CLARKE JH, Homoeopathy Explained - Classical Homeopathy Online
CLARKE JH, Homoeopathy Explained - Classical Homeopathy Online
CLARKE JH, Homoeopathy Explained - Classical Homeopathy Online
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Discovering the Curative Powers of Drugs. In this he discusses the several ways in which<br />
drugs had formerly been studied and used, and then describes the “similar” method, the<br />
rule “likes by likes” (similia similibus) being first formulated in this essay thus :<br />
“Every powerful medicinal substance produces in the human body a peculiar kind of<br />
disease – the more powerful the medicine the more peculiar, marked, and violent the<br />
disease. We should imitate Nature, which sometimes cures a chronic disease by superadding<br />
another, and employ in the disease we wish to cure that medicine which is able to<br />
produce another very similar artificial disease, and the former will be cured, - similia<br />
similibus.”<br />
In this essay he referred to his early note on Cullen, and said after mature experience he<br />
could day that not only probably, but quite certainly, bark cured ague because it had the<br />
power to produce fever. He quotes examples of well-known drug actions to support his<br />
proposition, and sketched in a masterly way the characteristic features of a number of<br />
drugs.<br />
In 1805 – Hahnemann being no 50 years old – appeared two works of great importance :<br />
first, his Aesculapius in the Balance, which takes a general survey of traditional medicine<br />
and pronounces on it the verdict “weighed in the balances and found wanting” – a verdict<br />
which has since received very ample endorsement. Second, in two vols. in Latin, His<br />
Fragmenta de viribus medicamentorum positivis sive in sano corpore observatis<br />
(Fragments on the Positive Powers of Drugs, - that is to say, their effects observed in the<br />
healthy body). This contained the first effort towards the reconstruction of the Materia<br />
Medica on a rational basis of pure experiment on the healthy human body.<br />
In 1806 appeared his Medicine of Experience, in which is contained the first complete<br />
exposition of the homoeopathic method now thoroughly thought out by him after sixteen<br />
years of unremitting work – observation, experiment, and research. This was published in<br />
Hufeland’s Journal – that is to say, in the leading professional journal of this time. The<br />
same year Hahnemann published the last work he translated – Haller’s Materia Medica,<br />
Haller being one of Hahnemann’s forerunners in recommending the testing of drugs on<br />
the healthy body; but Haller did nothing towards carrying his recommendation into<br />
effect.<br />
In 1807 Hahnemann first used the word “Homoeopathic” in the title of a work – an<br />
article also contributed to Hufeland’s Journal – on “Indications of the Homoeopathic<br />
Employment of Medicines in Ordinary Practice;”<br />
The year 1810 may be said to be the birth-year of <strong>Homeopathy</strong>, for in that year appeared<br />
the first edition of the Organon, which is and expansion of the Medicine of Experience,<br />
and a complete statement of the Homoeopathic method. The publication of Hahnemann’s<br />
Organon marks an epoch in the history of therapeutics. It constitutes a complete,<br />
practical, and philosophical statement of the art of cure. It sets out clearly with the<br />
statement that the business of the physician is – not to “treat” but – to cure. “The<br />
physician’s high and only mission is to heal the sick – to cure, as it is termed” – this is the<br />
first aphorism of the Organon. Four other editions of the work followed the first; the fifth<br />
edition appearing in 1833. The year following the first appearance of the Organon –<br />
1811, that is, - saw the first part of the Materia Medica Pura, the third edition of which<br />
appeared in 1830.<br />
During these years of independent thought and action, as may easily be imagined,<br />
Hahnemann had no very easy time of it with his medical brethren, whose ideas he was