brochure 2012 - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientÃficas
brochure 2012 - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientÃficas
brochure 2012 - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientÃficas
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Research Unit<br />
Intellectual History of<br />
the Islamicate World<br />
Islam, Christianity and Judaism Interwined
Research Unit<br />
Intellectual History of<br />
the Islamicate World<br />
Vivantes International Medicine<br />
Medicine – Ma<strong>de</strong> in Germany<br />
Islam, Christianity and Judaism Interwined<br />
Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH is the biggest state-owned<br />
hospital chain in Germany. Located in Europe’s health capital Berlin,<br />
Vivantes owns 9 Hospitals und 14 nursing homes and treats 500.000<br />
patients p.a. (30% of all patients treated in Berlin). The hospital chain<br />
employs 13,500 members of staff, has 5000 beds and over 40 centres<br />
of excellence. In 2010 sales volume has been 850,000 EUR.<br />
To the international market Vivantes offers 4 products:<br />
1.) Patient Therapy Program: High quality treatment of foreign patients<br />
in Berlin (approx. 1500 patients p.a.) in over 100 medical <strong>de</strong>partments<br />
2.) Visiting Experts – Vivantes experts as guest lecturers and guest<br />
professors abroad<br />
3.) Education Program – Further education of foreign physicians at Vivantes<br />
4.) Consulting & Management in the healthcare sector through Vivantes<br />
International GmbH<br />
Vivantes<br />
Netzwerk für Gesundheit GmbH<br />
Vivantes International Medicine<br />
Am Nordgraben 2<br />
Berlin 13509<br />
Germany<br />
international@vivantes.<strong>de</strong><br />
Tel. +49 (0)30 130 12 1664/<br />
1668/ 1684/ 1685<br />
Fax +49 (0)30 130 12 1082<br />
Cooperation Consulting Our Facilities<br />
Head of Research Unit<br />
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sabine Schmidtke<br />
www.vivantes-international.com
Contents<br />
Message from the Presi<strong>de</strong>nt 7<br />
Mission and Vision 8<br />
The Team 8<br />
Staff 9<br />
Associated Team Members 10<br />
International and National Cooperations 12<br />
The work of the Research Unit Intellectual History of the Islamicate World and its research areas 14<br />
Executive Summary 14<br />
Detailed Description of the Research Areas and the Current Projects: 14<br />
Critical Avicennism in the Islamic East of the 12th century 14<br />
Muslim and Jewish philosophy intertwined during the 13th through 15th centuries 16<br />
Philosophy in Iran during the Ṣafavid and Qajar Periods 18<br />
Aesthetics 19<br />
The formative period of Mysticism 21<br />
Rationalism and Rational Theology in the Islamicate World 22<br />
Counterreactions 27<br />
The intellectual and religious heritage of Shīʿism (Zaydism and Imamism) 28<br />
Interreligious Controversies 30<br />
Bible in Arabic among Christians, Jews and Muslims 34<br />
Achievements (2003–<strong>2012</strong>) 35
Message from the Presi<strong>de</strong>nt<br />
Thank you for your interest in the Research Unit Intellectual History<br />
of the Islamicate World. One of Freie Universität’s prominent research<br />
centers, the Research Unit combines key features and strengths that<br />
have been <strong>de</strong>cisive for the success of Freie Universität in the recent years:<br />
a clear international orientation, a research program that cuts across traditional<br />
disciplinary boundaries and a commitment that reaches beyond<br />
the aca<strong>de</strong>mic world, true to the founding heritage of Freie Universität.<br />
The Research Unit acts as an umbrella structure for various research<br />
projects, all of which have been very successful in acquiring external<br />
funding, but its objective is not merely an organizational one. Rather, the<br />
overarching intellectual goal is to arrive at a better and more comprehensive<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the intellectual history of the Islamicate world,<br />
with particular attention to the medieval, pre-mo<strong>de</strong>rn and early mo<strong>de</strong>rn<br />
periods. The Research Unit employs a new perspective in the pursuit of<br />
this aim: rather than starting out from one of the traditional disciplines –<br />
Islamic Studies, Jewish Studies, Studies of Eastern Christianity – it relies<br />
on an interdisciplinary approach. With this orientation, it takes up - in<br />
many significant ways – a tradition that is at the same time a key object<br />
of its own research: The tradition of exchange between Muslim, Jewish<br />
and Christian scholars that existed in the Islamicate World for centuries.<br />
This intellectual history bears inspiring witness to a rational dialogue between<br />
the three monotheistic religions. An un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of Islam that<br />
sees this dialogue as an integral part of its historical heritage would in<strong>de</strong>ed<br />
be much more than merely an aca<strong>de</strong>mic matter.<br />
Reflecting the research profile of the Research Unit Intellectual History<br />
of the Islamicate World, its team unites scholars from various disciplines,<br />
countries and cultural backgrounds. The extensive international<br />
network, reaching from the Near East to Europe and North America,<br />
makes another vital contribution to its diversity in the aca<strong>de</strong>mic, cultural<br />
and methodolgical sense.<br />
I am convinced that the work of the Research Unit Intellectual History<br />
of the Islamicate World will continue to make groundbreaking<br />
contributions to aca<strong>de</strong>mic research and beyond. In closing, let me also<br />
thank all sponsors who have provi<strong>de</strong>d external funding for the work of<br />
the Research Unit. Needless to say, the work done would not have been<br />
possible without their support.<br />
Peter-André Alt<br />
Presi<strong>de</strong>nt of the Freie Universität Berlin<br />
7
Mission and Vision<br />
In a world in which bor<strong>de</strong>rs increase in significance – be they cultural or<br />
religious, political or economic–aca<strong>de</strong>mic research has the power to <strong>de</strong>monstrate<br />
that intellectual movements disregard any such bor<strong>de</strong>r and<br />
that symbiosis is the norm rather than the exception. This held true<br />
for intellectual movements in one of today’s hottest conflict areas, the<br />
Middle East, cradle of the three monotheistic religions and for more<br />
than two millenia home to major strands of human culture. If we<br />
wish to establish lasting peaceful relations between leading cultures, religions<br />
and political entities, we require above all knowledge about our<br />
own intellectual heritage, about that of others, and about the ways<br />
they intersect. Such knowledge will not only foster mutual respect,<br />
but it will also prevent the spread of i<strong>de</strong>ologically distorted perceptions of<br />
one another. An open mind in research, a readiness to wi<strong>de</strong>n the scope of<br />
scholarly investigation, and a willingness to share its results with a wi<strong>de</strong>r<br />
audience contribute significantly to the shaping of a public opinion<br />
that is less biased and more refined.<br />
Departing from the customary aca<strong>de</strong>mic approach with its (often<br />
exclusive) focus on either Muslim, Jewish or Christian authors and their<br />
writings, the Research Unit Intellectual History of the Islamicate<br />
World at Freie Universität Berlin (formally established in 2011 and exclusively<br />
fun<strong>de</strong>d through third-party funding) is unique in its threedimensional<br />
appreciation of the region’s intellectual history. With<br />
its specific approach it strives to contribute to a peaceful atmosphere<br />
between Muslims and non-Muslims both in the Muslim world and in<br />
the global context. Its members are committed to groundbreaking research<br />
in a variety of aspects of the intellectual history of the Islamicate<br />
world in the medieval, pre-mo<strong>de</strong>rn and early mo<strong>de</strong>rn periods. The results<br />
of their efforts are communicated not only to the scholarly community<br />
worldwi<strong>de</strong> but also to a wi<strong>de</strong>r public in East and West.<br />
The various activities and projects that are now un<strong>de</strong>r the umbrella<br />
of the Research Unit have been fun<strong>de</strong>d since 2003 by a variety of foundations<br />
and institutions, among them the German-Israeli Foundation<br />
(GIF) (2003–06), the Fritz Thyssen Foundation (2005–07, 2010–11), the<br />
Gerda Henkel Foundation (2005, 2006–07, 2008), the Rothschild Foundation<br />
(Yad ha-nadiv) (2006), the European Science Foundation (ESF)<br />
(2007), the European Research Council (ERC) (2008–13), the German<br />
Foreign Office (2009–11), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)<br />
with the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) (2010–13), and<br />
the Einstein Foundation (2010–15).<br />
The Team<br />
♦<br />
The team working at the Research Unit Intellectual History of the<br />
Islamicate World at Freie Universität Berlin not only studies the centuries-old<br />
intellectual symbiosis between Islam, Judaism and Christianity,<br />
it also reflects that symbiosis. The team is international and multireligious,<br />
with an almost equal number of Muslims and non-Muslims,<br />
comprising scholars from various Western countries and from the Middle<br />
East. While all are leading experts in several disciplines of Islamic Studies,<br />
some are also specialized in Christian and Jewish Arabic literature<br />
with proficiency in related languages such as Syriac and Aramaic,<br />
Coptic, Judaeo-Arabic, Hebrew and Persian. Close cooperation among<br />
the staff and the associated team members and an interdisciplinary approach<br />
characterize the work of the Research Unit.<br />
To achieve the maximum outreach within the scholarly community<br />
and the wi<strong>de</strong>r public, the team members publish regularly in a variety<br />
of languages – English, French, German, Arabic, Persian and Hebrew –<br />
on the internet,1 in peer-reviewed journals and in well-established<br />
book series, both in the West and in the Islamic world. Moreover, the<br />
director of the Research Unit is editor-in-chief of the journal Intellectual<br />
History of the Islamicate World, published by Brill, Lei<strong>de</strong>n, that has<br />
recently been launched.2 The Research Unit also publishes three book<br />
series in cooperation with leading aca<strong>de</strong>mic institutions in Iran.3 The aim<br />
is to publish critical editions of important, previously unedited texts and<br />
facsimile editions of particularly valuable manuscripts in the field of the<br />
intellectual history of the Islamicate world and Muslim history. Sixteen<br />
volumes have been published since 2006; another four volumes are currently<br />
in press. Research results and ongoing projects are regularly announced<br />
through the page of the Research Unit,4 its individual members’<br />
homepages and through the various social networks.5 In addition to<br />
publications for an aca<strong>de</strong>mic audience, the Research Unit is also addressing<br />
a wi<strong>de</strong>r audience, through a bi-annual Newsletter (in German),6 a<br />
monthly eNewsletter (English and German) and by organizing regularly<br />
public events aimed at the general public.<br />
Staff<br />
♦<br />
Dr. Hassan Ansari (Research Associate 2005–07, Senior Research Associate<br />
2009–13), PhD Paris 2009 (Ecole Pratique <strong>de</strong>s Hautes Etu<strong>de</strong>s)7<br />
Josephine Gehlhar (Stu<strong>de</strong>nt Assistant since 2009)<br />
Dr. Katja Maria Jung (coordinator of the Research Unit since <strong>2012</strong>), PhD<br />
1 E.g., http://ansari.kateban.com/.<br />
2 www.brill.com/ihiw.<br />
3 Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Mysticism. Facsimiles and Editions (since 2006, edited in<br />
cooperation with the Iranian Institute of Philosophy, Tehran); Classical Muslim Heritage Series<br />
(since 2011, edited in cooperation with Mīrāth-e maktūb, Tehran); Muslim History and Heritage<br />
Series (since 2011, edited in cooperation with Markaz-i Dā‘irat al-ma‘ārif-i buzurg-i islāmī, Teheran).<br />
4 http://www.geschkult.fu-berlin.<strong>de</strong>/e/islamwiss/institut/Intellectual_History_in_the_Islamicate_<br />
World/in<strong>de</strong>x.html.<br />
5 http://www.facebook.com/\#!/pages/Rediscovering-Theological-Rationalism-in-the-Medieval-<br />
World-of-Islam/144710522241165; http://www.facebook.com/pages/Research-Unit-Intellectual-<br />
History-of-the-Islamicate-World/120655678037693; http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/Departments/<br />
Research_Unit_Intellectual_History_of_the_Islamicate_World_Institut_f%C3%BCr_<br />
Islamwissenschaft<br />
6 Cf. http://www.geschkult.fu-berlin.<strong>de</strong>/e/islamwiss/Intellectual_History_in_the_Islamicate_World/<br />
Newsletter/in<strong>de</strong>x.html.<br />
7 http://ansari.kateban.com/.<br />
8 9
Munich 2010<br />
Dr. Lukas Muehlethaler (Senior Research Associate, 2009–13), PhD Yale<br />
20108<br />
Jonas Müller-Laackmann (Stu<strong>de</strong>nt Assistant since <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
Samir Mahmoud (Senior Research Associate since <strong>2012</strong>)<br />
Prof. Sabine Schmidtke (Founding Director of the Research unit), DPhil<br />
Oxford 1990, Professor at Freie Universität Berlin since 20029<br />
Gregor Schwarb (Research Associate 2005–07, Senior Research Associate<br />
2009–13), former Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Director of the Centre for the Study of<br />
Muslim-Jewish Relations, Cambridge10<br />
Dr. <strong>de</strong>s. Jan Thiele (Senior Research Associate, <strong>2012</strong>–13)11<br />
♦<br />
Associated Team Members<br />
Dr. Michael Ebstein (Rothschild Fellow), PhD The Hebrew University of<br />
Jerusalem 201112<br />
Dennis Halft OP, PhD candidate Institute of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität<br />
Berlin13<br />
Prof. Omar Hamdan, Professor of Qurʾānic Studies, Eberhard Karls-Universität<br />
Tübingen14<br />
Prof. Wilferd Ma<strong>de</strong>lung, Laudian Professor of Arabic (Emeritus), University<br />
of Oxford<br />
Damaris Pottek, PhD candidate Institute of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität<br />
Berlin15<br />
Dr. Reza Pourjavady, PhD Freie Universität Berlin 2008, currently Research<br />
Associate, McGill University, Montreal, Institute of Islamic Studies16<br />
Ahmad-Reza Rahimi-Riseh, PhD candidate Institute of Islamic Studies,<br />
Freie Universität Berlin17<br />
Dr. Abdurrahman al-Salimi, PhD Durham 2001 (Ministry of Endowments<br />
and Religious Affairs, Oman)<br />
Prof. A<strong>de</strong>l Y. Sidarus, Professor of Arabic and Islamic Studies (Emeritus),<br />
University of Evora, Portugal<br />
8 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/LukasMuehlethaler.<br />
9 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/SabineSchmidtke.<br />
10 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/GregorSchwarb.<br />
11 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/JanThiele.<br />
12 http://huji.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/MichaelEbstein<br />
13 http://www.institut-chenu.eu/in<strong>de</strong>x.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=146&Itemid=95.<br />
14 http://www.uni-tuebingen.<strong>de</strong>/einrichtungen/verwaltung-<strong>de</strong>zernate/i-forschung-strategie-undrecht/zentrum-fuer-islamische-theologie.html.<br />
15 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/TamarIs.<br />
16 http://mcgill.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/RezaPourjavady.<br />
17 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/AhmadRezaRahimiRiseh.<br />
10 11
Prof. Sarah Stroumsa, The Alice and Jack Ormut Professor of Arabic<br />
Studies, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, recipient of a Humboldt Research<br />
Award (2011/12)18<br />
Dr. Sophia Vasalou, PhD Cambridge 2006<br />
Dr. Ronny Vollandt, DPhil Cambridge (UK) 2011, IRHT, Section Hébraïque,<br />
CNRS Paris19<br />
Zeus Wellnhofer, PhD candidate Institute of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität<br />
Berlin20<br />
Eva-Maria Zeis, PhD candidate Institute of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität<br />
Berlin21<br />
International and National Cooperations<br />
♦<br />
The team members of the Research Unit Intellectual History of the<br />
Islamicate World have excellent working relations with a variety of aca<strong>de</strong>mic<br />
institutions and scholars in the Middle East, in Europe and the<br />
US. In Turkey, long-standing relations have been established with scholars<br />
working on related topics at Yıldız Technical University, Department<br />
of Humanities and Social Sciences (Prof. M. Sait Özervarli) and at ISAM<br />
Center for Islamic Studies and Marmara Unversity (Prof. Osman Gazi<br />
Özgü<strong>de</strong>nli, Dr. Harun Anay22), all in Istanbul, and at Uludağ Üniversitesi<br />
İlahiyat Fakültesi in Bursa (Dr. Kadir Gömbeyaz23, Dr. Veysel Kaya24).<br />
In Yemen, the team members are working in close cooperation with<br />
the Imām Zayd b. ʿAlī Cultural Foundation (IZbACF) / Muʾassasat al-<br />
Imām Zayd b. ʿAlī al-thaqāfiyya, Ṣanʿāʾ.25 In Iran, the Dāʾirat al-maʿārif-i<br />
buzurg-i islāmī26 and the Written Heritage Research Centre27, Tehran,<br />
should be mentioned. In Uzbekistan, the Research Unit is cooperating<br />
with the al-Biruni Institute of Oriental Studies of the Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences<br />
of Uzbekistan. Good working contacts with the King Faisal Centre<br />
for Research and Islamic Studies28 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and the<br />
Jumʿat al-Mājid Reseach Center in Dubai29 have been established over<br />
the past years. The Research Unit is also closely collaborating with the<br />
joint Israeli-Palestinian research project Intellectual encounters: Phi-<br />
losophy and Science in the World of Medieval Islam30 in Jerusalem/al-<br />
Quds, with Prof. Sara Sviri, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the<br />
Ben Zvi Institute in Jerusalem. At Tel Aviv University, the Research Unit<br />
is collaborating with Dr. Camilla Adang31 and Prof. Meira Polliack32 on a<br />
research project The Bible in Arabic among Jews, Christians and Muslims.<br />
The members of the Research Unit are also cooperating with the Institute<br />
of Samaritan Studies, Holon, Israel (Binyamin Tsedaka).<br />
In the West, the Research Unit is closely cooperating with the Institute of<br />
Islamic Studies at McGill University in Montreal where Prof. Robert Wisnovsky<br />
and Prof. Jamil Ragep have initiated “The Post-classical Islamic<br />
Philosophy Database Initiative” (PIPDI),33 with Prof. Alexan<strong>de</strong>r Treiger34<br />
of Dalhousie and his discussion group “Arabic Bible”, with Prof. Asad<br />
Q. Ahmed of Washington University in St. Louis, as well as Prof. Ahmet<br />
T. Karamustafa and Prof. Jon McGinnis of the University of Missouri,<br />
who coordinate the Mellon Sawyer Seminar “Graeco-Arabic Rationalism<br />
in Islamic Traditionalism: The Post-Classical Period (1200-1900 CE)”, with<br />
Prof. Mohammed Ali Amir-Moezzi,35 Ecole Pratique <strong>de</strong>s Hautes Etu<strong>de</strong>s,<br />
Paris, with Prof. Ayman Sheha<strong>de</strong>h, School of Oriental and African Studies,<br />
London, with Prof. Peter Adamson, King’s College, London, and<br />
Munich University, with Professor Ulrich Rudolph (Zürich) on the Ueberweg:<br />
Grundriss <strong>de</strong>r Geschichte <strong>de</strong>r Philosophie (Islamische Philosophie),<br />
with Prof. Maribel Fierro, <strong>Consejo</strong> <strong>Superior</strong> <strong>de</strong> <strong>Investigaciones</strong> Científicas,<br />
Madrid,36 with Prof. Khaled el-Rouayheb, Islamic Intellectual History,<br />
Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University,37 with<br />
Prof. David Hollenberg, University of Oregon,38 and Prof. Bernard Haykel<br />
and Dr. David Magier, Princeton University and Princeton University Library<br />
on “The Yemeni Manuscripts Digitization Initiative” (YMDI),39 and<br />
with Boris Zaykovsky, Russian National Library, St. Petersburg.<br />
Within Germany, the Research Unit is collaborating closely with the<br />
recently foun<strong>de</strong>d Center for Islamic Theology (Zentrum für Islamische<br />
