Full Annual Report (PDF 1.39 MB) - Canadian Oil Sands

Canadian Oil Sands Trust Annual Report 2002 34
1% of gross revenue would have applied in either case. As Syncrude is in a
significant capital program, the Trust expects to pay only the minimum
royalty for the next several years. A description of the Crown royalty is
provided in Note 15 of the audited consolidated financial statements.
Administration
Effective November 1, 2002, Canadian Oil Sands terminated the Administrative
Services Agreement with EnCana Corporation (EnCana).The termination
did not result in any material penalties or compensation to either
the Trust or EnCana. Subsequent to the termination, we have leased our
own office space, hired our own staff and engaged various third parties to
replace services previously provided by EnCana under the agreement. We
made the decision to terminate the Administrative Services Agreement to
simplify our administrative structure and to have full-time staff dedicated
to the Trust.
There was a slight reduction in Administration expenses in 2002 from
2001, primarily as a result of having incurred fees under two separate
Administrative Services Agreements from January 1 to July 5, 2001, prior to
the merger of Athabasca Oil Sands Trust and Canadian Oil Sands Trust. In
addition, for the first six months of 2001 until the two trusts were merged,
higher administrative fees had been paid by the Trust’s predecessors.
Insurance Expense
Beginning in the third quarter of 2002, insurance expenses previously classified
as administration costs were disclosed separately to reflect their
significance. Insurance expense was $5.8 million in 2002 compared with
$4.2 million in 2001.The largest component of insurance expense is premiums
paid for business interruption insurance, which is designed to protect
the Trust’s cash flow from the potential of a severe property loss at
Syncrude. Insurance premiums rose in 2002 over 2001 because of limited
capacity in the insurance market combined with numerous industry losses
for this type of insurance. An important risk management component of
the Trust’s Stage 3 financing plan, insurance helps to protect our cash flow
from which the capital program commitments are largely funded, as more
fully explained in the Risk Management section of this MD&A.
Interest Expense
The issuance of the 7.9% US$250 million Senior Notes on August 24, 2001,
by Canadian Oil Sands Limited, a subsidiary of the Trust, raised interest
expenses to $48.7 million in 2002 compared with $28.6 million in 2001.
Depletion and Depreciation
Depletion and depreciation expense decreased $5.4 million in 2002 compared
with 2001. Canadian Oil Sands depreciates and depletes its production
assets on the unit-of-production basis. The decrease in per-barrel
depreciation and depletion is the result of a lower depreciable net asset
base, offset by a lower reserve base. As the Stage 3 expansion is not yet
complete, Canadian Oil Sands has excluded the associated costs of the project
and the related reserves for purposes of calculating our depreciation
and depletion expense. The costs of Stage 3 and accompanying reserves
also will be excluded in the calculation of the 2003 depletion and depreciation
rate, but are expected to be included when Stage 3 is complete,
which is estimated to be the first half of 2005.
Our production in 2002 reduced our proven reserves slightly to 676 million
barrels at December 31, 2002, from 694 million barrels at December 31, 2001.
Our 2002 year-end proven reserves still reflect approximately 35 years of
reserve life at current production rates.
Also included in depletion and depreciation expense is a provision for
future site reclamation, which is accrued at a rate of $0.17 per barrel of
production. Canadian Oil Sands continues to monitor the effectiveness of
this $0.17 per-barrel rate by reviewing Syncrude’s latest estimates on
future site-reclamation costs, which are based on a long-range mine plan
and current regulatory requirements. As at the date of this MD&A, we
believe that the $0.17 per-barrel is a valid rate for such costs.
DEPLETION AND DEPRECIATION
($ millions) 2002 2001 $ Change % Change
Depletion and depreciation 52.0 57.4 (5.4) (9)
Reclamation provision 3.1 3.1 – –
55.1 60.5 (5.4) (9)