07.11.2014 Views

2011 U.S. Dairy Sustainability Report - Innovation Center for US Dairy

2011 U.S. Dairy Sustainability Report - Innovation Center for US Dairy

2011 U.S. Dairy Sustainability Report - Innovation Center for US Dairy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Endnotes<br />

1. “The World Factbook,” Central Intelligence Agency, last modified Jan. 26, 2012, accessed Feb. 7,<br />

2012, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html. The population<br />

projection is based on an estimated 252 worldwide births per minute times an estimated 32<br />

minutes to read this report.<br />

2. National Milk Producers Federation, “2012 <strong>Dairy</strong> Producer Highlights” (2012): 42.<br />

3. R.A. Hoppe and D.E. Banker, “Structure and Finances of U.S. Farms: Family Farm <strong>Report</strong>, 2010<br />

Edition,” <strong>US</strong>DA Economic Research Service, Economic In<strong>for</strong>mation Bulletin No. 66 (July 2010): i.<br />

4. <strong>US</strong>DA Economic Research Service, “Livestock, <strong>Dairy</strong>, and Poultry Outlook: Tables” (Dec. 8, <strong>2011</strong>):<br />

U.S. milk production and related data, http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ldp/LDPTables.htm,<br />

accessed Feb. 7, 2012.<br />

5. Ibid.<br />

6. <strong>US</strong>DA Economic Research Service, “Livestock, <strong>Dairy</strong>, and Poultry Outlook: Tables” (Oct. 31, <strong>2011</strong>):<br />

Milk cows and production by State and region, http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/ldp/LDPTables.<br />

htm, accessed Feb. 7, 2012.<br />

7. <strong>US</strong>DA Rural Development, “Cooperative In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>Report</strong> 1 Section 16: Cooperatives in the <strong>Dairy</strong><br />

Industry” (September 2005). The dairy cooperative percentage is based on 2002 data.<br />

8. U.S. Census Bureau, “Statistical Abstract of the United States: 2012. Table 875, Milk Production and<br />

Manufactured <strong>Dairy</strong> Products 1990 to 2010” (April 27, <strong>2011</strong>): 557.<br />

9. NMPF, “2012 <strong>Dairy</strong> Producer Highlights,” Table 25: Annual Commercial Disappearance of <strong>Dairy</strong><br />

Products, Milk Equivalent, Total Solids Basis.<br />

10. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Consumer Expenditures in 2009,” <strong>Report</strong><br />

1029 (May <strong>2011</strong>): 2. Percentage calculation is based on average annual food expenditures of $6,372<br />

on food purchases; of this amount, $406, or 6.3 percent, was spent on dairy products.<br />

11. Calcium percent is based on S. Gerrior, L. Bente and H. Hiza, “Nutrient Content of the U.S. Food<br />

Supply, 1909-2000,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Nutrition Policy and Promotion,<br />

Home Economics Research <strong>Report</strong> No. 56 (2004). Protein percent is based on <strong>Dairy</strong> Research<br />

Institute, NHANES (2003–2006), Ages 2+ years. Data Source: <strong>Center</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Disease Control and<br />

Prevention, National <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Health Statistics, National Health and Nutrition Examination<br />

Survey. Hyattsville, Md. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, <strong>Center</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Disease<br />

Control and Prevention, 2003-2004; 2005-2006, www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm.<br />

12. J. L. Capper, R. A. Cady and D. E. Bauman, “The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944<br />

compared with 2007,” Journal of Animal Science 87 (March 13, 2009): 2160-2167.<br />

13. <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> U.S. <strong>Dairy</strong>, “U.S. <strong>Dairy</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> Initiative: A Roadmap to Reduce<br />

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Business Value” (2008).<br />

14. P. Con<strong>for</strong>ti, Ed., “Looking Ahead in World Food and Agriculture. Perspectives to 2050” Food and<br />

Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, (<strong>2011</strong>), accessed Oct. 17, <strong>2011</strong>, http://www.fao.org/<br />

docrep/014/i2280e/i2280e00.htm.<br />

15. <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> U.S. <strong>Dairy</strong>, “The Impact of Globalization on the U.S. <strong>Dairy</strong> Industry: Threats,<br />

Opportunities, and Implications” (October 2009). Support and assistance <strong>for</strong> developing food<br />

projections provided by Bain & Company.<br />

16. “World Milk Production,” <strong>Dairy</strong>Co. Datum, accessed Feb. 3, 2012, http://www.dairyco.net/datum/<br />

milk-supply/milk-production/world-milk-production.aspx.<br />

17. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, (Data from: FAO n,d. Livestock Primary.<br />