Theologie), Tübingen, directed by Prof. Omar Hamdan, a former member<br />
of the Research Unit (2010–11).40 The Research Unit is also closely<br />
cooperating with the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin in a variety of research<br />
projects and conferences.41<br />
♦<br />
18 http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~stroums/.<br />
19 http://cnrs.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/RonnyVollandt<br />
20 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/ZeusWellnhofer.<br />
21 http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/EvaMariaZeis.<br />
22 http://www.isam.org.tr/; http://english.isam.org.tr/.<br />
23 http://uludag.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/KadirG\%C3\%B6mbeyaz.<br />
24 http://uludag.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/veyselkaya; http://ilahiyat.uludag.edu.tr/tr/aka<strong>de</strong>mikkadro/<br />
kadro/408-veysel-kaya.html.<br />
25 http://www.izbacf.org/.<br />
26 http://www.cgie.org.ir/.<br />
27 http://www.mirasmaktoob.ir/.<br />
28 http://www.kfcris.com/.<br />
29 http://www.almajidcenter.org/Arabic/Pages/<strong>de</strong>fault.aspx/.<br />
30 http://www.intellectualencounters.org/.<br />
31 http://telaviv.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/CamillaAdang; http://vimeo.com/38437580.<br />
32 http://www.tau.ac.il/humanities/vip/polliackm.htm.<br />
33 http://islamsci.mcgill.ca/RASI/pipdi.html.<br />
34 http://religiousstudies.dal.ca/Faculty%20and%20staff/Alexan<strong>de</strong>r_Treiger.php.<br />
35 http://www.ephe.sorbonne.fr/annuaire-<strong>de</strong>-la-recherche/mamirmoezzi.html.<br />
36 http://csic.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/maribelfierro.<br />
37 http://tinyurl.com/nelc-fas-harvard-edu-rouayheb.<br />
38 http://ymdi.uoregon.edu/.<br />
39 http://ymdi.uoregon.edu/.<br />
40 http://www.uni-tuebingen.<strong>de</strong>/einrichtungen/verwaltung-<strong>de</strong>zernate/i-forschung-strategie-undrecht/zentrum-fuer-islamische-theologie.html.<br />
41 See, e.g., http://staatsbibliothek-berlin.<strong>de</strong>/nc/die-staatsbibliothek/ausstellungen-undveranstaltungen/<strong>de</strong>tail/article/<strong>2012</strong>-01-12-5714/.<br />
12 13
The work of the Research Unit Intellectual History of<br />
the Islamicate World and its research areas<br />
Executive Summary<br />
Intellectual richness and unparalleled variety characterize the Islamicate<br />
world throughout its history and a fundamental un<strong>de</strong>rstanding<br />
of the intellectual history of the Islamic cultural sphere is possible<br />
only if research is not confined within <strong>de</strong>nominational boundaries. The<br />
Qurʾān regards itself as the last, perfect link in a chain of progressive<br />
divine revelations. It is, thus, very much aware of its own generic<br />
linkage to the two preceding monotheistic religions, Judaism and Christianity.<br />
The early Muslims adopted many Jewish and Christian elements<br />
as they had evolved during Late Antiquity. Christians and Jews were<br />
also involved in shaping Muslim intellectual history in subsequent<br />
centuries. From the 9th century CE Muslims, Christians and Jews shared<br />
a common everyday and cultural language, Arabic, which they used<br />
to communicate i<strong>de</strong>as, concepts and texts, and the ensuing exchange was<br />
mutually enriching. For centuries representatives of all three religions<br />
read a very similar canon, especially in the so-called rational sciences<br />
(theology, philosophy, aspects of legal methodology, the natural sciences,<br />
and medicine) and belles lettres and thus contributed to its <strong>de</strong>velopment.<br />
The dynamic was multi-dimensional. Christian and Jewish authors influenced<br />
Islamic thought, while the writings of Muslim thinkers had an<br />
impact on non-Muslims. Interreligious interaction is a historical fact<br />
that continues into the mo<strong>de</strong>rn age.<br />
While this has been amply <strong>de</strong>monstrated for some selected periods and<br />
regions, scholars usually opt for a one-dimensional approach with an (often<br />
exclusive) focus on either Muslim, Jewish or Christian authors and<br />
their writings. In all three fields and for a variety of reasons, the scholarly<br />
investigation of the “rational sciences” beyond <strong>de</strong>nominational bor<strong>de</strong>rs is<br />
still in the beginning phase. This calls for an entirely new framework<br />
for innovative research that systematically crosses the boundaries<br />
between three major disciplines of aca<strong>de</strong>mia and research, viz. Islamic<br />
Studies, Jewish Studies and the study of Eastern Christianity.<br />
This approach characterizes the work carried out at the Research Unit<br />
Intellectual History of the Islamicate World.<br />
♦<br />
Detailed Description of the Research Areas and the Current<br />
Projects:<br />
Critical Avicennism in the Islamic East of the 12th century<br />
The reception of the philosophy of Avicenna (d. 1037) in the Islamic and<br />
Christian West has been documented for some time. Less un<strong>de</strong>rstood is<br />
the reception of Avicenna’s philosophy in the East of the Islamic<br />
world, where it occurred on a much greater scale and proved much more<br />
momentous. Two hundred years after the <strong>de</strong>ath of Avicenna, major con-<br />
14
cepts of his philosophy had become an integral part of new philosophical<br />
schools and traditional disciplines.<br />
Yet only rarely was Avicenna’s philosophical system accepted wholesale.<br />
Especially during the 12th century, various thinkers interpreted and reevaluated<br />
his works from a number of perspectives. While they generally<br />
retained Avicenna’s conceptual framework, they modified or relinquished<br />
some of his most central tenets. They did so for various reasons. Some<br />
attempted to resolve problems inherent to the Avicennan system. Others<br />
tried to integrate Avicennan i<strong>de</strong>as into hitherto nonphilosophical contexts.<br />
This process and the philosophical concepts and positions resulting<br />
from this process will be termed “critical Avicennism”.<br />
To better un<strong>de</strong>rstand the formation of critical Avicennism, members of the<br />
Research Unit study figures and writings from the 12th century that<br />
are central to this process. They aim to draw the intellectual landscape of<br />
that period, to make important texts accessible, and to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the<br />
<strong>de</strong>velopments of central philosophical concepts in <strong>de</strong>tail.<br />
The works of the famous 12th-century logician and philosopher ʿUmar<br />
b. Sahlān al-Sāwī in <strong>de</strong>fense of Avicennan philosophy (Lukas Muehlethaler<br />
/ Reza Pourjavady) illustrate the reaction to critical Avicennism<br />
and the modification of Avicennan tenets in its wake. Two philosophical<br />
works of ʿUmar b. Sahlān, his Nahj al-taqdīs and his response to criticisms<br />
of Avicennan philosophy, are being critically edited and ma<strong>de</strong> accessible<br />
through translation and analysis. In these works, ʿUmar b. Sahlān <strong>de</strong>fends<br />
central Avicennan concepts against critiques by al-Shahrastānī (d. 1153)<br />
and Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī (d. after 1164-5). The monograph, Defending<br />
Avicennan Philosophy: ʿUmar b. Sahlān al-Sāwī in Response to the Criticisms<br />
of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī and Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm al-<br />
Shahrastānī, will be ready for the press in 2013.<br />
A study of Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s philosophical work and its<br />
reception (Lukas Muehlethaler) looks at how key concepts in Avicenna’s<br />
philosophy are transformed by Abū l-Barakāt and how the<br />
transformed concepts are taken up by Abū l-Barakāt’s contemporaries<br />
and later thinkers. Chief among them is Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī (d. 1210)<br />
whose conceptualization of philosophical positions is of central importance<br />
for 13th-century Arabic philosophy and theology. Fakhr al-Dīn’s<br />
reception and transformation of the Avicennan tradition in general and<br />
Abū l-Barakāt’s philosophy in particular are therefore traced through a<br />
number of case studies.<br />
♦<br />
Muslim and Jewish philosophy intertwined during the 13th through<br />
15th centuries<br />
Apart from the towering figure of Abū l-Barakāt, the Jewish philosopher<br />
and convert to Islam of the 12th century, there are many additional examples<br />
of Jewish and Muslim thinkers who were well-versed in both religious<br />
traditions and who left an impact on Jewish and Muslim rea<strong>de</strong>rs<br />
alike. One of the most prominent Jewish philosophers belonging to this<br />
category is ʿIzz al-Dīn Ibn Kammūna. Ibn Kammūna was born into<br />
a Jewish family of 13th century Baghdad and received a thorough<br />
education in both Jewish and Islamic letters. Little is known about<br />
his life but it is evi<strong>de</strong>nt that he held a high-ranking position in the administration<br />
of the Ilkhānid empire, although there is no indication that<br />
he ever converted to Islam. Like many Muslim scholars of his time, he<br />
enjoyed the patronage of the Minister of State, Shams al-Dīn al-Juwaynī<br />
(d. 1284) and his family, to whom he <strong>de</strong>dicated most of his works. He<br />
also correspon<strong>de</strong>d with the most important intellectuals of his time. Ibn<br />
Kammūna’s philosophical writings and particularly his commentary<br />
on the Kitāb al-Talwīḥāt by Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī, as well as his<br />
in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt works in this discipline significantly shaped the <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />
of Islamic philosophy in the Eastern lands of Islam over<br />
the following centuries. The Research Unit (Sabine Schmidtke / Reza<br />
Pourjavady) is currently preparing critical editions of Ibn Kammūna’s<br />
commentary on Avicenna’s Remarks and admonitions (al-Ishārāt wal-tanbīhāt)<br />
(editio princeps) and of his Examination of the three religions<br />
(Tanqīḥ al-abḥāth li-l-milal al-thalāth). A monograph on Ibn Kammūna’s<br />
theory of the soul (Lukas Muehlethaler) is about to go to press.<br />
The vast holdings of manuscript collections of Jewish provenance (esp.<br />
the Abraham Firkovitch collection in St. Petersburg) in many respects<br />
still await scholarly exploration and the material they contain specifically<br />
for the later period (12th through 15th centuries and beyond) is bound to<br />
change our current perception of Jewish philosophy in the lands of Islam<br />
and its intertwinedness with the Muslim environment significantly as research<br />
progresses. Sabine Schmidtke is engaged with the literary output<br />
of the intriguing figure of David ben Joshua Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s (d. 1415), the<br />
last head of the Jewish community of Egypt from the <strong>de</strong>scendants of Moses<br />
Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s. In contrast to Ibn Kammūna’s, his professional life took<br />
place within the confines of the Jewish community(ies) and his works (all<br />
written in Arabic, but in Hebrew characters) circulated exclusively among<br />
Jewish rea<strong>de</strong>rs. Born in Egypt, David succee<strong>de</strong>d his father Joshua Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s<br />
as nagīd or Head of the Community following the latter’s <strong>de</strong>ath<br />
in 1355. For reasons that remain unclear, he left his homeland to take up<br />
resi<strong>de</strong>nce in Syria for a <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong> during the 1370s and 1380s. He resumed<br />
his office as head of the community after his return to Egypt and retained<br />
it until his <strong>de</strong>ath. Apart from being a prolific author himself, David is<br />
well known as a book collector and an accomplished scribe, and numerous<br />
copies of works in his hand by earlier Jewish and Muslim authors in<br />
a variety of disciplines have survived. It was particularly during his time<br />
in Aleppo that David assembled an impressive library containing numerous<br />
copies of works that he had either commissioned or copied himself.<br />
These testify to his scholarly abilities and his erudition in both the Jewish<br />
and Muslim literary traditions. He wrote a commentary on Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s’<br />
Mishneh Torah, an influential co<strong>de</strong> of Jewish law, as well as<br />
numerous works in the fields of ethics, philosophy, logic as well as a comprehensive<br />
handbook of Sufi mysticism. These works testify to David’s<br />
<strong>de</strong>ep immersion into a variety of Muslim rational sciences. In philosophy,<br />
he was not only familiar with the peripatetic thought of Avicenna, but<br />
also acquainted with numerous writings of the foun<strong>de</strong>r of Illuminationist<br />
philosophy, Shihāb al-Dīn al-Suhrawardī, and he may have possessed<br />
a copy of Ibn Kammūna’s commentary on Suhrawardī’s K. al-Talwīḥāt.<br />
David was likewise familiar with the writings of the renowned Muslim<br />
thinker Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazzālī (d. 1111) and of the latter’s stu<strong>de</strong>nt Fakhr<br />
al-Dīn al-Rāzī. In addition, he quotes extensively from the earlier Muslim<br />
literature on mysticism, and was evi<strong>de</strong>ntly well-versed in the Muslim as-<br />
16 17
tronomical tradition.<br />
Although none of the works of David ben Joshua ever reached a wi<strong>de</strong>r<br />
Muslim rea<strong>de</strong>rship, as was the case with the writings of his co-religionist<br />
Ibn Kammūna, he did reach out on a more personal level. During his<br />
time in Syria, David befrien<strong>de</strong>d the Muslim scholar ʿAlī b. Ṭaybughā<br />
al-Ḥalabī al-Ḥanafī al-Muwaqqit (d. 1391?), who wrote a commentary<br />
on Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s’ Mishneh Torah (Book of Knowledge, Fundamental<br />
precepts of the Torah I–IV) based on an Arabic translation by David ben<br />
Joshua and the latter’s own commentary. Both commentaries are extant<br />
in manuscript and provi<strong>de</strong> evi<strong>de</strong>nce for a fruitful and stimulating exchange<br />
between two distinguished scholars of the 15th century, a Jew and<br />
a Muslim, on the fundamental issues of a Jewish Co<strong>de</strong> of Law. These commentaries<br />
are being closely studied and will be edited by Gregor Schwarb.<br />
Philosophy in Iran during the Ṣafavid and Qajar Periods<br />
♦<br />
During the Ṣafavid period (1502–1736), Iranian philosophy was characterized<br />
by two main strands, one following the thought of Ṣadr al-Dīn al-<br />
Shīrāzī (“Mullā Ṣadrā”, d. 1640), the other strand following that of Rajab<br />
ʿAlī al-Tabrīzī (d. 1669). While much scholarly attention has been paid<br />
over the last <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s to the renowned Mullā Ṣadrā, Rajab ʿAlī al-Tabrīzī<br />
and his exten<strong>de</strong>d circle of stu<strong>de</strong>nts has so far mostly escaped scholars’<br />
attention. One of the projects of the Research Unit (Ahmad Reza Rahimi<br />
Riseh) is therefore concerned with his philosophical œuvre and its reception.<br />
Five of his works have been preserved in manuscript. In addition to<br />
this, the writings of his numerous stu<strong>de</strong>nts are another major source for<br />
the reconstruction of his thought. The most important of his stu<strong>de</strong>nts are<br />
Muḥammad Rafīʿ Pīrzā<strong>de</strong>h (d. first half 18th c.), ʿAlī Qulī Qaračaġāy Khān<br />
(d. after 1680), Qawām al-Dīn Muḥammad al-Rāzī (d. 1683), Mullā Ḥasan<br />
al-Lunbānī (d. 1683), Mullā ʿAbbās al-Mulawī (d. after 1690), Muḥammad<br />
b. Mufīd (“Qāḍī Saʿīd al-Qummī”, d. 1695), Muḥammad Ismāʿīl b.<br />
Muḥammad Bāqir al-Khwātūnābādī (d. 1704) and Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-<br />
Fattāḥ al-Tunkābunī (“Fāḍil-i Sarāb”, d. 1712). The project aims at reconstructing<br />
Rajab ʿAlī al-Tabrīzī’s biography, providing a <strong>de</strong>tailed inventory<br />
of his writings with <strong>de</strong>scriptions of all preserved manuscripts, a study of<br />
his stu<strong>de</strong>nts and their writings, as well as an analysis of his philosophical<br />
thought in comparison with that of his contemporary Mullā Ṣadrā.<br />
Next to nothing is known in mo<strong>de</strong>rn scholarship about the rich philosophical<br />
tradition in Iran during the Qajar period. One of the current<br />
projects of the Research Unit (Reza Pourjavady / Sabine Schmidtke)<br />
is therefore to edit a collective volume <strong>de</strong>voted to this period, The Philosophical<br />
Tradition in Iran during the Qajar Period (1794–1925). Each chapter<br />
will treat one key thinker of the period and will be written by a leading<br />
Western or Iranian experts in the field: Chapter One: Shaykh Aḥmad<br />
al-Aḥsāʾī (by Hassan Ansari); Chapter Two: Mullā Muḥammad Mahdī<br />
Narāqī (by Reza Pourjavady); Chapter Three: Mullā ʿAlī Nūrī (by Sajjad<br />
Rizvi); Chapter Four: Mullā Hādī Sabzavārī (by Fatemah Fana); Chapter<br />
Five: Āqā ʿAlī Mudarris Zunūzī (by Mohsen Kadivar); Chapter Six: Mīrzā<br />
Abū l-Ḥasan Jilva (by Encieh Barkhah); Chapter Six: Lithograph Editions<br />
of Philosophical and Theological Works in Qajar Iran (by Reza Pourjavady<br />
/ Sabine Schmidtke). The publication of the volume is envisaged for 2013.<br />
One of the characteristic features of this period is the increased interest<br />
in ancient Greek philosophical texts and pre-Avicennan philosophical<br />
writings. The intellectual en<strong>de</strong>avour in an attempt to shed light<br />
on the legacy of Greek philosophy can be traced back to the end of the<br />
15th century to Shiraz which was at the time the main cultural centre<br />
of philosophy in the Eastern lands of Islam. Here, the two main figures<br />
who initiated the Eastern renaissance movement were Jalāl al-Dīn al-<br />
Dawānī (d. 1502) and Ghiyāth al-Dīn al-Dashtakī (d. 1541-42). Gradually,<br />
a large corpus of Graeco-Arabica (including pseudo-Graeco Arabica)<br />
was assembled by scholars, one of the most significant texts being the socalled<br />
Theologia Aristotelis, an adapted paraphrase of sections of Enneads<br />
IV to VI of Plotinus, which had ma<strong>de</strong> an immense impact in Christian,<br />
Muslim and Jewish circles during the 16th and 17th centuries. In a<br />
joint project, Reza Pourjavady and Sabine Schmidtke study this shift and<br />
its consequences in the Muslim philosophical writings of the 16th, 17th,<br />
and 18th centuries. With the help of an archive containing digitized copies<br />
of all the relevant manuscripts produced from the early 16th to late<br />
18th centuries and a database with an analytical <strong>de</strong>scription of the extant<br />
manuscripts they are examining the corpus of Greek and pre-Avicennan<br />
Muslim philosophical works that was copied/read during this<br />
period. Moreover, Muslim philosophical works written in this period are<br />
being examined in or<strong>de</strong>r to study the appropriation of the Graeco-<br />
Arabica by the Muslim philosophers of the period un<strong>de</strong>r investigation.<br />
Aesthetics<br />
♦<br />
In addition to the rigorous philosophical inquiries into post-Avicennan<br />
philosophy and intellectual history, there are projects that are more thematic<br />
such as the topic of aesthetics (Samir Mahmoud). Despite the<br />
existence of numerous studies of Islamic art and architecture, there is a<br />
<strong>de</strong>arth of scholarship in what precisely links these works to the overall<br />
intellectual and cultural climate of their time, particularly its aesthetic<br />
sensibilities. What complicates the matter is the conspicuous absence<br />
of an Arabic equivalent to the word ‘aesthetics’. The lack of terminology,<br />
however, does not mean that the themes and correlata suggested<br />
by the term ‘aesthetics’ were not discussed in medieval Islamic<br />
thought. Muslims not only enjoyed beauty but promoted the arts.<br />
The precise nature of this relationship between art and beauty <strong>de</strong>pends<br />
on the author, period, and school of thought un<strong>de</strong>r consi<strong>de</strong>ration.<br />
Regardless of the different approaches to beauty, one can safely say that<br />
