05.11.2014 Views

Final Report - Linkages Project

Final Report - Linkages Project

Final Report - Linkages Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.) Methodology<br />

End-line Sampling. In the end-line surveys of ODs and PD, communes were selected using the population<br />

proportional cluster sampling method, and thereafter fonkontany were also selected the same way. The purpose of<br />

the end-line sampling was to determine the level of ENA indicators across the entire designated district, not just in<br />

specific sites in the district where LINKAGES had been active.<br />

RAP Sampling. The RAP sampling strategy, explained in more detail in Annex 2, was intended to track the levels of<br />

ENA indicators over time from purposively selected communes in the initial focus districts. These communes were<br />

selected by LINKAGES’ field staff during the first year of the project using the criteria that they were actively engaged<br />

with the ENA and BCC strategies. Thus, the data from the RAP provides a reflection of the best results that can be<br />

achieved under the most optimal real life circumstances when active community involvement existed. However, over<br />

time the level of engagement of these communes was not assessed, so there is no way to determine if this fluctuated<br />

or diminished over the years. As with the end-line survey, the selection of fonkontany within these selected<br />

communes was also carried out using a population-proportional cluster sampling method.<br />

Table 1 provides details of the baseline and end-line surveys as well as the RAP 2005 survey.<br />

Table 1: Description of surveys and samples, over time<br />

Survey Type<br />

Survey<br />

Sample Size<br />

Date 0-5 months 6-11 months 12-23 months<br />

Sampling Methodology<br />

Survey<br />

Population<br />

OD Baseline<br />

(by BASICS I<br />

project)<br />

Oct 1996 370 351 720 Stratified cluster sampling across communes,<br />

by district over BASICS’ two focus districts<br />

PD Baseline Feb 2000 320 280 600 Stratified cluster sampling across communes,<br />

by district over 7 focus districts<br />

OD End-line Nov 2005 320 320 320<br />

Stratified cluster sampling across communes,<br />

by district over old BASICS’ two focus<br />

districts<br />

PD End-line Nov 2005 500<br />

7 th district, Betafo, was dropped in 2004)<br />

515 745 Stratified cluster sampling across communes,<br />

by district over 6 focus districts (the original<br />

RAP Oct 2005 320 320 320<br />

Purposeful stratified cluster sampling in 8<br />

focus districts (most active communes only<br />

selected in RAP2000)<br />

Mothers of<br />

children less<br />

than 23<br />

months old<br />

Control Sample. A control site was included in the end line survey and all RAPs. The control was selected to match<br />

project districts and was randomly selected from the same region and eco-system. However, after the survey was<br />

conducted, a decision was made not to use these data, as contamination seemed to have taken place due to<br />

unanticipated factors (e.g. presence of health staff originally trained by project and transferred to control site, active<br />

engagement of other partner groups trained by project, broadcast of project messages into control sites. etc). This<br />

type of problem with maintaining “pure” control sites is not uncommon when broad scale behavior change<br />

communication programs are assessed since health staff trained in project activities may move to new areas of the<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!