including the claim that sentences<br />
are too short. <strong>The</strong> Post said that Houston's<br />
"finest" are "demoralized" by the common<br />
myth that a typical sentence is served<br />
at the rate of one-month-per-year, before<br />
parole.<br />
1. Increasing actual time served (to<br />
reduce overcrowding?).<br />
2. More forfeitures (zero tolerance?).<br />
3. Mandatory drug testing for all<br />
parolees (who is making money on<br />
the marketing of these testing<br />
programs?).<br />
4. Requiring educational acheivement<br />
at the high school level as a prerequisite<br />
for parole.<br />
5. Giving the prosecution theexclusive<br />
right to decide whether Judge or<br />
Jury will assess punishment (whose<br />
right of trial by jury is it, anyway?).<br />
6. Admit the uncorroborated testimony<br />
of any officer in whose cus-<br />
Ed Mallett<br />
tody the defendant gave an unsworn,<br />
unrecorded, informal "oral<br />
confession."<br />
7. Admit illegally seized evidence,<br />
where the officers testify to their<br />
subjective "good faith" (ignorance<br />
of the law may be an excuse).<br />
8. Enhance the "rights of victims."<br />
9. Let private industry "employ" inmates<br />
who are confined at TDC.<br />
10. Consider alternatives to imprisonment.<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>TCDLA</strong> needs to do more than<br />
identify the weaknesses and contradictions<br />
in much of the above. We need to thoughtfully<br />
encourage reform by the lawmakers<br />
while exposing the sheer folly of trying to<br />
increase public safety by locking more<br />
people up and holding them in unairconditioned,<br />
single sex, crowded, concrete<br />
and steel rooms, with little in the way of<br />
individual responsibility, for longer<br />
periods, then releasing them with shortened<br />
periods of supervision on the streets.<br />
Already the American "Gulag" imprisons<br />
a higher percentage of our citizens than<br />
any "civilized" country except the Soviet<br />
Union and South Africa. This never-ending<br />
rhetoric about a "war on crime" is,<br />
I imagine, particularly attractive to the<br />
dark side of the American psyche-those<br />
I<br />
4 VOICE for the <strong>Defense</strong> / September 1988