medieval Muslim philosophers, theologians, and mystics always<br />
discussed aesthetics in the context of their discussions on metaphysics,<br />
theology, or ethics and not as a sui generis topic in any mo<strong>de</strong>rn<br />
sense. The task of exploring such a wi<strong>de</strong> range of source is an onerous<br />
one that requires the patient scholar to search in many different places.<br />
He has to turn to the philosophical works that address questions of<br />
intelligible beauty and the nature of sensible beauty inherited from the<br />
Greek texts; mystical works that discuss the beauty of the world as instances<br />
or manifestations of Divine Beauty; theological discussions on<br />
18 19
the signs of God in nature, discussions about the divine attributes such as<br />
we find in the kalām disputes of the Muʿtazilites and Ashʿarites; ethical,<br />
moral, and jurispru<strong>de</strong>ntial treatises that warn of the dangers of sensuous<br />
pleasure; literary discussions of aesthetics in poetry; discussions<br />
of vision and how the perception of an object affects the perceiver such<br />
as we find in the field of optics; various Sufi writings on the nature of<br />
perception and matter; alchemy and how one thing can be ma<strong>de</strong> to appear<br />
as another; psychology, particularly writings on dreams and the<br />
imagination; and ‘licit magic,’ i.e. treatises that often discuss the allure<br />
and magical power of poetry, geometrically <strong>de</strong>signed talismans, and images<br />
or what is referred to as apotropaic. In the above-mentioned sources<br />
there are either direct references to the correlata of aesthetics or else<br />
indirect and implicit assumptions about their nature vis-à-vis their relationship<br />
to the entire metaphysical, philosophical, theological, mystical,<br />
scientific, or ethical framework within which they are discussed. It<br />
is more accurate, then, to speak of the existence of a multiplicity of aesthetic<br />
sensibilities. The focus on Ibn ʿArabī (d. 638/1240) in this research<br />
project stems from the importance of Ibn ʿArabī and his legacy in<br />
post-Avicennan Islamic intellectual history. In regards to the relevance<br />
of Ibn ʿArabī to aesthetics, his theory of ‘the imagination’ and<br />
‘liminal images’ as intermediaries between different realms of meaning<br />
that both reveal and conceal in an ambiguous manner have a lot to offer<br />
a theory of art as mediation and the nature of re-presentation and<br />
mimesis. His theory on how the imagination works can significantly<br />
enrich contemporary un<strong>de</strong>rstandings of the relation between geometric<br />
signification and imaginative programs suggested by the geometric art<br />
and the nature of the creative process. His un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of sympathy<br />
and ornament as animated can contribute to the art historical and<br />
anthropological <strong>de</strong>bate surrounding the significance of ornament. He also<br />
offers a brilliant psychological analysis of ‘images’ and the imaging<br />
process, why certain traditions have figurative representation. Moreover,<br />
his is the first lucid and internally coherent account of the ban on figuration<br />
in the Islamic tradition. He presents a fresh and renewed appreciation<br />
for the meaning of ‘the abstract’ and ‘the geometric,’ their relation to<br />
‘representational images,’ and their fundamental role in art and religion.<br />
His theory of love as that which is occasioned by beauty can as much<br />
explain the erotic gaze and offer a theory of the beautiful as the daemon<br />
in Plato’s Symposium, and his theory of language and writing as a<br />
distinct mo<strong>de</strong> of being remains to be explored from an aesthetic point of<br />
view. The continuity of many of these themes throughout his commentators<br />
and the possible influence it may have had on the <strong>de</strong>velopment of<br />
the arts in the Ottoman and Safavid lands has yet to be explored. There is<br />
yet another significance to Ibn ʿArabī that is more contemporary. The rise<br />
to prominence of abstract art in the 20th century poses an interesting<br />
path of inquiry regards to Islamic art in general and Ibn Arabī’s<br />
thought in particular. If one follows Alois Riegl’s notion of a Kunstwollen,<br />
one can bridge the temporal divi<strong>de</strong> between medieval abstract and<br />
geometric Islamic art and 20th century ornament and art through<br />
a serious intellectual <strong>de</strong>bate. This has already started in the pioneering<br />
scholarship of Islamic art historians such as Oleg Grabar, Gulru Necipoglu,<br />
and Valerie Gonzalez. The project will thus bring Islamic studies,<br />
Western aesthetics and art history, and anthropology into dialogue.<br />
In addition, it will offer, in lieu of Hans Belting’s latest book, Florence and<br />
Baghdad: Renaissance Art and Arab Science, a renewed appreciation for a<br />
distinct Islamic aesthetic sensibility not governed or evaluated on Western<br />
art historical terms.<br />
The formative period of Mysticism<br />
♦<br />
Together with Sara Sviri (Jerusalem), the Research Unit (Sabine Schmidtke)<br />
recently launched a new project aiming to explore aspects and trends<br />
of Islamic mysticism in its formative period and revisiting processes,<br />
themes, images, practices, terminology and thought mo<strong>de</strong>ls pertaining<br />
to the literary products of the 9th–11th centuries, which <strong>de</strong>marcates the<br />
formative period of Islamic mysticism. Un<strong>de</strong>rlying this approach is the<br />
contention that within Islamic studies a typological and comparative approach<br />
to the origins of Islamic mysticism is a <strong>de</strong>si<strong>de</strong>ratum. The literary<br />
corpora pertaining to this period, Sufi and non-Sufi alike, contain materials<br />
which may shed new light on the versatility and fluidity of the<br />
prevailing mystical trends during this early period. Thus, although issues<br />
pertaining to Sufism will remain central to this research, other, non-Sufi,<br />
mystical mo<strong>de</strong>ls and trends are being explored whose portrayal, in both<br />
the original compilatory and hagiographic literature as well as in mo<strong>de</strong>rn<br />
scholarship, has hitherto been marginalized. The aim is to address<br />
such oversights and to offer a more complete picture of the topic un<strong>de</strong>r<br />
discussion by exploring a wi<strong>de</strong> range of textual sources – some published<br />
and many still in manuscript – by pursuing rigorous text-based philology<br />
together with historical, prosopographic and comparative-thematic<br />
methodologies. The project proceeds along three main axes, first the continuum<br />
of Late Antique trends, motifs, topoi and practices; secondly<br />
the build-up of Sufi culture from local centres to an all-inclusive<br />
movement; thirdly philosophical mysticism and theological trends.<br />
Within this field, the Research Unit (Hassan Ansari / Sabine Schmidtke)<br />
is collecting, sorting out and analyzing hitherto unconsulted material relating<br />
to the Sufi-Ashʿarite connection in Nishapur – notably some of the<br />
works of Abū Saʿd al-Khargūshī (d. 1015-16) that were believed to be<br />
lost – Khargūshī being marginalized in current Sufi studies but whose<br />
importance as a witness to early processes and <strong>de</strong>finitions has been duly<br />
highlighted by Sara Sviri. Moreover, together with Sara Sviri the Research<br />
Unit also explores the engagements with Sufism of other theological<br />
schools active in Nishapur and Khurasan such as the Karrāmiyya and<br />
the Ḥanafiyya. Studies in the background of Christian (Syriac) monasticism<br />
and “ascetism” will eventually also be consi<strong>de</strong>red.<br />
Rationalism and Rational Theology in the Islamicate World<br />
♦<br />
Rationalism has been a salient feature of Muslim theological thought<br />
from the earliest times. Despite the fact that rationalism had its opponents<br />
throughout Islamic history, it continued to be one of the mainstays<br />
of Muslim theological (and legal) thought, and it is only in the wake of<br />
mo<strong>de</strong>rn Islamic fundamentalism that rationalism has become marginal-<br />
20 21
ized and threatened as never before.<br />
The disputed issue of authenticity notwithstanding, a small corpus of<br />
texts is extant in which doctrinal issues such as free will versus <strong>de</strong>terminism<br />
are <strong>de</strong>alt with in a dilemmatic dialogue pattern. The display of<br />
the dialectical technique in these texts testifies to the use of reason in<br />
the formulation of and argumentation for doctrinal issues from a very<br />
early period onwards. There is a near-consensus among contemporary<br />
scholars that the Muslim dialectical technique of kalām can be traced<br />
back to similar patterns of dilemmatic dialogue that were characteristic<br />
for the Christological controversies raging in 6th century Alexandria<br />
and, more importantly, 7th century Syria. These are based on late antique<br />
(“pagan”) schools of rhetorics.<br />
The Muʿtazila was the earliest “school” of rationalist Islamic theology<br />
and one of the most important and influential currents of Islamic<br />
thought. Muʿtazilites stressed the primacy of reason and free will and <strong>de</strong>veloped<br />
an epistemology, ontology and psychology that provi<strong>de</strong>d a basis<br />
for explaining the nature of the world, God, man and the phenomena of<br />
religion. In their ethics, Muʿtazilites maintained that good and evil can be<br />
known solely through human reason. The Muʿtazila had its beginnings in<br />
the 8th century and its classical period of <strong>de</strong>velopment was from the latter<br />
part of the 9th until the middle of the 11th century. The movement gradually<br />
fell out of favour in Sunni Islam and had largely disappeared by the<br />
14th century. Its impact, however, continued to be felt in Shīʿī Islam where<br />
its influence subsisted through the centuries. Moreover, mo<strong>de</strong>rn research<br />
on the Muʿtazila from the beginning of the 20th century onwards gave<br />
rise to a renaissance of the Muʿtazilite notion of rationalism finding its<br />
expression in the so-called “Neo-Muʿtazila”.<br />
Within the field of Islamic Studies, scientific research of Muslim rational<br />
theology is a comparatively young discipline, as a critical mass<br />
of primary sources became accessible only at a relatively late stage.<br />
Muʿtazilite works were not wi<strong>de</strong>ly copied and few manuscripts have survived.<br />
So little authentic Muʿtazilite literature was available that until the<br />
discovery of a significant number of Muʿtazilite texts in the early 1950’s<br />
in Yemen, Muʿtazilite doctrine was mostly known through the works of<br />
its opponents.<br />
Second in importance in the use of rationalism was the theological movement<br />
of the so-called Ashʿariyya, named thus after its eponymous<br />
foun<strong>de</strong>r, Abū l-Ḥasan al-Ashʿarī (d. 935). Ashʿarī and his followers aimed<br />
at formulating a via media between the two dominant opposing strands<br />
of the time, Muʿtazilism and traditionalist Islam. Methodologically, they<br />
applied rationalism in their theological thought as was characteristic for<br />
the Muʿtazila while still maintaining the primacy of revelation over that<br />
of reason. Doctrinally, they upheld the notion of ethical subjectivism<br />
as against the ethical objectivism of the Muʿtazila. On this basis, they<br />
<strong>de</strong>veloped their own theological doctrines. Within the Sunni realm at<br />
least, Ashʿarism proved more successful and enjoyed a longer life than<br />
Muʿtazilism, yet, like Muʿtazilism, Ashʿarism was constantly challenged<br />
by traditionalist opponents rejecting any kind of rationalism.<br />
While mo<strong>de</strong>rn research on the Muʿtazila has begun relatively late, research<br />
on Ashʿarism started already in the 19th century, due to the fact<br />
that more manuscripts of Ashʿarite texts are preserved in European libraries<br />
than Muʿtazilite ones. Major landmarks in the 20th century were<br />
22 23
the publications of R. J. McCarthy in 1953 and 1957. Additional advances<br />
in recent <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s were ma<strong>de</strong> by the numerous studies of M. Allard, R.<br />
M. Frank and D. Gimaret. In addition to the efforts by Western scholars,<br />
many scholars in the Islamic world have also contributed significantly<br />
to the research of this movement. This progress notwithstanding, many<br />
<strong>de</strong>si<strong>de</strong>rata remain in the scholarly investigation of the Ashʿariyya,<br />
particularly with respect to the earlier phase of the movement. Among the<br />
most spectacular findings by a member of the Research Unit were two so<br />
far completely unknown manuscripts of the opus magnum by the important<br />
Ashʿarite theologian Abū Bakr al-Bāqillānī, Hidāyat al-mustarshidīn<br />
in Russia and Uzbekistan.<br />
The various strands of rational Muslim theological thought within<br />
Islam are closely related to each other as they were shaped and reshaped<br />
in a continuous process of close interaction between its respective<br />
representatives. This also holds true for other theological schools<br />
that were less prominent in the central areas of the Islamic world, such as<br />
the Māturīdiyya (named thus after its eponym Abū Manṣūr al-Māturīdī,<br />
d. 944) which was heavily in<strong>de</strong>bted to traditional Ḥanafite positions and<br />
to Muʿtazilite thought alike, but whose centre was in the North-East of<br />
Iran so that it has ma<strong>de</strong> relatively little impact. Of consi<strong>de</strong>rable importance<br />
is also the Ibāḍiyya, which reacted in many ways to Muʿtazilism<br />
(Wilferd Ma<strong>de</strong>lung / Abdurrahman al-Salimi).<br />
What has been stated about the close interaction between the various<br />
strands of thought within Islam equally applies to the relations of Islam<br />
with other religions that were most prominently represented in the medieval<br />
world of Islam, viz. Judaism and Christianity. Here, similar phenomena<br />
of reciprocity can be observed. Jews, Christians, and Muslims<br />
had Arabic as their common language and therefore naturally shared<br />
a similar cultural background. Often reading the same books and all<br />
speaking and writing in the same language, they created a unique intellectual<br />
commonality in which an ongoing, constant exchange of i<strong>de</strong>as,<br />
texts, and forms of discourse was the norm.<br />
Judaism proved much more receptive to basic Muslim doctrinal notions<br />
such as divine unicity than Christianity, and it was Muʿtazilism in particular<br />
that was adopted to varying <strong>de</strong>grees from the 9th century onwards<br />
by both Rabbanite and Karaite authors, so that by the turn of the 11th century<br />
a “Jewish Muʿtazila” had emerged. Jewish scholars both composed<br />
original works along Muʿtazilite lines and produced copies of Muslim<br />
Muʿtazilite books, often transcribed into Hebrew characters. The influence<br />
of the Muʿtazila found its way to the very centres of Jewish religious<br />
and intellectual life in the East. The Karaites and several of the Heads of<br />
the ancient Rabbanite Aca<strong>de</strong>mies (Yeshivot) of Sura and Pumbedita (located<br />
by the 10th century in Baghdad) adopted the Muʿtazilite worldview.<br />
By contrast, Ashʿarite works and authors were received among Jewish<br />
scholars to a significantly lesser <strong>de</strong>gree and in a predominantly critical<br />
way. The study of Jewish Muʿtazilism began a century ago with the<br />
works of S. Munk (1859) and M. Schreiner (1895). Schreiner and Munk,<br />
however, were not aware of the primary sources to be found among the<br />
various Genizah materials that had been discovered and retrieved during<br />
the second half of the 19th century in Cairo by a number of scholars<br />
and manuscript collectors. Among the many Muʿtazilite manuscripts<br />
found in the Abraham Firkovitch collection (taken from the former library<br />
of the Karaite Synagogue in Cairo) thirteen were <strong>de</strong>scribed in <strong>de</strong>tail<br />
by A.J. Borisov in an article published in 1935. Additional landmarks in the<br />
study of Jewish Muʿtazilism were H. A. Wolfson’s Repercussions of the Kalam<br />
in Jewish Philosophy (1979) and G. Vajda’s studies on Yūsuf al-Baṣīr,<br />
particularly his edition of Baṣīr’s al-Kitāb al-Muḥtawī on the basis of a<br />
manuscript from the Kaufmann collection in Budapest (1985). On the basis<br />
of Borisov’s <strong>de</strong>scriptions of the Firkovitch Muʿtazilite manuscripts and<br />
from fragments in the British Library, H. Ben-Shammai was able to draw<br />
additional conclusions regarding the i<strong>de</strong>ntity of some of the Muʿtazilite<br />
materials preserved by the Karaites.<br />
In 2003, the “Muʿtazilite Manuscripts Project Group” was foun<strong>de</strong>d<br />
by the head of the Research Unit Intellectual History of the Islamicate<br />
World, Sabine Schmidtke, and by the Director of Research, Center<br />
for the Study of Ju<strong>de</strong>o-Arabic Culture, Ben Zvi Institute (Jerusalem),<br />
David Sklare, in or<strong>de</strong>r to assemble and i<strong>de</strong>ntify as many fragments of<br />
Muʿtazilite manuscripts as possible from Jewish as well as Shīʿī repositories.<br />
Although much has been achieved over the past years, major textual<br />
resources still remain unexplored. Among the fragments of philosophical<br />
and theological texts found in the various Genizah collections, the material<br />
that originated in the Ben Ezra Genizah (Cairo) and is nowadays<br />
mostly preserved in the Taylor-Schechter collection at Cambridge University<br />
Library (and other libraries in Europe and the USA) is until now<br />
still largely uni<strong>de</strong>ntified and only rudimentarily catalogued. A systematic<br />
study of all Muʿtazilite fragments will ren<strong>de</strong>r the reconstruction of many<br />
more so far lost Muʿtazilite (Muslim and Jewish) writings possible. As<br />
such, this Genizah material significantly supplements the extensive findings<br />
of the manuscript material found in the Russian National Library in<br />
St. Petersburg, which likewise has so far only partly been explored.<br />
The Research Unit (Gregor Schwarb) has been working on the reconstruction<br />
of several key-texts of Jewish Muʿtazilism, such as Yeshuʿah ben<br />
Yehudah’s K. al-Tawriya or Sahl b. al-Faḍl al-Tustarī’s K. al-Īmāʾ and will<br />
edit a number of Muʿtazilite texts by Muslim authors which have only<br />
been preserved in Jewish manuscript collections (Omar Hamdan / Sabine<br />
Schmidtke / Gregor Schwarb).<br />
Muʿtazilism had also left its mark on the theological thought of the Samaritans.<br />
It is not clear whether Samaritans (whose intellectual centres<br />
between the 9th to the 11th centuries were mainly Nablus and Damascus)<br />
had studied Muslim Muʿtazilite writings directly or whether they rather<br />
became acquainted with them through Jewish adaptations of Muʿtazilism.<br />
The study of Samaritan literary activities in Arabic in general and of Samaritan<br />
Muʿtazilism in particular is still very much at the beginning. The<br />
only relevant text that has been partly edited and studied is the Kitāb al-<br />
Tubākh by the 11th century author Abū l-Ḥasan al-Ṣūrī, who clearly shares<br />
the Muʿtazilite doctrinal outlook. The majority of Samaritan theological<br />
writings composed in Arabic still await a close analysis. New insights into<br />
the quality of Samaritan Muʿtazilism will be presented in a forthcoming<br />
study on two newly i<strong>de</strong>ntified Samaritan treatises by Abū l-Ḥasan<br />
al-Ṣūrī and Munajjā b. Ṣedaqah (Gregor Schwarb).<br />
Moreover, Muslim theologians <strong>de</strong>voted much thought and energy to a<br />
critical examination and refutation of the views of Christianity and (to a<br />
lesser extent) Judaism, as is evi<strong>de</strong>nt from the numerous polemical tracts<br />
written by them against these religions. While the majority of refutations<br />
against Christianity by early Muslim theologians are lost,<br />
there are a few extant anti-Christian texts from the 9th century that give a<br />
24 25
good impression of the arguments that were employed. Moreover, many<br />
