03.11.2012 Views

GUNS Magazine April 1957

GUNS Magazine April 1957

GUNS Magazine April 1957

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

347 King SiW, NerHximpmn, Man. 1<br />

I<br />

See Your Sporting Goods Deafer<br />

Home For "Biggest Gun<br />

Collection"?<br />

Your "Biggest Gun Collection" story<br />

stirred up quite a rukus down here in Okia-<br />

ioma. From everything I have stored in my<br />

:onscious and subconscious from over ten<br />

rears of trips to Claremore (sometimes three<br />

and four a week) I can never remember Mr.<br />

Davis ever saying he would put the weapons<br />

)n the open market. Mr. Davis told me he<br />

would have preferred the article to have been<br />

left unpublished.<br />

If you care to do a real service for shoot-<br />

irs, the public, gun lovers and so on, you<br />

might start the ball rolling for some real<br />

iction toward the housing of this collection.<br />

[ know not in what way this could be done,<br />

but this state of ours will undoubtedly foul<br />

up again. Texas and Arkansas have already<br />

made overtures for the movement of the col-<br />

lection.<br />

Roy Traband<br />

Tulsa, Oklahoma<br />

Just finished reading about the "Claremore<br />

Gun Collection" and I'm 100 percent in favor<br />

of us powder burners passing the old John B<br />

and collecting enough Texas Kleenex to buy,<br />

beg, borrow, or steal a permanent place for<br />

this collection.<br />

The motion is on the floor-anyone to sec-<br />

ond it?<br />

Tom Horn<br />

Fort Scott. Kansas<br />

Maybe Something Will Be Done<br />

Let me compliment you on a fine maga-<br />

zine. I enjoy almost all of your articles<br />

and read every magazine from cover to cover.<br />

I don't usually take time to write to pub-<br />

lishers, but your magazine is deserving of<br />

praise.<br />

I especially enjoyed the articles, "The<br />

Rawest Racket in Hunting," and "The Case<br />

For Legalized Machine Guns." If more<br />

shooters read them, maybe something will<br />

be done about these matters.<br />

Joe D. Sphar<br />

Wichita, Kansas<br />

Legal Machine Guns<br />

We have just received your February<br />

issue and read Mr. Kvale's thought provok-<br />

ing and informative article, "The Case for<br />

Legalized Machine Guns."<br />

As the largest importers of automatic<br />

weapons into the United States, we feel we<br />

are reasonably qualified to comment affirm-<br />

atively on the positions and conclusions<br />

taken by Mr. Kvale. In summary, we feel<br />

that a sensible modification of the National<br />

Firearms laws, permitting a feasible distri-<br />

bution of automatic weapons among the<br />

citizens, augurs nothing but good if prop-<br />

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR<br />

erly handled. We cannot but believe also<br />

that the Federal government would be re-<br />

lieved from an almost incredible amount of<br />

paper work which attends the internal<br />

transfer and import and export of auto-<br />

matic weapons. This paper work arose out<br />

of the obsolete legislation passed decades<br />

ago to help cure a situation which is now<br />

unconstitutional-namely, national prohibi-<br />

tion. In spite of the splendid cooperation<br />

which we receive from the federal authori-<br />

ties, we feel that they cannot help but ex-<br />

perience the same sense of frustration as we<br />

do in the legal handling of automatic<br />

weapons. We would suggest repeal of the<br />

present legislation on this subject and a<br />

new law which would permit qualified par-<br />

ties to own weapons without payment of<br />

fees obviously designed to extinguish any<br />

traffic in the commodity in question. We<br />

can see no basic objection for having such<br />

arms registered, hut such registration, we<br />

submit, should never be attended with pro-<br />

hibitive fees or impossible qualifications.<br />

In any event, we thank you for your fine<br />

article and look forward to seeing more<br />

like it in your own and other publications<br />

purporting to act in the shooters' interest.<br />

Samuel Cummings, Vice-president<br />

International Armament Corporation<br />

Washington, D. C.<br />

Handload Hazards<br />

Your article "Handloading Bench" was<br />

interesting but also misleading.<br />

I have been in the gun business a lot of<br />

years, and am listed in the May 1951 Rec-<br />

ommended Gunsmith list. This was at Hot<br />

Springs, Arkansas. I have sold a lot of<br />

high power rifles and reloading equipment.<br />

I have seen a number of blown up rifles<br />

and every one had been blown up with<br />

hand loads. I have never seen a rifle that<br />

was blown up by factory loads.<br />

It doesn't make sense to me that a person<br />

can buy a set of tools and with no ex-<br />

perience make better ammunition than our<br />

factories. Immature reloaders are more<br />

likely to make mistakes.<br />

I hunt in Colorado and Texas each year<br />

and always use factory ammunition. I hate<br />

to sell a nice rifle and have the owner blow<br />

it up with ammo that he souped up.<br />

Jack Culpepper<br />

Mt. Pleasant, Texas<br />

Help For Left-Handers<br />

Have just finished reading your article in<br />

<strong>GUNS</strong> about us long suffering left handed<br />

shooters. It was well done and is the first<br />

article I have ever seen in my years as a<br />

target shooter that ever tried to help the<br />

left hander.<br />

William W. Heil<br />

Dumont, N. J.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!