07.11.2014 Views

CLARKE JH, Homoeopathy Explained - Classical Homeopathy Online

CLARKE JH, Homoeopathy Explained - Classical Homeopathy Online

CLARKE JH, Homoeopathy Explained - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

acute and chronic diseases, from paragraph 72 of his Organon :<br />

“The diseases to which man is liable are either rapid morbid processes of the abnormally<br />

deranged vital force, which have a tendency to finish their course more or less quickly,<br />

but always in a moderate time – these are termed acute diseases; or, they are diseases of<br />

such a character that, with small, often imperceptible beginnings, dynamically derange<br />

the living organism, each in its own peculiar manner, and cause it to deviate from the<br />

healthy condition in such a way that the automatic life energy, called vital force, whose<br />

office it is to preserve the health, only opposes to them, at the commencement and during<br />

their progress, imperfect, unsuitable, useless resistance, but is unable of itself to<br />

extinguish them, but must helplessly suffer (them to spread and) itself to be more and<br />

more abnormally deranged, until at length the organism is destroyed; these are termed<br />

chronic diseases. They are caused by infection from a chronic miasm.”<br />

By “miasm’ Hahnemann means an infectious principle, which when taken into the<br />

organism, may set up a specific disease. According to Hahnemann, there were not only<br />

miasms acute diseases, like the infectious principle of scarlatina, for example, but also of<br />

chronic diseases. Among the latter he recognised three – syphilis, sycosis and psora. The<br />

first is the lues venerea, which is recognised by all schools alike. The second is allied to<br />

this, but is distinguished by the production of characteristic warty growths. The third is a<br />

discovery of Hahnemann’s about which there has been the greatest misconception.<br />

Before giving an account of what Hahnemann meant by “psora”, I will give a familiar<br />

instance of a chronic miasm – the disease set up by vaccination. Vaccinia or “Cow-pox”,<br />

as the late Dr. Matthews Duncan pointed out, is extremely analogous to syphilis in many<br />

of its characters, and not the least in the appearance of secondary disorders after the<br />

primary illness is over. The course of the disease is well known. The virus having been<br />

introduced through an abrasion of the skin, in about a week inflammation occurs at the<br />

spot. Then there appears first a vesicle, then a pustule, then a scab, and finally a scar<br />

when the scab drops off. During the time that this series of events is occurring,<br />

constitutional symptoms manifest themselves, chiefly in the form of fever and undefined<br />

malaise. When the healing has taken place, there may be nothing more occur. The<br />

organism may have reacted perfectly and discharged the miasm. But this is not often the<br />

case. The diminished susceptibility to small-pox infection shows a change of a deep<br />

constitutional character. This constitutional change has been named “vaccinosis” by<br />

Burnett, and, as I can attest, is the parent of much chronic illness. Often skin eruptions<br />

occur, lasting for years, or various other kinds of ill-health, lasting, it may be, as long as<br />

life lasts, and not seldom shortening life. When such a series of disorders occurs, it is not<br />

(according to Hahnemann’s doctrine, though he did not use this illustration) a succession<br />

of new diseases, but different evolutions of one and the same disease, the “miasm” of<br />

vaccinia producing the chronic malady, vaccinosis.<br />

In the early years of his homoeopathic practice Hahnemann noticed that in certain cases<br />

the remedies he gave only produced temporary benefit. In these cases he found that the<br />

homoeopathicity of the remedies given was not complete. There was some factor in the<br />

case which had not been matched. It became apparent to him, then, that he had not only<br />

to take account of the malady from which the patients were then suffering, but also of<br />

previous and apparently different maladies. And he found that remedies which<br />

corresponded, in their action, to the whole course of the pathological life of a patient<br />

were needed for a cure; and through his provings he discovered what these deeply acting

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!