of the earliest treatises in <strong>de</strong>fense of Christianity in Arabic are preserved,<br />
and it is evi<strong>de</strong>nt that their authors were well acquainted with Muslim<br />
kalām techniques and terminology. Given the basic disagreements between<br />
Muslim and Christian theological positions, such as the Muslim<br />
notion of divine unicity (tawḥīd), which is incompatible with the Christian<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of trinity and incarnation, any kind of far-reaching<br />
adoption of any of the Muslim school doctrines by Christian theologians<br />
was out of question. The most intensive reception of Muslim kalām can be<br />
observed among Coptic and Syriac-orthodox writers (Bar Hebraeus<br />
and contemporaries) of the 13th and 14th centuries.<br />
Approximately all extant writings of the first generation of Christian<br />
mutakallimūn writing in Arabic have been edited and (partly) translated,<br />
and mo<strong>de</strong>rn scholars, such as S. H. Griffith and D. Thomas, have studied<br />
them in <strong>de</strong>tail. Likewise, all of the few extant anti-Christian writings by<br />
Muslim rational theologians have been published in critical editions. By<br />
contrast, much work still needs to be done on the vast corpus of Coptic<br />
Christian writings (13th and 14th c. CE), only few of which have so<br />
far been published in critical editions, let alone studied. It is this corpus<br />
that still needs to be ma<strong>de</strong> available in critical editions and to be studied<br />
in or<strong>de</strong>r to locate them within the “whirlpool” of intellectual activities<br />
in the medieval world of Islam. Through a comprehensive study on the<br />
reception of Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī in the writings<br />
of Coptic theologians of the 13th and 14th centuries and the edition<br />
of the two major works by al-Rashīd Abū l-Khayr Ibn al-Ṭayyib,<br />
Gregor Schwarb will highlight the contribution of Jewish and Muslim intellectual<br />
thought to the “Gol<strong>de</strong>n Age” of Copto-Arabic literature.<br />
Within the field of theological rationalism in the medieval world of Islam<br />
between the 10th and the 13th centuries beyond and across <strong>de</strong>nominational<br />
bor<strong>de</strong>rs, all major <strong>de</strong>si<strong>de</strong>rata have been i<strong>de</strong>ntified and are being<br />
addressed in a number of projects in the framework of the ERC Project<br />
“Rediscovering Theological Rationalism in the Medieval World<br />
of Islam”. Among the most important ongoing projects within this field<br />
are the Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology (editor: Sabine Schmidtke)<br />
that will comprise some forty contributions by internationally renowned<br />
scholars in the field, among them all team members of the Research Unit.<br />
The publication of the Handbook is envisaged for 2013.<br />
Another more specific though at the same time groundbreaking project<br />
of the Research Unit is the Handbook of Muʿtazilite Works and Authors<br />
that has been accepted for publication by Brill (Lei<strong>de</strong>n) (editor: Gregor<br />
Schwarb). The work, which is close to completion, will discuss in <strong>de</strong>tail<br />
some 500 representatives of Muʿtazilism (Sunnis, Twelver Shīʿīs, Zaydīs<br />
and Jews), together with <strong>de</strong>tailed inventories of their respective theological<br />
writings and extant manuscripts.<br />
♦<br />
– was felt also in North-Africa and Islamic Spain (al-Andalus). Among<br />
the staunchest opponents of these two currents of rational theology was<br />
Abū Muḥammad Ibn Ḥazm (d. 1064) who was a representative of the<br />
Ẓāhirī or literalist approach to the sacred scriptures and who categorically<br />
rejected all theological speculation. This resulted in a series<br />
of works in which he vehemently polemicized against the teachings of<br />
both Muʿtazilites and Ashʿarites. The Research Unit (Sabine Schmidtke,<br />
in collaboration with Maribel Fierro and Camilla Adang) is finalizing a<br />
reference work <strong>de</strong>voted to the Ẓāhirī thinker Ibn Ḥazm, entitled Ibn<br />
Ḥazm of Cordoba: Life and Works of a Controversial Thinker, that will be<br />
published (early 2013) in the Brill series “Handbuch <strong>de</strong>r Orientalistik”. The<br />
majority of contributions were presented during an international conference<br />
held in Istanbul in 2008 (fun<strong>de</strong>d by the Gerda Henkel Foundation).<br />
The sections that will be covered in the volume are “Life and Times of Ibn<br />
Ḥazm”, “Legal Aspects”, “Ẓāhirī Linguistics”, “Art and Aesthetics”, “Theology,<br />
Philosophy and Ethics”, “Intra- and Interreligious Polemics”, “Reception<br />
and Impact on Medieval and Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Muslim thought”.<br />
Another project (Sophia Vasalou) focuses on the theology of the Hanbalite<br />
scholar Taqī al-Dīn Ibn Taymiyya (d. 1328). Ibn Taymiyya represents<br />
an important case both in terms of the history of the changing<br />
relationship of Ḥanbalite theologians – traditionally distrustful of the<br />
methods of reason – to other theological schools, but also in terms<br />
of evolving accounts of the relationship between reason and revelation.<br />
In this context, Ibn Taymiyya’s view of ethics and the sources of<br />
moral knowledge holds particular significance. Ibn Taymiyya seeks to<br />
articulate a new via media between existing approaches to the nature of<br />
value which would transcend both Muʿtazilite and Ashʿarite configurations.<br />
Influenced both by his extensive readings of kalām as well as his<br />
wi<strong>de</strong>-ranging interests in falsafa, Ibn Taymiyya articulates a view that<br />
presents itself as a revised Muʿtazilism, claiming that reason <strong>de</strong>livers<br />
knowledge of the values of human actions. This claim involves a reworked<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of reason that brings it into close relationship with a new<br />
epistemological idiom, that of human nature or fiṭra. In this new configuration,<br />
the notion of welfare or maṣlaḥa comes to occupy a crucial<br />
role, and a heavy accent is placed on the role of <strong>de</strong>sire, as against reason,<br />
in the knowledge of good and evil. The <strong>de</strong>eper motivations of Ibn Taymiyya’s<br />
proposed synthesis are rooted in an un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of theology in<br />
which theological doctrines are un<strong>de</strong>rstood and assessed in terms of their<br />
pragmatic, or better said, “spiritual”, ends. Just how this synthesis relates<br />
to the existing theological possibilities represented by the Mu‘tazilite and<br />
Ash‘arite schools is a central question to consi<strong>de</strong>r in this connection, and<br />
one that holds the key to un<strong>de</strong>rstanding both the genuine innovativeness,<br />
as well as the true substance, of Ibn Taymiyya’s rationalism. Gaining a<br />
clearer view of Ibn Taymiyya’s ethical approach is of crucial importance,<br />
on the one hand, for refining our history of a theological <strong>de</strong>bate<br />
that played a significant part in Islamic theological self-un<strong>de</strong>rstanding. At<br />
the same time, and given the wi<strong>de</strong> diffusion of Ibn Taymiyya’s legacy<br />
in the mo<strong>de</strong>rn era, it may also enable us to construct the prolegomena<br />
for a history of contemporary theological <strong>de</strong>velopments.<br />
Counterreactions<br />
Although the Muʿtazila and the Ashʿariyya originated in the Eastern<br />
part of the Islamic world, their influence – especially that of the latter<br />
♦<br />
26 27
The intellectual and religious heritage of Shīʿism (Zaydism and<br />
Imamism)<br />
The scholarly investigation of Shīʿite Islam and its three branches, Twelver<br />
(or Imami) Shīʿism, Zaydism and Ismāʿīlism, began much later than that<br />
of Sunnī Islam, and Shīʿism has long been consi<strong>de</strong>red to be of marginal<br />
importance at best. The Iranian Revolution of 1979, which cannot be<br />
un<strong>de</strong>rstood without taking the legal characteristics of Twelver Shīʿism<br />
and its historical <strong>de</strong>velopment into consi<strong>de</strong>ration, has proved this evaluation<br />
to be wrong and since then the study of Twelver Shīʿite Islam is<br />
steadily on the rise. The study of Ismāʿīlism has been actively promoted<br />
over the last three <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s by the current imam of the Nizārī Ismāʿīlīs, Aga<br />
Khan IV (b. 1936), and the Institute of Ismaili Studies in London that was<br />
established in 1977 un<strong>de</strong>r his auspices. In contrast to these two branches<br />
of Shīʿite Islam, Zaydism has so far attracted much less scholarly attention,<br />
partly because it has been perceived as being more marginal than<br />
either Twelver Shīʿism (which is the state religion of Iran and a politically<br />
significant community in Lebanon, Iraq and the Arabian peninsula) and<br />
Ismāʿīlism (due to the active role of the Aga Khan in its scholarly investigation).<br />
However, the recent conflict in Yemen shows how important it<br />
is to un<strong>de</strong>rstand the legal and political notions of Zaydism, as its adherents<br />
represent some of the most significant political factions in the country,<br />
and their views will no doubt be an important factor in the future<br />
<strong>de</strong>velopments in Yemen.<br />
It is only during the last years that the vast holdings of the various private<br />
and smaller public libraries of Yemen are being ma<strong>de</strong> available<br />
to the scholarly community. While some of these materials have been<br />
used for various publications by members of the “Muʿtazilite Manuscripts<br />
Project Group”, the majority still awaits close study. This also applies to<br />
the <strong>de</strong>velopment of Muʿtazilite thought among the Zaydites from the 12th<br />
century onwards.<br />
The Research Unit (Hassan Ansari / Sabine Schmidtke / Gregor Schwarb /<br />
Jan Thiele) focusses on some of the most neglected fields of Zaydī thought<br />
and practice. Some results of these efforts are inclu<strong>de</strong>d in a special issue<br />
of the peer-reviewed journal Arabica: Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies/Revue<br />
d’étu<strong>de</strong>s arabes et islamiques, The neglected Šīʿites: Studies in<br />
the legal and intellectual history of the Zaydīs = Arabica 59 iii-iv (<strong>2012</strong>)<br />
that is published by Brill, Lei<strong>de</strong>n.<br />
Gregor Schwarb is preparing a comprehensive study of the <strong>de</strong>velopment<br />
of Zaydī legal methodology (uṣūl al-fiqh) that is closely related<br />
to Muʿtazilism on the one hand and to Ḥanafism on the other. Jan<br />
Thiele is focusing on Zaydī Yemenī doctrinal thought during the 12th<br />
and early 13th centuries that was primarily un<strong>de</strong>r the influence of the<br />
Muʿtazilite thought of the school of the Bahshamiyya. Besi<strong>de</strong> his in<strong>de</strong>pth<br />
studies into the ontology and cosmology of al-Ḥasan al-Raṣṣāṣ he is<br />
now preparing an editio princeps of the majority of the latter’s works on<br />
theology. One of the major concerns of al-Raṣṣāṣ was with the rival group<br />
of the Muṭarrifiyya, whose adherents upheld notions of natural causality<br />
and a cosmology that was inconceivable for mainstream Zaydism of<br />
the time. Hassan Ansari is currently preparing a comprehensive study<br />
on the doctrinal history of the Muṭarrifiyya. Hassan Ansari and Sabine<br />
Schmidtke further study the doctrinal <strong>de</strong>velopments of Yemeni Zaydī<br />
thought since the 13th century, focusing in particular on the growing<br />
The Hebrew University of Jerusalem<br />
The Institute of Asian and African Studies<br />
The Nehemia Levtzion Center for Islamic Studies<br />
and<br />
Freie Universität<br />
Research Unit Intellectual History of the Islamicate World<br />
announce<br />
The second<br />
New Frontiers in Islamic Studies<br />
German-Israeli Summer School<br />
fun<strong>de</strong>d by the Einstein-Stiftung, Berlin<br />
9–14 September at Freie Universität Berlin<br />
The Genizah:<br />
An unexploited source for the intellectual<br />
history of the medieval world of Islam<br />
The purpose of this School is to introduce stu<strong>de</strong>nts<br />
of Islamic Studies to the immense riches of<br />
the Genizah, to <strong>de</strong>monstrate its relevance and<br />
potential through a number of case studies and<br />
to enable them to work with the Genizah materials<br />
on their own. Special emphasis will be laid on<br />
technical and methodological issues related to<br />
the material.<br />
Conveners:<br />
Prof. Sabine Schmidtke (FU)<br />
and Prof. Reuven Amitai (HU)<br />
Coordinator: Jan Thiele<br />
The School is aimed at graduate<br />
(MA and PhD) stu<strong>de</strong>nts in Islamic<br />
Studies and adjacent fields. The<br />
School will be conducted in English;<br />
reading knowledge of Arabic is<br />
required (knowledge of Hebrew is<br />
preferred, but not necessary).<br />
Stu<strong>de</strong>nts coming from outsi<strong>de</strong> Berlin<br />
will receive full room and board.<br />
Attendance throughout the week<br />
of the Summer School is mandatory.<br />
The School will be consi<strong>de</strong>red<br />
equivalent to 2 aca<strong>de</strong>mic credits<br />
(approval pending).<br />
For further information and application<br />
please contact Jan Thiele<br />
e-mail: jan.thiele@arcor.<strong>de</strong><br />
Application ends 31 May <strong>2012</strong><br />
28
eservations of Zaydī theologians towards the doctrines of the Bahshamites,<br />
as is the case with the prominent and prolific theologian of the 13th<br />
century, ʿAbd Allāh b. Zayd al-ʿAnsī (d. 1268).<br />
Another project of the Research Unit (Hassan Ansari / Sabine Schmidtke)<br />
is concerned with the socio-legal history of the Zaydīs in Northern<br />
Iran beyond the 12th century that has so far hardly been explored in<br />
scholarship, using an untapped source, the Kitāb al-Ibāna by the 11th century<br />
legal scholar al-Hawsamī and the rich commentary literature that<br />
has been written on this work over several generations. A <strong>de</strong>tailed analysis<br />
of the text and its commentaries first aims at reconstructing the networks<br />
of Zaydī scholars of Northern Iran from the 10th century until the<br />
beginning of the Safavid dynasty (15th century). In addition to this, the<br />
text is being used to prepare a study of the <strong>de</strong>velopment of legal doctrines<br />
among the Nāṣiriyya branch.<br />
Within the field of Twelver Shīʿism, Hassan Ansari and Sabine Schmidtke<br />
are tracing new, so far unexplored and often unknown doctrinal works,<br />
focusing in particular on the interim period between the two towering<br />
figures of al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā (d. 1044) and al-Ḥimmaṣī al-Rāzī (d. 1204),<br />
author of al-Munqidh min al-taqlīd who was significantly influenced by<br />
the theological thought of Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī (d. 1045) as against al-<br />
Murtaḍā who maintained mostly the views of the Bahshamiyya.<br />
Interreligious Controversies<br />
♦<br />
The relations between the Muslim majority and the members of religious<br />
minorities (Jews and Christians) in the central lands of the Ottoman<br />
Empire and in Iran received a series of new stimuli from the 15th and 16th<br />
centuries onwards, which were reflected in intensified encounters in the<br />
intellectual, literary, and social spheres.<br />
The most important momentum in the Ottoman Empire for a new social<br />
and intellectual flourishing of the Jews in particular was the immigration<br />
of Jewish exiles from the Iberian Peninsula in the aftermath of<br />
the Spanish Reconquista of 1492. In Safavid and early Qajar Iran<br />
(ca. 1500–1850), it was the increasing presence of Christian, initially<br />
mainly Catholic, missionaries that constituted the main catalyst. From<br />
the 19th century onwards they were joined by Protestant missionaries,<br />
mainly from Britain. In the Ottoman Empire, where native Christians of<br />
different <strong>de</strong>nominations were numerous, the foreign missionary effort<br />
seems to have had less of an impact than in Iran. On the other hand, the<br />
Jewish communities in the latter country did not experience the same<br />
kind of renaissance enjoyed by their coreligionists in the Ottoman lands.<br />
Most studies of the social position of Jews and Christians in both abovementioned<br />
areas are based mainly on writings produced by members of<br />
the minority groups, which often results in a one-si<strong>de</strong>d picture. A systematic<br />
and comprehensive discussion of materials documenting the<br />
Muslim perception of the non-Muslim minorities is still largely absent.<br />
One type of source that has hitherto been insufficiently explored<br />
is Muslim polemical and apologetical literature. In more than one<br />
respect, this genre of writings can supply information about the intellectual<br />
as well as the social position of the religious minorities. The<br />
arguments used, the events and persons referred to (even if at times only<br />
obliquely), as well as the literary sources quoted allow us to draw conclusions<br />
concerning the position of the respective minority. Moreover, the<br />
statements with which the Muslim authors preface or justify their works,<br />
the multiplication of polemical and apologetical tracts and the proliferation<br />
of copies of these same tracts, inform us about the socio-historical<br />
contexts in which these texts were written and subsequently reproduced.<br />
Muslim apologetical and polemical literature against other monotheistic<br />
religions from the first six centuries of the Islamic era has been<br />
relatively well studied. However, existing research repeatedly raises the<br />
contention that in subsequent centuries this type of literature had little<br />
new to offer and that relatively few such tracts were being produced to<br />
begin with, so that further scholarly occupation with this field would<br />
yield few results. This contention is based on a mere lack of information<br />
on the relevant material that can be encountered in libraries in presentday<br />
Turkey, Iran and India. With regard to Iran, where private and public<br />
collections of manuscripts are relatively well catalogued by now, it is clear<br />
that a wealth of hitherto unexplored manuscript material is available<br />
which can shed important new light on the relations between the<br />
Muslim majority and the religious minorities un<strong>de</strong>r its rule. In the case<br />
of Turkey, where the process of cataloguing manuscripts is in a less advanced<br />
stage, chance finds of isolated manuscripts have already revealed<br />
that a systematic search for, and study of, polemical and apologetical<br />
materials is a worthwhile un<strong>de</strong>rtaking. Moreover, many libraries<br />
in India (holding consi<strong>de</strong>rable collections of polemical works in Persian<br />
from 17th century onward) and Europe (among them in particular the<br />
Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana in Rome) have important holdings in<br />
this field which so far remain untapped. So far, well over three hundred<br />
relevant texts have been located, and as the project progresses, numerous<br />
additional texts are likely to be discovered.<br />
Major results of this project have already been published over the past<br />
years. At present, the following projects are being addressed by members<br />
of the Research Unit:<br />
(Dennis Halft) It was particularly during the early 17th century that European<br />
missionaries found a favourable climate to promote the Catholic<br />
faith in the Safavid Empire. Welcomed by the Shāh in his capital Isfahan,<br />
the missionaires held disputations with Shīʿī scholars on Christian<br />
and Islamic doctrines. From these disputations arose an extensive<br />
Muslim polemical literature in Persian refuting Christian beliefs that<br />
has been little studied so far. Among these Shīʿī scholars Sayyid Aḥmad<br />
ʿAlawī (d. betw. 1644 and 1650), a well-known disciple of Shaykh Bahāʾī<br />
(d. 1622 or -23) and Mīr Dāmād (d. 1631), composed five polemical writings<br />
against the Christian doctrine, among them Miṣqal-i ṣafāʾ dar<br />
tajliya u taṣfiya-yi Āyina-yi ḥaqq-numā (about 1032/1622–23). In ʿAlawī’s<br />
