11.11.2014 Views

2011 Annual Report - Virginia Attorney General

2011 Annual Report - Virginia Attorney General

2011 Annual Report - Virginia Attorney General

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

xxii<br />

<strong>2011</strong> REPORT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL<br />

assigned those personal care aides to care for Medicaid patients in their homes. As a<br />

result, from October 2007 through June 2010, HCVA billed and was paid Medicaid<br />

funds for non-certified, untrained personal care aides placed with Medicaid patients.<br />

HCVA was sentenced to three years probation, a fine of $10,000 and ordered to pay<br />

$323,420 in restitution. McElwain was sentenced to sixteen months in prison,<br />

followed by a three-year term of supervised release.<br />

In addition to obtaining significant criminal recoveries, MFCU also settled<br />

several noteworthy civil matters. One case was a settlement involving Forest<br />

Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (together, Forest) in which<br />

MFCU played a leading role in the investigation and negotiation of the settlement<br />

recovery on behalf of the states. The National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control<br />

Units (NAMFCU) appointed a global case team led by counsel from <strong>Virginia</strong>, AAG<br />

Lelia Winget-Hernandez, to negotiate a multimillion dollar settlement on behalf of the<br />

Medicaid participating states. The underlying investigation was based on several qui<br />

tam civil actions filed in federal district courts and state courts across the country.<br />

The state Medicaid settlement resolved civil liability against Forest for its efforts to<br />

illegally market the prescription drugs Celexa and Lexapro for off-label uses (both<br />

drugs are approved by the Food and Drug Administration as antidepressants), and<br />

illegal distribution of Levothroid based on the company's increased distribution of the<br />

drug after it was no longer classified as a covered outpatient drug within the meaning<br />

of 42 U.S.C. § 1396r-8(k)(2). The civil settlement released Forest from civil liability<br />

based on the company’s illegal marketing and kickback schemes to promote Celexa<br />

and Lexapro and the illegal distribution of Levathroid. The total civil settlement was<br />

$149.1 million, of which $131,140,212 was designated as the recovery to the<br />

Medicaid program, including federal and state shares. The total recovery to the state<br />

share of the Medicaid program was $60,324,497.48. The final settlement to the<br />

Commonwealth of <strong>Virginia</strong> was $1,003,703.90, including interest. In addition to a<br />

civil recovery, Forest pleaded guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505 in that the<br />

company corruptly endeavored to influence, obstruct, and impede an agency<br />

proceeding; violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a), 333(a)(1), 352(f)(1) for introducing an<br />

unapproved drug, Levothroid, into interstate commerce; and violations of 21 U.S.C.<br />

§§ 331(a), 333(a)(1), 352(f)(1) for introducing a misbranded drug, Celexa, into<br />

interstate commerce.<br />

MFCU also expects to participate in a settlement involving a $950 million<br />

recovery for the United States and the participating states based on an investigation<br />

involving Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (Merck). The NAMFCU-appointed global<br />

case team worked with the Department of Justice and the states to negotiate a<br />

settlement with Merck on behalf of the state Medicaid programs. Once the agreement<br />

is finalized, the state Medicaid settlement will resolve civil liability against Merck for<br />

its practices to market Vioxx for unapproved uses resulting in payment of Medicaid<br />

reimbursements for the drug. Specifically, the civil Medicaid settlement will resolve<br />

civil liability against the company for improperly engaging in practices designed to<br />

market, advertise and promote Vioxx for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, a<br />

condition that Vioxx is not approved by the Food & Drug Administration to treat.<br />

Moreover, the settlement will resolve civil liability against the company for<br />

improperly promoting the cardiovascular safety of Vioxx based on improper<br />

statements and misleading promotional materials. Based on the state Medicaid

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!