FEATURES BREAKING THE BARRIERS Merle Hoffman Inter<strong>view</strong>s Kate Millet NO MANDATORY TESTING! A Fem<strong>in</strong>ist Prostitute Speaks Out BY CAROL LEIGH 10 THE TEEN WHO JUST SAID "NO!" How a 15-Year-Old Woman Turned A School System Upside Down INTERVIEW BY ROBERTA KALECHOFSKY DEPARTMENTS Editorial: Merle Hoffman ON THE ISSUES 15 1 • New York Pro-Choice Coalition demonstrator puts her politics on the front l<strong>in</strong>e at rally <strong>in</strong> front of St. Patrick's Cathedral dur<strong>in</strong>g "Operation Rescue"- Photo by Bettye Lane Cover Photography Bettye Lane HIV-POSITIVE WOMEN HAVE RIGHTS TOO— and <strong>The</strong>y're Often Denied BY BARBARA SANTEE, Ph.D. 11 We've Come A Long Way??? Feedback Choice Books 4 25 18
[ON THE | THE JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE FOR PROGRESSIVES I VOL. X, 1988 PUBLISHER/EDITOR IN CHIEF Merle Hoffman MANAGING EDITOR Beverly Lowy ASSISTANT EDITOR Karen Aisenberg CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Phyllis Chesler Irene Davall Roberta Kalechofsky Flo Kennedy Nancy Lloyd ART DIRECTORS Michael Dowdy Julia Gran ADVERTISING AND SALES DIRECTOR Carolyn Handel PUBLISHING CONSULTANT Andy Kowl ON THE ISSUES A fem<strong>in</strong>ist, humanist publication dedicated to promot<strong>in</strong>g political action through awareness and education; work<strong>in</strong>g toward a global political consciousness; foster<strong>in</strong>g a spirit of collective responsibility for positive social change; eradicat<strong>in</strong>g racism, sexism, speciesism; and support<strong>in</strong>g the struggle of historically disenfranchised groups powerless to protect and defend themselves. UNSOLICITED MANUSCRIPTS All unsolicited material will be read by the editors For return, enclose self-addressed, stamped envelope with proper postage. Articles should be not less than I0 and not more than 15 double-spaced, typewritten pages on women's health, social or political <strong>issue</strong>s by people with hands on experience <strong>in</strong> their fields. Professional papers are accepted. All edit<strong>in</strong>g decisions are at the discretion of the editors. Fem<strong>in</strong>ist cartoons are also acceptable under the same provisions. ON THE ISSUES does not accept fiction or poetry. Advertis<strong>in</strong>g is accepted at the discretion of the publisher. Acceptance does not necessarily imply endorsement. ON THE ISSUES Is published as an <strong>in</strong><strong>format</strong>ional and educational service of CHOICES Women's Medical Center, Inc. 97-77 Queens Boulevard Forest Hills, NY 11374-3317 ISSN 0895-6014 Publisher's Note <strong>The</strong> op<strong>in</strong>ions expressed by contributors to our publication and by those we <strong>in</strong>ter<strong>view</strong> are not necessarily those of the editors. ON THE ISSUES is traditionally a forum for ideas and concepts and a place where women may have their voices heard without fear of censure or censorship. O N T H E I S S U E S "Where are your troops, Hoffman?" <strong>The</strong> question came at me from left field. It was ra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, cold and very early <strong>in</strong> the morn<strong>in</strong>g. I was stand<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d a police barricade on East 85th Street <strong>in</strong> New York City with 50 other pro-choice activists. We were counter demonstrat<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st "Operation Rescue", the recent right-w<strong>in</strong>g evangelical <strong>in</strong>vasion of this country's abortion cl<strong>in</strong>ics when these words came <strong>in</strong>to my auditory field. I turned to face my questioner. Middle-aged, white male, polyester suit, fetal feet button—<strong>in</strong> all, a good soldier of the Lord. "Where are your troops?" I looked past him towards the small band of fem<strong>in</strong>ist activists, chant<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>tense; beyond the 500 or so kneel<strong>in</strong>g pray<strong>in</strong>g "rescuers"; past the police, the press, the passersby and thought about his question. Had he read my m<strong>in</strong>d? Where were my troops? Where were the troops? This was, after all, no armchair <strong>in</strong>tellectual dialogue, no ideological conference, no rout<strong>in</strong>e march and rally—this was an all out military maneuver—a direct confrontation and I and "my troops" appeared sadly outnumbered. Eighty-fifth Street was a moment frozen <strong>in</strong> time. <strong>The</strong> small two-story abortion cl<strong>in</strong>ic under attack was situated between 3rd and Lex<strong>in</strong>gton Avenues. As the drama unfolded, bus<strong>in</strong>ess as usual went on on the avenues. Dogs got walked, some people shopped, some stopped to chat, others rushed on to work. All go<strong>in</strong>g about their daily rout<strong>in</strong>es as if a war was not happen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> front of them. It made me th<strong>in</strong>k of those