treatises, which have come down to us in about 40 manuscripts in different<br />
recensions, the representative of the so-called School of Isfahan brings<br />
forward both theological and philosophical arguments by Illuminationists<br />
as well as Peripatetics with strong references to Sufi thought in refutation<br />
of the concepts of Trinity and Incarnation and in support of the Muslim<br />
faith. Based on a comprehensive discussion of the manuscript copies and<br />
the author’s Arabic literary sources, the project aims to analyze Sayyid<br />
Aḥmad ʿAlawī’s theological and philosophical thinking regarding Christi-<br />
30 31
anity on the vast intellectual background of his time. The wi<strong>de</strong> diffusion<br />
of copies of ʿAlawī’s treatises with an apparent Wirkungsgeschichte on<br />
later refutations as far as India points to the significance of his thinking<br />
in a period of transition from Arabic to Persian polemical writings<br />
during the 17th century. Combining different approaches of Islamic as<br />
well as Comparative Religious Studies, the project proposes to make a<br />
contribution to the study of the perception of Christianity by Shīʿī Muslims<br />
and of the inter<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce of Christian-Muslim thinking.<br />
(Reza Pourjavady / Sabine Schmidtke) During the Qajar period a number<br />
of comprehensive polemic tracts against Judaism were composed,<br />
mostly by converts or their <strong>de</strong>scendants. Most of this material is preserved<br />
in Iranian libraries only and therefore beyond the reach of most Western<br />
scholars, while Iranian scholars often hesitate to work on these materials.<br />
Among these texts is Maḥḍar al-shuhūd fī radd-i yahūd by Ḥājjī Bābā b.<br />
Muḥammad Ismāʿīl Qazwīnī Yazdī, who was the son of a Jewish convert<br />
to Islam, that was completed on 5 March 1797. The book consists<br />
of seven comprehensive chapters (bāb), most of which are further subdivi<strong>de</strong>d<br />
into sections (faṣl). It is replete with Biblical materials adduced<br />
to prove the prophet Muḥammad’s annunciation in the Bible, discusses<br />
in <strong>de</strong>tail the earlier prophets on the basis of biblical, pseudo-biblical and<br />
later Islamic materials, and treats likewise in <strong>de</strong>tail Christianity and the<br />
correct perception of Jesus Christ. As such, the work which is impressive<br />
in its elaborateness and variety of materials it contains, shares<br />
characteristics with a variety of literary genres well known from earlier<br />
periods – most importantly the famous genre of the dalāʾil al-nubuwwa,<br />
works <strong>de</strong>tailing the proofs for the prophethood of Muḥammad, and the<br />
genre of interreligious polemics. Although the text is not unknown to the<br />
scholarly community, it has not been analyzed as to its sources, the materials<br />
and arguments it contains or its reception among later rea<strong>de</strong>rs –<br />
Muslim and Jewish alike. Its popularity and significance is evi<strong>de</strong>nt from<br />
the comparatively high number of preserved manuscripts. The text has<br />
been published twice on the basis of a single manuscript respectively, first<br />
in the 1960ies by Aḥmad al-Ḥusaynī on the basis of a manuscript held in<br />
Yazd (Yazd: Kitābkhāna-yi Vazīrī, 196-[?]) and again in 2000 by Ḥāmid<br />
Ḥasan Navvāb on the basis of one of the manuscripts held in Qum (Qum:<br />
Ḥuẓūr, 2000). None of these qualifies as a critical edition, for apart from<br />
the narrow manuscript basis the editors lacked the required philological<br />
ability to treat the numerous Hebrew quotations contained in the text<br />
with sufficient justice. Moreover, no attempt was ma<strong>de</strong> to analyze the<br />
intellectual background of the author and to trace his sources. We have<br />
been able to trace so far eleven manuscript copies of the text in Iranian<br />
libraries (Tehran: Dānishgāh, Majlis, Malik Millī, Millī; Yazd: Kitābkhānayi<br />
Vazīrī; Qum: Kitābkhāna-yi Āyat Allāh Nūrī, Markaz-i iḥyāʾ-i mīrāth-i<br />
Islām; Tabrīz: Kitābkhāna-yi Thiqat al-islām) and more may come to light<br />
in European libraries. Within the Research Unit, a critical edition of the<br />
text will be prepared, together with an in<strong>de</strong>pth analysis of its sources, in<br />
or<strong>de</strong>r to be able to locate the text on the larger map of interreligious<br />
exchanges during the pre-mo<strong>de</strong>rn and, more specifically, Qajar period<br />
of Iranian history.<br />
♦<br />
a r a b i c a s p e c i a l i s s u e<br />
Arabica - Special Issue 59/3-4<br />
Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies/Revue d’étu<strong>de</strong>s arabes et islamiques<br />
Guest-Editor: Sabine Schmidtke<br />
Originally foun<strong>de</strong>d by Evariste Lévi-Provençal in 1954 as an organ for French arabists, Arabica<br />
has now become a multidisciplinary aca<strong>de</strong>mic journal, with an international editorial board<br />
representing various fields of research. It is <strong>de</strong>dicated to the study of the Arab world’s classical and<br />
contemporary literatures, languages, history, thought and civilization. From a wi<strong>de</strong>r perspective,<br />
Arabica is open to the general fields of Islamicate studies and intercultural relations between Arab<br />
societies and the other cultural areas throughout history. It actively en<strong>de</strong>avors to participate in<br />
the <strong>de</strong>velopment of new scholarly approaches and problematics. In addition to original research<br />
articles in English and French (preferably), Arabica also publishes ‘notes and documents’, book<br />
reviews, and occasionally aca<strong>de</strong>mic <strong>de</strong>bates in its ‘methods and <strong>de</strong>bates’ section. Special issues<br />
may <strong>de</strong>al with a specific theme, or publish the proceedings of a conference.<br />
The neglected Šīʿites: Studies in the legal and intellectual history of the Zaydīs<br />
Guest-Editor: Sabine Schmidtke<br />
Arabica 59/3-4<br />
SOMMAIRE/CONTENTS<br />
• <strong>2012</strong>: Volume 59 (in 6 issues)<br />
• ISSN 0570-5398 / E-ISSN 1570-0585<br />
• Institutional subscription rates<br />
Electronic only: EUR 455.- / US$ 637.-<br />
Print only: EUR 501.- / US$ 701.-<br />
Electronic + Print: EUR 546.- / US$ 764.-<br />
• Individual subscription rates<br />
Print only: EUR 167.- / US$ 234.-<br />
For more information see www.brill.nl/arab<br />
Sabine Schmidtke, The History of Zaydī Studies: An Introduction 185<br />
Najam Hai<strong>de</strong>r, A Kūfan Jurist in Yemen:<br />
Contextualizing Muḥammad b. Sulaymān al-Kūfī’s Kitāb al-Muntaḫab 200<br />
Sabine Schmidtke, Biblical Predictions of the Prophet Muḥammad<br />
among the Zaydīs of Iran 218<br />
Hassan Ansari, Un muḥaddiṯ muʿtazilite zaydite : Abū Saʿd al-Sammān<br />
et ses Amālī 267<br />
Jan Thiele, La causalité selon al-Ḥākim al-Ǧišumī 291<br />
Maher Jarrar, Al-Manṣūr bi-Llāh’s controversy with Twelver Šīʿites<br />
concerning the occultation of the Imam in his Kitāb al-ʿIqd al-ṯamīn 319<br />
Bernard Haykel and Aron Zysow, What Makes a Maḏhab a Maḏhab:<br />
Zaydī <strong>de</strong>bates on the structure of legal authority 332<br />
Gregor Schwarb, Muʿtazilism in a 20th century Zaydī Qurʾān<br />
commentary 371<br />
James Robin King, Zaydī revival in a hostile republic: Competing<br />
i<strong>de</strong>ntities, loyalties and visions of state in Republican Yemen 403<br />
32
Bible in Arabic among Christians, Jews and Muslims<br />
Many of the major translations of the Bible, produced from ancient<br />
into mo<strong>de</strong>rn times, resulted from the need for more accessible versions<br />
of the sacred scriptures felt among Jews and/or Christians.<br />
The Old and/or New Testaments were no longer un<strong>de</strong>rstood in their original<br />
languages (Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek) by large parts of these communities<br />
who either spoke or became more wi<strong>de</strong>ly educated in their current<br />
vernaculars and/or lingua franca. Thus the Septuagint (produced in<br />
Alexandria, around the 3rd century B.C.E), filled the need of Greek-speaking<br />
Jews, and later also of early Christians; the Latin Vulgate supplied<br />
the Catholic clergy in medieval Europe with a more accessible version.<br />
Other famous, if much later, examples inclu<strong>de</strong> the German translation<br />
produced by Martin Luther in the 16th century, or the King James Bible<br />
produced around the same time in England, which aimed to make the<br />
Bible accessible to the populace in their spoken tongues. In the Middle<br />
East of pre-Islamic times, there also existed various Bible translations:<br />
Aramaic-speaking Jews produced a range of Jewish Aramaic translations<br />
(e.g., the Targum), often used alongsi<strong>de</strong> the Hebrew Bible, while Christian<br />
Aramaic speakers produced various Syriac versions (e.g., the Peshitta),<br />
often used alongsi<strong>de</strong> the Septuagint. With the spread of Islam, however,<br />
Arabic became the new common language, and the hallmark of<br />
the cultured elites, not only among the growing body of converts to Islam,<br />
but also among those whom the Qurʾān calls “People of the Book”,<br />
namely, the Jews and the Christians, whose scriptural heritage guaranteed<br />
their religious autonomy throughout the Islamic domain. From the<br />
8th century socially-mobile Christians and Jews used Arabic not only for<br />
speech but also as their written language, for religious, literary and scientific<br />
purposes. They increasingly composed and consumed works in<br />
Arabic alongsi<strong>de</strong> their continued usage of culturally-distinctive literary<br />
and liturgical writings in Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Syriac and Coptic. The<br />
ol<strong>de</strong>st Arabic Bible versions have come down to us from this early<br />
stage of the arabicization process of these groups for whom scriptural<br />
translation was the initial vehicle in reforming their communal i<strong>de</strong>ntity<br />
and adapting it to a new world at a time of profound political and cultural<br />
change. Christians and Jews of different <strong>de</strong>nominations (Rabbanites,<br />
Karaites, Jacobites, Nestorians and Copts) as well as Samaritans now<br />
started to produce translations of those parts of the Bible they held<br />
sacred. With the spread of Islam to Spain, local Catholic clergymen, too,<br />
started to become involved in these activities. The Arabic translations in<br />
turn engen<strong>de</strong>red a host of commentaries, likewise in Arabic, on individual<br />
biblical books or the entire Bible. Together with Camilla Adang, Meira<br />
Polliack (Tel Aviv University) and Ronny Vollandt (CNRS, Paris), the Research<br />
Unit is currently preparing a comprehensive research project that<br />
will address these schools of translation and their inner varieties in<br />
great <strong>de</strong>tail. Apart from fully preserved texts, thousands of manuscript<br />
fragments and codices containing portions of these translations and<br />
commentaries have come down to us, although, with a few notable exceptions,<br />
only few of them have so far been studied in <strong>de</strong>pth. They reveal a<br />
large variety in stylistic approaches, vocabulary, scripts (e.g., Hebrew or<br />
Syriac), i<strong>de</strong>ologies (e.g., literal versus explanatory translations) and specific<br />
doctrinal aspects.<br />
Once Arabic translations became readily available, Muslims, too, began<br />
to take a greater interest in the Jewish and Christian scriptures, in which<br />
they believed the Prophet Muḥammad was annunciated and the coming<br />
of Islam foretold. Some of the earliest extant texts by Muslim writers<br />
containing significant Biblical material have already been studied by<br />
members of the Research Unit (Sabine Schmidtke). In the more comprehensive<br />
project, all genres of Islamic literature and thought in which the<br />
influence of the Arabic Bible translation movement may be perceived will<br />
be taken into consi<strong>de</strong>ration.<br />
Achievements (2003–<strong>2012</strong>)<br />
♦<br />
The Research Unit Intellectual History of the Islamicate World at<br />
Freie Universität Berlin combines the research projects <strong>de</strong>voted to post-<br />
Avicennan philosophy, the “Muʿtazilite Manuscripts Project Group”, the<br />
Research Project “Rediscovering Theological Rationalism in the Medieval<br />
World of Islam”, including Counterreactions; the Research Projects “Bible<br />
in Arabic” and “Interreligious Contacts and Controversies in the Ottoman<br />
Empire and pre-mo<strong>de</strong>rn Iran” and the projects <strong>de</strong>voted to “Mysticism”.<br />
Some aspects of the research project <strong>de</strong>voted to post-Avicennan philosophy<br />
began in 2003, fun<strong>de</strong>d by a grant by the German-Israeli Foundation<br />
(GIF) (2003–06). It resulted in several publications on the early commentators<br />
of Suhrawardī, ʿIzz al-Dawla Ibn Kammūna, Shams al-Dīn al-<br />
Shahrazūrī and Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī, and a number of representatives<br />
of the so-called “School of Shīrāz”, among them a monograph on the life<br />
and work of the Jewish philosopher Ibn Kammūna (a Persian translation<br />
will soon go to press) and critical editions of most of his writings in philosophy.<br />
Within this research area, three new projects have been <strong>de</strong>fined,<br />
viz. (i) “Critical Avicennism in the Islamic East of the 12th century”, (ii)<br />
Muslim and Jewish philosophy intertwined during the 13th through 15th<br />
centuries, (iii) “Philosophy in Iran during the Ṣafavid and Qajar Period”.<br />
Some results of the second project have already been published.<br />
The “Muʿtazilite Manuscripts Project Group” was foun<strong>de</strong>d in 2003,42<br />
an international group of some fifteen scholars from Europe, the US, Israel<br />
and Palestine, from Lebanon, Oman, Yemen, Saudi Arabia and Iran, setting<br />
out to collect, record and prepare critical editions of all unpublished<br />
material of Muʿtazilite provenance. Fun<strong>de</strong>d by various grants of the Fritz<br />
Thyssen Foundation (2005–07, 2010–11), the Gerda Henkel Foundation<br />
(2005, 2008), and the Rothschild Foundation (Yad ha-nadiv) (2006), the<br />
project has held three international workshops in Istanbul (with participants<br />
from the West, including Israel, and the Islamic World) and published<br />
more than twenty critical editions and facsimiles, along with several<br />
monographs and edited volumes and many studies.<br />
The efforts of the “Muʿtazilite Manuscripts Project Group” have been<br />
merged since 2008 with the Research Project “Rediscovering Theological<br />
Rationalism in the Medieval World of Islam”, that is fun<strong>de</strong>d by<br />
the European Research Council (2008–13).43 The project focuses on theo-<br />
42 http://www.geisteswissenschaften.fu-berlin.<strong>de</strong>/izma/forschung/laufend/mutazila/in<strong>de</strong>x.html.<br />
43 http://www.facebook.com/\#!/pages/Rediscovering-Theological-Rationalism-in-the-Medieval-<br />
World-of-Islam/144710522241165; http://www.geisteswissenschaften.fu-berlin.<strong>de</strong>/en/izma/forschung/<br />
34 35
logical rationalism in the medieval world of Islam between the 10th and<br />
the 13th centuries beyond and across <strong>de</strong>nominational bor<strong>de</strong>rs. Within this<br />
field, all major <strong>de</strong>si<strong>de</strong>rata have been i<strong>de</strong>ntified and are addressed in a<br />
number of primary and secondary sub-projects, many of which have already<br />
been completed and are published. So far, two international conferences<br />
have been held in 2009 and 2010, again with participants from the<br />
West and the Islamic World, and numerous critical editions and studies<br />
have been published in English, French, German, Arabic and Persian. Another<br />
international conference, Takfir: A diachronic perspective, was held<br />
in October 2011 in Madrid, in collaboration with the ERC Project KOHE-<br />
POCU. A further conference is planned for spring 2013 that will focus on<br />
“Jewish and Christian reception(s) of Muslim theology”.<br />
The purpose of the Research Project “Contacts and Controversies between<br />
Muslims, Jews and Christians”, which was fun<strong>de</strong>d by the Gerda<br />
Henkel Foundation (2005–07), was to bring into focus new textual materials<br />
that shed fresh light on the intellectual and social exchanges between<br />
Muslims and non-Muslims both in the Ottoman lands and in pre-mo<strong>de</strong>rn<br />
Iran and to foster intensified cooperation between scholars from a variety<br />
of disciplines. An international exploratory workshop on the topic, “The<br />
Position of Religious Minorities in the Ottoman Empire and Early Mo<strong>de</strong>rn<br />
Iran, as Reflected in Muslim Polemical and Apologetical Literature”, was<br />
fun<strong>de</strong>d by the European Science Foundation (ESF) (2007). The results of<br />
this project were published in a collective volume and several articles in<br />
peer-reviewed journals.<br />
The Research Project “Bible in Arabic” evolved in close cooperation with<br />
Meira Polliack and Camilla Adang (Tel Aviv University). Apart from numerous<br />
studies tracing the reception of the various Christian translation<br />
traditions among Muslim scholars during the first centuries of Islam that<br />
have already been published (Sabine Schmidtke), the collaborators will<br />
convene an international workshop on “The Bible in Arabic among<br />
Jews, Christians and Muslims” in May <strong>2012</strong>. Moreover, the first issue of<br />
the recently established journal Intellectual History of the Islamicate World<br />
(editor-in-chief: S. Schmidtke), to be published in summer 2013, will be<br />
<strong>de</strong>voted exclusively to this topic.<br />
A = Article; B = Blog; C = Conference paper / invited lecture; CE = Critical<br />
Edition; CV = Collective volume; E = Encyclopaedia entry; F = Facsimile;<br />
M = Monograph; R = Review article<br />
DOCUMENTA ARABICA<br />
A series of important works concerning Arabian history and culture<br />
Edited by Günter Meyer, Rudolf Sellheim<br />
Sponsored by H. H. Sheikh Dr. Sultan Bin Muhammed Al-Qasimi<br />
Johann Ludwig Burckhart · Julius Euting<br />
· Heinrich Freiherr von Maltzan ·<br />
Enno Littmann · Max Freiherr von Oppenheim<br />
· William Gifford Palgrave ·<br />
Ulrich Jasper Seetzen, u.a.<br />
To the people of the past the Arabian<br />
peninsula was the distant, impenetrable<br />
land of incense and gold. Even<br />
though the philologists, historians,<br />
geographers and travellers of the Islamic<br />
high middle ages recor<strong>de</strong>d many<br />
things of interest about their land and<br />
people, these <strong>de</strong>scriptions in Arabic remained<br />
inaccessible and alien to westerners.<br />
It was only in Enlightenment Europe<br />
that the conditions were first created<br />
whereby, with steely <strong>de</strong>termination<br />
and admirable commitment, brave<br />
men, and even some women, were able<br />
to bring back to Europe systematic and<br />
reliable information about the mysterious<br />
land of Arabia.<br />
These rich sources are indispensable<br />
for the researchers of today, not only<br />
for orientalists, but also for ethnologists<br />
and geographers, botanists, zoologists,<br />
geologists and any interested<br />
rea<strong>de</strong>r.<br />
Please ask for special prospectus!<br />
SULTAN BIN MUHAMMAD<br />
AL-QASIMI<br />
Meine frühen Lebensjahre<br />
Aus <strong>de</strong>m Englischen von Claudia Riefert.<br />
2011. 320 S. mit 24 Abb. Leinen mit<br />
Schutzumschlag.<br />
ISBN 978-3-487-14666-9 € 29,80<br />
The first part of the autobiography of<br />
Dr Sultan bin Muhammad Al-Qasimi<br />
spans the years until his appointment<br />
as Ruler of Sharjah as a young man of<br />
thirty-three. It shows the emergence of<br />
the man and the state, documenting the<br />
dramatic palace coups in his own emirate<br />
and the neighbouring emirate of Ras<br />
al-Khaimah and the struggles for power<br />
during the formation of the United Arab<br />
Emirates.<br />
“My Early Life”<br />
is an insi<strong>de</strong>r’s<br />
account and a<br />
wa r m-hea r te d<br />
memoir of personal<br />
and political<br />
<strong>de</strong>velopment<br />
that provi<strong>de</strong>s a<br />
unique insight<br />
into the formation<br />
of a wi<strong>de</strong>ly<br />
