Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
Winston Churchill
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ZtooKS, ARTS<br />
& CURIOSITIES<br />
Exploring the "<strong>Churchill</strong> Myth"<br />
Michael Richards<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> Proceedings<br />
1994-1995, edited by<br />
Richard M. Langworth.<br />
Published by The<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> Center,<br />
Washington, D.C. 144<br />
pages, softbound, illustrated,<br />
$10 postpaid<br />
from <strong>Churchill</strong> Stores,<br />
PO Box 96, Contoocook NH 03229 USA<br />
<strong>Winston</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong>, leading<br />
Time magazine's poll for "Person<br />
of the Century," is the<br />
most revised and reinterpreted figure in<br />
20th Century history. The "<strong>Churchill</strong><br />
myth"—which Sir <strong>Winston</strong> forthrightly<br />
promoted through his books and speeches<br />
as "my case"—has lately been broadly<br />
challenged, especially since the release of<br />
once-secret wartime documents in<br />
Britain, America, Russia and Germany.<br />
During 1994-95, <strong>Churchill</strong> was<br />
accused of wishing to sterilize mental incompetents,<br />
backing appeasement in the<br />
1930s, promoting the use of poison gas<br />
in World War II, destroying the Empire,<br />
engineering the Pearl Harbor attack and<br />
the 1929 Wall Street crash, spying on the<br />
Soviet Union, and harboring "a lifelong<br />
antipathy toward coloured people."<br />
As <strong>Churchill</strong> once said in another<br />
context, "there is surely some happy<br />
ground between these scarecrow extremes."<br />
And there is no need for irresponsible<br />
critics, when we have so many<br />
responsible ones—over thirty of whom<br />
contribute to <strong>Churchill</strong> Proceedings 1994-<br />
1995, published by The <strong>Churchill</strong> Center<br />
in Washington.<br />
The book comprises speeches or<br />
papers at 1994-95 <strong>Churchill</strong> Center<br />
events by speakers including William F.<br />
Buckley, Jr.; Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.;<br />
Special Relationship Plus<br />
Richard M. Langworth<br />
OVER<br />
HERE<br />
RAY M O N D<br />
S E I T Z<br />
Over Here, by<br />
Raymond Seitz.<br />
London: Weidenfeld<br />
& Nicolson,<br />
hardbound, 376<br />
pages, regular<br />
price £20/$35,<br />
CC/ICS member<br />
price $24. Also<br />
available in paperback<br />
William Manchester; William Rusher;<br />
Roy Jenkins; a dozen scholars; and college<br />
students who delivered papers at <strong>Churchill</strong><br />
Center conferences or seminars.<br />
A non-profit educational organization,<br />
The <strong>Churchill</strong> Center is not<br />
averse to negative viewpoints. "On balance,<br />
naturally, our view of <strong>Churchill</strong> is<br />
positive," says the editor, "but we try not<br />
to paper over <strong>Churchill</strong>'s faults. His best<br />
friend, Lord Birkenhead, once remarked,<br />
'When <strong>Winston</strong> is right he is superb.<br />
When he's wrong, well, oh my God...'"<br />
Among the debates in this volume<br />
is one between Larry Arnn of the<br />
Claremont Institute and Professor Warren<br />
Kimball of Rutgers. "<strong>Churchill</strong> was a<br />
British statesman whose goal was to advance<br />
the interests of Great Britain," says<br />
Kimball. "<strong>Churchill</strong> was a British statesman<br />
whose goal was to advance liberty,"<br />
replies Arnn, who goes on to contrast<br />
British "interests" with those of the Soviet<br />
Union. Similar diversity is offered (between<br />
Kimball and Buckley) over<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong>'s professed trust of Stalin, and<br />
(between Arnn and Lord Jellicoe) over the<br />
value of <strong>Churchill</strong>'s Arctic convoys to<br />
Russia. Lord Jenkins, a onetime Labour<br />
foe, says there is no need to whitewash<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong>'s record: let it stand.<br />
There are pieces here that reach<br />
back—David Stafford on <strong>Churchill</strong> and<br />
Secret Intelligence; Lord Jellicoe's marvelous<br />
retrospective on <strong>Churchill</strong> and Jellicoe's<br />
father, who commanded Britain's<br />
Grand Fleet in World War I and about<br />
whom <strong>Churchill</strong> said, "He was the only<br />
man who could lose the war in an afternoon."<br />
There are pieces that look forward—Arthur<br />
Schlesinger on how<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> will survive revisionist history;<br />
Coach Johnny Parker on how he uses<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> to inspire nothing less than the<br />
New England Patriots football team.<br />
There are intimate views of young <strong>Winston</strong>,<br />
by his granddaughter Celia Sandys;<br />
and the old, by his daughter Lady<br />
Soames. All in all, it's a fine mix. Sir <strong>Winston</strong>,<br />
who was always in the thick of debate,<br />
would be delighted with it.<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> was always<br />
careful never to criticize America<br />
publicly. When reporters w°Hnston<br />
asked if he had any complaints, he would<br />
often reply, "toilet paper too thin, newspapers<br />
too fat."<br />
Privately <strong>Churchill</strong> was less reticent,<br />
although he always maintained a decent<br />
respect for the two kindred countries<br />
which in the end both claimed him as a<br />
citizen. In 1945 he said he had heard a<br />
British peer state that Great Britain would<br />
have to become the forty-ninth State of<br />
the American Union, while an American<br />
congressman was saying that America<br />
should not be asked to reenter the British<br />
Empire. "It seems to me," he remarked,<br />
"that the path of wisdom lies somewhere<br />
between these two scarecrow extremes."<br />
<strong>Churchill</strong> went on to recite his<br />
familiar prescription of "a fraternal relationship<br />
between the two great Englishspeaking<br />
organizations." He worked hard<br />
to establish that relationship, succeeding<br />
only partially. But it is probably reasonable<br />
to conclude that <strong>Churchill</strong> was right<br />
when he said that if Britain and America<br />
are together, they are usually in the right,<br />
and if they are divided, one of them is almost<br />
always wrong! continued >»<br />
FINEST HOUR IOI/36