documentaries of the Second World War narrated by Sir Laurence Olivier— where two separate realities existed side by side <strong>in</strong> a surrealistic montage; mass executions <strong>in</strong> fields filled with gently sway<strong>in</strong>g yellow flowers. Some passersby did stop to offer support—an older woman and a few youths from a nearby private school; however, to most of them the <strong>in</strong>vasion was just another New York vignette, another "bread and circus", one more type of street enterta<strong>in</strong>ment for the masses. Be<strong>in</strong>g at the barricades dur<strong>in</strong>g "Operation Rescue" gave new mean<strong>in</strong>g to the words "front l<strong>in</strong>es". I certa<strong>in</strong>ly was no stranger to theoretical and political battles, but the press<strong>in</strong>g reality of hundreds of nightsticks, sawhorses be<strong>in</strong>g shoved <strong>in</strong>to my face, the mount<strong>in</strong>g tension of the crowds around me and the palpable smell of danger—was someth<strong>in</strong>g quite different from anyth<strong>in</strong>g I had ever experienced. "Where are your troops, Hoffman?" My questioner had verbalized one of my private <strong>in</strong>tellectual dialogues. But really not so private— after all, the question of just where the fem<strong>in</strong>ist movement is now, where the fem<strong>in</strong>ist movement is go<strong>in</strong>g and is the fem<strong>in</strong>ist movement alive or dead, ad <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>itum—has become the <strong>in</strong>tellectual staple, the core <strong>issue</strong> around which media, fem<strong>in</strong>ists, politicians and anyone who feels like it can <strong>in</strong>stantly pontificate. Of course my "rescuer" had a far more literal <strong>in</strong>terpretation of this question <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d. He was merely count<strong>in</strong>g heads. Very often the anti-choice movement is rightly criticized for be<strong>in</strong>g authoritarian, anti-egalitarian, regressive, repressive, religious, etc.—All <strong>in</strong> all, un-liberal, un<strong>in</strong>tellectual, and, <strong>in</strong>deed, their literature summon<strong>in</strong>g people to New York City stated that "Operation Rescue" could be the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of a righteous, peaceful upris<strong>in</strong>g of Godfear<strong>in</strong>g people across the country that will '<strong>in</strong>spire' politicians to correct man's law, and make 'child kill<strong>in</strong>g' illegal aga<strong>in</strong>. Stand<strong>in</strong>g for America's children means you are ultimately stand<strong>in</strong>g for your future, your freedom and the very survival of America." In New York, "Operation Rescue" chose as its battlefront small, unprotected doctors' offices rather than large well-known (and well-prepared) facilities. Unwill<strong>in</strong>g to face a strong opposition <strong>in</strong> terms of deal<strong>in</strong>g with the highly secure sites of the major cl<strong>in</strong>ics, rescuers belied their strong words with acts of cowardice and attempted to kill flies with cannons. Consider<strong>in</strong>g that every day <strong>in</strong> New York City alone there are thousands of women who term<strong>in</strong>ate their pregnancies at any one of at least 100 providers, "Operation Rescue's" claim that they "saved hundreds of babies from death" was more than slightly exaggerated. While the actions of "Operation Rescue" seemed to be geared more at gett<strong>in</strong>g favorable media attention (<strong>in</strong> which they succeeded) rather than wag<strong>in</strong>g a truly serious battle for a revolutionary upris<strong>in</strong>g of the righteous, the participants did, <strong>in</strong> fact, appear to share a transcendent unify<strong>in</strong>g purpose— that of express<strong>in</strong>g what they believe to be God's will on earth: fetal rights. For the fanatical antichoice activists, this <strong>in</strong>cluded illegally block<strong>in</strong>g entrances to abortion cl<strong>in</strong>ics so that women would be denied access to constitutionally guaranteed medical services and cont<strong>in</strong>ually harass<strong>in</strong>g patients by verbal attacks such as scream<strong>in</strong>g "Please don't kill your baby". Try<strong>in</strong>g to publicly project the image of a groundswell of pious people aga<strong>in</strong>st abortion through the media, "rescuers" stated they were follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the footsteps of Ghandi and Mart<strong>in</strong> Luther K<strong>in</strong>g Jr. <strong>The</strong> "rescuers'" attempt at compar<strong>in</strong>g the "rightto-life movement" (with their agenda of compulsory pregnancy and control over women's reproductive rights) to the great civil rights struggle seems to be an <strong>in</strong>tellectual anathema at best and an obscenity at worst. Indeed, these "Ghandi disciples" are the people who publicly brag that the 1