respected statesman.<br />
Georg Olms Verlag · Hagentorwall 7 · 31134 Hil<strong>de</strong>sheim · GERMANY<br />
Fon: +49 (0)5121/15010 · Fax: +49 (0)5121/150150 · E-Mail: info@olms.<strong>de</strong> · www.olms.<strong>de</strong> / www.olms.com<br />
2003<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “II Firk. Arab. 111 – A copy of al-Sharīf al-Murtaḍā’s<br />
Kitāb al-Dhakhira completed in 472/1079–80 in the Firkovitch-Collection,<br />
St. Petersburg,” [Persian] Maʿārif 20 ii (1382/2003), pp. 68–84.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “The ijāza from ʿAbd Allāh b. Ṣāliḥ al-Samāhījī to Nāṣir<br />
al-Jārūdī al-Qaṭīfī: A Source for the Twelver Shiʿi Scholarly Tradition of<br />
Baḥrayn,” Culture and Memory in Medieval Islam. Essays in Honour of Wilferd<br />
Ma<strong>de</strong>lung, eds. Farhad Daftary & Josef W. Meri, London: I.B. Tauris in<br />
laufend/theological_rationalism/in<strong>de</strong>x.html.<br />
36<br />
Diese Publikation wur<strong>de</strong> unterstützt durch<br />
This publication has been supported by<br />
Alumni Association of Freie Universität Berlin<br />
www.fu-berlin.<strong>de</strong>/erg
association with The Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2003, pp. 64–85.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Recent Studies on the Philosophy of Illumination and<br />
Perspectives for Further Research,” Dāneshnāmah. The Bilingual Quarterly<br />
of the Shahīd Beheshtī University 1 ii (Spring/Summer 2003), pp. 101–19<br />
(English section), p. 69 (Persian Section).<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Studies on Saʿd b. Manṣūr Ibn Kammūna (d. 683/1284):<br />
Beginnings, Achievements, and Perspectives,” Persica. Annual of the<br />
Dutch-Iranian Society 29 (2003), pp. 105–21.<br />
2004<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Re-Edition of al-Minhāj fī uṣūl al-dīn by Jār Allāh al-<br />
Zamakhsharī,” [Persian] Maʿārif 20 iii (1382/2004), pp. 107–48.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “A Bibliography of Ibn Abī Jumhūr al-Aḥsāʾī’s Works.<br />
Translated with additions and corrections by Ahmad Reza Ra-hi-mi<br />
Risseh,” [Persian] Nusḥeh Pazūḥī. A Collection of Essays and Articles on<br />
Manuscripts Studies and Related Subjects 1 (2004), pp. 291–309.<br />
[A] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, “Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī’s (d. 710/1311)<br />
Durrat al-Tāj and Its Sources. (Studies on Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī I),” Journal<br />
Asiatique 292 i-ii (2004), pp. 309–28.<br />
[CE] Abu l-Qasim al-Busti, Kitāb al-Bahth ʿan adillat al-takfīr wa l-tafsīq<br />
(Investigation of the evi<strong>de</strong>nce for charging with kufr and fisq). Edited with<br />
an Introduction by W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung & S. Schmidtke, Tehran: Iran University<br />
Press, 1382/2004.<br />
2006<br />
[A] B. Chiesa & S. Schmidtke, “The Jewish Reception of Samawʾal al-<br />
Maghribī’s (d. 570/1175) Ifḥām al-yahūd. Some Evi<strong>de</strong>nce from the Abraham<br />
Firkovitch Collection I,” Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam 31<br />
(2006), pp. 327–49.<br />
[A] W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung, “Abu l-Husayn al-Basri’s proof of the existence of God,”<br />
Arabic Theology, Arabic Philosophy, from the Many to the One. Essays in<br />
Celebration of Richard M. Frank, ed. J. Montgomery. Leuven 2006, pp. 273–<br />
80.<br />
[A] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, “Muslim Polemics against Judaism<br />
and Christianity in 18th Century Iran. The Literary Sources of Āqā<br />
Muḥammad ʿAlī Bihbahānī’s (1144/1732–1216/1801) Rādd-i shubahāt alkuffār,”<br />
Studia Iranica 35 (2006), pp. 69–94 [Abbreviated Persian translation<br />
by Muḥammad Kāẓim Raḥmatī: http://www.rahmati.kateban.com].<br />
[A] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, “Some notes on a new edition of a medieval<br />
philosophical text in Turkey: Shams al-Dīn al-Shah-ra-zūrī’s Rasāʾil<br />
al-Shajara al-ilāhiyya,” Die Welt <strong>de</strong>s Islams 46 i (2006), pp. 76–85.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, `‘The Karaites’ Encounter with the Thought of Abū<br />
l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī (d. 436/1044). A Survey of the Relevant Materials in<br />
the Firkovitch-Collection, St. Petersburg,`` Arabica 53 (2006), pp. 108–42.<br />
[Persian translation by Muḥammad Kāẓim Raḥmatī: http://www.religions.ir/mag/mag.php?magid=11117§ion=7].<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Ibn Abī Jumhūr al-Aḥsāʾī und sein Spätwerk Sharḥ al-<br />
Bāb al-ḥādī ʿashar,” Reflections on Reflections. Near Eastern writers reading<br />
literature. Dedicated to Renate Jacobi, eds. A. Neuwirth & A. C. Islebe,<br />
Wiesba<strong>de</strong>n: Reichert, 2006, pp. 119–45.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Forms and Functions of ‚Licences To Transmit’ (Ijāzas)<br />
in 18th-Century-Iran. ʿAbd Allāh al-Mūsawī al-Jazāʾirī al-Tustarī’s (1112–<br />
73/1701–59) Ijāza kabīra,” Speaking for Islam. Religious Authorities in Muslim<br />
Societies, eds. Gudrun Krämer & Sabine Schmidtke, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2006,<br />
pp. 95–127.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Un projet international: le manuel <strong>de</strong>s œuvres et manuscrits<br />
muʿtazilites,” Chronique du manuscrit au Yémen 2 (Juni 2006) [French<br />
version: http://cy.revues.org/document198.html; Arabic version: http://<br />
www.cefas.com.ye/spip.php?article158].<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Sahl b. al-Faḍl al-Tustarī’s K. al-Īmā,” Ginzei Qe<strong>de</strong>m:<br />
Shenaton le-ḥeḳer ha-genizah 2 (2006), pp. 61*–105*.<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Arabic Translations of Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s’ Mishneh Torah<br />
and the Commentary of ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn al-Muwaqqit on Sefer ha-Maddaʿ,<br />
Hilkhot Yeso<strong>de</strong>i ha-Torah I–IV”, (International Conference “Bridging the<br />
Worlds of Judaism and Islam”, Bar-Ilan University, 3–4 January 2006).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Sahl b. al-Faḍl al-Tustarī’s K. al-Īmāʾ” (Jerusalem, Institute<br />
for Advanced Studies, 14 February 2006).<br />
[CE] Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī, Taṣaffuḥ al-adilla. The extant parts introduced<br />
and edited by W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung & S. Schmidtke. Wiesba<strong>de</strong>n: Harrassowitz,<br />
2006.<br />
[CE] Samawʾal al-Maghribī’s (d. 570/1175) Ifḥām al-yahūd. The Early Recension,<br />
eds. I. Marazka, R. Pourjavady, S. Schmidtke, Wiesba<strong>de</strong>n: Harrassowitz,<br />
2006 (Abhandlungen für die Kun<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>s Morgenlan<strong>de</strong>s; 57, 2).<br />
[CE] Khulāṣat al-naẓar. An Anonymous Imami-Muʿtazilī Treatise (late<br />
6th/12th or early 7th/13th century). Edited with an Introduction by S.<br />
Schmidtke & H. Ansari, Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy & Institute<br />
of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, 2006. (Series on Islamic<br />
Philosophy and Theology. Texts and Studies; 2).<br />
[F] An Anonymous Commentary on Kitāb al-Tadhkira by Ibn Mattawayh.<br />
Facsimile Edition of Mahdavi Co<strong>de</strong>x 514 (6th/12th Century). Introduction<br />
and Indices by S. Schmidtke, Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy & Institute<br />
of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, 2006. (Series on Islamic<br />
Philosophy and Theology. Texts and Studies; 1).<br />
[M] W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung & S. Schmidtke, Rational Theology in Interfaith Communication.<br />
Abū l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī’s Muʿtazilī Theology among the Karaites<br />
in the Fatimid Age. Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2006.<br />
[M] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, A Jewish Philosopher of Baghdad. ʿIzz<br />
al-Dawla Ibn Kammūna (d. 683/1284) and His Writings, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2006.<br />
38 39
2007<br />
[A] C. Adang & S. Schmidtke, “Islamic Rational Theology in the Collections<br />
of Lei<strong>de</strong>n University Library. The ‘Supplements’ of the Zaydī Imām<br />
al-Nāṭiq bi-l-ḥaqq (d. 1033) to the theological Summa of Abū ʿAlī Ibn<br />
Khallād (fl. second half of the 10th century),” Omslag. Bulletin van <strong>de</strong> Universiteitsbibliotheek<br />
Lei<strong>de</strong>n en het Scaliger Instituut 3–2007, pp. 6–7.<br />
[A] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, “The Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī (d. 710/1311)<br />
Co<strong>de</strong>x (Ms. Marʿashī 12868) (Studies on Quṭb al-Dīn al-Shīrāzī II),” Studia<br />
Iranica 36 (2007), pp. 279–301.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Étu<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> la littérature polémique contre le Judaisme,”<br />
Annuaire 114. Résumé <strong>de</strong>s conférences et travaux 2005–2006. Ecole Pratique<br />
<strong>de</strong>s Hautes Etu<strong>de</strong>s. Section <strong>de</strong>s Sciences Religieuses. Paris 2007, pp. 183–86.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Capturing the meanings of God’s speech: the relevance<br />
of uṣūl al-fiqh to an un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of uṣūl al-tafsīr in Jewish and Muslim<br />
kalām,” A Word Fitly Spoken: Studies in Mediaeval Exegesis of the Hebrew<br />
Bible and the Qurʾān presented to Haggai Ben-Shammai, eds. Meir Bar-Asher,<br />
Sarah Stroumsa, Bruno Chiesa, Simon Hopkins, Jerusalem: The Ben<br />
Zvi Institute and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 2007, pp. *111-*156.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Uṣūl al-fiqh im jüdischen Kalām <strong>de</strong>s 10. und 11. Jahrhun<strong>de</strong>rts:<br />
Ein Überblick,” Orient als Grenzbereich? Rabbinisches und ausserrabbinisches<br />
Ju<strong>de</strong>ntum, ed. A. Kuyt and G. Necker, Wiesba<strong>de</strong>n 2007, pp.<br />
77–104.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Die Rezeption Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s’ in <strong>de</strong>r christlich-arabischen<br />
Literatur,” JUDAICA: Beiträge zum Verstehen <strong>de</strong>s Ju<strong>de</strong>ntums 63 (2007), pp.<br />
1–45.<br />
[C] R. Pourjavady, “ʿAlī Qulī Jadīd al-Islām and his Hidāyat al-ḍāllīn” (ESF<br />
Exploratory Workshop: “The Position of Religious Minorities in the Ottoman<br />
Empire and Early Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Iran, as Reflected in Muslim Polemical<br />
and Apologetical Literature”. Istanbul 14–16 June 2007).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Baḥr al-ʿUlūm’s disputation with the Jews. A Survey<br />
of the Transmission of the <strong>de</strong>bate” (ESF Exploratory Workshop: “The Position<br />
of Religious Minorities in the Ottoman Empire and Early Mo<strong>de</strong>rn<br />
Iran, as Reflected in Muslim Polemical and Apologetical Literature”. Istanbul<br />
14–16 June 2007).<br />
[CE] Rukn al-Dīn Ibn al-Malāḥimī al-Khwārazmī, Kitāb al-Fāʾiq fī uṣūl aldīn.<br />
Edited with an Introduction by W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung & M. McDermott, Tehran:<br />
Iranian Institute of Philosophy & Institute of Islamic Studies, Freie<br />
Universität Berlin, 1386/2007. (Series on Islamic Philosophy and Theology.<br />
Texts and Studies; 3).<br />
[CE] Jār Allāh al-Zamakhsharī, Kitāb al-Minhāj fī uṣūl al-dīn. Introduced<br />
and edited by S. Schmidtke, Beirut: Arab Scientific Publishers, 1428/2007.<br />
[CE] Critical Remarks by Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī on the Kitāb al-Maʿālim<br />
by Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, together with the Commentaries by ʿIzz al-Dawla<br />
Ibn Kammūna. Edited with an Introduction by S. Schmidtke & R. Pourjavady,<br />
Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy & Institute of Islamic Studies,<br />
Freie Universität Berlin, 1386/2007 (Series on Islamic Philosophy and<br />
Theology. Texts and Studies; 6).<br />
[CV] A Common Rationality. Muʿtazilism in Islam and Judaism, eds. C. Adang,<br />
S. Schmidtke & D. Sklare, Würzburg: Ergon, 2007 (Istanbuler Texte<br />
und Studien; 15).<br />
[F] Maḥmūd b. ʿAlī b. Maḥmūd al-Ḥimmaṣī al-Rāzī: Kashf al-maʿāqid fī<br />
sharḥ Qawāʿid al-ʿaqāʾid. Facsimile Edition of MS Berlin, Wetzstein 1527.<br />
Introduction and Indices by S. Schmidtke, Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy<br />
& Institute of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, 1386/2007<br />
(Series on Islamic Philosophy and Theology. Texts and Studies; 4).<br />
2008<br />
[A] C. Adang & S. Schmidtke, “Aḥmad b. Muṣṭafā Ṭāshkubrīzā<strong>de</strong>’s<br />
(d. 968/1561) polemical tract against Judaism,” Al-Qanṭara. Revista <strong>de</strong> Estudios<br />
Arabes 29 i (2008), pp. 79–113, 537–38.<br />
[A] ʿA. al-Sālimī, “al-Mutashābih li-l-Qurʾān li-l-Turaythīthī. Dirāsa lil-kitāb<br />
wa-nusakhihi al-khaṭṭiyya,” Majallat maʿhad al-makhṭūṭāt al-<br />
ʿarabiyya 52 (2008), pp. 7–43.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “The doctrinal views of the Banu l-ʿAwd (early 8th/14th<br />
century): an analysis of ms Arab. f. 64 (Bodleian Library, Oxford),” Le<br />
shiʿisme imamite quarante ans après. Hommage à Etan Kohlberg. Eds. M.<br />
A. Amir-Moezzi, M. Bar-Asher, S. Hopkins. Turnhout: Brepols, 2009, pp.<br />
357–82. [Partial Persian translation by Sayyid Muḥsin Mūsawī: http://tazkereh.kateban.com/entry1547.html].<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Theological Rationalism in the Medieval World of Islam,”<br />
al-ʿUsur al-wusta: The Bulletin of Middle East Medievalists 20 i (April,<br />
2008), pp. 17–29.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Abū al-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī on the Torah and its Abrogation,”<br />
Mélanges <strong>de</strong> l’Université Saint Joseph 61 (2008), pp. 559–80.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Rationale Theologie in <strong>de</strong>r islamischen Welt <strong>de</strong>s Mittelalters,”<br />
Verkündigung und Forschung 53 ii (2008), pp. 57–72.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “MS Mahdawi 514. An Anonymous Commentary on Ibn<br />
Mattawayh’s Kitāb al-Tadhkira,” Islamic Thought in the Middle Ages. Studies<br />
in Text, Transmission and Translation in Honour of Hans Daiber, eds. A.<br />
Akasoy & W. Raven. Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2008, pp. 139–62.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Ibn Kammūna, fīlusūf-i taʾthīr gudhar,” Kitāb-i māh-i<br />
falsafa 2 xiv (Ābān 1387/December 2008) [Special issue <strong>de</strong>voted to Ibn<br />
Kammūna], pp. 133–35.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Découverte d’un nouveau fragment du Kitāb al-mughnī<br />
fī abwāb al-tawḥīd wa-l-ʿadl du Qāḍī ʿAbd al-Jabbār al-Ha-ma-dā-nī dans<br />
une collection karaïte <strong>de</strong> la British Library,” Mélanges <strong>de</strong> l’Institut d’Etu<strong>de</strong>s<br />
Orientales 27 (2008), pp. 119–29.<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Ibn Ḥazm on Ashʿarism and Muʿtazilism” (Workshop<br />
“The Life and Work of Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba”. Istanbul 26–28 August 2008).<br />
[CE] O. Hamdan & S. Schmidtke, “Qadi ʿAbd al-Jabbār al-Hamadhānī<br />
(d. 415/1025) on the Promise and Threat. An Edition of a Fragment of<br />
his Kitāb al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawḥīd wa l-ʿadl preserved in the Firkovitch-Collection,<br />
St. Petersburg (II Firk. Arab. 105, ff. 14–92),” Mélanges <strong>de</strong><br />
l’Institut dominicain d’Etu<strong>de</strong>s orientales 27 (2008), pp. 37–117.<br />
[CE] Rukn al-Dīn Ibn al-Malāḥimī al-Khwārazmī, Tuḥfat al-mutakallimīn<br />
40 41
fī l-radd ʿalā l-falāsifa. Edited with an Introduction by W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung &<br />
H. Ansari, Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy & Institute of Islamic<br />
Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, 1387/2008. (Series on Islamic Philosophy<br />
and Theology. Texts and Studies; 7).<br />
[E] S. Schmidtke, “Jobbāʾī,” Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. 14 (New York, 2008),<br />
pp. 666–72.<br />
[E] S. Schmidtke, “Ḥāl,” Dānishnāma-yi jahān-i Islam, vol. 12 (Tehran,<br />
1387/2008), pp. 437–40.<br />
[F] Muḥammad b. ʿAlī b. Abī Jumhūr al-Aḥsāʾī (d. after 906/1501), Mujlī<br />
mirʾāt al-munjī fī l-kalām wa-l-ḥikmatayn wa-l-taṣawwuf. Lithograph edition<br />
by Aḥmad al-Shīrāzī (Tehran 1329/1911). Reprinted with an Introduction,<br />
Table of Contents, and Indices by S. Schmidtke, Tehran: Iranian Institute<br />
of Philosophy & Institute of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität Berlin,<br />
2008 (Series on Islamic Philosophy and Theology. Texts and Studies; 10).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Biblical predictions of the Prophet Muḥammad from<br />
the 9th century.” (Department of Religious Studies, University of North<br />
Carolina at Chapel Hill, April 2009).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Biblical materials in Zaydī sources.” (Reunion Conference,<br />
Muʿtazilism in Islam and Judaism, The Institute for Advanced Studies,<br />
The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, July 2009).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “K. Mabādiʾ al-adilla fī uṣūl al-dīn by the Zaydī Imām<br />
al-Nāṭiq bi-l-ḥaqq Abū Ṭālib Yaḥyā b. al-Ḥusayn al-Buṭḥānī (d. 424/1033):<br />
Who needs revelation?” (Reunion Conference, Muʿtazilism in Islam and<br />
Judaism, The Institute for Advanced Studies, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem,<br />
July 2009).<br />
[C] J. Thiele, “Zaydī Adoptions of Bahshamī Thought: The Theology of al-<br />
Ḥasan al-Raṣṣāṣ (d. 584/1188)” (Reunion Conference, Muʿtazilism in Islam<br />
and Judaism, The Institute for Advanced Studies, The Hebrew University,<br />
Jerusalem, July 2009).<br />
2009<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “ʿIlm al-kalām fī l-Islām. Al-Khiṭāb wa-l-tārīkh,” Al-Masār 10<br />
iii (Fall 2009), pp. 63–120.<br />
[A] H. Ansari & M.A. Amir-Moezzi, “Muḥammad b. Yaʿqūb al-Kulaynī (m.<br />
328 ou 329/939-40 ou 940-41) et son Kitʿb al-Kāfī: une introduction,” Studia<br />
Iranica 38 ii (2009), pp. 191-247.<br />
[A] M.A. Amir-Moezzi & S. Schmidtke, “Rationalisme et théologie dans<br />
le mon<strong>de</strong> musulman médiéval. Bref état <strong>de</strong>s lieux,” Revue <strong>de</strong> l’histoire <strong>de</strong>s<br />
religions 226 iv (2009), pp. 613–38.<br />
[A] L. Muehlethaler, “Ibn Kammūna on the argument of the Flying Man in<br />
Avicenna’s Išārāt and al-Suhrawardī’s Talwīḥāt,” Avicenna and his Legacy:<br />
A Gol<strong>de</strong>n Age of Science and Philosophy, ed. Y. T. Langermann, Turnhout:<br />
Brepols, 2009, pp. 179–203.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Abū al-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī and his transmission of biblical<br />
materials from Kitāb al-dīn wa-al-dawla by Ibn Rabban al-Ṭabarī: The evi<strong>de</strong>nce<br />
from Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Mafātīḥ al-ghayb,” Islam and Christian-<br />
Muslim Relations 20 ii (2009), pp. 105–18.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “New sources for the life and work of Ibn Abī Jumhūr<br />
al-Aḥsāʾī,” Studia Iranica 38 (2009), pp. 49–68. [Persian translation by<br />
Muḥammad Kāẓim Raḥmatī: “Manābiʿ-i tāzeh-yi yāb barāyi taḥqīq dar<br />
zandagī u āthār-i Ibn Abi Jumhūr Ahsāʾī,” Nusḥeh Pazūḥī. A Collection<br />
of Essays and Articles on Manuscripts Studies and Related Subjects 4 (in<br />
press)].<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “MS Berlin, Wetzstein II 1527. A unique manuscript<br />
of Maḥmūd b. ʿAlī b. Maḥmūd al-Ḥimmaṣī al-Rāzī’s Kashf al-maʿāqid fī<br />
sharḥ Qawāʿid al-ʿaqāʾid,” Tribute to Michael. Studies in Jewish and Muslim<br />
Thought Presented to Professor Michael Schwartz, eds. S. Klein-Braslavy,<br />
B. Abrahamov, J. Sadan, Tel Aviv: The Laster and Sally Entin Faculty of<br />
Humanities, The Chaim Ro-senberg School of Jewish Studies, pp. 67*–78*.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “The Rightly Guiding Epistle (al-Risāla al-Hādiya) by<br />
ʿAbd al-Salām al-Muhtadī al-Muḥammadī. A Critical Edition,” Jerusalem<br />
Studies in Arabic and Islam 36 (2009), pp. 439–70.<br />
2010<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “Maḥmūd al-Malāḥimī al-Muʿtazilī fī l-Yaman,” al-Masār 11<br />
