DEFINING PROBLEMS. SHAPING SOLUTIONS . - School of Social Service ...
DEFINING PROBLEMS. SHAPING SOLUTIONS . - School of Social Service ...
DEFINING PROBLEMS. SHAPING SOLUTIONS . - School of Social Service ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a d v o c a t e s ’ f o r u m<br />
Chronic disease management requires individuals to be knowledgeable<br />
about the trajectory <strong>of</strong> their disease so that the patient and family members<br />
are able to identify abnormal symptoms. In this model, affected individuals<br />
are expected to comply with physician-ordered regimens for care, such as<br />
the taking <strong>of</strong> daily medications (Gellad et al. 2011). The goal <strong>of</strong> chronic<br />
disease management is to help patients self-identify an irregularity before<br />
the condition progresses to a life-threatening or highly debilitating level.<br />
In order to monitor the disease, chronically ill individuals are expected to<br />
have a regular health care provision team that understands the patient’s<br />
unique medical and social history (Wagner 2000). As a result <strong>of</strong> having<br />
a provision team, the lead physician is able to work with the patient to<br />
maintain wellness through routine appointments even if the patient is<br />
not experiencing problematic symptoms. Collecting a social history and<br />
educating the patient are essential aspects <strong>of</strong> chronic disease management<br />
(Wagner 2000). Patients who understand their disorder, monitor their<br />
symptoms, and comply with prescribed regimens through the assistance <strong>of</strong><br />
integrated care teams are more likely to receive higher quality care (Ouwens<br />
et al. 2004). Therefore, it is important that the medical team is integrated<br />
with social workers or community health workers who are acutely aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />
conditions <strong>of</strong> poverty that may impact a patient’s ability to manage an illness.<br />
Disease management can increase quality <strong>of</strong> life for the patient, but<br />
hospitals and physicians are also key beneficiaries <strong>of</strong> a chronic disease<br />
management approach. From the physician’s perspective, it is advantageous<br />
to regularly interact with individuals at risk for developing complex<br />
symptoms. More closely understanding the patient’s condition helps<br />
providers to identify abnormalities before they progress to dangerous,<br />
complex, and ultimately untreatable levels. It is useful for the medical<br />
team to also understand the patient’s social environment as one’s location<br />
in society may impact the ability to follow through with treatment plans.<br />
Finally, hospital systems are also likely to monetarily benefit from disease<br />
management, as “charity cases,” i.e., poor individuals lacking adequate<br />
health insurance coverage, are less likely to require costly hospital<br />
admission. In addition, due to disease management, pr<strong>of</strong>itable higher acuity<br />
cases can replace less acute cases (Woods et al. 2011).<br />
While the benefits <strong>of</strong> chronic disease management are numerous,<br />
the implementation <strong>of</strong> this model <strong>of</strong> care provision is currently flawed,<br />
especially with regard to low-income, inner-city patients. Adequate<br />
disease control requires that a patient have a regular health-care provider<br />
who coordinates and co-manages care, thereby preventing the patient’s<br />
hospitalization. Unfortunately, however, poor individuals receiving health<br />
insurance through public aid programs, such as Medicaid or the State<br />
53