2011 Annual Report - Virginia Attorney General
2011 Annual Report - Virginia Attorney General
2011 Annual Report - Virginia Attorney General
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
xxii<br />
<strong>2011</strong> REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL<br />
assigned those personal care aides to care for Medicaid patients in their homes. As a<br />
result, from October 2007 through June 2010, HCVA billed and was paid Medicaid<br />
funds for non-certified, untrained personal care aides placed with Medicaid patients.<br />
HCVA was sentenced to three years probation, a fine of $10,000 and ordered to pay<br />
$323,420 in restitution. McElwain was sentenced to sixteen months in prison,<br />
followed by a three-year term of supervised release.<br />
In addition to obtaining significant criminal recoveries, MFCU also settled<br />
several noteworthy civil matters. One case was a settlement involving Forest<br />
Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (together, Forest) in which<br />
MFCU played a leading role in the investigation and negotiation of the settlement<br />
recovery on behalf of the states. The National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control<br />
Units (NAMFCU) appointed a global case team led by counsel from <strong>Virginia</strong>, AAG<br />
Lelia Winget-Hernandez, to negotiate a multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of the<br />
Medicaid participating states. The underlying investigation was based on several qui<br />
tam civil actions filed in federal district courts and state courts across the country.<br />
The state Medicaid settlement resolved civil liability against Forest for its efforts to<br />
illegally market the prescription drugs Celexa and Lexapro for off-label uses (both<br />
drugs are approved by the Food and Drug Administration as antidepressants), and<br />
illegal distribution of Levothroid based on the company's increased distribution of the<br />
drug after it was no longer classified as a covered outpatient drug within the meaning<br />
of 42 U.S.C. § 1396r-8(k)(2). The civil settlement released Forest from civil liability<br />
based on the company’s illegal marketing and kickback schemes to promote Celexa<br />
and Lexapro and the illegal distribution of Levathroid. The total civil settlement was<br />
$149.1 million, of which $131,140,212 was designated as the recovery to the<br />
Medicaid program, including federal and state shares. The total recovery to the state<br />
share of the Medicaid program was $60,324,497.48. The final settlement to the<br />
Commonwealth of <strong>Virginia</strong> was $1,003,703.90, including interest. In addition to a<br />
civil recovery, Forest pleaded guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505 in that the<br />
company corruptly endeavored to influence, obstruct, and impede an agency<br />
proceeding; violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a), 333(a)(1), 352(f)(1) for introducing an<br />
unapproved drug, Levothroid, into interstate commerce; and violations of 21 U.S.C.<br />
§§ 331(a), 333(a)(1), 352(f)(1) for introducing a misbranded drug, Celexa, into<br />
interstate commerce.<br />
MFCU also expects to participate in a settlement involving a $950 million<br />
recovery for the United States and the participating states based on an investigation<br />
involving Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Merck). The NAMFCU-appointed global<br />
case team worked with the Department of Justice and the states to negotiate a<br />
settlement with Merck on behalf of the state Medicaid programs. Once the agreement<br />
is finalized, the state Medicaid settlement will resolve civil liability against Merck for<br />
its practices to market Vioxx for unapproved uses resulting in payment of Medicaid<br />
reimbursements for the drug. Specifically, the civil Medicaid settlement will resolve<br />
civil liability against the company for improperly engaging in practices designed to<br />
market, advertise and promote Vioxx for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, a<br />
condition that Vioxx is not approved by the Food & Drug Administration to treat.<br />
Moreover, the settlement will resolve civil liability against the company for<br />
improperly promoting the cardiovascular safety of Vioxx based on improper<br />
statements and misleading promotional materials. Based on the state Medicaid