ii (1431/2010), pp. 48–58.<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “Al-Imām al-Muʾayyad bi-llah al-Hārūnī: fatāwā wa-ajwibat<br />
al-masāʾil wa istiftāʾāt wujjihat ilayhī fī l-radd ʿalā al-bāṭiniyya wa<br />
ġayrihā min al-masāʾil,” al-Masar 33, pp. 57-72.<br />
[A] H. Ansari & S. Schmidtke, “The Zaydī reception of Ibn Khallād’s Kitāb<br />
al-Uṣūl: The taʿlīq of Abū Ṭāhir b. ʿAlī al-Ṣaffār,” Journal asiatique 298<br />
(2010), pp. 275–302.<br />
[A] H. Ansari & S. Schmidtke, “Muʿtazilism after ʿAbd al-Jabbār: Abū<br />
Rashīd al-Nīsābūrī’s Kitāb Masāʾil al-khilāf fī l-uṣūl (Studies on the transmission<br />
of knowledge from Iran to Yemen in the 6th/12th and 7th/13th c. I),”<br />
Studia Iranica 39 (2010), pp. 227–78.<br />
[A] D. Halft, “Schiitische Polemik gegen das Christentum im safawidischen<br />
Iran <strong>de</strong>s 11./17. Jahrhun<strong>de</strong>rts. Sayyid Aḥmad ʿAlawīs La-wā-miʿ-i<br />
rabbānī dar radd-i šubha-yi naṣrānī.” Contacts and Controversies between<br />
Muslims, Jews and Christians in the Ottoman Empire and Pre-Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Iran.<br />
Eds. Camilla Adang & Sabine Schmidtke, Würzburg 2010, pp. 273–334.<br />
[A] J. Thiele, “Propagating Muʿtazilism in the VIth/XIIth century Zaydiyya:<br />
The role of al-Ḥasan al-Raṣṣāṣ,” Arabica 57 v-vi (2010), pp. 536–58;<br />
58 i (2011), p. 165.<br />
[C] H. Ansari, “Un membre <strong>de</strong> l’école <strong>de</strong> Rayy, Abû l-Fadl al-ʿAbbâs b.<br />
Sharvîn et son œuvre théologique” (Séminaire du Centre d’His-toire <strong>de</strong>s<br />
Sciences et <strong>de</strong>s Philosophies Arabes et Médiévales (UMR 7219 - CNRS/<br />
Université Paris–7 Denis Di<strong>de</strong>rot/ EPHE/ Université Paris I) Sciences et<br />
philosophie, <strong>de</strong> l’Antiquité à l’Äge classique Séance du samedi 30 janvier<br />
2010, 10h–14h: Le Kalam (Théologie musulmane): état actuel <strong>de</strong> la recherche).<br />
[C] H. Ansari, “L’école <strong>de</strong>s théologiens muʿtazilites <strong>de</strong> Rayy: la famille<br />
Farrazādhī” (Theological Rationalism in Medieval Islam: New Sources<br />
and Perspectives. The Second International Conference of the European<br />
42 43
Research Council’s FP 7 Project “Theological Rationalism in the Medieval<br />
World of Islam”, 4–6 June 2010 in Istanbul, Turkey).<br />
[C] H. Ansari, “Al-Shalmaghānī et al-Hidāyat al-kubrā: une <strong>de</strong>s sources<br />
d’al-Khaṣībī dans la formation <strong>de</strong> la doctrine Nuṣayrī,” Messianism and<br />
Normativity in the Late Medieval and Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Persianate World: Themes<br />
and Sources, dirigé par Orkhan Mir-Kasimov, Freie Universität Berlin,<br />
September 2010.<br />
[C] H. Ansari, “La littérature du Hadith chez les zaydite en Iran et au Yémen,”<br />
Journée d’étu<strong>de</strong>s dans le cadre du projet transversal, “Controverses<br />
sur les écritures canoniques en Islam,” dirigé par Daniel De Smet (CNRS/<br />
LEM), November 2010.<br />
[C] H. Ansari, “Les réfutations <strong>de</strong>s zaydites contre les philosophes au VIe<br />
et VIIe siècles,” ‘Science and Philosophy in Classical Islamic Civilization’;<br />
8th International Conference of SIHSPAI (International Society for the<br />
History of Arabic and Islamic Science and Philosophy), London, The Institute<br />
of Ismaili Studies, December 2010.<br />
[C] D. Halft, “Christian-Muslim Controversies in 17th Century Safavid Isfahan.<br />
Missionaries in Conversation with Shīʿī Scholars” (31. Deutscher<br />
Orientalistentag, Marburg, 21 September 2010, Section Iranian Studies).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “The Reception of Abū al-Barakāt’s Philosophical<br />
Work: A Re-appraisal” (EAJS Conference Judaism in the Mediterranean<br />
Context, 25–29 July 2010 in Ravenna, Italy).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “Ibn Kammūna on the Pre-Eternity of the Human<br />
Soul” (SOAS Conference The Ontology of the Soul in Medieval Arabic<br />
Thought, 19 September 2010 in London).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “What is the question? The conception of philosophical<br />
problems in Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s commentaries on the works of Avicenna”<br />
(Deutscher Orientalistentag, 21–24 September in Marburg).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “ʿUmar ibn Sahlān al-Sāwī’s Nahj al-taqdīs and the<br />
early reception of Abū al-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s philosophical work” (SI-<br />
HSPAI Conference Philosophy and Science in Classical Islamic Civilisation,<br />
3–5 December 2010 in London).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī’s Kitāb al-Muʿtabar and<br />
the Avicennan Tradition” (AJS 42nd Annual Conference, 19–21 December<br />
2010 in Boston).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “On the Position of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Nihāyat<br />
al-ʿuqūl among his earlier works” (Theological Rationalism in Medieval Islam:<br />
New Sources and Perspectives. The Second International Conference<br />
of the European Research Council’s FP 7 Project ``Theological Rationalism<br />
in the Medieval World of Islam, 4–6 June 2010 in Istanbul, Turkey).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “Syllogistics and the Soul: From the toolbox of a 13thcentury<br />
philosopher in Baghdad” (Philosophy Department, John Hopkins<br />
University, Baltimore, 17 December 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Biblical testimonies to the Prophethood of Muḥammad<br />
in Zaydi sources” (The Departments of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations,<br />
Religious Studies and the Middle East Center at the University<br />
of Pennsylvania, PA, 6 December 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Breaking the wall of religious public opinion: How<br />
the study of interfaith crosspollination in the Islamicate World can uncover<br />
common ground” (Falling Walls: Berlin Conference on Future Breakthroughs<br />
in Science and Society, 7–8 November 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Ḥusām al-Dīn ʿAbd Allāh b. Zayd al-ʿAnsī (d. 667/1268)<br />
and his Kitāb al-Maḥajja al-bayḍā” (Religious movements and transformations<br />
in Judaism, Christianity and Islam. Israel Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences,<br />
January 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Jewish (and Christian) Converts in the Medieval World<br />
of Islam: Some Methodological Questions” (Herbert D. Katz Center for<br />
Advanced Judaic Studies, Phila<strong>de</strong>lphia, PA, 13 October 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “Jewish Contributions to Islamic Learning in the Medieval<br />
and Late Medieval Muslim World” (Van<strong>de</strong>rbilt University, Department<br />
of Jewish Studies, Nashville, TN, 18 November 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “The Islamic rational heritage - Muʿtazilism and<br />
Ashʿarism to be rediscovered” (Shaykh Ibrahim Center, Manama, Bahrain,<br />
February 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “The Muʿtazilite Manuscripts Project: The example of<br />
Abu l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī (d. 436/1045)” (al-Bīrūnī Institute of Oriental Studies,<br />
Aca<strong>de</strong>my of Sciences, Tashkent, Uzbekistan, 30 June 2010)<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “The Muʿtazilite Manuscripts Project” (Deutsches<br />
Archäologisches Institut, Sanaa, Yemen, 25 April 2010).<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “The reception of Abu l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī and Ibn al-<br />
Malāḥimī among the Zaydīs. The case of ʿAbd Allāh b. Zayd al-ʿAnsī”<br />
(The Institute of Ismaili Studies, Shi’i Studies Lecture Series, London, 27<br />
May 2010)<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “The Reception of Ibn Khallād’s Kitāb al-Uṣūl” (Theological<br />
Rationalism in Medieval Islam: New Sources and Perspectives. The<br />
Second International Conference of the European Research Council’s FP<br />
7 Project “Theological Rationalism in the Medieval World of Islam”, 4-6<br />
June 2010 in Istanbul, Turkey)<br />
[C] S. Schmidtke, “The Zaydi reception of Abu l-Husayn al-Basrî and Ibn<br />
al-Malâhimî” (Séminaire du Centre d’Histoire <strong>de</strong>s Sciences et <strong>de</strong>s Philosophies<br />
Arabes et Médiévales (UMR 7219 - CNRS/ Université Paris–7 Denis<br />
Di<strong>de</strong>rot/ EPHE/ Université Paris I) Sciences et philosophie, <strong>de</strong> l’Antiquité<br />
à l’Äge classique Séance du samedi 30 janvier 2010, 10h–14h: Le Kalam<br />
(Théologie musulmane): état actuel <strong>de</strong> la recherche).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Muʿtazilī-Zaydī uṣūl al-fiqh: A Longue Durée Perspective”<br />
(Theological Rationalism in Medieval Islam: New Sources and Perspectives.<br />
The Second International Conference of the European Research<br />
Council’s FP 7 Project “Theological Rationalism in the Medieval World of<br />
Islam”, 4–6 June 2010 in Istanbul, Turkey).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Jewish Muʿtazilite approaches to Hebrew semantics”<br />
(Memorial Conference for Dr. Friedrich Niessen: The Semitic languages of<br />
Jewish intellectual production. Madrid, CSIC, 11–12th March 2010).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “A Maimoni<strong>de</strong>an Trinitarianism: The Christology of Al-<br />
Rashīd Abū l-Khayr Ibn al-Tayyib (d. after 1270)” (Third International<br />
Congress of Eastern Christianity. Knowledge Transfer in the Mediterranean<br />
World, University of Córdoba, 2–4 December 2010).<br />
[C] J. Thiele, “Nūr al-Dīn Sulaymān b. ʿAbdallāh al-Khurāshī (d. 7th/13th<br />
c.) and his K. al-Tafṣīl li-jumal al-Taḥṣīl” (Deutsches Archäologisches Insti-<br />
44 45
ملزمة عن تاريخ اليمن الجزء ٥<br />
حفاظا على تراث اليمن الثقافي<br />
مشروع رقمنة اطوطات اليمنية<br />
زابينه اشميتكه ويان تيله<br />
tut, Sanaa, Yemen, 25 April 2010).<br />
[C] J. Thiele, “The Commentary Literature on al-Ḥasan al-Raṣṣāṣ’ K. al-<br />
Taḥṣīl” (Theological Rationalism in Medieval Islam: New Sources and Perspectives.<br />
The Second International Conference of the European Research<br />
Council’s FP 7 Project “Theological Rationalism in the Medieval World of<br />
Islam”, 4–6 June 2010 in Istanbul, Turkey).<br />
[C] E.-M. Zeis, “Proofs of Prophecy and Their Political-Theological Context:<br />
The Kitāb Ithbāt nubuwwat al-nabī of the Zaydī mutakallim Imām<br />
al-Muʾayyad bi-llāh al-Hārūnī (333–411)” (Theological Rationalism in<br />
Medieval Islam: New Sources and Perspectives. The Second International<br />
Conference of the European Research Council’s FP 7 Project “Theological<br />
Rationalism in the Medieval World of Islam”, 4–6 June 2010 in Istanbul,<br />
Turkey).<br />
[C] S. Vasalou,<br />
Preserving<br />
“An<br />
Yemen’s<br />
innate<br />
Cultural<br />
moral<br />
Heritage<br />
knowledge? In quest of Ibn Taymiyya’s<br />
moral epistemology” The Yemen Manuscript Digitization (Deutscher Project Orientalistentag, 21–24 September in<br />
Marburg).<br />
by Sabine Schmidtke and Jan Thiele<br />
[C] S. Vasalou, “Ibn Taymiyya’s ethics between Ashʿarite voluntarism and<br />
Muʿtazilite rationalism: a middle road?” (Theological Rationalism in Medieval<br />
Islam: New Sources and Perspectives. The Second International<br />
Conference of the European Research Council’s FP 7 Project “Theological<br />
Rationalism in the Medieval World of Islam”, 4–6 June 2010 in Istanbul,<br />
Turkey).<br />
[CV] Contacts and Controversies between Muslims, Jews and Christians in<br />
the Ottoman Empire and Pre-Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Iran, eds. C. Adang & S. Schmidtke,<br />
Würzburg: Ergon, 2010 (Istanbuler Texte und Studien; 21).<br />
[E] C. Adang & S. Schmidtke, “Polemics (Muslim-Jewish),” Encyclopaedia<br />
of the Jews in the Islamic World, ed. Norman A. Stillman, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2010,<br />
vol. 4, pp. 82–90.<br />
[E] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, “ʿAlī Qulī Jadīd al-Islām,” The Encyclopaedia<br />
of Islam. Three. Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2010.<br />
[E] S. Schmidtke, “Ibn Kammūna,” Encyclopaedia of the Jews in the Islamic<br />
World, ed. Norman A. Stillman, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2010.<br />
[E] S. Schmidtke, “Samawʾal al-Maghribī,” Encyclopaedia of the Jews in the<br />
Islamic World, ed. Norman A. Stillman, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2010.<br />
[E] G. Schwarb, “Kalām”, Encyclopedia of the Jews in the Islamic World, ed.<br />
Norman A. Stillman, Lei<strong>de</strong>n Brill, 2010, vol. III, pp. 91–98.<br />
[E] G. Schwarb, “Yūsuf al-Baṣīr”, Encyclopedia of the Jews in the Islamic<br />
World, ed. Norman A. Stillman, Lei<strong>de</strong>n Brill, 2010, vol. IV, pp. 651–655.<br />
Preserving Yemen’s Cultural Heritage<br />
Hefte zur Kulturgeschichte <strong>de</strong>s Jemen Band 5<br />
2011<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “L’héritage ésotérique du chiisme: un livre sur l’exégèse <strong>de</strong><br />
la sourate 97,” Arabica 58 i-ii (2011), pp. 7-18.<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “Risāla fī dhanb al-ghība lil- Qāḍī ʿAbd al-Ğabbār al-<br />
Hamaḏānī al-Muʿtazilī,” al-Masar 12 ii (2011), pp. 105-110.<br />
[A] H. Ansari & S. Schmidtke, “Iranian Zaydism during the 7th/13th century:<br />
Abū l-Faḍl b. Shahrdawīr al-Daylamī al-Jīlānī and his commentary<br />
on the Qurʾān,” Journal Asiatique 299 (2011), pp. 205-11.<br />
[A] H. Ansari & S. Schmidtke, “The literary-religious tradition among<br />
7th/13th century Yemenī Zaydīs: The formation of the Imām al-Mahdī li-<br />
Dīn Allāh Aḥmad b. al-Ḥusayn b. al-Qāsim (d. 656/1258),” Journal of Islamic<br />
Manuscripts 2 i (2011), pp. 165-222.<br />
[A] H. Ansari & S. Schmidtke, “Abū Saʿd al-Ḫargūšī and his Kitāb al-<br />
Lawāmiʿ: A Ṣūfī Gui<strong>de</strong> Book for Preachers from 4th/10th century Nīshāpūr,”<br />
Arabica 58 (2011), pp. 503-18 (with Hassan Ansari).<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “The Muslim Reception of Biblical Materials: Ibn Qutayba<br />
and his Aʿlām al-nubuwwa,” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 22 iii<br />
(2011), pp. 249-74.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Jemenitische Handschriften in <strong>de</strong>r Staatsbibliothek zu<br />
Berlin,” Für Forschung und Kultur. Son<strong>de</strong>rausgabe <strong>de</strong>r Zeitschrift „BibliotheksMagazin“<br />
anlässlich <strong>de</strong>s 350. Geburtstags <strong>de</strong>r Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin<br />
- Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Berlin 2011, pp. 52-57.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Quei muri abbattuti dall’Islam medieval [Those Walls<br />
Knocked down by Medieval Islam / Ces murs abattus par l’Islam medieval],”<br />
Oasis: Cristiani e Musulmani nell’era <strong>de</strong>l meticciato di civilità 13<br />
(2011) [http://www.oasiscenter.eu/no<strong>de</strong>/7199].<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke & J. Thiele, “Preserving Yemen’s Cultural Heritage: The<br />
Yemen Manuscript Digitization Project,” Fair Observer 27 July 2011 (http://<br />
www.fairobserver.com/article/preserving-yemens-cultural-heritage-yemen-manuscript-digitization-project?page=3).<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Muʿtazilism in the Age of Averroes,” In the Age of Averroes:<br />
Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth/Twelfth Century, ed. P. Adamson, London:<br />
Warburg Institute, 2011, pp. 251–82.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Manuskripte im Portrait: Eine Sprache, viele Schriften,”<br />
Newsletter of the Research Unit Intellectual History of the Islamicate World<br />
2 (2011), p. 4.<br />
[B] S. Schmidtke, “Muslimische I<strong>de</strong>engeschichte jenseits <strong>de</strong>r Religionsgrenzen:<br />
Chancen und Perspektiven” (http://fu-berlin.aca<strong>de</strong>mia.edu/<br />
SabineSchmidtke/Blog/51642/Muslimische-I<strong>de</strong>engeschichte-jenseits-<strong>de</strong>r-<br />
Religionsgrenzen-Chancen-und-Perspektiven).<br />
[C] H. Ansari, “Un bref historique <strong>de</strong>s commentaires coraniques chez les<br />
théologiens muʻtazilites, zaydites et imâmites jusqu'à la fin du septième<br />
siècle,” “L’exégèse philosophique du Coran”, dirigé par Meryem Sebti<br />
(CNRS), April 2011.<br />
[C] H. Ansari & Sabine Schmidtke, “Le traitement <strong>de</strong>s Muṭarrifites comme<br />
<strong>de</strong>s kuffâr,” International Conference: “Takfīr: A Diachronic Perspective,”<br />
Madrid, CSIC, October 2011.<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “On the conception of philosophical problems in<br />
Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Mafātīḥ al-ġayb and his philosophical commentaries”<br />
(Séminaire sur l’Exégèse philosophique du Coran, CNRS, Villejuif,<br />
April 12, 2011).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “Critical Avicennism of the 6th/12th century” (Workshop<br />
“Arabische Wissenschaft,” Max-Planck-Institute Berlin, June 24,<br />
2011).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “Konzepte <strong>de</strong>r Selbstwahrnehmung in <strong>de</strong>r arabisch-<br />
46 47
en Philosophie,” (Abschied vom Seelischen? Erkundungen zum menschlichen<br />
Selbstverständnis (Interdisziplinäre Veranstaltungsreihe, Universität<br />
Zürich, October 10, 2011).<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “The correspon<strong>de</strong>nce between Naǧm al-Dīn al-Kātibī<br />
al-Qazwīnī and Naṣīr al-Dīn al-Ṭūsī on proofs for the existence of the necessary<br />
of existence” (Rationalist Sciences I: Logic, Physics, Metaphysics,<br />
and Theology in the Post-Classical Period, Washington University in St.<br />
Louis. December 3–5, 2011).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Theological and Philosophical Fragments in the British<br />
Library Genizah Collection”, London: The British Library, Genizah Workshop,<br />
2 June 2011, 4pm - 5pm.<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “The Samaritan Abū l-Ḥasan al-Ṣūrī and the Qaraites:<br />
Qaraite-Samaritan Relations in the 5th/11th century Bilād al-Shām: Encounters,<br />
Polemics, and Intertextualities” (15th Congress of the Society for<br />
Judaeo-Arabic Studies, Cambridge 15-18 August 2011).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Parallel Text Processing and the critical edition of Judaeo-Arabic<br />
Texts” (15th Congress of the Society for Judaeo-Arabic Studies,<br />
Cambridge 15-18 August 2011).<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Muʿtazilism in a 20th Century Zaydi Qurʾān Commentary”,<br />
London: School of Oriental and African Studies, Centre of Islamic<br />
Studies, The Qurʾān: Text, Society and Culture, 11th November 2011, 3pm<br />
- 4pm. (http://www.soas.ac.uk/islamicstudies/conferences/quran2011/<br />
file72296.pdf), http://www.soas.ac.uk/islamicstudies/conferences/<br />
quran2011/file72262.pdf<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Non-Polemical Intellectual Encounters Between Muslims<br />
and Jews,” Cambridge: The Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Centre of Islamic<br />
Studies, University of Cambridge; The Centre for the Study of Muslim-<br />
Jewish Relations, Woolf Institute; Intertwined Worlds: The Judaeo-Islamic<br />
Tradition, 12th September 2011, 9am - 10am [To be published in the conference<br />
proceedings, within the Studies on the Children of Abraham series<br />
(http://www.brill.nl/publications/studies-children-abraham)]<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Qaraite-Samaritan Relations in 5th/11th Century Bilād<br />
al-Shām: Encounters, Polemics, and Intertextualities,” Cambridge: Cambridge<br />
University Library, Taylor-Schechter Genizah Research Unit, Society<br />
for Judaeo-Arabic Studies, Judaeo-Arabic Culture and the Arabic Speaking<br />
World: Linguistic, Textual and Social Crosspollinations, 16th August<br />
2011, 5pm - 6pm<br />
[C] G. Schwarb, “Abū al-Ḥasan al-Ṣūrī and the Qaraites: Qaraite-Samaritan<br />
Relations in 5th/11th Century Bilād al-Shām”, Oxford: Oxford Centre<br />
for Hebrew and Jewish Studies, British Association for Jewish Studies,<br />
Annual Conference 2011, ‘Jewish Languages’, 19th July 2011, 6pm - 7pm.<br />
[CE] C. Adang, W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung, S. Schmidtke, Baṣran Muʿtazilite Theology:<br />
Abū ʿAlī Muḥammad b. Khallād’s Kitāb al-uṣūl and its reception. A Critical<br />
Edition of the Ziyādāt Sharḥ al-uṣūl by the Zaydī Imām al-Nāṭiq bi-l-ḥaqq<br />
