01.11.2014 Views

TCDLA Texas Criminal Law Short Course - Voice For The Defense ...

TCDLA Texas Criminal Law Short Course - Voice For The Defense ...

TCDLA Texas Criminal Law Short Course - Voice For The Defense ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RICARDO FLORES<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> Bar No. 07166500<br />

106 S. 12th Street, Suite 116<br />

Edinburg, <strong>Texas</strong> 78539<br />

(512) 383-0514<br />

THE STATE OFTEXAS 5<br />

COUNTY OP HIDALGO<br />

P<br />

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority,<br />

appeared JOSEPHA. CONNORS III,<br />

who being by duly sworn did depose and<br />

state on his oath the following:<br />

My name is JOSEPH A. CONNORS<br />

111. I am one of the appellant's counsel<br />

in the above styled and numbered cause.<br />

I have read the above and foregoing<br />

motion to amend and/or supplement appellant's<br />

P.D.R. I hereby swear that the<br />

facts contained therein are true and<br />

correct.<br />

JOSEPH A. CONNORS 111<br />

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before<br />

me on this the 22nd day of June, 1988.<br />

ROSALBA GARZA<br />

Notary Public In And <strong>For</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> State of <strong>Texas</strong><br />

Certificate of Service<br />

I, JOSEPH A. CONNORS 111, hereby<br />

certify that on this the 22nd day of June,<br />

1988, a true and correct copy of the fore-<br />

going has been mailed to Hon. <strong>The</strong>odore<br />

C. Hake, Assistant <strong>Criminal</strong> District Attorney,<br />

Hidalgo County Courthouse, Edinburg,<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> 78539; to the State Prosecuting<br />

Attorney, P.O. Box 1240, Austin,<br />

<strong>Texas</strong> 7871 1; and to appellant.<br />

JOSEPH A. CONNORS 111<br />

Official Notice<br />

Court of <strong>Criminal</strong> Appeals<br />

RE: Case No. 1149-87<br />

STYLE: Martinez, Emeterio<br />

On this day, the Appellant's Motion to<br />

Amend the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary<br />

Review was granted. <strong>The</strong> time for<br />

filing the Appellant's Amended Petition for<br />

Discretionary Review was extended to<br />

6-28-88.<br />

Thomas Lowe, Clerk<br />

CDLPmCDLA IT88 Seminar Schedule<br />

and<br />

Tentative FY89 CDLPmCDLA Seminar Schedule<br />

September 2&30,1988<br />

TCDIA Shod <strong>Course</strong><br />

<strong>For</strong>t Wonh - Hyart Regency<br />

October 1,1988<br />

TCDIA Board IiMing<br />

<strong>For</strong>t Worth-HyaU Regency<br />

October 12-14,1988<br />

CDLPFderal <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

Dallas<br />

November 18, 1988<br />

CDLPSex Crinm<br />

Austin<br />

December 1-2, 1988<br />

CDLPSkills <strong>Course</strong><br />

Houston<br />

February 18, 1989<br />

TCDMBoard Meetinpl -<br />

Las Vegas<br />

March 12-17.1989<br />

CD1.P- LTAI<br />

Huntsville<br />

April 21, 1989<br />

TOLABoardIileeling<br />

Austin<br />

May It-12, 1989<br />

CDLPFderal <strong>Criminal</strong><br />

Rio Grandc Valley<br />

June 1546,1989<br />

Jury Selcetion<br />

Mlas or <strong>For</strong>t Worth<br />

June2Wuly 1,1989<br />

SBOT Convention<br />

San Antonio<br />

July 2&21,1989<br />

CDLP-Skills Corn<br />

August 10-1 I, 1989<br />

CDLP-Federal & State Appellate PMdice<br />

DallaV<strong>For</strong>t Won11<br />

August 17-19, 1989<br />

<strong>TCDLA</strong>Shod Cow<br />

FEDERAL<br />

to be determined<br />

June 28, 1988<br />

RE: Case No. 1149-87<br />

STYLE: Martinez, Emeterio<br />

On this day, the Appellant's Amended<br />

Petition for Discretionary Review has been<br />

received and filed by this Court.<br />

Thomas Lowe, Clerk<br />

Batson Revisited<br />

In the "Worst Panel" category, I chose<br />

Garza I,. Stare, 739 S.W. 2d 374 Corpus<br />

Christi, 1987 where the case involved<br />

an offense in a bar and the DA had jurors<br />

who weren't taking the case seriously, or<br />

had a brother-in-law in the pen, or who<br />

"tended not to enforce the law," or who<br />

was a patron of the same bar, or was a<br />

relative of the Sheriff who would not investigate<br />

the case initially, or had served<br />

on an acquitting jury or, finally, knew the<br />

defendant from the racetrack. All this<br />

noted, remember the DA got a conviction.<br />

Well, where does all this leave a lawyer<br />

who finds himself with a jury panel which<br />

looks like either a meeting of a Mafia family<br />

(if you're a DA) or a KKK Klavern (if<br />

you're a defense lawyer)?<br />

Well, you can always holler "Shazam."<br />

42 VOICE for the <strong>Defense</strong> / September 1988

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!