Production. FAOSTAT), accessed Aug. 18, <strong>2011</strong>, http://faostat.fao.org/site/569/default.aspx#ancor.<br />

18. <strong>US</strong>DA National Agricultural Statistics Service, “Quick Stats,” query of dairy milk price received<br />

measured in $/cwt national average, annual time periods, http://quickstats.nass.usda.<br />

gov/#5B8AFA38-3C66-3B39-9330-19DBAA042A54, accessed Feb. 7, 2012.<br />

19. Ibid.<br />

20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Global Perspective Studies Unit,<br />

“World agriculture: towards 2030/2050” (2006).<br />

21. Organization <strong>for</strong> Economic Co-Operation and Development, and Food and Agriculture<br />

Organization of the United Nations, “Agricultural Outlook 2009-2018, 15th Edition” (June 2009),<br />

http://www.agri-outlook.org/document/56/0,3343,en_36774715_36775671_45421112_1_1_1_1,00.<br />

html.<br />

22. T. Lang, D. Barling, M. Caraher, “Food Policy: Integrating Health, Environment and Society,” Ox<strong>for</strong>d<br />

University Press, 2009.<br />

23. White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity, “Solving the Problem of Childhood Obesity Within a<br />

Generation” (May 2010): 61.<br />

24. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, “Biodiversity and Sustainable Diets:<br />

United Against Hunger” (2010): iii.<br />

25. J. L. Capper, et al., “The environmental impact of dairy production.”<br />

26. School Nutrition Association and National <strong>Dairy</strong> Council, “School Milk: Fat Content Has Declined<br />

Dramatically Since the Early 1990s” (December, 2008): 5.<br />

27. <strong>Dairy</strong> Research Institute, NHANES (2003-2006), Ages 2+ years.<br />

28. A. Drewnowski, “The contribution of milk and milk products to micronutrient density and<br />

af<strong>for</strong>dability of the U.S. diet,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition 30, No. 5 Supplement 1<br />

(October <strong>2011</strong>): 422S-428S.<br />

29. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Dietary<br />

Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Americans, 2010. 7th Edition” (January <strong>2011</strong>): ii.<br />

30. D. A. McCarron and R. P. Heaney, “Estimated Healthcare Savings Associated With Adequate <strong>Dairy</strong><br />

Food Intake,” American Journal of Hypertension 17 (2004): 88-97.<br />

31. Estimated <strong>2011</strong> hours reflect stakeholder participation in <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Center</strong> sustainability initiatives.<br />

Business value is based on a $115 hourly rate to reflect the value of volunteer stakeholder<br />

expertise, participation and work product. Stakeholder hours are tracked in an internal database.<br />

32. Natural Marketing Institute, “<strong>2011</strong> U.S. LOHAS Custom <strong>Report</strong>, Abridged Presentation,” proprietary<br />

consumer research study findings presented to <strong>Dairy</strong> Management, Inc., Dec. 15, <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Animal Production and Health Division,<br />

“Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the <strong>Dairy</strong> Sector: A Life Cycle Assessment” (2010): 10.<br />

34. LCA studies follow ISO 14040:2006 and 14044:2006 standards.<br />

35. <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> U.S. <strong>Dairy</strong>, “Fluid Milk Carbon Footprint Study Frequently Asked Questions”<br />

(Aug. 16, 2010): 2.<br />

36. Ibid.<br />

37. Cheese results are preliminary estimates; final results are expected to be published in 2012.<br />

Average cheese calculations are based on the assumption that natural cheese can be represented<br />

as 65 percent cheddar and 35 percent mozzarella. Average cheese was reported as natural cheese<br />

in the <strong>2011</strong> U.S. <strong>Dairy</strong> <strong>Sustainability</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Executive Summary, which was published in March 2012.<br />

38. <strong>US</strong>DA NRCS staff email correspondence dated Nov. 14, <strong>2011</strong>, provided Environmental Quality<br />

Incentives Program funding data. <strong>US</strong>DA Conservation <strong>Innovation</strong> Grants program funding was<br />

determined from Strategic Conservation Services calculations.<br />

39. Results consolidate two data sources: audit data tracked in proprietary Farm Energy Audit Tool<br />

(FEAT) developed and managed by EnSave, Inc., and results by other audit program participants.<br />

40. <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> U.S. <strong>Dairy</strong>, “Oregon dairy finds ways to balance initial costs and long-term<br />

savings” (2009). Dollar savings are based on a reduction of 214,850 kWh of electricity use at a cost<br />

of $0.057 per kWh and a savings of 874 therms of natural gas at $1.248 per therm.<br />

41. U.S. EPA AgSTAR, “U.S. Farm Anaerobic Digestion Systems: A <strong>2011</strong> Snapshot” (2012): 1.<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!