Abū Ṭālib Yaḥyā b. al-Ḥusayn b. Hārūn al-Buṭḥānī (d. 424/1033), Lei<strong>de</strong>n:<br />
Brill, 2011 (Islamic History and Civilization).<br />
[CE] Early Ibāḍī Literature: Abu l-Mundhir Bashīr b. Muḥammad b. Maḥbūb,<br />
Kitāb al-Raṣf fi l-Tawḥīd, Kitāb al-Muḥāraba and Sīra. Introduced and<br />
edited by Abdulrahman al-Salimi and Wilferd Ma<strong>de</strong>lung. Wiesba<strong>de</strong>n:<br />
Harrassowitz, 2011 (Abhandlungen für die Kun<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong>s Morgenlan<strong>de</strong>s).<br />
[F] Sulaymān b. ʿAbd Allāh al-Khurāshī, Kitāb al-Tafṣīl li-jumal al-Taḥṣīl.<br />
Facsimile Edition of Ms Berlin, Glaser 51. With Introductions and Indices<br />
by H. Ansari and J. Thiele, Tehran: Iranian Institute of Philosophy & Institute<br />
of Islamic Studies, Freie Universität Berlin, 2011 (Series of Islamic<br />
Philosophy Theology and Mysticism. Facsimiles and Editions).<br />
[M] S. Schmidtke and J. Thiele, Preserving Yemen’s Cultural Heritage: The<br />
Yemen Manuscript Digitization Project, Ṣanʿāʾ: Deutsches Archäologisches<br />
Institut, 2011 (Hefte zur Kulturgeschichte <strong>de</strong>s Jemen; 5).<br />
[M] J. Thiele, Kausalität in <strong>de</strong>r muʿtazilitischen Kosmologie. Das Kitāb al-<br />
Muʾattirāt wa-miftāḥ al-muškilāt <strong>de</strong>s Zayditen al-Ḥasan al-Raṣṣāṣ (st.<br />
584/1188), Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2011 (Islamic Philosophy, Theology, and Science.<br />
Texts and Studies; 84).<br />
<strong>2012</strong><br />
[A] H. Ansari, “Pišgoftār: al-Malāḥimī u kitāb al-Muʿtamad-e u,” Rukn al-<br />
Dīn Ibn al-Malāḥimī al-Khwārazmī, al-Muʿtamad fī uṣūl al-dīn, edited and<br />
introduced by Wilferd Ma<strong>de</strong>lung, Tehran: Mīrāth-e maktūb (Classical<br />
Muslim Heritage Series).<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Semantics of Hebrew in Medieval Theological and Philosophical<br />
Thought”, Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, ed.<br />
G. Khan, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Capturing the Meanings of God’s Speech: The Relevance<br />
of uṣūl al-fiqh to an un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of uṣūl al-tafsīr in Jewish and Muslim<br />
kalām,” Tafsīr: Interpreting the Qurʾān (Critical Concepts in Islamic Studies),<br />
Volume II: Tafsir: Theory and Constructs, Part 3: Procedural and Conceptual<br />
Devices (article no. 18), ed. M. Shah, London & New York: Routledge<br />
<strong>2012</strong> [reprint].<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Theological Semantics in Yūsuf al-Baṣīr’s Risāla fī maʿnā<br />
ijāzat al-naskh”, The Semitic Languages of Jewish Intellectual Production.<br />
Memorial Volume for Dr. Friedrich Niessen, eds. María Angeles Gallego and<br />
Juan Pedro Monferrer-Sala, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
[C] D. Halft, “Quelque relation rabbinique secrete” (H. Corbin)? Some<br />
Notes on Sayyed Aḥmad ʿAlavī’s (d. between 1054/1644 and 1060/1650)<br />
Quotations from the Hebrew Bible in his Shiʿi Refutations of Christianity,<br />
International Workshop “The Bible in Arabic among Jews, Christians and<br />
Muslims”, Tel Aviv University, Israel, May 24, <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
[C] L. Muehlethaler, “Bare self-awareness as cognitive basis in the epistemology<br />
of Abū l-Barakāt al-Baghdādī,” Between Selfhood and Selfawareness:<br />
Varieties of Subjectivity in the Arabic and Latin Traditions The<br />
Finnish Institute in Berlin, April 12, <strong>2012</strong><br />
[CE] Rukn al-Dīn Ibn al-Malāḥimī al-Khwārazmī, al-Muʿtamad fī uṣūl aldīn.<br />
Revised and enlarged edition by Wilferd Ma<strong>de</strong>lung, Tehran: Mīrāth-e<br />
maktūb, <strong>2012</strong> (Classical Muslim Heritage Series; 1).<br />
[E] S. Schmidtke, “Ibn Mattawayh,“ The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Three<br />
(Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill).<br />
[F] Legal Methodology in 6th/12th century Khwārazm: The Kitāb al-Tajrīd<br />
fī uṣūl al-fiqh by Rukn al-Dīn Maḥmūd b. al-Malāḥimī al-Khwārazmī (d.<br />
536/1141). Facsimile edition of MS Arab e 103 (Bodleian Library, Oxford),<br />
with an introduction and indices by Hassan Ansari and Sabine Schmidtke,<br />
48 49
Tehran: Markaz-i Dāʾirat al-maʿārif-i buzurg-i islāmī, 1390/<strong>2012</strong>.<br />
[M] H. Ansari, Bar-rassī-hā-yī tārīkhī har ḥawza-yi islām wa tashayyuʿ:<br />
Majmūʿa-yi nawad maqāla wa-yaddāsht, Tehran: Kitābkhāna-yi mūze wa<br />
markaz-i asnād-i majlis-i shūrā-yi islāmī, 1390/<strong>2012</strong>.<br />
[M] J. Thiele, Die Theologie <strong>de</strong>s Zayditen al-Ḥasan ar-Raṣṣāṣ. Rezeption und<br />
Entwicklung bahšamitischer Lehren im Jemen <strong>de</strong>s 6./12. Jahrhun<strong>de</strong>rts, unpublished<br />
PhD thesis, Freie Universität <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
In press<br />
[A] C. Adang & S. Schmidtke, “Muʿtazilī Discussions of the Abrogation of<br />
the Torah. Ibn Khallād (4th/10th century) and His Commentators,” Reason<br />
and Faith in Medieval Judaism and Islam. Ed. M. Ángeles Gallego. Lei<strong>de</strong>n:<br />
Brill.<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “Un muḥaddith muʿtazilite zaydite: Abū Saʿd al-Sammān<br />
et ses Amālī,” The neglected Šīʿites: Studies in the legal and intellectual history<br />
of the Zaydīs = Arabica. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 59 iii-iv<br />
(<strong>2012</strong>), pp. 267-90.<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “Zamīne hāye tārīḫī ye taʾlīf e kitāb e Nihāyat ul-marām,”<br />
in Ḍiyāʾ al-Dīn al-Makkī’s Nihāyat ul-marām fī dirāyat ul-kalām, Facsimile<br />
Publication with Introduction and Indices by Ayman Shiha<strong>de</strong>h, Tehran:<br />
Mīrāth-e maktūb (Classical Muslim Heritage Series).<br />
[A] H. Ansari, “The Kitāb al-waṣiyya of ʿĪsā b. al-Mustafād: The history of<br />
a text,” Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought, eds. Michael Cook,<br />
Najam Hai<strong>de</strong>r, Intisar A. Rabb and Asma Sayeed, Palgrave Series in Islamic<br />
Theology, Law, and History, Palgrave Macmillan.<br />
[A] H. Ansari & S. Schmidtke, “Muʿtazilism in Rayy and Astarābād: Abu<br />
l-Faḍl al-ʿAbbās b. Sharwīn,” Studia Iranica 41 (<strong>2012</strong>).<br />
[A] D. Halft, “A Hitherto Unknown Persian Manuscript of Ḥosayn Vāʿeẓ<br />
Kāšefī’s (d. 910/1504-05) Treatise on Ethics Aḫlāq-e moḥsenī in the Dominican<br />
Priory in Vienna,” Journal of Islamic Manuscripts 3 (<strong>2012</strong>), pp. 1-13.<br />
[A] L. Muehlethaler, “Ibn Kammūna on the Pre-Eternity of the Human<br />
Soul,” Muslim World.<br />
[A] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, “La vie, l’œuvre et la pensée philosophique<br />
d’Ibn Kammūna,” Ibn Kammūna, Examen <strong>de</strong> la critique <strong>de</strong>s trois<br />
religions monothéistes, trad. Simon Bellahsen, Paris: Vrin.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “The History of Zaydī Studies: An Introduction,” The<br />
neglected Šīʿites: Studies in the legal and intellectual history of the Zaydīs =<br />
Arabica. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 59 iii-iv (<strong>2012</strong>), pp. 185-199.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Biblical predictions of the Prophet Muḥammad among<br />
the Zaydīs of Iran,” The neglected Šīʿites: Studies in the legal and intellectual<br />
history of the Zaydīs = Arabica. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 59 iiiiv<br />
(<strong>2012</strong>), pp. 218-266.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Two commentaries on Najm al-Dīn al-Kātibī’s al-<br />
Shamsiyya, copied in the hand of David b. Joshua Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s’ (fl. ca.<br />
1335-1410 CE),” Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought, eds. Michael<br />
Cook, Najam Hai<strong>de</strong>r, Intisar A. Rabb and Asma Sayeed, Palgrave<br />
Series in Islamic Theology, Law, and History, Palgrave Macmillan.<br />
[A] S. Schmidtke, “Early Ashʿarite Theology: Abū Bakr al-Bāqillānī (d.<br />
403/1013) and his Hidāyat al-mustarshidīn,” Bulletin d’Etu<strong>de</strong>s Orientales.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “The reception of Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s in Christian-Arabic literature”,<br />
Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the Society of Judaeo-Arabic<br />
Studies, ed. Y. Tobi, Haifa.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “A Maimoni<strong>de</strong>an Trinitarianism: The Christology of Al-<br />
Rashīd Abū l-Khayr Ibn al-Tayyib (d. after 1270),” Proceedings of the Third<br />
International Congress of Eastern Christianity: Knowledge Transfer in the<br />
Mediterranean World, ed. Juan Pedro Monferrer-Sala, Cordoba: Cordoba<br />
University Press.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Muʿtazilism in a 20th century Zaydī Qurʾān commentary,”<br />
The neglected Šīʿites: Studies in the legal and intellectual history of<br />
the Zaydīs = Arabica. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies 59 iii-iv (<strong>2012</strong>),<br />
pp. 371-402.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Zaydī-Muʿtazilī Traditions of uṣūl al-fiqh, 4th/10th–<br />
11th/17th centuries,” Theological Rationalism in Medieval Islam: New<br />
Sources and Perspectives, Leuven: Peeters, 2013.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Jewish Adaptations of Islamic Legal Hermeneutics (uṣūl<br />
al-fiqh),” Jewish—non-Jewish Relations – Between Exclusion and Embrace,<br />
ed. H. Holtschnei<strong>de</strong>r and M. Diemling (to be published online @ http://<br />
www.jnjr.div.ed.ac.uk/). (inclu<strong>de</strong>s a critical edition of a Jewish adaptation<br />
of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s K. al-Maʿālim fī uṣūl al-fiqh).<br />
[A] J. Thiele, “La causalité selon al-Ḥākim al-Ǧišumī,” The neglected Šīʿites:<br />
Studies in the legal and intellectual history of the Zaydīs = Arabica. Journal<br />
of Arabic and Islamic Studies 59 iii-iv (<strong>2012</strong>), pp. 291-318.<br />
[CE] Nukat al-Kitāb al-Mughnī. A Recension of ʿAbd al-Jabbār al-<br />
Hamadhānī’s (d. 415/1025) al-Mughnī fī abwāb al-tawḥīd wa-l-ʿadl. Al-<br />
Kalām fī l-tawlīd. Al-Kalām fī l-istiṭāʿa. Al-Kalām fī l-taklīf. Al-Kalām fī<br />
l-naẓar wa-l-maʿārif. The extant parts introduced and edited by O. Hamdan<br />
and S. Schmidtke. Beirut: Orient Institut (Bibliotheca Islamica).<br />
[CV] S. Schmidtke (ed.), The neglected Šīʿites: Studies in the legal and intellectual<br />
history of the Zaydīs = Arabica. Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies<br />
59 iii-iv (<strong>2012</strong>).<br />
[E] S. Schmidtke, “Ibn Mattawayh,” The Encyclopaedia of the World of Islam<br />
(Tehran).<br />
[E] G. Schwarb, “Amr”, The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Three (Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill).<br />
[E] G. Schwarb, “al-Aṣamm”, The Encyclopaedia of Islam. Three (Lei<strong>de</strong>n:<br />
Brill).<br />
[E] G. Schwarb, “Abū ʿAbdallāh al-Baṣrī”, The Encyclopaedia of Islam.<br />
Three (Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill).<br />
[F] Twelver Shīʿite Theology in 6th/12th century Syria. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān b.<br />
ʿAlī b. Muḥammad al-Ḥusaynī and his Commentary on al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī’s<br />
Muqaddima. Facsimile Publication with Introduction and Indices by Hassan<br />
Ansari and Sabine Schmidtke. Tehran: Mīrāth-e maktūb, [in press]<br />
(Classical Muslim Heritage Series; 2).<br />
[R] G. Schwarb, Review of M. Goldstein, Karaite Exegesis in Medieval Jerusalem:<br />
The Ju<strong>de</strong>o-Arabic Pentateuch Commentary of Yūsuf ibn Nūḥ and Abū<br />
al-Faraj Hārūn (Texts and Studies in Medieval and Early Mo<strong>de</strong>rn Judaism,<br />
26), Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2011 [ISBN 978-3-16-150972-8], to be pub-<br />
50 51
lished in the Journal of Semitic Studies.<br />
[R] G. Schwarb, Review of C. Adang, W. Ma<strong>de</strong>lung and S. Schmidtke<br />
(eds.), Baṣran Muʿtazilite Theology: Abū ʿAlī Muḥammad b. Khallād’s Kitāb<br />
al-Uṣūl and its reception, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2011, to be published in BSOAS 75,2<br />
(June <strong>2012</strong>).<br />
[R] G. Schwarb, Review of J. Thiele, Kausalität in <strong>de</strong>r muʿtazilitischen<br />
Kosmologie: Das Kitāb al-Muʾaṯṯirāt wa-miftāḥ al-muškilāt <strong>de</strong>s Zayditen<br />
al-Ḥasan ar-Raṣṣāṣ (st. 584/1188), Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill, 2011, to be published in<br />
BSOAS 75,2 (June <strong>2012</strong>).<br />
[R] G. Schwarb, Review of S. Stroumsa, Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s in His World: Portrait<br />
of a Mediterranean Thinker, to be published in Speculum: A Journal of Medieval<br />
Studies 87,2 (<strong>2012</strong>).<br />
Forthcoming<br />
[A] H. Ansari & S. Schmidtke, “Al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī: His Writings on Theology<br />
and Their Reception,” The Study of Shīʿī Islam: The State of the Field,<br />
Issues of Methodology and Recent Developments, eds. Farhad Daftary and<br />
Gurdofarid Miskinzoda, London: I.B. Tauris.<br />
[A] H. Ansari, S. Schmidtke & J. Thiele, “Muʿtazilism among Yemeni<br />
Zaydīs,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Sabine Schmidtke,<br />
Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />
[A] L. Muehlethaler, “Konzepte <strong>de</strong>r Selbstwahrnehmung in <strong>de</strong>r arabischen<br />
Philosophie,” in H.-U. Rüegger, E. Dueck, S. Tietz (eds.) Abschied vom<br />
Seelischen? Erkundungen zum menschlichen Selbstverständnis, Vdf Hochschulverlag<br />
ETH Zuerich: Zürich, <strong>2012</strong>. ISBN 978-3-7281-3424-0.<br />
[A] L. Muehlethaler, “The philosophical theology of Ibn Sīnā and his<br />
school” Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Sabine Schmidtke, Oxford:<br />
Oxford University Press.<br />
[A] L. Muehlethaler, “Revising Avicenna’s ontology of the soul: Ibn<br />
Kammūna on the soul’s eternity a parte ante,” The Muslim World.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “ʿAlī b. Ṭaybughā’s (d. 793/1391) Commentary on Maimoni<strong>de</strong>s’<br />
Mishneh Torah, Sefer ha-Maddaʿ, Hilkhot Yeso<strong>de</strong>i ha-Torah I-IV:<br />
A Philosophical Encyclopaedia of the 14th Century”, in tbd.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Excursus II - The Jewish and Samaritan Reception of<br />
Muʿtazilism,” The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. S. Schmidtke,<br />
Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “Excursus III - The Coptic Reception of Ashʿarite Theology,”<br />
The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. S. Schmidtke, Oxford:<br />
Oxford University Press.<br />
[A] G. Schwarb, “The Scholastic phase of the Muʿtazila up to Abū ’l-Ḥusayn<br />
al-Baṣrī including his reception in Baghdad and Khwārazm,” The Oxford<br />
Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. S. Schmidtke, Oxford: Oxford University<br />
Press.<br />
[A] J. Thiele, “Theological Compendia in Late 6th/12th and Early<br />
7th/13th Century Zaydism: Al-Ḥasan al-Raṣṣāṣ’s K. al-Taḥṣīl and its commentaries,”<br />
Theological Rationalism in Medieval Islam: New Sources and<br />
Perspectives, eds. Lukas Mühlethaler & Gregor Schwarb, Leuven: Peeters.<br />
[A] J. Thiele, “Abū Hāshim al-Jubbāʾī’s (d. 321/933) theory of<br />
states (aḥwāl) and its adaption among Ashʿarite theologians,” The Oxford<br />
Handbook of Islamic Theology, ed. Sabine Schmidtke, Oxford: Oxford University<br />
Press.<br />
[CV] S. Schmidtke (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology, Oxford:<br />
Oxford University Press.<br />
[CV] R. Pourjavady & S. Schmidtke, The Philosophical Tradition in Iran<br />
during the Qajar Period (1794-1925).<br />
[CV] Kh. El-Rouayheb & S. Schmidtke (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Islamic<br />
Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br />
[CV] S. Schmidtke, C. Adang, M. Fierro (eds.), Ibn Ḥazm of Cordoba: Life<br />
and Works of a Controversial Thinker, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill (Handbuch <strong>de</strong>r Orientalistik).<br />
[CV] Theological Rationalism in Medieval Islam: New Sources and Perspectives,<br />
eds. Lukas Mühlethaler & Gregor Schwarb, Leuven: Peeters.<br />
[E] S. Schmidtke, “Abu l-Ḥusayn al-Baṣrī,” The Encyclopeadia of the World<br />
of Islam (Tehran)<br />
[M] H. Ansari, L’imamat et l’Occultation selon l’imamisme: Etu<strong>de</strong> bibliographique<br />
et histoire <strong>de</strong>s texts, Lei<strong>de</strong>n: Brill.<br />
[M] L. Muehlethaler & R. Pourjavady, Defending Avicennan Philosophy:<br />
ʿUmar b. Sahlān al-Sāwī in Response to the Criticisms of Abū l-Barakāt al-<br />
Baghdādī and Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Karīm al-Shahrastānī.<br />
52 53
Brill’s Online Resources<br />
in Middle East & Islamic Studies<br />
Over three centuries of scholarly publishing<br />
Over three centuries of scholarly publishing<br />
Over three centuries of scholarly publishing<br />
booksandjournals.brillonline.com<br />
BrillOnline<br />
Books and Journals<br />
referencework s .br i l lon l i ne.com<br />
BrillOnline<br />
Reference Works<br />
bibliog raphies.br illon line.com<br />
BrillOnline<br />
Bibliographies<br />
M I D D L E E A S T &<br />
I S L A M I C S T U D I E S<br />
E -B O O K S O N L I N E<br />
Brockelmann<br />
Online<br />
Encyclopaedia of<br />
theQurʾān<br />
Online<br />
Bibliography of<br />
Arabic Books<br />
Online<br />
Christian-Muslim<br />
Relations Online<br />
Encyclopedia of Arabic<br />
Language and Linguistics<br />
Online<br />
Encyclopedia<br />
of Jews in the Islamic World<br />
Online<br />
Encyclopaedia<br />
Islamica<br />
Online<br />
i n d e x<br />
islamicus<br />
o n l i n e<br />
First<br />
Encyclopaedia<br />
of Islam<br />
Online<br />
E ncyclopé di E<br />
dE l’isl a m<br />
E n lign E<br />
encyclopaedia<br />
of islam<br />
online<br />
encyclopaedia<br />
of islam<br />
Second edition<br />
online<br />
EncyclopEdia of<br />
WomEn<br />
& islamic<br />
culturEs<br />
onlinE<br />
S O<br />
P r i m ary S o u r c e c o l l e c t i o n<br />
S O<br />
P r i m ary S o u r c e c o l l e c t i o n<br />
S O<br />
P r i m ary S o u r c e c o l l e c t i o n<br />
S O<br />
P r i m ary S o u r c e c o l l e c t i o n<br />
S O<br />
P r i m ary S o u r c e c o l l e c t i o n<br />
- Encyclopaedia of Islam 1st edition, Online<br />
- Encyclopaedia of Islam 2nd edition, Online<br />
- Encyclopaedia of Islam THREE, Online<br />
- Encyclopédie <strong>de</strong> l’Islam en Ligne<br />
- Bibliography of the Arabic Book Online<br />
- Encyclopaedia of the Qur’an Online<br />
- Encyclopedia of Women & Islamic Cultures Online<br />
- Encyclopaedia Islamica Online<br />
- Brockelmann Online<br />
- Christian-Muslim Relations Online<br />
- Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics Online<br />
- Encyclopedia of Jews in the Islamic World Online<br />
- In<strong>de</strong>x Islamicus Online<br />
- Early Western Korans Online<br />
- Hebrew and Ju<strong>de</strong>o-Arabic Printing in Baghdad Online<br />
- Hebrew, Ju<strong>de</strong>o-Arabic,<br />
and Marathi Jewish Printing in India Online<br />
- Middle Eastern Manuscripts Online 1: Pioneer Orientalists<br />
- Muslims in Russia Online<br />
- Russian-Ottoman Relations Online<br />
- Shāhnāmah Editions Online<br />
- Western Travellers in the Islamic World Online<br />
For electronic books and journals, please also visit: booksandjournals.brillonline.com<br />
For online reference works, please also visit: referenceworks.brillonline.com<br />
For online bibliographies, please also visit: bibliographies.brillonline.com<br />
To request a free trial or for more information, contact our sales <strong>de</strong>partment: sales@brillonline.com
Version: 2.0 <strong>2012</strong>-05-15<br />
Layout and typography: Jonas Müller-Laackman<br />
Photographs title page, 4, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 23, 25, 27, 31, 34: Ernst Fesseler<br />
Manuscript images pp. 13, 21 @Russian National Library (with kind permission)<br />
Manuscript images pp. 17, 18, 21, 24, 35 @Süleimaniye Library (with kind permission)<br />
Research Unit Intellectual History of the Islamicate World<br />
Institute of Islamic Studies<br />
Freie Universität Berlin<br />
Altensteinstr. 40<br />
14195 Berlin, Germany<br />
Tel +49-30-83852487, Fax +49-30-83852830<br />
presse.ihiw@gmail.com<br />
http://www.ihiw.<strong>de</strong><br />
Copyright © <strong>2012</strong> by Sabine Schmidtke. All rights reserved.