10.11.2014 Views

Winston Churchill

Winston Churchill

Winston Churchill

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ZtooKS, ARTS<br />

& CURIOSITIES<br />

Exploring the "<strong>Churchill</strong> Myth"<br />

Michael Richards<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong> Proceedings<br />

1994-1995, edited by<br />

Richard M. Langworth.<br />

Published by The<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong> Center,<br />

Washington, D.C. 144<br />

pages, softbound, illustrated,<br />

$10 postpaid<br />

from <strong>Churchill</strong> Stores,<br />

PO Box 96, Contoocook NH 03229 USA<br />

<strong>Winston</strong> <strong>Churchill</strong>, leading<br />

Time magazine's poll for "Person<br />

of the Century," is the<br />

most revised and reinterpreted figure in<br />

20th Century history. The "<strong>Churchill</strong><br />

myth"—which Sir <strong>Winston</strong> forthrightly<br />

promoted through his books and speeches<br />

as "my case"—has lately been broadly<br />

challenged, especially since the release of<br />

once-secret wartime documents in<br />

Britain, America, Russia and Germany.<br />

During 1994-95, <strong>Churchill</strong> was<br />

accused of wishing to sterilize mental incompetents,<br />

backing appeasement in the<br />

1930s, promoting the use of poison gas<br />

in World War II, destroying the Empire,<br />

engineering the Pearl Harbor attack and<br />

the 1929 Wall Street crash, spying on the<br />

Soviet Union, and harboring "a lifelong<br />

antipathy toward coloured people."<br />

As <strong>Churchill</strong> once said in another<br />

context, "there is surely some happy<br />

ground between these scarecrow extremes."<br />

And there is no need for irresponsible<br />

critics, when we have so many<br />

responsible ones—over thirty of whom<br />

contribute to <strong>Churchill</strong> Proceedings 1994-<br />

1995, published by The <strong>Churchill</strong> Center<br />

in Washington.<br />

The book comprises speeches or<br />

papers at 1994-95 <strong>Churchill</strong> Center<br />

events by speakers including William F.<br />

Buckley, Jr.; Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.;<br />

Special Relationship Plus<br />

Richard M. Langworth<br />

OVER<br />

HERE<br />

RAY M O N D<br />

S E I T Z<br />

Over Here, by<br />

Raymond Seitz.<br />

London: Weidenfeld<br />

& Nicolson,<br />

hardbound, 376<br />

pages, regular<br />

price £20/$35,<br />

CC/ICS member<br />

price $24. Also<br />

available in paperback<br />

William Manchester; William Rusher;<br />

Roy Jenkins; a dozen scholars; and college<br />

students who delivered papers at <strong>Churchill</strong><br />

Center conferences or seminars.<br />

A non-profit educational organization,<br />

The <strong>Churchill</strong> Center is not<br />

averse to negative viewpoints. "On balance,<br />

naturally, our view of <strong>Churchill</strong> is<br />

positive," says the editor, "but we try not<br />

to paper over <strong>Churchill</strong>'s faults. His best<br />

friend, Lord Birkenhead, once remarked,<br />

'When <strong>Winston</strong> is right he is superb.<br />

When he's wrong, well, oh my God...'"<br />

Among the debates in this volume<br />

is one between Larry Arnn of the<br />

Claremont Institute and Professor Warren<br />

Kimball of Rutgers. "<strong>Churchill</strong> was a<br />

British statesman whose goal was to advance<br />

the interests of Great Britain," says<br />

Kimball. "<strong>Churchill</strong> was a British statesman<br />

whose goal was to advance liberty,"<br />

replies Arnn, who goes on to contrast<br />

British "interests" with those of the Soviet<br />

Union. Similar diversity is offered (between<br />

Kimball and Buckley) over<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong>'s professed trust of Stalin, and<br />

(between Arnn and Lord Jellicoe) over the<br />

value of <strong>Churchill</strong>'s Arctic convoys to<br />

Russia. Lord Jenkins, a onetime Labour<br />

foe, says there is no need to whitewash<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong>'s record: let it stand.<br />

There are pieces here that reach<br />

back—David Stafford on <strong>Churchill</strong> and<br />

Secret Intelligence; Lord Jellicoe's marvelous<br />

retrospective on <strong>Churchill</strong> and Jellicoe's<br />

father, who commanded Britain's<br />

Grand Fleet in World War I and about<br />

whom <strong>Churchill</strong> said, "He was the only<br />

man who could lose the war in an afternoon."<br />

There are pieces that look forward—Arthur<br />

Schlesinger on how<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong> will survive revisionist history;<br />

Coach Johnny Parker on how he uses<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong> to inspire nothing less than the<br />

New England Patriots football team.<br />

There are intimate views of young <strong>Winston</strong>,<br />

by his granddaughter Celia Sandys;<br />

and the old, by his daughter Lady<br />

Soames. All in all, it's a fine mix. Sir <strong>Winston</strong>,<br />

who was always in the thick of debate,<br />

would be delighted with it.<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong> was always<br />

careful never to criticize America<br />

publicly. When reporters w°Hnston<br />

asked if he had any complaints, he would<br />

often reply, "toilet paper too thin, newspapers<br />

too fat."<br />

Privately <strong>Churchill</strong> was less reticent,<br />

although he always maintained a decent<br />

respect for the two kindred countries<br />

which in the end both claimed him as a<br />

citizen. In 1945 he said he had heard a<br />

British peer state that Great Britain would<br />

have to become the forty-ninth State of<br />

the American Union, while an American<br />

congressman was saying that America<br />

should not be asked to reenter the British<br />

Empire. "It seems to me," he remarked,<br />

"that the path of wisdom lies somewhere<br />

between these two scarecrow extremes."<br />

<strong>Churchill</strong> went on to recite his<br />

familiar prescription of "a fraternal relationship<br />

between the two great Englishspeaking<br />

organizations." He worked hard<br />

to establish that relationship, succeeding<br />

only partially. But it is probably reasonable<br />

to conclude that <strong>Churchill</strong> was right<br />

when he said that if Britain and America<br />

are together, they are usually in the right,<br />

and if they are divided, one of them is almost<br />

always wrong! continued >»<br />

FINEST HOUR IOI/36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!